CVE-2021-20126 (GCVE-0-2021-20126)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2021-10-13 15:48 – Updated: 2024-08-03 17:30
VLAI
Summary
Draytek VigorConnect 1.6.0-B3 lacks cross-site request forgery protections and does not sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request.
CWE
  • Cross-Site Request Forgery
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
n/a Draytek VigorConnect Affected: 1.6.0-B3
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T17:30:07.598Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/research/tra-2021-42"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "Draytek VigorConnect",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.6.0-B3"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Draytek VigorConnect 1.6.0-B3 lacks cross-site request forgery protections and does not sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "Cross-Site Request Forgery",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2021-10-13T15:48:15.000Z",
        "orgId": "5ac1ecc2-367a-4d16-a0b2-35d495ddd0be",
        "shortName": "tenable"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/research/tra-2021-42"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "vulnreport@tenable.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2021-20126",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "Draytek VigorConnect",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "1.6.0-B3"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Draytek VigorConnect 1.6.0-B3 lacks cross-site request forgery protections and does not sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "Cross-Site Request Forgery"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://www.tenable.com/security/research/tra-2021-42",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/research/tra-2021-42"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "5ac1ecc2-367a-4d16-a0b2-35d495ddd0be",
    "assignerShortName": "tenable",
    "cveId": "CVE-2021-20126",
    "datePublished": "2021-10-13T15:48:15.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2020-12-17T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T17:30:07.598Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2021-20126",
      "date": "2026-09-22",
      "epss": "0.00632",
      "percentile": "0.48911"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "configurations": [
          {
            "nodes": [
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:draytek:vigorconnect:1.6.0:beta3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "CC518B3A-EDB0-434A-8CF5-026437FF5A13",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "Draytek VigorConnect 1.6.0-B3 lacks cross-site request forgery protections and does not sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "Draytek VigorConnect versi\u00f3n 1.6.0-B3, carece de protecciones contra vulnerabilidades de tipo cross-site request forgery y no comprueba suficientemente si una petici\u00f3n bien formada, v\u00e1lida y consistente fue proporcionada intencionadamente por el usuario que envi\u00f3 la petici\u00f3n"
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2021-20126",
        "lastModified": "2024-11-21T05:45:58.490",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV2": [
            {
              "acInsufInfo": false,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "cvssData": {
                "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
                "accessVector": "NETWORK",
                "authentication": "NONE",
                "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
                "baseScore": 6.8,
                "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
                "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
                "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
                "version": "2.0"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
              "impactScore": 6.4,
              "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
              "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
              "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary",
              "userInteractionRequired": true
            }
          ],
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
                "baseScore": 8.8,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
              "impactScore": 5.9,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary"
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2021-10-13T16:15:07.477",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "vulnreport@tenable.com",
            "tags": [
              "Exploit",
              "Third Party Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/research/tra-2021-42"
          },
          {
            "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
            "tags": [
              "Exploit",
              "Third Party Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/research/tra-2021-42"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "vulnreport@tenable.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Modified",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-352"
              }
            ],
            "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
            "type": "Primary"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "redhat_vex": {
      "current_release_date": "2026-03-27T15:03:41+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2021-20126",
      "id": "CVE-2021-20126",
      "initial_release_date": "2021-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "CVE-2021-20126",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2021/cve-2021-20126.json",
      "version": "3"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…