Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2025-22125 (GCVE-0-2025-22125)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-04-16 14:13 – Updated: 2026-05-11 21:13| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
5404bc7a87b9949cf61e0174b21f80e73239ab25 , < 10f4ff4baeb6951cf58282954318827b6852d501
(git)
Affected: 5404bc7a87b9949cf61e0174b21f80e73239ab25 , < 73506e581c0b1814cdfd2229d589f30751d7de26 (git) Affected: 5404bc7a87b9949cf61e0174b21f80e73239ab25 , < 8a0adf3d778c4a0893c6d34a9e1b0082a6f1c495 (git) Affected: 5404bc7a87b9949cf61e0174b21f80e73239ab25 , < e879a0d9cb086c8e52ce6c04e5bfa63825a6213c (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
2.6.19
Unaffected: 0 , < 2.6.19 (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.136 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.12.46 , ≤ 6.12.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.14.2 , ≤ 6.14.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.15 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/md/raid1.c",
"drivers/md/raid10.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10f4ff4baeb6951cf58282954318827b6852d501",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5404bc7a87b9949cf61e0174b21f80e73239ab25",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "73506e581c0b1814cdfd2229d589f30751d7de26",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5404bc7a87b9949cf61e0174b21f80e73239ab25",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8a0adf3d778c4a0893c6d34a9e1b0082a6f1c495",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5404bc7a87b9949cf61e0174b21f80e73239ab25",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e879a0d9cb086c8e52ce6c04e5bfa63825a6213c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5404bc7a87b9949cf61e0174b21f80e73239ab25",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/md/raid1.c",
"drivers/md/raid10.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.19"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.19",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.136",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.46",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.14.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.14.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.15",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.136",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.19",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.46",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.19",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.14.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.19",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.15",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.19",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmd/raid1,raid10: don\u0027t ignore IO flags\n\nIf blk-wbt is enabled by default, it\u0027s found that raid write performance\nis quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks,\ndue to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist since\nblk-wbt is introduced.\n\nOther than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, for\nexample REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priority\nreverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, because\nio will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.\n\nFix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.\n\nFises: f51d46d0e7cb (\"md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT\")"
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T21:13:27.100Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10f4ff4baeb6951cf58282954318827b6852d501"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/73506e581c0b1814cdfd2229d589f30751d7de26"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8a0adf3d778c4a0893c6d34a9e1b0082a6f1c495"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e879a0d9cb086c8e52ce6c04e5bfa63825a6213c"
}
],
"title": "md/raid1,raid10: don\u0027t ignore IO flags",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-22125",
"datePublished": "2025-04-16T14:13:08.779Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-12-29T08:45:45.823Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T21:13:27.100Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-22125",
"date": "2026-10-01",
"epss": "0.00189",
"percentile": "0.0772"
},
"microsoft_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-09-13T01:50:19.000Z",
"cve": "CVE-2025-22125",
"id": "msrc_CVE-2025-22125",
"initial_release_date": "2025-09-03T21:54:28.000Z",
"product_status:fixed": "1",
"product_status:known_affected": "15",
"source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "md/raid1,raid10: don\u0027t ignore IO flags",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2025/msrc_cve-2025-22125.json",
"version": "13"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/md/raid1.c",
"drivers/md/raid10.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10f4ff4baeb6951cf58282954318827b6852d501",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5404bc7a87b9949cf61e0174b21f80e73239ab25",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "73506e581c0b1814cdfd2229d589f30751d7de26",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5404bc7a87b9949cf61e0174b21f80e73239ab25",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8a0adf3d778c4a0893c6d34a9e1b0082a6f1c495",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5404bc7a87b9949cf61e0174b21f80e73239ab25",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e879a0d9cb086c8e52ce6c04e5bfa63825a6213c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5404bc7a87b9949cf61e0174b21f80e73239ab25",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/md/raid1.c",
"drivers/md/raid10.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.19"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.19",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.136",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.46",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.14.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.14.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.15",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FE5F2FD2-E9C2-4521-AED1-C65EBA5BF5D0",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.46",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.19",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "633A38C1-75C8-452D-8F1C-DA0269FD2687",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.14.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.13",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmd/raid1,raid10: don\u0027t ignore IO flags\n\nIf blk-wbt is enabled by default, it\u0027s found that raid write performance\nis quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks,\ndue to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist since\nblk-wbt is introduced.\n\nOther than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, for\nexample REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priority\nreverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, because\nio will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.\n\nFix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.\n\nFises: f51d46d0e7cb (\"md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT\")"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: md/raid1,raid10: no ignorar los indicadores de E/S. Si blk-wbt est\u00e1 habilitado por defecto, el rendimiento de escritura en RAID es bastante bajo, ya que todas las E/S son limitadas por wbt de los discos subyacentes, debido a que se ignora el indicador REQ_IDLE. Resulta que este comportamiento existe desde la introducci\u00f3n de blk-wbt. Adem\u00e1s de REQ_IDLE, tampoco se deben ignorar otros indicadores; por ejemplo, se puede configurar REQ_META para sistemas de archivos; borrarlo puede causar problemas de inversi\u00f3n de prioridad. REQ_NOWAIT tampoco se debe borrar, ya que la E/S esperar\u00e1 en lugar de fallar directamente en los discos subyacentes. Para solucionar estos problemas, mantenga los indicadores de E/S de la bios maestra. Fises: f51d46d0e7cb (\"md: a\u00f1adir soporte para REQ_NOWAIT\")"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-22125",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T08:45:12.100",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-04-16T15:16:06.630",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10f4ff4baeb6951cf58282954318827b6852d501"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/73506e581c0b1814cdfd2229d589f30751d7de26"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8a0adf3d778c4a0893c6d34a9e1b0082a6f1c495"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e879a0d9cb086c8e52ce6c04e5bfa63825a6213c"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-06-30T00:48:20+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-22125",
"id": "CVE-2025-22125",
"initial_release_date": "2025-04-16T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_affected": "198",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "76",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: md/raid1,raid10: don\u0027t ignore IO flags",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-22125.json",
"version": "3"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-03-27 - Updated: 2026-03-27
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, une élévation de privilèges et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 16.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 25.10",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 14.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-29111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-29111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68348",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68348"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68361",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68361"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68326",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68326"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-03-27T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-03-27T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-0371",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-03-27T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-03-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8098-9",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8098-9"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8119-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8119-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8098-6",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8098-6"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8126-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8126-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8098-7",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8098-7"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8112-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8112-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8098-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8098-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8112-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8112-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8116-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8116-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8112-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8112-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8059-9",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8059-9"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8098-5",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8098-5"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8094-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8094-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8119-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8119-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8095-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8095-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8121-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8121-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-20",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8112-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8112-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8098-8",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8098-8"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8112-5",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8112-5"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8125-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8125-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8096-5",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8096-5"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8094-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8094-4"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-04-03 - Updated: 2026-04-03
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, une élévation de privilèges et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 16.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 25.10",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 14.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68348",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68348"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68361",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68361"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68326",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68326"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-04-03T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-04-03T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-0397",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-04-03T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-04-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8095-5",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8095-5"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8149-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8149-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8141-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8141-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8148-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8148-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8143-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8143-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8145-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8145-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8148-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8148-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8148-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8148-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8143-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8143-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8145-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8145-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8094-5",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8094-5"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8142-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8142-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-04-10 - Updated: 2026-04-10
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
None| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 16.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 25.10",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68348",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68348"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68361",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68361"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68326",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68326"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-04-10T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-04-10T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-0421",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-04-10T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-04-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8164-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8164-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8149-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8149-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-08",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8159-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8159-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-08",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8159-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8159-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8145-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8145-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-08",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8159-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8159-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8165-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8165-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8163-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8163-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8145-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8145-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8152-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8152-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8148-5",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8148-5"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8148-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8148-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8162-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8162-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-05-15 - Updated: 2026-05-15
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 16.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-05-15T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-05-15T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-0602",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-05-15T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-05-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8261-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8261-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8266-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8266-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8180-6",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8180-6"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8254-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8254-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8265-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8265-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8260-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8260-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-07",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8258-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8258-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8267-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8267-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8200-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8200-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-05-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8255-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8255-2"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2025-22125
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-04-16 15:16 - Updated: 2026-06-17 08:45| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10f4ff4baeb6951cf58282954318827b6852d501 | ||
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/73506e581c0b1814cdfd2229d589f30751d7de26 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8a0adf3d778c4a0893c6d34a9e1b0082a6f1c495 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e879a0d9cb086c8e52ce6c04e5bfa63825a6213c | Patch |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/md/raid1.c",
"drivers/md/raid10.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10f4ff4baeb6951cf58282954318827b6852d501",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5404bc7a87b9949cf61e0174b21f80e73239ab25",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "73506e581c0b1814cdfd2229d589f30751d7de26",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5404bc7a87b9949cf61e0174b21f80e73239ab25",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8a0adf3d778c4a0893c6d34a9e1b0082a6f1c495",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5404bc7a87b9949cf61e0174b21f80e73239ab25",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e879a0d9cb086c8e52ce6c04e5bfa63825a6213c",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5404bc7a87b9949cf61e0174b21f80e73239ab25",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/md/raid1.c",
"drivers/md/raid10.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.19"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.19",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.136",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.46",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.14.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.14.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.15",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "FE5F2FD2-E9C2-4521-AED1-C65EBA5BF5D0",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.46",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.19",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "633A38C1-75C8-452D-8F1C-DA0269FD2687",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.14.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.13",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmd/raid1,raid10: don\u0027t ignore IO flags\n\nIf blk-wbt is enabled by default, it\u0027s found that raid write performance\nis quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks,\ndue to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist since\nblk-wbt is introduced.\n\nOther than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, for\nexample REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priority\nreverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, because\nio will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.\n\nFix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.\n\nFises: f51d46d0e7cb (\"md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT\")"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: md/raid1,raid10: no ignorar los indicadores de E/S. Si blk-wbt est\u00e1 habilitado por defecto, el rendimiento de escritura en RAID es bastante bajo, ya que todas las E/S son limitadas por wbt de los discos subyacentes, debido a que se ignora el indicador REQ_IDLE. Resulta que este comportamiento existe desde la introducci\u00f3n de blk-wbt. Adem\u00e1s de REQ_IDLE, tampoco se deben ignorar otros indicadores; por ejemplo, se puede configurar REQ_META para sistemas de archivos; borrarlo puede causar problemas de inversi\u00f3n de prioridad. REQ_NOWAIT tampoco se debe borrar, ya que la E/S esperar\u00e1 en lugar de fallar directamente en los discos subyacentes. Para solucionar estos problemas, mantenga los indicadores de E/S de la bios maestra. Fises: f51d46d0e7cb (\"md: a\u00f1adir soporte para REQ_NOWAIT\")"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-22125",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T08:45:12.100",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-04-16T15:16:06.630",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10f4ff4baeb6951cf58282954318827b6852d501"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/73506e581c0b1814cdfd2229d589f30751d7de26"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8a0adf3d778c4a0893c6d34a9e1b0082a6f1c495"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e879a0d9cb086c8e52ce6c04e5bfa63825a6213c"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
GHSA-3WR8-W2FQ-6Q7V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-16 15:34 – Updated: 2026-04-27 15:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md/raid1,raid10: don't ignore IO flags
If blk-wbt is enabled by default, it's found that raid write performance is quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks, due to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist since blk-wbt is introduced.
Other than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, for example REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priority reverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, because io will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.
Fix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.
Fises: f51d46d0e7cb ("md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT")
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-22125"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-16T15:16:06Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmd/raid1,raid10: don\u0027t ignore IO flags\n\nIf blk-wbt is enabled by default, it\u0027s found that raid write performance\nis quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks,\ndue to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist since\nblk-wbt is introduced.\n\nOther than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, for\nexample REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priority\nreverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, because\nio will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.\n\nFix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.\n\nFises: f51d46d0e7cb (\"md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT\")",
"id": "GHSA-3wr8-w2fq-6q7v",
"modified": "2026-04-27T15:30:28Z",
"published": "2025-04-16T15:34:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22125"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10f4ff4baeb6951cf58282954318827b6852d501"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/73506e581c0b1814cdfd2229d589f30751d7de26"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8a0adf3d778c4a0893c6d34a9e1b0082a6f1c495"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e879a0d9cb086c8e52ce6c04e5bfa63825a6213c"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
MSRC_CVE-2025-22125
Vulnerability from csaf_microsoft - Published: 2025-09-03 21:54 - Updated: 2026-09-13 01:50OESA-2025-1463 (CVE-2024-58093)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2025-05-09 11:08 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:08 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removal
Before 456d8aa37d0f ("PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal to avoid use-after-free"), we would free the ASPM link only after the last function on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.
That was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function, link->downstream would point to free'd memory after.
After above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any function removal on the bus pertaining to a given link.
That is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstream port, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link which still remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.
The resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, because pciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.
On that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus. Free exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link is obsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: add check read-only before truncation in jfs_truncate_nolock()
Added a check for "read-only" mode in the jfs_truncate_nolock
function to avoid errors related to writing to a read-only
filesystem.
Call stack:
block_write_begin() { jfs_write_failed() { jfs_truncate() { jfs_truncate_nolock() { txEnd() { ... log = JFS_SBI(tblk->sb)->log; // (log == NULL)
If the isReadOnly(ip) condition is triggered in
jfs_truncate_nolock, the function execution will stop, and no
further data modification will occur. Instead, the xtTruncate
function will be called with the "COMMIT_WMAP" flag, preventing
modifications in "read-only" mode.(CVE-2024-58094)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
vmxnet3: Fix packet corruption in vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_frame
Andrew and Nikolay reported connectivity issues with Cilium's service load-balancing in case of vmxnet3.
If a BPF program for native XDP adds an encapsulation header such as IPIP and transmits the packet out the same interface, then in case of vmxnet3 a corrupted packet is being sent and subsequently dropped on the path.
vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_frame() which is called e.g. via vmxnet3_run_xdp() through vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_back() calculates an incorrect DMA address:
page = virt_to_page(xdpf->data); tbi->dma_addr = page_pool_get_dma_addr(page) + VMXNET3_XDP_HEADROOM; dma_sync_single_for_device(&adapter->pdev->dev, tbi->dma_addr, buf_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
The above assumes a fixed offset (VMXNET3_XDP_HEADROOM), but the XDP BPF program could have moved xdp->data. While the passed buf_size is correct (xdpf->len), the dma_addr needs to have a dynamic offset which can be calculated as xdpf->data - (void *)xdpf, that is, xdp->data - xdp->data_hard_start.(CVE-2024-58099)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rds: sysctl: rds_tcp_{rcv,snd}buf: avoid using current->nsproxy
As mentioned in a previous commit of this series, using the 'net' structure via 'current' is not recommended for different reasons:
-
Inconsistency: getting info from the reader's/writer's netns vs only from the opener's netns.
-
current->nsproxy can be NULL in some cases, resulting in an 'Oops' (null-ptr-deref), e.g. when the current task is exiting, as spotted by syzbot [1] using acct(2).
The per-netns structure can be obtained from the table->data using container_of(), then the 'net' one can be retrieved from the listen socket (if available).(CVE-2025-21635)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: hns3: make sure ptp clock is unregister and freed if hclge_ptp_get_cycle returns an error
During the initialization of ptp, hclge_ptp_get_cycle might return an error and returned directly without unregister clock and free it. To avoid that, call hclge_ptp_destroy_clock to unregist and free clock if hclge_ptp_get_cycle failed.(CVE-2025-21924)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
HID: appleir: Fix potential NULL dereference at raw event handle
Syzkaller reports a NULL pointer dereference issue in input_event().
BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:68 [inline] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in is_event_supported drivers/input/input.c:67 [inline] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in input_event+0x42/0xa0 drivers/input/input.c:395 Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000028 by task syz-executor199/2949
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2949 Comm: syz-executor199 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-syzkaller-00076-gf097a36ef88d #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 kasan_report+0xd9/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:602 check_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:183 [inline] kasan_check_range+0xef/0x1a0 mm/kasan/generic.c:189 instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:68 [inline] _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline] is_event_supported drivers/input/input.c:67 [inline] input_event+0x42/0xa0 drivers/input/input.c:395 input_report_key include/linux/input.h:439 [inline] key_down drivers/hid/hid-appleir.c:159 [inline] appleir_raw_event+0x3e5/0x5e0 drivers/hid/hid-appleir.c:232 __hid_input_report.constprop.0+0x312/0x440 drivers/hid/hid-core.c:2111 hid_ctrl+0x49f/0x550 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:484 __usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x389/0x6e0 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1650 usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x396/0x450 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1734 dummy_timer+0x17f7/0x3960 drivers/usb/gadget/udc/dummy_hcd.c:1993 __run_hrtimer kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1739 [inline] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x20a/0xae0 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1803 hrtimer_run_softirq+0x17d/0x350 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1820 handle_softirqs+0x206/0x8d0 kernel/softirq.c:561 __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:595 [inline] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:435 [inline] __irq_exit_rcu+0xfa/0x160 kernel/softirq.c:662 irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:678 instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 [inline] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x90/0xb0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 </IRQ> <TASK> asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:702 __mod_timer+0x8f6/0xdc0 kernel/time/timer.c:1185 add_timer+0x62/0x90 kernel/time/timer.c:1295 schedule_timeout+0x11f/0x280 kernel/time/sleep_timeout.c:98 usbhid_wait_io+0x1c7/0x380 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:645 usbhid_init_reports+0x19f/0x390 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:784 hiddev_ioctl+0x1133/0x15b0 drivers/hid/usbhid/hiddev.c:794 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:892 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x190/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK>
This happens due to the malformed report items sent by the emulated device which results in a report, that has no fields, being added to the report list. Due to this appleir_input_configured() is never called, hidinput_connect() fails which results in the HID_CLAIMED_INPUT flag is not being set. However, it does not make appleir_probe() fail and lets the event callback to be called without the associated input device.
Thus, add a check for the HID_CLAIMED_INPUT flag and leave the event hook early if the driver didn't claim any input_dev for some reason. Moreover, some other hid drivers accessing input_dev in their event callbacks do have similar checks, too.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2025-21948)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qla1280: Fix kernel oops when debug level > 2
A null dereference or oops exception will eventually occur when qla1280.c driver is compiled with DEBUG_QLA1280 enabled and ql_debug_level > 2. I think its clear from the code that the intention here is sg_dma_len(s) not length of sg_next(s) when printing the debug info.(CVE-2025-21957)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: cfg80211: cancel wiphy_work before freeing wiphy
A wiphy_work can be queued from the moment the wiphy is allocated and initialized (i.e. wiphy_new_nm). When a wiphy_work is queued, the rdev::wiphy_work is getting queued.
If wiphy_free is called before the rdev::wiphy_work had a chance to run, the wiphy memory will be freed, and then when it eventally gets to run it'll use invalid memory.
Fix this by canceling the work before freeing the wiphy.(CVE-2025-21979)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/hns: Fix soft lockup during bt pages loop
Driver runs a for-loop when allocating bt pages and mapping them with buffer pages. When a large buffer (e.g. MR over 100GB) is being allocated, it may require a considerable loop count. This will lead to soft lockup:
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#27 stuck for 22s!
...
Call trace:
hem_list_alloc_mid_bt+0x124/0x394 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_hem_list_request+0xf8/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_mtr_create+0x2e4/0x360 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
alloc_mr_pbl+0xd4/0x17c [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0xf8/0x190 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x118/0x290
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 23s!
...
Call trace:
hns_roce_hem_list_find_mtt+0x7c/0xb0 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
mtr_map_bufs+0xc4/0x204 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_mtr_create+0x31c/0x3c4 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
alloc_mr_pbl+0xb0/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0x108/0x1c0 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x120/0x2bc
Add a cond_resched() to fix soft lockup during these loops. In order not to affect the allocation performance of normal-size buffer, set the loop count of a 100GB MR as the threshold to call cond_resched().(CVE-2025-22010)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: pdr: Fix the potential deadlock
When some client process A call pdr_add_lookup() to add the look up for the service and does schedule locator work, later a process B got a new server packet indicating locator is up and call pdr_locator_new_server() which eventually sets pdr->locator_init_complete to true which process A sees and takes list lock and queries domain list but it will timeout due to deadlock as the response will queued to the same qmi->wq and it is ordered workqueue and process B is not able to complete new server request work due to deadlock on list lock.
Fix it by removing the unnecessary list iteration as the list iteration is already being done inside locator work, so avoid it here and just call schedule_work() here.
Process A Process B
process_scheduled_works()
pdr_add_lookup() qmi_data_ready_work() process_scheduled_works() pdr_locator_new_server() pdr->locator_init_complete=true; pdr_locator_work() mutex_lock(&pdr->list_lock);
pdr_locate_service() mutex_lock(&pdr->list_lock);
pdr_get_domain_list()
pr_err("PDR: %s get domain list
txn wait failed: %d\n",
req->service_name,
ret);
Timeout error log due to deadlock:
" PDR: tms/servreg get domain list txn wait failed: -110 PDR: service lookup for msm/adsp/sensor_pd:tms/servreg failed: -110 "
Thanks to Bjorn and Johan for letting me know that this commit also fixes an audio regression when using the in-kernel pd-mapper as that makes it easier to hit this race. 1
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/migrate: fix shmem xarray update during migration
A shmem folio can be either in page cache or in swap cache, but not at the same time. Namely, once it is in swap cache, folio->mapping should be NULL, and the folio is no longer in a shmem mapping.
