Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2025-21919 (GCVE-0-2025-21919)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-04-01 15:40 – Updated: 2026-09-08 08:40- CWE-787 - Out-of-bounds Write
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984 , < 5cb300dcdd27e6a351ac02541e0231261c775852
(git)
Affected: fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984 , < 000c9ee43928f2ce68a156dd40bab7616256f4dd (git) Affected: fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984 , < 9cc7f0018609f75a349e42e3aebc3b0e905ba775 (git) Affected: fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984 , < b5741e4b9ef3567613b2351384f91d3f16e59986 (git) Affected: fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984 , < e1dd09df30ba86716cb2ffab97dc35195c01eb8f (git) Affected: fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984 , < 3b4035ddbfc8e4521f85569998a7569668cccf51 (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
5.13
Unaffected: 0 , < 5.13 (semver) Unaffected: 5.15.179 , ≤ 5.15.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.1.131 , ≤ 6.1.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.83 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.12.19 , ≤ 6.12.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.13.7 , ≤ 6.13.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.14 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed | |
| Siemens | SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP |
Affected:
V3.1.6 , < *
(custom)
|
guessed | |
| Siemens | SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP |
Affected:
V3.1.6 , < *
(custom)
|
guessed | |
| Siemens | SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP |
Affected:
V3.1.6 , < *
(custom)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-21919",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-01T19:23:59.713530Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-787",
"description": "CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-01T19:26:33.844Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T19:39:11.086Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00045.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-08T08:40:56.687Z",
"orgId": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"shortName": "siemens-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-019113.html"
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"kernel/sched/fair.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5cb300dcdd27e6a351ac02541e0231261c775852",
"status": "affected",
"version": "fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "000c9ee43928f2ce68a156dd40bab7616256f4dd",
"status": "affected",
"version": "fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "9cc7f0018609f75a349e42e3aebc3b0e905ba775",
"status": "affected",
"version": "fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "b5741e4b9ef3567613b2351384f91d3f16e59986",
"status": "affected",
"version": "fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e1dd09df30ba86716cb2ffab97dc35195c01eb8f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3b4035ddbfc8e4521f85569998a7569668cccf51",
"status": "affected",
"version": "fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"kernel/sched/fair.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.13"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.13",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.179",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.131",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.83",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.19",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.13.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.13.7",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.14",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.179",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.131",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.83",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.19",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.13.7",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.14",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.13",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsched/fair: Fix potential memory corruption in child_cfs_rq_on_list\n\nchild_cfs_rq_on_list attempts to convert a \u0027prev\u0027 pointer to a cfs_rq.\nThis \u0027prev\u0027 pointer can originate from struct rq\u0027s leaf_cfs_rq_list,\nmaking the conversion invalid and potentially leading to memory\ncorruption. Depending on the relative positions of leaf_cfs_rq_list and\nthe task group (tg) pointer within the struct, this can cause a memory\nfault or access garbage data.\n\nThe issue arises in list_add_leaf_cfs_rq, where both\ncfs_rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list and rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list are added to the same\nleaf list. Also, rq-\u003etmp_alone_branch can be set to rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list.\n\nThis adds a check `if (prev == \u0026rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list)` after the main\nconditional in child_cfs_rq_on_list. This ensures that the container_of\noperation will convert a correct cfs_rq struct.\n\nThis check is sufficient because only cfs_rqs on the same CPU are added\nto the list, so verifying the \u0027prev\u0027 pointer against the current rq\u0027s list\nhead is enough.\n\nFixes a potential memory corruption issue that due to current struct\nlayout might not be manifesting as a crash but could lead to unpredictable\nbehavior when the layout changes."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AV:L - The defect is in core CFS scheduler code (`kernel/sched/fair.c`) reached through ordinary local scheduling activity, cgroup manipulation, and CFS-bandwidth unthrottling; there is no network-facing input path. Exploitation requires the ability to run code on the machine.\nAC:L - The invalid `container_of()` executes deterministically every time the examined cfs_rq is first on `rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list` or `rq-\u003etmp_alone_branch` is at its reset value, which is the normal steady state \u2014 no race to win and no unusual precondition. An attacker reliably drives it by creating/loading a cgroup in a delegated subtree and letting the load balancer or bandwidth timer run.\nPR:L - No capability check, credential test, or privileged gate exists on `__update_blocked_fair()` or `tg_unthrottle_up()`; an ordinary unprivileged user reaches both via normal task execution and via cgroup v2 cpu/cpu.max controls in a systemd- or container-delegated subtree. Real root in the init namespace is not needed.\nUI:N - The vulnerable path runs from the periodic load-balance softirq and the CFS bandwidth timer, with no victim action of any kind required. The attacker\u0027s own workload is sufficient to trigger it.\nS:U - The bogus pointer arithmetic, out-of-bounds read, and any resulting fault all occur within the kernel\u0027s own security authority on the same host. No VM, IOMMU, or sandbox boundary is crossed.\nC:H - The type-confused `struct task_group *` is dereferenced at `offsetof(task_group, parent)` from a `list_head` address, which reads out of bounds past the end of the `cfs_rq` slab object into adjacent heap memory whose contents an attacker can influence via heap grooming. This is an unbounded kernel-memory read at an offset determined by struct layout rather than by any bounds check.\nI:H - This is a genuine type confusion \u2014 a `struct rq` list head reinterpreted as a member of `struct cfs_rq`, yielding a fabricated object pointer that is dereferenced \u2014 which upstream explicitly characterizes as \"potential memory corruption.\" Under differing struct layouts the fabricated `tg` pointer is an arbitrary non-pointer value, so the corrupted access is not confined to a benign read.\nA:H - The commit states the invalid conversion \"can cause a memory fault or access garbage data\"; dereferencing a wild `tg` pointer inside the scheduler with the rq lock held produces an oops or panic, and the slab-out-of-bounds read triggers a KASAN report that panics on hardened configurations. A fault in `__update_blocked_fair()` under the runqueue lock is unrecoverable for the affected CPU."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T11:55:20.805Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5cb300dcdd27e6a351ac02541e0231261c775852"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/000c9ee43928f2ce68a156dd40bab7616256f4dd"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9cc7f0018609f75a349e42e3aebc3b0e905ba775"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5741e4b9ef3567613b2351384f91d3f16e59986"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e1dd09df30ba86716cb2ffab97dc35195c01eb8f"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3b4035ddbfc8e4521f85569998a7569668cccf51"
}
],
"title": "sched/fair: Fix potential memory corruption in child_cfs_rq_on_list",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-21919",
"datePublished": "2025-04-01T15:40:54.075Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-12-29T08:45:45.787Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-08T08:40:56.687Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-21919",
"date": "2026-09-17",
"epss": "0.00228",
"percentile": "0.13778"
},
"microsoft_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-02-18T02:25:05.000Z",
"cve": "CVE-2025-21919",
"id": "msrc_CVE-2025-21919",
"initial_release_date": "2025-04-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"product_status:fixed": "5",
"product_status:known_affected": "5",
"source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "sched/fair: Fix potential memory corruption in child_cfs_rq_on_list",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2025/msrc_cve-2025-21919.json",
"version": "2"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-21919\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"published\":\"2025-04-01T16:15:22.557\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-07-14T13:17:26.870\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\\n\\nsched/fair: Fix potential memory corruption in child_cfs_rq_on_list\\n\\nchild_cfs_rq_on_list attempts to convert a \u0027prev\u0027 pointer to a cfs_rq.\\nThis \u0027prev\u0027 pointer can originate from struct rq\u0027s leaf_cfs_rq_list,\\nmaking the conversion invalid and potentially leading to memory\\ncorruption. Depending on the relative positions of leaf_cfs_rq_list and\\nthe task group (tg) pointer within the struct, this can cause a memory\\nfault or access garbage data.\\n\\nThe issue arises in list_add_leaf_cfs_rq, where both\\ncfs_rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list and rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list are added to the same\\nleaf list. Also, rq-\u003etmp_alone_branch can be set to rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list.\\n\\nThis adds a check `if (prev == \u0026rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list)` after the main\\nconditional in child_cfs_rq_on_list. This ensures that the container_of\\noperation will convert a correct cfs_rq struct.\\n\\nThis check is sufficient because only cfs_rqs on the same CPU are added\\nto the list, so verifying the \u0027prev\u0027 pointer against the current rq\u0027s list\\nhead is enough.\\n\\nFixes a potential memory corruption issue that due to current struct\\nlayout might not be manifesting as a crash but could lead to unpredictable\\nbehavior when the layout changes.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: sched/fair: Se corrige la posible corrupci\u00f3n de memoria en child_cfs_rq_on_list. child_cfs_rq_on_list intenta convertir un puntero \u0027prev\u0027 en un cfs_rq. Este puntero \u0027prev\u0027 puede originarse en leaf_cfs_rq_list de struct rq, invalidando la conversi\u00f3n y potencialmente provocando corrupci\u00f3n de memoria. Dependiendo de las posiciones relativas de leaf_cfs_rq_list y el puntero del grupo de tareas (tg) dentro de la estructura, esto puede causar un fallo de memoria o acceder a datos basura. El problema surge en list_add_leaf_cfs_rq, donde tanto cfs_rq-\u0026gt;leaf_cfs_rq_list como rq-\u0026gt;leaf_cfs_rq_list se a\u00f1aden a la misma lista de hojas. Adem\u00e1s, rq-\u0026gt;tmp_alone_branch puede establecerse en rq-\u0026gt;leaf_cfs_rq_list. Esto a\u00f1ade una comprobaci\u00f3n `if (prev == \u0026amp;rq-\u0026gt;leaf_cfs_rq_list)` despu\u00e9s de la condici\u00f3n principal en child_cfs_rq_on_list. Esto garantiza que la operaci\u00f3n container_of convierta una estructura cfs_rq correcta. Esta comprobaci\u00f3n es suficiente porque solo se a\u00f1aden a la lista las cfs_rqs en la misma CPU, por lo que basta con verificar el puntero `prev` con la cabecera de la lista de la rq actual. Corrige un posible problema de corrupci\u00f3n de memoria que, debido al dise\u00f1o actual de la estructura, podr\u00eda no manifestarse como un fallo, pero podr\u00eda provocar un comportamiento impredecible al cambiar el dise\u00f1o.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"Linux\",\"product\":\"Linux\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"programFiles\":[\"kernel/sched/fair.c\"],\"repo\":\"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984\",\"lessThan\":\"5cb300dcdd27e6a351ac02541e0231261c775852\",\"versionType\":\"git\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984\",\"lessThan\":\"000c9ee43928f2ce68a156dd40bab7616256f4dd\",\"versionType\":\"git\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984\",\"lessThan\":\"9cc7f0018609f75a349e42e3aebc3b0e905ba775\",\"versionType\":\"git\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984\",\"lessThan\":\"b5741e4b9ef3567613b2351384f91d3f16e59986\",\"versionType\":\"git\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984\",\"lessThan\":\"e1dd09df30ba86716cb2ffab97dc35195c01eb8f\",\"versionType\":\"git\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984\",\"lessThan\":\"3b4035ddbfc8e4521f85569998a7569668cccf51\",\"versionType\":\"git\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]},{\"vendor\":\"Linux\",\"product\":\"Linux\",\"defaultStatus\":\"affected\",\"programFiles\":[\"kernel/sched/fair.c\"],\"repo\":\"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"5.13\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"0\",\"lessThan\":\"5.13\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"unaffected\"},{\"version\":\"5.15.179\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"5.15.*\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"unaffected\"},{\"version\":\"6.1.131\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"6.1.*\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"unaffected\"},{\"version\":\"6.6.83\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"6.6.*\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"unaffected\"},{\"version\":\"6.12.19\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"6.12.*\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"unaffected\"},{\"version\":\"6.13.7\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"6.13.*\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"unaffected\"},{\"version\":\"6.14\",\"lessThanOrEqual\":\"*\",\"versionType\":\"original_commit_for_fix\",\"status\":\"unaffected\"}]}]},{\"source\":\"0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"Siemens\",\"product\":\"SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unknown\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"V3.1.6\",\"lessThan\":\"*\",\"versionType\":\"custom\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]},{\"vendor\":\"Siemens\",\"product\":\"SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unknown\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"V3.1.6\",\"lessThan\":\"*\",\"versionType\":\"custom\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]},{\"vendor\":\"Siemens\",\"product\":\"SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unknown\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"V3.1.6\",\"lessThan\":\"*\",\"versionType\":\"custom\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]},{\"vendor\":\"Siemens\",\"product\":\"SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unknown\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"V3.1.6\",\"lessThan\":\"*\",\"versionType\":\"custom\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]},{\"vendor\":\"Siemens\",\"product\":\"SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unknown\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"V3.1.6\",\"lessThan\":\"*\",\"versionType\":\"custom\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.8,\"impactScore\":5.9},{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.8,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2025-10-01T19:23:59.713530Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2025-21919\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"total\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-787\"}]},{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-787\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"5.13\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"5.15.179\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"92B01601-81F0-4810-B204-2E3CF4BA98F7\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"5.16\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.1.131\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"BA9C2DE3-D37C-46C6-8DCD-2EE509456E0B\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"6.2\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.6.83\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"7D9F642F-6E05-4926-B0FE-62F95B7266BC\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"6.7\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.12.19\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"32865E5C-8AE1-4D3D-A64D-299039694A88\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"6.13\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.13.7\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"842F5A44-3E71-4546-B4FD-43B0ACE3F32B\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"186716B6-2B66-4BD0-852E-D48E71C0C85F\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"0D3E781C-403A-498F-9DA9-ECEE50F41E75\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"66619FB8-0AAF-4166-B2CF-67B24143261D\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"D3D6550E-6679-4560-902D-AF52DCFE905B\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"45B90F6B-BEC7-4D4E-883A-9DBADE021750\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/000c9ee43928f2ce68a156dd40bab7616256f4dd\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3b4035ddbfc8e4521f85569998a7569668cccf51\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5cb300dcdd27e6a351ac02541e0231261c775852\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9cc7f0018609f75a349e42e3aebc3b0e905ba775\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5741e4b9ef3567613b2351384f91d3f16e59986\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e1dd09df30ba86716cb2ffab97dc35195c01eb8f\",\"source\":\"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00045.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-019113.html\",\"source\":\"0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e\"}]}}",
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-06-30T00:05:25+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2025-21919",
"id": "CVE-2025-21919",
"initial_release_date": "2025-04-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:fixed": "980",
"product_status:known_affected": "22",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "42",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: sched/fair: Fix potential memory corruption in child_cfs_rq_on_list",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-21919.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00045.html\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-11-03T19:39:11.086Z\"}}, {\"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Siemens\", \"product\": \"SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"V3.1.6\", \"lessThan\": \"*\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}, {\"vendor\": \"Siemens\", \"product\": \"SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"V3.1.6\", \"lessThan\": \"*\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}, {\"vendor\": \"Siemens\", \"product\": \"SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"V3.1.6\", \"lessThan\": \"*\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}, {\"vendor\": \"Siemens\", \"product\": \"SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"V3.1.6\", \"lessThan\": \"*\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}, {\"vendor\": \"Siemens\", \"product\": \"SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"V3.1.6\", \"lessThan\": \"*\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}], \"x_adpType\": \"supplier\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-019113.html\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e\", \"shortName\": \"siemens-SADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-08T08:40:56.687Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.8, \"attackVector\": \"LOCAL\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-21919\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-10-01T19:23:59.713530Z\"}}}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-787\", \"description\": \"CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-10-01T14:37:43.464Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"sched/fair: Fix potential memory corruption in child_cfs_rq_on_list\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.8, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"AV:L - The defect is in core CFS scheduler code (`kernel/sched/fair.c`) reached through ordinary local scheduling activity, cgroup manipulation, and CFS-bandwidth unthrottling; there is no network-facing input path. Exploitation requires the ability to run code on the machine.\\nAC:L - The invalid `container_of()` executes deterministically every time the examined cfs_rq is first on `rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list` or `rq-\u003etmp_alone_branch` is at its reset value, which is the normal steady state \\u2014 no race to win and no unusual precondition. An attacker reliably drives it by creating/loading a cgroup in a delegated subtree and letting the load balancer or bandwidth timer run.\\nPR:L - No capability check, credential test, or privileged gate exists on `__update_blocked_fair()` or `tg_unthrottle_up()`; an ordinary unprivileged user reaches both via normal task execution and via cgroup v2 cpu/cpu.max controls in a systemd- or container-delegated subtree. Real root in the init namespace is not needed.\\nUI:N - The vulnerable path runs from the periodic load-balance softirq and the CFS bandwidth timer, with no victim action of any kind required. The attacker\u0027s own workload is sufficient to trigger it.\\nS:U - The bogus pointer arithmetic, out-of-bounds read, and any resulting fault all occur within the kernel\u0027s own security authority on the same host. No VM, IOMMU, or sandbox boundary is crossed.\\nC:H - The type-confused `struct task_group *` is dereferenced at `offsetof(task_group, parent)` from a `list_head` address, which reads out of bounds past the end of the `cfs_rq` slab object into adjacent heap memory whose contents an attacker can influence via heap grooming. This is an unbounded kernel-memory read at an offset determined by struct layout rather than by any bounds check.\\nI:H - This is a genuine type confusion \\u2014 a `struct rq` list head reinterpreted as a member of `struct cfs_rq`, yielding a fabricated object pointer that is dereferenced \\u2014 which upstream explicitly characterizes as \\\"potential memory corruption.\\\" Under differing struct layouts the fabricated `tg` pointer is an arbitrary non-pointer value, so the corrupted access is not confined to a benign read.\\nA:H - The commit states the invalid conversion \\\"can cause a memory fault or access garbage data\\\"; dereferencing a wild `tg` pointer inside the scheduler with the rq lock held produces an oops or panic, and the slab-out-of-bounds read triggers a KASAN report that panics on hardened configurations. A fault in `__update_blocked_fair()` under the runqueue lock is unrecoverable for the affected CPU.\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"repo\": \"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git\", \"vendor\": \"Linux\", \"product\": \"Linux\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984\", \"lessThan\": \"5cb300dcdd27e6a351ac02541e0231261c775852\", \"versionType\": \"git\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984\", \"lessThan\": \"000c9ee43928f2ce68a156dd40bab7616256f4dd\", \"versionType\": \"git\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984\", \"lessThan\": \"9cc7f0018609f75a349e42e3aebc3b0e905ba775\", \"versionType\": \"git\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984\", \"lessThan\": \"b5741e4b9ef3567613b2351384f91d3f16e59986\", \"versionType\": \"git\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984\", \"lessThan\": \"e1dd09df30ba86716cb2ffab97dc35195c01eb8f\", \"versionType\": \"git\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984\", \"lessThan\": \"3b4035ddbfc8e4521f85569998a7569668cccf51\", \"versionType\": \"git\"}], \"programFiles\": [\"kernel/sched/fair.c\"], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}, {\"repo\": \"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git\", \"vendor\": \"Linux\", \"product\": \"Linux\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"5.13\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"5.13\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"5.15.179\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"5.15.*\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"6.1.131\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"6.1.*\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"6.6.83\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"6.6.*\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"6.12.19\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"6.12.*\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"6.13.7\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"6.13.*\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"6.14\", \"versionType\": \"original_commit_for_fix\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"*\"}], \"programFiles\": [\"kernel/sched/fair.c\"], \"defaultStatus\": \"affected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5cb300dcdd27e6a351ac02541e0231261c775852\"}, {\"url\": \"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/000c9ee43928f2ce68a156dd40bab7616256f4dd\"}, {\"url\": \"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9cc7f0018609f75a349e42e3aebc3b0e905ba775\"}, {\"url\": \"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5741e4b9ef3567613b2351384f91d3f16e59986\"}, {\"url\": \"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e1dd09df30ba86716cb2ffab97dc35195c01eb8f\"}, {\"url\": \"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3b4035ddbfc8e4521f85569998a7569668cccf51\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"bippy-1.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\\n\\nsched/fair: Fix potential memory corruption in child_cfs_rq_on_list\\n\\nchild_cfs_rq_on_list attempts to convert a \u0027prev\u0027 pointer to a cfs_rq.\\nThis \u0027prev\u0027 pointer can originate from struct rq\u0027s leaf_cfs_rq_list,\\nmaking the conversion invalid and potentially leading to memory\\ncorruption. Depending on the relative positions of leaf_cfs_rq_list and\\nthe task group (tg) pointer within the struct, this can cause a memory\\nfault or access garbage data.\\n\\nThe issue arises in list_add_leaf_cfs_rq, where both\\ncfs_rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list and rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list are added to the same\\nleaf list. Also, rq-\u003etmp_alone_branch can be set to rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list.\\n\\nThis adds a check `if (prev == \u0026rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list)` after the main\\nconditional in child_cfs_rq_on_list. This ensures that the container_of\\noperation will convert a correct cfs_rq struct.\\n\\nThis check is sufficient because only cfs_rqs on the same CPU are added\\nto the list, so verifying the \u0027prev\u0027 pointer against the current rq\u0027s list\\nhead is enough.\\n\\nFixes a potential memory corruption issue that due to current struct\\nlayout might not be manifesting as a crash but could lead to unpredictable\\nbehavior when the layout changes.\"}], \"cpeApplicability\": [{\"nodes\": [{\"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"5.15.179\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"5.13\"}, {\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"6.1.131\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"5.13\"}, {\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"6.6.83\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"5.13\"}, {\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"6.12.19\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"5.13\"}, {\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"6.13.7\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"5.13\"}, {\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"6.14\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"5.13\"}], \"operator\": \"OR\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\", \"shortName\": \"Linux\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-05T11:55:20.805Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-21919\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-08T08:40:56.687Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-12-29T08:45:45.787Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-04-01T15:40:54.075Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"Linux\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-02-26 - Updated: 2026-02-26
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits VMware. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Platform Services pour Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.3.5 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Tanzu Hub versions antérieures à 10.3.5 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Data Intelligence | Tanzu pour Postgres versions 16.x antérieures à 16.12.0 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Data Intelligence | Tanzu pour Postgres versions antérieures à 4.3.2 sur Kubernetes | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Data Intelligence | Tanzu pour Postgres versions 18.x antérieures à 18.2.0 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Stemcells (Ubuntu Noble) versions antérieures à 1.238.x | ||
| VMware | Workstation | Workstation versions antérieures à 25H2u1 | ||
| VMware | Fusion | Fusion versions antérieures à 25H2u1 sur MacOS | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Stemcells (Ubuntu Jammy) versions antérieures à 1.1065.x | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Data Intelligence | Tanzu pour Postgres versions 15.x antérieures à 15.16.0 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Stemcells (Windows) versions antérieures à 2019.95.x | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Data Intelligence | Tanzu pour Postgres versions 17.x antérieures à 17.8.0 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Data Intelligence | Tanzu pour Postgres versions antérieures à 14.21.0 |
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Platform Services pour Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.3.5",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Hub versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.3.5",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu pour Postgres versions 16.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 16.12.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Data Intelligence",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu pour Postgres versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.3.2 sur Kubernetes",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Data Intelligence",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu pour Postgres versions 18.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 18.2.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Data Intelligence",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Stemcells (Ubuntu Noble) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.238.x",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Workstation versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 25H2u1",
"product": {
"name": "Workstation",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Fusion versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 25H2u1 sur MacOS",
"product": {
"name": "Fusion",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Stemcells (Ubuntu Jammy) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.1065.x",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu pour Postgres versions 15.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 15.16.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Data Intelligence",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Stemcells (Windows) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 2019.95.x",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu pour Postgres versions 17.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 17.8.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Data Intelligence",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu pour Postgres versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 14.21.