Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2024-50268 (GCVE-0-2024-50268)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-11-19 01:30 – Updated: 2026-08-05 11:42- CWE-125 - Out-of-bounds Read
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e , < d76923164705821aa1b01b8d9d1741f20c654ab4
(git)
Affected: 170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e , < 8f47984b35f3be0cfc652c2ca358d5768ea3456b (git) Affected: 170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e , < 604314ecd682913925980dc955caea2d036eab5f (git) Affected: 170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e , < 69e19774f15e12dda6c6c58001d059e30895009b (git) Affected: 170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e , < 3a2ba841659a0f15102585120dea75d8d5209616 (git) Affected: 170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e , < 7dd08a0b4193087976db6b3ee7807de7e8316f96 (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
5.6
Unaffected: 0 , < 5.6 (semver) Unaffected: 5.10.230 , ≤ 5.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.15.172 , ≤ 5.15.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.1.117 , ≤ 6.1.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.61 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.11.8 , ≤ 6.11.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.12 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-50268",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-01T20:15:13.462825Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-125",
"description": "CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-01T20:17:23.672Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T22:27:48.152Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00002.html"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "d76923164705821aa1b01b8d9d1741f20c654ab4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8f47984b35f3be0cfc652c2ca358d5768ea3456b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "604314ecd682913925980dc955caea2d036eab5f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "69e19774f15e12dda6c6c58001d059e30895009b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3a2ba841659a0f15102585120dea75d8d5209616",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7dd08a0b4193087976db6b3ee7807de7e8316f96",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.6"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.6",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.230",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.172",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.117",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.61",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.11.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.11.8",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.230",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.172",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.117",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.61",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.11.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.6",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nusb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd()\n\nThe \"*cmd\" variable can be controlled by the user via debugfs. That means\n\"new_cam\" can be as high as 255 while the size of the uc-\u003eupdated[] array\nis UCSI_MAX_ALTMODES (30).\n\nThe call tree is:\nucsi_cmd() // val comes from simple_attr_write_xsigned()\n-\u003e ucsi_send_command()\n -\u003e ucsi_send_command_common()\n -\u003e ucsi_run_command() // calls ucsi-\u003eops-\u003esync_control()\n -\u003e ucsi_ccg_sync_control()"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AV:L - The attacker-controlled `*cmd` value originates from a local write to the UCSI debugfs `command` file on the local system, not from any network or remote peer input. No physical access is required to issue the malformed command itself.\nAC:L - The index is taken verbatim from bits 24-31 of the value the attacker writes, so the out-of-bounds access is deterministic and repeatable with no race or memory-layout guessing. The `has_multiple_dp` precondition is under the attacker\u0027s own control since a local attacker can attach a Type-C partner advertising multiple DP alternate modes.\nPR:L - Reaching the code requires write access to the UCSI debugfs interface, which is an authenticated local account with access to the debugfs mount rather than any remote or unauthenticated position. Consistent with prior kernel.org scoring of debugfs-reachable overflows, this is treated as low privilege rather than high.\nUI:N - The attacker triggers the flaw entirely on their own by writing the crafted UCSI command; no separate victim needs to open a file, mount a filesystem, or take any other action. Establishing the multi-DP connector state is an action the attacker performs themselves, not a victim.\nS:U - The out-of-bounds access corrupts kernel heap memory within the same kernel security authority. No hypervisor, IOMMU, or sandbox boundary is crossed.\nC:H - `new_port-\u003elinked_idx` and `new_port-\u003esvid` are read from an attacker-selected offset ranging up to roughly 2 KB past the end of the `updated[]` array and past the containing `struct ucsi_ccg` allocation, so this is a wide-ranging heap out-of-bounds read rather than a tightly bounded one. The disclosed bytes steer subsequent control flow and the command value programmed into the PD controller, and such heap OOB reads are leverageable for broader kernel memory disclosure.\nI:H - When the out-of-bounds `linked_idx` reads as `0xff` and the ENTER bit is set, `new_port-\u003eactive_idx = cam` performs a one-byte out-of-bounds heap write at the attacker-chosen offset, giving a controlled-location heap corruption primitive. Out-of-bounds writes into adjacent slab objects are exploitable for control-flow hijacking, and the corrupted value also alters the command sent to the Type-C PD controller.\nA:H - Reading and writing thousands of bytes beyond a `devm`-allocated object corrupts neighbouring slab objects or touches unmapped memory, producing slab corruption, KASAN reports, and kernel oops/panic. The attacker can repeat the write with different offsets until the system crashes."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T11:42:56.179Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d76923164705821aa1b01b8d9d1741f20c654ab4"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f47984b35f3be0cfc652c2ca358d5768ea3456b"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/604314ecd682913925980dc955caea2d036eab5f"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69e19774f15e12dda6c6c58001d059e30895009b"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a2ba841659a0f15102585120dea75d8d5209616"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7dd08a0b4193087976db6b3ee7807de7e8316f96"
}
],
"title": "usb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd()",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-50268",
"datePublished": "2024-11-19T01:30:05.437Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-10-21T19:36:19.982Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T11:42:56.179Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2024-50268",
"date": "2026-10-11",
"epss": "0.00263",
"percentile": "0.167"
},
"microsoft_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-02-19T01:10:24.000Z",
"cve": "CVE-2024-50268",
"id": "msrc_CVE-2024-50268",
"initial_release_date": "2024-11-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"product_status:fixed": "3",
"product_status:known_affected": "3",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "usb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd()",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2024/msrc_cve-2024-50268.json",
"version": "3"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "d76923164705821aa1b01b8d9d1741f20c654ab4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8f47984b35f3be0cfc652c2ca358d5768ea3456b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "604314ecd682913925980dc955caea2d036eab5f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "69e19774f15e12dda6c6c58001d059e30895009b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3a2ba841659a0f15102585120dea75d8d5209616",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7dd08a0b4193087976db6b3ee7807de7e8316f96",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.6"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.6",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.230",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.172",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.117",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.61",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.11.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.11.8",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "CA0181D1-C3B5-45D3-8100-3EAD5D3086C8",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.230",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "88812664-4296-42AC-AE0F-ED71086C1BB1",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.172",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0DD7F755-2F6B-4707-8973-78496AD5AA8E",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.117",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "630ED7EB-C97E-4435-B884-1E309E40D6F3",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.61",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0BD000F7-3DAD-4DD3-8906-98EA1EC67E95",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.11.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7F361E1D-580F-4A2D-A509-7615F73167A1",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "925478D0-3E3D-4E6F-ACD5-09F28D5DF82C",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "3C95E234-D335-4B6C-96BF-E2CEBD8654ED",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E0F717D8-3014-4F84-8086-0124B2111379",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "24DBE6C7-2AAE-4818-AED2-E131F153D2FA",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "24B88717-53F5-42AA-9B72-14C707639E3F",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nusb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd()\n\nThe \"*cmd\" variable can be controlled by the user via debugfs. That means\n\"new_cam\" can be as high as 255 while the size of the uc-\u003eupdated[] array\nis UCSI_MAX_ALTMODES (30).\n\nThe call tree is:\nucsi_cmd() // val comes from simple_attr_write_xsigned()\n-\u003e ucsi_send_command()\n -\u003e ucsi_send_command_common()\n -\u003e ucsi_run_command() // calls ucsi-\u003eops-\u003esync_control()\n -\u003e ucsi_ccg_sync_control()"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: usb: typec: se corrige un posible error fuera de los l\u00edmites en ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd() La variable \"*cmd\" puede ser controlada por el usuario a trav\u00e9s de debugfs. Esto significa que \"new_cam\" puede tener un valor de hasta 255, mientras que el tama\u00f1o de la matriz uc-\u0026gt;updated[] es UCSI_MAX_ALTMODES (30). El \u00e1rbol de llamadas es: ucsi_cmd() // val proviene de simple_attr_write_xsigned() -\u0026gt; ucsi_send_command() -\u0026gt; ucsi_send_command_common() -\u0026gt; ucsi_run_command() // llama a ucsi-\u0026gt;ops-\u0026gt;sync_control() -\u0026gt; ucsi_ccg_sync_control()"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-50268",
"lastModified": "2026-08-04T11:21:38.907",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-50268",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-01T20:15:13.462825Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-11-19T02:16:28.787",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a2ba841659a0f15102585120dea75d8d5209616"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/604314ecd682913925980dc955caea2d036eab5f"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69e19774f15e12dda6c6c58001d059e30895009b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7dd08a0b4193087976db6b3ee7807de7e8316f96"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f47984b35f3be0cfc652c2ca358d5768ea3456b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d76923164705821aa1b01b8d9d1741f20c654ab4"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00002.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-125"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-125"
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-09-28T05:59:20+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2024-50268",
"id": "CVE-2024-50268",
"initial_release_date": "2024-11-19T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_affected": "108",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "90",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: usb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd()",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2024/cve-2024-50268.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T22:27:48.152Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00002.html"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-50268",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-01T20:15:13.462825Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-125",
"description": "CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-01T15:25:49.917Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "d76923164705821aa1b01b8d9d1741f20c654ab4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8f47984b35f3be0cfc652c2ca358d5768ea3456b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "604314ecd682913925980dc955caea2d036eab5f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "69e19774f15e12dda6c6c58001d059e30895009b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3a2ba841659a0f15102585120dea75d8d5209616",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7dd08a0b4193087976db6b3ee7807de7e8316f96",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.6"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.6",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.230",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.172",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.117",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.61",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.11.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.11.8",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.230",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.172",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.117",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.61",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.11.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.6",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nusb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd()\n\nThe \"*cmd\" variable can be controlled by the user via debugfs. That means\n\"new_cam\" can be as high as 255 while the size of the uc-\u003eupdated[] array\nis UCSI_MAX_ALTMODES (30).\n\nThe call tree is:\nucsi_cmd() // val comes from simple_attr_write_xsigned()\n-\u003e ucsi_send_command()\n -\u003e ucsi_send_command_common()\n -\u003e ucsi_run_command() // calls ucsi-\u003eops-\u003esync_control()\n -\u003e ucsi_ccg_sync_control()"
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-05-04T09:50:21.342Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d76923164705821aa1b01b8d9d1741f20c654ab4"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f47984b35f3be0cfc652c2ca358d5768ea3456b"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/604314ecd682913925980dc955caea2d036eab5f"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69e19774f15e12dda6c6c58001d059e30895009b"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a2ba841659a0f15102585120dea75d8d5209616"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7dd08a0b4193087976db6b3ee7807de7e8316f96"
}
],
"title": "usb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd()",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-50268",
"datePublished": "2024-11-19T01:30:05.437Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-10-21T19:36:19.982Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T22:27:48.152Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0349
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2025-04-25 - Updated: 2025-04-25
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, une élévation de privilèges et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.10",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-55881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-55881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-55916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-55916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56577",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56577"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56620",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56620"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47711",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47711"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2312"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2025-04-25T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2025-04-25T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0349",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-04-25T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-04-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7459-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7459-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7451-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7451-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7449-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7449-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7450-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7450-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7461-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7461-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7453-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7453-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7462-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7462-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7463-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7463-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7445-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7445-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7448-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7448-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7461-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7461-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7455-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7455-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-22",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7402-5",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7402-5"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7455-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7455-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7460-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7460-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7462-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7462-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7452-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7452-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7458-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7458-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7455-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7455-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-23",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7449-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7449-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2025-05-02 - Updated: 2025-05-02
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-55881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-55881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-55916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-55916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56577",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56577"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56620",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56620"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47711",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47711"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2312"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2025-05-02T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2025-05-02T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0366",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-05-02T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-04-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7455-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7455-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7459-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7459-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7468-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7468-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-04-29",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-7455-5",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7455-5"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2025-08-12 - Updated: 2025-08-12
