CVE-2024-6299 (GCVE-0-2024-6299)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-06-25 13:02 – Updated: 2024-08-29 15:04
VLAI
Title
Use of a Key Past its Expiration Date in Conduit
Summary
Lack of consideration of key expiry when validating signatures in Conduit, allowing an attacker which has compromised an expired key to forge requests as the remote server, as well as PDUs with timestamps past the expiry date
Severity
4.8 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-324 - Use of a Key Past its Expiration Date
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Conduit Contributors | Conduit |
Affected:
0 , < 0.8.0
(semver)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-6299",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-07-03T13:58:35.120104Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-07-05T17:22:58.070Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T21:33:05.377Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://gitlab.com/famedly/conduit/-/releases/v0.8.0"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://conduit.rs/changelog/#v0-8-0-2024-06-12"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Conduit",
"vendor": "The Conduit Contributors",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.8.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Michael Maltsev for finding vulnerability, Matthias Ahouansou for fixing it"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Lack of consideration of key expiry when validating signatures in Conduit, allowing an attacker which has compromised an expired key to forge requests as the remote server, as well as PDUs with timestamps past the expiry date"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-324",
"description": "CWE-324: Use of a Key Past its Expiration Date",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-29T15:04:59.770Z",
"orgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
"shortName": "GitLab"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://gitlab.com/famedly/conduit/-/releases/v0.8.0"
},
{
"url": "https://conduit.rs/changelog/#v0-8-0-2024-06-12"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade to version 0.8.0"
}
],
"title": "Use of a Key Past its Expiration Date in Conduit"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
"assignerShortName": "GitLab",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-6299",
"datePublished": "2024-06-25T13:02:25.979Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-06-25T10:30:35.803Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-29T15:04:59.770Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2024-6299",
"date": "2026-05-25",
"epss": "0.00114",
"percentile": "0.29591"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-6299\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@gitlab.com\",\"published\":\"2024-06-25T13:15:50.587\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T09:49:23.313\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Lack of consideration of key expiry when validating signatures in Conduit, allowing an attacker which has compromised an expired key to forge requests as the remote server, as well as PDUs with timestamps past the expiry date\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Falta de consideraci\u00f3n de la caducidad de la clave al validar firmas en Conduit, lo que permite a un atacante que ha comprometido una clave caducada falsificar solicitudes como servidor remoto, as\u00ed como PDU con marcas de tiempo posteriores a la fecha de caducidad.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"cve@gitlab.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":2.5},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":3.7,\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":1.4}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"cve@gitlab.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-324\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:conduit:conduit:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"0.8.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"0A42037C-F568-4862-BEE1-FCE796E55CD1\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://conduit.rs/changelog/#v0-8-0-2024-06-12\",\"source\":\"cve@gitlab.com\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://gitlab.com/famedly/conduit/-/releases/v0.8.0\",\"source\":\"cve@gitlab.com\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://conduit.rs/changelog/#v0-8-0-2024-06-12\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://gitlab.com/famedly/conduit/-/releases/v0.8.0\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://gitlab.com/famedly/conduit/-/releases/v0.8.0\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://conduit.rs/changelog/#v0-8-0-2024-06-12\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-01T21:33:05.377Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-6299\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2024-07-03T13:58:35.120104Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-07-05T15:20:44.614Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Use of a Key Past its Expiration Date in Conduit\", \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Michael Maltsev for finding vulnerability, Matthias Ahouansou for fixing it\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 4.8, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"The Conduit Contributors\", \"product\": \"Conduit\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"0.8.0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"solutions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Upgrade to version 0.8.0\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://gitlab.com/famedly/conduit/-/releases/v0.8.0\"}, {\"url\": \"https://conduit.rs/changelog/#v0-8-0-2024-06-12\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Lack of consideration of key expiry when validating signatures in Conduit, allowing an attacker which has compromised an expired key to forge requests as the remote server, as well as PDUs with timestamps past the expiry date\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-324\", \"description\": \"CWE-324: Use of a Key Past its Expiration Date\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a\", \"shortName\": \"GitLab\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-29T15:04:59.770Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-6299\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-29T15:04:59.770Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-06-25T10:30:35.803Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a\", \"datePublished\": \"2024-06-25T13:02:25.979Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitLab\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…