In __folio_migrate_mapping(), to determine the number of xarray entries to update, folio_test_swapbacked() is used, but that conflates shmem in page cache case and shmem in swap cache case. It leads to xarray multi-index entry corruption, since it turns a sibling entry to a normal entry during xas_store() (see [1] for a userspace reproduction). Fix it by only using folio_test_swapcache() to determine whether xarray is storing swap cache entries or not to choose the right number of xarray entries to update.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Z8idPCkaJW1IChjT@casper.infradead.org/
Note: In __split_huge_page(), folio_test_anon() && folio_test_swapcache() is used to get swap_cache address space, but that ignores the shmem folio in swap cache case. It could lead to NULL pointer dereferencing when a in-swap-cache shmem folio is split at __xa_store(), since !folio_test_anon() is true and folio->mapping is NULL. But fortunately, its caller split_huge_page_to_list_to_order() bails out early with EBUSY when folio->mapping is NULL. So no need to take care of it here.(CVE-2025-22015)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: streamzap: fix race between device disconnection and urb callback
Syzkaller has reported a general protection fault at function ir_raw_event_store_with_filter(). This crash is caused by a NULL pointer dereference of dev->raw pointer, even though it is checked for NULL in the same function, which means there is a race condition. It occurs due to the incorrect order of actions in the streamzap_disconnect() function: rc_unregister_device() is called before usb_kill_urb(). The dev->raw pointer is freed and set to NULL in rc_unregister_device(), and only after that usb_kill_urb() waits for in-progress requests to finish.
If rc_unregister_device() is called while streamzap_callback() handler is not finished, this can lead to accessing freed resources. Thus rc_unregister_device() should be called after usb_kill_urb().
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2025-22027)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: fix session use-after-free in multichannel connection
There is a race condition between session setup and ksmbd_sessions_deregister. The session can be freed before the connection is added to channel list of session. This patch check reference count of session before freeing it.(CVE-2025-22040)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: fix use-after-free in ksmbd_sessions_deregister()
In multichannel mode, UAF issue can occur in session_deregister when the second channel sets up a session through the connection of the first channel. session that is freed through the global session table can be accessed again through ->sessions of connection.(CVE-2025-22041)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
acpi: nfit: fix narrowing conversion in acpi_nfit_ctl
Syzkaller has reported a warning in to_nfit_bus_uuid(): "only secondary bus families can be translated". This warning is emited if the argument is equal to NVDIMM_BUS_FAMILY_NFIT == 0. Function acpi_nfit_ctl() first verifies that a user-provided value call_pkg->nd_family of type u64 is not equal to 0. Then the value is converted to int, and only after that is compared to NVDIMM_BUS_FAMILY_MAX. This can lead to passing an invalid argument to acpi_nfit_ctl(), if call_pkg->nd_family is non-zero, while the lower 32 bits are zero.
Furthermore, it is best to return EINVAL immediately upon seeing the invalid user input. The WARNING is insufficient to prevent further undefined behavior based on other invalid user input.
All checks of the input value should be applied to the original variable call_pkg->nd_family.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
x86/mm: Fix flush_tlb_range() when used for zapping normal PMDs
On the following path, flush_tlb_range() can be used for zapping normal PMD entries (PMD entries that point to page tables) together with the PTE entries in the pointed-to page table:
collapse_pte_mapped_thp
pmdp_collapse_flush
flush_tlb_range
The arm64 version of flush_tlb_range() has a comment describing that it can be used for page table removal, and does not use any last-level invalidation optimizations. Fix the X86 version by making it behave the same way.
Currently, X86 only uses this information for the following two purposes, which I think means the issue doesn't have much impact:
- In native_flush_tlb_multi() for checking if lazy TLB CPUs need to be IPI'd to avoid issues with speculative page table walks.
- In Hyper-V TLB paravirtualization, again for lazy TLB stuff.
The patch "x86/mm: only invalidate final translations with INVLPGB" which is currently under review (see <https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241230175550.4046587-13-riel@surriel.com/>) would probably be making the impact of this a lot worse.(CVE-2025-22045)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
LoongArch: BPF: Don't override subprog's return value
The verifier test calls: div by 0 in subprog triggers a panic at the
ld.bu instruction. The ld.bu insn is trying to load byte from memory
address returned by the subprog. The subprog actually set the correct
address at the a5 register (dedicated register for BPF return values).
But at commit 73c359d1d356 ("LoongArch: BPF: Sign-extend return values")
we also sign extended a5 to the a0 register (return value in LoongArch).
For function call insn, we later propagate the a0 register back to a5
register. This is right for native calls but wrong for bpf2bpf calls
which expect zero-extended return value in a5 register. So only move a0
to a5 for native calls (i.e. non-BPF_PSEUDO_CALL).(CVE-2025-22048)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
spufs: fix gang directory lifetimes
prior to "[POWERPC] spufs: Fix gang destroy leaks" we used to have a problem with gang lifetimes - creation of a gang returns opened gang directory, which normally gets removed when that gets closed, but if somebody has created a context belonging to that gang and kept it alive until the gang got closed, removal failed and we ended up with a leak.
Unfortunately, it had been fixed the wrong way. Dentry of gang directory was no longer pinned, and rmdir on close was gone. One problem was that failure of open kept calling simple_rmdir() as cleanup, which meant an unbalanced dput(). Another bug was in the success case - gang creation incremented link count on root directory, but that was no longer undone when gang got destroyed.
Fix consists of * reverting the commit in question * adding a counter to gang, protected by ->i_rwsem of gang directory inode. * having it set to 1 at creation time, dropped in both spufs_dir_close() and spufs_gang_close() and bumped in spufs_create_context(), provided that it's not 0. * using simple_recursive_removal() to take the gang directory out when counter reaches zero.(CVE-2025-22072)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI: brcmstb: Fix error path after a call to regulator_bulk_get()
If the regulator_bulk_get() returns an error and no regulators are created, we need to set their number to zero.
If we don't do this and the PCIe link up fails, a call to the regulator_bulk_free() will result in a kernel panic.
While at it, print the error value, as we cannot return an error upwards as the kernel will WARN() on an error from add_bus().
kwilczynski: commit log, use comma in the message to match style with other similar messages
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: avoid journaling sb update on error if journal is destroying
Presently we always BUG_ON if trying to start a transaction on a journal marked with JBD2_UNMOUNT, since this should never happen. However, while ltp running stress tests, it was observed that in case of some error handling paths, it is possible for update_super_work to start a transaction after the journal is destroyed eg:
(umount) ext4_kill_sb kill_block_super generic_shutdown_super sync_filesystem / commits all txns / evict_inodes / might start a new txn / ext4_put_super flush_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work) / flush the workqueue / jbd2_journal_destroy journal_kill_thread journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT; jbd2_journal_commit_transaction jbd2_journal_get_descriptor_buffer jbd2_journal_bmap ext4_journal_bmap ext4_map_blocks ... ext4_inode_error ext4_handle_error schedule_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work)
/* work queue kicks in */
update_super_work
jbd2_journal_start
start_this_handle
BUG_ON(journal->j_flags &
JBD2_UNMOUNT)
Hence, introduce a new mount flag to indicate journal is destroying and only do a journaled (and deferred) update of sb if this flag is not set. Otherwise, just fallback to an un-journaled commit.
Further, in the journal destroy path, we have the following sequence:
- Set mount flag indicating journal is destroying
- force a commit and wait for it
- flush pending sb updates
This sequence is important as it ensures that, after this point, there is no sb update that might be journaled so it is safe to update the sb outside the journal. (To avoid race discussed in 2d01ddc86606)
Also, we don't need a similar check in ext4_grp_locked_error since it is only called from mballoc and AFAICT it would be always valid to schedule work here.(CVE-2025-22113)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: fix out-of-bound read in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all()
There's issue as follows: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88807b003000 by task syz-executor.0/15172
CPU: 3 PID: 15172 Comm: syz-executor.0 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:82 [inline] dump_stack+0xbe/0xfd lib/dump_stack.c:123 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1e/0x280 mm/kasan/report.c:400 __kasan_report.cold+0x6c/0x84 mm/kasan/report.c:560 kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 mm/kasan/report.c:585 ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790 fs/ext4/xattr.c:1137 ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0x4c7/0xda0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2896 ext4_evict_inode+0xb3b/0x1670 fs/ext4/inode.c:323 evict+0x39f/0x880 fs/inode.c:622 iput_final fs/inode.c:1746 [inline] iput fs/inode.c:1772 [inline] iput+0x525/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:1758 ext4_orphan_cleanup fs/ext4/super.c:3298 [inline] ext4_fill_super+0x8c57/0xba40 fs/ext4/super.c:5300 mount_bdev+0x355/0x410 fs/super.c:1446 legacy_get_tree+0xfe/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:611 vfs_get_tree+0x8d/0x2f0 fs/super.c:1576 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2983 [inline] path_mount+0x119a/0x1ad0 fs/namespace.c:3316 do_mount+0xfc/0x110 fs/namespace.c:3329 __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3540 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x219/0x2e0 fs/namespace.c:3514 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0xd1
Memory state around the buggy address: ffff88807b002f00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff88807b002f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >ffff88807b003000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ^ ffff88807b003080: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ffff88807b003100: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
Above issue happens as ext4_xattr_delete_inode() isn't check xattr is valid if xattr is in inode. To solve above issue call xattr_check_inode() check if xattr if valid in inode. In fact, we can directly verify in ext4_iget_extra_inode(), so that there is no divergent verification.(CVE-2025-22121)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md/raid1,raid10: don't ignore IO flags
If blk-wbt is enabled by default, it's found that raid write performance is quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks, due to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist since blk-wbt is introduced.
Other than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, for example REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priority reverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, because io will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.
Fix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.
Fises: f51d46d0e7cb ("md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT")(CVE-2025-22125)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
LoongArch: BPF: Fix off-by-one error in build_prologue()
Vincent reported that running BPF progs with tailcalls on LoongArch causes kernel hard lockup. Debugging the issues shows that the JITed image missing a jirl instruction at the end of the epilogue.
There are two passes in JIT compiling, the first pass set the flags and the second pass generates JIT code based on those flags. With BPF progs mixing bpf2bpf and tailcalls, build_prologue() generates N insns in the first pass and then generates N+1 insns in the second pass. This makes epilogue_offset off by one and we will jump to some unexpected insn and cause lockup. Fix this by inserting a nop insn.(CVE-2025-37893)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-89.0.0.83.oe2403"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removal\n\nBefore 456d8aa37d0f (\u0026quot;PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal to\navoid use-after-free\u0026quot;), we would free the ASPM link only after the last\nfunction on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.\n\nThat was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,\nlink-\u0026gt;downstream would point to free\u0026apos;d memory after.\n\nAfter above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any function\nremoval on the bus pertaining to a given link.\n\nThat is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstream\nport, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link which\nstill remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.\n\nThe resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, because\npciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.\n\nOn that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.\nFree exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link is\nobsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.\n\n[kwilczynski: commit log](CVE-2024-58093)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\njfs: add check read-only before truncation in jfs_truncate_nolock()\n\nAdded a check for \u0026quot;read-only\u0026quot; mode in the `jfs_truncate_nolock`\nfunction to avoid errors related to writing to a read-only\nfilesystem.\n\nCall stack:\n\nblock_write_begin() {\n jfs_write_failed() {\n jfs_truncate() {\n jfs_truncate_nolock() {\n txEnd() {\n ...\n log = JFS_SBI(tblk-\u0026gt;sb)-\u0026gt;log;\n // (log == NULL)\n\nIf the `isReadOnly(ip)` condition is triggered in\n`jfs_truncate_nolock`, the function execution will stop, and no\nfurther data modification will occur. Instead, the `xtTruncate`\nfunction will be called with the \u0026quot;COMMIT_WMAP\u0026quot; flag, preventing\nmodifications in \u0026quot;read-only\u0026quot; mode.(CVE-2024-58094)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nvmxnet3: Fix packet corruption in vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_frame\n\nAndrew and Nikolay reported connectivity issues with Cilium\u0026apos;s service\nload-balancing in case of vmxnet3.\n\nIf a BPF program for native XDP adds an encapsulation header such as\nIPIP and transmits the packet out the same interface, then in case\nof vmxnet3 a corrupted packet is being sent and subsequently dropped\non the path.\n\nvmxnet3_xdp_xmit_frame() which is called e.g. via vmxnet3_run_xdp()\nthrough vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_back() calculates an incorrect DMA address:\n\n page = virt_to_page(xdpf-\u0026gt;data);\n tbi-\u0026gt;dma_addr = page_pool_get_dma_addr(page) +\n VMXNET3_XDP_HEADROOM;\n dma_sync_single_for_device(\u0026amp;adapter-\u0026gt;pdev-\u0026gt;dev,\n tbi-\u0026gt;dma_addr, buf_size,\n DMA_TO_DEVICE);\n\nThe above assumes a fixed offset (VMXNET3_XDP_HEADROOM), but the XDP\nBPF program could have moved xdp-\u0026gt;data. While the passed buf_size is\ncorrect (xdpf-\u0026gt;len), the dma_addr needs to have a dynamic offset which\ncan be calculated as xdpf-\u0026gt;data - (void *)xdpf, that is, xdp-\u0026gt;data -\nxdp-\u0026gt;data_hard_start.(CVE-2024-58099)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrds: sysctl: rds_tcp_{rcv,snd}buf: avoid using current-\u0026gt;nsproxy\n\nAs mentioned in a previous commit of this series, using the \u0026apos;net\u0026apos;\nstructure via \u0026apos;current\u0026apos; is not recommended for different reasons:\n\n- Inconsistency: getting info from the reader\u0026apos;s/writer\u0026apos;s netns vs only\n from the opener\u0026apos;s netns.\n\n- current-\u0026gt;nsproxy can be NULL in some cases, resulting in an \u0026apos;Oops\u0026apos;\n (null-ptr-deref), e.g. when the current task is exiting, as spotted by\n syzbot [1] using acct(2).\n\nThe per-netns structure can be obtained from the table-\u0026gt;data using\ncontainer_of(), then the \u0026apos;net\u0026apos; one can be retrieved from the listen\nsocket (if available).(CVE-2025-21635)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: hns3: make sure ptp clock is unregister and freed if hclge_ptp_get_cycle returns an error\n\nDuring the initialization of ptp, hclge_ptp_get_cycle might return an error\nand returned directly without unregister clock and free it. To avoid that,\ncall hclge_ptp_destroy_clock to unregist and free clock if\nhclge_ptp_get_cycle failed.(CVE-2025-21924)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nHID: appleir: Fix potential NULL dereference at raw event handle\n\nSyzkaller reports a NULL pointer dereference issue in input_event().\n\nBUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:68 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in is_event_supported drivers/input/input.c:67 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in input_event+0x42/0xa0 drivers/input/input.c:395\nRead of size 8 at addr 0000000000000028 by task syz-executor199/2949\n\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2949 Comm: syz-executor199 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-syzkaller-00076-gf097a36ef88d #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120\n kasan_report+0xd9/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:602\n check_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:183 [inline]\n kasan_check_range+0xef/0x1a0 mm/kasan/generic.c:189\n instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:68 [inline]\n _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline]\n is_event_supported drivers/input/input.c:67 [inline]\n input_event+0x42/0xa0 drivers/input/input.c:395\n input_report_key include/linux/input.h:439 [inline]\n key_down drivers/hid/hid-appleir.c:159 [inline]\n appleir_raw_event+0x3e5/0x5e0 drivers/hid/hid-appleir.c:232\n __hid_input_report.constprop.0+0x312/0x440 drivers/hid/hid-core.c:2111\n hid_ctrl+0x49f/0x550 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:484\n __usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x389/0x6e0 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1650\n usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x396/0x450 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1734\n dummy_timer+0x17f7/0x3960 drivers/usb/gadget/udc/dummy_hcd.c:1993\n __run_hrtimer kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1739 [inline]\n __hrtimer_run_queues+0x20a/0xae0 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1803\n hrtimer_run_softirq+0x17d/0x350 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1820\n handle_softirqs+0x206/0x8d0 kernel/softirq.c:561\n __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:595 [inline]\n invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:435 [inline]\n __irq_exit_rcu+0xfa/0x160 kernel/softirq.c:662\n irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:678\n instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 [inline]\n sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x90/0xb0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:702\n __mod_timer+0x8f6/0xdc0 kernel/time/timer.c:1185\n add_timer+0x62/0x90 kernel/time/timer.c:1295\n schedule_timeout+0x11f/0x280 kernel/time/sleep_timeout.c:98\n usbhid_wait_io+0x1c7/0x380 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:645\n usbhid_init_reports+0x19f/0x390 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:784\n hiddev_ioctl+0x1133/0x15b0 drivers/hid/usbhid/hiddev.c:794\n vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:892 [inline]\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x190/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:892\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\nThis happens due to the malformed report items sent by the emulated device\nwhich results in a report, that has no fields, being added to the report list.\nDue to this appleir_input_configured() is never called, hidinput_connect()\nfails which results in the HID_CLAIMED_INPUT flag is not being set. However,\nit does not make appleir_probe() fail and lets the event callback to be\ncalled without the associated input device.\n\nThus, add a check for the HID_CLAIMED_INPUT flag and leave the event hook\nearly if the driver didn\u0026apos;t claim any input_dev for some reason. Moreover,\nsome other hid drivers accessing input_dev in their event callbacks do have\nsimilar checks, too.\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2025-21948)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: qla1280: Fix kernel oops when debug level \u0026gt; 2\n\nA null dereference or oops exception will eventually occur when qla1280.c\ndriver is compiled with DEBUG_QLA1280 enabled and ql_debug_level \u0026gt; 2. I\nthink its clear from the code that the intention here is sg_dma_len(s) not\nlength of sg_next(s) when printing the debug info.(CVE-2025-21957)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: cfg80211: cancel wiphy_work before freeing wiphy\n\nA wiphy_work can be queued from the moment the wiphy is allocated and\ninitialized (i.e. wiphy_new_nm). When a wiphy_work is queued, the\nrdev::wiphy_work is getting queued.\n\nIf wiphy_free is called before the rdev::wiphy_work had a chance to run,\nthe wiphy memory will be freed, and then when it eventally gets to run\nit\u0026apos;ll use invalid memory.\n\nFix this by canceling the work before freeing the wiphy.(CVE-2025-21979)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nRDMA/hns: Fix soft lockup during bt pages loop\n\nDriver runs a for-loop when allocating bt pages and mapping them with\nbuffer pages. When a large buffer (e.g. MR over 100GB) is being allocated,\nit may require a considerable loop count. This will lead to soft lockup:\n\n watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#27 stuck for 22s!\n ...\n Call trace:\n hem_list_alloc_mid_bt+0x124/0x394 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_hem_list_request+0xf8/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_mtr_create+0x2e4/0x360 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n alloc_mr_pbl+0xd4/0x17c [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0xf8/0x190 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x118/0x290\n\n watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 23s!\n ...\n Call trace:\n hns_roce_hem_list_find_mtt+0x7c/0xb0 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n mtr_map_bufs+0xc4/0x204 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_mtr_create+0x31c/0x3c4 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n alloc_mr_pbl+0xb0/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0x108/0x1c0 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x120/0x2bc\n\nAdd a cond_resched() to fix soft lockup during these loops. In order not\nto affect the allocation performance of normal-size buffer, set the loop\ncount of a 100GB MR as the threshold to call cond_resched().(CVE-2025-22010)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsoc: qcom: pdr: Fix the potential deadlock\n\nWhen some client process A call pdr_add_lookup() to add the look up for\nthe service and does schedule locator work, later a process B got a new\nserver packet indicating locator is up and call pdr_locator_new_server()\nwhich eventually sets pdr-\u0026gt;locator_init_complete to true which process A\nsees and takes list lock and queries domain list but it will timeout due\nto deadlock as the response will queued to the same qmi-\u0026gt;wq and it is\nordered workqueue and process B is not able to complete new server\nrequest work due to deadlock on list lock.\n\nFix it by removing the unnecessary list iteration as the list iteration\nis already being done inside locator work, so avoid it here and just\ncall schedule_work() here.\n\n Process A Process B\n\n process_scheduled_works()\npdr_add_lookup() qmi_data_ready_work()\n process_scheduled_works() pdr_locator_new_server()\n pdr-\u0026gt;locator_init_complete=true;\n pdr_locator_work()\n mutex_lock(\u0026amp;pdr-\u0026gt;list_lock);\n\n pdr_locate_service() mutex_lock(\u0026amp;pdr-\u0026gt;list_lock);\n\n pdr_get_domain_list()\n pr_err(\u0026quot;PDR: %s get domain list\n txn wait failed: %d\\n\u0026quot;,\n req-\u0026gt;service_name,\n ret);\n\nTimeout error log due to deadlock:\n\n\u0026quot;\n PDR: tms/servreg get domain list txn wait failed: -110\n PDR: service lookup for msm/adsp/sensor_pd:tms/servreg failed: -110\n\u0026quot;\n\nThanks to Bjorn and Johan for letting me know that this commit also fixes\nan audio regression when using the in-kernel pd-mapper as that makes it\neasier to hit this race. [1](CVE-2025-22014)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/migrate: fix shmem xarray update during migration\n\nA shmem folio can be either in page cache or in swap cache, but not at the\nsame time. Namely, once it is in swap cache, folio-\u0026gt;mapping should be\nNULL, and the folio is no longer in a shmem mapping.\n\nIn __folio_migrate_mapping(), to determine the number of xarray entries to\nupdate, folio_test_swapbacked() is used, but that conflates shmem in page\ncache case and shmem in swap cache case. It leads to xarray multi-index\nentry corruption, since it turns a sibling entry to a normal entry during\nxas_store() (see [1] for a userspace reproduction). Fix it by only using\nfolio_test_swapcache() to determine whether xarray is storing swap cache\nentries or not to choose the right number of xarray entries to update.\n\n[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Z8idPCkaJW1IChjT@casper.infradead.org/\n\nNote:\nIn __split_huge_page(), folio_test_anon() \u0026amp;\u0026amp; folio_test_swapcache() is\nused to get swap_cache address space, but that ignores the shmem folio in\nswap cache case. It could lead to NULL pointer dereferencing when a\nin-swap-cache shmem folio is split at __xa_store(), since\n!folio_test_anon() is true and folio-\u0026gt;mapping is NULL. But fortunately,\nits caller split_huge_page_to_list_to_order() bails out early with EBUSY\nwhen folio-\u0026gt;mapping is NULL. So no need to take care of it here.