CVE-2026-65628 (GCVE-0-2026-65628)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-26 19:53 – Updated: 2026-10-26 19:53
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Infinite recursion (CPU denial-of-service) in JOSE.JWK.shared_secret/2 on mismatched key types
Summary
jose_jwk:shared_secret/2 (exposed in Elixir as JOSE.JWK.shared_secret/2) derives an ECDH shared secret from two JWKs. Its first function clause only matches when both JWKs carry the same key type (kty) module, and its fallback clause re-invokes itself as shared_secret(from(YourJWK), from(MyJWK)). Because from/1 returns an already-parsed jose_jwk record unchanged, passing two JWKs whose key types differ (for example an EC key and an RSA key) makes the fallback clause re-enter with identical arguments, producing an unbounded tail-recursive loop that never returns and never crashes.
An application that derives a shared secret from an externally supplied peer public key without first checking that the peer key's type and curve match its own key can be driven into this loop by an attacker-controlled JWK, pinning an Erlang scheduler at 100% CPU. Repeated requests exhaust the available schedulers, resulting in a denial of service.
This issue affects jose: from 1.5.0 before 1.11.13.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-674 - Uncontrolled Recursion
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/potatosalad/erlang-jose/securi… | vendor-advisoryrelated |
| https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-65628.html | related |
| https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-65628 | related |
| https://github.com/potatosalad/erlang-jose/commit… | related |
| https://github.com/potatosalad/erlang-jose/commit… | patch |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| potatosalad | jose |
Affected:
1.5.0 , < 1.11.13
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:potatosalad:jose:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
||
| potatosalad | jose |
Affected:
7b80b9f55b9898e1a6901ce136061b241b021d7c , < 26182a7de63b91550035d3f08741f7d17f1f675a
(git)
cpe:2.3:a:potatosalad:jose:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:potatosalad:jose:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"jose_jwk"
],
"packageName": "jose",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/jose",
"product": "jose",
"programFiles": [
"src/jwk/jose_jwk.erl"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "jose_jwk:shared_secret/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/potatosalad/erlang-jose",
"vendor": "potatosalad",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.11.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:potatosalad:jose:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"jose_jwk"
],
"packageName": "potatosalad/erlang-jose",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/potatosalad/erlang-jose",
"product": "jose",
"programFiles": [
"src/jwk/jose_jwk.erl"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "jose_jwk:shared_secret/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/potatosalad/erlang-jose",
"vendor": "potatosalad",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "26182a7de63b91550035d3f08741f7d17f1f675a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7b80b9f55b9898e1a6901ce136061b241b021d7c",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:potatosalad:jose:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.11.13",
"versionStartIncluding": "1.5.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Peter Ullrich"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Andrew Bennett"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "analyst",
"value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003e\u003ccode\u003ejose_jwk:shared_secret/2\u003c/code\u003e (exposed in Elixir as \u003ccode\u003eJOSE.JWK.shared_secret/2\u003c/code\u003e) derives an ECDH shared secret from two JWKs. Its first function clause only matches when both JWKs carry the same key type (\u003ccode\u003ekty\u003c/code\u003e) module, and its fallback clause re-invokes itself as \u003ccode\u003eshared_secret(from(YourJWK), from(MyJWK))\u003c/code\u003e. Because \u003ccode\u003efrom/1\u003c/code\u003e returns an already-parsed \u003ccode\u003ejose_jwk\u003c/code\u003e record unchanged, passing two JWKs whose key types differ (for example an EC key and an RSA key) makes the fallback clause re-enter with identical arguments, producing an unbounded tail-recursive loop that never returns and never crashes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAn application that derives a shared secret from an externally supplied peer public key without first checking that the peer key\u0027s type and curve match its own key can be driven into this loop by an attacker-controlled JWK, pinning an Erlang scheduler at 100% CPU. Repeated requests exhaust the available schedulers, resulting in a denial of service.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects jose: from 1.5.0 before 1.11.13.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "`jose_jwk:shared_secret/2` (exposed in Elixir as `JOSE.JWK.shared_secret/2`) derives an ECDH shared secret from two JWKs. Its first function clause only matches when both JWKs carry the same key type (`kty`) module, and its fallback clause re-invokes itself as `shared_secret(from(YourJWK), from(MyJWK))`. Because `from/1` returns an already-parsed `jose_jwk` record unchanged, passing two JWKs whose key types differ (for example an EC key and an RSA key) makes the fallback clause re-enter with identical arguments, producing an unbounded tail-recursive loop that never returns and never crashes.\n\nAn application that derives a shared secret from an externally supplied peer public key without first checking that the peer key\u0027s type and curve match its own key can be driven into this loop by an attacker-controlled JWK, pinning an Erlang scheduler at 100% CPU. Repeated requests exhaust the available schedulers, resulting in a denial of service.\n\nThis issue affects jose: from 1.5.0 before 1.11.13."
