CVE-2022-38693 (GCVE-0-2022-38693)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-09-01 07:28 – Updated: 2025-09-02 13:44
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
In FDL1, there is a possible missing payload size check. This could lead to memory buffer overflow without requiring additional execution privileges.
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-09-02 13:43 UTC
CWE
- CWE-119 - Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unisoc (Shanghai) Technologies Co., Ltd. | SC9863A//T310/T610/T618/T606/T612/T616/T760/T770/T820/S8000/T750/T765 |
Affected:
/
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-38693",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-02T13:43:56.661632Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-119",
"description": "CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-02T13:44:24.612Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "SC9863A//T310/T610/T618/T606/T612/T616/T760/T770/T820/S8000/T750/T765",
"vendor": "Unisoc (Shanghai) Technologies Co., Ltd.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "/"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In FDL1, there is a possible missing payload size check. This could lead to memory buffer overflow without requiring additional execution privileges."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-01T07:28:12.889Z",
"orgId": "63f92e9c-2193-4c24-98a9-93640392c3d3",
"shortName": "Unisoc"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.nccgroup.com/research-blog/there-s-another-hole-in-your-soc-unisoc-rom-vulnerabilities/"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "63f92e9c-2193-4c24-98a9-93640392c3d3",
"assignerShortName": "Unisoc",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-38693",
"datePublished": "2025-09-01T07:28:12.889Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-08-22T20:26:49.657Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-02T13:44:24.612Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2022-38693",
"date": "2026-09-18",
"epss": "0.008",
"percentile": "0.54989"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "SC9863A//T310/T610/T618/T606/T612/T616/T760/T770/T820/S8000/T750/T765",
"vendor": "Unisoc (Shanghai) Technologies Co., Ltd.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "/"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@unisoc.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In FDL1, there is a possible missing payload size check. This could lead to memory buffer overflow without requiring additional execution privileges."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2022-38693",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T04:57:02.057",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2022-38693",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-02T13:43:56.661632Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-09-01T08:15:32.100",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@unisoc.com",
"url": "https://www.nccgroup.com/research-blog/there-s-another-hole-in-your-soc-unisoc-rom-vulnerabilities/"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@unisoc.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-119"
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2025-09-03T08:34:08+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2022-38693",
"id": "CVE-2022-38693",
"initial_release_date": "2022-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "CVE-2022-38693",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2022/cve-2022-38693.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-38693",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-02T13:43:56.661632Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-119",
"description": "CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-02T13:44:18.012Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "SC9863A//T310/T610/T618/T606/T612/T616/T760/T770/T820/S8000/T750/T765",
"vendor": "Unisoc (Shanghai) Technologies Co., Ltd.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "/"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In FDL1, there is a possible missing payload size check. This could lead to memory buffer overflow without requiring additional execution privileges."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-01T07:28:12.889Z",
"orgId": "63f92e9c-2193-4c24-98a9-93640392c3d3",
"shortName": "Unisoc"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.nccgroup.com/research-blog/there-s-another-hole-in-your-soc-unisoc-rom-vulnerabilities/"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "63f92e9c-2193-4c24-98a9-93640392c3d3",
"assignerShortName": "Unisoc",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-38693",
"datePublished": "2025-09-01T07:28:12.889Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-08-22T20:26:49.657Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-02T13:44:24.612Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…