GHSA-HM3F-Q6RW-M6WH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-09 17:41 – Updated: 2026-03-09 17:41Impact
The PagesRouter static file serving route is vulnerable to a path traversal attack that allows unauthenticated reading of files outside the configured pagesPath directory. The boundary check uses a string prefix comparison without enforcing a directory separator boundary. An attacker can use path traversal sequences to access files in sibling directories whose names share the same prefix as the pages directory (e.g. pages-secret starts with pages).
This affects any Parse Server deployment with the pages feature enabled (pages.enableRouter: true). Exploitation requires a sibling directory of pagesPath whose name begins with the same string as the pages directory name.
Patches
The fix enforces a path separator boundary in the check, ensuring resolved paths must be strictly inside the pagesPath directory.
Workarounds
Ensure the pagesPath directory has no sibling directories whose names begin with the same prefix. For example, if pagesPath is /srv/pages, ensure no directory like /srv/pages-backup or /srv/pages_old exists alongside it.
References
- GitHub security advisory: https://github.com/parse-community/parse-server/security/advisories/GHSA-hm3f-q6rw-m6wh
- Fix for Parse Server 9: https://github.com/parse-community/parse-server/releases/tag/9.5.0-alpha.8
- Fix for Parse Server 8: https://github.com/parse-community/parse-server/releases/tag/8.6.8
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "parse-server"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "8.6.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "parse-server"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "9.0.0-alpha.1"
},
{
"fixed": "9.5.0-alpha.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-30848"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-22"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-09T17:41:55Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-07T17:15:52Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nThe `PagesRouter` static file serving route is vulnerable to a path traversal attack that allows unauthenticated reading of files outside the configured `pagesPath` directory. The boundary check uses a string prefix comparison without enforcing a directory separator boundary. An attacker can use path traversal sequences to access files in sibling directories whose names share the same prefix as the pages directory (e.g. `pages-secret` starts with `pages`).\n\nThis affects any Parse Server deployment with the `pages` feature enabled (`pages.enableRouter: true`). Exploitation requires a sibling directory of `pagesPath` whose name begins with the same string as the pages directory name.\n\n### Patches\n\nThe fix enforces a path separator boundary in the check, ensuring resolved paths must be strictly inside the `pagesPath` directory.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nEnsure the `pagesPath` directory has no sibling directories whose names begin with the same prefix. For example, if `pagesPath` is `/srv/pages`, ensure no directory like `/srv/pages-backup` or `/srv/pages_old` exists alongside it.\n\n### References\n\n- GitHub security advisory: https://github.com/parse-community/parse-server/security/advisories/GHSA-hm3f-q6rw-m6wh\n- Fix for Parse Server 9: https://github.com/parse-community/parse-server/releases/tag/9.5.0-alpha.8\n- Fix for Parse Server 8: https://github.com/parse-community/parse-server/releases/tag/8.6.8",
"id": "GHSA-hm3f-q6rw-m6wh",
"modified": "2026-03-09T17:41:55Z",
"published": "2026-03-09T17:41:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/parse-community/parse-server/security/advisories/GHSA-hm3f-q6rw-m6wh"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-30848"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/parse-community/parse-server"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Parse Server: `PagesRouter` path traversal allows reading files outside configured pages directory"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.