CVE-2026-114489 (GCVE-0-2026-114489)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-21 15:34 – Updated: 2026-10-21 15:34
VLAI
Title
Missing Authorization in hMailServer
Summary
Missing authorization in the REST and COM administration APIs of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credential is confined to named domains to change mail routing and domain configuration beyond those domains on a multi-tenant server. A domain administrator, an account or API key given another role that manages accounts in named domains, or a full-scope API key issued for named domains could create a domain alias for any name (so that other tenants' mail for that name is diverted to an address the attacker controls, or denied), rename a domain to any name the server does not host, set a rule's bind-to-address, send-using-route or script-function action to reach one of the server's own addresses, a configured route's stored credentials or a function of the server's event script, and set the domain's relay host - which delivery then connects to with no address rule - to an address on the server's own network; and over the COM API any account could set the three rule actions on its own rules, where the script-function action runs at delivery. The authorization gate did not refuse these routes to a confined credential and the handlers were not given the caller; over COM the domain-alias save performed no authorization check at all, the domain rename required only a domain administrator, and a rule save required at most that the caller could change the rule's owner.
Severity
8.1 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CWE
Assigner
GitLab CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard C 74/100 over 327 records in the last 180 days details
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
Progressive Robot Ltd hMailServer Affected: 6.0.0 , ≤ 6.3.6 (semver)
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Credits
Found in the hMailServer project's own security review (Progressive Robot Ltd)
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "hMailServer",
          "repo": "https://gitlab.com/hmailserver/hmailserver",
          "vendor": "Progressive Robot Ltd",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "6.3.6",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Found in the hMailServer project\u0027s own security review (Progressive Robot Ltd)"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Missing authorization in the REST and COM administration APIs of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credential is confined to named domains to change mail routing and domain configuration beyond those domains on a multi-tenant server. A domain administrator, an account or API key given another role that manages accounts in named domains, or a full-scope API key issued for named domains could create a domain alias for any name (so that other tenants\u0027 mail for that name is diverted to an address the attacker controls, or denied), rename a domain to any name the server does not host, set a rule\u0027s bind-to-address, send-using-route or script-function action to reach one of the server\u0027s own addresses, a configured route\u0027s stored credentials or a function of the server\u0027s event script, and set the domain\u0027s relay host - which delivery then connects to with no address rule - to an address on the server\u0027s own network; and over the COM API any account could set the three rule actions on its own rules, where the script-function action runs at delivery. The authorization gate did not refuse these routes to a confined credential and the handlers were not given the caller; over COM the domain-alias save performed no authorization check at all, the domain rename required only a domain administrator, and a rule save required at most that the caller could change the rule\u0027s owner."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 8.1,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-862",
              "description": "CWE-862: Missing Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-10-21T15:34:06.371Z",
        "orgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
        "shortName": "GitLab"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://gitlab.com/hmailserver/hmailserver/-/work_items/86"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://gitlab.com/hmailserver/hmailserver/-/releases/v6.3.7"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Upgrade to hMailServer 6.3.7, which refuses the domain-alias create, the domain rename and an internal relay host to a credential that is confined to named domains, and the reaching rule actions (bind-to-address, send-using-route, script-function on an owned rule) to anyone but the server administrator, over both the REST and the COM APIs, while keeping the changes that stay inside the credential\u0027s domains. Until then, on a multi-tenant server, do not give a domain-administrator credential, a role that manages accounts in named domains, or a named-domain API key to a party not trusted with the whole server; keep the REST API off (RestApiPort=0, the default) where it is not needed; and review existing domain aliases, domain names, relay hosts and account/domain rule actions for entries a confined credential should not have made, and the accounts\u0027 own rules for these three actions, which withholding such credentials does not stop an account setting on its own rules over COM (do this after upgrading as well, since an upgrade does not undo a change already made)."
        }
      ],
      "title": "Missing Authorization in hMailServer"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
    "assignerShortName": "GitLab",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-114489",
    "datePublished": "2026-10-21T15:34:06.371Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-10-21T15:33:56.489Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-10-21T15:34:06.371Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.