Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
Vulnerability from cleanstart
Multiple security vulnerabilities affect the prometheus-node-exporter-fips package. These issues are resolved in later releases. See references for individual vulnerability details.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "CleanStart",
"name": "prometheus-node-exporter-fips"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.9.1-r0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [],
"database_specific": {},
"details": "Multiple security vulnerabilities affect the prometheus-node-exporter-fips package. These issues are resolved in later releases. See references for individual vulnerability details.",
"id": "CLEANSTART-2026-FM92468",
"modified": "2026-06-02T10:37:54Z",
"published": "2026-06-08T14:46:02.477952Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/cleanstart-dev/cleanstart-security-advisories/tree/main/advisories/2026/CLEANSTART-2026-FM92468.json"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2022-46146"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-61727"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-61729"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33811"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33814"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-39817"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-39819"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-39820"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-39823"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-39825"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-39826"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-39836"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42499"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42501"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-cgrx-mc8f-2prm"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-f6x5-jh6r-wrfv"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-j5w8-q4qc-rx2x"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-vvgc-356p-c3xw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-46146"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-61727"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-61729"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33811"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33814"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39817"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39819"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39820"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39823"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39825"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39826"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39836"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42499"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42501"
}
],
"related": [],
"schema_version": "1.7.3",
"summary": "Security fixes for CVE-2022-46146, CVE-2025-61727, CVE-2025-61729, CVE-2026-33811, CVE-2026-33814, CVE-2026-39817, CVE-2026-39819, CVE-2026-39820, CVE-2026-39823, CVE-2026-39825, CVE-2026-39826, CVE-2026-39836, CVE-2026-42499, CVE-2026-42501, ghsa-cgrx-mc8f-2prm, ghsa-f6x5-jh6r-wrfv, ghsa-j5w8-q4qc-rx2x, ghsa-vvgc-356p-c3xw applied in versions: 1.10.2-r0, 1.10.2-r1, 1.11.0-r0, 1.5.0-r0, 1.9.1-r0",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2022-46146",
"CVE-2025-61727",
"CVE-2025-61729",
"CVE-2026-33811",
"CVE-2026-33814",
"CVE-2026-39817",
"CVE-2026-39819",
"CVE-2026-39820",
"CVE-2026-39823",
"CVE-2026-39825",
"CVE-2026-39826",
"CVE-2026-39836",
"CVE-2026-42499",
"CVE-2026-42501",
"ghsa-cgrx-mc8f-2prm",
"ghsa-f6x5-jh6r-wrfv",
"ghsa-j5w8-q4qc-rx2x",
"ghsa-vvgc-356p-c3xw"
]
}
CVE-2026-39826 (GCVE-0-2026-39826)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-07 19:41 – Updated: 2026-05-08 14:05- CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go standard library | html/template |
Affected:
0 , < 1.25.10
(semver)
Affected: 1.26.0-0 , < 1.26.3 (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-39826",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-08T14:04:40.842823Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-08T14:05:05.849Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pkg.go.dev",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "html/template",
"product": "html/template",
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "isJSType"
},
{
"name": "Template.Execute"
},
{
"name": "Template.ExecuteTemplate"
}
],
"vendor": "Go standard library",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.25.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.26.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.26.0-0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mundur (https://github.com/M0nd0R)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "If a trusted template author were to write a \u003cscript\u003e tag containing an empty \u0027type\u0027 attribute or a \u0027type\u0027 attribute with an ASCII whitespace, the execution of the template would incorrectly escape any data passed into the \u003cscript\u003e block."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
"lang": "en"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-07T19:41:19.138Z",
"orgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
"shortName": "Go"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://go.dev/issue/78981"
},
{
"url": "https://go.dev/cl/771180"
},
{
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/qcCIEXso47M"
},
{
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-4980"
}
],
"title": "Escaper bypass leads to XSS in html/template"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
"assignerShortName": "Go",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-39826",
"datePublished": "2026-05-07T19:41:19.138Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-07T18:13:03.528Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-08T14:05:05.849Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-39836 (GCVE-0-2026-39836)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-07 19:41 – Updated: 2026-05-08 21:30- CWE-248 - Uncaught Exception
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go standard library | net |
Affected:
0 , < 1.25.10
(semver)
Affected: 1.26.0-0 , < 1.26.3 (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-39836",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-08T16:36:25.079035Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-08T21:30:15.127Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pkg.go.dev",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "net",
"product": "net",
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "Resolver.lookupPort"
},
{
"name": "Resolver.lookupAddr"
},
{
"name": "Resolver.lookupTXT"
},
{
"name": "Resolver.lookupNS"
},
{
"name": "Resolver.lookupMX"
},
{
"name": "Resolver.lookupSRV"
},
{
"name": "Dial"
},
{
"name": "DialTimeout"
},
{
"name": "Dialer.Dial"
},
{
"name": "Dialer.DialContext"
},
{
"name": "Listen"
},
{
"name": "ListenConfig.Listen"
},
{
"name": "ListenConfig.ListenPacket"
},
{
"name": "ListenPacket"
},
{
"name": "LookupAddr"
},
{
"name": "LookupCNAME"
},
{
"name": "LookupHost"
},
{
"name": "LookupIP"
},
{
"name": "LookupMX"
},
{
"name": "LookupNS"
},
{
"name": "LookupPort"
},
{
"name": "LookupSRV"
},
{
"name": "LookupTXT"
},
{
"name": "ResolveIPAddr"
},
{
"name": "ResolveTCPAddr"
},
{
"name": "ResolveUDPAddr"
},
{
"name": "Resolver.LookupAddr"
},
{
"name": "Resolver.LookupCNAME"
},
{
"name": "Resolver.LookupHost"
},
{
"name": "Resolver.LookupIP"
},
{
"name": "Resolver.LookupIPAddr"
},
{
"name": "Resolver.LookupMX"
},
{
"name": "Resolver.LookupNS"
},
{
"name": "Resolver.LookupNetIP"
},
{
"name": "Resolver.LookupPort"
},
{
"name": "Resolver.LookupSRV"
},
{
"name": "Resolver.LookupTXT"
}
],
"vendor": "Go standard library",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.25.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.26.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.26.0-0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Dial and LookupPort functions panic on Windows when provided with an input containing a NUL (0)."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "CWE-248: Uncaught Exception",