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Data Intelligence",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2019-25013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-25013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-9937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-4235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-4235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-35252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2005-0602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2005-0602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-7006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38711",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38711"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-11168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-11168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-38604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2001-1268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2001-1268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-8141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-8141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-10148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-25724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-39537",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39537"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-47008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-47008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-0682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38444",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38444"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-28164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-28164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-47629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-47629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-29562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-30086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-30086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-25586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-20052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-20052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-45582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-45582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-10140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-10140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-1752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-49794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-47007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-47007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-36632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-36632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-25433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38521",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38521"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-24970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-38476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-45078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-7696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-7696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-47695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-47695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-30774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-30774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-13176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-13176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-9840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-9840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-13009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-13009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-2624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-2624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2008-0888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-0888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-13232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-13232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-2654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-2654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-25584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38459",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38459"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-44840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-44840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-64718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50444",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50444"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-2708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-2708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-0692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-10878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-47696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-47696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-51744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-51744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38537",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38537"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-10966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-2981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-2981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-22576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-22576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-31133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-35205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-3418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-3418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-11053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-11053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-7264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-64505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-2656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-2656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4517",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4517"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-9843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-9843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38513",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38513"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-8139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-8139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-28162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-28162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0530",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0530"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-13978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-13978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-64506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-2626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-2626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-10029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-36227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-36770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-36976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-25032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-25032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-3360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-64720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-30571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-30571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38542",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38542"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-10543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1377",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1377"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38530",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38530"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46394",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46394"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-40745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-9636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-9636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2521",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2521"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-25435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-65018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-65018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-37434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-32256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38326",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38326"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38430",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38430"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3521",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3521"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-33601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-33601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38528",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38528"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-9076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34459",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34459"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-49795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-9913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-9913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-0694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2001-1269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2001-1269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-2583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-2583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-29390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-45768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-45768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38392",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38392"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-60753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27536",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27536"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-67735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-67735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-11164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-11164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-26519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-26519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-7500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-32292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-10041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-10041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-34903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-20696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-20696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38577",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38577"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-19726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-19726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-47010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-47010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38348",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38348"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-22916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-22916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-33070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-33070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-10911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38429",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38429"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-30775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-30775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-37369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-37369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-55549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-55549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-25588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-41175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-41175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-26280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-25193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2012-0880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-0880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-9996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-9996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-7697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-7697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-24855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-0689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-0689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-8140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-8140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-47011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-47011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-37972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1000035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1000035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3326",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3326"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-40403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-30560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-30560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38448",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38448"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-3606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-3606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38377",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38377"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-25434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-13410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-13410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-60876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-24928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-35206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-38533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38443",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38443"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-36660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-36660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-25585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38439",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38439"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-41254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-41254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-3198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-27645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-27645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-49796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-34526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-34526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-16599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-16599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-7501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-47673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-47673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-0340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-0340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-27618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38427",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38427"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-2640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-2640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-43396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-42366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-64702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-43618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39711",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39711"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-26488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-18384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-18384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-11023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38361",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-23916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-9844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-9844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25646"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-02-26T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-02-26T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-02-26T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits VMware. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et un contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits VMware",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37096",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37096"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37092",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37092"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37102",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37102"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37078",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37078"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37109",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37109"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37087",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37087"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37090",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37090"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37077",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37077"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37098",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37098"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37079",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37079"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37101",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37101"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37104",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37104"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37080",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37080"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37097",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37097"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37083",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37083"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37086",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37086"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37082",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37082"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37100",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37100"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37099",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37099"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37081",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37081"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37089",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37089"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37076",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37076"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37088",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37088"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36986",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36986"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware DSA-2025-27",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37103"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37084",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37084"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37110",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37110"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37093",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37093"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37085",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37085"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37095",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37095"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-02-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37094",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37094"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-07-15 - Updated: 2026-07-15
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siemens | SIMATIC | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2026-54429 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | Desigo CC versions antérieures à 9.0.1 | ||
| Siemens | SIMATIC | SIMATIC S7-1500 versions supérieures ou égales à3.1.6 pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2021-41617, CVE-2023-28531, CVE-2023-51384, CVE-2023-52927, CVE-2024-26783, CVE-2024-27056, CVE-2024-28956, CVE-2024-36903, CVE-2024-36927, CVE-2024-42079, CVE-2024-46786, CVE-2024-47736, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-49968, CVE-2024-49994, CVE-2024-49998, CVE-2024-50014, CVE-2024-50063, CVE-2024-50164, CVE-2024-50298, CVE-2024-53124, CVE-2024-53170, CVE-2024-54458, CVE-2024-56631, CVE-2024-56703, CVE-2024-56719, CVE-2024-57917, CVE-2024-57924, CVE-2024-57973, CVE-2024-57977, CVE-2024-57979, CVE-2024-58011, CVE-2024-58016, CVE-2024-58020, CVE-2024-58056, CVE-2024-58058, CVE-2024-58061, CVE-2024-58086, CVE-2025-21645, CVE-2025-21648, CVE-2025-21655, CVE-2025-21676, CVE-2025-21682, CVE-2025-21702, CVE-2025-21705, CVE-2025-21706, CVE-2025-21707, CVE-2025-21718, CVE-2025-21731, CVE-2025-21745, CVE-2025-21758, CVE-2025-21760, CVE-2025-21764, CVE-2025-21765, CVE-2025-21780, CVE-2025-21795, CVE-2025-21796, CVE-2025-21802, CVE-2025-21814, CVE-2025-21846, CVE-2025-21853, CVE-2025-21861, CVE-2025-21864, CVE-2025-21867, CVE-2025-21875, CVE-2025-21887, CVE-2025-21913, CVE-2025-21919, CVE-2025-21925, CVE-2025-21926, CVE-2025-21938, CVE-2025-21959, CVE-2025-21999, CVE-2025-22005, CVE-2025-22015, CVE-2025-22055, CVE-2025-22056, CVE-2025-22060, CVE-2025-22083, CVE-2025-22090, CVE-2025-22095, CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-22111, CVE-2025-22121, CVE-2025-23136, CVE-2025-23143, CVE-2025-37785, CVE-2025-37909, CVE-2025-37917, CVE-2025-37945, CVE-2025-37959, CVE-2025-37964, CVE-2025-37972, CVE-2025-37980, CVE-2025-38125, CVE-2025-38162, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38201, CVE-2025-38232, CVE-2025-38322, CVE-2025-38591, CVE-2025-38614, CVE-2025-38681, CVE-2025-38704, CVE-2025-38721, CVE-2025-38725, CVE-2025-38727, CVE-2025-38732, CVE-2025-38736, CVE-2025-39681, CVE-2025-39691, CVE-2025-39721, CVE-2025-39748, CVE-2025-39756, CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-39770, CVE-2025-39773, CVE-2025-39782, CVE-2025-39795, CVE-2025-39826, CVE-2025-39827, CVE-2025-39845, CVE-2025-39866, CVE-2025-39871, CVE-2025-39931, CVE-2025-39953, CVE-2025-39955, CVE-2025-39964, CVE-2025-39977, CVE-2025-39978, CVE-2025-39980, CVE-2025-40022, CVE-2025-40070, CVE-2025-40078, CVE-2025-40080, CVE-2025-40105, CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40149, CVE-2025-40219, CVE-2025-40261, CVE-2025-40300, CVE-2025-61984, CVE-2025-61985, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025-68261, CVE-2025-68264, CVE-2025-68265, CVE-2025-68266, CVE-2025-68291, CVE-2025-68337, CVE-2025-68349, CVE-2025-68363, CVE-2025-68371, CVE-2025-68724, CVE-2025-68725, CVE-2025-68742, CVE-2025-68764, CVE-2025-68773, CVE-2025-68776, CVE-2025-68782, CVE-2025-68787, CVE-2025-68788, CVE-2025-68798, CVE-2025-68803, CVE-2025-68814, CVE-2025-68816, CVE-2025-68818, CVE-2025-68820, CVE-2025-71064, CVE-2025-71075, CVE-2025-71079, CVE-2025-71085, CVE-2025-71086, CVE-2025-71088, CVE-2025-71095, CVE-2025-71097, CVE-2025-71098, CVE-2025-71104, CVE-2025-71112, CVE-2025-71113, CVE-2025-71114, CVE-2025-71120, CVE-2025-71123, CVE-2025-71131, CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71162, CVE-2025-71163, CVE-2025-71185, CVE-2025-71186, CVE-2025-71189, CVE-2025-71190, CVE-2025-71191, CVE-2025-71197, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2026-3497, CVE-2026-22977, CVE-2026-22979, CVE-2026-22980, CVE-2026-22982, CVE-2026-22992, CVE-2026-22994, CVE-2026-23003, CVE-2026-23005, CVE-2026-23010, CVE-2026-23011, CVE-2026-23019, CVE-2026-23026, CVE-2026-23038, CVE-2026-23054, CVE-2026-23060, CVE-2026-23083, CVE-2026-23084, CVE-2026-23086, CVE-2026-23087, CVE-2026-23095, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23103, CVE-2026-23110, CVE-2026-23111, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23204, CVE-2026-23231, CVE-2026-23242, CVE-2026-23243, CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23273, CVE-2026-23274, CVE-2026-23277, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23351, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23378, CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23422, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23450, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23455, CVE-2026-23456, CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475, CVE-2026-27135, CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31402, CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31411, CVE-2026-31414, CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31418, CVE-2026-31421, CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31431, CVE-2026-31441, CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31448, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31494, CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31503, CVE-2026-31504, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31533, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31563, CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31649, CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31669, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31682, CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-40355, CVE-2026-41989, CVE-2026-43011, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43033, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43038, CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43057, CVE-2026-43284, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46300 et CVE-2026-46333. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | Desigo CC toutes versions | ||
| Siemens | N/A | Desigo CC toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-15467 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2026-54429",
"product": {
"name": "SIMATIC",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "Desigo CC versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 9.0.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-1500 versions sup\u00e9rieures ou \u00e9gales \u00e03.1.6 pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2021-41617, CVE-2023-28531, CVE-2023-51384, CVE-2023-52927, CVE-2024-26783, CVE-2024-27056, CVE-2024-28956, CVE-2024-36903, CVE-2024-36927, CVE-2024-42079, CVE-2024-46786, CVE-2024-47736, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-49968, CVE-2024-49994, CVE-2024-49998, CVE-2024-50014, CVE-2024-50063, CVE-2024-50164, CVE-2024-50298, CVE-2024-53124, CVE-2024-53170, CVE-2024-54458, CVE-2024-56631, CVE-2024-56703, CVE-2024-56719, CVE-2024-57917, CVE-2024-57924, CVE-2024-57973, CVE-2024-57977, CVE-2024-57979, CVE-2024-58011, CVE-2024-58016, CVE-2024-58020, CVE-2024-58056, CVE-2024-58058, CVE-2024-58061, CVE-2024-58086, CVE-2025-21645, CVE-2025-21648, CVE-2025-21655, CVE-2025-21676, CVE-2025-21682, CVE-2025-21702, CVE-2025-21705, CVE-2025-21706, CVE-2025-21707, CVE-2025-21718, CVE-2025-21731, CVE-2025-21745, CVE-2025-21758, CVE-2025-21760, CVE-2025-21764, CVE-2025-21765, CVE-2025-21780, CVE-2025-21795, CVE-2025-21796, CVE-2025-21802, CVE-2025-21814, CVE-2025-21846, CVE-2025-21853, CVE-2025-21861, CVE-2025-21864, CVE-2025-21867, CVE-2025-21875, CVE-2025-21887, CVE-2025-21913, CVE-2025-21919, CVE-2025-21925, CVE-2025-21926, CVE-2025-21938, CVE-2025-21959, CVE-2025-21999, CVE-2025-22005, CVE-2025-22015, CVE-2025-22055, CVE-2025-22056, CVE-2025-22060, CVE-2025-22083, CVE-2025-22090, CVE-2025-22095, CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-22111, CVE-2025-22121, CVE-2025-23136, CVE-2025-23143, CVE-2025-37785, CVE-2025-37909, CVE-2025-37917, CVE-2025-37945, CVE-2025-37959, CVE-2025-37964, CVE-2025-37972, CVE-2025-37980, CVE-2025-38125, CVE-2025-38162, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38201, CVE-2025-38232, CVE-2025-38322, CVE-2025-38591, CVE-2025-38614, CVE-2025-38681, CVE-2025-38704, CVE-2025-38721, CVE-2025-38725, CVE-2025-38727, CVE-2025-38732, CVE-2025-38736, CVE-2025-39681, CVE-2025-39691, CVE-2025-39721, CVE-2025-39748, CVE-2025-39756, CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-39770, CVE-2025-39773, CVE-2025-39782, CVE-2025-39795, CVE-2025-39826, CVE-2025-39827, CVE-2025-39845, CVE-2025-39866, CVE-2025-39871, CVE-2025-39931, CVE-2025-39953, CVE-2025-39955, CVE-2025-39964, CVE-2025-39977, CVE-2025-39978, CVE-2025-39980, CVE-2025-40022, CVE-2025-40070, CVE-2025-40078, CVE-2025-40080, CVE-2025-40105, CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40149, CVE-2025-40219, CVE-2025-40261, CVE-2025-40300, CVE-2025-61984, CVE-2025-61985, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025-68261, CVE-2025-68264, CVE-2025-68265, CVE-2025-68266, CVE-2025-68291, CVE-2025-68337, CVE-2025-68349, CVE-2025-68363, CVE-2025-68371, CVE-2025-68724, CVE-2025-68725, CVE-2025-68742, CVE-2025-68764, CVE-2025-68773, CVE-2025-68776, CVE-2025-68782, CVE-2025-68787, CVE-2025-68788, CVE-2025-68798, CVE-2025-68803, CVE-2025-68814, CVE-2025-68816, CVE-2025-68818, CVE-2025-68820, CVE-2025-71064, CVE-2025-71075, CVE-2025-71079, CVE-2025-71085, CVE-2025-71086, CVE-2025-71088, CVE-2025-71095, CVE-2025-71097, CVE-2025-71098, CVE-2025-71104, CVE-2025-71112, CVE-2025-71113, CVE-2025-71114, CVE-2025-71120, CVE-2025-71123, CVE-2025-71131, CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71162, CVE-2025-71163, CVE-2025-71185, CVE-2025-71186, CVE-2025-71189, CVE-2025-71190, CVE-2025-71191, CVE-2025-71197, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2026-3497, CVE-2026-22977, CVE-2026-22979, CVE-2026-22980, CVE-2026-22982, CVE-2026-22992, CVE-2026-22994, CVE-2026-23003, CVE-2026-23005, CVE-2026-23010, CVE-2026-23011, CVE-2026-23019, CVE-2026-23026, CVE-2026-23038, CVE-2026-23054, CVE-2026-23060, CVE-2026-23083, CVE-2026-23084, CVE-2026-23086, CVE-2026-23087, CVE-2026-23095, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23103, CVE-2026-23110, CVE-2026-23111, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23204, CVE-2026-23231, CVE-2026-23242, CVE-2026-23243, CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23273, CVE-2026-23274, CVE-2026-23277, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23351, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23378, CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23422, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23450, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23455, CVE-2026-23456, CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475, CVE-2026-27135, CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31402, CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31411, CVE-2026-31414, CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31418, CVE-2026-31421, CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31431, CVE-2026-31441, CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31448, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31494, CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31503, CVE-2026-31504, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31533, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31563, CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31649, CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31669, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31682, CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-40355, CVE-2026-41989, CVE-2026-43011, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43033, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43038, CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43057, CVE-2026-43284, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46300 et CVE-2026-46333.",
"product": {
"name": "SIMATIC",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "Desigo CC toutes versions",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "Desigo CC toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-15467",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23454",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23454"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31448",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31448"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-40355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-40355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23439",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23439"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31431",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31431"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21655",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21655"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-41989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31427",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31427"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31423",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31423"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31521",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31521"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23392",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23392"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-54429",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54429"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-41617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-07-15T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-07-15T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-0880",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-07-15T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits Siemens",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-07-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-828211",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-828211.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-07-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-019113",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-019113.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-07-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-734552",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-734552.html"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2025-21919
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-04-01 16:15 - Updated: 2026-07-14 13:177.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/000c9ee43928f2ce68a156dd40bab7616256f4dd | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3b4035ddbfc8e4521f85569998a7569668cccf51 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5cb300dcdd27e6a351ac02541e0231261c775852 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9cc7f0018609f75a349e42e3aebc3b0e905ba775 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5741e4b9ef3567613b2351384f91d3f16e59986 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e1dd09df30ba86716cb2ffab97dc35195c01eb8f | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00045.html | ||
| 0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e | https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-019113.html |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.14 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.14 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.14 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.14 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.14 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"kernel/sched/fair.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5cb300dcdd27e6a351ac02541e0231261c775852",
"status": "affected",
"version": "fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "000c9ee43928f2ce68a156dd40bab7616256f4dd",
"status": "affected",
"version": "fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "9cc7f0018609f75a349e42e3aebc3b0e905ba775",
"status": "affected",
"version": "fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "b5741e4b9ef3567613b2351384f91d3f16e59986",
"status": "affected",
"version": "fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "e1dd09df30ba86716cb2ffab97dc35195c01eb8f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3b4035ddbfc8e4521f85569998a7569668cccf51",
"status": "affected",
"version": "fdaba61ef8a268d4136d0a113d153f7a89eb9984",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"kernel/sched/fair.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.13"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.13",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.179",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.131",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.83",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.19",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.13.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.13.7",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.14",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
},
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "V3.1.6",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "92B01601-81F0-4810-B204-2E3CF4BA98F7",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.179",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "BA9C2DE3-D37C-46C6-8DCD-2EE509456E0B",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.131",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7D9F642F-6E05-4926-B0FE-62F95B7266BC",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.83",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "32865E5C-8AE1-4D3D-A64D-299039694A88",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.19",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "842F5A44-3E71-4546-B4FD-43B0ACE3F32B",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.13.7",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "186716B6-2B66-4BD0-852E-D48E71C0C85F",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0D3E781C-403A-498F-9DA9-ECEE50F41E75",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "66619FB8-0AAF-4166-B2CF-67B24143261D",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "D3D6550E-6679-4560-902D-AF52DCFE905B",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.14:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "45B90F6B-BEC7-4D4E-883A-9DBADE021750",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsched/fair: Fix potential memory corruption in child_cfs_rq_on_list\n\nchild_cfs_rq_on_list attempts to convert a \u0027prev\u0027 pointer to a cfs_rq.\nThis \u0027prev\u0027 pointer can originate from struct rq\u0027s leaf_cfs_rq_list,\nmaking the conversion invalid and potentially leading to memory\ncorruption. Depending on the relative positions of leaf_cfs_rq_list and\nthe task group (tg) pointer within the struct, this can cause a memory\nfault or access garbage data.\n\nThe issue arises in list_add_leaf_cfs_rq, where both\ncfs_rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list and rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list are added to the same\nleaf list. Also, rq-\u003etmp_alone_branch can be set to rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list.\n\nThis adds a check `if (prev == \u0026rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list)` after the main\nconditional in child_cfs_rq_on_list. This ensures that the container_of\noperation will convert a correct cfs_rq struct.\n\nThis check is sufficient because only cfs_rqs on the same CPU are added\nto the list, so verifying the \u0027prev\u0027 pointer against the current rq\u0027s list\nhead is enough.\n\nFixes a potential memory corruption issue that due to current struct\nlayout might not be manifesting as a crash but could lead to unpredictable\nbehavior when the layout changes."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: sched/fair: Se corrige la posible corrupci\u00f3n de memoria en child_cfs_rq_on_list. child_cfs_rq_on_list intenta convertir un puntero \u0027prev\u0027 en un cfs_rq. Este puntero \u0027prev\u0027 puede originarse en leaf_cfs_rq_list de struct rq, invalidando la conversi\u00f3n y potencialmente provocando corrupci\u00f3n de memoria. Dependiendo de las posiciones relativas de leaf_cfs_rq_list y el puntero del grupo de tareas (tg) dentro de la estructura, esto puede causar un fallo de memoria o acceder a datos basura. El problema surge en list_add_leaf_cfs_rq, donde tanto cfs_rq-\u0026gt;leaf_cfs_rq_list como rq-\u0026gt;leaf_cfs_rq_list se a\u00f1aden a la misma lista de hojas. Adem\u00e1s, rq-\u0026gt;tmp_alone_branch puede establecerse en rq-\u0026gt;leaf_cfs_rq_list. Esto a\u00f1ade una comprobaci\u00f3n `if (prev == \u0026amp;rq-\u0026gt;leaf_cfs_rq_list)` despu\u00e9s de la condici\u00f3n principal en child_cfs_rq_on_list. Esto garantiza que la operaci\u00f3n container_of convierta una estructura cfs_rq correcta. Esta comprobaci\u00f3n es suficiente porque solo se a\u00f1aden a la lista las cfs_rqs en la misma CPU, por lo que basta con verificar el puntero `prev` con la cabecera de la lista de la rq actual. Corrige un posible problema de corrupci\u00f3n de memoria que, debido al dise\u00f1o actual de la estructura, podr\u00eda no manifestarse como un fallo, pero podr\u00eda provocar un comportamiento impredecible al cambiar el dise\u00f1o."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-21919",
"lastModified": "2026-07-14T13:17:26.870",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-21919",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-01T19:23:59.713530Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2025-04-01T16:15:22.557",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/000c9ee43928f2ce68a156dd40bab7616256f4dd"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3b4035ddbfc8e4521f85569998a7569668cccf51"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5cb300dcdd27e6a351ac02541e0231261c775852"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9cc7f0018609f75a349e42e3aebc3b0e905ba775"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5741e4b9ef3567613b2351384f91d3f16e59986"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e1dd09df30ba86716cb2ffab97dc35195c01eb8f"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00045.html"
},
{
"source": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-019113.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-787"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-787"
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
GHSA-C924-P67M-48HP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-01 18:30 – Updated: 2026-07-14 15:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched/fair: Fix potential memory corruption in child_cfs_rq_on_list
child_cfs_rq_on_list attempts to convert a 'prev' pointer to a cfs_rq. This 'prev' pointer can originate from struct rq's leaf_cfs_rq_list, making the conversion invalid and potentially leading to memory corruption. Depending on the relative positions of leaf_cfs_rq_list and the task group (tg) pointer within the struct, this can cause a memory fault or access garbage data.
