CVE-2026-119078 (GCVE-0-2026-119078)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-09 20:11 – Updated: 2026-11-10 00:11| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ol71kdgopfxw… | vendor-advisory |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/1… |
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Commons Codec |
Affected:
1.16.0 , < 1.23.0
(maven)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-10T00:11:04.919Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/11/09/29"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "commons-codec:commons-codec",
"packageURL": "pkg:maven/commons-codec/commons-codec",
"product": "Apache Commons Codec",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.23.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.16.0",
"versionType": "maven"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "tool",
"value": "Claude Security"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Gary D. Gregory"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eApache Commons Codec\u0027s \u003c/span\u003e\u003ccode\u003eBlake3\u003c/code\u003e\u003cspan\u003e class documented the output of its \u003c/span\u003e\u003ccode\u003edoFinalize\u003c/code\u003e\u003cspan\u003e methods as depending on any previously finalized bytes, so that consecutive calls would return different output. In fact, \u003c/span\u003e\u003ccode\u003edoFinalize\u003c/code\u003e\u003cspan\u003e does not change the hash state: calling it again without supplying more input returns the same bytes. The key-derivation example in the class Javadoc, shipped since 1.16.0, derives two keys with two consecutive \u003c/span\u003e\u003ccode\u003edoFinalize\u003c/code\u003e\u003cspan\u003e calls. Code that follows it gets identical keys, so the separation between the derived keys is lost. The same applies to any application that calls \u003c/span\u003e\u003ccode\u003edoFinalize\u003c/code\u003e\u003cspan\u003e more than once on one instance and expects new output each time.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Apache Commons Codec from 1.16.0 before 1.23.0.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eVersion 1.23.0 corrects the documentation, but the behavior of \u003ccode\u003edoFinalize\u003c/code\u003e is unchanged. Upgrading alone does not fix affected code. Users should check their applications for repeated \u003ccode\u003edoFinalize\u003c/code\u003e calls on the same Blake3 instance and derive multiple keys by requesting the combined length in one call and splitting the output, as the updated Javadoc shows.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Apache Commons Codec\u0027s Blake3 class documented the output of its doFinalize methods as depending on any previously finalized bytes, so that consecutive calls would return different output. In fact, doFinalize does not change the hash state: calling it again without supplying more input returns the same bytes. The key-derivation example in the class Javadoc, shipped since 1.16.0, derives two keys with two consecutive doFinalize calls. Code that follows it gets identical keys, so the separation between the derived keys is lost. The same applies to any application that calls doFinalize more than once on one instance and expects new output each time.\n\n\n\nThis issue affects Apache Commons Codec from 1.16.0 before 1.23.0.\n\n\n\nVersion 1.23.0 corrects the documentation, but the behavior of doFinalize is unchanged. Upgrading alone does not fix affected code. Users should check their applications for repeated doFinalize calls on the same Blake3 instance and derive multiple keys by requesting the combined length in one call and splitting the output, as the updated Javadoc shows."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "important"
},
"type": "Textual description of severity"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-684",
"description": "CWE-684 Incorrect Provision of Specified Functionality",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1068",
"description": "CWE-1068 Inconsistency Between Implementation and Documented Design",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-09T20:11:12.230Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ol71kdgopfxwlxgqmkd0jrfcw05wdq5z"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Apache Commons Codec: Blake3 doFinalize is stateless; the documented KDF example derives identical keys",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.3"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-119078",
"datePublished": "2026-11-09T20:11:12.230Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-29T13:10:03.787Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-10T00:11:04.919Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-119078",
"date": "2026-11-10",
"epss": "0.00229",
"percentile": "0.13837"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "commons-codec:commons-codec",
"packageURL": "pkg:maven/commons-codec/commons-codec",
"product": "Apache Commons Codec",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.23.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.16.0",
"versionType": "maven"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Apache Commons Codec\u0027s Blake3 class documented the output of its doFinalize methods as depending on any previously finalized bytes, so that consecutive calls would return different output. In fact, doFinalize does not change the hash state: calling it again without supplying more input returns the same bytes. The key-derivation example in the class Javadoc, shipped since 1.16.0, derives two keys with two consecutive doFinalize calls. Code that follows it gets identical keys, so the separation between the derived keys is lost. The same applies to any application that calls doFinalize more than once on one instance and expects new output each time.\n\n\n\nThis issue affects Apache Commons Codec from 1.16.0 before 1.23.0.\n\n\n\nVersion 1.23.0 corrects the documentation, but the behavior of doFinalize is unchanged. Upgrading alone does not fix affected code. Users should check their applications for repeated doFinalize calls on the same Blake3 instance and derive multiple keys by requesting the combined length in one call and splitting the output, as the updated Javadoc shows."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-119078",
"lastModified": "2026-11-10T01:17:15.863",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-11-09T20:18:04.697",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ol71kdgopfxwlxgqmkd0jrfcw05wdq5z"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/11/09/29"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
"vulnStatus": "Received",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-684"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-1068"
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.