"lang": "en"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-07T19:41:18.300Z",
"orgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
"shortName": "Go"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://go.dev/issue/79006"
},
{
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/qcCIEXso47M"
},
{
"url": "https://go.dev/cl/775320"
},
{
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-4971"
}
],
"title": "Panic in Dial and LookupPort when handling NUL byte on Windows in net"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
"assignerShortName": "Go",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-39836",
"datePublished": "2026-05-07T19:41:18.300Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-07T18:13:03.529Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-08T21:30:15.127Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-42499 (GCVE-0-2026-42499)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-07 19:41 – Updated: 2026-06-30 03:15| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://go.dev/issue/78987 | |
| https://go.dev/cl/771520 | |
| https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/qcC… | |
| https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-4977 | |
| https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42499 | vdb-entryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2467809 | issue-trackingx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/v… | x_sadp-csaf-vex |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33120 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33123 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33142 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33150 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go standard library | net/mail |
Affected:
0 , < 1.25.10
(semver)
Affected: 1.26.0-0 , < 1.26.3 (semver) |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0 |
cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.0::el9 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1 |
cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.1::el9 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2 |
cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.2::el9 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3 |
cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.3::el9 |
|
| Red Hat | Assisted Installer for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 2 |
cpe:/a:redhat:assisted_installer:2 |
|
| Red Hat | cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift |
cpe:/a:redhat:cert_manager:1 |
|
| Red Hat | Confidential Compute Attestation |
cpe:/a:redhat:confidential_compute_attestation:1 |
|
| Red Hat | Cryostat 4 |
cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4 |
|
| Red Hat | Custom Metric Autoscaler operator for Red Hat Openshift |
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_custom_metrics_autoscaler:2 |
|
| Red Hat | External Secrets Operator for Red Hat OpenShift |
cpe:/a:redhat:external_secrets_operator:1 |
|
| Red Hat | File Integrity Operator |
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_file_integrity_operator:1 |
|
| Red Hat | Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift |
cpe:/a:redhat:logging:6 |
|
| Red Hat | Logical Volume Manager Storage |
cpe:/a:redhat:lvms:4 |
|
| Red Hat | Migration Toolkit for Applications 8 |
cpe:/a:redhat:migration_toolkit_applications:8 |
|
| Red Hat | Migration Toolkit for Containers |
cpe:/a:redhat:rhmt:1 |
|
| Red Hat | Multiarch Tuning Operator |
cpe:/a:redhat:multiarch_tuning_operator |
|
| Red Hat | Network Observability Operator |
cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1 |
|
| Red Hat | OpenShift API for Data Protection |
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_api_data_protection:1 |
|
| Red Hat | OpenShift Developer Tools and Services |
cpe:/a:redhat:ocp_tools |
|
| Red Hat | OpenShift Lightspeed |
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_lightspeed |
|
| Red Hat | OpenShift Pipelines |
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_pipelines:1 |
|
| Red Hat | OpenShift Serverless |
cpe:/a:redhat:serverless:1 |
|
| Red Hat | OpenShift Service Mesh 2 |
cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:2 |
|
| Red Hat | OpenShift Service Mesh 3 |
cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3 |
|
| Red Hat | Power monitoring for Red Hat OpenShift |
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_power_monitoring |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4 |
cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Ceph Storage 5 |
cpe:/a:redhat:ceph_storage:5 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Ceph Storage 6 |
cpe:/a:redhat:ceph_storage:6 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Ceph Storage 9 |
cpe:/a:redhat:ceph_storage:9 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Certification Program for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 |
cpe:/a:redhat:certifications:9 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Developer Hub |
cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Hardened Images |
cpe:/a:redhat:hummingbird:1 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) |
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Cluster Manager CLI |
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_cluster_manager_cli:1 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 |
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4 |
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_data_foundation:4 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces |
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_devspaces:3 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Dev Workspaces Operator |
cpe:/a:redhat:devworkspace |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift distributed tracing 3 |
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_distributed_tracing:3 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift for Windows Containers |
cpe:/a:redhat:windows_machine_config |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift GitOps |
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_gitops:1 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4 |
cpe:/a:redhat:container_native_virtualization:4 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenStack Platform 18.0 |
cpe:/a:redhat:openstack:18.0 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Quay 3 |
cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Service Interconnect 1 |
cpe:/a:redhat:service_interconnect:1 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Service Interconnect 2 |
cpe:/a:redhat:service_interconnect:2 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer |
cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_artifact_signer:1 |
|
| Red Hat | Security Profiles Operator |
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_security_profiles_operator:1 |
|
| Red Hat | Zero Trust Workload Identity Manager |
cpe:/a:redhat:zero_trust_workload_identity_manager:1 |
|
| Red Hat | Zero Trust Workload Identity Manager - Tech Preview |
cpe:/a:redhat:zero_trust_workload_identity_manager:0 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2 |
cpe:/a:redhat:openstack:16.2 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 |
cpe:/a:redhat:openstack:17.1 |
|
| Red Hat | Gatekeeper 3 |
cpe:/a:redhat:gatekeeper:3 |
|
| Red Hat | Multicluster Engine for Kubernetes |
cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine |
|
| Red Hat | Multicluster Global Hub |
cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_globalhub |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 |
cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 |
cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Edge Manager 1 |
cpe:/a:redhat:edge_manager:1 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3 |
cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Lightspeed for Runtimes Operator |
cpe:/a:redhat:lightspeed_for_runtimes:1 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Satellite 6 |
cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-42499",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-08T16:55:28.873015Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-08T21:29:59.662Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.0::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.1::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:assisted_installer:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Assisted Installer for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cert_manager:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:confidential_compute_attestation:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Confidential Compute Attestation",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_custom_metrics_autoscaler:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Custom Metric Autoscaler operator for Red Hat Openshift",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:external_secrets_operator:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "External Secrets Operator for Red Hat OpenShift",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_file_integrity_operator:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "File Integrity Operator",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:logging:6"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:lvms:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Logical Volume Manager Storage",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:migration_toolkit_applications:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Applications 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhmt:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Containers",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multiarch_tuning_operator"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Multiarch Tuning Operator",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Network Observability Operator",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_api_data_protection:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift API for Data Protection",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ocp_tools"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Developer Tools and Services",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_lightspeed"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Lightspeed",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_pipelines:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Pipelines",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:serverless:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Serverless",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Service Mesh 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Service Mesh 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_power_monitoring"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Power monitoring for Red Hat OpenShift",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ceph_storage:5"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ceph Storage 5",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ceph_storage:6"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ceph Storage 6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ceph_storage:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ceph Storage 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:certifications:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Certification Program for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:hummingbird:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Hardened Images",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_cluster_manager_cli:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Cluster Manager CLI",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_data_foundation:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_devspaces:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:devworkspace"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Dev Workspaces Operator",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_distributed_tracing:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift distributed tracing 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:windows_machine_config"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift for Windows Containers",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_gitops:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift GitOps",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:container_native_virtualization:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openstack:18.0"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenStack Platform 18.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_interconnect:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Service Interconnect 1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_interconnect:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Service Interconnect 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_artifact_signer:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_security_profiles_operator:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Security Profiles Operator",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:zero_trust_workload_identity_manager:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Zero Trust Workload Identity Manager",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:zero_trust_workload_identity_manager:0"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Zero Trust Workload Identity Manager - Tech Preview",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openstack:16.2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openstack:17.1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:gatekeeper:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Gatekeeper 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Multicluster Engine for Kubernetes",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_globalhub"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Multicluster Global Hub",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:edge_manager:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Red Hat Edge Manager 1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:lightspeed_for_runtimes:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Red Hat Lightspeed for Runtimes Operator",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-07T19:41:18.615Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in the `net/mail` package within the Go standard library. A remote attacker could provide specially crafted, pathological email addresses. When these malformed email addresses are parsed by the `consumePhrase` function, it can lead to excessive resource consumption due to quadratic string concatenation, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) condition."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1046",
"description": "Creation of Immutable Text Using String Concatenation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-30T03:15:52.901Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42499"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2467809",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2467809"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-42499.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33120"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33123"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33142"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33150"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:33120: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:33123: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:33142: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:33150: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-07T20:00:51.685Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-07T19:41:18.615Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "net/mail: golang: net/mail: Denial of Service via pathological email address parsing",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability."
