GHSA-Q2HR-2G5M-VWHR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-29 23:45 – Updated: 2026-09-29 23:45
VLAI
Summary
brace-expansion: Quadratic-time expansion of the `{a},b}` rewrite causes CPU denial of service
Details

Summary

Expanding {a},b}-shaped input takes time quadratic in the number of literal } characters, blocking the event loop.

Bash preserves a quirk where a brace group followed by a comma set still expands ({a},b}). The parser implements this by rewriting the string and restarting the scan. Each pass absorbs exactly one } and re-scans from the beginning, so n trailing braces cost n full passes.

Reproduction

const build = n => '{a}' + '}'.repeat(n) + ',z}'

for (const n of [8000, 16000, 32000, 64000, 128000]) {
  const t = Date.now()
  expand(build(n))
  console.log(n, Date.now() - t + 'ms')
}
n input time results
8,000 8 KB 110 ms 2
16,000 16 KB 446 ms 2
32,000 32 KB 1.7 s 2
64,000 64 KB 6.9 s 2
128,000 128 KB 27.7 s 2

ms/n^2 is flat at ~1.7 and each doubling of n costs exactly 4.0x - quadratic. 128 KB of input blocks the event loop for nearly half a minute to produce two results.

Mechanism

Instrumenting the rewrite branch confirms it runs exactly n + 1 times, once per literal }, each re-scanning the whole string.

There is a second multiplier. The rewrite replaces the group's closing } with the internal escClose sentinel, which is '\0CLOSE' + Math.random() + '\0' - about 25 characters. The working string therefore grows by ~25 characters on every pass:

n input length final string length
1,000 1,006 26,006
8,000 8,006 208,006

So the input is inflated roughly 26x, and that factor multiplies both the quadratic constant and peak memory. This makes it partly a memory-pressure issue as well as a CPU one.

Why max and maxLength do not help

The cost is in parsing, before the result set exists. The payload yields 2 results regardless of size, so neither bound is ever reached.

Impact

An application passing an untrusted pattern to expand(), directly or through minimatch / glob, can have its event loop blocked for tens of seconds by a payload well under minimatch's 65,536-character cap. For a single-threaded Node server that is a full stall, not just a slow request.

Degraded availability rather than a crash - the process recovers once the expansion completes.

Affected versions

Verified affected on 1.1.18, 2.1.4, 3.0.6 and 5.0.9, all within a few percent of each other (~460-490 ms at n=16,000).

Patch

The rewrite loop gets an iteration bound. Past the cap the remaining string is treated as non-expanding and returned literally, consistent with the existing max / maxLength caps, which truncate rather than throw.

Note this bounds the number of passes, not the cost of each: worst-case work remains proportional to cap x input length. The cap is set low enough that the residual is bounded in practice, and far above what any realistic {a},b} input needs.

Severity note

Scored 5.3 Medium (A:L) for consistency with GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp, the other algorithmic-complexity advisory on this package (CWE-407), which uses the same vector. The stack-exhaustion advisories on this package score A:H because they crash the process outright; this one stalls it.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "brace-expansion"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.0.12"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "brace-expansion"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.0.9"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "brace-expansion"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.1.7"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "brace-expansion"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.1.21"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-102277"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400",
      "CWE-407"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-29T23:45:39Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-28T21:17:16Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nExpanding `{a},b}`-shaped input takes time quadratic in the number of literal `}` characters, blocking the event loop.\n\nBash preserves a quirk where a brace group followed by a comma set still expands (`{a},b}`). The parser implements this by rewriting the string and restarting the scan. Each pass absorbs exactly one `}` and re-scans from the beginning, so `n` trailing braces cost `n` full passes.\n\n### Reproduction\n\n```js\nconst build = n =\u003e \u0027{a}\u0027 + \u0027}\u0027.repeat(n) + \u0027,z}\u0027\n\nfor (const n of [8000, 16000, 32000, 64000, 128000]) {\n  const t = Date.now()\n  expand(build(n))\n  console.log(n, Date.now() - t + \u0027ms\u0027)\n}\n```\n\n| n | input | time | results |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 8,000 | 8 KB | 110 ms | 2 |\n| 16,000 | 16 KB | 446 ms | 2 |\n| 32,000 | 32 KB | 1.7 s | 2 |\n| 64,000 | 64 KB | 6.9 s | 2 |\n| 128,000 | 128 KB | **27.7 s** | 2 |\n\n`ms/n^2` is flat at ~1.7 and each doubling of `n` costs exactly 4.0x - quadratic. 128 KB of input blocks the event loop for nearly half a minute to produce two results.\n\n### Mechanism\n\nInstrumenting the rewrite branch confirms it runs exactly `n + 1` times, once per literal `}`, each re-scanning the whole string.\n\nThere is a second multiplier. The rewrite replaces the group\u0027s closing `}` with the internal `escClose` sentinel, which is `\u0027\\0CLOSE\u0027 + Math.random() + \u0027\\0\u0027` - about 25 characters. The working string therefore *grows* by ~25 characters on every pass:\n\n| n | input length | final string length |\n|---|---|---|\n| 1,000 | 1,006 | 26,006 |\n| 8,000 | 8,006 | 208,006 |\n\nSo the input is inflated roughly 26x, and that factor multiplies both the quadratic constant and peak memory. This makes it partly a memory-pressure issue as well as a CPU one.\n\n### Why `max` and `maxLength` do not help\n\nThe cost is in parsing, before the result set exists. The payload yields 2 results regardless of size, so neither bound is ever reached.\n\n### Impact\n\nAn application passing an untrusted pattern to `expand()`, directly or through `minimatch` / `glob`, can have its event loop blocked for tens of seconds by a payload well under minimatch\u0027s 65,536-character cap. For a single-threaded Node server that is a full stall, not just a slow request.\n\nDegraded availability rather than a crash - the process recovers once the expansion completes.\n\n### Affected versions\n\nVerified affected on 1.1.18, 2.1.4, 3.0.6 and 5.0.9, all within a few percent of each other (~460-490 ms at n=16,000).\n\n### Patch\n\nThe rewrite loop gets an iteration bound. Past the cap the remaining string is treated as non-expanding and returned literally, consistent with the existing `max` / `maxLength` caps, which truncate rather than throw.\n\nNote this bounds the number of passes, not the cost of each: worst-case work remains proportional to `cap x input length`. The cap is set low enough that the residual is bounded in practice, and far above what any realistic `{a},b}` input needs.\n\n### Severity note\n\nScored 5.3 Medium (`A:L`) for consistency with GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp, the other algorithmic-complexity advisory on this package (CWE-407), which uses the same vector. The stack-exhaustion advisories on this package score `A:H` because they crash the process outright; this one stalls it.",
  "id": "GHSA-q2hr-2g5m-vwhr",
  "modified": "2026-09-29T23:45:39Z",
  "published": "2026-09-29T23:45:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/security/advisories/GHSA-q2hr-2g5m-vwhr"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-102277"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/33a5ef17b8d800bbfa8c52b14c39043b6aac1a96"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/bdff773f98e5988616b7039cc9b508df5d640b22"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/c55e67d8d8b1c56a2474afff15c2891166b2d364"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/ffdfa3e3806bed17c0874b8f1439b084de354a7e"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "brace-expansion: Quadratic-time expansion of the `{a},b}` rewrite causes CPU denial of service"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…