CVE-2026-43926 (GCVE-0-2026-43926)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-04 12:46 – Updated: 2026-06-04 14:37
VLAI
Title
FOSSBilling's password reset confirmation endpoint lacks rate limiting
Summary
FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. Prior to version 0.8.0, the password reset confirmation endpoint `/client/reset-password-confirm/:hash` is handled by a non-API controller and is not covered by FOSSBilling's rate limiter, which only applies to `/api/*` routes. This allows an attacker to probe the endpoint for valid reset tokens without any per-IP request limiting, attempt counting, or lockout mechanism. The endpoint acts as an oracle, returning a distinguishable response for valid versus invalid tokens (HTTP 200 vs HTTP 302 redirect). An attacker can submit unlimited token guesses to the password reset confirmation endpoint with no throttling applied. However, practical exploitability is significantly mitigated by the current token generation, which uses `hash('sha256', random_bytes(32))`, providing 256 bits of entropy. Tokens also expire after 15 minutes and are deleted after successful use. The same architectural gap applies to other controller-served auth routes, including `/staff/email/:hash` (admin password reset confirmation) and `/client/confirm-email/:hash` (email confirmation). Version 0.8.0 fixes the issue. Some workarounds are available. Configure a reverse proxy (e.g., Nginx, Apache, Cloudflare) to apply per-IP rate limiting to the `/client/reset-password-confirm/*` and `/staff/email/*` paths and/or use a WAF rule to limit request rates to these endpoints.
Severity
6.3 (Medium)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-06-04 14:36 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-204 - Observable Response Discrepancy
  • CWE-307 - Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts
Assigner
GitHub_M CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard C 72/100 over 7836 records in the last 180 days details
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
FOSSBilling FOSSBilling Affected: < 0.8.0
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-43926",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-06-04T14:36:26.942114Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-06-04T14:37:01.297Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "FOSSBilling",
          "vendor": "FOSSBilling",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 0.8.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. Prior to version 0.8.0, the password reset confirmation endpoint `/client/reset-password-confirm/:hash` is handled by a non-API controller and is not covered by FOSSBilling\u0027s rate limiter, which only applies to `/api/*` routes. This allows an attacker to probe the endpoint for valid reset tokens without any per-IP request limiting, attempt counting, or lockout mechanism. The endpoint acts as an oracle, returning a distinguishable response for valid versus invalid tokens (HTTP 200 vs HTTP 302 redirect). An attacker can submit unlimited token guesses to the password reset confirmation endpoint with no throttling applied. However, practical exploitability is significantly mitigated by the current token generation, which uses `hash(\u0027sha256\u0027, random_bytes(32))`, providing 256 bits of entropy. Tokens also expire after 15 minutes and are deleted after successful use. The same architectural gap applies to other controller-served auth routes, including `/staff/email/:hash` (admin password reset confirmation) and `/client/confirm-email/:hash` (email confirmation). Version 0.8.0 fixes the issue. Some workarounds are available. Configure a reverse proxy (e.g., Nginx, Apache, Cloudflare) to apply per-IP rate limiting to the `/client/reset-password-confirm/*` and `/staff/email/*` paths and/or use a WAF rule to limit request rates to these endpoints."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-204",
              "description": "CWE-204: Observable Response Discrepancy",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-307",
              "description": "CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-06-04T12:46:30.909Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/security/advisories/GHSA-cqqm-p3x5-9fqg",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/security/advisories/GHSA-cqqm-p3x5-9fqg"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/releases/tag/0.8.0",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/releases/tag/0.8.0"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-cqqm-p3x5-9fqg",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "FOSSBilling\u0027s password reset confirmation endpoint lacks rate limiting"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-43926",
    "datePublished": "2026-06-04T12:46:30.909Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-04T16:59:09.089Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-06-04T14:37:01.297Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-43926",
      "date": "2026-11-09",
      "epss": "0.00217",
      "percentile": "0.12198"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "affected": [
          {
            "affectedData": [
              {
                "product": "FOSSBilling",
                "vendor": "FOSSBilling",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "\u003c 0.8.0"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ],
            "source": "security-advisories@github.com"