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pkg.go.dev",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "net/mail",
"product": "net/mail",
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "addrParser.consumePhrase"
},
{
"name": "AddressParser.Parse"
},
{
"name": "AddressParser.ParseList"
},
{
"name": "Header.AddressList"
},
{
"name": "ParseAddress"
},
{
"name": "ParseAddressList"
}
],
"vendor": "Go standard library",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.25.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.26.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.26.0-0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Pathological inputs could cause DoS through consumePhrase when parsing an email address according to RFC 5322."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity",
"lang": "en"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-07T19:41:18.615Z",
"orgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
"shortName": "Go"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://go.dev/issue/78987"
},
{
"url": "https://go.dev/cl/771520"
},
{
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/qcCIEXso47M"
},
{
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-4977"
}
],
"title": "Quadratic string concatenation in consumePhrase in net/mail"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
"assignerShortName": "Go",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-42499",
"datePublished": "2026-05-07T19:41:18.615Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-28T00:21:12.791Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-30T03:15:52.901Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-42501 (GCVE-0-2026-42501)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-07 19:41 – Updated: 2026-05-08 15:48- CWE-347 - Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go toolchain | cmd/go |
Affected:
0 , < 1.25.10
(semver)
Affected: 1.26.0-0 , < 1.26.3 (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-42501",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-08T15:48:05.053316Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"description": "CWE-347 Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-08T15:48:47.404Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pkg.go.dev",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "cmd/go",
"product": "cmd/go",
"vendor": "Go toolchain",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.25.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.26.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.26.0-0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mundur (https://github.com/M0nd0R)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A malicious module proxy can exploit a flaw in the go command\u0027s validation of module checksums to bypass checksum database validation. This vulnerability affects any user using an untrusted module proxy (GOMODPROXY) or checksum database (GOSUMDB). A malicious module proxy can serve altered versions of the Go toolchain. When selecting a different version of the Go toolchain than the currently installed toolchain (due to the GOTOOLCHAIN environment variable, or a go.work or go.mod with a toolchain line), the go command will download and execute a toolchain provided by the module proxy. A malicious module proxy can bypass checksum database validation for this downloaded toolchain. Since this vulnerability affects the security of toolchain downloads, setting GOTOOLCHAIN to a fixed version is not sufficient. You must upgrade your base Go toolchain. The go tool always validates the hash of a toolchain before executing it, so fixed versions will refuse to execute any cached, altered versions of the toolchain. The go tool trusts go.sum files to contain accurate hashes of the current module\u0027s dependencies. A malicious proxy exploiting this vulnerability to serve an altered module will have caused an incorrect hash to be recorded in the go.sum. Users who have configured a non-trusted GOPROXY can determine if they have been affected by running \"rm go.sum ; go mod tidy ; go mod verify\", which will revalidate all dependencies of the current module. The specific flaw in more detail: The go command consults the checksum database to validate downloaded modules, when a module is not listed in the go.sum file. It verifies that the module hash reported by the checksum database matches the hash of the downloaded module. If, however, the checksum database returns a successful response that contains no entry for the module, the go command incorrectly permitted validation to succeed. A module proxy may mirror or proxy the checksum database, in which case the go command will not connect to the checksum database directly. Checksums reported by the checksum database are cryptographically signed, so a malicious proxy cannot alter the reported checksum for a module. However, a proxy which returns an empty checksum response, or a checksum response for an unrelated module, could cause the go command to proceed as if a downloaded module has been validated."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
"lang": "en"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-07T19:41:19.691Z",
"orgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
"shortName": "Go"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://go.dev/cl/775321"
},
{
"url": "https://go.dev/issue/79070"
},
{
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/qcCIEXso47M"
},
{
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-4984"
}
],
"title": "Malicious module proxy can bypass checksum database in cmd/go"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
"assignerShortName": "Go",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-42501",
"datePublished": "2026-05-07T19:41:19.691Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-28T00:21:12.791Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-08T15:48:47.404Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
GHSA-CGRX-MC8F-2PRM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-05 18:40 – Updated: 2025-11-18 18:38Impact
This attack is primarily a more sophisticated version of CVE-2019-19921, which was a flaw which allowed an attacker to trick runc into writing the LSM process labels for a container process into a dummy tmpfs file and thus not apply the correct LSM labels to the container process. The mitigation runc applied for CVE-2019-19921 was fairly limited and effectively only caused runc to verify that when runc writes LSM labels that those labels are actual procfs files.
Rather than using a fake tmpfs file for /proc/self/attr/<label>, an attacker could instead (through various means) make /proc/self/attr/<label> reference a real procfs file, but one that would still be a no-op (such as /proc/self/sched). This would have the same effect but would clear the "is a procfs file" check. Runc is aware that this kind of attack would be possible (even going so far as to discuss this publicly as "future work" at conferences), and runc is working on a far more comprehensive mitigation of this attack, but this security issue was disclosed before runc could complete this work.