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 versions antérieures à V6.0 SP1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V17, v18 et V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Control Function Library (CFL) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIPROTEC 5 versions antérieures à 10.0 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC MTP Integrator toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V17 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified Line Coordination toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC TeleControl toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.19 versions antérieures à V3.19 P020 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC flexible ES toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-Fail-safe Configuration Tool (S7-FCT) versions antérieures à 4.0.1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie Core Package (6DL5424-0AX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC MTP CREATOR V2.x et V3.x toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.18 versions antérieures à V3.18 P032 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V19 versions antérieures à 5.2.1.1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC D7-SYS toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC BATCH V10.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ODK 1500S toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2020 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V2 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud Connector toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified Sequence toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-40759. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Advanced toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Logon V2.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PDM Maintenance Station V5.0 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Safety Matrix toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Management Console toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC BATCH V9.1 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Function Library (PFL) V4.0 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V3 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V20 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC NET PC Software toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Route Control V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.20 versions antérieures à V3.20 P008 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions antérieures à 3.3 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | Siprotec 4 7SA6, 7SD5 et 7SD610 versions antérieures à 4.78 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Automation Tool toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V18 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PDM V9.2 et V9.3 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Professional toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Visualization Architect (SiVArc) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie Workflow Skills toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V19 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Management Agent toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V7.5 et V8.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V5.7 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Automation Tool SDK Windows toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V20 versions antérieures à V20 Update 1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V17 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Energy Suite toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Process Historian 2024 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V19 versions antérieures à V19 Update 4 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Test Suite V17, v18, v19 et v20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PCT toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Target toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V18 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Logon V1.6 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 et V18 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced versions antérieures à V7.0 Update 1 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V5.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC STEP 7 V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | TIA Portal Cloud V20 toutes versions pour les vulnérabilités CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | Siprotec 4 toutes versions et tous modèles exceptés 7SA6, 7SD5, 7SD610 pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-52504. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC eaSie PCS 7 Skill Package (6DL5424-0BX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 versions antérieures à 3.2 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17, V18 et V19 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V18, V19 et V20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 Advanced Process Faceplates V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.4 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Information Server toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-47809 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.3 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC ProSave V20 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS 7 Logic Matrix V9.1 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | WinCC Panel Image Setup toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 et V5.0 toutes versions. L'éditeur indique que le produit ne bénéficiera pas de correctif de sécurité pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2024-54678. | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC Route Control V10.0 toutes versions pour la vulnérabilité CVE-2025-30033 | ||
| Siemens | N/A | SIMATIC WinCC V8.1 versions antérieures à V8.1 Update 3 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V6.0 SP1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V17, v18 et V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Control Function Library (CFL) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIPROTEC 5 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.0",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC MTP Integrator toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V17 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified Line Coordination toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC TeleControl toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.19 P020",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC flexible ES toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-Fail-safe Configuration Tool (S7-FCT) versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.0.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V6.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie Core Package (6DL5424-0AX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC MTP CREATOR V2.x et V3.x toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.18 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.18 P032",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 5.2.1.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC D7-SYS toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC BATCH V10.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ODK 1500S toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2020 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V2 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud Connector toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified Sequence toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-40759.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Advanced toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Logon V2.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PDM Maintenance Station V5.0 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2025-30033 et CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Safety Matrix toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Management Console toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC BATCH V9.1 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Function Library (PFL) V4.0 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller V3 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V20 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC NET PC Software toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Route Control V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC OA V3.20 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V3.20 P008",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "Siprotec 4 7SA6, 7SD5 et 7SD610 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.78",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Automation Tool toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V18 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PDM V9.2 et V9.3 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Runtime Professional toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Visualization Architect (SiVArc) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie Workflow Skills toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 CFC V19 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Management Agent toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V7.5 et V8.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V5.7 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Automation Tool SDK Windows toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2022 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V20 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V20 Update 1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V17 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Energy Suite toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Process Historian 2024 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V19 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V19 Update 4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Test Suite V17, v18, v19 et v20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PCT toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Target toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V18 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Logon V1.6 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 et V18 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM Advanced versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V7.0 Update 1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V5.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC STEP 7 V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "TIA Portal Cloud V20 toutes versions pour les vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s CVE-2024-54678 et CVE-2025-40759",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "Siprotec 4 toutes versions et tous mod\u00e8les except\u00e9s 7SA6, 7SD5, 7SD610 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-52504. ",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC eaSie PCS 7 Skill Package (6DL5424-0BX00-0AV8) toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7-PLCSIM V17, V18 et V19 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V18, V19 et V20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 Advanced Process Faceplates V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.4 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Information Server toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-47809",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC S7 F Systems V6.3 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC ProSave V20 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS 7 Logic Matrix V9.1 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "WinCC Panel Image Setup toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC PCS neo V4.1 et V5.0 toutes versions. L\u0027\u00e9diteur indique que le produit ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiera pas de correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2024-54678.",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC Route Control V10.0 toutes versions pour la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 CVE-2025-30033",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
},
{
"description": "SIMATIC WinCC V8.1 versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 V8.1 Update 3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "Siemens",
"scada": true
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-35827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-51780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52655",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52655"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52504"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2025-08-12T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2025-08-12T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-08-12T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits Siemens. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits Siemens",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-707630",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-707630.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-331739",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-331739.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-693808",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-693808.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-613116",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-613116.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-493396",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-493396.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-11",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens ssa-400089",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-400089.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-493787",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-493787.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-894058",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-894058.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-355557",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-355557.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-529291",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-529291.html"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-08-12",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Siemens SSA-282044",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-282044.html"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2024-50268
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-11-19 02:16 - Updated: 2026-08-04 11:217.1 (High) - CVSS:3.1/
7.1 (High) - CVSS:3.1/
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a2ba841659a0f15102585120dea75d8d5209616 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/604314ecd682913925980dc955caea2d036eab5f | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69e19774f15e12dda6c6c58001d059e30895009b | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7dd08a0b4193087976db6b3ee7807de7e8316f96 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f47984b35f3be0cfc652c2ca358d5768ea3456b | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d76923164705821aa1b01b8d9d1741f20c654ab4 | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html | ||
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00002.html |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "d76923164705821aa1b01b8d9d1741f20c654ab4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "8f47984b35f3be0cfc652c2ca358d5768ea3456b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "604314ecd682913925980dc955caea2d036eab5f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "69e19774f15e12dda6c6c58001d059e30895009b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "3a2ba841659a0f15102585120dea75d8d5209616",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "7dd08a0b4193087976db6b3ee7807de7e8316f96",
"status": "affected",
"version": "170a6726d0e266f2c8f306e3d61715c32f4ee41e",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.6"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.6",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.230",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.172",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.117",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.61",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.11.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.11.8",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "CA0181D1-C3B5-45D3-8100-3EAD5D3086C8",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.230",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "88812664-4296-42AC-AE0F-ED71086C1BB1",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.172",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0DD7F755-2F6B-4707-8973-78496AD5AA8E",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.117",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "630ED7EB-C97E-4435-B884-1E309E40D6F3",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.61",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0BD000F7-3DAD-4DD3-8906-98EA1EC67E95",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.11.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7F361E1D-580F-4A2D-A509-7615F73167A1",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "925478D0-3E3D-4E6F-ACD5-09F28D5DF82C",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "3C95E234-D335-4B6C-96BF-E2CEBD8654ED",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E0F717D8-3014-4F84-8086-0124B2111379",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "24DBE6C7-2AAE-4818-AED2-E131F153D2FA",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.12:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "24B88717-53F5-42AA-9B72-14C707639E3F",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nusb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd()\n\nThe \"*cmd\" variable can be controlled by the user via debugfs. That means\n\"new_cam\" can be as high as 255 while the size of the uc-\u003eupdated[] array\nis UCSI_MAX_ALTMODES (30).\n\nThe call tree is:\nucsi_cmd() // val comes from simple_attr_write_xsigned()\n-\u003e ucsi_send_command()\n -\u003e ucsi_send_command_common()\n -\u003e ucsi_run_command() // calls ucsi-\u003eops-\u003esync_control()\n -\u003e ucsi_ccg_sync_control()"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: usb: typec: se corrige un posible error fuera de los l\u00edmites en ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd() La variable \"*cmd\" puede ser controlada por el usuario a trav\u00e9s de debugfs. Esto significa que \"new_cam\" puede tener un valor de hasta 255, mientras que el tama\u00f1o de la matriz uc-\u0026gt;updated[] es UCSI_MAX_ALTMODES (30). El \u00e1rbol de llamadas es: ucsi_cmd() // val proviene de simple_attr_write_xsigned() -\u0026gt; ucsi_send_command() -\u0026gt; ucsi_send_command_common() -\u0026gt; ucsi_run_command() // llama a ucsi-\u0026gt;ops-\u0026gt;sync_control() -\u0026gt; ucsi_ccg_sync_control()"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-50268",
"lastModified": "2026-08-04T11:21:38.907",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-50268",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-01T20:15:13.462825Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-11-19T02:16:28.787",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a2ba841659a0f15102585120dea75d8d5209616"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/604314ecd682913925980dc955caea2d036eab5f"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69e19774f15e12dda6c6c58001d059e30895009b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7dd08a0b4193087976db6b3ee7807de7e8316f96"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f47984b35f3be0cfc652c2ca358d5768ea3456b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d76923164705821aa1b01b8d9d1741f20c654ab4"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00002.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-125"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-125"
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
GHSA-RCQH-96HR-HV69
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-19 03:31 – Updated: 2025-11-04 00:32In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd()
The "*cmd" variable can be controlled by the user via debugfs. That means "new_cam" can be as high as 255 while the size of the uc->updated[] array is UCSI_MAX_ALTMODES (30).