(CVE-2025-22015)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: streamzap: fix race between device disconnection and urb callback\n\nSyzkaller has reported a general protection fault at function\nir_raw_event_store_with_filter(). This crash is caused by a NULL pointer\ndereference of dev-\u0026gt;raw pointer, even though it is checked for NULL in\nthe same function, which means there is a race condition. It occurs due\nto the incorrect order of actions in the streamzap_disconnect() function:\nrc_unregister_device() is called before usb_kill_urb(). The dev-\u0026gt;raw\npointer is freed and set to NULL in rc_unregister_device(), and only\nafter that usb_kill_urb() waits for in-progress requests to finish.\n\nIf rc_unregister_device() is called while streamzap_callback() handler is\nnot finished, this can lead to accessing freed resources. Thus\nrc_unregister_device() should be called after usb_kill_urb().\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2025-22027)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nksmbd: fix session use-after-free in multichannel connection\n\nThere is a race condition between session setup and\nksmbd_sessions_deregister. The session can be freed before the connection\nis added to channel list of session.\nThis patch check reference count of session before freeing it.(CVE-2025-22040)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nksmbd: fix use-after-free in ksmbd_sessions_deregister()\n\nIn multichannel mode, UAF issue can occur in session_deregister\nwhen the second channel sets up a session through the connection of\nthe first channel. session that is freed through the global session\ntable can be accessed again through -\u0026gt;sessions of connection.(CVE-2025-22041)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nacpi: nfit: fix narrowing conversion in acpi_nfit_ctl\n\nSyzkaller has reported a warning in to_nfit_bus_uuid(): \u0026quot;only secondary\nbus families can be translated\u0026quot;. This warning is emited if the argument\nis equal to NVDIMM_BUS_FAMILY_NFIT == 0. Function acpi_nfit_ctl() first\nverifies that a user-provided value call_pkg-\u0026gt;nd_family of type u64 is\nnot equal to 0. Then the value is converted to int, and only after that\nis compared to NVDIMM_BUS_FAMILY_MAX. This can lead to passing an invalid\nargument to acpi_nfit_ctl(), if call_pkg-\u0026gt;nd_family is non-zero, while\nthe lower 32 bits are zero.\n\nFurthermore, it is best to return EINVAL immediately upon seeing the\ninvalid user input. The WARNING is insufficient to prevent further\nundefined behavior based on other invalid user input.\n\nAll checks of the input value should be applied to the original variable\ncall_pkg-\u0026gt;nd_family.\n\n[iweiny: update commit message](CVE-2025-22044)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nx86/mm: Fix flush_tlb_range() when used for zapping normal PMDs\n\nOn the following path, flush_tlb_range() can be used for zapping normal\nPMD entries (PMD entries that point to page tables) together with the PTE\nentries in the pointed-to page table:\n\n collapse_pte_mapped_thp\n pmdp_collapse_flush\n flush_tlb_range\n\nThe arm64 version of flush_tlb_range() has a comment describing that it can\nbe used for page table removal, and does not use any last-level\ninvalidation optimizations. Fix the X86 version by making it behave the\nsame way.\n\nCurrently, X86 only uses this information for the following two purposes,\nwhich I think means the issue doesn\u0026apos;t have much impact:\n\n - In native_flush_tlb_multi() for checking if lazy TLB CPUs need to be\n IPI\u0026apos;d to avoid issues with speculative page table walks.\n - In Hyper-V TLB paravirtualization, again for lazy TLB stuff.\n\nThe patch \u0026quot;x86/mm: only invalidate final translations with INVLPGB\u0026quot; which\nis currently under review (see\n\u0026lt;https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241230175550.4046587-13-riel@surriel.com/\u0026gt;)\nwould probably be making the impact of this a lot worse.(CVE-2025-22045)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nLoongArch: BPF: Don\u0026apos;t override subprog\u0026apos;s return value\n\nThe verifier test `calls: div by 0 in subprog` triggers a panic at the\nld.bu instruction. The ld.bu insn is trying to load byte from memory\naddress returned by the subprog. The subprog actually set the correct\naddress at the a5 register (dedicated register for BPF return values).\nBut at commit 73c359d1d356 (\u0026quot;LoongArch: BPF: Sign-extend return values\u0026quot;)\nwe also sign extended a5 to the a0 register (return value in LoongArch).\nFor function call insn, we later propagate the a0 register back to a5\nregister. This is right for native calls but wrong for bpf2bpf calls\nwhich expect zero-extended return value in a5 register. So only move a0\nto a5 for native calls (i.e. non-BPF_PSEUDO_CALL).(CVE-2025-22048)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nspufs: fix gang directory lifetimes\n\nprior to \u0026quot;[POWERPC] spufs: Fix gang destroy leaks\u0026quot; we used to have\na problem with gang lifetimes - creation of a gang returns opened\ngang directory, which normally gets removed when that gets closed,\nbut if somebody has created a context belonging to that gang and\nkept it alive until the gang got closed, removal failed and we\nended up with a leak.\n\nUnfortunately, it had been fixed the wrong way. Dentry of gang\ndirectory was no longer pinned, and rmdir on close was gone.\nOne problem was that failure of open kept calling simple_rmdir()\nas cleanup, which meant an unbalanced dput(). Another bug was\nin the success case - gang creation incremented link count on\nroot directory, but that was no longer undone when gang got\ndestroyed.\n\nFix consists of\n\t* reverting the commit in question\n\t* adding a counter to gang, protected by -\u0026gt;i_rwsem\nof gang directory inode.\n\t* having it set to 1 at creation time, dropped\nin both spufs_dir_close() and spufs_gang_close() and bumped\nin spufs_create_context(), provided that it\u0026apos;s not 0.\n\t* using simple_recursive_removal() to take the gang\ndirectory out when counter reaches zero.(CVE-2025-22072)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI: brcmstb: Fix error path after a call to regulator_bulk_get()\n\nIf the regulator_bulk_get() returns an error and no regulators\nare created, we need to set their number to zero.\n\nIf we don\u0026apos;t do this and the PCIe link up fails, a call to the\nregulator_bulk_free() will result in a kernel panic.\n\nWhile at it, print the error value, as we cannot return an error\nupwards as the kernel will WARN() on an error from add_bus().\n\n[kwilczynski: commit log, use comma in the message to match style with\nother similar messages](CVE-2025-22095)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: avoid journaling sb update on error if journal is destroying\n\nPresently we always BUG_ON if trying to start a transaction on a journal marked\nwith JBD2_UNMOUNT, since this should never happen. However, while ltp running\nstress tests, it was observed that in case of some error handling paths, it is\npossible for update_super_work to start a transaction after the journal is\ndestroyed eg:\n\n(umount)\next4_kill_sb\n kill_block_super\n generic_shutdown_super\n sync_filesystem /* commits all txns */\n evict_inodes\n /* might start a new txn */\n ext4_put_super\n\tflush_work(\u0026amp;sbi-\u0026gt;s_sb_upd_work) /* flush the workqueue */\n jbd2_journal_destroy\n journal_kill_thread\n journal-\u0026gt;j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;\n jbd2_journal_commit_transaction\n jbd2_journal_get_descriptor_buffer\n jbd2_journal_bmap\n ext4_journal_bmap\n ext4_map_blocks\n ...\n ext4_inode_error\n ext4_handle_error\n schedule_work(\u0026amp;sbi-\u0026gt;s_sb_upd_work)\n\n /* work queue kicks in */\n update_super_work\n jbd2_journal_start\n start_this_handle\n BUG_ON(journal-\u0026gt;j_flags \u0026amp;\n JBD2_UNMOUNT)\n\nHence, introduce a new mount flag to indicate journal is destroying and only do\na journaled (and deferred) update of sb if this flag is not set. Otherwise, just\nfallback to an un-journaled commit.\n\nFurther, in the journal destroy path, we have the following sequence:\n\n 1. Set mount flag indicating journal is destroying\n 2. force a commit and wait for it\n 3. flush pending sb updates\n\nThis sequence is important as it ensures that, after this point, there is no sb\nupdate that might be journaled so it is safe to update the sb outside the\njournal. (To avoid race discussed in 2d01ddc86606)\n\nAlso, we don\u0026apos;t need a similar check in ext4_grp_locked_error since it is only\ncalled from mballoc and AFAICT it would be always valid to schedule work here.(CVE-2025-22113)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: fix out-of-bound read in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all()\n\nThere\u0026apos;s issue as follows:\nBUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff88807b003000 by task syz-executor.0/15172\n\nCPU: 3 PID: 15172 Comm: syz-executor.0\nCall Trace:\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:82 [inline]\n dump_stack+0xbe/0xfd lib/dump_stack.c:123\n print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1e/0x280 mm/kasan/report.c:400\n __kasan_report.cold+0x6c/0x84 mm/kasan/report.c:560\n kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 mm/kasan/report.c:585\n ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790 fs/ext4/xattr.c:1137\n ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0x4c7/0xda0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2896\n ext4_evict_inode+0xb3b/0x1670 fs/ext4/inode.c:323\n evict+0x39f/0x880 fs/inode.c:622\n iput_final fs/inode.c:1746 [inline]\n iput fs/inode.c:1772 [inline]\n iput+0x525/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:1758\n ext4_orphan_cleanup fs/ext4/super.c:3298 [inline]\n ext4_fill_super+0x8c57/0xba40 fs/ext4/super.c:5300\n mount_bdev+0x355/0x410 fs/super.c:1446\n legacy_get_tree+0xfe/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:611\n vfs_get_tree+0x8d/0x2f0 fs/super.c:1576\n do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2983 [inline]\n path_mount+0x119a/0x1ad0 fs/namespace.c:3316\n do_mount+0xfc/0x110 fs/namespace.c:3329\n __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3540 [inline]\n __se_sys_mount+0x219/0x2e0 fs/namespace.c:3514\n do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0xd1\n\nMemory state around the buggy address:\n ffff88807b002f00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n ffff88807b002f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n\u0026gt;ffff88807b003000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff\n ^\n ffff88807b003080: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff\n ffff88807b003100: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff\n\nAbove issue happens as ext4_xattr_delete_inode() isn\u0026apos;t check xattr\nis valid if xattr is in inode.\nTo solve above issue call xattr_check_inode() check if xattr if valid\nin inode. In fact, we can directly verify in ext4_iget_extra_inode(),\nso that there is no divergent verification.(CVE-2025-22121)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmd/raid1,raid10: don\u0026apos;t ignore IO flags\n\nIf blk-wbt is enabled by default, it\u0026apos;s found that raid write performance\nis quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks,\ndue to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist since\nblk-wbt is introduced.\n\nOther than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, for\nexample REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priority\nreverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, because\nio will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.\n\nFix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.\n\nFises: f51d46d0e7cb (\u0026quot;md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT\u0026quot;)(CVE-2025-22125)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nLoongArch: BPF: Fix off-by-one error in build_prologue()\n\nVincent reported that running BPF progs with tailcalls on LoongArch\ncauses kernel hard lockup. Debugging the issues shows that the JITed\nimage missing a jirl instruction at the end of the epilogue.\n\nThere are two passes in JIT compiling, the first pass set the flags and\nthe second pass generates JIT code based on those flags. With BPF progs\nmixing bpf2bpf and tailcalls, build_prologue() generates N insns in the\nfirst pass and then generates N+1 insns in the second pass. This makes\nepilogue_offset off by one and we will jump to some unexpected insn and\ncause lockup. Fix this by inserting a nop insn.(CVE-2025-37893)",
"id": "OESA-2025-1463",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:08:33Z",
"published": "2025-05-09T11:08:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-1463"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58093"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58094"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58099"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21635"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21924"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21948"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21957"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21979"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22010"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22014"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22015"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22027"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22040"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22041"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22044"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22045"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22048"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22072"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22095"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22113"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22121"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22125"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37893"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2024-58093",
"CVE-2024-58094",
"CVE-2024-58099",
"CVE-2025-21635",
"CVE-2025-21924",
"CVE-2025-21948",
"CVE-2025-21957",
"CVE-2025-21979",
"CVE-2025-22010",
"CVE-2025-22014",
"CVE-2025-22015",
"CVE-2025-22027",
"CVE-2025-22040",
"CVE-2025-22041",
"CVE-2025-22044",
"CVE-2025-22045",
"CVE-2025-22048",
"CVE-2025-22072",
"CVE-2025-22095",
"CVE-2025-22113",
"CVE-2025-22121",
"CVE-2025-22125",
"CVE-2025-37893"
]
}
OESA-2025-1464 (CVE-2024-58093)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2025-05-09 11:08 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:08 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removal
Before 456d8aa37d0f ("PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal to avoid use-after-free"), we would free the ASPM link only after the last function on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.
That was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function, link->downstream would point to free'd memory after.
After above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any function removal on the bus pertaining to a given link.
That is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstream port, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link which still remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.
The resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, because pciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.
On that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus. Free exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link is obsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: add check read-only before truncation in jfs_truncate_nolock()
Added a check for "read-only" mode in the jfs_truncate_nolock
function to avoid errors related to writing to a read-only
filesystem.
Call stack:
block_write_begin() { jfs_write_failed() { jfs_truncate() { jfs_truncate_nolock() { txEnd() { ... log = JFS_SBI(tblk->sb)->log; // (log == NULL)
If the isReadOnly(ip) condition is triggered in
jfs_truncate_nolock, the function execution will stop, and no
further data modification will occur. Instead, the xtTruncate
function will be called with the "COMMIT_WMAP" flag, preventing
modifications in "read-only" mode.(CVE-2024-58094)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rds: sysctl: rds_tcp_{rcv,snd}buf: avoid using current->nsproxy
As mentioned in a previous commit of this series, using the 'net' structure via 'current' is not recommended for different reasons:
-
Inconsistency: getting info from the reader's/writer's netns vs only from the opener's netns.
-
current->nsproxy can be NULL in some cases, resulting in an 'Oops' (null-ptr-deref), e.g. when the current task is exiting, as spotted by syzbot [1] using acct(2).
The per-netns structure can be obtained from the table->data using container_of(), then the 'net' one can be retrieved from the listen socket (if available).(CVE-2025-21635)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
HID: appleir: Fix potential NULL dereference at raw event handle
Syzkaller reports a NULL pointer dereference issue in input_event().
BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:68 [inline] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in is_event_supported drivers/input/input.c:67 [inline] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in input_event+0x42/0xa0 drivers/input/input.c:395 Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000028 by task syz-executor199/2949
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2949 Comm: syz-executor199 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-syzkaller-00076-gf097a36ef88d #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 kasan_report+0xd9/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:602 check_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:183 [inline] kasan_check_range+0xef/0x1a0 mm/kasan/generic.c:189 instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:68 [inline] _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline] is_event_supported drivers/input/input.c:67 [inline] input_event+0x42/0xa0 drivers/input/input.c:395 input_report_key include/linux/input.h:439 [inline] key_down drivers/hid/hid-appleir.c:159 [inline] appleir_raw_event+0x3e5/0x5e0 drivers/hid/hid-appleir.c:232 __hid_input_report.constprop.0+0x312/0x440 drivers/hid/hid-core.c:2111 hid_ctrl+0x49f/0x550 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:484 __usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x389/0x6e0 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1650 usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x396/0x450 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1734 dummy_timer+0x17f7/0x3960 drivers/usb/gadget/udc/dummy_hcd.c:1993 __run_hrtimer kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1739 [inline] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x20a/0xae0 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1803 hrtimer_run_softirq+0x17d/0x350 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1820 handle_softirqs+0x206/0x8d0 kernel/softirq.c:561 __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:595 [inline] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:435 [inline] __irq_exit_rcu+0xfa/0x160 kernel/softirq.c:662 irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:678 instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 [inline] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x90/0xb0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 </IRQ> <TASK> asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:702 __mod_timer+0x8f6/0xdc0 kernel/time/timer.c:1185 add_timer+0x62/0x90 kernel/time/timer.c:1295 schedule_timeout+0x11f/0x280 kernel/time/sleep_timeout.c:98 usbhid_wait_io+0x1c7/0x380 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:645 usbhid_init_reports+0x19f/0x390 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:784 hiddev_ioctl+0x1133/0x15b0 drivers/hid/usbhid/hiddev.c:794 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:892 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x190/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK>
This happens due to the malformed report items sent by the emulated device which results in a report, that has no fields, being added to the report list. Due to this appleir_input_configured() is never called, hidinput_connect() fails which results in the HID_CLAIMED_INPUT flag is not being set. However, it does not make appleir_probe() fail and lets the event callback to be called without the associated input device.
Thus, add a check for the HID_CLAIMED_INPUT flag and leave the event hook early if the driver didn't claim any input_dev for some reason. Moreover, some other hid drivers accessing input_dev in their event callbacks do have similar checks, too.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2025-21948)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qla1280: Fix kernel oops when debug level > 2
A null dereference or oops exception will eventually occur when qla1280.c driver is compiled with DEBUG_QLA1280 enabled and ql_debug_level > 2. I think its clear from the code that the intention here is sg_dma_len(s) not length of sg_next(s) when printing the debug info.(CVE-2025-21957)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: cfg80211: cancel wiphy_work before freeing wiphy
A wiphy_work can be queued from the moment the wiphy is allocated and initialized (i.e. wiphy_new_nm). When a wiphy_work is queued, the rdev::wiphy_work is getting queued.
If wiphy_free is called before the rdev::wiphy_work had a chance to run, the wiphy memory will be freed, and then when it eventally gets to run it'll use invalid memory.
Fix this by canceling the work before freeing the wiphy.(CVE-2025-21979)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/hns: Fix soft lockup during bt pages loop
Driver runs a for-loop when allocating bt pages and mapping them with buffer pages. When a large buffer (e.g. MR over 100GB) is being allocated, it may require a considerable loop count. This will lead to soft lockup:
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#27 stuck for 22s!
...
Call trace:
hem_list_alloc_mid_bt+0x124/0x394 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_hem_list_request+0xf8/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_mtr_create+0x2e4/0x360 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
alloc_mr_pbl+0xd4/0x17c [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0xf8/0x190 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x118/0x290
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 23s!
...
Call trace:
hns_roce_hem_list_find_mtt+0x7c/0xb0 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
mtr_map_bufs+0xc4/0x204 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_mtr_create+0x31c/0x3c4 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
alloc_mr_pbl+0xb0/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0x108/0x1c0 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x120/0x2bc
Add a cond_resched() to fix soft lockup during these loops. In order not to affect the allocation performance of normal-size buffer, set the loop count of a 100GB MR as the threshold to call cond_resched().(CVE-2025-22010)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: pdr: Fix the potential deadlock
When some client process A call pdr_add_lookup() to add the look up for the service and does schedule locator work, later a process B got a new server packet indicating locator is up and call pdr_locator_new_server() which eventually sets pdr->locator_init_complete to true which process A sees and takes list lock and queries domain list but it will timeout due to deadlock as the response will queued to the same qmi->wq and it is ordered workqueue and process B is not able to complete new server request work due to deadlock on list lock.
Fix it by removing the unnecessary list iteration as the list iteration is already being done inside locator work, so avoid it here and just call schedule_work() here.
Process A Process B
process_scheduled_works()
pdr_add_lookup() qmi_data_ready_work() process_scheduled_works() pdr_locator_new_server() pdr->locator_init_complete=true; pdr_locator_work() mutex_lock(&pdr->list_lock);
pdr_locate_service() mutex_lock(&pdr->list_lock);
pdr_get_domain_list()
pr_err("PDR: %s get domain list
txn wait failed: %d\n",
req->service_name,
ret);
Timeout error log due to deadlock:
" PDR: tms/servreg get domain list txn wait failed: -110 PDR: service lookup for msm/adsp/sensor_pd:tms/servreg failed: -110 "
Thanks to Bjorn and Johan for letting me know that this commit also fixes an audio regression when using the in-kernel pd-mapper as that makes it easier to hit this race. 1
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/migrate: fix shmem xarray update during migration
A shmem folio can be either in page cache or in swap cache, but not at the same time. Namely, once it is in swap cache, folio->mapping should be NULL, and the folio is no longer in a shmem mapping.
In __folio_migrate_mapping(), to determine the number of xarray entries to update, folio_test_swapbacked() is used, but that conflates shmem in page cache case and shmem in swap cache case. It leads to xarray multi-index entry corruption, since it turns a sibling entry to a normal entry during xas_store() (see [1] for a userspace reproduction). Fix it by only using folio_test_swapcache() to determine whether xarray is storing swap cache entries or not to choose the right number of xarray entries to update.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Z8idPCkaJW1IChjT@casper.infradead.org/
Note: In __split_huge_page(), folio_test_anon() && folio_test_swapcache() is used to get swap_cache address space, but that ignores the shmem folio in swap cache case. It could lead to NULL pointer dereferencing when a in-swap-cache shmem folio is split at __xa_store(), since !folio_test_anon() is true and folio->mapping is NULL. But fortunately, its caller split_huge_page_to_list_to_order() bails out early with EBUSY when folio->mapping is NULL. So no need to take care of it here.(CVE-2025-22015)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: streamzap: fix race between device disconnection and urb callback
Syzkaller has reported a general protection fault at function ir_raw_event_store_with_filter(). This crash is caused by a NULL pointer dereference of dev->raw pointer, even though it is checked for NULL in the same function, which means there is a race condition. It occurs due to the incorrect order of actions in the streamzap_disconnect() function: rc_unregister_device() is called before usb_kill_urb(). The dev->raw pointer is freed and set to NULL in rc_unregister_device(), and only after that usb_kill_urb() waits for in-progress requests to finish.