The issue arises in list_add_leaf_cfs_rq, where both cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list and rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list are added to the same leaf list. Also, rq->tmp_alone_branch can be set to rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list.
This adds a check if (prev == &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list) after the main
conditional in child_cfs_rq_on_list. This ensures that the container_of
operation will convert a correct cfs_rq struct.
This check is sufficient because only cfs_rqs on the same CPU are added to the list, so verifying the 'prev' pointer against the current rq's list head is enough.
Fixes a potential memory corruption issue that due to current struct layout might not be manifesting as a crash but could lead to unpredictable behavior when the layout changes.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-21919"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-01T16:15:22Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsched/fair: Fix potential memory corruption in child_cfs_rq_on_list\n\nchild_cfs_rq_on_list attempts to convert a \u0027prev\u0027 pointer to a cfs_rq.\nThis \u0027prev\u0027 pointer can originate from struct rq\u0027s leaf_cfs_rq_list,\nmaking the conversion invalid and potentially leading to memory\ncorruption. Depending on the relative positions of leaf_cfs_rq_list and\nthe task group (tg) pointer within the struct, this can cause a memory\nfault or access garbage data.\n\nThe issue arises in list_add_leaf_cfs_rq, where both\ncfs_rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list and rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list are added to the same\nleaf list. Also, rq-\u003etmp_alone_branch can be set to rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list.\n\nThis adds a check `if (prev == \u0026rq-\u003eleaf_cfs_rq_list)` after the main\nconditional in child_cfs_rq_on_list. This ensures that the container_of\noperation will convert a correct cfs_rq struct.\n\nThis check is sufficient because only cfs_rqs on the same CPU are added\nto the list, so verifying the \u0027prev\u0027 pointer against the current rq\u0027s list\nhead is enough.\n\nFixes a potential memory corruption issue that due to current struct\nlayout might not be manifesting as a crash but could lead to unpredictable\nbehavior when the layout changes.",
"id": "GHSA-c924-p67m-48hp",
"modified": "2026-07-14T15:31:20Z",
"published": "2025-04-01T18:30:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21919"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-019113.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/000c9ee43928f2ce68a156dd40bab7616256f4dd"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3b4035ddbfc8e4521f85569998a7569668cccf51"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5cb300dcdd27e6a351ac02541e0231261c775852"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9cc7f0018609f75a349e42e3aebc3b0e905ba775"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5741e4b9ef3567613b2351384f91d3f16e59986"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e1dd09df30ba86716cb2ffab97dc35195c01eb8f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00045.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
ICSA-26-209-04
Vulnerability from csaf_cisa - Published: 2026-07-14 00:00 - Updated: 2026-07-28 06:00In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/fair: Fix potential memory corruption in child_cfs_rq_on_list child_cfs_rq_on_list attempts to convert a 'prev' pointer to a cfs_rq. This 'prev' pointer can originate from struct rq's leaf_cfs_rq_list, making the conversion invalid and potentially leading to memory corruption. Depending on the relative positions of leaf_cfs_rq_list and the task group (tg) pointer within the struct, this can cause a memory fault or access garbage data. The issue arises in list_add_leaf_cfs_rq, where both cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list and rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list are added to the same leaf list. Also, rq->tmp_alone_branch can be set to rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list. This adds a check `if (prev == &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list)` after the main conditional in child_cfs_rq_on_list. This ensures that the container_of operation will convert a correct cfs_rq struct. This check is sufficient because only cfs_rqs on the same CPU are added to the list, so verifying the 'prev' pointer against the current rq's list head is enough. Fixes a potential memory corruption issue that due to current struct layout might not be manifesting as a crash but could lead to unpredictable behavior when the layout changes.
MSRC_CVE-2025-21919
Vulnerability from csaf_microsoft - Published: 2025-04-02 00:00 - Updated: 2026-02-18 02:25oesa-2025-1594
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler
The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: test for not too small csum_start in virtio_net_hdr_to_skb()
syzbot was able to trigger this warning [1], after injecting a malicious packet through af_packet, setting skb->csum_start and thus the transport header to an incorrect value.
We can at least make sure the transport header is after the end of the network header (with a estimated minimal size).
[1] [ 67.873027] skb len=4096 headroom=16 headlen=14 tailroom=0 mac=(-1,-1) mac_len=0 net=(16,-6) trans=10 shinfo(txflags=0 nr_frags=1 gso(size=0 type=0 segs=0)) csum(0xa start=10 offset=0 ip_summed=3 complete_sw=0 valid=0 level=0) hash(0x0 sw=0 l4=0) proto=0x0800 pkttype=0 iif=0 priority=0x0 mark=0x0 alloc_cpu=10 vlan_all=0x0 encapsulation=0 inner(proto=0x0000, mac=0, net=0, trans=0) [ 67.877172] dev name=veth0_vlan feat=0x000061164fdd09e9 [ 67.877764] sk family=17 type=3 proto=0 [ 67.878279] skb linear: 00000000: 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 0f 00 00 00 08 00 [ 67.879128] skb frag: 00000000: 0e 00 07 00 00 00 28 00 08 80 1c 00 04 00 00 02 [ 67.879877] skb frag: 00000010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 67.880647] skb frag: 00000020: 00 00 02 00 00 00 08 00 1b 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 67.881156] skb frag: 00000030: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 67.881753] skb frag: 00000040: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 67.882173] skb frag: 00000050: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 67.882790] skb frag: 00000060: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 67.883171] skb frag: 00000070: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 67.883733] skb frag: 00000080: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 67.884206] skb frag: 00000090: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 69 70 76 6c 61 6e [ 67.884704] skb frag: 000000a0: 31 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2b 00 00 00 00 00 [ 67.885139] skb frag: 000000b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 67.885677] skb frag: 000000c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 67.886042] skb frag: 000000d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 67.886408] skb frag: 000000e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 67.887020] skb frag: 000000f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 67.887384] skb frag: 00000100: 00 00 [ 67.887878] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 67.887908] offset (-6) >= skb_headlen() (14) [ 67.888445] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 2088 at net/core/dev.c:3332 skb_checksum_help (net/core/dev.c:3332 (discriminator 2)) [ 67.889353] Modules linked in: macsec macvtap macvlan hsr wireguard curve25519_x86_64 libcurve25519_generic libchacha20poly1305 chacha_x86_64 libchacha poly1305_x86_64 dummy bridge sr_mod cdrom evdev pcspkr i2c_piix4 9pnet_virtio 9p 9pnet netfs [ 67.890111] CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 2088 Comm: b363492833 Not tainted 6.11.0-virtme #1011 [ 67.890183] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 [ 67.890309] RIP: 0010:skb_checksum_help (net/core/dev.c:3332 (discriminator 2)) [ 67.891043] Call Trace: [ 67.891173] <TASK> [ 67.891274] ? __warn (kernel/panic.c:741) [ 67.891320] ? skb_checksum_help (net/core/dev.c:3332 (discriminator 2)) [ 67.891333] ? report_bug (lib/bug.c:180 lib/bug.c:219) [ 67.891348] ? handle_bug (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:239) [ 67.891363] ? exc_invalid_op (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:260 (discriminator 1)) [ 67.891372] ? asm_exc_invalid_op (./arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:621) [ 67.891388] ? skb_checksum_help (net/core/dev.c:3332 (discriminator 2)) [ 67.891399] ? skb_checksum_help (net/core/dev.c:3332 (discriminator 2)) [ 67.891416] ip_do_fragment (net/ipv4/ip_output.c:777 (discriminator 1)) [ 67.891448] ? __ip_local_out (./include/linux/skbuff.h:1146 ./include/net/l3mdev.h:196 ./include/net/l3mdev.h:213 ne ---truncated---(CVE-2024-49947)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ublk: don't allow user copy for unprivileged device
UBLK_F_USER_COPY requires userspace to call write() on ublk char device for filling request buffer, and unprivileged device can't be trusted.
So don't allow user copy for unprivileged device.(CVE-2024-50080)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched/core: Disable page allocation in task_tick_mm_cid()
With KASAN and PREEMPT_RT enabled, calling task_work_add() in task_tick_mm_cid() may cause the following splat.
[ 63.696416] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48 [ 63.696416] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 610, name: modprobe [ 63.696416] preempt_count: 10001, expected: 0 [ 63.696416] RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 1
This problem is caused by the following call trace.
sched_tick() [ acquire rq->__lock ] -> task_tick_mm_cid() -> task_work_add() -> __kasan_record_aux_stack() -> kasan_save_stack() -> stack_depot_save_flags() -> alloc_pages_mpol_noprof() -> __alloc_pages_noprof() -> get_page_from_freelist() -> rmqueue() -> rmqueue_pcplist() -> __rmqueue_pcplist() -> rmqueue_bulk() -> rt_spin_lock()
The rq lock is a raw_spinlock_t. We can't sleep while holding it. IOW, we can't call alloc_pages() in stack_depot_save_flags().
The task_tick_mm_cid() function with its task_work_add() call was introduced by commit 223baf9d17f2 ("sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid") in v6.4 kernel.
Fortunately, there is a kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() variant that calls stack_depot_save_flags() while not allowing it to allocate new pages. To allow task_tick_mm_cid() to use task_work without page allocation, a new TWAF_NO_ALLOC flag is added to enable calling kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() instead of kasan_record_aux_stack() if set. The task_tick_mm_cid() function is modified to add this new flag.
The possible downside is the missing stack trace in a KASAN report due to new page allocation required when task_work_add_noallloc() is called which should be rare.(CVE-2024-50140)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipc: fix memleak if msg_init_ns failed in create_ipc_ns
Percpu memory allocation may failed during create_ipc_ns however this fail is not handled properly since ipc sysctls and mq sysctls is not released properly. Fix this by release these two resource when failure.
Here is the kmemleak stack when percpu failed:
unreferenced object 0xffff88819de2a600 (size 512): comm "shmem_2nstest", pid 120711, jiffies 4300542254 hex dump (first 32 bytes): 60 aa 9d 84 ff ff ff ff fc 18 48 b2 84 88 ff ff `.........H..... 04 00 00 00 a4 01 00 00 20 e4 56 81 ff ff ff ff ........ .V..... backtrace (crc be7cba35): [<ffffffff81b43f83>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof+0x333/0x420 [<ffffffff81a52e56>] kmemdup_noprof+0x26/0x50 [<ffffffff821b2f37>] setup_mq_sysctls+0x57/0x1d0 [<ffffffff821b29cc>] copy_ipcs+0x29c/0x3b0 [<ffffffff815d6a10>] create_new_namespaces+0x1d0/0x920 [<ffffffff815d7449>] copy_namespaces+0x2e9/0x3e0 [<ffffffff815458f3>] copy_process+0x29f3/0x7ff0 [<ffffffff8154b080>] kernel_clone+0xc0/0x650 [<ffffffff8154b6b1>] __do_sys_clone+0xa1/0xe0 [<ffffffff843df8ff>] do_syscall_64+0xbf/0x1c0 [<ffffffff846000b0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53(CVE-2024-53175)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: ath12k: fix crash when unbinding
If there is an error during some initialization related to firmware, the function ath12k_dp_cc_cleanup is called to release resources. However this is released again when the device is unbinded (ath12k_pci), and we get: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000020 at RIP: 0010:ath12k_dp_cc_cleanup.part.0+0xb6/0x500 [ath12k] Call Trace: ath12k_dp_cc_cleanup ath12k_dp_free ath12k_core_deinit ath12k_pci_remove ...
The issue is always reproducible from a VM because the MSI addressing initialization is failing.
In order to fix the issue, just set to NULL the released structure in ath12k_dp_cc_cleanup at the end.(CVE-2024-53188)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Fix null check for pipe_ctx->plane_state in hwss_setup_dpp
This commit addresses a null pointer dereference issue in
hwss_setup_dpp(). The issue could occur when pipe_ctx->plane_state is
null. The fix adds a check to ensure pipe_ctx->plane_state is not null
before accessing. This prevents a null pointer dereference.(CVE-2024-53200)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iommu/arm-smmu: Defer probe of clients after smmu device bound
Null pointer dereference occurs due to a race between smmu driver probe and client driver probe, when of_dma_configure() for client is called after the iommu_device_register() for smmu driver probe has executed but before the driver_bound() for smmu driver has been called.
Following is how the race occurs:
T1:Smmu device probe T2: Client device probe
really_probe() arm_smmu_device_probe() iommu_device_register() really_probe() platform_dma_configure() of_dma_configure() of_dma_configure_id() of_iommu_configure() iommu_probe_device() iommu_init_device() arm_smmu_probe_device() arm_smmu_get_by_fwnode() driver_find_device_by_fwnode() driver_find_device() next_device() klist_next() / null ptr assigned to smmu / / null ptr dereference while smmu->streamid_mask / driver_bound() klist_add_tail()
When this null smmu pointer is dereferenced later in arm_smmu_probe_device, the device crashes.
Fix this by deferring the probe of the client device until the smmu device has bound to the arm smmu driver.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: fec: handle page_pool_dev_alloc_pages error
The fec_enet_update_cbd function calls page_pool_dev_alloc_pages but did not handle the case when it returned NULL. There was a WARN_ON(!new_page) but it would still proceed to use the NULL pointer and then crash.
This case does seem somewhat rare but when the system is under memory pressure it can happen. One case where I can duplicate this with some frequency is when writing over a smbd share to a SATA HDD attached to an imx6q.
Setting /proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes to higher values also seems to solve the problem for my test case. But it still seems wrong that the fec driver ignores the memory allocation error and can crash.
This commit handles the allocation error by dropping the current packet.(CVE-2025-21676)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched/fair: Fix potential memory corruption in child_cfs_rq_on_list
child_cfs_rq_on_list attempts to convert a 'prev' pointer to a cfs_rq. This 'prev' pointer can originate from struct rq's leaf_cfs_rq_list, making the conversion invalid and potentially leading to memory corruption. Depending on the relative positions of leaf_cfs_rq_list and the task group (tg) pointer within the struct, this can cause a memory fault or access garbage data.
The issue arises in list_add_leaf_cfs_rq, where both cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list and rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list are added to the same leaf list. Also, rq->tmp_alone_branch can be set to rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list.
This adds a check if (prev == &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list) after the main
conditional in child_cfs_rq_on_list. This ensures that the container_of
operation will convert a correct cfs_rq struct.
This check is sufficient because only cfs_rqs on the same CPU are added to the list, so verifying the 'prev' pointer against the current rq's list head is enough.
Fixes a potential memory corruption issue that due to current struct layout might not be manifesting as a crash but could lead to unpredictable behavior when the layout changes.(CVE-2025-21919)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: vimc: skip .s_stream() for stopped entities
Syzbot reported [1] a warning prompted by a check in call_s_stream() that checks whether .s_stream() operation is warranted for unstarted or stopped subdevs.
Add a simple fix in vimc_streamer_pipeline_terminate() ensuring that entities skip a call to .s_stream() unless they have been previously properly started.
[1] Syzbot report: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5933 at drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c:460 call_s_stream+0x2df/0x350 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c:460 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5933 Comm: syz-executor330 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-syzkaller-00362-g2d8308bf5b67 #0 ... Call Trace: <TASK> vimc_streamer_pipeline_terminate+0x218/0x320 drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-streamer.c:62 vimc_streamer_pipeline_init drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-streamer.c:101 [inline] vimc_streamer_s_stream+0x650/0x9a0 drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-streamer.c:203 vimc_capture_start_streaming+0xa1/0x130 drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-capture.c:256 vb2_start_streaming+0x15f/0x5a0 drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c:1789 vb2_core_streamon+0x2a7/0x450 drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c:2348 vb2_streamon drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c:875 [inline] vb2_ioctl_streamon+0xf4/0x170 drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c:1118 __video_do_ioctl+0xaf0/0xf00 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c:3122 video_usercopy+0x4d2/0x1620 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c:3463 v4l2_ioctl+0x1ba/0x250 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dev.c:366 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:892 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x190/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f2b85c01b19 ...(CVE-2025-22028)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ibmvnic: Use kernel helpers for hex dumps
Previously, when the driver was printing hex dumps, the buffer was cast to an 8 byte long and printed using string formatters. If the buffer size was not a multiple of 8 then a read buffer overflow was possible.
Therefore, create a new ibmvnic function that loops over a buffer and calls hex_dump_to_buffer instead.
This patch address KASAN reports like the one below: ibmvnic 30000003 env3: Login Buffer: ibmvnic 30000003 env3: 01000000af000000 <...> ibmvnic 30000003 env3: 2e6d62692e736261 ibmvnic 30000003 env3: 65050003006d6f63 ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ibmvnic_login+0xacc/0xffc [ibmvnic] Read of size 8 at addr c0000001331a9aa8 by task ip/17681 <...> Allocated by task 17681: <...> ibmvnic_login+0x2f0/0xffc [ibmvnic] ibmvnic_open+0x148/0x308 [ibmvnic] __dev_open+0x1ac/0x304 <...> The buggy address is located 168 bytes inside of allocated 175-byte region [c0000001331a9a00, c0000001331a9aaf) <...> ================================================================= ibmvnic 30000003 env3: 000000000033766e(CVE-2025-22104)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ax25: Remove broken autobind
Binding AX25 socket by using the autobind feature leads to memory leaks in ax25_connect() and also refcount leaks in ax25_release(). Memory leak was detected with kmemleak:
================================================================ unreferenced object 0xffff8880253cd680 (size 96): backtrace: __kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof (./include/linux/kmemleak.h:43) kmemdup_noprof (mm/util.c:136) ax25_rt_autobind (net/ax25/ax25_route.c:428) ax25_connect (net/ax25/af_ax25.c:1282) __sys_connect_file (net/socket.c:2045) __sys_connect (net/socket.c:2064) __x64_sys_connect (net/socket.c:2067) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130) ================================================================
When socket is bound, refcounts must be incremented the way it is done in ax25_bind() and ax25_setsockopt() (SO_BINDTODEVICE). In case of autobind, the refcounts are not incremented.
This bug leads to the following issue reported by Syzkaller:
================================================================ ax25_connect(): syz-executor318 uses autobind, please contact (CVE-2025-22109)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix potential deadloop in prepare_compress_overwrite()
Jan Prusakowski reported a kernel hang issue as below:
When running xfstests on linux-next kernel (6.14.0-rc3, 6.12) I encountered a problem in generic/475 test where fsstress process gets blocked in __f2fs_write_data_pages() and the test hangs. The options I used are:
MKFS_OPTIONS -- -O compression -O extra_attr -O project_quota -O quota /dev/vdc MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr -o discard,compress_extension=* /dev/vdc /vdc
INFO: task kworker/u8:0:11 blocked for more than 122 seconds. Not tainted 6.14.0-rc3-xfstests-lockdep #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u8:0 state:D stack:0 pid:11 tgid:11 ppid:2 task_flags:0x4208160 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-253:0) Call Trace: <TASK> __schedule+0x309/0x8e0 schedule+0x3a/0x100 schedule_preempt_disabled+0x15/0x30 __mutex_lock+0x59a/0xdb0 __f2fs_write_data_pages+0x3ac/0x400 do_writepages+0xe8/0x290 __writeback_single_inode+0x5c/0x360 writeback_sb_inodes+0x22f/0x570 wb_writeback+0xb0/0x410 wb_do_writeback+0x47/0x2f0 wb_workfn+0x5a/0x1c0 process_one_work+0x223/0x5b0 worker_thread+0x1d5/0x3c0 kthread+0xfd/0x230 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>
The root cause is: once generic/475 starts toload error table to dm device, f2fs_prepare_compress_overwrite() will loop reading compressed cluster pages due to IO error, meanwhile it has held .writepages lock, it can block all other writeback tasks.
Let's fix this issue w/ below changes: - add f2fs_handle_page_eio() in prepare_compress_overwrite() to detect IO error. - detect cp_error earler in f2fs_read_multi_pages().(CVE-2025-22127)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI: vmd: Make vmd_dev::cfg_lock a raw_spinlock_t type
The access to the PCI config space via pci_ops::read and pci_ops::write is a low-level hardware access. The functions can be accessed with disabled interrupts even on PREEMPT_RT. The pci_lock is a raw_spinlock_t for this purpose.