The call tree is: ucsi_cmd() // val comes from simple_attr_write_xsigned() -> ucsi_send_command() -> ucsi_send_command_common() -> ucsi_run_command() // calls ucsi->ops->sync_control() -> ucsi_ccg_sync_control()
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-50268"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-125"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-11-19T02:16:28Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nusb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd()\n\nThe \"*cmd\" variable can be controlled by the user via debugfs. That means\n\"new_cam\" can be as high as 255 while the size of the uc-\u003eupdated[] array\nis UCSI_MAX_ALTMODES (30).\n\nThe call tree is:\nucsi_cmd() // val comes from simple_attr_write_xsigned()\n-\u003e ucsi_send_command()\n -\u003e ucsi_send_command_common()\n -\u003e ucsi_run_command() // calls ucsi-\u003eops-\u003esync_control()\n -\u003e ucsi_ccg_sync_control()",
"id": "GHSA-rcqh-96hr-hv69",
"modified": "2025-11-04T00:32:03Z",
"published": "2024-11-19T03:31:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50268"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a2ba841659a0f15102585120dea75d8d5209616"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/604314ecd682913925980dc955caea2d036eab5f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69e19774f15e12dda6c6c58001d059e30895009b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7dd08a0b4193087976db6b3ee7807de7e8316f96"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f47984b35f3be0cfc652c2ca358d5768ea3456b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d76923164705821aa1b01b8d9d1741f20c654ab4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00002.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
ICSA-25-226-07
Vulnerability from csaf_cisa - Published: 2025-08-12 00:00 - Updated: 2026-02-25 07:00MSRC_CVE-2024-50268
Vulnerability from csaf_microsoft - Published: 2024-11-02 00:00 - Updated: 2026-02-19 01:10OESA-2024-2537 (CVE-2024-40927)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-12-13 11:08 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:08 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xhci: Handle TD clearing for multiple streams case When multiple streams are in use, multiple TDs might be in flight when an endpoint is stopped. We need to issue a Set TR Dequeue Pointer for each, to ensure everything is reset properly and the caches cleared. Change the logic so that any N>1 TDs found active for different streams are deferred until after the first one is processed, calling xhci_invalidate_cancelled_tds() again from xhci_handle_cmd_set_deq() to queue another command until we are done with all of them. Also change the error/"should never happen" paths to ensure we at least clear any affected TDs, even if we can't issue a command to clear the hardware cache, and complain loudly with an xhci_warn() if this ever happens. This problem case dates back to commit e9df17eb1408 ("USB: xhci: Correct assumptions about number of rings per endpoint.") early on in the XHCI driver's life, when stream support was first added. It was then identified but not fixed nor made into a warning in commit 674f8438c121 ("xhci: split handling halted endpoints into two steps"), which added a FIXME comment for the problem case (without materially changing the behavior as far as I can tell, though the new logic made the problem more obvious). Then later, in commit 94f339147fc3 ("xhci: Fix failure to give back some cached cancelled URBs."), it was acknowledged again. [Mathias: commit 94f339147fc3 ("xhci: Fix failure to give back some cached cancelled URBs.") was a targeted regression fix to the previously mentioned patch. Users reported issues with usb stuck after unmounting/disconnecting UAS devices. This rolled back the TD clearing of multiple streams to its original state.] Apparently the commit author was aware of the problem (yet still chose to submit it): It was still mentioned as a FIXME, an xhci_dbg() was added to log the problem condition, and the remaining issue was mentioned in the commit description. The choice of making the log type xhci_dbg() for what is, at this point, a completely unhandled and known broken condition is puzzling and unfortunate, as it guarantees that no actual users would see the log in production, thereby making it nigh undebuggable (indeed, even if you turn on DEBUG, the message doesn't really hint at there being a problem at all). It took me months of random xHC crashes to finally find a reliable repro and be able to do a deep dive debug session, which could all have been avoided had this unhandled, broken condition been actually reported with a warning, as it should have been as a bug intentionally left in unfixed (never mind that it shouldn't have been left in at all). > Another fix to solve clearing the caches of all stream rings with > cancelled TDs is needed, but not as urgent. 3 years after that statement and 14 years after the original bug was introduced, I think it's finally time to fix it. And maybe next time let's not leave bugs unfixed (that are actually worse than the original bug), and let's actually get people to review kernel commits please. Fixes xHC crashes and IOMMU faults with UAS devices when handling errors/faults. Easiest repro is to use hdparm to mark an early sector (e.g. 1024) on a disk as bad, then cat /dev/sdX > /dev/null in a loop. At least in the case of JMicron controllers, the read errors end up having to cancel two TDs (for two queued requests to different streams) and the one that didn't get cleared properly ends up faulting the xHC entirely when it tries to access DMA pages that have since been unmapped, referred to by the stale TDs. This normally happens quickly (after two or three loops). After this fix, I left the cat in a loop running overnight and experienced no xHC failures, with all read errors recovered properly. Repro'd and tested on an Apple M1 Mac Mini (dwc3 host). On systems without an IOMMU, this bug would instead silently corrupt freed memory, making this a ---truncated---(CVE-2024-40927)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drivers: media: dvb-frontends/rtl2830: fix an out-of-bounds write error Ensure index in rtl2830_pid_filter does not exceed 31 to prevent out-of-bounds access. dev->filters is a 32-bit value, so set_bit and clear_bit functions should only operate on indices from 0 to 31. If index is 32, it will attempt to access a non-existent 33rd bit, leading to out-of-bounds access. Change the boundary check from index > 32 to index >= 32 to resolve this issue.(CVE-2024-47697)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: mac80211: use two-phase skb reclamation in ieee80211_do_stop() Since '__dev_queue_xmit()' should be called with interrupts enabled, the following backtrace: ieee80211_do_stop() ... spin_lock_irqsave(&local->queue_stop_reason_lock, flags) ... ieee80211_free_txskb() ieee80211_report_used_skb() ieee80211_report_ack_skb() cfg80211_mgmt_tx_status_ext() nl80211_frame_tx_status() genlmsg_multicast_netns() genlmsg_multicast_netns_filtered() nlmsg_multicast_filtered() netlink_broadcast_filtered() do_one_broadcast() netlink_broadcast_deliver() __netlink_sendskb() netlink_deliver_tap() __netlink_deliver_tap_skb() dev_queue_xmit() __dev_queue_xmit() ; with IRQS disabled ... spin_unlock_irqrestore(&local->queue_stop_reason_lock, flags) issues the warning (as reported by syzbot reproducer): WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 5128 at kernel/softirq.c:362 __local_bh_enable_ip+0xc3/0x120 Fix this by implementing a two-phase skb reclamation in 'ieee80211_do_stop()', where actual work is performed outside of a section with interrupts disabled.(CVE-2024-47713)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: mac80211: don't use rate mask for offchannel TX either Like the commit ab9177d83c04 ("wifi: mac80211: don't use rate mask for scanning"), ignore incorrect settings to avoid no supported rate warning reported by syzbot. The syzbot did bisect and found cause is commit 9df66d5b9f45 ("cfg80211: fix default HE tx bitrate mask in 2G band"), which however corrects bitmask of HE MCS and recognizes correctly settings of empty legacy rate plus HE MCS rate instead of returning -EINVAL. As suggestions [1], follow the change of SCAN TX to consider this case of offchannel TX as well. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/6ab2dc9c3afe753ca6fdcdd1421e7a1f47e87b84.camel@sipsolutions.net/T/#m2ac2a6d2be06a37c9c47a3d8a44b4f647ed4f024(CVE-2024-47738)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Check phantom_stream before it is used dcn32_enable_phantom_stream can return null, so returned value must be checked before used. This fixes 1 NULL_RETURNS issue reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-49897)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Pass non-null to dcn20_validate_apply_pipe_split_flags [WHAT & HOW] "dcn20_validate_apply_pipe_split_flags" dereferences merge, and thus it cannot be a null pointer. Let's pass a valid pointer to avoid null dereference. This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-49923)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: stmmac: Fix zero-division error when disabling tc cbs The commit b8c43360f6e4 ("net: stmmac: No need to calculate speed divider when offload is disabled") allows the "port_transmit_rate_kbps" to be set to a value of 0, which is then passed to the "div_s64" function when tc-cbs is disabled. This leads to a zero-division error. When tc-cbs is disabled, the idleslope, sendslope, and credit values the credit values are not required to be configured. Therefore, adding a return statement after setting the txQ mode to DCB when tc-cbs is disabled would prevent a zero-division error.(CVE-2024-49977)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdkfd: amdkfd_free_gtt_mem clear the correct pointer Pass pointer reference to amdgpu_bo_unref to clear the correct pointer, otherwise amdgpu_bo_unref clear the local variable, the original pointer not set to NULL, this could cause use-after-free bug.(CVE-2024-49991)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ethernet: lantiq_etop: fix memory disclosure When applying padding, the buffer is not zeroed, which results in memory disclosure. The mentioned data is observed on the wire. This patch uses skb_put_padto() to pad Ethernet frames properly. The mentioned function zeroes the expanded buffer. In case the packet cannot be padded it is silently dropped. Statistics are also not incremented. This driver does not support statistics in the old 32-bit format or the new 64-bit format. These will be added in the future. In its current form, the patch should be easily backported to stable versions. Ethernet MACs on Amazon-SE and Danube cannot do padding of the packets in hardware, so software padding must be applied.(CVE-2024-49997)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ASoC: qcom: Fix NULL Dereference in asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe() A devm_kzalloc() in asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe() could possibly return NULL pointer. NULL Pointer Dereference may be triggerred without addtional check. Add a NULL check for the returned pointer.(CVE-2024-50103)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/lam: Disable ADDRESS_MASKING in most cases Linear Address Masking (LAM) has a weakness related to transient execution as described in the SLAM paper[1]. Unless Linear Address Space Separation (LASS) is enabled this weakness may be exploitable. Until kernel adds support for LASS[2], only allow LAM for COMPILE_TEST, or when speculation mitigations have been disabled at compile time, otherwise keep LAM disabled. There are no processors in market that support LAM yet, so currently nobody is affected by this issue. [1] SLAM: https://download.vusec.net/papers/slam_sp24.pdf [2] LASS: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230609183632.48706-1-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com/ dhansen: update SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS -> CPU_MITIGATIONS