If rc_unregister_device() is called while streamzap_callback() handler is not finished, this can lead to accessing freed resources. Thus rc_unregister_device() should be called after usb_kill_urb().
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2025-22027)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: fix session use-after-free in multichannel connection
There is a race condition between session setup and ksmbd_sessions_deregister. The session can be freed before the connection is added to channel list of session. This patch check reference count of session before freeing it.(CVE-2025-22040)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: fix use-after-free in ksmbd_sessions_deregister()
In multichannel mode, UAF issue can occur in session_deregister when the second channel sets up a session through the connection of the first channel. session that is freed through the global session table can be accessed again through ->sessions of connection.(CVE-2025-22041)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
acpi: nfit: fix narrowing conversion in acpi_nfit_ctl
Syzkaller has reported a warning in to_nfit_bus_uuid(): "only secondary bus families can be translated". This warning is emited if the argument is equal to NVDIMM_BUS_FAMILY_NFIT == 0. Function acpi_nfit_ctl() first verifies that a user-provided value call_pkg->nd_family of type u64 is not equal to 0. Then the value is converted to int, and only after that is compared to NVDIMM_BUS_FAMILY_MAX. This can lead to passing an invalid argument to acpi_nfit_ctl(), if call_pkg->nd_family is non-zero, while the lower 32 bits are zero.
Furthermore, it is best to return EINVAL immediately upon seeing the invalid user input. The WARNING is insufficient to prevent further undefined behavior based on other invalid user input.
All checks of the input value should be applied to the original variable call_pkg->nd_family.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
x86/mm: Fix flush_tlb_range() when used for zapping normal PMDs
On the following path, flush_tlb_range() can be used for zapping normal PMD entries (PMD entries that point to page tables) together with the PTE entries in the pointed-to page table:
collapse_pte_mapped_thp
pmdp_collapse_flush
flush_tlb_range
The arm64 version of flush_tlb_range() has a comment describing that it can be used for page table removal, and does not use any last-level invalidation optimizations. Fix the X86 version by making it behave the same way.
Currently, X86 only uses this information for the following two purposes, which I think means the issue doesn't have much impact:
- In native_flush_tlb_multi() for checking if lazy TLB CPUs need to be IPI'd to avoid issues with speculative page table walks.
- In Hyper-V TLB paravirtualization, again for lazy TLB stuff.
The patch "x86/mm: only invalidate final translations with INVLPGB" which is currently under review (see <https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241230175550.4046587-13-riel@surriel.com/>) would probably be making the impact of this a lot worse.(CVE-2025-22045)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
LoongArch: BPF: Don't override subprog's return value
The verifier test calls: div by 0 in subprog triggers a panic at the
ld.bu instruction. The ld.bu insn is trying to load byte from memory
address returned by the subprog. The subprog actually set the correct
address at the a5 register (dedicated register for BPF return values).
But at commit 73c359d1d356 ("LoongArch: BPF: Sign-extend return values")
we also sign extended a5 to the a0 register (return value in LoongArch).
For function call insn, we later propagate the a0 register back to a5
register. This is right for native calls but wrong for bpf2bpf calls
which expect zero-extended return value in a5 register. So only move a0
to a5 for native calls (i.e. non-BPF_PSEUDO_CALL).(CVE-2025-22048)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
spufs: fix gang directory lifetimes
prior to "[POWERPC] spufs: Fix gang destroy leaks" we used to have a problem with gang lifetimes - creation of a gang returns opened gang directory, which normally gets removed when that gets closed, but if somebody has created a context belonging to that gang and kept it alive until the gang got closed, removal failed and we ended up with a leak.
Unfortunately, it had been fixed the wrong way. Dentry of gang directory was no longer pinned, and rmdir on close was gone. One problem was that failure of open kept calling simple_rmdir() as cleanup, which meant an unbalanced dput(). Another bug was in the success case - gang creation incremented link count on root directory, but that was no longer undone when gang got destroyed.
Fix consists of * reverting the commit in question * adding a counter to gang, protected by ->i_rwsem of gang directory inode. * having it set to 1 at creation time, dropped in both spufs_dir_close() and spufs_gang_close() and bumped in spufs_create_context(), provided that it's not 0. * using simple_recursive_removal() to take the gang directory out when counter reaches zero.(CVE-2025-22072)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI: brcmstb: Fix error path after a call to regulator_bulk_get()
If the regulator_bulk_get() returns an error and no regulators are created, we need to set their number to zero.
If we don't do this and the PCIe link up fails, a call to the regulator_bulk_free() will result in a kernel panic.
While at it, print the error value, as we cannot return an error upwards as the kernel will WARN() on an error from add_bus().
kwilczynski: commit log, use comma in the message to match style with other similar messages
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: avoid journaling sb update on error if journal is destroying
Presently we always BUG_ON if trying to start a transaction on a journal marked with JBD2_UNMOUNT, since this should never happen. However, while ltp running stress tests, it was observed that in case of some error handling paths, it is possible for update_super_work to start a transaction after the journal is destroyed eg:
(umount) ext4_kill_sb kill_block_super generic_shutdown_super sync_filesystem / commits all txns / evict_inodes / might start a new txn / ext4_put_super flush_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work) / flush the workqueue / jbd2_journal_destroy journal_kill_thread journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT; jbd2_journal_commit_transaction jbd2_journal_get_descriptor_buffer jbd2_journal_bmap ext4_journal_bmap ext4_map_blocks ... ext4_inode_error ext4_handle_error schedule_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work)
/* work queue kicks in */
update_super_work
jbd2_journal_start
start_this_handle
BUG_ON(journal->j_flags &
JBD2_UNMOUNT)
Hence, introduce a new mount flag to indicate journal is destroying and only do a journaled (and deferred) update of sb if this flag is not set. Otherwise, just fallback to an un-journaled commit.
Further, in the journal destroy path, we have the following sequence:
- Set mount flag indicating journal is destroying
- force a commit and wait for it
- flush pending sb updates
This sequence is important as it ensures that, after this point, there is no sb update that might be journaled so it is safe to update the sb outside the journal. (To avoid race discussed in 2d01ddc86606)
Also, we don't need a similar check in ext4_grp_locked_error since it is only called from mballoc and AFAICT it would be always valid to schedule work here.(CVE-2025-22113)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: fix out-of-bound read in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all()
There's issue as follows: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88807b003000 by task syz-executor.0/15172
CPU: 3 PID: 15172 Comm: syz-executor.0 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:82 [inline] dump_stack+0xbe/0xfd lib/dump_stack.c:123 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1e/0x280 mm/kasan/report.c:400 __kasan_report.cold+0x6c/0x84 mm/kasan/report.c:560 kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 mm/kasan/report.c:585 ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790 fs/ext4/xattr.c:1137 ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0x4c7/0xda0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2896 ext4_evict_inode+0xb3b/0x1670 fs/ext4/inode.c:323 evict+0x39f/0x880 fs/inode.c:622 iput_final fs/inode.c:1746 [inline] iput fs/inode.c:1772 [inline] iput+0x525/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:1758 ext4_orphan_cleanup fs/ext4/super.c:3298 [inline] ext4_fill_super+0x8c57/0xba40 fs/ext4/super.c:5300 mount_bdev+0x355/0x410 fs/super.c:1446 legacy_get_tree+0xfe/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:611 vfs_get_tree+0x8d/0x2f0 fs/super.c:1576 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2983 [inline] path_mount+0x119a/0x1ad0 fs/namespace.c:3316 do_mount+0xfc/0x110 fs/namespace.c:3329 __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3540 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x219/0x2e0 fs/namespace.c:3514 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0xd1
Memory state around the buggy address: ffff88807b002f00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff88807b002f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >ffff88807b003000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ^ ffff88807b003080: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ffff88807b003100: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
Above issue happens as ext4_xattr_delete_inode() isn't check xattr is valid if xattr is in inode. To solve above issue call xattr_check_inode() check if xattr if valid in inode. In fact, we can directly verify in ext4_iget_extra_inode(), so that there is no divergent verification.(CVE-2025-22121)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md/raid1,raid10: don't ignore IO flags
If blk-wbt is enabled by default, it's found that raid write performance is quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks, due to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist since blk-wbt is introduced.
Other than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, for example REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priority reverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, because io will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.
Fix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.
Fises: f51d46d0e7cb ("md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT")(CVE-2025-22125)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
LoongArch: BPF: Fix off-by-one error in build_prologue()
Vincent reported that running BPF progs with tailcalls on LoongArch causes kernel hard lockup. Debugging the issues shows that the JITed image missing a jirl instruction at the end of the epilogue.
There are two passes in JIT compiling, the first pass set the flags and the second pass generates JIT code based on those flags. With BPF progs mixing bpf2bpf and tailcalls, build_prologue() generates N insns in the first pass and then generates N+1 insns in the second pass. This makes epilogue_offset off by one and we will jump to some unexpected insn and cause lockup. Fix this by inserting a nop insn.(CVE-2025-37893)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-89.0.0.94.oe2403sp1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removal\n\nBefore 456d8aa37d0f (\u0026quot;PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal to\navoid use-after-free\u0026quot;), we would free the ASPM link only after the last\nfunction on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.\n\nThat was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,\nlink-\u0026gt;downstream would point to free\u0026apos;d memory after.\n\nAfter above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any function\nremoval on the bus pertaining to a given link.\n\nThat is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstream\nport, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link which\nstill remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.\n\nThe resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, because\npciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.\n\nOn that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.\nFree exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link is\nobsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.\n\n[kwilczynski: commit log](CVE-2024-58093)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\njfs: add check read-only before truncation in jfs_truncate_nolock()\n\nAdded a check for \u0026quot;read-only\u0026quot; mode in the `jfs_truncate_nolock`\nfunction to avoid errors related to writing to a read-only\nfilesystem.\n\nCall stack:\n\nblock_write_begin() {\n jfs_write_failed() {\n jfs_truncate() {\n jfs_truncate_nolock() {\n txEnd() {\n ...\n log = JFS_SBI(tblk-\u0026gt;sb)-\u0026gt;log;\n // (log == NULL)\n\nIf the `isReadOnly(ip)` condition is triggered in\n`jfs_truncate_nolock`, the function execution will stop, and no\nfurther data modification will occur. Instead, the `xtTruncate`\nfunction will be called with the \u0026quot;COMMIT_WMAP\u0026quot; flag, preventing\nmodifications in \u0026quot;read-only\u0026quot; mode.(CVE-2024-58094)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrds: sysctl: rds_tcp_{rcv,snd}buf: avoid using current-\u0026gt;nsproxy\n\nAs mentioned in a previous commit of this series, using the \u0026apos;net\u0026apos;\nstructure via \u0026apos;current\u0026apos; is not recommended for different reasons:\n\n- Inconsistency: getting info from the reader\u0026apos;s/writer\u0026apos;s netns vs only\n from the opener\u0026apos;s netns.\n\n- current-\u0026gt;nsproxy can be NULL in some cases, resulting in an \u0026apos;Oops\u0026apos;\n (null-ptr-deref), e.g. when the current task is exiting, as spotted by\n syzbot [1] using acct(2).\n\nThe per-netns structure can be obtained from the table-\u0026gt;data using\ncontainer_of(), then the \u0026apos;net\u0026apos; one can be retrieved from the listen\nsocket (if available).(CVE-2025-21635)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nHID: appleir: Fix potential NULL dereference at raw event handle\n\nSyzkaller reports a NULL pointer dereference issue in input_event().\n\nBUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:68 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in is_event_supported drivers/input/input.c:67 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in input_event+0x42/0xa0 drivers/input/input.c:395\nRead of size 8 at addr 0000000000000028 by task syz-executor199/2949\n\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2949 Comm: syz-executor199 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-syzkaller-00076-gf097a36ef88d #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120\n kasan_report+0xd9/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:602\n check_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:183 [inline]\n kasan_check_range+0xef/0x1a0 mm/kasan/generic.c:189\n instrument_atomic_read include/linux/instrumented.h:68 [inline]\n _test_bit include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 [inline]\n is_event_supported drivers/input/input.c:67 [inline]\n input_event+0x42/0xa0 drivers/input/input.c:395\n input_report_key include/linux/input.h:439 [inline]\n key_down drivers/hid/hid-appleir.c:159 [inline]\n appleir_raw_event+0x3e5/0x5e0 drivers/hid/hid-appleir.c:232\n __hid_input_report.constprop.0+0x312/0x440 drivers/hid/hid-core.c:2111\n hid_ctrl+0x49f/0x550 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:484\n __usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x389/0x6e0 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1650\n usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x396/0x450 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1734\n dummy_timer+0x17f7/0x3960 drivers/usb/gadget/udc/dummy_hcd.c:1993\n __run_hrtimer kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1739 [inline]\n __hrtimer_run_queues+0x20a/0xae0 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1803\n hrtimer_run_softirq+0x17d/0x350 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1820\n handle_softirqs+0x206/0x8d0 kernel/softirq.c:561\n __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:595 [inline]\n invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:435 [inline]\n __irq_exit_rcu+0xfa/0x160 kernel/softirq.c:662\n irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:678\n instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 [inline]\n sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x90/0xb0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:702\n __mod_timer+0x8f6/0xdc0 kernel/time/timer.c:1185\n add_timer+0x62/0x90 kernel/time/timer.c:1295\n schedule_timeout+0x11f/0x280 kernel/time/sleep_timeout.c:98\n usbhid_wait_io+0x1c7/0x380 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:645\n usbhid_init_reports+0x19f/0x390 drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:784\n hiddev_ioctl+0x1133/0x15b0 drivers/hid/usbhid/hiddev.c:794\n vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:892 [inline]\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x190/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:892\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\nThis happens due to the malformed report items sent by the emulated device\nwhich results in a report, that has no fields, being added to the report list.\nDue to this appleir_input_configured() is never called, hidinput_connect()\nfails which results in the HID_CLAIMED_INPUT flag is not being set. However,\nit does not make appleir_probe() fail and lets the event callback to be\ncalled without the associated input device.\n\nThus, add a check for the HID_CLAIMED_INPUT flag and leave the event hook\nearly if the driver didn\u0026apos;t claim any input_dev for some reason. Moreover,\nsome other hid drivers accessing input_dev in their event callbacks do have\nsimilar checks, too.\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2025-21948)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: qla1280: Fix kernel oops when debug level \u0026gt; 2\n\nA null dereference or oops exception will eventually occur when qla1280.c\ndriver is compiled with DEBUG_QLA1280 enabled and ql_debug_level \u0026gt; 2. I\nthink its clear from the code that the intention here is sg_dma_len(s) not\nlength of sg_next(s) when printing the debug info.(CVE-2025-21957)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: cfg80211: cancel wiphy_work before freeing wiphy\n\nA wiphy_work can be queued from the moment the wiphy is allocated and\ninitialized (i.e. wiphy_new_nm). When a wiphy_work is queued, the\nrdev::wiphy_work is getting queued.\n\nIf wiphy_free is called before the rdev::wiphy_work had a chance to run,\nthe wiphy memory will be freed, and then when it eventally gets to run\nit\u0026apos;ll use invalid memory.\n\nFix this by canceling the work before freeing the wiphy.(CVE-2025-21979)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nRDMA/hns: Fix soft lockup during bt pages loop\n\nDriver runs a for-loop when allocating bt pages and mapping them with\nbuffer pages. When a large buffer (e.g. MR over 100GB) is being allocated,\nit may require a considerable loop count. This will lead to soft lockup:\n\n watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#27 stuck for 22s!\n ...\n Call trace:\n hem_list_alloc_mid_bt+0x124/0x394 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_hem_list_request+0xf8/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_mtr_create+0x2e4/0x360 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n alloc_mr_pbl+0xd4/0x17c [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0xf8/0x190 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x118/0x290\n\n watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 23s!\n ...\n Call trace:\n hns_roce_hem_list_find_mtt+0x7c/0xb0 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n mtr_map_bufs+0xc4/0x204 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_mtr_create+0x31c/0x3c4 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n alloc_mr_pbl+0xb0/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n hns_roce_reg_user_mr+0x108/0x1c0 [hns_roce_hw_v2]\n ib_uverbs_reg_mr+0x120/0x2bc\n\nAdd a cond_resched() to fix soft lockup during these loops. In order not\nto affect the allocation performance of normal-size buffer, set the loop\ncount of a 100GB MR as the threshold to call cond_resched().(CVE-2025-22010)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsoc: qcom: pdr: Fix the potential deadlock\n\nWhen some client process A call pdr_add_lookup() to add the look up for\nthe service and does schedule locator work, later a process B got a new\nserver packet indicating locator is up and call pdr_locator_new_server()\nwhich eventually sets pdr-\u0026gt;locator_init_complete to true which process A\nsees and takes list lock and queries domain list but it will timeout due\nto deadlock as the response will queued to the same qmi-\u0026gt;wq and it is\nordered workqueue and process B is not able to complete new server\nrequest work due to deadlock on list lock.\n\nFix it by removing the unnecessary list iteration as the list iteration\nis already being done inside locator work, so avoid it here and just\ncall schedule_work() here.\n\n Process A Process B\n\n process_scheduled_works()\npdr_add_lookup() qmi_data_ready_work()\n process_scheduled_works() pdr_locator_new_server()\n pdr-\u0026gt;locator_init_complete=true;\n pdr_locator_work()\n mutex_lock(\u0026amp;pdr-\u0026gt;list_lock);\n\n pdr_locate_service() mutex_lock(\u0026amp;pdr-\u0026gt;list_lock);\n\n pdr_get_domain_list()\n pr_err(\u0026quot;PDR: %s get domain list\n txn wait failed: %d\\n\u0026quot;,\n req-\u0026gt;service_name,\n ret);\n\nTimeout error log due to deadlock:\n\n\u0026quot;\n PDR: tms/servreg get domain list txn wait failed: -110\n PDR: service lookup for msm/adsp/sensor_pd:tms/servreg failed: -110\n\u0026quot;\n\nThanks to Bjorn and Johan for letting me know that this commit also fixes\nan audio regression when using the in-kernel pd-mapper as that makes it\neasier to hit this race. [1](CVE-2025-22014)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/migrate: fix shmem xarray update during migration\n\nA shmem folio can be either in page cache or in swap cache, but not at the\nsame time. Namely, once it is in swap cache, folio-\u0026gt;mapping should be\nNULL, and the folio is no longer in a shmem mapping.\n\nIn __folio_migrate_mapping(), to determine the number of xarray entries to\nupdate, folio_test_swapbacked() is used, but that conflates shmem in page\ncache case and shmem in swap cache case. It leads to xarray multi-index\nentry corruption, since it turns a sibling entry to a normal entry during\nxas_store() (see [1] for a userspace reproduction). Fix it by only using\nfolio_test_swapcache() to determine whether xarray is storing swap cache\nentries or not to choose the right number of xarray entries to update.\n\n[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Z8idPCkaJW1IChjT@casper.infradead.org/\n\nNote:\nIn __split_huge_page(), folio_test_anon() \u0026amp;\u0026amp; folio_test_swapcache() is\nused to get swap_cache address space, but that ignores the shmem folio in\nswap cache case. It could lead to NULL pointer dereferencing when a\nin-swap-cache shmem folio is split at __xa_store(), since\n!folio_test_anon() is true and folio-\u0026gt;mapping is NULL. But fortunately,\nits caller split_huge_page_to_list_to_order() bails out early with EBUSY\nwhen folio-\u0026gt;mapping is NULL. So no need to take care of it here.(CVE-2025-22015)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: streamzap: fix race between device disconnection and urb callback\n\nSyzkaller has reported a general protection fault at function\nir_raw_event_store_with_filter(). This crash is caused by a NULL pointer\ndereference of dev-\u0026gt;raw pointer, even though it is checked for NULL in\nthe same function, which means there is a race condition. It occurs due\nto the incorrect order of actions in the streamzap_disconnect() function:\nrc_unregister_device() is called before usb_kill_urb(). The dev-\u0026gt;raw\npointer is freed and set to NULL in rc_unregister_device(), and only\nafter that usb_kill_urb() waits for in-progress requests to finish.\n\nIf rc_unregister_device() is called while streamzap_callback() handler is\nnot finished, this can lead to accessing freed resources. Thus\nrc_unregister_device() should be called after usb_kill_urb().\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.(CVE-2025-22027)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nksmbd: fix session use-after-free in multichannel connection\n\nThere is a race condition between session setup and\nksmbd_sessions_deregister. The session can be freed before the connection\nis added to channel list of session.\nThis patch check reference count of session before freeing it.