A spinlock_t becomes a sleeping lock on PREEMPT_RT, so it cannot be acquired with disabled interrupts. The vmd_dev::cfg_lock is accessed in the same context as the pci_lock.
Make vmd_dev::cfg_lock a raw_spinlock_t type so it can be used with interrupts disabled.
This was reported as:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48 Call Trace: rt_spin_lock+0x4e/0x130 vmd_pci_read+0x8d/0x100 [vmd] pci_user_read_config_byte+0x6f/0xe0 pci_read_config+0xfe/0x290 sysfs_kf_bin_read+0x68/0x90
[bigeasy: reword commit message] Tested-off-by: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves <(CVE-2025-23161)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: ignore xattrs past end
Once inside 'ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all' we should ignore xattrs entries past the 'end' entry.
This fixes the following KASAN reported issue:
================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0xb8c/0xe90 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888012c120c4 by task repro/2065
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2065 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2+ #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x1fd/0x300 ? tcp_gro_dev_warn+0x260/0x260 ? _printk+0xc0/0x100 ? read_lock_is_recursive+0x10/0x10 ? irq_work_queue+0x72/0xf0 ? __virt_addr_valid+0x17b/0x4b0 print_address_description+0x78/0x390 print_report+0x107/0x1f0 ? __virt_addr_valid+0x17b/0x4b0 ? __virt_addr_valid+0x3ff/0x4b0 ? __phys_addr+0xb5/0x160 ? ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0xb8c/0xe90 kasan_report+0xcc/0x100 ? ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0xb8c/0xe90 ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0xb8c/0xe90 ? ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0xd30/0xd30 ? __ext4_journal_ensure_credits+0x5f0/0x5f0 ? __ext4_journal_ensure_credits+0x2b/0x5f0 ? inode_update_timestamps+0x410/0x410 ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0xb64/0xd30 ? ext4_truncate+0xb70/0xdc0 ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x1d20/0x1d20 ? __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x670/0x670 ? ext4_journal_check_start+0x16f/0x240 ? ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink+0x2f2/0x3a0 ext4_evict_inode+0xc8c/0xff0 ? ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink+0x3a0/0x3a0 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x53/0x8a0 ? ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink+0x3a0/0x3a0 evict+0x4ac/0x950 ? proc_nr_inodes+0x310/0x310 ? trace_ext4_drop_inode+0xa2/0x220 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1a/0x30 ? iput+0x4cb/0x7e0 do_unlinkat+0x495/0x7c0 ? try_break_deleg+0x120/0x120 ? 0xffffffff81000000 ? __check_object_size+0x15a/0x210 ? strncpy_from_user+0x13e/0x250 ? getname_flags+0x1dc/0x530 __x64_sys_unlinkat+0xc8/0xf0 do_syscall_64+0x65/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0x6f RIP: 0033:0x434ffd Code: 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 8 RSP: 002b:00007ffc50fa7b28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000107 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc50fa7e18 RCX: 0000000000434ffd RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000240 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00007ffc50fa7be0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 00007ffc50fa7e08 R14: 00000000004bbf30 R15: 0000000000000001 </TASK>
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888012c12000 which belongs to the cache filp of size 360 The buggy address is located 196 bytes inside of freed 360-byte region [ffff888012c12000, ffff888012c12168)
The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x12c12 head: order:1 mapcount:0 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0 pincount:0 flags: 0x40(head|node=0|zone=0) page_type: f5(slab) raw: 0000000000000040 ffff888000ad7640 ffffea0000497a00 dead000000000004 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000100010 00000001f5000000 0000000000000000 head: 0000000000000040 ffff888000ad7640 ffffea0000497a00 dead000000000004 head: 0000000000000000 0000000000100010 00000001f5000000 0000000000000000 head: 0000000000000001 ffffea00004b0481 ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000000 head: 0000000000000002 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
Memory state around the buggy address: ffff888012c11f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff888012c12000: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb > ffff888012c12080: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ^ ffff888012c12100: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc ffff888012c12180: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc ---truncated---(CVE-2025-37738)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
perf: Fix hang while freeing sigtrap event
Perf can hang while freeing a sigtrap event if a related deferred signal hadn't managed to be sent before the file got closed:
perf_event_overflow() task_work_add(perf_pending_task)
fput() task_work_add(____fput())
task_work_run() ____fput() perf_release() perf_event_release_kernel() _free_event() perf_pending_task_sync() task_work_cancel() -> FAILED rcuwait_wait_event()
Once task_work_run() is running, the list of pending callbacks is removed from the task_struct and from this point on task_work_cancel() can't remove any pending and not yet started work items, hence the task_work_cancel() failure and the hang on rcuwait_wait_event().
Task work could be changed to remove one work at a time, so a work running on the current task can always cancel a pending one, however the wait / wake design is still subject to inverted dependencies when remote targets are involved, as pictured by Oleg:
T1 T2
fd = perf_event_open(pid => T2->pid); fd = perf_event_open(pid => T1->pid); close(fd) close(fd) <IRQ> <IRQ> perf_event_overflow() perf_event_overflow() task_work_add(perf_pending_task) task_work_add(perf_pending_task) </IRQ> </IRQ> fput() fput() task_work_add(_fput()) taskwork_add(__fput())
task_work_run() task_work_run()
____fput() ____fput()
perf_release() perf_release()
perf_event_release_kernel() perf_event_release_kernel()
_free_event() _free_event()
perf_pending_task_sync() perf_pending_task_sync()
rcuwait_wait_event() rcuwait_wait_event()
Therefore the only option left is to acquire the event reference count upon queueing the perf task work and release it from the task work, just like it was done before 3a5465418f5f ("perf: Fix event leak upon exec and file release") but without the leaks it fixed.
Some adjustments are necessary to make it work:
-
A child event might dereference its parent upon freeing. Care must be taken to release the parent last.
-
Some places assuming the event doesn't have any reference held and therefore can be freed right away must instead put the reference and let the reference counting to its job.(CVE-2025-37747)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI: Fix reference leak in pci_register_host_bridge()
If device_register() fails, call put_device() to give up the reference to avoid a memory leak, per the comment at device_register().
Found by code review.
[bhelgaas: squash Dan Carpenter's double free fix from https://lore.kernel.org/r/(CVE-2025-37836)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Fix slab-use-after-free in hdcp
The HDCP code in amdgpu_dm_hdcp.c copies pointers to amdgpu_dm_connector objects without incrementing the kref reference counts. When using a USB-C dock, and the dock is unplugged, the corresponding amdgpu_dm_connector objects are freed, creating dangling pointers in the HDCP code. When the dock is plugged back, the dangling pointers are dereferenced, resulting in a slab-use-after-free:
[ 66.775837] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in event_property_validate+0x42f/0x6c0 [amdgpu] [ 66.776171] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888127804120 by task kworker/0:1/10
[ 66.776179] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 10 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7-00180-g54505f727a38-dirty #233 [ 66.776183] Hardware name: HP HP Pavilion Aero Laptop 13-be0xxx/8916, BIOS F.17 12/18/2024 [ 66.776186] Workqueue: events event_property_validate [amdgpu] [ 66.776494] Call Trace: [ 66.776496] <TASK> [ 66.776497] dump_stack_lvl+0x70/0xa0 [ 66.776504] print_report+0x175/0x555 [ 66.776507] ? __virt_addr_valid+0x243/0x450 [ 66.776510] ? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x66/0x1c0 [ 66.776515] kasan_report+0xeb/0x1c0 [ 66.776518] ? event_property_validate+0x42f/0x6c0 [amdgpu] [ 66.776819] ? event_property_validate+0x42f/0x6c0 [amdgpu] [ 66.777121] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x14/0x20 [ 66.777124] event_property_validate+0x42f/0x6c0 [amdgpu] [ 66.777342] ? __lock_acquire+0x6b40/0x6b40 [ 66.777347] ? enable_assr+0x250/0x250 [amdgpu] [ 66.777571] process_one_work+0x86b/0x1510 [ 66.777575] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0xcf0/0xcf0 [ 66.777578] ? assign_work+0x16b/0x280 [ 66.777580] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa3/0x130 [ 66.777583] worker_thread+0x5c0/0xfa0 [ 66.777587] ? process_one_work+0x1510/0x1510 [ 66.777588] kthread+0x3a2/0x840 [ 66.777591] ? kthread_is_per_cpu+0xd0/0xd0 [ 66.777594] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x4f/0x60 [ 66.777597] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x60 [ 66.777599] ? calculate_sigpending+0x77/0xa0 [ 66.777602] ? kthread_is_per_cpu+0xd0/0xd0 [ 66.777605] ret_from_fork+0x40/0x90 [ 66.777607] ? kthread_is_per_cpu+0xd0/0xd0 [ 66.777609] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 66.777614] </TASK>
[ 66.777643] Allocated by task 10: [ 66.777646] kasan_save_stack+0x39/0x60 [ 66.777649] kasan_save_track+0x14/0x40 [ 66.777652] kasan_save_alloc_info+0x37/0x50 [ 66.777655] __kasan_kmalloc+0xbb/0xc0 [ 66.777658] __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x1c8/0x4b0 [ 66.777661] dm_dp_add_mst_connector+0xdd/0x5c0 [amdgpu] [ 66.777880] drm_dp_mst_port_add_connector+0x47e/0x770 [drm_display_helper] [ 66.777892] drm_dp_send_link_address+0x1554/0x2bf0 [drm_display_helper] [ 66.777901] drm_dp_check_and_send_link_address+0x187/0x1f0 [drm_display_helper] [ 66.777909] drm_dp_mst_link_probe_work+0x2b8/0x410 [drm_display_helper] [ 66.777917] process_one_work+0x86b/0x1510 [ 66.777919] worker_thread+0x5c0/0xfa0 [ 66.777922] kthread+0x3a2/0x840 [ 66.777925] ret_from_fork+0x40/0x90 [ 66.777927] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
[ 66.777932] Freed by task 1713: [ 66.777935] kasan_save_stack+0x39/0x60 [ 66.777938] kasan_save_track+0x14/0x40 [ 66.777940] kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60 [ 66.777944] __kasan_slab_free+0x52/0x70 [ 66.777946] kfree+0x13f/0x4b0 [ 66.777949] dm_dp_mst_connector_destroy+0xfa/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 66.778179] drm_connector_free+0x7d/0xb0 [ 66.778184] drm_mode_object_put.part.0+0xee/0x160 [ 66.778188] drm_mode_object_put+0x37/0x50 [ 66.778191] drm_atomic_state_default_clear+0x220/0xd60 [ 66.778194] __drm_atomic_state_free+0x16e/0x2a0 [ 66.778197] drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x15ed/0x2ba0 [ 66.778200] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x17a/0x310 [ 66.778203] drm_ioctl+0x584/0xd10 [ 66.778206] amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0xd2/0x1c0 [amdgpu] [ 66.778375] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x139/0x1a0 [ 66.778378] x64_sys_call+0xee7/0xfb0 [ 66.778381] ---truncated---(CVE-2025-37903)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: Fix UAF in __close_file_table_ids
A use-after-free is possible if one thread destroys the file via __ksmbd_close_fd while another thread holds a reference to it. The existing checks on fp->refcount are not sufficient to prevent this.
The fix takes ft->lock around the section which removes the file from the file table. This prevents two threads acquiring the same file pointer via __close_file_table_ids, as well as the other functions which retrieve a file from the IDR and which already use this same lock.(CVE-2025-37952)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fix a couple of races in MNT_TREE_BENEATH handling by do_move_mount()
Normally do_lock_mount(path, _) is locking a mountpoint pinned by *path and at the time when matching unlock_mount() unlocks that location it is still pinned by the same thing.
Unfortunately, for 'beneath' case it's no longer that simple - the object being locked is not the one *path points to. It's the mountpoint of path->mnt. The thing is, without sufficient locking ->mnt_parent may change under us and none of the locks are held at that point. The rules are * mount_lock stabilizes m->mnt_parent for any mount m. * namespace_sem stabilizes m->mnt_parent, provided that m is mounted. * if either of the above holds and refcount of m is positive, we are guaranteed the same for refcount of m->mnt_parent.
namespace_sem nests inside inode_lock(), so do_lock_mount() has to take inode_lock() before grabbing namespace_sem. It does recheck that path->mnt is still mounted in the same place after getting namespace_sem, and it does take care to pin the dentry. It is needed, since otherwise we might end up with racing mount --move (or umount) happening while we were getting locks; in that case dentry would no longer be a mountpoint and could've been evicted on memory pressure along with its inode - not something you want when grabbing lock on that inode.
However, pinning a dentry is not enough - the matching mount is also pinned only by the fact that path->mnt is mounted on top it and at that point we are not holding any locks whatsoever, so the same kind of races could end up with all references to that mount gone just as we are about to enter inode_lock(). If that happens, we are left with filesystem being shut down while we are holding a dentry reference on it; results are not pretty.
What we need to do is grab both dentry and mount at the same time; that makes inode_lock() safe and avoids the problem with fs getting shut down under us. After taking namespace_sem we verify that path->mnt is still mounted (which stabilizes its ->mnt_parent) and check that it's still mounted at the same place. From that point on to the matching namespace_unlock() we are guaranteed that mount/dentry pair we'd grabbed are also pinned by being the mountpoint of path->mnt, so we can quietly drop both the dentry reference (as the current code does) and mnt one - it's OK to do under namespace_sem, since we are not dropping the final refs.
That solves the problem on do_lock_mount() side; unlock_mount() also has one, since dentry is guaranteed to stay pinned only until the namespace_unlock(). That's easy to fix - just have inode_unlock() done earlier, while it's still pinned by mp->m_dentry.(CVE-2025-37988)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-95.0.0.88.oe2403"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: test for not too small csum_start in virtio_net_hdr_to_skb()\n\nsyzbot was able to trigger this warning [1], after injecting a\nmalicious packet through af_packet, setting skb-\u0026gt;csum_start and thus\nthe transport header to an incorrect value.\n\nWe can at least make sure the transport header is after\nthe end of the network header (with a estimated minimal size).\n\n[1]\n[ 67.873027] skb len=4096 headroom=16 headlen=14 tailroom=0\nmac=(-1,-1) mac_len=0 net=(16,-6) trans=10\nshinfo(txflags=0 nr_frags=1 gso(size=0 type=0 segs=0))\ncsum(0xa start=10 offset=0 ip_summed=3 complete_sw=0 valid=0 level=0)\nhash(0x0 sw=0 l4=0) proto=0x0800 pkttype=0 iif=0\npriority=0x0 mark=0x0 alloc_cpu=10 vlan_all=0x0\nencapsulation=0 inner(proto=0x0000, mac=0, net=0, trans=0)\n[ 67.877172] dev name=veth0_vlan feat=0x000061164fdd09e9\n[ 67.877764] sk family=17 type=3 proto=0\n[ 67.878279] skb linear: 00000000: 00 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 0f 00 00 00 08 00\n[ 67.879128] skb frag: 00000000: 0e 00 07 00 00 00 28 00 08 80 1c 00 04 00 00 02\n[ 67.879877] skb frag: 00000010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n[ 67.880647] skb frag: 00000020: 00 00 02 00 00 00 08 00 1b 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n[ 67.881156] skb frag: 00000030: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n[ 67.881753] skb frag: 00000040: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n[ 67.882173] skb frag: 00000050: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n[ 67.882790] skb frag: 00000060: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n[ 67.883171] skb frag: 00000070: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n[ 67.883733] skb frag: 00000080: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n[ 67.884206] skb frag: 00000090: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 69 70 76 6c 61 6e\n[ 67.884704] skb frag: 000000a0: 31 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2b 00 00 00 00 00\n[ 67.885139] skb frag: 000000b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n[ 67.885677] skb frag: 000000c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n[ 67.886042] skb frag: 000000d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n[ 67.886408] skb frag: 000000e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n[ 67.887020] skb frag: 000000f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n[ 67.887384] skb frag: 00000100: 00 00\n[ 67.887878] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[ 67.887908] offset (-6) \u0026gt;= skb_headlen() (14)\n[ 67.888445] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 2088 at net/core/dev.c:3332 skb_checksum_help (net/core/dev.c:3332 (discriminator 2))\n[ 67.889353] Modules linked in: macsec macvtap macvlan hsr wireguard curve25519_x86_64 libcurve25519_generic libchacha20poly1305 chacha_x86_64 libchacha poly1305_x86_64 dummy bridge sr_mod cdrom evdev pcspkr i2c_piix4 9pnet_virtio 9p 9pnet netfs\n[ 67.890111] CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 2088 Comm: b363492833 Not tainted 6.11.0-virtme #1011\n[ 67.890183] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014\n[ 67.890309] RIP: 0010:skb_checksum_help (net/core/dev.c:3332 (discriminator 2))\n[ 67.891043] Call Trace:\n[ 67.891173] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 67.891274] ? __warn (kernel/panic.c:741)\n[ 67.891320] ? skb_checksum_help (net/core/dev.c:3332 (discriminator 2))\n[ 67.891333] ? report_bug (lib/bug.c:180 lib/bug.c:219)\n[ 67.891348] ? handle_bug (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:239)\n[ 67.891363] ? exc_invalid_op (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:260 (discriminator 1))\n[ 67.891372] ? asm_exc_invalid_op (./arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:621)\n[ 67.891388] ? skb_checksum_help (net/core/dev.c:3332 (discriminator 2))\n[ 67.891399] ? skb_checksum_help (net/core/dev.c:3332 (discriminator 2))\n[ 67.891416] ip_do_fragment (net/ipv4/ip_output.c:777 (discriminator 1))\n[ 67.891448] ? __ip_local_out (./include/linux/skbuff.h:1146 ./include/net/l3mdev.h:196 ./include/net/l3mdev.h:213 ne\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-49947)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nublk: don\u0026apos;t allow user copy for unprivileged device\n\nUBLK_F_USER_COPY requires userspace to call write() on ublk char\ndevice for filling request buffer, and unprivileged device can\u0026apos;t\nbe trusted.\n\nSo don\u0026apos;t allow user copy for unprivileged device.(CVE-2024-50080)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsched/core: Disable page allocation in task_tick_mm_cid()\n\nWith KASAN and PREEMPT_RT enabled, calling task_work_add() in\ntask_tick_mm_cid() may cause the following splat.\n\n[ 63.696416] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48\n[ 63.696416] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 610, name: modprobe\n[ 63.696416] preempt_count: 10001, expected: 0\n[ 63.696416] RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 1\n\nThis problem is caused by the following call trace.\n\n sched_tick() [ acquire rq-\u0026gt;__lock ]\n -\u0026gt; task_tick_mm_cid()\n -\u0026gt; task_work_add()\n -\u0026gt; __kasan_record_aux_stack()\n -\u0026gt; kasan_save_stack()\n -\u0026gt; stack_depot_save_flags()\n -\u0026gt; alloc_pages_mpol_noprof()\n -\u0026gt; __alloc_pages_noprof()\n\t -\u0026gt; get_page_from_freelist()\n\t -\u0026gt; rmqueue()\n\t -\u0026gt; rmqueue_pcplist()\n\t -\u0026gt; __rmqueue_pcplist()\n\t -\u0026gt; rmqueue_bulk()\n\t -\u0026gt; rt_spin_lock()\n\nThe rq lock is a raw_spinlock_t. We can\u0026apos;t sleep while holding\nit. IOW, we can\u0026apos;t call alloc_pages() in stack_depot_save_flags().\n\nThe task_tick_mm_cid() function with its task_work_add() call was\nintroduced by commit 223baf9d17f2 (\u0026quot;sched: Fix performance regression\nintroduced by mm_cid\u0026quot;) in v6.4 kernel.\n\nFortunately, there is a kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() variant that\ncalls stack_depot_save_flags() while not allowing it to allocate\nnew pages. To allow task_tick_mm_cid() to use task_work without\npage allocation, a new TWAF_NO_ALLOC flag is added to enable calling\nkasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() instead of kasan_record_aux_stack()\nif set. The task_tick_mm_cid() function is modified to add this new flag.\n\nThe possible downside is the missing stack trace in a KASAN report due\nto new page allocation required when task_work_add_noallloc() is called\nwhich should be rare.(CVE-2024-50140)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipc: fix memleak if msg_init_ns failed in create_ipc_ns\n\nPercpu memory allocation may failed during create_ipc_ns however this\nfail is not handled properly since ipc sysctls and mq sysctls is not\nreleased properly. Fix this by release these two resource when failure.\n\nHere is the kmemleak stack when percpu failed:\n\nunreferenced object 0xffff88819de2a600 (size 512):\n comm \u0026quot;shmem_2nstest\u0026quot;, pid 120711, jiffies 4300542254\n hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 60 aa 9d 84 ff ff ff ff fc 18 48 b2 84 88 ff ff `.........H.....\n 04 00 00 00 a4 01 00 00 20 e4 56 81 ff ff ff ff ........ .V.....\n backtrace (crc be7cba35):\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff81b43f83\u0026gt;] __kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof+0x333/0x420\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff81a52e56\u0026gt;] kmemdup_noprof+0x26/0x50\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff821b2f37\u0026gt;] setup_mq_sysctls+0x57/0x1d0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff821b29cc\u0026gt;] copy_ipcs+0x29c/0x3b0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff815d6a10\u0026gt;] create_new_namespaces+0x1d0/0x920\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff815d7449\u0026gt;] copy_namespaces+0x2e9/0x3e0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff815458f3\u0026gt;] copy_process+0x29f3/0x7ff0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff8154b080\u0026gt;] kernel_clone+0xc0/0x650\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff8154b6b1\u0026gt;] __do_sys_clone+0xa1/0xe0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff843df8ff\u0026gt;] do_syscall_64+0xbf/0x1c0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff846000b0\u0026gt;] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53(CVE-2024-53175)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: ath12k: fix crash when unbinding\n\nIf there is an error during some initialization related to firmware,\nthe function ath12k_dp_cc_cleanup is called to release resources.\nHowever this is released again when the device is unbinded (ath12k_pci),\nand we get:\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000020\nat RIP: 0010:ath12k_dp_cc_cleanup.part.0+0xb6/0x500 [ath12k]\nCall Trace:\nath12k_dp_cc_cleanup\nath12k_dp_free\nath12k_core_deinit\nath12k_pci_remove\n...\n\nThe issue is always reproducible from a VM because the MSI addressing\ninitialization is failing.\n\nIn order to fix the issue, just set to NULL the released structure in\nath12k_dp_cc_cleanup at the end.(CVE-2024-53188)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Fix null check for pipe_ctx-\u0026gt;plane_state in hwss_setup_dpp\n\nThis commit addresses a null pointer dereference issue in\nhwss_setup_dpp(). The issue could occur when pipe_ctx-\u0026gt;plane_state is\nnull. The fix adds a check to ensure `pipe_ctx-\u0026gt;plane_state` is not null\nbefore accessing. This prevents a null pointer dereference.(CVE-2024-53200)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\niommu/arm-smmu: Defer probe of clients after smmu device bound\n\nNull pointer dereference occurs due to a race between smmu\ndriver probe and client driver probe, when of_dma_configure()\nfor client is called after the iommu_device_register() for smmu driver\nprobe has executed but before the driver_bound() for smmu driver\nhas been called.\n\nFollowing is how the race occurs:\n\nT1:Smmu device probe\t\tT2: Client device probe\n\nreally_probe()\narm_smmu_device_probe()\niommu_device_register()\n\t\t\t\t\treally_probe()\n\t\t\t\t\tplatform_dma_configure()\n\t\t\t\t\tof_dma_configure()\n\t\t\t\t\tof_dma_configure_id()\n\t\t\t\t\tof_iommu_configure()\n\t\t\t\t\tiommu_probe_device()\n\t\t\t\t\tiommu_init_device()\n\t\t\t\t\tarm_smmu_probe_device()\n\t\t\t\t\tarm_smmu_get_by_fwnode()\n\t\t\t\t\t\tdriver_find_device_by_fwnode()\n\t\t\t\t\t\tdriver_find_device()\n\t\t\t\t\t\tnext_device()\n\t\t\t\t\t\tklist_next()\n\t\t\t\t\t\t /* null ptr\n\t\t\t\t\t\t assigned to smmu */\n\t\t\t\t\t/* null ptr dereference\n\t\t\t\t\t while smmu-\u0026gt;streamid_mask */\ndriver_bound()\n\tklist_add_tail()\n\nWhen this null smmu pointer is dereferenced later in\narm_smmu_probe_device, the device crashes.\n\nFix this by deferring the probe of the client device\nuntil the smmu device has bound to the arm smmu driver.\n\n[will: Add comment](CVE-2024-56568)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: fec: handle page_pool_dev_alloc_pages error\n\nThe fec_enet_update_cbd function calls page_pool_dev_alloc_pages but did\nnot handle the case when it returned NULL. There was a WARN_ON(!new_page)\nbut it would still proceed to use the NULL pointer and then crash.\n\nThis case does seem somewhat rare but when the system is under memory\npressure it can happen. One case where I can duplicate this with some\nfrequency is when writing over a smbd share to a SATA HDD attached to an\nimx6q.\n\nSetting /proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes to higher values also seems to solve\nthe problem for my test case. But it still seems wrong that the fec driver\nignores the memory allocation error and can crash.