CERTFR-2026-AVI-1477

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-11-06 - Updated: 2026-11-06

Une vulnérabilité a été découverte dans les produits Mitel. Elle permet à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance.

Solutions

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
Mitel OpenScape SBC OpenScape SBC versions antérieures à 11R3.4.5 (disponibilité du correctif non annoncé)
Mitel MiVoice Business Mitel versions 10.6.0.7 et antérieures
Mitel OpenScape Contact Center OpenScape Contact Center versions 12R0 à 12R0FR7
Mitel OpenScape SESAP OpenScape SESAP versions 2 R1.1.9 et antérieures
Mitel OpenScape Xpert OpenScape Xpert versions 9 R0.2.0 et antérieures
Mitel OpenScape Endpoint Management OpenScape Endpoint Management versions 1 R2.5.1 et antérieures
Mitel MiVoice Business MiVoice Business Solution Virtual Instance versions 2.1.0.9 et antérieures
References
Bulletin de sécurité Mitel 2026-0010 2026-10-28 vendor-advisory

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "OpenScape SBC versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 11R3.4.5 (disponibilit\u00e9 du correctif non annonc\u00e9)",
      "product": {
        "name": "OpenScape SBC",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Mitel",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Mitel versions 10.6.0.7 et ant\u00e9rieures",
      "product": {
        "name": "MiVoice Business",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Mitel",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "OpenScape Contact Center versions 12R0 \u00e0 12R0FR7",
      "product": {
        "name": "OpenScape Contact Center",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Mitel",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "OpenScape SESAP versions 2 R1.1.9 et ant\u00e9rieures",
      "product": {
        "name": "OpenScape SESAP",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Mitel",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "OpenScape Xpert versions 9 R0.2.0 et ant\u00e9rieures",
      "product": {
        "name": "OpenScape Xpert",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Mitel",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "OpenScape Endpoint Management versions 1 R2.5.1 et ant\u00e9rieures",
      "product": {
        "name": "OpenScape Endpoint Management",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Mitel",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "MiVoice Business Solution Virtual Instance versions 2.1.0.9 et ant\u00e9rieures",
      "product": {
        "name": "MiVoice Business",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Mitel",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": "",
  "content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2026-111497",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-111497"
    }
  ],
  "initial_release_date": "2026-11-06T00:00:00",
  "last_revision_date": "2026-11-06T00:00:00",
  "links": [],
  "reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-1477",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "Version initiale",
      "revision_date": "2026-11-06T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couverte dans les produits Mitel. Elle permet \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance.",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans les produits Mitel",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": "2026-10-28",
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Mitel 2026-0010",
      "url": "https://www.mitel.com/support/security-advisories/mitel-product-security-advisory-misa-2026-0010"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.