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nilfs2: fix kernel bug due to missing clearing of buffer delay flag Syzbot reported that after nilfs2 reads a corrupted file system image and degrades to read-only, the BUG_ON check for the buffer delay flag in submit_bh_wbc() may fail, causing a kernel bug. This is because the buffer delay flag is not cleared when clearing the buffer state flags to discard a page/folio or a buffer head. So, fix this. This became necessary when the use of nilfs2's own page clear routine was expanded. This state inconsistency does not occur if the buffer is written normally by log writing.(CVE-2024-50116)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd: Guard against bad data for ATIF ACPI method If a BIOS provides bad data in response to an ATIF method call this causes a NULL pointer dereference in the caller. ? show_regs (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:478 (discriminator 1)) ? __die (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:423 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:434) ? page_fault_oops (arch/x86/mm/fault.c:544 (discriminator 2) arch/x86/mm/fault.c:705 (discriminator 2)) ? do_user_addr_fault (arch/x86/mm/fault.c:440 (discriminator 1) arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1232 (discriminator 1)) ? acpi_ut_update_object_reference (drivers/acpi/acpica/utdelete.c:642) ? exc_page_fault (arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1542) ? asm_exc_page_fault (./arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:623) ? amdgpu_atif_query_backlight_caps.constprop.0 (drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c:387 (discriminator 2)) amdgpu ? amdgpu_atif_query_backlight_caps.constprop.0 (drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c:386 (discriminator 1)) amdgpu It has been encountered on at least one system, so guard for it. (cherry picked from commit c9b7c809b89f24e9372a4e7f02d64c950b07fdee)(CVE-2024-50117)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/vboxvideo: Replace fake VLA at end of vbva_mouse_pointer_shape with real VLA Replace the fake VLA at end of the vbva_mouse_pointer_shape shape with a real VLA to fix a "memcpy: detected field-spanning write error" warning: [ 13.319813] memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 16896) of single field "p->data" at drivers/gpu/drm/vboxvideo/hgsmi_base.c:154 (size 4) [ 13.319841] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1105 at drivers/gpu/drm/vboxvideo/hgsmi_base.c:154 hgsmi_update_pointer_shape+0x192/0x1c0 [vboxvideo] [ 13.320038] Call Trace: [ 13.320173] hgsmi_update_pointer_shape [vboxvideo] [ 13.320184] vbox_cursor_atomic_update [vboxvideo] Note as mentioned in the added comment it seems the original length calculation for the allocated and send hgsmi buffer is 4 bytes too large. Changing this is not the goal of this patch, so this behavior is kept.(CVE-2024-50134)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: firmware: arm_scmi: Fix the double free in scmi_debugfs_common_setup() Clang static checker(scan-build) throws below warning: | drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c:line 2915, column 2 | Attempt to free released memory. When devm_add_action_or_reset() fails, scmi_debugfs_common_cleanup() will run twice which causes double free of 'dbg->name'. Remove the redundant scmi_debugfs_common_cleanup() to fix this problem.(CVE-2024-50159)
(CVE-2024-50194)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: maple_tree: correct tree corruption on spanning store Patch series "maple_tree: correct tree corruption on spanning store", v3. There has been a nasty yet subtle maple tree corruption bug that appears to have been in existence since the inception of the algorithm. This bug seems far more likely to happen since commit f8d112a4e657 ("mm/mmap: avoid zeroing vma tree in mmap_region()"), which is the point at which reports started to be submitted concerning this bug. We were made definitely aware of the bug thanks to the kind efforts of Bert Karwatzki who helped enormously in my being able to track this down and identify the cause of it. The bug arises when an attempt is made to perform a spanning store across two leaf nodes, where the right leaf node is the rightmost child of the shared parent, AND the store completely consumes the right-mode node. This results in mas_wr_spanning_store() mitakenly duplicating the new and existing entries at the maximum pivot within the range, and thus maple tree corruption. The fix patch corrects this by detecting this scenario and disallowing the mistaken duplicate copy. The fix patch commit message goes into great detail as to how this occurs. This series also includes a test which reliably reproduces the issue, and asserts that the fix works correctly. Bert has kindly tested the fix and confirmed it resolved his issues. Also Mikhail Gavrilov kindly reported what appears to be precisely the same bug, which this fix should also resolve. This patch (of 2): There has been a subtle bug present in the maple tree implementation from its inception. This arises from how stores are performed - when a store occurs, it will overwrite overlapping ranges and adjust the tree as necessary to accommodate this. A range may always ultimately span two leaf nodes. In this instance we walk the two leaf nodes, determine which elements are not overwritten to the left and to the right of the start and end of the ranges respectively and then rebalance the tree to contain these entries and the newly inserted one. This kind of store is dubbed a 'spanning store' and is implemented by mas_wr_spanning_store(). In order to reach this stage, mas_store_gfp() invokes mas_wr_preallocate(), mas_wr_store_type() and mas_wr_walk() in turn to walk the tree and update the object (mas) to traverse to the location where the write should be performed, determining its store type. When a spanning store is required, this function returns false stopping at the parent node which contains the target range, and mas_wr_store_type() marks the mas->store_type as wr_spanning_store to denote this fact. When we go to perform the store in mas_wr_spanning_store(), we first determine the elements AFTER the END of the range we wish to store (that is, to the right of the entry to be inserted) - we do this by walking to the NEXT pivot in the tree (i.e. r_mas.last + 1), starting at the node we have just determined contains the range over which we intend to write. We then turn our attention to the entries to the left of the entry we are inserting, whose state is represented by l_mas, and copy these into a 'big node', which is a special node which contains enough slots to contain two leaf node's worth of data. We then copy the entry we wish to store immediately after this - the copy and the insertion of the new entry is performed by mas_store_b_node(). After this we copy the elements to the right of the end of the range which we are inserting, if we have not exceeded the length of the node (i.e. r_mas.offset <= r_mas.end). Herein lies the bug - under very specific circumstances, this logic can break and corrupt the maple tree. Consider the following tree: Height 0 Root Node / \ pivot = 0xffff / \ pivot = ULONG_MAX / ---truncated---(CVE-2024-50200)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: posix-clock: posix-clock: Fix unbalanced locking in pc_clock_settime() If get_clock_desc() succeeds, it calls fget() for the clockid's fd, and get the clk->rwsem read lock, so the error path should release the lock to make the lock balance and fput the clockid's fd to make the refcount balance and release the fd related resource. However the below commit left the error path locked behind resulting in unbalanced locking. Check timespec64_valid_strict() before get_clock_desc() to fix it, because the "ts" is not changed after that. pabeni@redhat.com: fixed commit message typo
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix crash when not using GPIO chip select Add check for the return value of spi_get_csgpiod() to avoid passing a NULL pointer to gpiod_direction_output(), preventing a crash when GPIO chip select is not used. Fix below crash: [ 4.251960] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 [ 4.260762] Mem abort info: [ 4.263556] ESR = 0x0000000096000004 [ 4.267308] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 4.272624] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 4.275681] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 4.278822] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ 4.283704] Data abort info: [ 4.286583] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 4.292074] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 4.297130] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 4.302445] [0000000000000000] user address but active_mm is swapper [ 4.308805] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 4.315072] Modules linked in: [ 4.318124] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-next-20241023-00008-ga20ec42c5fc1 #359 [ 4.328130] Hardware name: LS1046A QDS Board (DT) [ 4.332832] pstate: 40000005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 4.339794] pc : gpiod_direction_output+0x34/0x5c [ 4.344505] lr : gpiod_direction_output+0x18/0x5c [ 4.349208] sp : ffff80008003b8f0 [ 4.352517] x29: ffff80008003b8f0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffffc96bcc7e9068 [ 4.359659] x26: ffffc96bcc6e00b0 x25: ffffc96bcc598398 x24: ffff447400132810 [ 4.366800] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000011e1a300 x21: 0000000000020002 [ 4.373940] x20: 0000000000000000 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 4.381081] x17: ffff44740016e600 x16: 0000000500000003 x15: 0000000000000007 [ 4.388221] x14: 0000000000989680 x13: 0000000000020000 x12: 000000000000001e [ 4.395362] x11: 0044b82fa09b5a53 x10: 0000000000000019 x9 : 0000000000000008 [ 4.402502] x8 : 0000000000000002 x7 : 0000000000000007 x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 4.409641] x5 : 0000000000000200 x4 : 0000000002000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 [ 4.416781] x2 : 0000000000022202 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 [ 4.423921] Call trace: [ 4.426362] gpiod_direction_output+0x34/0x5c (P) [ 4.431067] gpiod_direction_output+0x18/0x5c (L) [ 4.435771] dspi_setup+0x220/0x334(CVE-2024-50224)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: phy: qcom: qmp-usb-legacy: fix NULL-deref on runtime suspend Commit 413db06c05e7 ("phy: qcom-qmp-usb: clean up probe initialisation") removed most users of the platform device driver data from the qcom-qmp-usb driver, but mistakenly also removed the initialisation despite the data still being used in the runtime PM callbacks. This bug was later reproduced when the driver was copied to create the qmp-usb-legacy driver. Restore the driver data initialisation at probe to avoid a NULL-pointer dereference on runtime suspend. Apparently no one uses runtime PM, which currently needs to be enabled manually through sysfs, with these drivers.