In all known versions of runc, an attacker can trick runc into misdirecting writes to /proc to other procfs files through the use of a racing container with shared mounts (runc has also verified this attack is possible to exploit using a standard Dockerfile with docker buildx build as that also permits triggering parallel execution of containers with custom shared mounts configured). This redirect could be through symbolic links in a tmpfs or theoretically other methods such as regular bind-mounts.
Note that while /proc/self/attr/<label> was the example used above (which is LSM-specific), this issue affect all writes to /proc in runc and thus also affects sysctls (written to /proc/sys/...) and some other APIs.
Additional Impacts
While investigating this issue, runc discovered that another risk with these redirected writes is that they could be redirected to dangerous files such as /proc/sysrq-trigger rather than just no-op files like /proc/self/sched. For instance, the default AppArmor profile name in Docker is docker-default, which when written to /proc/sysrq-trigger would cause the host system to crash.
When this was discovered, runc conducted an audit of other write operations within runc and found several possible areas where runc could be used as a semi-arbitrary write gadget when combined with the above race attacks. The most concerning attack scenario was the configuration of sysctls. Because the contents of the sysctl are free-form text, an attacker could use a misdirected write to write to /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern and break out of the container (as described in CVE-2025-31133, kernel upcalls are not namespaced and so coredump helpers will run with complete root privileges on the host). Even if the attacker cannot configure custom sysctls, a valid sysctl string (when redirected to /proc/sysrq-trigger) can easily cause the machine to hang.
Note that the fact that this attack allows you to disable LSM labels makes it a very useful attack to combine with CVE-2025-31133 (as one of the only mitigations available to most users for that issue is AppArmor, and this attack would let you bypass that). However, the misdirected write issue above means that you could also achieve most of the same goals without needing to chain together attacks.
Patches
This advisory is being published as part of a set of three advisories:
- CVE-2025-31133
- CVE-2025-52881
- CVE-2025-52565
The patches fixing this issue have accordingly been combined into a single patchset. The following patches from that patchset resolve the issues in this advisory:
- db19bbed5348 ("internal/sys: add VerifyInode helper")
- 6fc191449109 ("internal: move utils.MkdirAllInRoot to internal/pathrs")
- ff94f9991bd3 ("*: switch to safer securejoin.Reopen")
- 44a0fcf685db ("go.mod: update to github.com/cyphar/filepath-securejoin@v0.5.0")
- 77889b56db93 ("internal: add wrappers for securejoin.Proc*")
- fdcc9d3cad2f ("apparmor: use safe procfs API for labels")
- ff6fe1324663 ("utils: use safe procfs for /proc/self/fd loop code")
- b3dd1bc562ed ("utils: remove unneeded EnsureProcHandle")
- 77d217c7c377 ("init: write sysctls using safe procfs API")
- 435cc81be6b7 ("init: use securejoin for /proc/self/setgroups")
- d61fd29d854b ("libct/system: use securejoin for /proc/$pid/stat")
- 4b37cd93f86e ("libct: align param type for mountCgroupV1/V2 functions")
- d40b3439a961 ("rootfs: switch to fd-based handling of mountpoint targets")
- ed6b1693b8b3 ("selinux: use safe procfs API for labels")
-
Please note that this patch includes a private patch for
github.com/opencontainers/selinuxthat could not be made public through a public pull request (as it would necessarily disclose this embargoed security issue).The patch includes a complete copy of the forked code and a
replacedirective (as well asgo mod vendorapplied), which should still work with downstream build systems. If you cannot apply this patch, you can safely drop it -- some of the other patches in this series should block these kinds of racing mount attacks entirely.See https://github.com/opencontainers/selinux/pull/237 for the upstream patch. * 3f925525b44d ("rootfs: re-allow dangling symlinks in mount targets") * a41366e74080 ("openat2: improve resilience on busy systems")
runc 1.2.8, 1.3.3, and 1.4.0-rc.3 have been released and all contain fixes for these issues. As per runc's new release model, runc 1.1.x and earlier are no longer supported and thus have not been patched.
Mitigations
-
Do not run untrusted container images from unknown or unverified sources.
-
For the basic no-op attack, this attack allows a container process to run with the same LSM labels as
runc. For most AppArmor deployments this means it will beunconfined, and for SELinux it will likely becontainer_runtime_t. Runc has not conducted in-depth testing of the impact on SELinux -- it is possible that it provides some reasonable protection but it seems likely that an attacker could cause harm to systems even with such an SELinux setup. -
For the more involved redirect and write gadget attacks, unfortunately most LSM profiles (including the standard container-selinux profiles) provide the container runtime access to sysctl files (including
/proc/sysrq-trigger) and so LSMs likely do not provide much protection against these attacks. -
Using rootless containers provides some protection against these kinds of bugs (privileged writes in runc being redirected) -- by having runc itself be an unprivileged process, in general you would expect the impact scope of a runc bug to be less severe as it would only have the privileges afforded to the host user which spawned runc. For this particular bug, the privilege escalation caused by the inadvertent write issue is entirely mitigated with rootless containers because the unprivileged user that the
runcprocess is executing as cannot write to the aforementioned procfs files (even intentionally).
