Search criteria
ⓘ
Use full-text search for keyword queries.
Combine vendor, product, and sources to narrow results.
Enable “Apply ordering” to sort by dates instead of relevance.
Related vulnerabilities
GHSA-3F24-PCVM-5JQC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-24 21:51 – Updated: 2026-03-24 21:51Background
NATS.io is a high performance open source pub-sub distributed communication technology, built for the cloud, on-premise, IoT, and edge computing.
One authentication model supported is mTLS, deriving the NATS client identity from properties of the TLS Client Certificate.
Problem Description
When using mTLS for client identity, with verify_and_map to derive a NATS identity from the client certificate's Subject DN, certain patterns of RDN would not be correctly enforced, allowing for authentication bypass.
This does require a valid certificate from a CA already trusted for client certificates, and DN naming patterns which the NATS maintainers consider highly unlikely.
So this is an unlikely attack. Nonetheless, administrators who have been very sophisticated in their DN construction patterns might conceivably be impacted.
Affected Versions
Fixed in nats-server 2.12.6 & 2.11.15
Workarounds
Developers should review their CA issuing practices.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.11.15"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.12.0-RC.1"
},
{
"fixed": "2.12.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33248"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-287",
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-24T21:51:08Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Background\n\nNATS.io is a high performance open source pub-sub distributed communication technology, built for the cloud, on-premise, IoT, and edge computing.\n\nOne authentication model supported is mTLS, deriving the NATS client identity from properties of the TLS Client Certificate.\n\n### Problem Description\n\nWhen using mTLS for client identity, with `verify_and_map` to derive a NATS identity from the client certificate\u0027s Subject DN, certain patterns of RDN would not be correctly enforced, allowing for authentication bypass.\n\nThis does require a valid certificate from a CA already trusted for client certificates, and `DN` naming patterns which the NATS maintainers consider highly unlikely.\n\nSo this is an unlikely attack. Nonetheless, administrators who have been very sophisticated in their `DN` construction patterns might conceivably be impacted.\n\n### Affected Versions\n\nFixed in nats-server 2.12.6 \u0026 2.11.15\n\n### Workarounds\n\nDevelopers should review their CA issuing practices.",
"id": "GHSA-3f24-pcvm-5jqc",
"modified": "2026-03-24T21:51:08Z",
"published": "2026-03-24T21:51:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nats-io/nats-server/security/advisories/GHSA-3f24-pcvm-5jqc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://advisories.nats.io/CVE/secnote-2026-13.txt"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/nats-io/nats-server"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "NATS has mTLS verify_and_map authentication bypass via incorrect Subject DN matching"
}