(CVE-2024-50239)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ACPI: CPPC: Make rmw_lock a raw_spin_lock The following BUG was triggered: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.12.0-rc2-XXX #406 Not tainted ----------------------------- kworker/1:1/62 is trying to lock: ffffff8801593030 (&cpc_ptr->rmw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpc_write+0xcc/0x370 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 2 locks held by kworker/1:1/62: #0: ffffff897ef5ec98 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2c/0x50 #1: ffffff880154e238 (&sg_policy->update_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: sugov_update_shared+0x3c/0x280 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-g9654bd3e8806 #406 Workqueue: 0x0 (events) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0xa4/0x130 show_stack+0x20/0x38 dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0xd0 dump_stack+0x18/0x28 __lock_acquire+0x480/0x1ad8 lock_acquire+0x114/0x310 _raw_spin_lock+0x50/0x70 cpc_write+0xcc/0x370 cppc_set_perf+0xa0/0x3a8 cppc_cpufreq_fast_switch+0x40/0xc0 cpufreq_driver_fast_switch+0x4c/0x218 sugov_update_shared+0x234/0x280 update_load_avg+0x6ec/0x7b8 dequeue_entities+0x108/0x830 dequeue_task_fair+0x58/0x408 __schedule+0x4f0/0x1070 schedule+0x54/0x130 worker_thread+0xc0/0x2e8 kthread+0x130/0x148 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 sugov_update_shared() locks a raw_spinlock while cpc_write() locks a spinlock. To have a correct wait-type order, update rmw_lock to a raw spinlock and ensure that interrupts will be disabled on the CPU holding it. rjw: Changelog edits
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: Fix use-after-free in get_info() ip6table_nat module unload has refcnt warning for UAF. call trace is: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 379 at kernel/module/main.c:853 module_put+0x6f/0x80 Modules linked in: ip6table_nat(-) CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 379 Comm: ip6tables Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-00047-gc2ee9f594da8-dirty #205 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:module_put+0x6f/0x80 Call Trace: <TASK> get_info+0x128/0x180 do_ip6t_get_ctl+0x6a/0x430 nf_getsockopt+0x46/0x80 ipv6_getsockopt+0xb9/0x100 rawv6_getsockopt+0x42/0x190 do_sock_getsockopt+0xaa/0x180 __sys_getsockopt+0x70/0xc0 __x64_sys_getsockopt+0x20/0x30 do_syscall_64+0xa2/0x1a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Concurrent execution of module unload and get_info() trigered the warning. The root cause is as follows: cpu0 cpu1 module_exit //mod->state = MODULE_STATE_GOING ip6table_nat_exit xt_unregister_template kfree(t) //removed from templ_list getinfo() t = xt_find_table_lock list_for_each_entry(tmpl, &xt_templates[af]...) if (strcmp(tmpl->name, name)) continue; //table not found try_module_get list_for_each_entry(t, &xt_net->tables[af]...) return t; //not get refcnt module_put(t->me) //uaf unregister_pernet_subsys //remove table from xt_net list While xt_table module was going away and has been removed from xt_templates list, we couldnt get refcnt of xt_table->me. Check module in xt_net->tables list re-traversal to fix it.(CVE-2024-50257)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fork: only invoke khugepaged, ksm hooks if no error There is no reason to invoke these hooks early against an mm that is in an incomplete state. The change in commit d24062914837 ("fork: use __mt_dup() to duplicate maple tree in dup_mmap()") makes this more pertinent as we may be in a state where entries in the maple tree are not yet consistent. Their placement early in dup_mmap() only appears to have been meaningful for early error checking, and since functionally it'd require a very small allocation to fail (in practice 'too small to fail') that'd only occur in the most dire circumstances, meaning the fork would fail or be OOM'd in any case. Since both khugepaged and KSM tracking are there to provide optimisations to memory performance rather than critical functionality, it doesn't really matter all that much if, under such dire memory pressure, we fail to register an mm with these. As a result, we follow the example of commit d2081b2bf819 ("mm: khugepaged: make khugepaged_enter() void function") and make ksm_fork() a void function also. We only expose the mm to these functions once we are done with them and only if no error occurred in the fork operation.(CVE-2024-50263)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: USB: serial: io_edgeport: fix use after free in debug printk The "dev_dbg(&urb->dev->dev, ..." which happens after usb_free_urb(urb) is a use after free of the "urb" pointer. Store the "dev" pointer at the start of the function to avoid this issue.(CVE-2024-50267)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd() The "*cmd" variable can be controlled by the user via debugfs. That means "new_cam" can be as high as 255 while the size of the uc->updated[] array is UCSI_MAX_ALTMODES (30). The call tree is: ucsi_cmd() // val comes from simple_attr_write_xsigned() -> ucsi_send_command() -> ucsi_send_command_common() -> ucsi_run_command() // calls ucsi->ops->sync_control() -> ucsi_ccg_sync_control()(CVE-2024-50268)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm cache: fix out-of-bounds access to the dirty bitset when resizing dm-cache checks the dirty bits of the cache blocks to be dropped when shrinking the fast device, but an index bug in bitset iteration causes out-of-bounds access. Reproduce steps: 1. create a cache device of 1024 cache blocks (128 bytes dirty bitset) dmsetup create cmeta --table "0 8192 linear /dev/sdc 0" dmsetup create cdata --table "0 131072 linear /dev/sdc 8192" dmsetup create corig --table "0 524288 linear /dev/sdc 262144" dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/mapper/cmeta bs=4k count=1 oflag=direct dmsetup create cache --table "0 524288 cache /dev/mapper/cmeta \ /dev/mapper/cdata /dev/mapper/corig 128 2 metadata2 writethrough smq 0" 2. shrink the fast device to 512 cache blocks, triggering out-of-bounds access to the dirty bitset (offset 0x80) dmsetup suspend cache dmsetup reload cdata --table "0 65536 linear /dev/sdc 8192" dmsetup resume cdata dmsetup resume cache KASAN reports: BUG: KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in cache_preresume+0x269/0x7b0 Read of size 8 at addr ffffc900000f3080 by task dmsetup/131 (...snip...) The buggy address belongs to the virtual mapping at [ffffc900000f3000, ffffc900000f5000) created by: cache_ctr+0x176a/0x35f0 (...snip...) Memory state around the buggy address: ffffc900000f2f80: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 ffffc900000f3000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >ffffc900000f3080: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 ^ ffffc900000f3100: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 ffffc900000f3180: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 Fix by making the index post-incremented.(CVE-2024-50279)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: v4l2-tpg: prevent the risk of a division by zero As reported by Coverity, the logic at tpg_precalculate_line() blindly rescales the buffer even when scaled_witdh is equal to zero. If this ever happens, this will cause a division by zero. Instead, add a WARN_ON_ONCE() to trigger such cases and return without doing any precalculation.(CVE-2024-50287)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: cx24116: prevent overflows on SNR calculus as reported by Coverity, if reading SNR registers fail, a negative number will be returned, causing an underflow when reading SNR registers. Prevent that.(CVE-2024-50290)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ASoC: stm32: spdifrx: fix dma channel release in stm32_spdifrx_remove In case of error when requesting ctrl_chan DMA channel, ctrl_chan is not null. So the release of the dma channel leads to the following issue: [ 4.879000] st,stm32-spdifrx 500d0000.audio-controller: dma_request_slave_channel error -19 [ 4.888975] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000000000000003d [...] [ 5.096577] Call trace: [ 5.099099] dma_release_channel+0x24/0x100 [ 5.103235] stm32_spdifrx_remove+0x24/0x60 [snd_soc_stm32_spdifrx] [ 5.109494] stm32_spdifrx_probe+0x320/0x4c4 [snd_soc_stm32_spdifrx] To avoid this issue, release channel only if the pointer is valid.(CVE-2024-50292)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: security/keys: fix slab-out-of-bounds in key_task_permission KASAN reports an out of bounds read: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in __kuid_val include/linux/uidgid.h:36 BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in uid_eq include/linux/uidgid.h:63 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in key_task_permission+0x394/0x410 security/keys/permission.c:54 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88813c3ab618 by task stress-ng/4362 CPU: 2 PID: 4362 Comm: stress-ng Not tainted 5.10.0-14930-gafbffd6c3ede #15 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:82 [inline] dump_stack+0x107/0x167 lib/dump_stack.c:123 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x19/0x170 mm/kasan/report.c:400 __kasan_report.cold+0x6c/0x84 mm/kasan/report.c:560 kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 mm/kasan/report.c:585 __kuid_val include/linux/uidgid.h:36 [inline] uid_eq include/linux/uidgid.h:63 [inline] key_task_permission+0x394/0x410 security/keys/permission.c:54 search_nested_keyrings+0x90e/0xe90 security/keys/keyring.c:793 This issue was also reported by syzbot. It can be reproduced by following these steps(more details [1]): 1. Obtain more than 32 inputs that have similar hashes, which ends with the pattern '0xxxxxxxe6'. 