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. Prior to version 0.8.0, the password reset confirmation endpoint `/client/reset-password-confirm/:hash` is handled by a non-API controller and is not covered by FOSSBilling\u0027s rate limiter, which only applies to `/api/*` routes. This allows an attacker to probe the endpoint for valid reset tokens without any per-IP request limiting, attempt counting, or lockout mechanism. The endpoint acts as an oracle, returning a distinguishable response for valid versus invalid tokens (HTTP 200 vs HTTP 302 redirect). An attacker can submit unlimited token guesses to the password reset confirmation endpoint with no throttling applied. However, practical exploitability is significantly mitigated by the current token generation, which uses `hash(\u0027sha256\u0027, random_bytes(32))`, providing 256 bits of entropy. Tokens also expire after 15 minutes and are deleted after successful use. The same architectural gap applies to other controller-served auth routes, including `/staff/email/:hash` (admin password reset confirmation) and `/client/confirm-email/:hash` (email confirmation). Version 0.8.0 fixes the issue. Some workarounds are available. Configure a reverse proxy (e.g., Nginx, Apache, Cloudflare) to apply per-IP rate limiting to the `/client/reset-password-confirm/*` and `/staff/email/*` paths and/or use a WAF rule to limit request rates to these endpoints."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "FOSSBilling es un sistema de gesti\u00f3n de facturaci\u00f3n y de clientes gratuito y de c\u00f3digo abierto. Antes de la versi\u00f3n 0.8.0, el endpoint de confirmaci\u00f3n de restablecimiento de contrase\u00f1a \u0027/client/reset-password-confirm/:hash\u0027 es gestionado por un controlador que no es una API y no est\u00e1 cubierto por el limitador de velocidad de FOSSBilling, que solo se aplica a las rutas \u0027/api/ \u0027. Esto permite a un atacante sondear el endpoint en busca de tokens de restablecimiento v\u00e1lidos sin ninguna limitaci\u00f3n de solicitudes por IP, conteo de intentos o mecanismo de bloqueo. El endpoint act\u00faa como un or\u00e1culo, devolviendo una respuesta distinguible para tokens v\u00e1lidos frente a inv\u00e1lidos (HTTP 200 vs redirecci\u00f3n HTTP 302). Un atacante puede enviar un n\u00famero ilimitado de intentos de tokens al endpoint de confirmaci\u00f3n de restablecimiento de contrase\u00f1a sin que se aplique ninguna limitaci\u00f3n. Sin embargo, la explotabilidad pr\u00e1ctica se mitiga significativamente por la generaci\u00f3n actual de tokens, que utiliza \u0027hash( sha256 , random_bytes(32))\u0027, proporcionando 256 bits de entrop\u00eda. Los tokens tambi\u00e9n caducan despu\u00e9s de 15 minutos y se eliminan despu\u00e9s de un uso exitoso. La misma brecha arquitect\u00f3nica se aplica a otras rutas de autenticaci\u00f3n servidas por el controlador, incluyendo \u0027/staff/email/:hash\u0027 (confirmaci\u00f3n de restablecimiento de contrase\u00f1a de administrador) y \u0027/client/confirm-email/:hash\u0027 (confirmaci\u00f3n de correo electr\u00f3nico). La versi\u00f3n 0.8.0 soluciona el problema. Hay algunas soluciones alternativas disponibles. Configure un proxy inverso (por ejemplo, Nginx, Apache, Cloudflare) para aplicar la limitaci\u00f3n de velocidad por IP a las rutas \u0027/client/reset-password-confirm/ \u0027 y \u0027/staff/email/ \u0027 y/o utilice una regla de WAF para limitar las tasas de solicitud a estos endpoints."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2026-43926",
        "lastModified": "2026-07-22T20:10:00.127",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV40": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
                "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "baseScore": 6.3,
                "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
                "confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
                "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
                "version": "4.0",
                "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
                "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
                "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
              },
              "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
              "type": "Secondary"
            }
          ],
          "ssvcV203": [
            {
              "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "ssvcData": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-43926",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "technicalImpact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-06-04T14:36:26.942114Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              }
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2026-06-04T14:16:41.193",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
            "url": "https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/releases/tag/0.8.0"
          },
          {
            "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
            "url": "https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/security/advisories/GHSA-cqqm-p3x5-9fqg"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-204"
              },
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-307"
              }
            ],
            "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
            "type": "Secondary"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "redhat_vex": {
      "current_release_date": "2026-06-05T19:40:03+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-43926",