\n\nThis commit handles the allocation error by dropping the current packet.(CVE-2025-21676)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsched/fair: Fix potential memory corruption in child_cfs_rq_on_list\n\nchild_cfs_rq_on_list attempts to convert a \u0026apos;prev\u0026apos; pointer to a cfs_rq.\nThis \u0026apos;prev\u0026apos; pointer can originate from struct rq\u0026apos;s leaf_cfs_rq_list,\nmaking the conversion invalid and potentially leading to memory\ncorruption. Depending on the relative positions of leaf_cfs_rq_list and\nthe task group (tg) pointer within the struct, this can cause a memory\nfault or access garbage data.\n\nThe issue arises in list_add_leaf_cfs_rq, where both\ncfs_rq-\u0026gt;leaf_cfs_rq_list and rq-\u0026gt;leaf_cfs_rq_list are added to the same\nleaf list. Also, rq-\u0026gt;tmp_alone_branch can be set to rq-\u0026gt;leaf_cfs_rq_list.\n\nThis adds a check `if (prev == \u0026amp;rq-\u0026gt;leaf_cfs_rq_list)` after the main\nconditional in child_cfs_rq_on_list. This ensures that the container_of\noperation will convert a correct cfs_rq struct.\n\nThis check is sufficient because only cfs_rqs on the same CPU are added\nto the list, so verifying the \u0026apos;prev\u0026apos; pointer against the current rq\u0026apos;s list\nhead is enough.\n\nFixes a potential memory corruption issue that due to current struct\nlayout might not be manifesting as a crash but could lead to unpredictable\nbehavior when the layout changes.(CVE-2025-21919)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: vimc: skip .s_stream() for stopped entities\n\nSyzbot reported [1] a warning prompted by a check in call_s_stream()\nthat checks whether .s_stream() operation is warranted for unstarted\nor stopped subdevs.\n\nAdd a simple fix in vimc_streamer_pipeline_terminate() ensuring that\nentities skip a call to .s_stream() unless they have been previously\nproperly started.\n\n[1] Syzbot report:\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5933 at drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c:460 call_s_stream+0x2df/0x350 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c:460\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5933 Comm: syz-executor330 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-syzkaller-00362-g2d8308bf5b67 #0\n...\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n vimc_streamer_pipeline_terminate+0x218/0x320 drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-streamer.c:62\n vimc_streamer_pipeline_init drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-streamer.c:101 [inline]\n vimc_streamer_s_stream+0x650/0x9a0 drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-streamer.c:203\n vimc_capture_start_streaming+0xa1/0x130 drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-capture.c:256\n vb2_start_streaming+0x15f/0x5a0 drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c:1789\n vb2_core_streamon+0x2a7/0x450 drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c:2348\n vb2_streamon drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c:875 [inline]\n vb2_ioctl_streamon+0xf4/0x170 drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c:1118\n __video_do_ioctl+0xaf0/0xf00 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c:3122\n video_usercopy+0x4d2/0x1620 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c:3463\n v4l2_ioctl+0x1ba/0x250 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dev.c:366\n vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:892 [inline]\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x190/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:892\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\nRIP: 0033:0x7f2b85c01b19\n...(CVE-2025-22028)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nibmvnic: Use kernel helpers for hex dumps\n\nPreviously, when the driver was printing hex dumps, the buffer was cast\nto an 8 byte long and printed using string formatters. If the buffer\nsize was not a multiple of 8 then a read buffer overflow was possible.\n\nTherefore, create a new ibmvnic function that loops over a buffer and\ncalls hex_dump_to_buffer instead.\n\nThis patch address KASAN reports like the one below:\n ibmvnic 30000003 env3: Login Buffer:\n ibmvnic 30000003 env3: 01000000af000000\n \u0026lt;...\u0026gt;\n ibmvnic 30000003 env3: 2e6d62692e736261\n ibmvnic 30000003 env3: 65050003006d6f63\n ==================================================================\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ibmvnic_login+0xacc/0xffc [ibmvnic]\n Read of size 8 at addr c0000001331a9aa8 by task ip/17681\n \u0026lt;...\u0026gt;\n Allocated by task 17681:\n \u0026lt;...\u0026gt;\n ibmvnic_login+0x2f0/0xffc [ibmvnic]\n ibmvnic_open+0x148/0x308 [ibmvnic]\n __dev_open+0x1ac/0x304\n \u0026lt;...\u0026gt;\n The buggy address is located 168 bytes inside of\n allocated 175-byte region [c0000001331a9a00, c0000001331a9aaf)\n \u0026lt;...\u0026gt;\n =================================================================\n ibmvnic 30000003 env3: 000000000033766e(CVE-2025-22104)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nax25: Remove broken autobind\n\nBinding AX25 socket by using the autobind feature leads to memory leaks\nin ax25_connect() and also refcount leaks in ax25_release(). Memory\nleak was detected with kmemleak:\n\n================================================================\nunreferenced object 0xffff8880253cd680 (size 96):\nbacktrace:\n__kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof (./include/linux/kmemleak.h:43)\nkmemdup_noprof (mm/util.c:136)\nax25_rt_autobind (net/ax25/ax25_route.c:428)\nax25_connect (net/ax25/af_ax25.c:1282)\n__sys_connect_file (net/socket.c:2045)\n__sys_connect (net/socket.c:2064)\n__x64_sys_connect (net/socket.c:2067)\ndo_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83)\nentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)\n================================================================\n\nWhen socket is bound, refcounts must be incremented the way it is done\nin ax25_bind() and ax25_setsockopt() (SO_BINDTODEVICE). In case of\nautobind, the refcounts are not incremented.\n\nThis bug leads to the following issue reported by Syzkaller:\n\n================================================================\nax25_connect(): syz-executor318 uses autobind, please contact (CVE-2025-22109)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nf2fs: fix potential deadloop in prepare_compress_overwrite()\n\nJan Prusakowski reported a kernel hang issue as below:\n\nWhen running xfstests on linux-next kernel (6.14.0-rc3, 6.12) I\nencountered a problem in generic/475 test where fsstress process\ngets blocked in __f2fs_write_data_pages() and the test hangs.\nThe options I used are:\n\nMKFS_OPTIONS -- -O compression -O extra_attr -O project_quota -O quota /dev/vdc\nMOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr -o discard,compress_extension=* /dev/vdc /vdc\n\nINFO: task kworker/u8:0:11 blocked for more than 122 seconds.\n Not tainted 6.14.0-rc3-xfstests-lockdep #1\n\u0026quot;echo 0 \u0026gt; /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs\u0026quot; disables this message.\ntask:kworker/u8:0 state:D stack:0 pid:11 tgid:11 ppid:2 task_flags:0x4208160 flags:0x00004000\nWorkqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-253:0)\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __schedule+0x309/0x8e0\n schedule+0x3a/0x100\n schedule_preempt_disabled+0x15/0x30\n __mutex_lock+0x59a/0xdb0\n __f2fs_write_data_pages+0x3ac/0x400\n do_writepages+0xe8/0x290\n __writeback_single_inode+0x5c/0x360\n writeback_sb_inodes+0x22f/0x570\n wb_writeback+0xb0/0x410\n wb_do_writeback+0x47/0x2f0\n wb_workfn+0x5a/0x1c0\n process_one_work+0x223/0x5b0\n worker_thread+0x1d5/0x3c0\n kthread+0xfd/0x230\n ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\nThe root cause is: once generic/475 starts toload error table to dm\ndevice, f2fs_prepare_compress_overwrite() will loop reading compressed\ncluster pages due to IO error, meanwhile it has held .writepages lock,\nit can block all other writeback tasks.\n\nLet\u0026apos;s fix this issue w/ below changes:\n- add f2fs_handle_page_eio() in prepare_compress_overwrite() to\ndetect IO error.\n- detect cp_error earler in f2fs_read_multi_pages().(CVE-2025-22127)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI: vmd: Make vmd_dev::cfg_lock a raw_spinlock_t type\n\nThe access to the PCI config space via pci_ops::read and pci_ops::write is\na low-level hardware access. The functions can be accessed with disabled\ninterrupts even on PREEMPT_RT. The pci_lock is a raw_spinlock_t for this\npurpose.\n\nA spinlock_t becomes a sleeping lock on PREEMPT_RT, so it cannot be\nacquired with disabled interrupts. The vmd_dev::cfg_lock is accessed in\nthe same context as the pci_lock.\n\nMake vmd_dev::cfg_lock a raw_spinlock_t type so it can be used with\ninterrupts disabled.\n\nThis was reported as:\n\n BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48\n Call Trace:\n rt_spin_lock+0x4e/0x130\n vmd_pci_read+0x8d/0x100 [vmd]\n pci_user_read_config_byte+0x6f/0xe0\n pci_read_config+0xfe/0x290\n sysfs_kf_bin_read+0x68/0x90\n\n[bigeasy: reword commit message]\nTested-off-by: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves \u0026lt;(CVE-2025-23161)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: ignore xattrs past end\n\nOnce inside \u0026apos;ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all\u0026apos; we should\nignore xattrs entries past the \u0026apos;end\u0026apos; entry.\n\nThis fixes the following KASAN reported issue:\n\n==================================================================\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0xb8c/0xe90\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff888012c120c4 by task repro/2065\n\nCPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2065 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2+ #11\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x1fd/0x300\n ? tcp_gro_dev_warn+0x260/0x260\n ? _printk+0xc0/0x100\n ? read_lock_is_recursive+0x10/0x10\n ? irq_work_queue+0x72/0xf0\n ? __virt_addr_valid+0x17b/0x4b0\n print_address_description+0x78/0x390\n print_report+0x107/0x1f0\n ? __virt_addr_valid+0x17b/0x4b0\n ? __virt_addr_valid+0x3ff/0x4b0\n ? __phys_addr+0xb5/0x160\n ? ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0xb8c/0xe90\n kasan_report+0xcc/0x100\n ? ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0xb8c/0xe90\n ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0xb8c/0xe90\n ? ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0xd30/0xd30\n ? __ext4_journal_ensure_credits+0x5f0/0x5f0\n ? __ext4_journal_ensure_credits+0x2b/0x5f0\n ? inode_update_timestamps+0x410/0x410\n ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0xb64/0xd30\n ? ext4_truncate+0xb70/0xdc0\n ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x1d20/0x1d20\n ? __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x670/0x670\n ? ext4_journal_check_start+0x16f/0x240\n ? ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink+0x2f2/0x3a0\n ext4_evict_inode+0xc8c/0xff0\n ? ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink+0x3a0/0x3a0\n ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x53/0x8a0\n ? ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink+0x3a0/0x3a0\n evict+0x4ac/0x950\n ? proc_nr_inodes+0x310/0x310\n ? trace_ext4_drop_inode+0xa2/0x220\n ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1a/0x30\n ? iput+0x4cb/0x7e0\n do_unlinkat+0x495/0x7c0\n ? try_break_deleg+0x120/0x120\n ? 0xffffffff81000000\n ? __check_object_size+0x15a/0x210\n ? strncpy_from_user+0x13e/0x250\n ? getname_flags+0x1dc/0x530\n __x64_sys_unlinkat+0xc8/0xf0\n do_syscall_64+0x65/0x110\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0x6f\nRIP: 0033:0x434ffd\nCode: 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 8\nRSP: 002b:00007ffc50fa7b28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000107\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc50fa7e18 RCX: 0000000000434ffd\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000240 RDI: 0000000000000005\nRBP: 00007ffc50fa7be0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001\nR13: 00007ffc50fa7e08 R14: 00000000004bbf30 R15: 0000000000000001\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\nThe buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888012c12000\n which belongs to the cache filp of size 360\nThe buggy address is located 196 bytes inside of\n freed 360-byte region [ffff888012c12000, ffff888012c12168)\n\nThe buggy address belongs to the physical page:\npage: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x12c12\nhead: order:1 mapcount:0 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0 pincount:0\nflags: 0x40(head|node=0|zone=0)\npage_type: f5(slab)\nraw: 0000000000000040 ffff888000ad7640 ffffea0000497a00 dead000000000004\nraw: 0000000000000000 0000000000100010 00000001f5000000 0000000000000000\nhead: 0000000000000040 ffff888000ad7640 ffffea0000497a00 dead000000000004\nhead: 0000000000000000 0000000000100010 00000001f5000000 0000000000000000\nhead: 0000000000000001 ffffea00004b0481 ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000000\nhead: 0000000000000002 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000\npage dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\n\nMemory state around the buggy address:\n ffff888012c11f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n ffff888012c12000: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb\n\u0026gt; ffff888012c12080: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb\n ^\n ffff888012c12100: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc\n ffff888012c12180: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc\n---truncated---(CVE-2025-37738)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nperf: Fix hang while freeing sigtrap event\n\nPerf can hang while freeing a sigtrap event if a related deferred\nsignal hadn\u0026apos;t managed to be sent before the file got closed:\n\nperf_event_overflow()\n task_work_add(perf_pending_task)\n\nfput()\n task_work_add(____fput())\n\ntask_work_run()\n ____fput()\n perf_release()\n perf_event_release_kernel()\n _free_event()\n perf_pending_task_sync()\n task_work_cancel() -\u0026gt; FAILED\n rcuwait_wait_event()\n\nOnce task_work_run() is running, the list of pending callbacks is\nremoved from the task_struct and from this point on task_work_cancel()\ncan\u0026apos;t remove any pending and not yet started work items, hence the\ntask_work_cancel() failure and the hang on rcuwait_wait_event().\n\nTask work could be changed to remove one work at a time, so a work\nrunning on the current task can always cancel a pending one, however\nthe wait / wake design is still subject to inverted dependencies when\nremote targets are involved, as pictured by Oleg:\n\nT1 T2\n\nfd = perf_event_open(pid =\u0026gt; T2-\u0026gt;pid); fd = perf_event_open(pid =\u0026gt; T1-\u0026gt;pid);\nclose(fd) close(fd)\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt; \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n perf_event_overflow() perf_event_overflow()\n task_work_add(perf_pending_task) task_work_add(perf_pending_task)\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt; \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n fput() fput()\n task_work_add(____fput()) task_work_add(____fput())\n\n task_work_run() task_work_run()\n ____fput() ____fput()\n perf_release() perf_release()\n perf_event_release_kernel() perf_event_release_kernel()\n _free_event() _free_event()\n perf_pending_task_sync() perf_pending_task_sync()\n rcuwait_wait_event() rcuwait_wait_event()\n\nTherefore the only option left is to acquire the event reference count\nupon queueing the perf task work and release it from the task work, just\nlike it was done before 3a5465418f5f (\u0026quot;perf: Fix event leak upon exec and file release\u0026quot;)\nbut without the leaks it fixed.\n\nSome adjustments are necessary to make it work:\n\n* A child event might dereference its parent upon freeing. Care must be\n taken to release the parent last.\n\n* Some places assuming the event doesn\u0026apos;t have any reference held and\n therefore can be freed right away must instead put the reference and\n let the reference counting to its job.(CVE-2025-37747)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI: Fix reference leak in pci_register_host_bridge()\n\nIf device_register() fails, call put_device() to give up the reference to\navoid a memory leak, per the comment at device_register().\n\nFound by code review.\n\n[bhelgaas: squash Dan Carpenter\u0026apos;s double free fix from\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/r/(CVE-2025-37836)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Fix slab-use-after-free in hdcp\n\nThe HDCP code in amdgpu_dm_hdcp.c copies pointers to amdgpu_dm_connector\nobjects without incrementing the kref reference counts. When using a\nUSB-C dock, and the dock is unplugged, the corresponding\namdgpu_dm_connector objects are freed, creating dangling pointers in the\nHDCP code. When the dock is plugged back, the dangling pointers are\ndereferenced, resulting in a slab-use-after-free:\n\n[ 66.775837] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in event_property_validate+0x42f/0x6c0 [amdgpu]\n[ 66.776171] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888127804120 by task kworker/0:1/10\n\n[ 66.776179] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 10 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7-00180-g54505f727a38-dirty #233\n[ 66.776183] Hardware name: HP HP Pavilion Aero Laptop 13-be0xxx/8916, BIOS F.17 12/18/2024\n[ 66.776186] Workqueue: events event_property_validate [amdgpu]\n[ 66.776494] Call Trace:\n[ 66.776496] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 66.776497] dump_stack_lvl+0x70/0xa0\n[ 66.776504] print_report+0x175/0x555\n[ 66.776507] ? __virt_addr_valid+0x243/0x450\n[ 66.776510] ? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x66/0x1c0\n[ 66.776515] kasan_report+0xeb/0x1c0\n[ 66.776518] ? event_property_validate+0x42f/0x6c0 [amdgpu]\n[ 66.776819] ? event_property_validate+0x42f/0x6c0 [amdgpu]\n[ 66.777121] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x14/0x20\n[ 66.777124] event_property_validate+0x42f/0x6c0 [amdgpu]\n[ 66.777342] ? __lock_acquire+0x6b40/0x6b40\n[ 66.777347] ? enable_assr+0x250/0x250 [amdgpu]\n[ 66.777571] process_one_work+0x86b/0x1510\n[ 66.777575] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0xcf0/0xcf0\n[ 66.777578] ? assign_work+0x16b/0x280\n[ 66.777580] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa3/0x130\n[ 66.777583] worker_thread+0x5c0/0xfa0\n[ 66.777587] ? process_one_work+0x1510/0x1510\n[ 66.777588] kthread+0x3a2/0x840\n[ 66.777591] ? kthread_is_per_cpu+0xd0/0xd0\n[ 66.777594] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x4f/0x60\n[ 66.777597] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x60\n[ 66.777599] ? calculate_sigpending+0x77/0xa0\n[ 66.777602] ? kthread_is_per_cpu+0xd0/0xd0\n[ 66.777605] ret_from_fork+0x40/0x90\n[ 66.777607] ? kthread_is_per_cpu+0xd0/0xd0\n[ 66.777609] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20\n[ 66.777614] \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\n[ 66.777643] Allocated by task 10:\n[ 66.777646] kasan_save_stack+0x39/0x60\n[ 66.777649] kasan_save_track+0x14/0x40\n[ 66.777652] kasan_save_alloc_info+0x37/0x50\n[ 66.777655] __kasan_kmalloc+0xbb/0xc0\n[ 66.777658] __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x1c8/0x4b0\n[ 66.777661] dm_dp_add_mst_connector+0xdd/0x5c0 [amdgpu]\n[ 66.777880] drm_dp_mst_port_add_connector+0x47e/0x770 [drm_display_helper]\n[ 66.777892] drm_dp_send_link_address+0x1554/0x2bf0 [drm_display_helper]\n[ 66.777901] drm_dp_check_and_send_link_address+0x187/0x1f0 [drm_display_helper]\n[ 66.777909] drm_dp_mst_link_probe_work+0x2b8/0x410 [drm_display_helper]\n[ 66.777917] process_one_work+0x86b/0x1510\n[ 66.777919] worker_thread+0x5c0/0xfa0\n[ 66.777922] kthread+0x3a2/0x840\n[ 66.777925] ret_from_fork+0x40/0x90\n[ 66.777927] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20\n\n[ 66.777932] Freed by task 1713:\n[ 66.777935] kasan_save_stack+0x39/0x60\n[ 66.777938] kasan_save_track+0x14/0x40\n[ 66.777940] kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60\n[ 66.777944] __kasan_slab_free+0x52/0x70\n[ 66.777946] kfree+0x13f/0x4b0\n[ 66.777949] dm_dp_mst_connector_destroy+0xfa/0x150 [amdgpu]\n[ 66.778179] drm_connector_free+0x7d/0xb0\n[ 66.778184] drm_mode_object_put.part.0+0xee/0x160\n[ 66.778188] drm_mode_object_put+0x37/0x50\n[ 66.778191] drm_atomic_state_default_clear+0x220/0xd60\n[ 66.778194] __drm_atomic_state_free+0x16e/0x2a0\n[ 66.778197] drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x15ed/0x2ba0\n[ 66.778200] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x17a/0x310\n[ 66.778203] drm_ioctl+0x584/0xd10\n[ 66.778206] amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0xd2/0x1c0 [amdgpu]\n[ 66.778375] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x139/0x1a0\n[ 66.778378] x64_sys_call+0xee7/0xfb0\n[ 66.778381] \n---truncated---(CVE-2025-37903)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nksmbd: Fix UAF in __close_file_table_ids\n\nA use-after-free is possible if one thread destroys the file\nvia __ksmbd_close_fd while another thread holds a reference to\nit. The existing checks on fp-\u0026gt;refcount are not sufficient to\nprevent this.\n\nThe fix takes ft-\u0026gt;lock around the section which removes the\nfile from the file table. This prevents two threads acquiring the\nsame file pointer via __close_file_table_ids, as well as the other\nfunctions which retrieve a file from the IDR and which already use\nthis same lock.(CVE-2025-37952)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfix a couple of races in MNT_TREE_BENEATH handling by do_move_mount()\n\nNormally do_lock_mount(path, _) is locking a mountpoint pinned by\n*path and at the time when matching unlock_mount() unlocks that\nlocation it is still pinned by the same thing.\n\nUnfortunately, for \u0026apos;beneath\u0026apos; case it\u0026apos;s no longer that simple -\nthe object being locked is not the one *path points to. It\u0026apos;s the\nmountpoint of path-\u0026gt;mnt. The thing is, without sufficient locking\n-\u0026gt;mnt_parent may change under us and none of the locks are held\nat that point. The rules are\n\t* mount_lock stabilizes m-\u0026gt;mnt_parent for any mount m.\n\t* namespace_sem stabilizes m-\u0026gt;mnt_parent, provided that\nm is mounted.\n\t* if either of the above holds and refcount of m is positive,\nwe are guaranteed the same for refcount of m-\u0026gt;mnt_parent.\n\nnamespace_sem nests inside inode_lock(), so do_lock_mount() has\nto take inode_lock() before grabbing namespace_sem. It does\nrecheck that path-\u0026gt;mnt is still mounted in the same place after\ngetting namespace_sem, and it does take care to pin the dentry.\nIt is needed, since otherwise we might end up with racing mount --move\n(or umount) happening while we were getting locks; in that case\ndentry would no longer be a mountpoint and could\u0026apos;ve been evicted\non memory pressure along with its inode - not something you want\nwhen grabbing lock on that inode.\n\nHowever, pinning a dentry is not enough - the matching mount is\nalso pinned only by the fact that path-\u0026gt;mnt is mounted on top it\nand at that point we are not holding any locks whatsoever, so\nthe same kind of races could end up with all references to\nthat mount gone just as we are about to enter inode_lock().\nIf that happens, we are left with filesystem being shut down while\nwe are holding a dentry reference on it; results are not pretty.\n\nWhat we need to do is grab both dentry and mount at the same time;\nthat makes inode_lock() safe *and* avoids the problem with fs getting\nshut down under us. After taking namespace_sem we verify that\npath-\u0026gt;mnt is still mounted (which stabilizes its -\u0026gt;mnt_parent) and\ncheck that it\u0026apos;s still mounted at the same place. From that point\non to the matching namespace_unlock() we are guaranteed that\nmount/dentry pair we\u0026apos;d grabbed are also pinned by being the mountpoint\nof path-\u0026gt;mnt, so we can quietly drop both the dentry reference (as\nthe current code does) and mnt one - it\u0026apos;s OK to do under namespace_sem,\nsince we are not dropping the final refs.\n\nThat solves the problem on do_lock_mount() side; unlock_mount()\nalso has one, since dentry is guaranteed to stay pinned only until\nthe namespace_unlock(). That\u0026apos;s easy to fix - just have inode_unlock()\ndone earlier, while it\u0026apos;s still pinned by mp-\u0026gt;m_dentry.(CVE-2025-37988)",
"id": "OESA-2025-1594",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:08:41Z",
"published": "2025-06-06T11:08:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-1594"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49947"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50080"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50140"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53175"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53188"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53200"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56568"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21676"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21919"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22028"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22104"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22109"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22127"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-23161"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37738"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37747"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37836"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37903"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37952"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37988"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2024-49947",
"CVE-2024-50080",
"CVE-2024-50140",
"CVE-2024-53175",
"CVE-2024-53188",
"CVE-2024-53200",
"CVE-2024-56568",
"CVE-2025-21676",
"CVE-2025-21919",
"CVE-2025-22028",
"CVE-2025-22104",
"CVE-2025-22109",
"CVE-2025-22127",
"CVE-2025-23161",
"CVE-2025-37738",
"CVE-2025-37747",
"CVE-2025-37836",
"CVE-2025-37903",
"CVE-2025-37952",
"CVE-2025-37988"
]
}
oesa-2025-1595
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler
The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched/core: Disable page allocation in task_tick_mm_cid()
With KASAN and PREEMPT_RT enabled, calling task_work_add() in task_tick_mm_cid() may cause the following splat.
