alsa-2026:41892
Vulnerability from osv_almalinux
Published
2026-07-20 00:00
Modified
2026-07-20 11:48
Summary
Important: libtiff security, bug fix, and enhancement update
Details

The libtiff packages contain a library of functions for manipulating Tagged Image File Format (TIFF) files.

Security Fix(es):

  • libtiff: TIFFRasterScanlineSize64 produce too-big size and could cause OOM (CVE-2023-52355)
  • libtiff: libtiff: Heap-based buffer overflow via crafted PixarLog-compressed TIFF image (CVE-2026-12912)

Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):

  • Reintroduce the tiffcp -i option (JIRA:AlmaLinux-185328)

For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.

References
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "AlmaLinux:10",
        "name": "libtiff"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.6.0-8.el10_2.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "AlmaLinux:10",
        "name": "libtiff-devel"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.6.0-8.el10_2.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "AlmaLinux:10",
        "name": "libtiff-tools"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.6.0-8.el10_2.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "details": "The libtiff packages contain a library of functions for manipulating Tagged Image File Format (TIFF) files.  \n\nSecurity Fix(es):  \n\n  * libtiff: TIFFRasterScanlineSize64 produce too-big size and could cause OOM (CVE-2023-52355)\n  * libtiff: libtiff: Heap-based buffer overflow via crafted PixarLog-compressed TIFF image (CVE-2026-12912)\n\n\nBug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):  \n\n  * Reintroduce the `tiffcp -i` option (JIRA:AlmaLinux-185328)\n\n\nFor more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.\n",
  "id": "ALSA-2026:41892",
  "modified": "2026-07-20T11:48:35Z",
  "published": "2026-07-20T00:00:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:41892"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-52355"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-12912"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2251326"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2492871"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://errata.almalinux.org/10/ALSA-2026-41892.html"
    }
  ],
  "related": [
    "CVE-2023-52355",
    "CVE-2026-12912"
  ],
  "summary": "Important: libtiff security, bug fix, and enhancement update"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.