(CVE-2025-22040)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nksmbd: fix use-after-free in ksmbd_sessions_deregister()\n\nIn multichannel mode, UAF issue can occur in session_deregister\nwhen the second channel sets up a session through the connection of\nthe first channel. session that is freed through the global session\ntable can be accessed again through -\u0026gt;sessions of connection.(CVE-2025-22041)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nacpi: nfit: fix narrowing conversion in acpi_nfit_ctl\n\nSyzkaller has reported a warning in to_nfit_bus_uuid(): \u0026quot;only secondary\nbus families can be translated\u0026quot;. This warning is emited if the argument\nis equal to NVDIMM_BUS_FAMILY_NFIT == 0. Function acpi_nfit_ctl() first\nverifies that a user-provided value call_pkg-\u0026gt;nd_family of type u64 is\nnot equal to 0. Then the value is converted to int, and only after that\nis compared to NVDIMM_BUS_FAMILY_MAX. This can lead to passing an invalid\nargument to acpi_nfit_ctl(), if call_pkg-\u0026gt;nd_family is non-zero, while\nthe lower 32 bits are zero.\n\nFurthermore, it is best to return EINVAL immediately upon seeing the\ninvalid user input. The WARNING is insufficient to prevent further\nundefined behavior based on other invalid user input.\n\nAll checks of the input value should be applied to the original variable\ncall_pkg-\u0026gt;nd_family.\n\n[iweiny: update commit message](CVE-2025-22044)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nx86/mm: Fix flush_tlb_range() when used for zapping normal PMDs\n\nOn the following path, flush_tlb_range() can be used for zapping normal\nPMD entries (PMD entries that point to page tables) together with the PTE\nentries in the pointed-to page table:\n\n collapse_pte_mapped_thp\n pmdp_collapse_flush\n flush_tlb_range\n\nThe arm64 version of flush_tlb_range() has a comment describing that it can\nbe used for page table removal, and does not use any last-level\ninvalidation optimizations. Fix the X86 version by making it behave the\nsame way.\n\nCurrently, X86 only uses this information for the following two purposes,\nwhich I think means the issue doesn\u0026apos;t have much impact:\n\n - In native_flush_tlb_multi() for checking if lazy TLB CPUs need to be\n IPI\u0026apos;d to avoid issues with speculative page table walks.\n - In Hyper-V TLB paravirtualization, again for lazy TLB stuff.\n\nThe patch \u0026quot;x86/mm: only invalidate final translations with INVLPGB\u0026quot; which\nis currently under review (see\n\u0026lt;https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241230175550.4046587-13-riel@surriel.com/\u0026gt;)\nwould probably be making the impact of this a lot worse.(CVE-2025-22045)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nLoongArch: BPF: Don\u0026apos;t override subprog\u0026apos;s return value\n\nThe verifier test `calls: div by 0 in subprog` triggers a panic at the\nld.bu instruction. The ld.bu insn is trying to load byte from memory\naddress returned by the subprog. The subprog actually set the correct\naddress at the a5 register (dedicated register for BPF return values).\nBut at commit 73c359d1d356 (\u0026quot;LoongArch: BPF: Sign-extend return values\u0026quot;)\nwe also sign extended a5 to the a0 register (return value in LoongArch).\nFor function call insn, we later propagate the a0 register back to a5\nregister. This is right for native calls but wrong for bpf2bpf calls\nwhich expect zero-extended return value in a5 register. So only move a0\nto a5 for native calls (i.e. non-BPF_PSEUDO_CALL).(CVE-2025-22048)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nspufs: fix gang directory lifetimes\n\nprior to \u0026quot;[POWERPC] spufs: Fix gang destroy leaks\u0026quot; we used to have\na problem with gang lifetimes - creation of a gang returns opened\ngang directory, which normally gets removed when that gets closed,\nbut if somebody has created a context belonging to that gang and\nkept it alive until the gang got closed, removal failed and we\nended up with a leak.\n\nUnfortunately, it had been fixed the wrong way. Dentry of gang\ndirectory was no longer pinned, and rmdir on close was gone.\nOne problem was that failure of open kept calling simple_rmdir()\nas cleanup, which meant an unbalanced dput(). Another bug was\nin the success case - gang creation incremented link count on\nroot directory, but that was no longer undone when gang got\ndestroyed.\n\nFix consists of\n\t* reverting the commit in question\n\t* adding a counter to gang, protected by -\u0026gt;i_rwsem\nof gang directory inode.\n\t* having it set to 1 at creation time, dropped\nin both spufs_dir_close() and spufs_gang_close() and bumped\nin spufs_create_context(), provided that it\u0026apos;s not 0.\n\t* using simple_recursive_removal() to take the gang\ndirectory out when counter reaches zero.(CVE-2025-22072)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI: brcmstb: Fix error path after a call to regulator_bulk_get()\n\nIf the regulator_bulk_get() returns an error and no regulators\nare created, we need to set their number to zero.\n\nIf we don\u0026apos;t do this and the PCIe link up fails, a call to the\nregulator_bulk_free() will result in a kernel panic.\n\nWhile at it, print the error value, as we cannot return an error\nupwards as the kernel will WARN() on an error from add_bus().\n\n[kwilczynski: commit log, use comma in the message to match style with\nother similar messages](CVE-2025-22095)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: avoid journaling sb update on error if journal is destroying\n\nPresently we always BUG_ON if trying to start a transaction on a journal marked\nwith JBD2_UNMOUNT, since this should never happen. However, while ltp running\nstress tests, it was observed that in case of some error handling paths, it is\npossible for update_super_work to start a transaction after the journal is\ndestroyed eg:\n\n(umount)\next4_kill_sb\n kill_block_super\n generic_shutdown_super\n sync_filesystem /* commits all txns */\n evict_inodes\n /* might start a new txn */\n ext4_put_super\n\tflush_work(\u0026amp;sbi-\u0026gt;s_sb_upd_work) /* flush the workqueue */\n jbd2_journal_destroy\n journal_kill_thread\n journal-\u0026gt;j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;\n jbd2_journal_commit_transaction\n jbd2_journal_get_descriptor_buffer\n jbd2_journal_bmap\n ext4_journal_bmap\n ext4_map_blocks\n ...\n ext4_inode_error\n ext4_handle_error\n schedule_work(\u0026amp;sbi-\u0026gt;s_sb_upd_work)\n\n /* work queue kicks in */\n update_super_work\n jbd2_journal_start\n start_this_handle\n BUG_ON(journal-\u0026gt;j_flags \u0026amp;\n JBD2_UNMOUNT)\n\nHence, introduce a new mount flag to indicate journal is destroying and only do\na journaled (and deferred) update of sb if this flag is not set. Otherwise, just\nfallback to an un-journaled commit.\n\nFurther, in the journal destroy path, we have the following sequence:\n\n 1. Set mount flag indicating journal is destroying\n 2. force a commit and wait for it\n 3. flush pending sb updates\n\nThis sequence is important as it ensures that, after this point, there is no sb\nupdate that might be journaled so it is safe to update the sb outside the\njournal. (To avoid race discussed in 2d01ddc86606)\n\nAlso, we don\u0026apos;t need a similar check in ext4_grp_locked_error since it is only\ncalled from mballoc and AFAICT it would be always valid to schedule work here.(CVE-2025-22113)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: fix out-of-bound read in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all()\n\nThere\u0026apos;s issue as follows:\nBUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff88807b003000 by task syz-executor.0/15172\n\nCPU: 3 PID: 15172 Comm: syz-executor.0\nCall Trace:\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:82 [inline]\n dump_stack+0xbe/0xfd lib/dump_stack.c:123\n print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1e/0x280 mm/kasan/report.c:400\n __kasan_report.cold+0x6c/0x84 mm/kasan/report.c:560\n kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 mm/kasan/report.c:585\n ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x6ff/0x790 fs/ext4/xattr.c:1137\n ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0x4c7/0xda0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2896\n ext4_evict_inode+0xb3b/0x1670 fs/ext4/inode.c:323\n evict+0x39f/0x880 fs/inode.c:622\n iput_final fs/inode.c:1746 [inline]\n iput fs/inode.c:1772 [inline]\n iput+0x525/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:1758\n ext4_orphan_cleanup fs/ext4/super.c:3298 [inline]\n ext4_fill_super+0x8c57/0xba40 fs/ext4/super.c:5300\n mount_bdev+0x355/0x410 fs/super.c:1446\n legacy_get_tree+0xfe/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:611\n vfs_get_tree+0x8d/0x2f0 fs/super.c:1576\n do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2983 [inline]\n path_mount+0x119a/0x1ad0 fs/namespace.c:3316\n do_mount+0xfc/0x110 fs/namespace.c:3329\n __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3540 [inline]\n __se_sys_mount+0x219/0x2e0 fs/namespace.c:3514\n do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0xd1\n\nMemory state around the buggy address:\n ffff88807b002f00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n ffff88807b002f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n\u0026gt;ffff88807b003000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff\n ^\n ffff88807b003080: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff\n ffff88807b003100: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff\n\nAbove issue happens as ext4_xattr_delete_inode() isn\u0026apos;t check xattr\nis valid if xattr is in inode.\nTo solve above issue call xattr_check_inode() check if xattr if valid\nin inode. In fact, we can directly verify in ext4_iget_extra_inode(),\nso that there is no divergent verification.(CVE-2025-22121)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmd/raid1,raid10: don\u0026apos;t ignore IO flags\n\nIf blk-wbt is enabled by default, it\u0026apos;s found that raid write performance\nis quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks,\ndue to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist since\nblk-wbt is introduced.\n\nOther than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, for\nexample REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priority\nreverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, because\nio will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.\n\nFix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.\n\nFises: f51d46d0e7cb (\u0026quot;md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT\u0026quot;)(CVE-2025-22125)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nLoongArch: BPF: Fix off-by-one error in build_prologue()\n\nVincent reported that running BPF progs with tailcalls on LoongArch\ncauses kernel hard lockup. Debugging the issues shows that the JITed\nimage missing a jirl instruction at the end of the epilogue.\n\nThere are two passes in JIT compiling, the first pass set the flags and\nthe second pass generates JIT code based on those flags. With BPF progs\nmixing bpf2bpf and tailcalls, build_prologue() generates N insns in the\nfirst pass and then generates N+1 insns in the second pass. This makes\nepilogue_offset off by one and we will jump to some unexpected insn and\ncause lockup. Fix this by inserting a nop insn.(CVE-2025-37893)",
"id": "OESA-2025-1464",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:08:33Z",
"published": "2025-05-09T11:08:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-1464"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58093"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58094"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21635"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21948"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21957"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21979"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22010"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22014"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22015"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22027"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22040"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22041"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22044"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22045"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22048"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22072"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22095"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22113"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22121"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22125"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37893"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2024-58093",
"CVE-2024-58094",
"CVE-2025-21635",
"CVE-2025-21948",
"CVE-2025-21957",
"CVE-2025-21979",
"CVE-2025-22010",
"CVE-2025-22014",
"CVE-2025-22015",
"CVE-2025-22027",
"CVE-2025-22040",
"CVE-2025-22041",
"CVE-2025-22044",
"CVE-2025-22045",
"CVE-2025-22048",
"CVE-2025-22072",
"CVE-2025-22095",
"CVE-2025-22113",
"CVE-2025-22121",
"CVE-2025-22125",
"CVE-2025-37893"
]
}
OESA-2025-1465 (CVE-2020-36789)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2025-05-09 11:08 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:08 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
can: dev: can_get_echo_skb(): prevent call to kfree_skb() in hard IRQ context
If a driver calls can_get_echo_skb() during a hardware IRQ (which is often, but not always, the case), the 'WARN_ON(in_irq)' in net/core/skbuff.c#skb_release_head_state() might be triggered, under network congestion circumstances, together with the potential risk of a NULL pointer dereference.
The root cause of this issue is the call to kfree_skb() instead of dev_kfree_skb_irq() in net/core/dev.c#enqueue_to_backlog().
This patch prevents the skb to be freed within the call to netif_rx() by incrementing its reference count with skb_get(). The skb is finally freed by one of the in-irq-context safe functions: dev_consume_skb_any() or dev_kfree_skb_any(). The "any" version is used because some drivers might call can_get_echo_skb() in a normal context.
The reason for this issue to occur is that initially, in the core network stack, loopback skb were not supposed to be received in hardware IRQ context. The CAN stack is an exeption.
This bug was previously reported back in 2017 in [1] but the proposed patch never got accepted.
While [1] directly modifies net/core/dev.c, we try to propose here a smoother modification local to CAN network stack (the assumption behind is that only CAN devices are affected by this issue).
[1] http://lore.kernel.org/r/57a3ffb6-3309-3ad5-5a34-e93c3fe3614d@cetitec.com(CVE-2020-36789)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
video: fbdev: cirrusfb: check pixclock to avoid divide by zero
Do a sanity check on pixclock value to avoid divide by zero.
If the pixclock value is zero, the cirrusfb driver will round up pixclock to get the derived frequency as close to maxclock as possible.
Syzkaller reported a divide error in cirrusfb_check_pixclock.
divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 0 PID: 14938 Comm: cirrusfb_test Not tainted 5.15.0-rc6 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2 RIP: 0010:cirrusfb_check_var+0x6f1/0x1260
Call Trace: fb_set_var+0x398/0xf90 do_fb_ioctl+0x4b8/0x6f0 fb_ioctl+0xeb/0x130 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x19d/0x220 do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae(CVE-2021-47641)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
can: dev: can_restart: fix use after free bug
After calling netif_rx_ni(skb), dereferencing skb is unsafe. Especially, the can_frame cf which aliases skb memory is accessed after the netif_rx_ni() in: stats->rx_bytes += cf->len;
Reordering the lines solves the issue.(CVE-2021-47668)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
can: peak_usb: fix use after free bugs
After calling peak_usb_netif_rx_ni(skb), dereferencing skb is unsafe. Especially, the can_frame cf which aliases skb memory is accessed after the peak_usb_netif_rx_ni().
Reordering the lines solves the issue.(CVE-2021-47670)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
qede: confirm skb is allocated before using
qede_build_skb() assumes build_skb() always works and goes straight to skb_reserve(). However, build_skb() can fail under memory pressure. This results in a kernel panic because the skb to reserve is NULL.
Add a check in case build_skb() failed to allocate and return NULL.
The NULL return is handled correctly in callers to qede_build_skb().(CVE-2022-49084)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: openvswitch: fix leak of nested actions
While parsing user-provided actions, openvswitch module may dynamically allocate memory and store pointers in the internal copy of the actions. So this memory has to be freed while destroying the actions.
Currently there are only two such actions: ct() and set(). However, there are many actions that can hold nested lists of actions and ovs_nla_free_flow_actions() just jumps over them leaking the memory.
For example, removal of the flow with the following actions will lead to a leak of the memory allocated by nf_ct_tmpl_alloc():
actions:clone(ct(commit),0)
Non-freed set() action may also leak the 'dst' structure for the tunnel info including device references.
Under certain conditions with a high rate of flow rotation that may cause significant memory leak problem (2MB per second in reporter's case). The problem is also hard to mitigate, because the user doesn't have direct control over the datapath flows generated by OVS.
Fix that by iterating over all the nested actions and freeing everything that needs to be freed recursively.
New build time assertion should protect us from this problem if new actions will be added in the future.
Unfortunately, openvswitch module doesn't use NLA_F_NESTED, so all attributes has to be explicitly checked. sample() and clone() actions are mixing extra attributes into the user-provided action list. That prevents some code generalization too.(CVE-2022-49086)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: pm8001: Fix abort all task initialization
In pm80xx_send_abort_all(), the n_elem field of the ccb used is not initialized to 0. This missing initialization sometimes lead to the task completion path seeing the ccb with a non-zero n_elem resulting in the execution of invalid dma_unmap_sg() calls in pm8001_ccb_task_free(), causing a crash such as:
[ 197.676341] RIP: 0010:iommu_dma_unmap_sg+0x6d/0x280 [ 197.700204] RSP: 0018:ffff889bbcf89c88 EFLAGS: 00010012 [ 197.705485] RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff83d0bda0 [ 197.712687] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88810dffc0d0 [ 197.719887] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8881c790098b [ 197.727089] R10: ffffed1038f20131 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 197.734296] R13: ffff88810dffc0d0 R14: 0000000000000010 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 197.741493] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff889bbcf80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 197.749659] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 197.755459] CR2: 00007f16c1b42734 CR3: 0000000004814000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0 [ 197.762656] Call Trace: [ 197.765127] <IRQ> [ 197.767162] pm8001_ccb_task_free+0x5f1/0x820 [pm80xx] [ 197.772364] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x54/0x220 [ 197.776680] pm8001_mpi_task_abort_resp+0x2ce/0x4f0 [pm80xx] [ 197.782406] process_oq+0xe85/0x7890 [pm80xx] [ 197.786817] ? lock_acquire+0x194/0x490 [ 197.790697] ? handle_irq_event+0x10e/0x1b0 [ 197.794920] ? mpi_sata_completion+0x2d70/0x2d70 [pm80xx] [ 197.800378] ? __wake_up_bit+0x100/0x100 [ 197.804340] ? lock_is_held_type+0x98/0x110 [ 197.808565] pm80xx_chip_isr+0x94/0x130 [pm80xx] [ 197.813243] tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0x24b/0x2f0 [ 197.818785] __do_softirq+0x1b5/0x82d [ 197.822485] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x54/0x220 [ 197.826799] __irq_exit_rcu+0x17e/0x1e0 [ 197.830678] irq_exit_rcu+0xa/0x20 [ 197.834114] common_interrupt+0x78/0x90 [ 197.840051] </IRQ> [ 197.844236] <TASK> [ 197.848397] asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40
Avoid this issue by always initializing the ccb n_elem field to 0 in pm8001_send_abort_all(), pm8001_send_read_log() and pm80xx_send_abort_all().(CVE-2022-49217)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in amdgpu_dm_connector_add_common_modes()
In amdgpu_dm_connector_add_common_modes(), amdgpu_dm_create_common_mode() is assigned to mode and is passed to drm_mode_probed_add() directly after that. drm_mode_probed_add() passes &mode->head to list_add_tail(), and there is a dereference of it in list_add_tail() without recoveries, which could lead to NULL pointer dereference on failure of amdgpu_dm_create_common_mode().
Fix this by adding a NULL check of mode.
This bug was found by a static analyzer.
Builds with 'make allyesconfig' show no new warnings, and our static analyzer no longer warns about this code.(CVE-2022-49232)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
staging: rtl8712: fix uninit-value in r871xu_drv_init()
When 'tmpU1b' returns from r8712_read8(padapter, EE_9346CR) is 0, 'mac[6]' will not be initialized.
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in r871xu_drv_init+0x2d54/0x3070 drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_intf.c:541 r871xu_drv_init+0x2d54/0x3070 drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_intf.c:541 usb_probe_interface+0xf19/0x1600 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:396 really_probe+0x653/0x14b0 drivers/base/dd.c:596 __driver_probe_device+0x3e9/0x530 drivers/base/dd.c:752 driver_probe_device drivers/base/dd.c:782 [inline] __device_attach_driver+0x79f/0x1120 drivers/base/dd.c:899 bus_for_each_drv+0x2d6/0x3f0 drivers/base/bus.c:427 __device_attach+0x593/0x8e0 drivers/base/dd.c:970 device_initial_probe+0x4a/0x60 drivers/base/dd.c:1017 bus_probe_device+0x17b/0x3e0 drivers/base/bus.c:487 device_add+0x1fff/0x26e0 drivers/base/core.c:3405 usb_set_configuration+0x37e9/0x3ed0 drivers/usb/core/message.c:2170 usb_generic_driver_probe+0x13c/0x300 drivers/usb/core/generic.c:238 usb_probe_device+0x309/0x570 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:293 really_probe+0x653/0x14b0 drivers/base/dd.c:596 __driver_probe_device+0x3e9/0x530 drivers/base/dd.c:752 driver_probe_device drivers/base/dd.c:782 [inline] __device_attach_driver+0x79f/0x1120 drivers/base/dd.c:899 bus_for_each_drv+0x2d6/0x3f0 drivers/base/bus.c:427 __device_attach+0x593/0x8e0 drivers/base/dd.c:970 device_initial_probe+0x4a/0x60 drivers/base/dd.c:1017 bus_probe_device+0x17b/0x3e0 drivers/base/bus.c:487 device_add+0x1fff/0x26e0 drivers/base/core.c:3405 usb_new_device+0x1b8e/0x2950 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:2566 hub_port_connect drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5358 [inline] hub_port_connect_change drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5502 [inline] port_event drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5660 [inline] hub_event+0x58e3/0x89e0 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5742 process_one_work+0xdb6/0x1820 kernel/workqueue.c:2307 worker_thread+0x10b3/0x21e0 kernel/workqueue.c:2454 kthread+0x3c7/0x500 kernel/kthread.c:377 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
Local variable mac created at: r871xu_drv_init+0x1771/0x3070 drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_intf.c:394 usb_probe_interface+0xf19/0x1600 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:396
KMSAN: uninit-value in r871xu_drv_init https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=3cd92b1d85428b128503bfa7a250294c9ae00bd8(CVE-2022-49298)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
driver: base: fix UAF when driver_attach failed
When driver_attach(drv); failed, the driver_private will be freed. But it has been added to the bus, which caused a UAF.
To fix it, we need to delete it from the bus when failed.(CVE-2022-49385)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/hfi1: Prevent panic when SDMA is disabled
If the hfi1 module is loaded with HFI1_CAP_SDMA off, a call to hfi1_write_iter() will dereference a NULL pointer and panic. A typical stack frame is:
sdma_select_user_engine [hfi1] hfi1_user_sdma_process_request [hfi1] hfi1_write_iter [hfi1] do_iter_readv_writev do_iter_write vfs_writev do_writev do_syscall_64
The fix is to test for SDMA in hfi1_write_iter() and fail the I/O with EINVAL.(CVE-2022-49429)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sfc: fix use after free when disabling sriov
Use after free is detected by kfence when disabling sriov. What was read after being freed was vf->pci_dev: it was freed from pci_disable_sriov and later read in efx_ef10_sriov_free_vf_vports, called from efx_ef10_sriov_free_vf_vswitching.
Set the pointer to NULL at release time to not trying to read it later.