Other Runtimes
As this vulnerability boils down to a fairly easy-to-make logic bug, runc has provided information to other OCI (crun, youki) and non-OCI (LXC) container runtimes about this vulnerability.
Based on discussions with other runtimes, it seems that crun and youki may have similar security issues and will release a co-ordinated security release along with runc. LXC appears to use the host's /proc for all procfs operations, and so is likely not vulnerable to this issue (this is a trade-off -- runc uses the container's procfs to avoid CVE-2016-9962-style attacks).
Credits
Thanks to Li Fubang (@lifubang from acmcoder.com, CIIC) and Tõnis Tiigi (@tonistiigi from Docker) for both independently discovering this vulnerability, as well as Aleksa Sarai (@cyphar from SUSE) for the original research into this class of security issues and solutions.
Additional thanks go to Tõnis Tiigi for finding some very useful exploit templates for these kinds of race attacks using docker buildx build.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.2.7"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/opencontainers/runc"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.2.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.12.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/opencontainers/selinux"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.13.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.3.2"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/opencontainers/runc"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.3.0-rc.1"
},
{
"fixed": "1.3.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.4.0-rc.2"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/opencontainers/runc"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.4.0-rc.1"
},
{
"fixed": "1.4.0-rc.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-52881"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-363",
"CWE-61"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-11-05T18:40:40Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-06T21:15:42Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact ###\n\nThis attack is primarily a more sophisticated version of CVE-2019-19921, which was a flaw which allowed an attacker to trick runc into writing the LSM process labels for a container process into a dummy `tmpfs` file and thus not apply the correct LSM labels to the container process. The mitigation runc applied for CVE-2019-19921 was fairly limited and effectively only caused runc to verify that when runc writes LSM labels that those labels are actual procfs files.\n\nRather than using a fake `tmpfs` file for `/proc/self/attr/\u003clabel\u003e`, an attacker could instead (through various means) make `/proc/self/attr/\u003clabel\u003e` reference a real `procfs` file, but one that would still be a no-op (such as `/proc/self/sched`). This would have the same effect but would clear the \"is a procfs file\" check. Runc is aware that this kind of attack would be possible (even going so far as to discuss this publicly as \"future work\" at conferences), and runc is working on a far more comprehensive mitigation of this attack, but this security issue was disclosed before runc could complete this work.\n\nIn all known versions of runc, an attacker can trick runc into misdirecting writes to `/proc` to other procfs files through the use of a racing container with shared mounts (runc has also verified this attack is possible to exploit using a standard Dockerfile with `docker buildx build` as that also permits triggering parallel execution of containers with custom shared mounts configured). This redirect could be through symbolic links in a `tmpfs` or theoretically other methods such as regular bind-mounts.\n\nNote that while `/proc/self/attr/\u003clabel\u003e` was the example used above (which is LSM-specific), this issue affect all writes to `/proc` in runc and thus also affects sysctls (written to `/proc/sys/...`) and some other APIs.\n\n#### Additional Impacts ####\n\nWhile investigating this issue, runc discovered that another risk with these redirected writes is that they could be redirected to dangerous files such as `/proc/sysrq-trigger` rather than just no-op files like `/proc/self/sched`. For instance, the default AppArmor profile name in Docker is `docker-default`, which when written to `/proc/sysrq-trigger` would cause the host system to crash.\n\nWhen this was discovered, runc conducted an audit of other write operations within runc and found several possible areas where runc could be used as a semi-arbitrary write gadget when combined with the above race attacks. The most concerning attack scenario was the configuration of sysctls. Because the contents of the sysctl are free-form text, an attacker could use a misdirected write to write to `/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern` and break out of the container (as described in CVE-2025-31133, kernel upcalls are not namespaced and so coredump helpers will run with complete root privileges on the host). Even if the attacker cannot configure custom sysctls, a valid sysctl string (when redirected to `/proc/sysrq-trigger`) can easily cause the machine to hang.\n\nNote that the fact that this attack allows you to disable LSM labels makes it a very useful attack to combine with CVE-2025-31133 (as one of the only mitigations available to most users for that issue is AppArmor, and this attack would let you bypass that). However, the misdirected write issue above means that you could also achieve most of the same goals without needing to chain together attacks.