[ 63.696416] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48 [ 63.696416] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 610, name: modprobe [ 63.696416] preempt_count: 10001, expected: 0 [ 63.696416] RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 1
This problem is caused by the following call trace.
sched_tick() [ acquire rq->__lock ] -> task_tick_mm_cid() -> task_work_add() -> __kasan_record_aux_stack() -> kasan_save_stack() -> stack_depot_save_flags() -> alloc_pages_mpol_noprof() -> __alloc_pages_noprof() -> get_page_from_freelist() -> rmqueue() -> rmqueue_pcplist() -> __rmqueue_pcplist() -> rmqueue_bulk() -> rt_spin_lock()
The rq lock is a raw_spinlock_t. We can't sleep while holding it. IOW, we can't call alloc_pages() in stack_depot_save_flags().
The task_tick_mm_cid() function with its task_work_add() call was introduced by commit 223baf9d17f2 ("sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid") in v6.4 kernel.
Fortunately, there is a kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() variant that calls stack_depot_save_flags() while not allowing it to allocate new pages. To allow task_tick_mm_cid() to use task_work without page allocation, a new TWAF_NO_ALLOC flag is added to enable calling kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() instead of kasan_record_aux_stack() if set. The task_tick_mm_cid() function is modified to add this new flag.
The possible downside is the missing stack trace in a KASAN report due to new page allocation required when task_work_add_noallloc() is called which should be rare.(CVE-2024-50140)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipc: fix memleak if msg_init_ns failed in create_ipc_ns
Percpu memory allocation may failed during create_ipc_ns however this fail is not handled properly since ipc sysctls and mq sysctls is not released properly. Fix this by release these two resource when failure.
Here is the kmemleak stack when percpu failed:
unreferenced object 0xffff88819de2a600 (size 512): comm "shmem_2nstest", pid 120711, jiffies 4300542254 hex dump (first 32 bytes): 60 aa 9d 84 ff ff ff ff fc 18 48 b2 84 88 ff ff `.........H..... 04 00 00 00 a4 01 00 00 20 e4 56 81 ff ff ff ff ........ .V..... backtrace (crc be7cba35): [<ffffffff81b43f83>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof+0x333/0x420 [<ffffffff81a52e56>] kmemdup_noprof+0x26/0x50 [<ffffffff821b2f37>] setup_mq_sysctls+0x57/0x1d0 [<ffffffff821b29cc>] copy_ipcs+0x29c/0x3b0 [<ffffffff815d6a10>] create_new_namespaces+0x1d0/0x920 [<ffffffff815d7449>] copy_namespaces+0x2e9/0x3e0 [<ffffffff815458f3>] copy_process+0x29f3/0x7ff0 [<ffffffff8154b080>] kernel_clone+0xc0/0x650 [<ffffffff8154b6b1>] __do_sys_clone+0xa1/0xe0 [<ffffffff843df8ff>] do_syscall_64+0xbf/0x1c0 [<ffffffff846000b0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53(CVE-2024-53175)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: ath12k: fix crash when unbinding
If there is an error during some initialization related to firmware, the function ath12k_dp_cc_cleanup is called to release resources. However this is released again when the device is unbinded (ath12k_pci), and we get: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000020 at RIP: 0010:ath12k_dp_cc_cleanup.part.0+0xb6/0x500 [ath12k] Call Trace: ath12k_dp_cc_cleanup ath12k_dp_free ath12k_core_deinit ath12k_pci_remove ...
The issue is always reproducible from a VM because the MSI addressing initialization is failing.
In order to fix the issue, just set to NULL the released structure in ath12k_dp_cc_cleanup at the end.(CVE-2024-53188)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Fix null check for pipe_ctx->plane_state in hwss_setup_dpp
This commit addresses a null pointer dereference issue in
hwss_setup_dpp(). The issue could occur when pipe_ctx->plane_state is
null. The fix adds a check to ensure pipe_ctx->plane_state is not null
before accessing. This prevents a null pointer dereference.(CVE-2024-53200)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iommu/arm-smmu: Defer probe of clients after smmu device bound
Null pointer dereference occurs due to a race between smmu driver probe and client driver probe, when of_dma_configure() for client is called after the iommu_device_register() for smmu driver probe has executed but before the driver_bound() for smmu driver has been called.
Following is how the race occurs:
T1:Smmu device probe T2: Client device probe
really_probe() arm_smmu_device_probe() iommu_device_register() really_probe() platform_dma_configure() of_dma_configure() of_dma_configure_id() of_iommu_configure() iommu_probe_device() iommu_init_device() arm_smmu_probe_device() arm_smmu_get_by_fwnode() driver_find_device_by_fwnode() driver_find_device() next_device() klist_next() / null ptr assigned to smmu / / null ptr dereference while smmu->streamid_mask / driver_bound() klist_add_tail()
When this null smmu pointer is dereferenced later in arm_smmu_probe_device, the device crashes.
Fix this by deferring the probe of the client device until the smmu device has bound to the arm smmu driver.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: fec: handle page_pool_dev_alloc_pages error
The fec_enet_update_cbd function calls page_pool_dev_alloc_pages but did not handle the case when it returned NULL. There was a WARN_ON(!new_page) but it would still proceed to use the NULL pointer and then crash.
This case does seem somewhat rare but when the system is under memory pressure it can happen. One case where I can duplicate this with some frequency is when writing over a smbd share to a SATA HDD attached to an imx6q.
Setting /proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes to higher values also seems to solve the problem for my test case. But it still seems wrong that the fec driver ignores the memory allocation error and can crash.
This commit handles the allocation error by dropping the current packet.(CVE-2025-21676)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched/fair: Fix potential memory corruption in child_cfs_rq_on_list
child_cfs_rq_on_list attempts to convert a 'prev' pointer to a cfs_rq. This 'prev' pointer can originate from struct rq's leaf_cfs_rq_list, making the conversion invalid and potentially leading to memory corruption. Depending on the relative positions of leaf_cfs_rq_list and the task group (tg) pointer within the struct, this can cause a memory fault or access garbage data.
The issue arises in list_add_leaf_cfs_rq, where both cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list and rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list are added to the same leaf list. Also, rq->tmp_alone_branch can be set to rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list.
This adds a check if (prev == &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list) after the main
conditional in child_cfs_rq_on_list. This ensures that the container_of
operation will convert a correct cfs_rq struct.
This check is sufficient because only cfs_rqs on the same CPU are added to the list, so verifying the 'prev' pointer against the current rq's list head is enough.
Fixes a potential memory corruption issue that due to current struct layout might not be manifesting as a crash but could lead to unpredictable behavior when the layout changes.(CVE-2025-21919)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: vimc: skip .s_stream() for stopped entities
Syzbot reported [1] a warning prompted by a check in call_s_stream() that checks whether .s_stream() operation is warranted for unstarted or stopped subdevs.
Add a simple fix in vimc_streamer_pipeline_terminate() ensuring that entities skip a call to .s_stream() unless they have been previously properly started.
[1] Syzbot report: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5933 at drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c:460 call_s_stream+0x2df/0x350 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c:460 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5933 Comm: syz-executor330 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-syzkaller-00362-g2d8308bf5b67 #0 ... Call Trace: <TASK> vimc_streamer_pipeline_terminate+0x218/0x320 drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-streamer.c:62 vimc_streamer_pipeline_init drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-streamer.c:101 [inline] vimc_streamer_s_stream+0x650/0x9a0 drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-streamer.c:203 vimc_capture_start_streaming+0xa1/0x130 drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-capture.c:256 vb2_start_streaming+0x15f/0x5a0 drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c:1789 vb2_core_streamon+0x2a7/0x450 drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c:2348 vb2_streamon drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c:875 [inline] vb2_ioctl_streamon+0xf4/0x170 drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c:1118 __video_do_ioctl+0xaf0/0xf00 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c:3122 video_usercopy+0x4d2/0x1620 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c:3463 v4l2_ioctl+0x1ba/0x250 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dev.c:366 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:892 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x190/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f2b85c01b19 ...(CVE-2025-22028)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ibmvnic: Use kernel helpers for hex dumps
Previously, when the driver was printing hex dumps, the buffer was cast to an 8 byte long and printed using string formatters. If the buffer size was not a multiple of 8 then a read buffer overflow was possible.
Therefore, create a new ibmvnic function that loops over a buffer and calls hex_dump_to_buffer instead.
This patch address KASAN reports like the one below: ibmvnic 30000003 env3: Login Buffer: ibmvnic 30000003 env3: 01000000af000000 <...> ibmvnic 30000003 env3: 2e6d62692e736261 ibmvnic 30000003 env3: 65050003006d6f63 ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ibmvnic_login+0xacc/0xffc [ibmvnic] Read of size 8 at addr c0000001331a9aa8 by task ip/17681 <...> Allocated by task 17681: <...> ibmvnic_login+0x2f0/0xffc [ibmvnic] ibmvnic_open+0x148/0x308 [ibmvnic] __dev_open+0x1ac/0x304 <...> The buggy address is located 168 bytes inside of allocated 175-byte region [c0000001331a9a00, c0000001331a9aaf) <...> ================================================================= ibmvnic 30000003 env3: 000000000033766e(CVE-2025-22104)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ax25: Remove broken autobind
Binding AX25 socket by using the autobind feature leads to memory leaks in ax25_connect() and also refcount leaks in ax25_release(). Memory leak was detected with kmemleak:
================================================================ unreferenced object 0xffff8880253cd680 (size 96): backtrace: __kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof (./include/linux/kmemleak.h:43) kmemdup_noprof (mm/util.c:136) ax25_rt_autobind (net/ax25/ax25_route.c:428) ax25_connect (net/ax25/af_ax25.c:1282) __sys_connect_file (net/socket.c:2045) __sys_connect (net/socket.c:2064) __x64_sys_connect (net/socket.c:2067) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130) ================================================================
When socket is bound, refcounts must be incremented the way it is done in ax25_bind() and ax25_setsockopt() (SO_BINDTODEVICE). In case of autobind, the refcounts are not incremented.
This bug leads to the following issue reported by Syzkaller:
================================================================ ax25_connect(): syz-executor318 uses autobind, please contact (CVE-2025-22109)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix potential deadloop in prepare_compress_overwrite()
Jan Prusakowski reported a kernel hang issue as below:
When running xfstests on linux-next kernel (6.14.0-rc3, 6.12) I encountered a problem in generic/475 test where fsstress process gets blocked in __f2fs_write_data_pages() and the test hangs. The options I used are:
MKFS_OPTIONS -- -O compression -O extra_attr -O project_quota -O quota /dev/vdc MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr -o discard,compress_extension=* /dev/vdc /vdc
INFO: task kworker/u8:0:11 blocked for more than 122 seconds. Not tainted 6.14.0-rc3-xfstests-lockdep #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u8:0 state:D stack:0 pid:11 tgid:11 ppid:2 task_flags:0x4208160 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-253:0) Call Trace: <TASK> __schedule+0x309/0x8e0 schedule+0x3a/0x100 schedule_preempt_disabled+0x15/0x30 __mutex_lock+0x59a/0xdb0 __f2fs_write_data_pages+0x3ac/0x400 do_writepages+0xe8/0x290 __writeback_single_inode+0x5c/0x360 writeback_sb_inodes+0x22f/0x570 wb_writeback+0xb0/0x410 wb_do_writeback+0x47/0x2f0 wb_workfn+0x5a/0x1c0 process_one_work+0x223/0x5b0 worker_thread+0x1d5/0x3c0 kthread+0xfd/0x230 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>
The root cause is: once generic/475 starts toload error table to dm device, f2fs_prepare_compress_overwrite() will loop reading compressed cluster pages due to IO error, meanwhile it has held .writepages lock, it can block all other writeback tasks.
Let's fix this issue w/ below changes: - add f2fs_handle_page_eio() in prepare_compress_overwrite() to detect IO error. - detect cp_error earler in f2fs_read_multi_pages().(CVE-2025-22127)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI: vmd: Make vmd_dev::cfg_lock a raw_spinlock_t type
The access to the PCI config space via pci_ops::read and pci_ops::write is a low-level hardware access. The functions can be accessed with disabled interrupts even on PREEMPT_RT. The pci_lock is a raw_spinlock_t for this purpose.
A spinlock_t becomes a sleeping lock on PREEMPT_RT, so it cannot be acquired with disabled interrupts. The vmd_dev::cfg_lock is accessed in the same context as the pci_lock.
Make vmd_dev::cfg_lock a raw_spinlock_t type so it can be used with interrupts disabled.
This was reported as:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48 Call Trace: rt_spin_lock+0x4e/0x130 vmd_pci_read+0x8d/0x100 [vmd] pci_user_read_config_byte+0x6f/0xe0 pci_read_config+0xfe/0x290 sysfs_kf_bin_read+0x68/0x90
[bigeasy: reword commit message] Tested-off-by: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves <(CVE-2025-23161)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: ignore xattrs past end
Once inside 'ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all' we should ignore xattrs entries past the 'end' entry.
This fixes the following KASAN reported issue:
================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0xb8c/0xe90 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888012c120c4 by task repro/2065
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2065 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2+ #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x1fd/0x300 ? tcp_gro_dev_warn+0x260/0x260 ? _printk+0xc0/0x100 ? read_lock_is_recursive+0x10/0x10 ? irq_work_queue+0x72/0xf0 ? __virt_addr_valid+0x17b/0x4b0 print_address_description+0x78/0x390 print_report+0x107/0x1f0 ? __virt_addr_valid+0x17b/0x4b0 ? __virt_addr_valid+0x3ff/0x4b0 ? __phys_addr+0xb5/0x160 ? ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0xb8c/0xe90 kasan_report+0xcc/0x100 ? ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0xb8c/0xe90 ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0xb8c/0xe90 ? ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0xd30/0xd30 ? __ext4_journal_ensure_credits+0x5f0/0x5f0 ? __ext4_journal_ensure_credits+0x2b/0x5f0 ? inode_update_timestamps+0x410/0x410 ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0xb64/0xd30 ? ext4_truncate+0xb70/0xdc0 ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x1d20/0x1d20 ? __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x670/0x670 ? ext4_journal_check_start+0x16f/0x240 ? ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink+0x2f2/0x3a0 ext4_evict_inode+0xc8c/0xff0 ? ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink+0x3a0/0x3a0 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x53/0x8a0 ? ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink+0x3a0/0x3a0 evict+0x4ac/0x950 ? proc_nr_inodes+0x310/0x310 ? trace_ext4_drop_inode+0xa2/0x220 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1a/0x30 ? iput+0x4cb/0x7e0 do_unlinkat+0x495/0x7c0 ? try_break_deleg+0x120/0x120 ? 0xffffffff81000000 ? __check_object_size+0x15a/0x210 ? strncpy_from_user+0x13e/0x250 ? getname_flags+0x1dc/0x530 __x64_sys_unlinkat+0xc8/0xf0 do_syscall_64+0x65/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0x6f RIP: 0033:0x434ffd Code: 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 8 RSP: 002b:00007ffc50fa7b28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000107 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc50fa7e18 RCX: 0000000000434ffd RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000240 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00007ffc50fa7be0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 00007ffc50fa7e08 R14: 00000000004bbf30 R15: 0000000000000001 </TASK>
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888012c12000 which belongs to the cache filp of size 360 The buggy address is located 196 bytes inside of freed 360-byte region [ffff888012c12000, ffff888012c12168)
The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x12c12 head: order:1 mapcount:0 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0 pincount:0 flags: 0x40(head|node=0|zone=0) page_type: f5(slab) raw: 0000000000000040 ffff888000ad7640 ffffea0000497a00 dead000000000004 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000100010 00000001f5000000 0000000000000000 head: 0000000000000040 ffff888000ad7640 ffffea0000497a00 dead000000000004 head: 0000000000000000 0000000000100010 00000001f5000000 0000000000000000 head: 0000000000000001 ffffea00004b0481 ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000000 head: 0000000000000002 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
Memory state around the buggy address: ffff888012c11f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff888012c12000: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb > ffff888012c12080: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ^ ffff888012c12100: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc ffff888012c12180: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc ---truncated---(CVE-2025-37738)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
perf: Fix hang while freeing sigtrap event
Perf can hang while freeing a sigtrap event if a related deferred signal hadn't managed to be sent before the file got closed:
perf_event_overflow() task_work_add(perf_pending_task)
fput() task_work_add(____fput())
task_work_run() ____fput() perf_release() perf_event_release_kernel() _free_event() perf_pending_task_sync() task_work_cancel() -> FAILED rcuwait_wait_event()
Once task_work_run() is running, the list of pending callbacks is removed from the task_struct and from this point on task_work_cancel() can't remove any pending and not yet started work items, hence the task_work_cancel() failure and the hang on rcuwait_wait_event().