Reproducer and dmesg log (note that kfence doesn't detect it every time): $ echo 1 > /sys/class/net/enp65s0f0np0/device/sriov_numvfs $ echo 0 > /sys/class/net/enp65s0f0np0/device/sriov_numvfs
BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free read in efx_ef10_sriov_free_vf_vswitching+0x82/0x170 [sfc]
Use-after-free read at 0x00000000ff3c1ba5 (in kfence-#224): efx_ef10_sriov_free_vf_vswitching+0x82/0x170 [sfc] efx_ef10_pci_sriov_disable+0x38/0x70 [sfc] efx_pci_sriov_configure+0x24/0x40 [sfc] sriov_numvfs_store+0xfe/0x140 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11c/0x1b0 new_sync_write+0x11f/0x1b0 vfs_write+0x1eb/0x280 ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
kfence-#224: 0x00000000edb8ef95-0x00000000671f5ce1, size=2792, cache=kmalloc-4k
allocated by task 6771 on cpu 10 at 3137.860196s: pci_alloc_dev+0x21/0x60 pci_iov_add_virtfn+0x2a2/0x320 sriov_enable+0x212/0x3e0 efx_ef10_sriov_configure+0x67/0x80 [sfc] efx_pci_sriov_configure+0x24/0x40 [sfc] sriov_numvfs_store+0xba/0x140 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11c/0x1b0 new_sync_write+0x11f/0x1b0 vfs_write+0x1eb/0x280 ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
freed by task 6771 on cpu 12 at 3170.991309s: device_release+0x34/0x90 kobject_cleanup+0x3a/0x130 pci_iov_remove_virtfn+0xd9/0x120 sriov_disable+0x30/0xe0 efx_ef10_pci_sriov_disable+0x57/0x70 [sfc] efx_pci_sriov_configure+0x24/0x40 [sfc] sriov_numvfs_store+0xfe/0x140 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11c/0x1b0 new_sync_write+0x11f/0x1b0 vfs_write+0x1eb/0x280 ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae(CVE-2022-49626)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
cgroup: Use separate src/dst nodes when preloading css_sets for migration
Each cset (css_set) is pinned by its tasks. When we're moving tasks around across csets for a migration, we need to hold the source and destination csets to ensure that they don't go away while we're moving tasks about. This is done by linking cset->mg_preload_node on either the mgctx->preloaded_src_csets or mgctx->preloaded_dst_csets list. Using the same cset->mg_preload_node for both the src and dst lists was deemed okay as a cset can't be both the source and destination at the same time.
Unfortunately, this overloading becomes problematic when multiple tasks are involved in a migration and some of them are identity noop migrations while others are actually moving across cgroups. For example, this can happen with the following sequence on cgroup1:
#1> mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/misc/a/b #2> echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/misc/a/cgroup.procs #3> RUN_A_COMMAND_WHICH_CREATES_MULTIPLE_THREADS & #4> PID=$! #5> echo $PID > /sys/fs/cgroup/misc/a/b/tasks #6> echo $PID > /sys/fs/cgroup/misc/a/cgroup.procs
the process including the group leader back into a. In this final migration, non-leader threads would be doing identity migration while the group leader is doing an actual one.
After #3, let's say the whole process was in cset A, and that after #4, the leader moves to cset B. Then, during #6, the following happens:
-
cgroup_migrate_add_src() is called on B for the leader.
-
cgroup_migrate_add_src() is called on A for the other threads.
-
cgroup_migrate_prepare_dst() is called. It scans the src list.
-
It notices that B wants to migrate to A, so it tries to A to the dst list but realizes that its ->mg_preload_node is already busy.
-
and then it notices A wants to migrate to A as it's an identity migration, it culls it by list_del_init()'ing its ->mg_preload_node and putting references accordingly.
-
The rest of migration takes place with B on the src list but nothing on the dst list.
This means that A isn't held while migration is in progress. If all tasks leave A before the migration finishes and the incoming task pins it, the cset will be destroyed leading to use-after-free.
This is caused by overloading cset->mg_preload_node for both src and dst preload lists. We wanted to exclude the cset from the src list but ended up inadvertently excluding it from the dst list too.
This patch fixes the issue by separating out cset->mg_preload_node into ->mg_src_preload_node and ->mg_dst_preload_node, so that the src and dst preloadings don't interfere with each other.(CVE-2022-49647)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/khugepaged: fix ->anon_vma race
If an ->anon_vma is attached to the VMA, collapse_and_free_pmd() requires it to be locked.
Page table traversal is allowed under any one of the mmap lock, the anon_vma lock (if the VMA is associated with an anon_vma), and the mapping lock (if the VMA is associated with a mapping); and so to be able to remove page tables, we must hold all three of them. retract_page_tables() bails out if an ->anon_vma is attached, but does this check before holding the mmap lock (as the comment above the check explains).
If we racily merged an existing ->anon_vma (shared with a child process) from a neighboring VMA, subsequent rmap traversals on pages belonging to the child will be able to see the page tables that we are concurrently removing while assuming that nothing else can access them.
Repeat the ->anon_vma check once we hold the mmap lock to ensure that there really is no concurrent page table access.
Hitting this bug causes a lockdep warning in collapse_and_free_pmd(), in the line "lockdep_assert_held_write(&vma->anon_vma->root->rwsem)". It can also lead to use-after-free access.(CVE-2023-52935)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: mdio: validate parameter addr in mdiobus_get_phy()
The caller may pass any value as addr, what may result in an out-of-bounds access to array mdio_map. One existing case is stmmac_init_phy() that may pass -1 as addr. Therefore validate addr before using it.(CVE-2023-53019)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: nfc: Fix use-after-free in local_cleanup()
Fix a use-after-free that occurs in kfree_skb() called from local_cleanup(). This could happen when killing nfc daemon (e.g. neard) after detaching an nfc device. When detaching an nfc device, local_cleanup() called from nfc_llcp_unregister_device() frees local->rx_pending and decreases local->ref by kref_put() in nfc_llcp_local_put(). In the terminating process, nfc daemon releases all sockets and it leads to decreasing local->ref. After the last release of local->ref, local_cleanup() called from local_release() frees local->rx_pending again, which leads to the bug.
Setting local->rx_pending to NULL in local_cleanup() could prevent use-after-free when local_cleanup() is called twice.
Found by a modified version of syzkaller.
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in kfree_skb()
Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:106) print_address_description.constprop.0.cold (mm/kasan/report.c:306) kasan_check_range (mm/kasan/generic.c:189) kfree_skb (net/core/skbuff.c:955) local_cleanup (net/nfc/llcp_core.c:159) nfc_llcp_local_put.part.0 (net/nfc/llcp_core.c:172) nfc_llcp_local_put (net/nfc/llcp_core.c:181) llcp_sock_destruct (net/nfc/llcp_sock.c:959) __sk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2133) sk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2181) __sk_free (net/core/sock.c:2192) sk_free (net/core/sock.c:2203) llcp_sock_release (net/nfc/llcp_sock.c:646) __sock_release (net/socket.c:650) sock_close (net/socket.c:1365) __fput (fs/file_table.c:306) task_work_run (kernel/task_work.c:179) ptrace_notify (kernel/signal.c:2354) syscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare (kernel/entry/common.c:278) syscall_exit_to_user_mode (kernel/entry/common.c:296) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:86) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:106)
Allocated by task 4719: kasan_save_stack (mm/kasan/common.c:45) __kasan_slab_alloc (mm/kasan/common.c:325) slab_post_alloc_hook (mm/slab.h:766) kmem_cache_alloc_node (mm/slub.c:3497) __alloc_skb (net/core/skbuff.c:552) pn533_recv_response (drivers/nfc/pn533/usb.c:65) __usb_hcd_giveback_urb (drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1671) usb_giveback_urb_bh (drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1704) tasklet_action_common.isra.0 (kernel/softirq.c:797) __do_softirq (kernel/softirq.c:571)
Freed by task 1901: kasan_save_stack (mm/kasan/common.c:45) kasan_set_track (mm/kasan/common.c:52) kasan_save_free_info (mm/kasan/genericdd.c:518) __kasan_slab_free (mm/kasan/common.c:236) kmem_cache_free (mm/slub.c:3809) kfree_skbmem (net/core/skbuff.c:874) kfree_skb (net/core/skbuff.c:931) local_cleanup (net/nfc/llcp_core.c:159) nfc_llcp_unregister_device (net/nfc/llcp_core.c:1617) nfc_unregister_device (net/nfc/core.c:1179) pn53x_unregister_nfc (drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c:2846) pn533_usb_disconnect (drivers/nfc/pn533/usb.c:579) usb_unbind_interface (drivers/usb/core/driver.c:458) device_release_driver_internal (drivers/base/dd.c:1279) bus_remove_device (drivers/base/bus.c:529) device_del (drivers/base/core.c:3665) usb_disable_device (drivers/usb/core/message.c:1420) usb_disconnect (drivers/usb/core.c:2261) hub_event (drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5833) process_one_work (arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:27 include/linux/jump_label.h:212 include/trace/events/workqueue.h:108 kernel/workqueue.c:2281) worker_thread (include/linux/list.h:282 kernel/workqueue.c:2423) kthread (kernel/kthread.c:319) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:301)(CVE-2023-53023)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: ipset: Fix overflow before widen in the bitmap_ip_create() function.
When first_ip is 0, last_ip is 0xFFFFFFFF, and netmask is 31, the value of an arithmetic expression 2 << (netmask - mask_bits - 1) is subject to overflow due to a failure casting operands to a larger data type before performing the arithmetic.
Note that it's harmless since the value will be checked at the next step.
Found by InfoTeCS on behalf of Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2023-53032)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: add check read-only before truncation in jfs_truncate_nolock()
Added a check for "read-only" mode in the jfs_truncate_nolock
function to avoid errors related to writing to a read-only
filesystem.
Call stack:
block_write_begin() { jfs_write_failed() { jfs_truncate() { jfs_truncate_nolock() { txEnd() { ... log = JFS_SBI(tblk->sb)->log; // (log == NULL)
If the isReadOnly(ip) condition is triggered in
jfs_truncate_nolock, the function execution will stop, and no
further data modification will occur. Instead, the xtTruncate
function will be called with the "COMMIT_WMAP" flag, preventing
modifications in "read-only" mode.(CVE-2024-58094)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: mcast: extend RCU protection in igmp6_send()
igmp6_send() can be called without RTNL or RCU being held.
Extend RCU protection so that we can safely fetch the net pointer and avoid a potential UAF.
Note that we no longer can use sock_alloc_send_skb() because ipv6.igmp_sk uses GFP_KERNEL allocations which can sleep.
Instead use alloc_skb() and charge the net->ipv6.igmp_sk socket under RCU protection.(CVE-2025-21759)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ndisc: extend RCU protection in ndisc_send_skb()
ndisc_send_skb() can be called without RTNL or RCU held.
Acquire rcu_read_lock() earlier, so that we can use dev_net_rcu() and avoid a potential UAF.(CVE-2025-21760)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
openvswitch: use RCU protection in ovs_vport_cmd_fill_info()
ovs_vport_cmd_fill_info() can be called without RTNL or RCU.
Use RCU protection and dev_net_rcu() to avoid potential UAF.(CVE-2025-21761)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
arp: use RCU protection in arp_xmit()
arp_xmit() can be called without RTNL or RCU protection.
Use RCU protection to avoid potential UAF.(CVE-2025-21762)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
neighbour: use RCU protection in __neigh_notify()
__neigh_notify() can be called without RTNL or RCU protection.
Use RCU protection to avoid potential UAF.(CVE-2025-21763)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ndisc: use RCU protection in ndisc_alloc_skb()
ndisc_alloc_skb() can be called without RTNL or RCU being held.
Add RCU protection to avoid possible UAF.(CVE-2025-21764)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iscsi_ibft: Fix UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warning in ibft_attr_show_nic()
When performing an iSCSI boot using IPv6, iscsistart still reads the /sys/firmware/ibft/ethernetX/subnet-mask entry. Since the IPv6 prefix length is 64, this causes the shift exponent to become negative, triggering a UBSAN warning. As the concept of a subnet mask does not apply to IPv6, the value is set to ~0 to suppress the warning message.(CVE-2025-21993)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: atm: fix use after free in lec_send()
The ->send() operation frees skb so save the length before calling ->send() to avoid a use after free.(CVE-2025-22004)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tracing: Fix use-after-free in print_graph_function_flags during tracer switching
Kairui reported a UAF issue in print_graph_function_flags() during ftrace stress testing [1]. This issue can be reproduced if puting a 'mdelay(10)' after 'mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock)' in s_start(), and executing the following script:
$ echo function_graph > current_tracer $ cat trace > /dev/null & $ sleep 5 # Ensure the 'cat' reaches the 'mdelay(10)' point $ echo timerlat > current_tracer
The root cause lies in the two calls to print_graph_function_flags within print_trace_line during each s_show():
- One through 'iter->trace->print_line()';
- Another through 'event->funcs->trace()', which is hidden in print_trace_fmt() before print_trace_line returns.
Tracer switching only updates the former, while the latter continues to use the print_line function of the old tracer, which in the script above is print_graph_function_flags.
Moreover, when switching from the 'function_graph' tracer to the 'timerlat' tracer, s_start only calls graph_trace_close of the 'function_graph' tracer to free 'iter->private', but does not set it to NULL. This provides an opportunity for 'event->funcs->trace()' to use an invalid 'iter->private'.
To fix this issue, set 'iter->private' to NULL immediately after freeing it in graph_trace_close(), ensuring that an invalid pointer is not passed to other tracers. Additionally, clean up the unnecessary 'iter->private = NULL' during each 'cat trace' when using wakeup and irqsoff tracers.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231112150030.84609-1-ryncsn@gmail.com/(CVE-2025-22035)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: fix geneve_opt length integer overflow
struct geneve_opt uses 5 bit length for each single option, which means every vary size option should be smaller than 128 bytes.
However, all current related Netlink policies cannot promise this length condition and the attacker can exploit a exact 128-byte size option to fake a zero length option and confuse the parsing logic, further achieve heap out-of-bounds read.
One example crash log is like below:
[ 3.905425] ================================================================== [ 3.905925] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nla_put+0xa9/0xe0 [ 3.906255] Read of size 124 at addr ffff888005f291cc by task poc/177 [ 3.906646] [ 3.906775] CPU: 0 PID: 177 Comm: poc-oob-read Not tainted 6.1.132 #1 [ 3.907131] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 3.907784] Call Trace: [ 3.907925] <TASK> [ 3.908048] dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x5c [ 3.908258] print_report+0x184/0x4be [ 3.909151] kasan_report+0xc5/0x100 [ 3.909539] kasan_check_range+0xf3/0x1a0 [ 3.909794] memcpy+0x1f/0x60 [ 3.909968] nla_put+0xa9/0xe0 [ 3.910147] tunnel_key_dump+0x945/0xba0 [ 3.911536] tcf_action_dump_1+0x1c1/0x340 [ 3.912436] tcf_action_dump+0x101/0x180 [ 3.912689] tcf_exts_dump+0x164/0x1e0 [ 3.912905] fw_dump+0x18b/0x2d0 [ 3.913483] tcf_fill_node+0x2ee/0x460 [ 3.914778] tfilter_notify+0xf4/0x180 [ 3.915208] tc_new_tfilter+0xd51/0x10d0 [ 3.918615] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x4a2/0x560 [ 3.919118] netlink_rcv_skb+0xcd/0x200 [ 3.919787] netlink_unicast+0x395/0x530 [ 3.921032] netlink_sendmsg+0x3d0/0x6d0 [ 3.921987] __sock_sendmsg+0x99/0xa0 [ 3.922220] __sys_sendto+0x1b7/0x240 [ 3.922682] __x64_sys_sendto+0x72/0x90 [ 3.922906] do_syscall_64+0x5e/0x90 [ 3.923814] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8 [ 3.924122] RIP: 0033:0x7e83eab84407 [ 3.924331] Code: 48 89 fa 4c 89 df e8 38 aa 00 00 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 74 1a 5b c3 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 8b 44 24 10 0f 05 <5b> c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 83 e2 39 83 faf [ 3.925330] RSP: 002b:00007ffff505e370 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c [ 3.925752] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007e83eaafa740 RCX: 00007e83eab84407 [ 3.926173] RDX: 00000000000001a8 RSI: 00007ffff505e3c0 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 3.926587] RBP: 00007ffff505f460 R08: 00007e83eace1000 R09: 000000000000000c [ 3.926977] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007ffff505f3c0 [ 3.927367] R13: 00007ffff505f5c8 R14: 00007e83ead1b000 R15: 00005d4fbbe6dcb8
Fix these issues by enforing correct length condition in related policies.(CVE-2025-22055)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
udp: Fix memory accounting leak.
Matt Dowling reported a weird UDP memory usage issue.
Under normal operation, the UDP memory usage reported in /proc/net/sockstat remains close to zero. However, it occasionally spiked to 524,288 pages and never dropped. Moreover, the value doubled when the application was terminated. Finally, it caused intermittent packet drops.
We can reproduce the issue with the script below [0]:
-
/proc/net/sockstat reports 0 pages
cat /proc/net/sockstat | grep UDP:
UDP: inuse 1 mem 0
-
Run the script till the report reaches 524,288
python3 test.py & sleep 5
cat /proc/net/sockstat | grep UDP:
UDP: inuse 3 mem 524288 <-- (INT_MAX + 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT
-
Kill the socket and confirm the number never drops
pkill python3 && sleep 5
cat /proc/net/sockstat | grep UDP:
UDP: inuse 1 mem 524288
-
(necessary since v6.0) Trigger proto_memory_pcpu_drain()
python3 test.py & sleep 1 && pkill python3
-
The number doubles
cat /proc/net/sockstat | grep UDP:
UDP: inuse 1 mem 1048577
The application set INT_MAX to SO_RCVBUF, which triggered an integer overflow in udp_rmem_release().
When a socket is close()d, udp_destruct_common() purges its receive queue and sums up skb->truesize in the queue. This total is calculated and stored in a local unsigned integer variable.
The total size is then passed to udp_rmem_release() to adjust memory accounting. However, because the function takes a signed integer argument, the total size can wrap around, causing an overflow.
Then, the released amount is calculated as follows:
1) Add size to sk->sk_forward_alloc. 2) Round down sk->sk_forward_alloc to the nearest lower multiple of PAGE_SIZE and assign it to amount. 3) Subtract amount from sk->sk_forward_alloc. 4) Pass amount >> PAGE_SHIFT to __sk_mem_reduce_allocated().
When the issue occurred, the total in udp_destruct_common() was 2147484480 (INT_MAX + 833), which was cast to -2147482816 in udp_rmem_release().
At 1) sk->sk_forward_alloc is changed from 3264 to -2147479552, and 2) sets -2147479552 to amount. 3) reverts the wraparound, so we don't see a warning in inet_sock_destruct(). However, udp_memory_allocated ends up doubling at 4).
Since commit 3cd3399dd7a8 ("net: implement per-cpu reserves for memory_allocated"), memory usage no longer doubles immediately after a socket is close()d because __sk_mem_reduce_allocated() caches the amount in udp_memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc. However, the next time a UDP socket receives a packet, the subtraction takes effect, causing UDP memory usage to double.
This issue makes further memory allocation fail once the socket's sk->sk_rmem_alloc exceeds net.ipv4.udp_rmem_min, resulting in packet drops.
To prevent this issue, let's use unsigned int for the calculation and call sk_forward_alloc_add() only once for the small delta.
Note that first_packet_length() also potentially has the same problem.
[0]: from socket import *
SO_RCVBUFFORCE = 33 INT_MAX = (2 ** 31) - 1
s = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM) s.bind(('', 0)) s.setsockopt(SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUFFORCE, INT_MAX)
c = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM) c.connect(s.getsockname())
data = b'a' * 100
while True: c.send(data)(CVE-2025-22058)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md/raid1,raid10: don't ignore IO flags
If blk-wbt is enabled by default, it's found that raid write performance is quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks, due to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist since blk-wbt is introduced.
Other than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, for example REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priority reverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, because io will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.
Fix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.
Fises: f51d46d0e7cb ("md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT")(CVE-2025-22125)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: fix OOB read when checking dotdot dir
Mounting a corrupted filesystem with directory which contains '.' dir entry with rec_len == block size results in out-of-bounds read (later on, when the corrupted directory is removed).
ext4_empty_dir() assumes every ext4 directory contains at least '.' and '..' as directory entries in the first data block. It first loads the '.' dir entry, performs sanity checks by calling ext4_check_dir_entry() and then uses its rec_len member to compute the location of '..' dir entry (in ext4_next_entry). It assumes the '..' dir entry fits into the same data block.
If the rec_len of '.' is precisely one block (4KB), it slips through the sanity checks (it is considered the last directory entry in the data block) and leaves "struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de" point exactly past the memory slot allocated to the data block. The following call to ext4_check_dir_entry() on new value of de then dereferences this pointer which results in out-of-bounds mem access.
Fix this by extending __ext4_check_dir_entry() to check for '.' dir entries that reach the end of data block. Make sure to ignore the phony dir entries for checksum (by checking name_len for non-zero).
Note: This is reported by KASAN as use-after-free in case another structure was recently freed from the slot past the bound, but it is really an OOB read.
This issue was found by syzkaller tool.