\n\n### Patches ###\n\nThis advisory is being published as part of a set of three advisories:\n\n * CVE-2025-31133\n * CVE-2025-52881\n * CVE-2025-52565\n\nThe patches fixing this issue have accordingly been combined into a single patchset. The following patches from that patchset resolve the issues in this advisory:\n\n * db19bbed5348 (\"internal/sys: add VerifyInode helper\")\n * 6fc191449109 (\"internal: move utils.MkdirAllInRoot to internal/pathrs\")\n * ff94f9991bd3 (\"*: switch to safer securejoin.Reopen\")\n * 44a0fcf685db (\"go.mod: update to github.com/cyphar/filepath-securejoin@v0.5.0\")\n * 77889b56db93 (\"internal: add wrappers for securejoin.Proc*\")\n * fdcc9d3cad2f (\"apparmor: use safe procfs API for labels\")\n * ff6fe1324663 (\"utils: use safe procfs for /proc/self/fd loop code\")\n * b3dd1bc562ed (\"utils: remove unneeded EnsureProcHandle\")\n * 77d217c7c377 (\"init: write sysctls using safe procfs API\")\n * 435cc81be6b7 (\"init: use securejoin for /proc/self/setgroups\")\n * d61fd29d854b (\"libct/system: use securejoin for /proc/$pid/stat\")\n * 4b37cd93f86e (\"libct: align param type for mountCgroupV1/V2 functions\")\n * d40b3439a961 (\"rootfs: switch to fd-based handling of mountpoint targets\")\n * ed6b1693b8b3 (\"selinux: use safe procfs API for labels\")\n - Please note that this patch includes a private patch for `github.com/opencontainers/selinux` that could not be made public through a public pull request (as it would necessarily disclose this embargoed security issue).\n\n The patch includes a complete copy of the forked code and a `replace` directive (as well as `go mod vendor` applied), which should still work with downstream build systems. If you cannot apply this patch, you can safely drop it -- some of the other patches in this series should block these kinds of racing mount attacks entirely.\n\n See https://github.com/opencontainers/selinux/pull/237 for the upstream patch.\n * 3f925525b44d (\"rootfs: re-allow dangling symlinks in mount targets\")\n * a41366e74080 (\"openat2: improve resilience on busy systems\")\n\nrunc 1.2.8, 1.3.3, and 1.4.0-rc.3 have been released and all contain fixes for these issues. As per [runc\u0027s new release model][RELEASES.md], runc 1.1.x and earlier are no longer supported and thus have not been patched.\n\n[CVE-2025-31133]: https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/security/advisories/GHSA-9493-h29p-rfm2\n[CVE-2025-52565]: https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/security/advisories/GHSA-qw9x-cqr3-wc7r\n[CVE-2025-52881]: https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/security/advisories/GHSA-cgrx-mc8f-2prm\n[RELEASES.md]: https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/blob/v1.4.0-rc.2/RELEASES.md\n\n### Mitigations ###\n\n * Do not run untrusted container images from unknown or unverified sources.\n\n * For the basic no-op attack, this attack allows a container process to run with the same LSM labels as `runc`. For most AppArmor deployments this means it will be `unconfined`, and for SELinux it will likely be `container_runtime_t`. Runc has not conducted in-depth testing of the impact on SELinux -- it is possible that it provides some reasonable protection but it seems likely that an attacker could cause harm to systems even with such an SELinux setup.\n\n * For the more involved redirect and write gadget attacks, unfortunately most LSM profiles (including the standard container-selinux profiles) provide the container runtime access to sysctl files (including `/proc/sysrq-trigger`) and so LSMs likely do not provide much protection against these attacks.\n\n * Using rootless containers provides some protection against these kinds of bugs (privileged writes in runc being redirected) -- by having runc itself be an unprivileged process, in general you would expect the impact scope of a runc bug to be less severe as it would only have the privileges afforded to the host user which spawned runc. For this particular bug, the privilege escalation caused by the inadvertent write issue is entirely mitigated with rootless containers because the unprivileged user that the `runc` process is executing as cannot write to the aforementioned procfs files (even intentionally).\n\n### Other Runtimes ###\n\nAs this vulnerability boils down to a fairly easy-to-make logic bug, runc has provided information to other OCI (crun, youki) and non-OCI (LXC) container runtimes about this vulnerability.\n\nBased on discussions with other runtimes, it seems that crun and youki may have similar security issues and will release a co-ordinated security release along with runc. LXC appears to use the host\u0027s `/proc` for all procfs operations, and so is likely not vulnerable to this issue (this is a trade-off -- runc uses the container\u0027s procfs to avoid CVE-2016-9962-style attacks).\n\n[CVE-2016-9962]: https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Jan/21\n\n### Credits ###\n\nThanks to Li Fubang (@lifubang from acmcoder.com, CIIC) and T\u00f5nis Tiigi (@tonistiigi from Docker) for both independently discovering this vulnerability, as well as Aleksa Sarai (@cyphar from SUSE) for the original research into this class of security issues and solutions.\n\nAdditional thanks go to T\u00f5nis Tiigi for finding some very useful exploit templates for these kinds of race attacks using `docker buildx build`.",
"id": "GHSA-cgrx-mc8f-2prm",
"modified": "2025-11-18T18:38:01Z",
"published": "2025-11-05T18:40:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/security/advisories/GHSA-qw9x-cqr3-wc7r"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/security/advisories/GHSA-fh74-hm69-rqjw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/security/advisories/GHSA-cgrx-mc8f-2prm"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/security/advisories/GHSA-9493-h29p-rfm2"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-52881"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/selinux/pull/237"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/ff94f9991bd32076c871ef0ad8bc1b763458e480"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/ff6fe1324663538167eca8b3d3eec61e1bd4fa51"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/fdcc9d3cad2f85954a241ccb910a61aaa1ef47f3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/ed6b1693b8b3ae7eb0250a7e76fc888cdacf98c1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/db19bbed5348847da433faa9d69e9f90192bfa64"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/d61fd29d854b416feaaf128bf650325cd2182165"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/d40b3439a9614a86e87b81a94c6811ec6fa2d7d2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/b3dd1bc562ed9996d1a0f249e056c16624046d28"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/a41366e74080fa9f26a2cd3544e2801449697322"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/77d217c7c3775d8ca5af89e477e81568ef4572db"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