Task work could be changed to remove one work at a time, so a work running on the current task can always cancel a pending one, however the wait / wake design is still subject to inverted dependencies when remote targets are involved, as pictured by Oleg:
T1 T2
fd = perf_event_open(pid => T2->pid); fd = perf_event_open(pid => T1->pid); close(fd) close(fd) <IRQ> <IRQ> perf_event_overflow() perf_event_overflow() task_work_add(perf_pending_task) task_work_add(perf_pending_task) </IRQ> </IRQ> fput() fput() task_work_add(_fput()) taskwork_add(__fput())
task_work_run() task_work_run()
____fput() ____fput()
perf_release() perf_release()
perf_event_release_kernel() perf_event_release_kernel()
_free_event() _free_event()
perf_pending_task_sync() perf_pending_task_sync()
rcuwait_wait_event() rcuwait_wait_event()
Therefore the only option left is to acquire the event reference count upon queueing the perf task work and release it from the task work, just like it was done before 3a5465418f5f ("perf: Fix event leak upon exec and file release") but without the leaks it fixed.
Some adjustments are necessary to make it work:
-
A child event might dereference its parent upon freeing. Care must be taken to release the parent last.
-
Some places assuming the event doesn't have any reference held and therefore can be freed right away must instead put the reference and let the reference counting to its job.(CVE-2025-37747)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
PCI: Fix reference leak in pci_register_host_bridge()
If device_register() fails, call put_device() to give up the reference to avoid a memory leak, per the comment at device_register().
Found by code review.
[bhelgaas: squash Dan Carpenter's double free fix from https://lore.kernel.org/r/(CVE-2025-37836)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Fix slab-use-after-free in hdcp
The HDCP code in amdgpu_dm_hdcp.c copies pointers to amdgpu_dm_connector objects without incrementing the kref reference counts. When using a USB-C dock, and the dock is unplugged, the corresponding amdgpu_dm_connector objects are freed, creating dangling pointers in the HDCP code. When the dock is plugged back, the dangling pointers are dereferenced, resulting in a slab-use-after-free:
[ 66.775837] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in event_property_validate+0x42f/0x6c0 [amdgpu] [ 66.776171] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888127804120 by task kworker/0:1/10
[ 66.776179] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 10 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7-00180-g54505f727a38-dirty #233 [ 66.776183] Hardware name: HP HP Pavilion Aero Laptop 13-be0xxx/8916, BIOS F.17 12/18/2024 [ 66.776186] Workqueue: events event_property_validate [amdgpu] [ 66.776494] Call Trace: [ 66.776496] <TASK> [ 66.776497] dump_stack_lvl+0x70/0xa0 [ 66.776504] print_report+0x175/0x555 [ 66.776507] ? __virt_addr_valid+0x243/0x450 [ 66.776510] ? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x66/0x1c0 [ 66.776515] kasan_report+0xeb/0x1c0 [ 66.776518] ? event_property_validate+0x42f/0x6c0 [amdgpu] [ 66.776819] ? event_property_validate+0x42f/0x6c0 [amdgpu] [ 66.777121] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x14/0x20 [ 66.777124] event_property_validate+0x42f/0x6c0 [amdgpu] [ 66.777342] ? __lock_acquire+0x6b40/0x6b40 [ 66.777347] ? enable_assr+0x250/0x250 [amdgpu] [ 66.777571] process_one_work+0x86b/0x1510 [ 66.777575] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0xcf0/0xcf0 [ 66.777578] ? assign_work+0x16b/0x280 [ 66.777580] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa3/0x130 [ 66.777583] worker_thread+0x5c0/0xfa0 [ 66.777587] ? process_one_work+0x1510/0x1510 [ 66.777588] kthread+0x3a2/0x840 [ 66.777591] ? kthread_is_per_cpu+0xd0/0xd0 [ 66.777594] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x4f/0x60 [ 66.777597] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x60 [ 66.777599] ? calculate_sigpending+0x77/0xa0 [ 66.777602] ? kthread_is_per_cpu+0xd0/0xd0 [ 66.777605] ret_from_fork+0x40/0x90 [ 66.777607] ? kthread_is_per_cpu+0xd0/0xd0 [ 66.777609] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 66.777614] </TASK>
[ 66.777643] Allocated by task 10: [ 66.777646] kasan_save_stack+0x39/0x60 [ 66.777649] kasan_save_track+0x14/0x40 [ 66.777652] kasan_save_alloc_info+0x37/0x50 [ 66.777655] __kasan_kmalloc+0xbb/0xc0 [ 66.777658] __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x1c8/0x4b0 [ 66.777661] dm_dp_add_mst_connector+0xdd/0x5c0 [amdgpu] [ 66.777880] drm_dp_mst_port_add_connector+0x47e/0x770 [drm_display_helper] [ 66.777892] drm_dp_send_link_address+0x1554/0x2bf0 [drm_display_helper] [ 66.777901] drm_dp_check_and_send_link_address+0x187/0x1f0 [drm_display_helper] [ 66.777909] drm_dp_mst_link_probe_work+0x2b8/0x410 [drm_display_helper] [ 66.777917] process_one_work+0x86b/0x1510 [ 66.777919] worker_thread+0x5c0/0xfa0 [ 66.777922] kthread+0x3a2/0x840 [ 66.777925] ret_from_fork+0x40/0x90 [ 66.777927] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
[ 66.777932] Freed by task 1713: [ 66.777935] kasan_save_stack+0x39/0x60 [ 66.777938] kasan_save_track+0x14/0x40 [ 66.777940] kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60 [ 66.777944] __kasan_slab_free+0x52/0x70 [ 66.777946] kfree+0x13f/0x4b0 [ 66.777949] dm_dp_mst_connector_destroy+0xfa/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 66.778179] drm_connector_free+0x7d/0xb0 [ 66.778184] drm_mode_object_put.part.0+0xee/0x160 [ 66.778188] drm_mode_object_put+0x37/0x50 [ 66.778191] drm_atomic_state_default_clear+0x220/0xd60 [ 66.778194] __drm_atomic_state_free+0x16e/0x2a0 [ 66.778197] drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x15ed/0x2ba0 [ 66.778200] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x17a/0x310 [ 66.778203] drm_ioctl+0x584/0xd10 [ 66.778206] amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0xd2/0x1c0 [amdgpu] [ 66.778375] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x139/0x1a0 [ 66.778378] x64_sys_call+0xee7/0xfb0 [ 66.778381] ---truncated---(CVE-2025-37903)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: Fix UAF in __close_file_table_ids
A use-after-free is possible if one thread destroys the file via __ksmbd_close_fd while another thread holds a reference to it. The existing checks on fp->refcount are not sufficient to prevent this.
The fix takes ft->lock around the section which removes the file from the file table. This prevents two threads acquiring the same file pointer via __close_file_table_ids, as well as the other functions which retrieve a file from the IDR and which already use this same lock.(CVE-2025-37952)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fix a couple of races in MNT_TREE_BENEATH handling by do_move_mount()
Normally do_lock_mount(path, _) is locking a mountpoint pinned by *path and at the time when matching unlock_mount() unlocks that location it is still pinned by the same thing.
Unfortunately, for 'beneath' case it's no longer that simple - the object being locked is not the one *path points to. It's the mountpoint of path->mnt. The thing is, without sufficient locking ->mnt_parent may change under us and none of the locks are held at that point. The rules are * mount_lock stabilizes m->mnt_parent for any mount m. * namespace_sem stabilizes m->mnt_parent, provided that m is mounted. * if either of the above holds and refcount of m is positive, we are guaranteed the same for refcount of m->mnt_parent.
namespace_sem nests inside inode_lock(), so do_lock_mount() has to take inode_lock() before grabbing namespace_sem. It does recheck that path->mnt is still mounted in the same place after getting namespace_sem, and it does take care to pin the dentry. It is needed, since otherwise we might end up with racing mount --move (or umount) happening while we were getting locks; in that case dentry would no longer be a mountpoint and could've been evicted on memory pressure along with its inode - not something you want when grabbing lock on that inode.
However, pinning a dentry is not enough - the matching mount is also pinned only by the fact that path->mnt is mounted on top it and at that point we are not holding any locks whatsoever, so the same kind of races could end up with all references to that mount gone just as we are about to enter inode_lock(). If that happens, we are left with filesystem being shut down while we are holding a dentry reference on it; results are not pretty.
What we need to do is grab both dentry and mount at the same time; that makes inode_lock() safe and avoids the problem with fs getting shut down under us. After taking namespace_sem we verify that path->mnt is still mounted (which stabilizes its ->mnt_parent) and check that it's still mounted at the same place. From that point on to the matching namespace_unlock() we are guaranteed that mount/dentry pair we'd grabbed are also pinned by being the mountpoint of path->mnt, so we can quietly drop both the dentry reference (as the current code does) and mnt one - it's OK to do under namespace_sem, since we are not dropping the final refs.
That solves the problem on do_lock_mount() side; unlock_mount() also has one, since dentry is guaranteed to stay pinned only until the namespace_unlock(). That's easy to fix - just have inode_unlock() done earlier, while it's still pinned by mp->m_dentry.(CVE-2025-37988)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-95.0.0.99.oe2403sp1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsched/core: Disable page allocation in task_tick_mm_cid()\n\nWith KASAN and PREEMPT_RT enabled, calling task_work_add() in\ntask_tick_mm_cid() may cause the following splat.\n\n[ 63.696416] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48\n[ 63.696416] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 610, name: modprobe\n[ 63.696416] preempt_count: 10001, expected: 0\n[ 63.696416] RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 1\n\nThis problem is caused by the following call trace.\n\n sched_tick() [ acquire rq-\u0026gt;__lock ]\n -\u0026gt; task_tick_mm_cid()\n -\u0026gt; task_work_add()\n -\u0026gt; __kasan_record_aux_stack()\n -\u0026gt; kasan_save_stack()\n -\u0026gt; stack_depot_save_flags()\n -\u0026gt; alloc_pages_mpol_noprof()\n -\u0026gt; __alloc_pages_noprof()\n\t -\u0026gt; get_page_from_freelist()\n\t -\u0026gt; rmqueue()\n\t -\u0026gt; rmqueue_pcplist()\n\t -\u0026gt; __rmqueue_pcplist()\n\t -\u0026gt; rmqueue_bulk()\n\t -\u0026gt; rt_spin_lock()\n\nThe rq lock is a raw_spinlock_t. We can\u0026apos;t sleep while holding\nit. IOW, we can\u0026apos;t call alloc_pages() in stack_depot_save_flags().\n\nThe task_tick_mm_cid() function with its task_work_add() call was\nintroduced by commit 223baf9d17f2 (\u0026quot;sched: Fix performance regression\nintroduced by mm_cid\u0026quot;) in v6.4 kernel.\n\nFortunately, there is a kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() variant that\ncalls stack_depot_save_flags() while not allowing it to allocate\nnew pages. To allow task_tick_mm_cid() to use task_work without\npage allocation, a new TWAF_NO_ALLOC flag is added to enable calling\nkasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() instead of kasan_record_aux_stack()\nif set. The task_tick_mm_cid() function is modified to add this new flag.\n\nThe possible downside is the missing stack trace in a KASAN report due\nto new page allocation required when task_work_add_noallloc() is called\nwhich should be rare.(CVE-2024-50140)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipc: fix memleak if msg_init_ns failed in create_ipc_ns\n\nPercpu memory allocation may failed during create_ipc_ns however this\nfail is not handled properly since ipc sysctls and mq sysctls is not\nreleased properly. Fix this by release these two resource when failure.\n\nHere is the kmemleak stack when percpu failed:\n\nunreferenced object 0xffff88819de2a600 (size 512):\n comm \u0026quot;shmem_2nstest\u0026quot;, pid 120711, jiffies 4300542254\n hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 60 aa 9d 84 ff ff ff ff fc 18 48 b2 84 88 ff ff `.........H.....\n 04 00 00 00 a4 01 00 00 20 e4 56 81 ff ff ff ff ........ .V.....\n backtrace (crc be7cba35):\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff81b43f83\u0026gt;] __kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof+0x333/0x420\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff81a52e56\u0026gt;] kmemdup_noprof+0x26/0x50\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff821b2f37\u0026gt;] setup_mq_sysctls+0x57/0x1d0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff821b29cc\u0026gt;] copy_ipcs+0x29c/0x3b0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff815d6a10\u0026gt;] create_new_namespaces+0x1d0/0x920\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff815d7449\u0026gt;] copy_namespaces+0x2e9/0x3e0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff815458f3\u0026gt;] copy_process+0x29f3/0x7ff0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff8154b080\u0026gt;] kernel_clone+0xc0/0x650\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff8154b6b1\u0026gt;] __do_sys_clone+0xa1/0xe0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff843df8ff\u0026gt;] do_syscall_64+0xbf/0x1c0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff846000b0\u0026gt;] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53(CVE-2024-53175)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: ath12k: fix crash when unbinding\n\nIf there is an error during some initialization related to firmware,\nthe function ath12k_dp_cc_cleanup is called to release resources.\nHowever this is released again when the device is unbinded (ath12k_pci),\nand we get:\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000020\nat RIP: 0010:ath12k_dp_cc_cleanup.part.0+0xb6/0x500 [ath12k]\nCall Trace:\nath12k_dp_cc_cleanup\nath12k_dp_free\nath12k_core_deinit\nath12k_pci_remove\n...\n\nThe issue is always reproducible from a VM because the MSI addressing\ninitialization is failing.\n\nIn order to fix the issue, just set to NULL the released structure in\nath12k_dp_cc_cleanup at the end.(CVE-2024-53188)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Fix null check for pipe_ctx-\u0026gt;plane_state in hwss_setup_dpp\n\nThis commit addresses a null pointer dereference issue in\nhwss_setup_dpp(). The issue could occur when pipe_ctx-\u0026gt;plane_state is\nnull. The fix adds a check to ensure `pipe_ctx-\u0026gt;plane_state` is not null\nbefore accessing. This prevents a null pointer dereference.(CVE-2024-53200)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\niommu/arm-smmu: Defer probe of clients after smmu device bound\n\nNull pointer dereference occurs due to a race between smmu\ndriver probe and client driver probe, when of_dma_configure()\nfor client is called after the iommu_device_register() for smmu driver\nprobe has executed but before the driver_bound() for smmu driver\nhas been called.\n\nFollowing is how the race occurs:\n\nT1:Smmu device probe\t\tT2: Client device probe\n\nreally_probe()\narm_smmu_device_probe()\niommu_device_register()\n\t\t\t\t\treally_probe()\n\t\t\t\t\tplatform_dma_configure()\n\t\t\t\t\tof_dma_configure()\n\t\t\t\t\tof_dma_configure_id()\n\t\t\t\t\tof_iommu_configure()\n\t\t\t\t\tiommu_probe_device()\n\t\t\t\t\tiommu_init_device()\n\t\t\t\t\tarm_smmu_probe_device()\n\t\t\t\t\tarm_smmu_get_by_fwnode()\n\t\t\t\t\t\tdriver_find_device_by_fwnode()\n\t\t\t\t\t\tdriver_find_device()\n\t\t\t\t\t\tnext_device()\n\t\t\t\t\t\tklist_next()\n\t\t\t\t\t\t /* null ptr\n\t\t\t\t\t\t assigned to smmu */\n\t\t\t\t\t/* null ptr dereference\n\t\t\t\t\t while smmu-\u0026gt;streamid_mask */\ndriver_bound()\n\tklist_add_tail()\n\nWhen this null smmu pointer is dereferenced later in\narm_smmu_probe_device, the device crashes.\n\nFix this by deferring the probe of the client device\nuntil the smmu device has bound to the arm smmu driver.\n\n[will: Add comment](CVE-2024-56568)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: fec: handle page_pool_dev_alloc_pages error\n\nThe fec_enet_update_cbd function calls page_pool_dev_alloc_pages but did\nnot handle the case when it returned NULL. There was a WARN_ON(!new_page)\nbut it would still proceed to use the NULL pointer and then crash.\n\nThis case does seem somewhat rare but when the system is under memory\npressure it can happen. One case where I can duplicate this with some\nfrequency is when writing over a smbd share to a SATA HDD attached to an\nimx6q.\n\nSetting /proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes to higher values also seems to solve\nthe problem for my test case. But it still seems wrong that the fec driver\nignores the memory allocation error and can crash.\n\nThis commit handles the allocation error by dropping the current packet.(CVE-2025-21676)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsched/fair: Fix potential memory corruption in child_cfs_rq_on_list\n\nchild_cfs_rq_on_list attempts to convert a \u0026apos;prev\u0026apos; pointer to a cfs_rq.\nThis \u0026apos;prev\u0026apos; pointer can originate from struct rq\u0026apos;s leaf_cfs_rq_list,\nmaking the conversion invalid and potentially leading to memory\ncorruption. Depending on the relative positions of leaf_cfs_rq_list and\nthe task group (tg) pointer within the struct, this can cause a memory\nfault or access garbage data.\n\nThe issue arises in list_add_leaf_cfs_rq, where both\ncfs_rq-\u0026gt;leaf_cfs_rq_list and rq-\u0026gt;leaf_cfs_rq_list are added to the same\nleaf list. Also, rq-\u0026gt;tmp_alone_branch can be set to rq-\u0026gt;leaf_cfs_rq_list.\n\nThis adds a check `if (prev == \u0026amp;rq-\u0026gt;leaf_cfs_rq_list)` after the main\nconditional in child_cfs_rq_on_list. This ensures that the container_of\noperation will convert a correct cfs_rq struct.\n\nThis check is sufficient because only cfs_rqs on the same CPU are added\nto the list, so verifying the \u0026apos;prev\u0026apos; pointer against the current rq\u0026apos;s list\nhead is enough.\n\nFixes a potential memory corruption issue that due to current struct\nlayout might not be manifesting as a crash but could lead to unpredictable\nbehavior when the layout changes.(CVE-2025-21919)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: vimc: skip .s_stream() for stopped entities\n\nSyzbot reported [1] a warning prompted by a check in call_s_stream()\nthat checks whether .s_stream() operation is warranted for unstarted\nor stopped subdevs.\n\nAdd a simple fix in vimc_streamer_pipeline_terminate() ensuring that\nentities skip a call to .s_stream() unless they have been previously\nproperly started.\n\n[1] Syzbot report:\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5933 at drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c:460 call_s_stream+0x2df/0x350 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c:460\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5933 Comm: syz-executor330 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-syzkaller-00362-g2d8308bf5b67 #0\n...\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n vimc_streamer_pipeline_terminate+0x218/0x320 drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-streamer.c:62\n vimc_streamer_pipeline_init drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-streamer.c:101 [inline]\n vimc_streamer_s_stream+0x650/0x9a0 drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-streamer.c:203\n vimc_capture_start_streaming+0xa1/0x130 drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-capture.c:256\n vb2_start_streaming+0x15f/0x5a0 drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c:1789\n vb2_core_streamon+0x2a7/0x450 drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c:2348\n vb2_streamon drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c:875 [inline]\n vb2_ioctl_streamon+0xf4/0x170 drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c:1118\n __video_do_ioctl+0xaf0/0xf00 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c:3122\n video_usercopy+0x4d2/0x1620 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c:3463\n v4l2_ioctl+0x1ba/0x250 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dev.c:366\n vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]\n __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]\n __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:892 [inline]\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x190/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:892\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\nRIP: 0033:0x7f2b85c01b19\n...(CVE-2025-22028)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nibmvnic: Use kernel helpers for hex dumps\n\nPreviously, when the driver was printing hex dumps, the buffer was cast\nto an 8 byte long and printed using string formatters. If the buffer\nsize was not a multiple of 8 then a read buffer overflow was possible.\n\nTherefore, create a new ibmvnic function that loops over a buffer and\ncalls hex_dump_to_buffer instead.\n\nThis patch address KASAN reports like the one below:\n ibmvnic 30000003 env3: Login Buffer:\n ibmvnic 30000003 env3: 01000000af000000\n \u0026lt;...\u0026gt;\n ibmvnic 30000003 env3: 2e6d62692e736261\n ibmvnic 30000003 env3: 65050003006d6f63\n ==================================================================\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ibmvnic_login+0xacc/0xffc [ibmvnic]\n Read of size 8 at addr c0000001331a9aa8 by task ip/17681\n \u0026lt;...\u0026gt;\n Allocated by task 17681:\n \u0026lt;...\u0026gt;\n ibmvnic_login+0x2f0/0xffc [ibmvnic]\n ibmvnic_open+0x148/0x308 [ibmvnic]\n __dev_open+0x1ac/0x304\n \u0026lt;...\u0026gt;\n The buggy address is located 168 bytes inside of\n allocated 175-byte region [c0000001331a9a00, c0000001331a9aaf)\n \u0026lt;...\u0026gt;\n =================================================================\n ibmvnic 30000003 env3: 000000000033766e(CVE-2025-22104)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nax25: Remove broken autobind\n\nBinding AX25 socket by using the autobind feature leads to memory leaks\nin ax25_connect() and also refcount leaks in ax25_release(). Memory\nleak was detected with kmemleak:\n\n================================================================\nunreferenced object 0xffff8880253cd680 (size 96):\nbacktrace:\n__kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof (./include/linux/kmemleak.h:43)\nkmemdup_noprof (mm/util.c:136)\nax25_rt_autobind (net/ax25/ax25_route.c:428)\nax25_connect (net/ax25/af_ax25.c:1282)\n__sys_connect_file (net/socket.c:2045)\n__sys_connect (net/socket.c:2064)\n__x64_sys_connect (net/socket.c:2067)\ndo_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83)\nentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)\n================================================================\n\nWhen socket is bound, refcounts must be incremented the way it is done\nin ax25_bind() and ax25_setsockopt() (SO_BINDTODEVICE). In case of\nautobind, the refcounts are not incremented.