2. Reboot and add the keys obtained in step 1. The reproducer demonstrates how this issue happened: 1. In the search_nested_keyrings function, when it iterates through the slots in a node(below tag ascend_to_node), if the slot pointer is meta and node->back_pointer != NULL(it means a root), it will proceed to descend_to_node. However, there is an exception. If node is the root, and one of the slots points to a shortcut, it will be treated as a keyring. 2. Whether the ptr is keyring decided by keyring_ptr_is_keyring function. However, KEYRING_PTR_SUBTYPE is 0x2UL, the same as ASSOC_ARRAY_PTR_SUBTYPE_MASK. 3. When 32 keys with the similar hashes are added to the tree, the ROOT has keys with hashes that are not similar (e.g. slot 0) and it splits NODE A without using a shortcut. When NODE A is filled with keys that all hashes are xxe6, the keys are similar, NODE A will split with a shortcut. Finally, it forms the tree as shown below, where slot 6 points to a shortcut. NODE A +------>+---+ ROOT | | 0 | xxe6 +---+ | +---+ xxxx | 0 | shortcut : : xxe6 +---+ | +---+ xxe6 : : | | | xxe6 +---+ | +---+ | 6 |---+ : : xxe6 +---+ +---+ xxe6 : : | f | xxe6 +---+ +---+ xxe6 | f | +---+ 4. As mentioned above, If a slot(slot 6) of the root points to a shortcut, it may be mistakenly transferred to a key*, leading to a read out-of-bounds read. To fix this issue, one should jump to descend_to_node if the ptr is a shortcut, regardless of whether the node is root or not. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/1cfa878e-8c7b-4570-8606-21daf5e13ce7@huaweicloud.com/ jarkko: tweaked the commit message a bit to have an appropriate closes tag.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: HID: core: zero-initialize the report buffer Since the report buffer is used by all kinds of drivers in various ways, let's zero-initialize it during allocation to make sure that it can't be ever used to leak kernel memory via specially-crafted report.(CVE-2024-50302)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: stop qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog on TC_H_ROOT In qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog, Qdiscs with major handle ffff: are assumed to be either root or ingress. This assumption is bogus since it's valid to create egress qdiscs with major handle ffff: Budimir Markovic found that for qdiscs like DRR that maintain an active class list, it will cause a UAF with a dangling class pointer. In 066a3b5b2346, the concern was to avoid iterating over the ingress qdisc since its parent is itself. The proper fix is to stop when parent TC_H_ROOT is reached because the only way to retrieve ingress is when a hierarchy which does not contain a ffff: major handle call into qdisc_lookup with TC_H_MAJ(TC_H_ROOT). In the scenario where major ffff: is an egress qdisc in any of the tree levels, the updates will also propagate to TC_H_ROOT, which then the iteration must stop. net/sched/sch_api.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)(CVE-2024-53057)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: firmware: arm_scmi: Fix slab-use-after-free in scmi_bus_notifier() The scmi_dev->name is released prematurely in __scmi_device_destroy(), which causes slab-use-after-free when accessing scmi_dev->name in scmi_bus_notifier(). So move the release of scmi_dev->name to scmi_device_release() to avoid slab-use-after-free. | BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in strncmp+0xe4/0xec | Read of size 1 at addr ffffff80a482bcc0 by task swapper/0/1 | | CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.6.38-debug #1 | Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SA8775P Ride (DT) | Call trace: | dump_backtrace+0x94/0x114 | show_stack+0x18/0x24 | dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x60 | print_report+0xf4/0x5b0 | kasan_report+0xa4/0xec | __asan_report_load1_noabort+0x20/0x2c | strncmp+0xe4/0xec | scmi_bus_notifier+0x5c/0x54c | notifier_call_chain+0xb4/0x31c | blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x68/0x9c | bus_notify+0x54/0x78 | device_del+0x1bc/0x840 | device_unregister+0x20/0xb4 | __scmi_device_destroy+0xac/0x280 | scmi_device_destroy+0x94/0xd0 | scmi_chan_setup+0x524/0x750 | scmi_probe+0x7fc/0x1508 | platform_probe+0xc4/0x19c | really_probe+0x32c/0x99c | __driver_probe_device+0x15c/0x3c4 | driver_probe_device+0x5c/0x170 | __driver_attach+0x1c8/0x440 | bus_for_each_dev+0xf4/0x178 | driver_attach+0x3c/0x58 | bus_add_driver+0x234/0x4d4 | driver_register+0xf4/0x3c0 | __platform_driver_register+0x60/0x88 | scmi_driver_init+0xb0/0x104 | do_one_initcall+0xb4/0x664 | kernel_init_freeable+0x3c8/0x894 | kernel_init+0x24/0x1e8 | ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 | | Allocated by task 1: | kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x54 | kasan_set_track+0x2c/0x40 | kasan_save_alloc_info+0x24/0x34 | __kasan_kmalloc+0xa0/0xb8 | __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x6c/0x104 | kstrdup+0x48/0x84 | kstrdup_const+0x34/0x40 | __scmi_device_create.part.0+0x8c/0x408 | scmi_device_create+0x104/0x370 | scmi_chan_setup+0x2a0/0x750 | scmi_probe+0x7fc/0x1508 | platform_probe+0xc4/0x19c | really_probe+0x32c/0x99c | __driver_probe_device+0x15c/0x3c4 | driver_probe_device+0x5c/0x170 | __driver_attach+0x1c8/0x440 | bus_for_each_dev+0xf4/0x178 | driver_attach+0x3c/0x58 | bus_add_driver+0x234/0x4d4 | driver_register+0xf4/0x3c0 | __platform_driver_register+0x60/0x88 | scmi_driver_init+0xb0/0x104 | do_one_initcall+0xb4/0x664 | kernel_init_freeable+0x3c8/0x894 | kernel_init+0x24/0x1e8 | ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 | | Freed by task 1: | kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x54 | kasan_set_track+0x2c/0x40 | kasan_save_free_info+0x38/0x5c | __kasan_slab_free+0xe8/0x164 | __kmem_cache_free+0x11c/0x230 | kfree+0x70/0x130 | kfree_const+0x20/0x40 | __scmi_device_destroy+0x70/0x280 | scmi_device_destroy+0x94/0xd0 | scmi_chan_setup+0x524/0x750 | scmi_probe+0x7fc/0x1508 | platform_probe+0xc4/0x19c | really_probe+0x32c/0x99c | __driver_probe_device+0x15c/0x3c4 | driver_probe_device+0x5c/0x170 | __driver_attach+0x1c8/0x440 | bus_for_each_dev+0xf4/0x178 | driver_attach+0x3c/0x58 | bus_add_driver+0x234/0x4d4 | driver_register+0xf4/0x3c0 | __platform_driver_register+0x60/0x88 | scmi_driver_init+0xb0/0x104 | do_one_initcall+0xb4/0x664 | kernel_init_freeable+0x3c8/0x894 | kernel_init+0x24/0x1e8 | ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20(CVE-2024-53068)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: platform/x86/amd/pmc: Detect when STB is not available Loading the amd_pmc module as: amd_pmc enable_stb=1 ...can result in the following messages in the kernel ring buffer: amd_pmc AMDI0009:00: SMU cmd failed. err: 0xff ioremap on RAM at 0x0000000000000000 - 0x0000000000ffffff WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 2151 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:217 __ioremap_caller+0x2cd/0x340 Further debugging reveals that this occurs when the requests for S2D_PHYS_ADDR_LOW and S2D_PHYS_ADDR_HIGH return a value of 0, indicating that the STB is inaccessible. To prevent the ioremap warning and provide clarity to the user, handle the invalid address and display an error message.(CVE-2024-53072)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: virtio_net: Add hash_key_length check Add hash_key_length check in virtnet_probe() to avoid possible out of bound errors when setting/reading the hash key.(CVE-2024-53082)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: uvcvideo: Skip parsing frames of type UVC_VS_UNDEFINED in uvc_parse_format This can lead to out of bounds writes since frames of this type were not taken into account when calculating the size of the frames buffer in uvc_parse_streaming.(CVE-2024-53104)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vp_vdpa: fix id_table array not null terminated error Allocate one extra virtio_device_id as null terminator, otherwise vdpa_mgmtdev_get_classes() may iterate multiple times and visit undefined memory.(CVE-2024-53110)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: uncache inode which has failed entering the group Syzbot has reported the following BUG: kernel BUG at fs/ocfs2/uptodate.c:509! ... Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body+0x5f/0xb0 ? die+0x9e/0xc0 ? do_trap+0x15a/0x3a0 ? ocfs2_set_new_buffer_uptodate+0x145/0x160 ? do_error_trap+0x1dc/0x2c0 ? ocfs2_set_new_buffer_uptodate+0x145/0x160 ? __pfx_do_error_trap+0x10/0x10 ? handle_invalid_op+0x34/0x40 ? ocfs2_set_new_buffer_uptodate+0x145/0x160 ? exc_invalid_op+0x38/0x50 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? ocfs2_set_new_buffer_uptodate+0x2e/0x160 ? ocfs2_set_new_buffer_uptodate+0x144/0x160 ? ocfs2_set_new_buffer_uptodate+0x145/0x160 ocfs2_group_add+0x39f/0x15a0 ? __pfx_ocfs2_group_add+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? mnt_get_write_access+0x68/0x2b0 ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 ? rcu_read_lock_any_held+0xb7/0x160 ? __pfx_rcu_read_lock_any_held+0x10/0x10 ? smack_log+0x123/0x540 ? mnt_get_write_access+0x68/0x2b0 ? mnt_get_write_access+0x68/0x2b0 ? mnt_get_write_access+0x226/0x2b0 ocfs2_ioctl+0x65e/0x7d0 ? __pfx_ocfs2_ioctl+0x10/0x10 ? smack_file_ioctl+0x29e/0x3a0 ? __pfx_smack_file_ioctl+0x10/0x10 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x43d/0x780 ? __pfx_lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_ocfs2_ioctl+0x10/0x10 __se_sys_ioctl+0xfb/0x170 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f ... </TASK> When 'ioctl(OCFS2_IOC_GROUP_ADD, ...)' has failed for the particular inode in 'ocfs2_verify_group_and_input()', corresponding buffer head remains cached and subsequent call to the same 'ioctl()' for the same inode issues the BUG() in 'ocfs2_set_new_buffer_uptodate()' (trying to cache the same buffer head of that inode). Fix this by uncaching the buffer head with 'ocfs2_remove_from_cache()' on error path in 'ocfs2_group_add()'.(CVE-2024-53112)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: sync_linked_regs() must preserve subreg_def Range propagation must not affect subreg_def marks, otherwise the following example is rewritten by verifier incorrectly when BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 flag is set: 0: call bpf_ktime_get_ns call bpf_ktime_get_ns 1: r0 &= 0x7fffffff after verifier r0 &= 0x7fffffff 2: w1 = w0 rewrites w1 = w0 3: if w0 < 10 goto +0 --------------> r11 = 0x2f5674a6 (r) 4: r1 >>= 32 r11 <<= 32 (r) 5: r0 = r1 r1 |= r11 (r) 6: exit; if w0 < 0xa goto pc+0 r1 >>= 32 r0 = r1 exit (or zero extension of w1 at (2) is missing for architectures that require zero extension for upper register half). The following happens w/o this patch: - r0 is marked as not a subreg at (0); - w1 is marked as subreg at (2); - w1 subreg_def is overridden at (3) by copy_register_state(); - w1 is read at (5) but mark_insn_zext() does not mark (2) for zero extension, because w1 subreg_def is not set; - because of BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 flag verifier inserts random value for hi32 bits of (2) (marked (r)); - this random value is read at (5).