/77889b56db939c323d29d1130f28f9aea2edb544"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/6fc191449109ea14bb7d61238f24a33fe08c651f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/4b37cd93f86e72feac866442988b549b5b7bf3e6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/44a0fcf685db051c80b8c269812bb177f5802c58"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/435cc81be6b79cdec73b4002c0dae549b2f6ae6d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/3f925525b44d247e390e529e772a0dc0c0bc3557"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://youtu.be/tGseJW_uBB8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/cyphar/filepath-securejoin/pathrs-lite/procfs"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://youtu.be/y1PaBzxwRWQ"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/selinux/releases/tag/v1.13.0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/blob/v1.4.0-rc.2/RELEASES.md"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/a41366e74080fa9f26a2cd3544e2801449697322"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/fdcc9d3cad2f85954a241ccb910a61aaa1ef47f3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "runc container escape and denial of service due to arbitrary write gadgets and procfs write redirects"
}
GHSA-F6X5-JH6R-WRFV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-19 23:16 – Updated: 2025-11-20 16:35SSH Agent servers do not validate the size of messages when processing new identity requests, which may cause the program to panic if the message is malformed due to an out of bounds read.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "golang.org/x/crypto"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.45.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-47914"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-125"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-11-19T23:16:40Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-19T21:15:50Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "SSH Agent servers do not validate the size of messages when processing new identity requests, which may cause the program to panic if the message is malformed due to an out of bounds read.",
"id": "GHSA-f6x5-jh6r-wrfv",
"modified": "2025-11-20T16:35:18Z",
"published": "2025-11-19T23:16:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-47914"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://go.dev/cl/721960"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://go.dev/issue/76364"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://go.googlesource.com/crypto"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/w-oX3UxNcZA"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-4135"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "golang.org/x/crypto/ssh/agent vulnerable to panic if message is malformed due to out of bounds read"
}
GHSA-J5W8-Q4QC-RX2X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-19 23:01 – Updated: 2025-11-19 23:01SSH servers parsing GSSAPI authentication requests do not validate the number of mechanisms specified in the request, allowing an attacker to cause unbounded memory consumption.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "golang.org/x/crypto"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.45.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-58181"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-11-19T23:01:20Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-19T21:15:50Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "SSH servers parsing GSSAPI authentication requests do not validate the number of mechanisms specified in the request, allowing an attacker to cause unbounded memory consumption.",
"id": "GHSA-j5w8-q4qc-rx2x",
"modified": "2025-11-19T23:01:20Z",
"published": "2025-11-19T23:01:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-58181"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://go.dev/cl/721961"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://go.dev/issue/76363"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/w-oX3UxNcZA"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-4134"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "golang.org/x/crypto/ssh allows an attacker to cause unbounded memory consumption"
}
GHSA-VVGC-356P-C3XW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-16 19:22 – Updated: 2025-05-17 18:49The tokenizer incorrectly interprets tags with unquoted attribute values that end with a solidus character (/) as self-closing. When directly using Tokenizer, this can result in such tags incorrectly being marked as self-closing, and when using the Parse functions, this can result in content following such tags as being placed in the wrong scope during DOM construction, but only when tags are in foreign content (e.g. , , etc contexts).
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "golang.org/x/net"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.38.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-22872"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-04-16T19:22:51Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-16T18:16:04Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The tokenizer incorrectly interprets tags with unquoted attribute values that end with a solidus character (/) as self-closing. When directly using Tokenizer, this can result in such tags incorrectly being marked as self-closing, and when using the Parse functions, this can result in content following such tags as being placed in the wrong scope during DOM construction, but only when tags are in foreign content (e.g. \u003cmath\u003e, \u003csvg\u003e, etc contexts).",
"id": "GHSA-vvgc-356p-c3xw",
"modified": "2025-05-17T18:49:25Z",
"published": "2025-04-16T19:22:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22872"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://go.dev/cl/662715"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://go.dev/issue/73070"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/ezSKR9vqbqA"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-3595"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250516-0007"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "golang.org/x/net vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.