CVE-2026-71492 (GCVE-0-2026-71492)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-20 16:13 – Updated: 2026-08-20 17:11- CWE-22 - Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/masci/banks/security/advisorie… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/masci/banks/pull/77 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/masci/banks/commit/a215f6d7799… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/masci/banks/releases/tag/v2.4.5 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-71492",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-20T17:10:39.955134Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-20T17:11:10.125Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/masci/banks/security/advisories/GHSA-x8wg-4xgc-vr54"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "banks",
"vendor": "masci",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.4.5"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Banks generates meaningful LLM prompts using a simple template language. Prior to version 2.4.5, DirectoryPromptRegistry.set() in src/banks/registries/directory.py interpolates attacker-controlled Prompt.name and Prompt.version values into a Path without canonicalization or containment validation. Relative traversal such as ../victim/foo and an absolute Prompt.name can escape or discard the configured registry root, while overwrite=True permits replacement of existing target files. The poisoned name is persisted in index.json and reconstructed by _load(), allowing the out-of-root path to survive later registry loads. An application that forwards request data into these fields can therefore write Prompt.raw bytes to attacker-chosen paths writable by the application process. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.5."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-22",
"description": "CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-20T16:13:55.578Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/masci/banks/security/advisories/GHSA-x8wg-4xgc-vr54",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/masci/banks/security/advisories/GHSA-x8wg-4xgc-vr54"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/masci/banks/pull/77",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/masci/banks/pull/77"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/masci/banks/commit/a215f6d779966945c56e0af5abed1ae5916fd9d3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/masci/banks/commit/a215f6d779966945c56e0af5abed1ae5916fd9d3"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/masci/banks/releases/tag/v2.4.5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/masci/banks/releases/tag/v2.4.5"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-x8wg-4xgc-vr54",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Banks: Path traversal in `DirectoryPromptRegistry.set()` allows arbitrary file write outside the registry root"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-71492",
"datePublished": "2026-08-20T16:13:55.578Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-06T19:56:23.725Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-20T17:11:10.125Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-71492",
"date": "2026-11-14",
"epss": "0.00474",
"percentile": "0.41554"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "banks",
"vendor": "masci",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.4.5"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Banks generates meaningful LLM prompts using a simple template language. Prior to version 2.4.5, DirectoryPromptRegistry.set() in src/banks/registries/directory.py interpolates attacker-controlled Prompt.name and Prompt.version values into a Path without canonicalization or containment validation. Relative traversal such as ../victim/foo and an absolute Prompt.name can escape or discard the configured registry root, while overwrite=True permits replacement of existing target files. The poisoned name is persisted in index.json and reconstructed by _load(), allowing the out-of-root path to survive later registry loads. An application that forwards request data into these fields can therefore write Prompt.raw bytes to attacker-chosen paths writable by the application process. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.5."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Banks genera prompts de LLM significativos utilizando un lenguaje de plantilla simple. Antes de la versi\u00f3n 2.4.5, DirectoryPromptRegistry.set() en src/banks/registries/directory.py interpola valores de Prompt.name y Prompt.version controlados por el atacante en una ruta sin canonicalizaci\u00f3n ni validaci\u00f3n de contenci\u00f3n. La traversi\u00f3n relativa, como ../victim/foo, y un Prompt.name absoluto pueden escapar o descartar la ra\u00edz del registro configurada, mientras que overwrite=True permite el reemplazo de archivos de destino existentes. El nombre envenenado se persiste en index.json y es reconstruido por _load(), permitiendo que la ruta fuera de la ra\u00edz sobreviva a cargas posteriores del registro. Una aplicaci\u00f3n que reenv\u00eda datos de solicitud a estos campos puede, por lo tanto, escribir bytes de Prompt.raw en rutas elegidas por el atacante que sean escribibles por el proceso de la aplicaci\u00f3n. Este problema est\u00e1 solucionado en la versi\u00f3n 2.4.5."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-71492",
"lastModified": "2026-10-18T20:10:00.110",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 6.0,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-71492",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-20T17:10:39.955134Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-20T17:19:40.930",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/masci/banks/commit/a215f6d779966945c56e0af5abed1ae5916fd9d3"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/masci/banks/pull/77"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/masci/banks/releases/tag/v2.4.5"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/masci/banks/security/advisories/GHSA-x8wg-4xgc-vr54"
},
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"url": "https://github.com/masci/banks/security/advisories/GHSA-x8wg-4xgc-vr54"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-22"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-11-05T22:53:02+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-71492",
"id": "CVE-2026-71492",
"initial_release_date": "2026-08-20T16:13:55.578000+00:00",
"product_status:known_affected": "6",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "2",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "banks: Banks: Arbitrary file write via path traversal",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-71492.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-71492",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-20T17:10:39.955134Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-20T17:10:58.948Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/masci/banks/security/advisories/GHSA-x8wg-4xgc-vr54"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "banks",
"vendor": "masci",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.4.5"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Banks generates meaningful LLM prompts using a simple template language. Prior to version 2.4.5, DirectoryPromptRegistry.set() in src/banks/registries/directory.py interpolates attacker-controlled Prompt.name and Prompt.version values into a Path without canonicalization or containment validation. Relative traversal such as ../victim/foo and an absolute Prompt.name can escape or discard the configured registry root, while overwrite=True permits replacement of existing target files. The poisoned name is persisted in index.json and reconstructed by _load(), allowing the out-of-root path to survive later registry loads. An application that forwards request data into these fields can therefore write Prompt.raw bytes to attacker-chosen paths writable by the application process. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.5."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-22",
"description": "CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-20T16:13:55.578Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/masci/banks/security/advisories/GHSA-x8wg-4xgc-vr54",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/masci/banks/security/advisories/GHSA-x8wg-4xgc-vr54"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/masci/banks/pull/77",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/masci/banks/pull/77"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/masci/banks/commit/a215f6d779966945c56e0af5abed1ae5916fd9d3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/masci/banks/commit/a215f6d779966945c56e0af5abed1ae5916fd9d3"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/masci/banks/releases/tag/v2.4.5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/masci/banks/releases/tag/v2.4.5"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-x8wg-4xgc-vr54",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Banks: Path traversal in `DirectoryPromptRegistry.set()` allows arbitrary file write outside the registry root"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-71492",
"datePublished": "2026-08-20T16:13:55.578Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-06T19:56:23.725Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-20T17:11:10.125Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.