(CVE-2024-53125)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nilfs2: fix null-ptr-deref in block_dirty_buffer tracepoint When using the "block:block_dirty_buffer" tracepoint, mark_buffer_dirty() may cause a NULL pointer dereference, or a general protection fault when KASAN is enabled. This happens because, since the tracepoint was added in mark_buffer_dirty(), it references the dev_t member bh->b_bdev->bd_dev regardless of whether the buffer head has a pointer to a block_device structure. In the current implementation, nilfs_grab_buffer(), which grabs a buffer to read (or create) a block of metadata, including b-tree node blocks, does not set the block device, but instead does so only if the buffer is not in the "uptodate" state for each of its caller block reading functions. However, if the uptodate flag is set on a folio/page, and the buffer heads are detached from it by try_to_free_buffers(), and new buffer heads are then attached by create_empty_buffers(), the uptodate flag may be restored to each buffer without the block device being set to bh->b_bdev, and mark_buffer_dirty() may be called later in that state, resulting in the bug mentioned above. Fix this issue by making nilfs_grab_buffer() always set the block device of the super block structure to the buffer head, regardless of the state of the buffer's uptodate flag.(CVE-2024-53130)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-64.0.0.61.oe2403"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xhci: Handle TD clearing for multiple streams case When multiple streams are in use, multiple TDs might be in flight when an endpoint is stopped. We need to issue a Set TR Dequeue Pointer for each, to ensure everything is reset properly and the caches cleared. Change the logic so that any N\u0026gt;1 TDs found active for different streams are deferred until after the first one is processed, calling xhci_invalidate_cancelled_tds() again from xhci_handle_cmd_set_deq() to queue another command until we are done with all of them. Also change the error/\u0026quot;should never happen\u0026quot; paths to ensure we at least clear any affected TDs, even if we can\u0026apos;t issue a command to clear the hardware cache, and complain loudly with an xhci_warn() if this ever happens. This problem case dates back to commit e9df17eb1408 (\u0026quot;USB: xhci: Correct assumptions about number of rings per endpoint.\u0026quot;) early on in the XHCI driver\u0026apos;s life, when stream support was first added. It was then identified but not fixed nor made into a warning in commit 674f8438c121 (\u0026quot;xhci: split handling halted endpoints into two steps\u0026quot;), which added a FIXME comment for the problem case (without materially changing the behavior as far as I can tell, though the new logic made the problem more obvious). Then later, in commit 94f339147fc3 (\u0026quot;xhci: Fix failure to give back some cached cancelled URBs.\u0026quot;), it was acknowledged again. [Mathias: commit 94f339147fc3 (\u0026quot;xhci: Fix failure to give back some cached cancelled URBs.\u0026quot;) was a targeted regression fix to the previously mentioned patch. Users reported issues with usb stuck after unmounting/disconnecting UAS devices. This rolled back the TD clearing of multiple streams to its original state.] Apparently the commit author was aware of the problem (yet still chose to submit it): It was still mentioned as a FIXME, an xhci_dbg() was added to log the problem condition, and the remaining issue was mentioned in the commit description. The choice of making the log type xhci_dbg() for what is, at this point, a completely unhandled and known broken condition is puzzling and unfortunate, as it guarantees that no actual users would see the log in production, thereby making it nigh undebuggable (indeed, even if you turn on DEBUG, the message doesn\u0026apos;t really hint at there being a problem at all). It took me *months* of random xHC crashes to finally find a reliable repro and be able to do a deep dive debug session, which could all have been avoided had this unhandled, broken condition been actually reported with a warning, as it should have been as a bug intentionally left in unfixed (never mind that it shouldn\u0026apos;t have been left in at all). \u0026gt; Another fix to solve clearing the caches of all stream rings with \u0026gt; cancelled TDs is needed, but not as urgent. 3 years after that statement and 14 years after the original bug was introduced, I think it\u0026apos;s finally time to fix it. And maybe next time let\u0026apos;s not leave bugs unfixed (that are actually worse than the original bug), and let\u0026apos;s actually get people to review kernel commits please. Fixes xHC crashes and IOMMU faults with UAS devices when handling errors/faults. Easiest repro is to use `hdparm` to mark an early sector (e.g. 1024) on a disk as bad, then `cat /dev/sdX \u0026gt; /dev/null` in a loop. At least in the case of JMicron controllers, the read errors end up having to cancel two TDs (for two queued requests to different streams) and the one that didn\u0026apos;t get cleared properly ends up faulting the xHC entirely when it tries to access DMA pages that have since been unmapped, referred to by the stale TDs. This normally happens quickly (after two or three loops). After this fix, I left the `cat` in a loop running overnight and experienced no xHC failures, with all read errors recovered properly. Repro\u0026apos;d and tested on an Apple M1 Mac Mini (dwc3 host). On systems without an IOMMU, this bug would instead silently corrupt freed memory, making this a ---truncated---(CVE-2024-40927)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drivers: media: dvb-frontends/rtl2830: fix an out-of-bounds write error Ensure index in rtl2830_pid_filter does not exceed 31 to prevent out-of-bounds access. dev-\u0026gt;filters is a 32-bit value, so set_bit and clear_bit functions should only operate on indices from 0 to 31. If index is 32, it will attempt to access a non-existent 33rd bit, leading to out-of-bounds access. Change the boundary check from index \u0026gt; 32 to index \u0026gt;= 32 to resolve this issue.(CVE-2024-47697)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: mac80211: use two-phase skb reclamation in ieee80211_do_stop() Since \u0026apos;__dev_queue_xmit()\u0026apos; should be called with interrupts enabled, the following backtrace: ieee80211_do_stop() ... spin_lock_irqsave(\u0026amp;local-\u0026gt;queue_stop_reason_lock, flags) ... ieee80211_free_txskb() ieee80211_report_used_skb() ieee80211_report_ack_skb() cfg80211_mgmt_tx_status_ext() nl80211_frame_tx_status() genlmsg_multicast_netns() genlmsg_multicast_netns_filtered() nlmsg_multicast_filtered() netlink_broadcast_filtered() do_one_broadcast() netlink_broadcast_deliver() __netlink_sendskb() netlink_deliver_tap() __netlink_deliver_tap_skb() dev_queue_xmit() __dev_queue_xmit() ; with IRQS disabled ... spin_unlock_irqrestore(\u0026amp;local-\u0026gt;queue_stop_reason_lock, flags) issues the warning (as reported by syzbot reproducer): WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 5128 at kernel/softirq.c:362 __local_bh_enable_ip+0xc3/0x120 Fix this by implementing a two-phase skb reclamation in \u0026apos;ieee80211_do_stop()\u0026apos;, where actual work is performed outside of a section with interrupts disabled.(CVE-2024-47713)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: mac80211: don\u0026apos;t use rate mask for offchannel TX either Like the commit ab9177d83c04 (\u0026quot;wifi: mac80211: don\u0026apos;t use rate mask for scanning\u0026quot;), ignore incorrect settings to avoid no supported rate warning reported by syzbot. The syzbot did bisect and found cause is commit 9df66d5b9f45 (\u0026quot;cfg80211: fix default HE tx bitrate mask in 2G band\u0026quot;), which however corrects bitmask of HE MCS and recognizes correctly settings of empty legacy rate plus HE MCS rate instead of returning -EINVAL. As suggestions [1], follow the change of SCAN TX to consider this case of offchannel TX as well. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/6ab2dc9c3afe753ca6fdcdd1421e7a1f47e87b84.camel@sipsolutions.net/T/#m2ac2a6d2be06a37c9c47a3d8a44b4f647ed4f024(CVE-2024-47738)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Check phantom_stream before it is used dcn32_enable_phantom_stream can return null, so returned value must be checked before used. This fixes 1 NULL_RETURNS issue reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-49897)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Pass non-null to dcn20_validate_apply_pipe_split_flags [WHAT \u0026amp; HOW] \u0026quot;dcn20_validate_apply_pipe_split_flags\u0026quot; dereferences merge, and thus it cannot be a null pointer. Let\u0026apos;s pass a valid pointer to avoid null dereference. This fixes 2 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-49923)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: stmmac: Fix zero-division error when disabling tc cbs The commit b8c43360f6e4 (\u0026quot;net: stmmac: No need to calculate speed divider when offload is disabled\u0026quot;) allows the \u0026quot;port_transmit_rate_kbps\u0026quot; to be set to a value of 0, which is then passed to the \u0026quot;div_s64\u0026quot; function when tc-cbs is disabled. This leads to a zero-division error. When tc-cbs is disabled, the idleslope, sendslope, and credit values the credit values are not required to be configured. Therefore, adding a return statement after setting the txQ mode to DCB when tc-cbs is disabled would prevent a zero-division error.(CVE-2024-49977)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdkfd: amdkfd_free_gtt_mem clear the correct pointer Pass pointer reference to amdgpu_bo_unref to clear the correct pointer, otherwise amdgpu_bo_unref clear the local variable, the original pointer not set to NULL, this could cause use-after-free bug.(CVE-2024-49991)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ethernet: lantiq_etop: fix memory disclosure When applying padding, the buffer is not zeroed, which results in memory disclosure. The mentioned data is observed on the wire. This patch uses skb_put_padto() to pad Ethernet frames properly. The mentioned function zeroes the expanded buffer. In case the packet cannot be padded it is silently dropped. Statistics are also not incremented. This driver does not support statistics in the old 32-bit format or the new 64-bit format. These will be added in the future. In its current form, the patch should be easily backported to stable versions. Ethernet MACs on Amazon-SE and Danube cannot do padding of the packets in hardware, so software padding must be applied.