      "id": "CVE-2026-43926",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "FOSSBilling\u0027s password reset confirmation endpoint lacks rate limiting",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-43926.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": {
        "adp": [
          {
            "metrics": [
              {
                "other": {
                  "content": {
                    "id": "CVE-2026-43926",
                    "options": [
                      {
                        "Exploitation": "none"
                      },
                      {
                        "Automatable": "no"
                      },
                      {
                        "Technical Impact": "partial"
                      }
                    ],
                    "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                    "timestamp": "2026-06-04T14:36:26.942114Z",
                    "version": "2.0.3"
                  },
                  "type": "ssvc"
                }
              }
            ],
            "providerMetadata": {
              "dateUpdated": "2026-06-04T14:36:56.505Z",
              "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
            },
            "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
          }
        ],
        "cna": {
          "affected": [
            {
              "product": "FOSSBilling",
              "vendor": "FOSSBilling",
              "versions": [
                {
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "\u003c 0.8.0"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. Prior to version 0.8.0, the password reset confirmation endpoint `/client/reset-password-confirm/:hash` is handled by a non-API controller and is not covered by FOSSBilling\u0027s rate limiter, which only applies to `/api/*` routes. This allows an attacker to probe the endpoint for valid reset tokens without any per-IP request limiting, attempt counting, or lockout mechanism. The endpoint acts as an oracle, returning a distinguishable response for valid versus invalid tokens (HTTP 200 vs HTTP 302 redirect). An attacker can submit unlimited token guesses to the password reset confirmation endpoint with no throttling applied. However, practical exploitability is significantly mitigated by the current token generation, which uses `hash(\u0027sha256\u0027, random_bytes(32))`, providing 256 bits of entropy. Tokens also expire after 15 minutes and are deleted after successful use. The same architectural gap applies to other controller-served auth routes, including `/staff/email/:hash` (admin password reset confirmation) and `/client/confirm-email/:hash` (email confirmation). Version 0.8.0 fixes the issue. Some workarounds are available. Configure a reverse proxy (e.g., Nginx, Apache, Cloudflare) to apply per-IP rate limiting to the `/client/reset-password-confirm/*` and `/staff/email/*` paths and/or use a WAF rule to limit request rates to these endpoints."
            }
          ],
          "metrics": [
            {
              "cvssV4_0": {
                "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
                "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "baseScore": 6.3,
                "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
                "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
                "version": "4.0",
                "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
                "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
              }
            }
          ],
          "problemTypes": [
            {
              "descriptions": [
                {
                  "cweId": "CWE-204",
                  "description": "CWE-204: Observable Response Discrepancy",
                  "lang": "en",
                  "type": "CWE"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "descriptions": [
                {
                  "cweId": "CWE-307",
                  "description": "CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts",
                  "lang": "en",
                  "type": "CWE"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "providerMetadata": {
            "dateUpdated": "2026-06-04T12:46:30.909Z",
            "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
            "shortName": "GitHub_M"
          },
          "references": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/security/advisories/GHSA-cqqm-p3x5-9fqg",
              "tags": [
                "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/security/advisories/GHSA-cqqm-p3x5-9fqg"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/releases/tag/0.8.0",
              "tags": [
                "x_refsource_MISC"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/FOSSBilling/FOSSBilling/releases/tag/0.8.0"
            }
          ],
          "source": {
            "advisory": "GHSA-cqqm-p3x5-9fqg",
            "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
          },
          "title": "FOSSBilling\u0027s password reset confirmation endpoint lacks rate limiting"
        }
      },
      "cveMetadata": {
        "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
        "cveId": "CVE-2026-43926",
        "datePublished": "2026-06-04T12:46:30.909Z",
        "dateReserved": "2026-05-04T16:59:09.089Z",
        "dateUpdated": "2026-06-04T14:37:01.297Z",
        "state": "PUBLISHED"
      },
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.