}
],
"value": "jose_jwk:shared_secret/2 (exposed in Elixir as JOSE.JWK.shared_secret/2) derives an ECDH shared secret from two JWKs. Its first function clause only matches when both JWKs carry the same key type (kty) module, and its fallback clause re-invokes itself as shared_secret(from(YourJWK), from(MyJWK)). Because from/1 returns an already-parsed jose_jwk record unchanged, passing two JWKs whose key types differ (for example an EC key and an RSA key) makes the fallback clause re-enter with identical arguments, producing an unbounded tail-recursive loop that never returns and never crashes.\n\nAn application that derives a shared secret from an externally supplied peer public key without first checking that the peer key\u0027s type and curve match its own key can be driven into this loop by an attacker-controlled JWK, pinning an Erlang scheduler at 100% CPU. Repeated requests exhaust the available schedulers, resulting in a denial of service.\n\nThis issue affects jose: from 1.5.0 before 1.11.13."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-130",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-130 Excessive Allocation"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-674",
"description": "CWE-674 Uncontrolled Recursion",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-26T19:53:27.625Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/potatosalad/erlang-jose/security/advisories/GHSA-fpj2-9h59-32pp"
},
{
"name": "EEF CNA record for CVE-2026-65628",
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-65628.html"
},
{
"name": "OSV record EEF-CVE-2026-65628",
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-65628"
},
{
"name": "Introducing commit 7b80b9f in potatosalad/erlang-jose",
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/potatosalad/erlang-jose/commit/7b80b9f55b9898e1a6901ce136061b241b021d7c"
},
{
"name": "Fix commit 26182a7 in potatosalad/erlang-jose",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/potatosalad/erlang-jose/commit/26182a7de63b91550035d3f08741f7d17f1f675a"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Infinite recursion (CPU denial-of-service) in JOSE.JWK.shared_secret/2 on mismatched key types",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eBefore calling \u003ccode\u003eJOSE.JWK.shared_secret/2\u003c/code\u003e, verify that the externally supplied peer key\u0027s type (\u003ccode\u003ekty\u003c/code\u003e) and curve match your own key, and reject any key whose type does not match before attempting derivation.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "Before calling `JOSE.JWK.shared_secret/2`, verify that the externally supplied peer key\u0027s type (`kty`) and curve match your own key, and reject any key whose type does not match before attempting derivation."
}
],
"value": "Before calling JOSE.JWK.shared_secret/2, verify that the externally supplied peer key\u0027s type (kty) and curve match your own key, and reject any key whose type does not match before attempting derivation."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-65628",
"datePublished": "2026-10-26T19:53:27.625Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-22T13:58:26.233Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-26T19:53:27.625Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-65628",
"date": "2026-10-27",
"epss": "0.00136",
"percentile": "0.03018"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:potatosalad:jose:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"jose_jwk"
],
"packageName": "jose",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/jose",
"product": "jose",
"programFiles": [
"src/jwk/jose_jwk.erl"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "jose_jwk:shared_secret/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/potatosalad/erlang-jose",
"vendor": "potatosalad",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.11.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:potatosalad:jose:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"jose_jwk"
],
"packageName": "potatosalad/erlang-jose",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/potatosalad/erlang-jose",
"product": "jose",
"programFiles": [
"src/jwk/jose_jwk.erl"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "jose_jwk:shared_secret/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/potatosalad/erlang-jose",
"vendor": "potatosalad",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "26182a7de63b91550035d3f08741f7d17f1f675a",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7b80b9f55b9898e1a6901ce136061b241b021d7c",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "jose_jwk:shared_secret/2 (exposed in Elixir as JOSE.JWK.shared_secret/2) derives an ECDH shared secret from two JWKs. Its first function clause only matches when both JWKs carry the same key type (kty) module, and its fallback clause re-invokes itself as shared_secret(from(YourJWK), from(MyJWK)). Because from/1 returns an already-parsed jose_jwk record unchanged, passing two JWKs whose key types differ (for example an EC key and an RSA key) makes the fallback clause re-enter with identical arguments, producing an unbounded tail-recursive loop that never returns and never crashes.\n\nAn application that derives a shared secret from an externally supplied peer public key without first checking that the peer key\u0027s type and curve match its own key can be driven into this loop by an attacker-controlled JWK, pinning an Erlang scheduler at 100% CPU. Repeated requests exhaust the available schedulers, resulting in a denial of service.\n\nThis issue affects jose: from 1.5.0 before 1.11.13."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-65628",
"lastModified": "2026-10-27T15:00:49.240",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-10-26T20:17:58.473",
"references": [
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-65628.html"
},
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://github.com/potatosalad/erlang-jose/commit/26182a7de63b91550035d3f08741f7d17f1f675a"
},
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://github.com/potatosalad/erlang-jose/commit/7b80b9f55b9898e1a6901ce136061b241b021d7c"
},
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://github.com/potatosalad/erlang-jose/security/advisories/GHSA-fpj2-9h59-32pp"
},
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-65628"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-674"
}
],
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.