Call Trace: [ 38.594108] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.594649] Read of size 2 at addr ffff88802b41a004 by task syz-executor/5375 [ 38.595158] [ 38.595288] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5375 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7 #1 [ 38.595298] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 38.595304] Call Trace: [ 38.595308] <TASK> [ 38.595311] dump_stack_lvl+0xa7/0xd0 [ 38.595325] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x3f0 [ 38.595339] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595349] print_report+0xaa/0x250 [ 38.595359] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595368] ? kasan_addr_to_slab+0x9/0x90 [ 38.595378] kasan_report+0xab/0xe0 [ 38.595389] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595400] __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710 [ 38.595410] ext4_empty_dir+0x465/0x990 [ 38.595421] ? __pfx_ext4_empty_dir+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595432] ext4_rmdir.part.0+0x29a/0xd10 [ 38.595441] ? __dquot_initialize+0x2a7/0xbf0 [ 38.595455] ? __pfx_ext4_rmdir.part.0+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595464] ? __pfxdquotinitialize+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595478] ? down_write+0xdb/0x140 [ 38.595487] ? pfx_down_write+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595497] ext4_rmdir+0xee/0x140 [ 38.595506] vfs_rmdir+0x209/0x670 [ 38.595517] ? lookup_one_qstr_excl+0x3b/0x190 [ 38.595529] do_rmdir+0x363/0x3c0 [ 38.595537] ? __pfx_do_rmdir+0x10/0x10 [ 38.595544] ? strncpy_from_user+0x1ff/0x2e0 [ 38.595561] __x64_sys_unlinkat+0xf0/0x130 [ 38.595570] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x180 [ 38.595583] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e(CVE-2025-37785)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.19.90-2505.1.0.0326.oe2003sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncan: dev: can_get_echo_skb(): prevent call to kfree_skb() in hard IRQ context\n\nIf a driver calls can_get_echo_skb() during a hardware IRQ (which is often, but\nnot always, the case), the \u0026apos;WARN_ON(in_irq)\u0026apos; in\nnet/core/skbuff.c#skb_release_head_state() might be triggered, under network\ncongestion circumstances, together with the potential risk of a NULL pointer\ndereference.\n\nThe root cause of this issue is the call to kfree_skb() instead of\ndev_kfree_skb_irq() in net/core/dev.c#enqueue_to_backlog().\n\nThis patch prevents the skb to be freed within the call to netif_rx() by\nincrementing its reference count with skb_get(). The skb is finally freed by\none of the in-irq-context safe functions: dev_consume_skb_any() or\ndev_kfree_skb_any(). The \u0026quot;any\u0026quot; version is used because some drivers might call\ncan_get_echo_skb() in a normal context.\n\nThe reason for this issue to occur is that initially, in the core network\nstack, loopback skb were not supposed to be received in hardware IRQ context.\nThe CAN stack is an exeption.\n\nThis bug was previously reported back in 2017 in [1] but the proposed patch\nnever got accepted.\n\nWhile [1] directly modifies net/core/dev.c, we try to propose here a\nsmoother modification local to CAN network stack (the assumption\nbehind is that only CAN devices are affected by this issue).\n\n[1] http://lore.kernel.org/r/57a3ffb6-3309-3ad5-5a34-e93c3fe3614d@cetitec.com(CVE-2020-36789)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nvideo: fbdev: cirrusfb: check pixclock to avoid divide by zero\n\nDo a sanity check on pixclock value to avoid divide by zero.\n\nIf the pixclock value is zero, the cirrusfb driver will round up\npixclock to get the derived frequency as close to maxclock as\npossible.\n\nSyzkaller reported a divide error in cirrusfb_check_pixclock.\n\ndivide error: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI\nCPU: 0 PID: 14938 Comm: cirrusfb_test Not tainted 5.15.0-rc6 #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2\nRIP: 0010:cirrusfb_check_var+0x6f1/0x1260\n\nCall Trace:\n fb_set_var+0x398/0xf90\n do_fb_ioctl+0x4b8/0x6f0\n fb_ioctl+0xeb/0x130\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x19d/0x220\n do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae(CVE-2021-47641)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncan: dev: can_restart: fix use after free bug\n\nAfter calling netif_rx_ni(skb), dereferencing skb is unsafe.\nEspecially, the can_frame cf which aliases skb memory is accessed\nafter the netif_rx_ni() in:\n stats-\u0026gt;rx_bytes += cf-\u0026gt;len;\n\nReordering the lines solves the issue.(CVE-2021-47668)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncan: peak_usb: fix use after free bugs\n\nAfter calling peak_usb_netif_rx_ni(skb), dereferencing skb is unsafe.\nEspecially, the can_frame cf which aliases skb memory is accessed\nafter the peak_usb_netif_rx_ni().\n\nReordering the lines solves the issue.(CVE-2021-47670)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nqede: confirm skb is allocated before using\n\nqede_build_skb() assumes build_skb() always works and goes straight\nto skb_reserve(). However, build_skb() can fail under memory pressure.\nThis results in a kernel panic because the skb to reserve is NULL.\n\nAdd a check in case build_skb() failed to allocate and return NULL.\n\nThe NULL return is handled correctly in callers to qede_build_skb().(CVE-2022-49084)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: openvswitch: fix leak of nested actions\n\nWhile parsing user-provided actions, openvswitch module may dynamically\nallocate memory and store pointers in the internal copy of the actions.\nSo this memory has to be freed while destroying the actions.\n\nCurrently there are only two such actions: ct() and set(). However,\nthere are many actions that can hold nested lists of actions and\novs_nla_free_flow_actions() just jumps over them leaking the memory.\n\nFor example, removal of the flow with the following actions will lead\nto a leak of the memory allocated by nf_ct_tmpl_alloc():\n\n actions:clone(ct(commit),0)\n\nNon-freed set() action may also leak the \u0026apos;dst\u0026apos; structure for the\ntunnel info including device references.\n\nUnder certain conditions with a high rate of flow rotation that may\ncause significant memory leak problem (2MB per second in reporter\u0026apos;s\ncase). The problem is also hard to mitigate, because the user doesn\u0026apos;t\nhave direct control over the datapath flows generated by OVS.\n\nFix that by iterating over all the nested actions and freeing\neverything that needs to be freed recursively.\n\nNew build time assertion should protect us from this problem if new\nactions will be added in the future.\n\nUnfortunately, openvswitch module doesn\u0026apos;t use NLA_F_NESTED, so all\nattributes has to be explicitly checked. sample() and clone() actions\nare mixing extra attributes into the user-provided action list. That\nprevents some code generalization too.(CVE-2022-49086)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscsi: pm8001: Fix abort all task initialization\n\nIn pm80xx_send_abort_all(), the n_elem field of the ccb used is not\ninitialized to 0. This missing initialization sometimes lead to the task\ncompletion path seeing the ccb with a non-zero n_elem resulting in the\nexecution of invalid dma_unmap_sg() calls in pm8001_ccb_task_free(),\ncausing a crash such as:\n\n[ 197.676341] RIP: 0010:iommu_dma_unmap_sg+0x6d/0x280\n[ 197.700204] RSP: 0018:ffff889bbcf89c88 EFLAGS: 00010012\n[ 197.705485] RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff83d0bda0\n[ 197.712687] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88810dffc0d0\n[ 197.719887] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8881c790098b\n[ 197.727089] R10: ffffed1038f20131 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000\n[ 197.734296] R13: ffff88810dffc0d0 R14: 0000000000000010 R15: 0000000000000000\n[ 197.741493] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff889bbcf80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 197.749659] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 197.755459] CR2: 00007f16c1b42734 CR3: 0000000004814000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0\n[ 197.762656] Call Trace:\n[ 197.765127] \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n[ 197.767162] pm8001_ccb_task_free+0x5f1/0x820 [pm80xx]\n[ 197.772364] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x54/0x220\n[ 197.776680] pm8001_mpi_task_abort_resp+0x2ce/0x4f0 [pm80xx]\n[ 197.782406] process_oq+0xe85/0x7890 [pm80xx]\n[ 197.786817] ? lock_acquire+0x194/0x490\n[ 197.790697] ? handle_irq_event+0x10e/0x1b0\n[ 197.794920] ? mpi_sata_completion+0x2d70/0x2d70 [pm80xx]\n[ 197.800378] ? __wake_up_bit+0x100/0x100\n[ 197.804340] ? lock_is_held_type+0x98/0x110\n[ 197.808565] pm80xx_chip_isr+0x94/0x130 [pm80xx]\n[ 197.813243] tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0x24b/0x2f0\n[ 197.818785] __do_softirq+0x1b5/0x82d\n[ 197.822485] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x54/0x220\n[ 197.826799] __irq_exit_rcu+0x17e/0x1e0\n[ 197.830678] irq_exit_rcu+0xa/0x20\n[ 197.834114] common_interrupt+0x78/0x90\n[ 197.840051] \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n[ 197.844236] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 197.848397] asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40\n\nAvoid this issue by always initializing the ccb n_elem field to 0 in\npm8001_send_abort_all(), pm8001_send_read_log() and\npm80xx_send_abort_all().(CVE-2022-49217)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in amdgpu_dm_connector_add_common_modes()\n\nIn amdgpu_dm_connector_add_common_modes(), amdgpu_dm_create_common_mode()\nis assigned to mode and is passed to drm_mode_probed_add() directly after\nthat. drm_mode_probed_add() passes \u0026amp;mode-\u0026gt;head to list_add_tail(), and\nthere is a dereference of it in list_add_tail() without recoveries, which\ncould lead to NULL pointer dereference on failure of\namdgpu_dm_create_common_mode().\n\nFix this by adding a NULL check of mode.\n\nThis bug was found by a static analyzer.\n\nBuilds with \u0026apos;make allyesconfig\u0026apos; show no new warnings,\nand our static analyzer no longer warns about this code.(CVE-2022-49232)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nstaging: rtl8712: fix uninit-value in r871xu_drv_init()\n\nWhen \u0026apos;tmpU1b\u0026apos; returns from r8712_read8(padapter, EE_9346CR) is 0,\n\u0026apos;mac[6]\u0026apos; will not be initialized.\n\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in r871xu_drv_init+0x2d54/0x3070 drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_intf.c:541\n r871xu_drv_init+0x2d54/0x3070 drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_intf.c:541\n usb_probe_interface+0xf19/0x1600 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:396\n really_probe+0x653/0x14b0 drivers/base/dd.c:596\n __driver_probe_device+0x3e9/0x530 drivers/base/dd.c:752\n driver_probe_device drivers/base/dd.c:782 [inline]\n __device_attach_driver+0x79f/0x1120 drivers/base/dd.c:899\n bus_for_each_drv+0x2d6/0x3f0 drivers/base/bus.c:427\n __device_attach+0x593/0x8e0 drivers/base/dd.c:970\n device_initial_probe+0x4a/0x60 drivers/base/dd.c:1017\n bus_probe_device+0x17b/0x3e0 drivers/base/bus.c:487\n device_add+0x1fff/0x26e0 drivers/base/core.c:3405\n usb_set_configuration+0x37e9/0x3ed0 drivers/usb/core/message.c:2170\n usb_generic_driver_probe+0x13c/0x300 drivers/usb/core/generic.c:238\n usb_probe_device+0x309/0x570 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:293\n really_probe+0x653/0x14b0 drivers/base/dd.c:596\n __driver_probe_device+0x3e9/0x530 drivers/base/dd.c:752\n driver_probe_device drivers/base/dd.c:782 [inline]\n __device_attach_driver+0x79f/0x1120 drivers/base/dd.c:899\n bus_for_each_drv+0x2d6/0x3f0 drivers/base/bus.c:427\n __device_attach+0x593/0x8e0 drivers/base/dd.c:970\n device_initial_probe+0x4a/0x60 drivers/base/dd.c:1017\n bus_probe_device+0x17b/0x3e0 drivers/base/bus.c:487\n device_add+0x1fff/0x26e0 drivers/base/core.c:3405\n usb_new_device+0x1b8e/0x2950 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:2566\n hub_port_connect drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5358 [inline]\n hub_port_connect_change drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5502 [inline]\n port_event drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5660 [inline]\n hub_event+0x58e3/0x89e0 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5742\n process_one_work+0xdb6/0x1820 kernel/workqueue.c:2307\n worker_thread+0x10b3/0x21e0 kernel/workqueue.c:2454\n kthread+0x3c7/0x500 kernel/kthread.c:377\n ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30\n\nLocal variable mac created at:\n r871xu_drv_init+0x1771/0x3070 drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_intf.c:394\n usb_probe_interface+0xf19/0x1600 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:396\n\nKMSAN: uninit-value in r871xu_drv_init\nhttps://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=3cd92b1d85428b128503bfa7a250294c9ae00bd8(CVE-2022-49298)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndriver: base: fix UAF when driver_attach failed\n\nWhen driver_attach(drv); failed, the driver_private will be freed.\nBut it has been added to the bus, which caused a UAF.\n\nTo fix it, we need to delete it from the bus when failed.(CVE-2022-49385)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nRDMA/hfi1: Prevent panic when SDMA is disabled\n\nIf the hfi1 module is loaded with HFI1_CAP_SDMA off, a call to\nhfi1_write_iter() will dereference a NULL pointer and panic. A typical\nstack frame is:\n\n sdma_select_user_engine [hfi1]\n hfi1_user_sdma_process_request [hfi1]\n hfi1_write_iter [hfi1]\n do_iter_readv_writev\n do_iter_write\n vfs_writev\n do_writev\n do_syscall_64\n\nThe fix is to test for SDMA in hfi1_write_iter() and fail the I/O with\nEINVAL.(CVE-2022-49429)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsfc: fix use after free when disabling sriov\n\nUse after free is detected by kfence when disabling sriov. What was read\nafter being freed was vf-\u0026gt;pci_dev: it was freed from pci_disable_sriov\nand later read in efx_ef10_sriov_free_vf_vports, called from\nefx_ef10_sriov_free_vf_vswitching.\n\nSet the pointer to NULL at release time to not trying to read it later.\n\nReproducer and dmesg log (note that kfence doesn\u0026apos;t detect it every time):\n$ echo 1 \u0026gt; /sys/class/net/enp65s0f0np0/device/sriov_numvfs\n$ echo 0 \u0026gt; /sys/class/net/enp65s0f0np0/device/sriov_numvfs\n\n BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free read in efx_ef10_sriov_free_vf_vswitching+0x82/0x170 [sfc]\n\n Use-after-free read at 0x00000000ff3c1ba5 (in kfence-#224):\n efx_ef10_sriov_free_vf_vswitching+0x82/0x170 [sfc]\n efx_ef10_pci_sriov_disable+0x38/0x70 [sfc]\n efx_pci_sriov_configure+0x24/0x40 [sfc]\n sriov_numvfs_store+0xfe/0x140\n kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11c/0x1b0\n new_sync_write+0x11f/0x1b0\n vfs_write+0x1eb/0x280\n ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0\n do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x80\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\n\n kfence-#224: 0x00000000edb8ef95-0x00000000671f5ce1, size=2792, cache=kmalloc-4k\n\n allocated by task 6771 on cpu 10 at 3137.860196s:\n pci_alloc_dev+0x21/0x60\n pci_iov_add_virtfn+0x2a2/0x320\n sriov_enable+0x212/0x3e0\n efx_ef10_sriov_configure+0x67/0x80 [sfc]\n efx_pci_sriov_configure+0x24/0x40 [sfc]\n sriov_numvfs_store+0xba/0x140\n kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11c/0x1b0\n new_sync_write+0x11f/0x1b0\n vfs_write+0x1eb/0x280\n ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0\n do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x80\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\n\n freed by task 6771 on cpu 12 at 3170.991309s:\n device_release+0x34/0x90\n kobject_cleanup+0x3a/0x130\n pci_iov_remove_virtfn+0xd9/0x120\n sriov_disable+0x30/0xe0\n efx_ef10_pci_sriov_disable+0x57/0x70 [sfc]\n efx_pci_sriov_configure+0x24/0x40 [sfc]\n sriov_numvfs_store+0xfe/0x140\n kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11c/0x1b0\n new_sync_write+0x11f/0x1b0\n vfs_write+0x1eb/0x280\n ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0\n do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x80\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae(CVE-2022-49626)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncgroup: Use separate src/dst nodes when preloading css_sets for migration\n\nEach cset (css_set) is pinned by its tasks. When we\u0026apos;re moving tasks around\nacross csets for a migration, we need to hold the source and destination\ncsets to ensure that they don\u0026apos;t go away while we\u0026apos;re moving tasks about. This\nis done by linking cset-\u0026gt;mg_preload_node on either the\nmgctx-\u0026gt;preloaded_src_csets or mgctx-\u0026gt;preloaded_dst_csets list. Using the\nsame cset-\u0026gt;mg_preload_node for both the src and dst lists was deemed okay as\na cset can\u0026apos;t be both the source and destination at the same time.\n\nUnfortunately, this overloading becomes problematic when multiple tasks are\ninvolved in a migration and some of them are identity noop migrations while\nothers are actually moving across cgroups. For example, this can happen with\nthe following sequence on cgroup1:\n\n #1\u0026gt; mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/misc/a/b\n #2\u0026gt; echo $$ \u0026gt; /sys/fs/cgroup/misc/a/cgroup.procs\n #3\u0026gt; RUN_A_COMMAND_WHICH_CREATES_MULTIPLE_THREADS \u0026amp;\n #4\u0026gt; PID=$!\n #5\u0026gt; echo $PID \u0026gt; /sys/fs/cgroup/misc/a/b/tasks\n #6\u0026gt; echo $PID \u0026gt; /sys/fs/cgroup/misc/a/cgroup.procs\n\nthe process including the group leader back into a. In this final migration,\nnon-leader threads would be doing identity migration while the group leader\nis doing an actual one.\n\nAfter #3, let\u0026apos;s say the whole process was in cset A, and that after #4, the\nleader moves to cset B. Then, during #6, the following happens:\n\n 1. cgroup_migrate_add_src() is called on B for the leader.\n\n 2. cgroup_migrate_add_src() is called on A for the other threads.\n\n 3. cgroup_migrate_prepare_dst() is called. It scans the src list.\n\n 4. It notices that B wants to migrate to A, so it tries to A to the dst\n list but realizes that its -\u0026gt;mg_preload_node is already busy.\n\n 5. and then it notices A wants to migrate to A as it\u0026apos;s an identity\n migration, it culls it by list_del_init()\u0026apos;ing its -\u0026gt;mg_preload_node and\n putting references accordingly.\n\n 6. The rest of migration takes place with B on the src list but nothing on\n the dst list.\n\nThis means that A isn\u0026apos;t held while migration is in progress. If all tasks\nleave A before the migration finishes and the incoming task pins it, the\ncset will be destroyed leading to use-after-free.\n\nThis is caused by overloading cset-\u0026gt;mg_preload_node for both src and dst\npreload lists. We wanted to exclude the cset from the src list but ended up\ninadvertently excluding it from the dst list too.\n\nThis patch fixes the issue by separating out cset-\u0026gt;mg_preload_node into\n-\u0026gt;mg_src_preload_node and -\u0026gt;mg_dst_preload_node, so that the src and dst\npreloadings don\u0026apos;t interfere with each other.(CVE-2022-49647)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/khugepaged: fix -\u0026gt;anon_vma race\n\nIf an -\u0026gt;anon_vma is attached to the VMA, collapse_and_free_pmd() requires\nit to be locked.\n\nPage table traversal is allowed under any one of the mmap lock, the\nanon_vma lock (if the VMA is associated with an anon_vma), and the\nmapping lock (if the VMA is associated with a mapping); and so to be\nable to remove page tables, we must hold all three of them. \nretract_page_tables() bails out if an -\u0026gt;anon_vma is attached, but does\nthis check before holding the mmap lock (as the comment above the check\nexplains).\n\nIf we racily merged an existing -\u0026gt;anon_vma (shared with a child\nprocess) from a neighboring VMA, subsequent rmap traversals on pages\nbelonging to the child will be able to see the page tables that we are\nconcurrently removing while assuming that nothing else can access them.\n\nRepeat the -\u0026gt;anon_vma check once we hold the mmap lock to ensure that\nthere really is no concurrent page table access.\n\nHitting this bug causes a lockdep warning in collapse_and_free_pmd(),\nin the line \u0026quot;lockdep_assert_held_write(\u0026amp;vma-\u0026gt;anon_vma-\u0026gt;root-\u0026gt;rwsem)\u0026quot;. \nIt can also lead to use-after-free access.(CVE-2023-52935)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: mdio: validate parameter addr in mdiobus_get_phy()\n\nThe caller may pass any value as addr, what may result in an out-of-bounds\naccess to array mdio_map. One existing case is stmmac_init_phy() that\nmay pass -1 as addr. Therefore validate addr before using it.(CVE-2023-53019)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: nfc: Fix use-after-free in local_cleanup()\n\nFix a use-after-free that occurs in kfree_skb() called from\nlocal_cleanup(). This could happen when killing nfc daemon (e.g. neard)\nafter detaching an nfc device.\nWhen detaching an nfc device, local_cleanup() called from\nnfc_llcp_unregister_device() frees local-\u0026gt;rx_pending and decreases\nlocal-\u0026gt;ref by kref_put() in nfc_llcp_local_put().\nIn the terminating process, nfc daemon releases all sockets and it leads\nto decreasing local-\u0026gt;ref. After the last release of local-\u0026gt;ref,\nlocal_cleanup() called from local_release() frees local-\u0026gt;rx_pending\nagain, which leads to the bug.\n\nSetting local-\u0026gt;rx_pending to NULL in local_cleanup() could prevent\nuse-after-free when local_cleanup() is called twice.\n\nFound by a modified version of syzkaller.