\n\nThis bug leads to the following issue reported by Syzkaller:\n\n================================================================\nax25_connect(): syz-executor318 uses autobind, please contact (CVE-2025-22109)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nf2fs: fix potential deadloop in prepare_compress_overwrite()\n\nJan Prusakowski reported a kernel hang issue as below:\n\nWhen running xfstests on linux-next kernel (6.14.0-rc3, 6.12) I\nencountered a problem in generic/475 test where fsstress process\ngets blocked in __f2fs_write_data_pages() and the test hangs.\nThe options I used are:\n\nMKFS_OPTIONS -- -O compression -O extra_attr -O project_quota -O quota /dev/vdc\nMOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr -o discard,compress_extension=* /dev/vdc /vdc\n\nINFO: task kworker/u8:0:11 blocked for more than 122 seconds.\n Not tainted 6.14.0-rc3-xfstests-lockdep #1\n\u0026quot;echo 0 \u0026gt; /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs\u0026quot; disables this message.\ntask:kworker/u8:0 state:D stack:0 pid:11 tgid:11 ppid:2 task_flags:0x4208160 flags:0x00004000\nWorkqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-253:0)\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __schedule+0x309/0x8e0\n schedule+0x3a/0x100\n schedule_preempt_disabled+0x15/0x30\n __mutex_lock+0x59a/0xdb0\n __f2fs_write_data_pages+0x3ac/0x400\n do_writepages+0xe8/0x290\n __writeback_single_inode+0x5c/0x360\n writeback_sb_inodes+0x22f/0x570\n wb_writeback+0xb0/0x410\n wb_do_writeback+0x47/0x2f0\n wb_workfn+0x5a/0x1c0\n process_one_work+0x223/0x5b0\n worker_thread+0x1d5/0x3c0\n kthread+0xfd/0x230\n ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\nThe root cause is: once generic/475 starts toload error table to dm\ndevice, f2fs_prepare_compress_overwrite() will loop reading compressed\ncluster pages due to IO error, meanwhile it has held .writepages lock,\nit can block all other writeback tasks.\n\nLet\u0026apos;s fix this issue w/ below changes:\n- add f2fs_handle_page_eio() in prepare_compress_overwrite() to\ndetect IO error.\n- detect cp_error earler in f2fs_read_multi_pages().(CVE-2025-22127)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI: vmd: Make vmd_dev::cfg_lock a raw_spinlock_t type\n\nThe access to the PCI config space via pci_ops::read and pci_ops::write is\na low-level hardware access. The functions can be accessed with disabled\ninterrupts even on PREEMPT_RT. The pci_lock is a raw_spinlock_t for this\npurpose.\n\nA spinlock_t becomes a sleeping lock on PREEMPT_RT, so it cannot be\nacquired with disabled interrupts. The vmd_dev::cfg_lock is accessed in\nthe same context as the pci_lock.\n\nMake vmd_dev::cfg_lock a raw_spinlock_t type so it can be used with\ninterrupts disabled.\n\nThis was reported as:\n\n BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48\n Call Trace:\n rt_spin_lock+0x4e/0x130\n vmd_pci_read+0x8d/0x100 [vmd]\n pci_user_read_config_byte+0x6f/0xe0\n pci_read_config+0xfe/0x290\n sysfs_kf_bin_read+0x68/0x90\n\n[bigeasy: reword commit message]\nTested-off-by: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves \u0026lt;(CVE-2025-23161)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: ignore xattrs past end\n\nOnce inside \u0026apos;ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all\u0026apos; we should\nignore xattrs entries past the \u0026apos;end\u0026apos; entry.\n\nThis fixes the following KASAN reported issue:\n\n==================================================================\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0xb8c/0xe90\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff888012c120c4 by task repro/2065\n\nCPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2065 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2+ #11\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x1fd/0x300\n ? tcp_gro_dev_warn+0x260/0x260\n ? _printk+0xc0/0x100\n ? read_lock_is_recursive+0x10/0x10\n ? irq_work_queue+0x72/0xf0\n ? __virt_addr_valid+0x17b/0x4b0\n print_address_description+0x78/0x390\n print_report+0x107/0x1f0\n ? __virt_addr_valid+0x17b/0x4b0\n ? __virt_addr_valid+0x3ff/0x4b0\n ? __phys_addr+0xb5/0x160\n ? ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0xb8c/0xe90\n kasan_report+0xcc/0x100\n ? ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0xb8c/0xe90\n ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0xb8c/0xe90\n ? ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0xd30/0xd30\n ? __ext4_journal_ensure_credits+0x5f0/0x5f0\n ? __ext4_journal_ensure_credits+0x2b/0x5f0\n ? inode_update_timestamps+0x410/0x410\n ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0xb64/0xd30\n ? ext4_truncate+0xb70/0xdc0\n ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x1d20/0x1d20\n ? __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x670/0x670\n ? ext4_journal_check_start+0x16f/0x240\n ? ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink+0x2f2/0x3a0\n ext4_evict_inode+0xc8c/0xff0\n ? ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink+0x3a0/0x3a0\n ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x53/0x8a0\n ? ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink+0x3a0/0x3a0\n evict+0x4ac/0x950\n ? proc_nr_inodes+0x310/0x310\n ? trace_ext4_drop_inode+0xa2/0x220\n ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1a/0x30\n ? iput+0x4cb/0x7e0\n do_unlinkat+0x495/0x7c0\n ? try_break_deleg+0x120/0x120\n ? 0xffffffff81000000\n ? __check_object_size+0x15a/0x210\n ? strncpy_from_user+0x13e/0x250\n ? getname_flags+0x1dc/0x530\n __x64_sys_unlinkat+0xc8/0xf0\n do_syscall_64+0x65/0x110\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0x6f\nRIP: 0033:0x434ffd\nCode: 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 8\nRSP: 002b:00007ffc50fa7b28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000107\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc50fa7e18 RCX: 0000000000434ffd\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000240 RDI: 0000000000000005\nRBP: 00007ffc50fa7be0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001\nR13: 00007ffc50fa7e08 R14: 00000000004bbf30 R15: 0000000000000001\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\nThe buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888012c12000\n which belongs to the cache filp of size 360\nThe buggy address is located 196 bytes inside of\n freed 360-byte region [ffff888012c12000, ffff888012c12168)\n\nThe buggy address belongs to the physical page:\npage: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x12c12\nhead: order:1 mapcount:0 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0 pincount:0\nflags: 0x40(head|node=0|zone=0)\npage_type: f5(slab)\nraw: 0000000000000040 ffff888000ad7640 ffffea0000497a00 dead000000000004\nraw: 0000000000000000 0000000000100010 00000001f5000000 0000000000000000\nhead: 0000000000000040 ffff888000ad7640 ffffea0000497a00 dead000000000004\nhead: 0000000000000000 0000000000100010 00000001f5000000 0000000000000000\nhead: 0000000000000001 ffffea00004b0481 ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000000\nhead: 0000000000000002 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000\npage dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\n\nMemory state around the buggy address:\n ffff888012c11f80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00\n ffff888012c12000: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb\n\u0026gt; ffff888012c12080: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb\n ^\n ffff888012c12100: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc\n ffff888012c12180: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc\n---truncated---(CVE-2025-37738)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nperf: Fix hang while freeing sigtrap event\n\nPerf can hang while freeing a sigtrap event if a related deferred\nsignal hadn\u0026apos;t managed to be sent before the file got closed:\n\nperf_event_overflow()\n task_work_add(perf_pending_task)\n\nfput()\n task_work_add(____fput())\n\ntask_work_run()\n ____fput()\n perf_release()\n perf_event_release_kernel()\n _free_event()\n perf_pending_task_sync()\n task_work_cancel() -\u0026gt; FAILED\n rcuwait_wait_event()\n\nOnce task_work_run() is running, the list of pending callbacks is\nremoved from the task_struct and from this point on task_work_cancel()\ncan\u0026apos;t remove any pending and not yet started work items, hence the\ntask_work_cancel() failure and the hang on rcuwait_wait_event().\n\nTask work could be changed to remove one work at a time, so a work\nrunning on the current task can always cancel a pending one, however\nthe wait / wake design is still subject to inverted dependencies when\nremote targets are involved, as pictured by Oleg:\n\nT1 T2\n\nfd = perf_event_open(pid =\u0026gt; T2-\u0026gt;pid); fd = perf_event_open(pid =\u0026gt; T1-\u0026gt;pid);\nclose(fd) close(fd)\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt; \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n perf_event_overflow() perf_event_overflow()\n task_work_add(perf_pending_task) task_work_add(perf_pending_task)\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt; \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n fput() fput()\n task_work_add(____fput()) task_work_add(____fput())\n\n task_work_run() task_work_run()\n ____fput() ____fput()\n perf_release() perf_release()\n perf_event_release_kernel() perf_event_release_kernel()\n _free_event() _free_event()\n perf_pending_task_sync() perf_pending_task_sync()\n rcuwait_wait_event() rcuwait_wait_event()\n\nTherefore the only option left is to acquire the event reference count\nupon queueing the perf task work and release it from the task work, just\nlike it was done before 3a5465418f5f (\u0026quot;perf: Fix event leak upon exec and file release\u0026quot;)\nbut without the leaks it fixed.\n\nSome adjustments are necessary to make it work:\n\n* A child event might dereference its parent upon freeing. Care must be\n taken to release the parent last.\n\n* Some places assuming the event doesn\u0026apos;t have any reference held and\n therefore can be freed right away must instead put the reference and\n let the reference counting to its job.(CVE-2025-37747)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI: Fix reference leak in pci_register_host_bridge()\n\nIf device_register() fails, call put_device() to give up the reference to\navoid a memory leak, per the comment at device_register().\n\nFound by code review.\n\n[bhelgaas: squash Dan Carpenter\u0026apos;s double free fix from\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/r/(CVE-2025-37836)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Fix slab-use-after-free in hdcp\n\nThe HDCP code in amdgpu_dm_hdcp.c copies pointers to amdgpu_dm_connector\nobjects without incrementing the kref reference counts. When using a\nUSB-C dock, and the dock is unplugged, the corresponding\namdgpu_dm_connector objects are freed, creating dangling pointers in the\nHDCP code. When the dock is plugged back, the dangling pointers are\ndereferenced, resulting in a slab-use-after-free:\n\n[ 66.775837] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in event_property_validate+0x42f/0x6c0 [amdgpu]\n[ 66.776171] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888127804120 by task kworker/0:1/10\n\n[ 66.776179] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 10 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc7-00180-g54505f727a38-dirty #233\n[ 66.776183] Hardware name: HP HP Pavilion Aero Laptop 13-be0xxx/8916, BIOS F.17 12/18/2024\n[ 66.776186] Workqueue: events event_property_validate [amdgpu]\n[ 66.776494] Call Trace:\n[ 66.776496] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 66.776497] dump_stack_lvl+0x70/0xa0\n[ 66.776504] print_report+0x175/0x555\n[ 66.776507] ? __virt_addr_valid+0x243/0x450\n[ 66.776510] ? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x66/0x1c0\n[ 66.776515] kasan_report+0xeb/0x1c0\n[ 66.776518] ? event_property_validate+0x42f/0x6c0 [amdgpu]\n[ 66.776819] ? event_property_validate+0x42f/0x6c0 [amdgpu]\n[ 66.777121] __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x14/0x20\n[ 66.777124] event_property_validate+0x42f/0x6c0 [amdgpu]\n[ 66.777342] ? __lock_acquire+0x6b40/0x6b40\n[ 66.777347] ? enable_assr+0x250/0x250 [amdgpu]\n[ 66.777571] process_one_work+0x86b/0x1510\n[ 66.777575] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0xcf0/0xcf0\n[ 66.777578] ? assign_work+0x16b/0x280\n[ 66.777580] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa3/0x130\n[ 66.777583] worker_thread+0x5c0/0xfa0\n[ 66.777587] ? process_one_work+0x1510/0x1510\n[ 66.777588] kthread+0x3a2/0x840\n[ 66.777591] ? kthread_is_per_cpu+0xd0/0xd0\n[ 66.777594] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x4f/0x60\n[ 66.777597] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x60\n[ 66.777599] ? calculate_sigpending+0x77/0xa0\n[ 66.777602] ? kthread_is_per_cpu+0xd0/0xd0\n[ 66.777605] ret_from_fork+0x40/0x90\n[ 66.777607] ? kthread_is_per_cpu+0xd0/0xd0\n[ 66.777609] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20\n[ 66.777614] \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\n[ 66.777643] Allocated by task 10:\n[ 66.777646] kasan_save_stack+0x39/0x60\n[ 66.777649] kasan_save_track+0x14/0x40\n[ 66.777652] kasan_save_alloc_info+0x37/0x50\n[ 66.777655] __kasan_kmalloc+0xbb/0xc0\n[ 66.777658] __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x1c8/0x4b0\n[ 66.777661] dm_dp_add_mst_connector+0xdd/0x5c0 [amdgpu]\n[ 66.777880] drm_dp_mst_port_add_connector+0x47e/0x770 [drm_display_helper]\n[ 66.777892] drm_dp_send_link_address+0x1554/0x2bf0 [drm_display_helper]\n[ 66.777901] drm_dp_check_and_send_link_address+0x187/0x1f0 [drm_display_helper]\n[ 66.777909] drm_dp_mst_link_probe_work+0x2b8/0x410 [drm_display_helper]\n[ 66.777917] process_one_work+0x86b/0x1510\n[ 66.777919] worker_thread+0x5c0/0xfa0\n[ 66.777922] kthread+0x3a2/0x840\n[ 66.777925] ret_from_fork+0x40/0x90\n[ 66.777927] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20\n\n[ 66.777932] Freed by task 1713:\n[ 66.777935] kasan_save_stack+0x39/0x60\n[ 66.777938] kasan_save_track+0x14/0x40\n[ 66.777940] kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60\n[ 66.777944] __kasan_slab_free+0x52/0x70\n[ 66.777946] kfree+0x13f/0x4b0\n[ 66.777949] dm_dp_mst_connector_destroy+0xfa/0x150 [amdgpu]\n[ 66.778179] drm_connector_free+0x7d/0xb0\n[ 66.778184] drm_mode_object_put.part.0+0xee/0x160\n[ 66.778188] drm_mode_object_put+0x37/0x50\n[ 66.778191] drm_atomic_state_default_clear+0x220/0xd60\n[ 66.778194] __drm_atomic_state_free+0x16e/0x2a0\n[ 66.778197] drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x15ed/0x2ba0\n[ 66.778200] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x17a/0x310\n[ 66.778203] drm_ioctl+0x584/0xd10\n[ 66.778206] amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0xd2/0x1c0 [amdgpu]\n[ 66.778375] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x139/0x1a0\n[ 66.778378] x64_sys_call+0xee7/0xfb0\n[ 66.778381] \n---truncated---(CVE-2025-37903)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nksmbd: Fix UAF in __close_file_table_ids\n\nA use-after-free is possible if one thread destroys the file\nvia __ksmbd_close_fd while another thread holds a reference to\nit. The existing checks on fp-\u0026gt;refcount are not sufficient to\nprevent this.\n\nThe fix takes ft-\u0026gt;lock around the section which removes the\nfile from the file table. This prevents two threads acquiring the\nsame file pointer via __close_file_table_ids, as well as the other\nfunctions which retrieve a file from the IDR and which already use\nthis same lock.(CVE-2025-37952)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfix a couple of races in MNT_TREE_BENEATH handling by do_move_mount()\n\nNormally do_lock_mount(path, _) is locking a mountpoint pinned by\n*path and at the time when matching unlock_mount() unlocks that\nlocation it is still pinned by the same thing.\n\nUnfortunately, for \u0026apos;beneath\u0026apos; case it\u0026apos;s no longer that simple -\nthe object being locked is not the one *path points to. It\u0026apos;s the\nmountpoint of path-\u0026gt;mnt. The thing is, without sufficient locking\n-\u0026gt;mnt_parent may change under us and none of the locks are held\nat that point. The rules are\n\t* mount_lock stabilizes m-\u0026gt;mnt_parent for any mount m.\n\t* namespace_sem stabilizes m-\u0026gt;mnt_parent, provided that\nm is mounted.\n\t* if either of the above holds and refcount of m is positive,\nwe are guaranteed the same for refcount of m-\u0026gt;mnt_parent.\n\nnamespace_sem nests inside inode_lock(), so do_lock_mount() has\nto take inode_lock() before grabbing namespace_sem. It does\nrecheck that path-\u0026gt;mnt is still mounted in the same place after\ngetting namespace_sem, and it does take care to pin the dentry.\nIt is needed, since otherwise we might end up with racing mount --move\n(or umount) happening while we were getting locks; in that case\ndentry would no longer be a mountpoint and could\u0026apos;ve been evicted\non memory pressure along with its inode - not something you want\nwhen grabbing lock on that inode.\n\nHowever, pinning a dentry is not enough - the matching mount is\nalso pinned only by the fact that path-\u0026gt;mnt is mounted on top it\nand at that point we are not holding any locks whatsoever, so\nthe same kind of races could end up with all references to\nthat mount gone just as we are about to enter inode_lock().\nIf that happens, we are left with filesystem being shut down while\nwe are holding a dentry reference on it; results are not pretty.\n\nWhat we need to do is grab both dentry and mount at the same time;\nthat makes inode_lock() safe *and* avoids the problem with fs getting\nshut down under us. After taking namespace_sem we verify that\npath-\u0026gt;mnt is still mounted (which stabilizes its -\u0026gt;mnt_parent) and\ncheck that it\u0026apos;s still mounted at the same place. From that point\non to the matching namespace_unlock() we are guaranteed that\nmount/dentry pair we\u0026apos;d grabbed are also pinned by being the mountpoint\nof path-\u0026gt;mnt, so we can quietly drop both the dentry reference (as\nthe current code does) and mnt one - it\u0026apos;s OK to do under namespace_sem,\nsince we are not dropping the final refs.\n\nThat solves the problem on do_lock_mount() side; unlock_mount()\nalso has one, since dentry is guaranteed to stay pinned only until\nthe namespace_unlock(). That\u0026apos;s easy to fix - just have inode_unlock()\ndone earlier, while it\u0026apos;s still pinned by mp-\u0026gt;m_dentry.(CVE-2025-37988)",
"id": "OESA-2025-1595",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:08:41Z",
"published": "2025-06-06T11:08:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-1595"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50140"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53175"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53188"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53200"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56568"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21676"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21919"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22028"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22104"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22109"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22127"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-23161"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37738"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37747"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37836"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37903"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37952"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37988"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2024-50140",
"CVE-2024-53175",
"CVE-2024-53188",
"CVE-2024-53200",
"CVE-2024-56568",
"CVE-2025-21676",
"CVE-2025-21919",
"CVE-2025-22028",
"CVE-2025-22104",
"CVE-2025-22109",
"CVE-2025-22127",
"CVE-2025-23161",
"CVE-2025-37738",
"CVE-2025-37747",
"CVE-2025-37836",
"CVE-2025-37903",
"CVE-2025-37952",
"CVE-2025-37988"
]
}
RHSA-2025:11850
Vulnerability from csaf_redhat - Published: 2025-07-28 08:16 - Updated: 2026-08-04 19:42In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/fair: Fix potential memory corruption in child_cfs_rq_on_list child_cfs_rq_on_list attempts to convert a 'prev' pointer to a cfs_rq. This 'prev' pointer can originate from struct rq's leaf_cfs_rq_list, making the conversion invalid and potentially leading to memory corruption. Depending on the relative positions of leaf_cfs_rq_list and the task group (tg) pointer within the struct, this can cause a memory fault or access garbage data. The issue arises in list_add_leaf_cfs_rq, where both cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list and rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list are added to the same leaf list. Also, rq->tmp_alone_branch can be set to rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list. This adds a check `if (prev == &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list)` after the main conditional in child_cfs_rq_on_list. This ensures that the container_of operation will convert a correct cfs_rq struct. This check is sufficient because only cfs_rqs on the same CPU are added to the list, so verifying the 'prev' pointer against the current rq's list head is enough. Fixes a potential memory corruption issue that due to current struct layout might not be manifesting as a crash but could lead to unpredictable behavior when the layout changes.
RHSA-2025:11851
Vulnerability from csaf_redhat - Published: 2025-07-28 08:09 - Updated: 2026-08-04 19:42In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/fair: Fix potential memory corruption in child_cfs_rq_on_list child_cfs_rq_on_list attempts to convert a 'prev' pointer to a cfs_rq. This 'prev' pointer can originate from struct rq's leaf_cfs_rq_list, making the conversion invalid and potentially leading to memory corruption. Depending on the relative positions of leaf_cfs_rq_list and the task group (tg) pointer within the struct, this can cause a memory fault or access garbage data. The issue arises in list_add_leaf_cfs_rq, where both cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list and rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list are added to the same leaf list. Also, rq->tmp_alone_branch can be set to rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list. This adds a check `if (prev == &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list)` after the main conditional in child_cfs_rq_on_list. This ensures that the container_of operation will convert a correct cfs_rq struct. This check is sufficient because only cfs_rqs on the same CPU are added to the list, so verifying the 'prev' pointer against the current rq's list head is enough. Fixes a potential memory corruption issue that due to current struct layout might not be manifesting as a crash but could lead to unpredictable behavior when the layout changes.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.