CVE-2025-22273 (GCVE-0-2025-22273)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-02-28 12:33 – Updated: 2025-03-05 15:53 Exclusively Hosted Service
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Lack of rate-limiting in password change mechanism in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Summary
Application does not limit the number or frequency of user interactions, such as the number of incoming requests. At the "/EPMUI/VfManager.asmx/ChangePassword" endpoint it is possible to perform a brute force attack on the current password in use.
This issue affects CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in SaaS version 24.7.1. The status of other versions is unknown. After multiple attempts to contact the vendor we did not receive any answer.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-02-28 13:02 UTC
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://cert.pl/en/posts/2025/02/CVE-2025-22270/ | third-party-advisory |
| https://cert.pl/posts/2025/02/CVE-2025-22270/ | third-party-advisory |
| https://docs.cyberark.com/epm/24.7.1/en/content/r… | product |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CyberArk | Endpoint Privilege Manager |
Affected:
24.7.1
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-22273",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-02-28T13:02:35.188402Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-28T13:02:49.968Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"platforms": [
"SaaS"
],
"product": "Endpoint Privilege Manager",
"vendor": "CyberArk",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "24.7.1"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Karol Mazurek (Afine Team)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Maksymilian Kubiak (Afine Team)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eApplication does not limit the number or frequency of user interactions, such as the number of incoming requests. At the \"/EPMUI/VfManager.asmx/ChangePassword\" endpoint it is possible to perform a brute force attack on the current password in use.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects\u0026nbsp;CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in SaaS version 24.7.1. The status of other versions is unknown.\u0026nbsp;After multiple attempts to contact the vendor we did not receive any answer.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Application does not limit the number or frequency of user interactions, such as the number of incoming requests. At the \"/EPMUI/VfManager.asmx/ChangePassword\" endpoint it is possible to perform a brute force attack on the current password in use.\n\n\nThis issue affects\u00a0CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in SaaS version 24.7.1. The status of other versions is unknown.\u00a0After multiple attempts to contact the vendor we did not receive any answer."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-49",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-49 Password Brute Forcing"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-05T15:53:23.083Z",
"orgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"shortName": "CERT-PL"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://cert.pl/en/posts/2025/02/CVE-2025-22270/"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://cert.pl/posts/2025/02/CVE-2025-22270/"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://docs.cyberark.com/epm/24.7.1/en/content/resources/_topnav/cc_home.htm"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"tags": [
"exclusively-hosted-service"
],
"title": "Lack of rate-limiting in password change mechanism in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"assignerShortName": "CERT-PL",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-22273",
"datePublished": "2025-02-28T12:33:41.107Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-01-02T13:12:19.642Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-05T15:53:23.083Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-22273",
"date": "2026-11-12",
"epss": "0.00617",
"percentile": "0.50066"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"platforms": [
"SaaS"
],
"product": "Endpoint Privilege Manager",
"vendor": "CyberArk",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "24.7.1"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cvd@cert.pl"
}
],
"cveTags": [
{
"sourceIdentifier": "cvd@cert.pl",
"tags": [
"exclusively-hosted-service"
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Application does not limit the number or frequency of user interactions, such as the number of incoming requests. At the \"/EPMUI/VfManager.asmx/ChangePassword\" endpoint it is possible to perform a brute force attack on the current password in use.\n\n\nThis issue affects\u00a0CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in SaaS version 24.7.1. The status of other versions is unknown.\u00a0After multiple attempts to contact the vendor we did not receive any answer."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "La aplicaci\u00f3n no limita la cantidad ni la frecuencia de las interacciones del usuario, como la cantidad de solicitudes entrantes. En el endpoint \"/EPMUI/VfManager.asmx/ChangePassword\" es posible realizar un ataque de fuerza bruta sobre la contrase\u00f1a actual en uso. Este problema afecta a CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager en la versi\u00f3n SaaS 24.7.1. Se desconoce el estado de otras versiones. Despu\u00e9s de varios intentos de comunicarnos con el proveedor, no recibimos ninguna respuesta."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-22273",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T08:46:04.063",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "cvd@cert.pl",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-22273",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-02-28T13:02:35.188402Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-02-28T13:15:27.927",
"references": [
{
"source": "cvd@cert.pl",
"url": "https://cert.pl/en/posts/2025/02/CVE-2025-22270/"
},
{
"source": "cvd@cert.pl",
"url": "https://cert.pl/posts/2025/02/CVE-2025-22270/"
},
{
"source": "cvd@cert.pl",
"url": "https://docs.cyberark.com/epm/24.7.1/en/content/resources/_topnav/cc_home.htm"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cvd@cert.pl",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-770"
}
],
"source": "cvd@cert.pl",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2025-05-28T17:27:15+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-22273",
"id": "CVE-2025-22273",
"initial_release_date": "2025-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Lack of rate-limiting in password change mechanism in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-22273.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-22273",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-02-28T13:02:35.188402Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-28T13:02:45.419Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"platforms": [
"SaaS"
],
"product": "Endpoint Privilege Manager",
"vendor": "CyberArk",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "24.7.1"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Karol Mazurek (Afine Team)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Maksymilian Kubiak (Afine Team)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eApplication does not limit the number or frequency of user interactions, such as the number of incoming requests. At the \"/EPMUI/VfManager.asmx/ChangePassword\" endpoint it is possible to perform a brute force attack on the current password in use.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects\u0026nbsp;CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in SaaS version 24.7.1. The status of other versions is unknown.\u0026nbsp;After multiple attempts to contact the vendor we did not receive any answer.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Application does not limit the number or frequency of user interactions, such as the number of incoming requests. At the \"/EPMUI/VfManager.asmx/ChangePassword\" endpoint it is possible to perform a brute force attack on the current password in use.\n\n\nThis issue affects\u00a0CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager in SaaS version 24.7.1. The status of other versions is unknown.\u00a0After multiple attempts to contact the vendor we did not receive any answer."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-49",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-49 Password Brute Forcing"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-05T15:53:23.083Z",
"orgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"shortName": "CERT-PL"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://cert.pl/en/posts/2025/02/CVE-2025-22270/"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://cert.pl/posts/2025/02/CVE-2025-22270/"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://docs.cyberark.com/epm/24.7.1/en/content/resources/_topnav/cc_home.htm"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"tags": [
"exclusively-hosted-service"
],
"title": "Lack of rate-limiting in password change mechanism in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"assignerShortName": "CERT-PL",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-22273",
"datePublished": "2025-02-28T12:33:41.107Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-01-02T13:12:19.642Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-05T15:53:23.083Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.