\n\nBUG: KASAN: use-after-free in kfree_skb()\n\nCall Trace:\ndump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:106)\nprint_address_description.constprop.0.cold (mm/kasan/report.c:306)\nkasan_check_range (mm/kasan/generic.c:189)\nkfree_skb (net/core/skbuff.c:955)\nlocal_cleanup (net/nfc/llcp_core.c:159)\nnfc_llcp_local_put.part.0 (net/nfc/llcp_core.c:172)\nnfc_llcp_local_put (net/nfc/llcp_core.c:181)\nllcp_sock_destruct (net/nfc/llcp_sock.c:959)\n__sk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2133)\nsk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2181)\n__sk_free (net/core/sock.c:2192)\nsk_free (net/core/sock.c:2203)\nllcp_sock_release (net/nfc/llcp_sock.c:646)\n__sock_release (net/socket.c:650)\nsock_close (net/socket.c:1365)\n__fput (fs/file_table.c:306)\ntask_work_run (kernel/task_work.c:179)\nptrace_notify (kernel/signal.c:2354)\nsyscall_exit_to_user_mode_prepare (kernel/entry/common.c:278)\nsyscall_exit_to_user_mode (kernel/entry/common.c:296)\ndo_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:86)\nentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:106)\n\nAllocated by task 4719:\nkasan_save_stack (mm/kasan/common.c:45)\n__kasan_slab_alloc (mm/kasan/common.c:325)\nslab_post_alloc_hook (mm/slab.h:766)\nkmem_cache_alloc_node (mm/slub.c:3497)\n__alloc_skb (net/core/skbuff.c:552)\npn533_recv_response (drivers/nfc/pn533/usb.c:65)\n__usb_hcd_giveback_urb (drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1671)\nusb_giveback_urb_bh (drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1704)\ntasklet_action_common.isra.0 (kernel/softirq.c:797)\n__do_softirq (kernel/softirq.c:571)\n\nFreed by task 1901:\nkasan_save_stack (mm/kasan/common.c:45)\nkasan_set_track (mm/kasan/common.c:52)\nkasan_save_free_info (mm/kasan/genericdd.c:518)\n__kasan_slab_free (mm/kasan/common.c:236)\nkmem_cache_free (mm/slub.c:3809)\nkfree_skbmem (net/core/skbuff.c:874)\nkfree_skb (net/core/skbuff.c:931)\nlocal_cleanup (net/nfc/llcp_core.c:159)\nnfc_llcp_unregister_device (net/nfc/llcp_core.c:1617)\nnfc_unregister_device (net/nfc/core.c:1179)\npn53x_unregister_nfc (drivers/nfc/pn533/pn533.c:2846)\npn533_usb_disconnect (drivers/nfc/pn533/usb.c:579)\nusb_unbind_interface (drivers/usb/core/driver.c:458)\ndevice_release_driver_internal (drivers/base/dd.c:1279)\nbus_remove_device (drivers/base/bus.c:529)\ndevice_del (drivers/base/core.c:3665)\nusb_disable_device (drivers/usb/core/message.c:1420)\nusb_disconnect (drivers/usb/core.c:2261)\nhub_event (drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5833)\nprocess_one_work (arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:27 include/linux/jump_label.h:212 include/trace/events/workqueue.h:108 kernel/workqueue.c:2281)\nworker_thread (include/linux/list.h:282 kernel/workqueue.c:2423)\nkthread (kernel/kthread.c:319)\nret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:301)(CVE-2023-53023)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: ipset: Fix overflow before widen in the bitmap_ip_create() function.\n\nWhen first_ip is 0, last_ip is 0xFFFFFFFF, and netmask is 31, the value of\nan arithmetic expression 2 \u0026lt;\u0026lt; (netmask - mask_bits - 1) is subject\nto overflow due to a failure casting operands to a larger data type\nbefore performing the arithmetic.\n\nNote that it\u0026apos;s harmless since the value will be checked at the next step.\n\nFound by InfoTeCS on behalf of Linux Verification Center\n(linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2023-53032)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\njfs: add check read-only before truncation in jfs_truncate_nolock()\n\nAdded a check for \u0026quot;read-only\u0026quot; mode in the `jfs_truncate_nolock`\nfunction to avoid errors related to writing to a read-only\nfilesystem.\n\nCall stack:\n\nblock_write_begin() {\n jfs_write_failed() {\n jfs_truncate() {\n jfs_truncate_nolock() {\n txEnd() {\n ...\n log = JFS_SBI(tblk-\u0026gt;sb)-\u0026gt;log;\n // (log == NULL)\n\nIf the `isReadOnly(ip)` condition is triggered in\n`jfs_truncate_nolock`, the function execution will stop, and no\nfurther data modification will occur. Instead, the `xtTruncate`\nfunction will be called with the \u0026quot;COMMIT_WMAP\u0026quot; flag, preventing\nmodifications in \u0026quot;read-only\u0026quot; mode.(CVE-2024-58094)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipv6: mcast: extend RCU protection in igmp6_send()\n\nigmp6_send() can be called without RTNL or RCU being held.\n\nExtend RCU protection so that we can safely fetch the net pointer\nand avoid a potential UAF.\n\nNote that we no longer can use sock_alloc_send_skb() because\nipv6.igmp_sk uses GFP_KERNEL allocations which can sleep.\n\nInstead use alloc_skb() and charge the net-\u0026gt;ipv6.igmp_sk\nsocket under RCU protection.(CVE-2025-21759)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nndisc: extend RCU protection in ndisc_send_skb()\n\nndisc_send_skb() can be called without RTNL or RCU held.\n\nAcquire rcu_read_lock() earlier, so that we can use dev_net_rcu()\nand avoid a potential UAF.(CVE-2025-21760)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nopenvswitch: use RCU protection in ovs_vport_cmd_fill_info()\n\novs_vport_cmd_fill_info() can be called without RTNL or RCU.\n\nUse RCU protection and dev_net_rcu() to avoid potential UAF.(CVE-2025-21761)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\narp: use RCU protection in arp_xmit()\n\narp_xmit() can be called without RTNL or RCU protection.\n\nUse RCU protection to avoid potential UAF.(CVE-2025-21762)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nneighbour: use RCU protection in __neigh_notify()\n\n__neigh_notify() can be called without RTNL or RCU protection.\n\nUse RCU protection to avoid potential UAF.(CVE-2025-21763)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nndisc: use RCU protection in ndisc_alloc_skb()\n\nndisc_alloc_skb() can be called without RTNL or RCU being held.\n\nAdd RCU protection to avoid possible UAF.(CVE-2025-21764)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\niscsi_ibft: Fix UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warning in ibft_attr_show_nic()\n\nWhen performing an iSCSI boot using IPv6, iscsistart still reads the\n/sys/firmware/ibft/ethernetX/subnet-mask entry. Since the IPv6 prefix\nlength is 64, this causes the shift exponent to become negative,\ntriggering a UBSAN warning. As the concept of a subnet mask does not\napply to IPv6, the value is set to ~0 to suppress the warning message.(CVE-2025-21993)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: atm: fix use after free in lec_send()\n\nThe -\u0026gt;send() operation frees skb so save the length before calling\n-\u0026gt;send() to avoid a use after free.(CVE-2025-22004)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ntracing: Fix use-after-free in print_graph_function_flags during tracer switching\n\nKairui reported a UAF issue in print_graph_function_flags() during\nftrace stress testing [1]. This issue can be reproduced if puting a\n\u0026apos;mdelay(10)\u0026apos; after \u0026apos;mutex_unlock(\u0026amp;trace_types_lock)\u0026apos; in s_start(),\nand executing the following script:\n\n $ echo function_graph \u0026gt; current_tracer\n $ cat trace \u0026gt; /dev/null \u0026amp;\n $ sleep 5 # Ensure the \u0026apos;cat\u0026apos; reaches the \u0026apos;mdelay(10)\u0026apos; point\n $ echo timerlat \u0026gt; current_tracer\n\nThe root cause lies in the two calls to print_graph_function_flags\nwithin print_trace_line during each s_show():\n\n * One through \u0026apos;iter-\u0026gt;trace-\u0026gt;print_line()\u0026apos;;\n * Another through \u0026apos;event-\u0026gt;funcs-\u0026gt;trace()\u0026apos;, which is hidden in\n print_trace_fmt() before print_trace_line returns.\n\nTracer switching only updates the former, while the latter continues\nto use the print_line function of the old tracer, which in the script\nabove is print_graph_function_flags.\n\nMoreover, when switching from the \u0026apos;function_graph\u0026apos; tracer to the\n\u0026apos;timerlat\u0026apos; tracer, s_start only calls graph_trace_close of the\n\u0026apos;function_graph\u0026apos; tracer to free \u0026apos;iter-\u0026gt;private\u0026apos;, but does not set\nit to NULL. This provides an opportunity for \u0026apos;event-\u0026gt;funcs-\u0026gt;trace()\u0026apos;\nto use an invalid \u0026apos;iter-\u0026gt;private\u0026apos;.\n\nTo fix this issue, set \u0026apos;iter-\u0026gt;private\u0026apos; to NULL immediately after\nfreeing it in graph_trace_close(), ensuring that an invalid pointer\nis not passed to other tracers. Additionally, clean up the unnecessary\n\u0026apos;iter-\u0026gt;private = NULL\u0026apos; during each \u0026apos;cat trace\u0026apos; when using wakeup and\nirqsoff tracers.\n\n [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231112150030.84609-1-ryncsn@gmail.com/(CVE-2025-22035)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: fix geneve_opt length integer overflow\n\nstruct geneve_opt uses 5 bit length for each single option, which\nmeans every vary size option should be smaller than 128 bytes.\n\nHowever, all current related Netlink policies cannot promise this\nlength condition and the attacker can exploit a exact 128-byte size\noption to *fake* a zero length option and confuse the parsing logic,\nfurther achieve heap out-of-bounds read.\n\nOne example crash log is like below:\n\n[ 3.905425] ==================================================================\n[ 3.905925] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in nla_put+0xa9/0xe0\n[ 3.906255] Read of size 124 at addr ffff888005f291cc by task poc/177\n[ 3.906646]\n[ 3.906775] CPU: 0 PID: 177 Comm: poc-oob-read Not tainted 6.1.132 #1\n[ 3.907131] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\n[ 3.907784] Call Trace:\n[ 3.907925] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 3.908048] dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x5c\n[ 3.908258] print_report+0x184/0x4be\n[ 3.909151] kasan_report+0xc5/0x100\n[ 3.909539] kasan_check_range+0xf3/0x1a0\n[ 3.909794] memcpy+0x1f/0x60\n[ 3.909968] nla_put+0xa9/0xe0\n[ 3.910147] tunnel_key_dump+0x945/0xba0\n[ 3.911536] tcf_action_dump_1+0x1c1/0x340\n[ 3.912436] tcf_action_dump+0x101/0x180\n[ 3.912689] tcf_exts_dump+0x164/0x1e0\n[ 3.912905] fw_dump+0x18b/0x2d0\n[ 3.913483] tcf_fill_node+0x2ee/0x460\n[ 3.914778] tfilter_notify+0xf4/0x180\n[ 3.915208] tc_new_tfilter+0xd51/0x10d0\n[ 3.918615] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x4a2/0x560\n[ 3.919118] netlink_rcv_skb+0xcd/0x200\n[ 3.919787] netlink_unicast+0x395/0x530\n[ 3.921032] netlink_sendmsg+0x3d0/0x6d0\n[ 3.921987] __sock_sendmsg+0x99/0xa0\n[ 3.922220] __sys_sendto+0x1b7/0x240\n[ 3.922682] __x64_sys_sendto+0x72/0x90\n[ 3.922906] do_syscall_64+0x5e/0x90\n[ 3.923814] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8\n[ 3.924122] RIP: 0033:0x7e83eab84407\n[ 3.924331] Code: 48 89 fa 4c 89 df e8 38 aa 00 00 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 74 1a 5b c3 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 8b 44 24 10 0f 05 \u0026lt;5b\u0026gt; c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 83 e2 39 83 faf\n[ 3.925330] RSP: 002b:00007ffff505e370 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c\n[ 3.925752] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007e83eaafa740 RCX: 00007e83eab84407\n[ 3.926173] RDX: 00000000000001a8 RSI: 00007ffff505e3c0 RDI: 0000000000000003\n[ 3.926587] RBP: 00007ffff505f460 R08: 00007e83eace1000 R09: 000000000000000c\n[ 3.926977] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007ffff505f3c0\n[ 3.927367] R13: 00007ffff505f5c8 R14: 00007e83ead1b000 R15: 00005d4fbbe6dcb8\n\nFix these issues by enforing correct length condition in related\npolicies.(CVE-2025-22055)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nudp: Fix memory accounting leak.\n\nMatt Dowling reported a weird UDP memory usage issue.\n\nUnder normal operation, the UDP memory usage reported in /proc/net/sockstat\nremains close to zero. However, it occasionally spiked to 524,288 pages\nand never dropped. Moreover, the value doubled when the application was\nterminated. Finally, it caused intermittent packet drops.\n\nWe can reproduce the issue with the script below [0]:\n\n 1. /proc/net/sockstat reports 0 pages\n\n # cat /proc/net/sockstat | grep UDP:\n UDP: inuse 1 mem 0\n\n 2. Run the script till the report reaches 524,288\n\n # python3 test.py \u0026amp; sleep 5\n # cat /proc/net/sockstat | grep UDP:\n UDP: inuse 3 mem 524288 \u0026lt;-- (INT_MAX + 1) \u0026gt;\u0026gt; PAGE_SHIFT\n\n 3. Kill the socket and confirm the number never drops\n\n # pkill python3 \u0026amp;\u0026amp; sleep 5\n # cat /proc/net/sockstat | grep UDP:\n UDP: inuse 1 mem 524288\n\n 4. (necessary since v6.0) Trigger proto_memory_pcpu_drain()\n\n # python3 test.py \u0026amp; sleep 1 \u0026amp;\u0026amp; pkill python3\n\n 5. The number doubles\n\n # cat /proc/net/sockstat | grep UDP:\n UDP: inuse 1 mem 1048577\n\nThe application set INT_MAX to SO_RCVBUF, which triggered an integer\noverflow in udp_rmem_release().\n\nWhen a socket is close()d, udp_destruct_common() purges its receive\nqueue and sums up skb-\u0026gt;truesize in the queue. This total is calculated\nand stored in a local unsigned integer variable.\n\nThe total size is then passed to udp_rmem_release() to adjust memory\naccounting. However, because the function takes a signed integer\nargument, the total size can wrap around, causing an overflow.\n\nThen, the released amount is calculated as follows:\n\n 1) Add size to sk-\u0026gt;sk_forward_alloc.\n 2) Round down sk-\u0026gt;sk_forward_alloc to the nearest lower multiple of\n PAGE_SIZE and assign it to amount.\n 3) Subtract amount from sk-\u0026gt;sk_forward_alloc.\n 4) Pass amount \u0026gt;\u0026gt; PAGE_SHIFT to __sk_mem_reduce_allocated().\n\nWhen the issue occurred, the total in udp_destruct_common() was 2147484480\n(INT_MAX + 833), which was cast to -2147482816 in udp_rmem_release().\n\nAt 1) sk-\u0026gt;sk_forward_alloc is changed from 3264 to -2147479552, and\n2) sets -2147479552 to amount. 3) reverts the wraparound, so we don\u0026apos;t\nsee a warning in inet_sock_destruct(). However, udp_memory_allocated\nends up doubling at 4).\n\nSince commit 3cd3399dd7a8 (\u0026quot;net: implement per-cpu reserves for\nmemory_allocated\u0026quot;), memory usage no longer doubles immediately after\na socket is close()d because __sk_mem_reduce_allocated() caches the\namount in udp_memory_per_cpu_fw_alloc. However, the next time a UDP\nsocket receives a packet, the subtraction takes effect, causing UDP\nmemory usage to double.\n\nThis issue makes further memory allocation fail once the socket\u0026apos;s\nsk-\u0026gt;sk_rmem_alloc exceeds net.ipv4.udp_rmem_min, resulting in packet\ndrops.\n\nTo prevent this issue, let\u0026apos;s use unsigned int for the calculation and\ncall sk_forward_alloc_add() only once for the small delta.\n\nNote that first_packet_length() also potentially has the same problem.\n\n[0]:\nfrom socket import *\n\nSO_RCVBUFFORCE = 33\nINT_MAX = (2 ** 31) - 1\n\ns = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM)\ns.bind((\u0026apos;\u0026apos;, 0))\ns.setsockopt(SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUFFORCE, INT_MAX)\n\nc = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM)\nc.connect(s.getsockname())\n\ndata = b\u0026apos;a\u0026apos; * 100\n\nwhile True:\n c.send(data)(CVE-2025-22058)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmd/raid1,raid10: don\u0026apos;t ignore IO flags\n\nIf blk-wbt is enabled by default, it\u0026apos;s found that raid write performance\nis quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks,\ndue to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist since\nblk-wbt is introduced.\n\nOther than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, for\nexample REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priority\nreverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, because\nio will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.\n\nFix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.\n\nFises: f51d46d0e7cb (\u0026quot;md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT\u0026quot;)(CVE-2025-22125)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: fix OOB read when checking dotdot dir\n\nMounting a corrupted filesystem with directory which contains \u0026apos;.\u0026apos; dir\nentry with rec_len == block size results in out-of-bounds read (later\non, when the corrupted directory is removed).\n\next4_empty_dir() assumes every ext4 directory contains at least \u0026apos;.\u0026apos;\nand \u0026apos;..\u0026apos; as directory entries in the first data block. It first loads\nthe \u0026apos;.\u0026apos; dir entry, performs sanity checks by calling ext4_check_dir_entry()\nand then uses its rec_len member to compute the location of \u0026apos;..\u0026apos; dir\nentry (in ext4_next_entry). It assumes the \u0026apos;..\u0026apos; dir entry fits into the\nsame data block.\n\nIf the rec_len of \u0026apos;.\u0026apos; is precisely one block (4KB), it slips through the\nsanity checks (it is considered the last directory entry in the data\nblock) and leaves \u0026quot;struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *de\u0026quot; point exactly past the\nmemory slot allocated to the data block. The following call to\next4_check_dir_entry() on new value of de then dereferences this pointer\nwhich results in out-of-bounds mem access.\n\nFix this by extending __ext4_check_dir_entry() to check for \u0026apos;.\u0026apos; dir\nentries that reach the end of data block. Make sure to ignore the phony\ndir entries for checksum (by checking name_len for non-zero).\n\nNote: This is reported by KASAN as use-after-free in case another\nstructure was recently freed from the slot past the bound, but it is\nreally an OOB read.\n\nThis issue was found by syzkaller tool.\n\nCall Trace:\n[ 38.594108] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710\n[ 38.594649] Read of size 2 at addr ffff88802b41a004 by task syz-executor/5375\n[ 38.595158]\n[ 38.595288] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5375 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7 #1\n[ 38.595298] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\n[ 38.595304] Call Trace:\n[ 38.595308] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 38.595311] dump_stack_lvl+0xa7/0xd0\n[ 38.595325] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x2c/0x3f0\n[ 38.595339] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710\n[ 38.595349] print_report+0xaa/0x250\n[ 38.595359] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710\n[ 38.595368] ? kasan_addr_to_slab+0x9/0x90\n[ 38.595378] kasan_report+0xab/0xe0\n[ 38.595389] ? __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710\n[ 38.595400] __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x67e/0x710\n[ 38.595410] ext4_empty_dir+0x465/0x990\n[ 38.595421] ? __pfx_ext4_empty_dir+0x10/0x10\n[ 38.595432] ext4_rmdir.part.0+0x29a/0xd10\n[ 38.595441] ? __dquot_initialize+0x2a7/0xbf0\n[ 38.595455] ? __pfx_ext4_rmdir.part.0+0x10/0x10\n[ 38.595464] ? __pfx___dquot_initialize+0x10/0x10\n[ 38.595478] ? down_write+0xdb/0x140\n[ 38.595487] ? __pfx_down_write+0x10/0x10\n[ 38.595497] ext4_rmdir+0xee/0x140\n[ 38.595506] vfs_rmdir+0x209/0x670\n[ 38.595517] ? lookup_one_qstr_excl+0x3b/0x190\n[ 38.595529] do_rmdir+0x363/0x3c0\n[ 38.595537] ? __pfx_do_rmdir+0x10/0x10\n[ 38.595544] ? strncpy_from_user+0x1ff/0x2e0\n[ 38.595561] __x64_sys_unlinkat+0xf0/0x130\n[ 38.595570] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x180\n[ 38.595583] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e(CVE-2025-37785)",
"id": "OESA-2025-1465",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:08:33Z",
"published": "2025-05-09T11:08:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-1465"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36789"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47641"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47668"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47670"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49084"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49086"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49217"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49232"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49298"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49385"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49429"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49626"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49647"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52935"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53019"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53023"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53032"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58094"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21759"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21760"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21761"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21762"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21763"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21764"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21993"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22004"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22035"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22055"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22058"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22125"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37785"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2020-36789",
"CVE-2021-47641",
"CVE-2021-47668",
"CVE-2021-47670",
"CVE-2022-49084",
"CVE-2022-49086",
"CVE-2022-49217",
"CVE-2022-49232",
"CVE-2022-49298",
"CVE-2022-49385",
"CVE-2022-49429",
"CVE-2022-49626",
"CVE-2022-49647",
"CVE-2023-52935",
"CVE-2023-53019",
"CVE-2023-53023",
"CVE-2023-53032",
"CVE-2024-58094",
"CVE-2025-21759",
"CVE-2025-21760",
"CVE-2025-21761",
"CVE-2025-21762",
"CVE-2025-21763",
"CVE-2025-21764",
"CVE-2025-21993",
"CVE-2025-22004",
"CVE-2025-22035",
"CVE-2025-22055",
"CVE-2025-22058",
"CVE-2025-22125",
"CVE-2025-37785"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.