(CVE-2024-49997)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ASoC: qcom: Fix NULL Dereference in asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe() A devm_kzalloc() in asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe() could possibly return NULL pointer. NULL Pointer Dereference may be triggerred without addtional check. Add a NULL check for the returned pointer.(CVE-2024-50103)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/lam: Disable ADDRESS_MASKING in most cases Linear Address Masking (LAM) has a weakness related to transient execution as described in the SLAM paper[1]. Unless Linear Address Space Separation (LASS) is enabled this weakness may be exploitable. Until kernel adds support for LASS[2], only allow LAM for COMPILE_TEST, or when speculation mitigations have been disabled at compile time, otherwise keep LAM disabled. There are no processors in market that support LAM yet, so currently nobody is affected by this issue. [1] SLAM: https://download.vusec.net/papers/slam_sp24.pdf [2] LASS: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230609183632.48706-1-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com/ [ dhansen: update SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS -\u0026gt; CPU_MITIGATIONS ](CVE-2024-50112)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nilfs2: fix kernel bug due to missing clearing of buffer delay flag Syzbot reported that after nilfs2 reads a corrupted file system image and degrades to read-only, the BUG_ON check for the buffer delay flag in submit_bh_wbc() may fail, causing a kernel bug. This is because the buffer delay flag is not cleared when clearing the buffer state flags to discard a page/folio or a buffer head. So, fix this. This became necessary when the use of nilfs2\u0026apos;s own page clear routine was expanded. This state inconsistency does not occur if the buffer is written normally by log writing.(CVE-2024-50116)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd: Guard against bad data for ATIF ACPI method If a BIOS provides bad data in response to an ATIF method call this causes a NULL pointer dereference in the caller. ``` ? show_regs (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:478 (discriminator 1)) ? __die (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:423 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:434) ? page_fault_oops (arch/x86/mm/fault.c:544 (discriminator 2) arch/x86/mm/fault.c:705 (discriminator 2)) ? do_user_addr_fault (arch/x86/mm/fault.c:440 (discriminator 1) arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1232 (discriminator 1)) ? acpi_ut_update_object_reference (drivers/acpi/acpica/utdelete.c:642) ? exc_page_fault (arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1542) ? asm_exc_page_fault (./arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:623) ? amdgpu_atif_query_backlight_caps.constprop.0 (drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c:387 (discriminator 2)) amdgpu ? amdgpu_atif_query_backlight_caps.constprop.0 (drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c:386 (discriminator 1)) amdgpu ``` It has been encountered on at least one system, so guard for it. (cherry picked from commit c9b7c809b89f24e9372a4e7f02d64c950b07fdee)(CVE-2024-50117)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/vboxvideo: Replace fake VLA at end of vbva_mouse_pointer_shape with real VLA Replace the fake VLA at end of the vbva_mouse_pointer_shape shape with a real VLA to fix a \u0026quot;memcpy: detected field-spanning write error\u0026quot; warning: [ 13.319813] memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 16896) of single field \u0026quot;p-\u0026gt;data\u0026quot; at drivers/gpu/drm/vboxvideo/hgsmi_base.c:154 (size 4) [ 13.319841] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1105 at drivers/gpu/drm/vboxvideo/hgsmi_base.c:154 hgsmi_update_pointer_shape+0x192/0x1c0 [vboxvideo] [ 13.320038] Call Trace: [ 13.320173] hgsmi_update_pointer_shape [vboxvideo] [ 13.320184] vbox_cursor_atomic_update [vboxvideo] Note as mentioned in the added comment it seems the original length calculation for the allocated and send hgsmi buffer is 4 bytes too large. Changing this is not the goal of this patch, so this behavior is kept.(CVE-2024-50134)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: firmware: arm_scmi: Fix the double free in scmi_debugfs_common_setup() Clang static checker(scan-build) throws below warning\uff1a | drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c:line 2915, column 2 | Attempt to free released memory. When devm_add_action_or_reset() fails, scmi_debugfs_common_cleanup() will run twice which causes double free of \u0026apos;dbg-\u0026gt;name\u0026apos;. Remove the redundant scmi_debugfs_common_cleanup() to fix this problem.(CVE-2024-50159)\r\n\r\n(CVE-2024-50194)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: maple_tree: correct tree corruption on spanning store Patch series \u0026quot;maple_tree: correct tree corruption on spanning store\u0026quot;, v3. There has been a nasty yet subtle maple tree corruption bug that appears to have been in existence since the inception of the algorithm. This bug seems far more likely to happen since commit f8d112a4e657 (\u0026quot;mm/mmap: avoid zeroing vma tree in mmap_region()\u0026quot;), which is the point at which reports started to be submitted concerning this bug. We were made definitely aware of the bug thanks to the kind efforts of Bert Karwatzki who helped enormously in my being able to track this down and identify the cause of it. The bug arises when an attempt is made to perform a spanning store across two leaf nodes, where the right leaf node is the rightmost child of the shared parent, AND the store completely consumes the right-mode node. This results in mas_wr_spanning_store() mitakenly duplicating the new and existing entries at the maximum pivot within the range, and thus maple tree corruption. The fix patch corrects this by detecting this scenario and disallowing the mistaken duplicate copy. The fix patch commit message goes into great detail as to how this occurs. This series also includes a test which reliably reproduces the issue, and asserts that the fix works correctly. Bert has kindly tested the fix and confirmed it resolved his issues. Also Mikhail Gavrilov kindly reported what appears to be precisely the same bug, which this fix should also resolve. This patch (of 2): There has been a subtle bug present in the maple tree implementation from its inception. This arises from how stores are performed - when a store occurs, it will overwrite overlapping ranges and adjust the tree as necessary to accommodate this. A range may always ultimately span two leaf nodes. In this instance we walk the two leaf nodes, determine which elements are not overwritten to the left and to the right of the start and end of the ranges respectively and then rebalance the tree to contain these entries and the newly inserted one. This kind of store is dubbed a \u0026apos;spanning store\u0026apos; and is implemented by mas_wr_spanning_store(). In order to reach this stage, mas_store_gfp() invokes mas_wr_preallocate(), mas_wr_store_type() and mas_wr_walk() in turn to walk the tree and update the object (mas) to traverse to the location where the write should be performed, determining its store type. When a spanning store is required, this function returns false stopping at the parent node which contains the target range, and mas_wr_store_type() marks the mas-\u0026gt;store_type as wr_spanning_store to denote this fact. When we go to perform the store in mas_wr_spanning_store(), we first determine the elements AFTER the END of the range we wish to store (that is, to the right of the entry to be inserted) - we do this by walking to the NEXT pivot in the tree (i.e. r_mas.last + 1), starting at the node we have just determined contains the range over which we intend to write. We then turn our attention to the entries to the left of the entry we are inserting, whose state is represented by l_mas, and copy these into a \u0026apos;big node\u0026apos;, which is a special node which contains enough slots to contain two leaf node\u0026apos;s worth of data. We then copy the entry we wish to store immediately after this - the copy and the insertion of the new entry is performed by mas_store_b_node(). After this we copy the elements to the right of the end of the range which we are inserting, if we have not exceeded the length of the node (i.e. r_mas.offset \u0026lt;= r_mas.end). Herein lies the bug - under very specific circumstances, this logic can break and corrupt the maple tree. Consider the following tree: Height 0 Root Node / \\ pivot = 0xffff / \\ pivot = ULONG_MAX / ---truncated---(CVE-2024-50200)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: posix-clock: posix-clock: Fix unbalanced locking in pc_clock_settime() If get_clock_desc() succeeds, it calls fget() for the clockid\u0026apos;s fd, and get the clk-\u0026gt;rwsem read lock, so the error path should release the lock to make the lock balance and fput the clockid\u0026apos;s fd to make the refcount balance and release the fd related resource. However the below commit left the error path locked behind resulting in unbalanced locking. Check timespec64_valid_strict() before get_clock_desc() to fix it, because the \u0026quot;ts\u0026quot; is not changed after that. [pabeni@redhat.com: fixed commit message typo](CVE-2024-50210)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix crash when not using GPIO chip select Add check for the return value of spi_get_csgpiod() to avoid passing a NULL pointer to gpiod_direction_output(), preventing a crash when GPIO chip select is not used. Fix below crash: [ 4.251960] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 [ 4.260762] Mem abort info: [ 4.263556] ESR = 0x0000000096000004 [ 4.267308] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 4.272624] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 4.275681] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 4.278822] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ 4.283704] Data abort info: [ 4.286583] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 4.292074] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 4.297130] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 4.302445] [0000000000000000] user address but active_mm is swapper [ 4.308805] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 4.315072] Modules linked in: [ 4.318124] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-next-20241023-00008-ga20ec42c5fc1 #359 [ 4.328130] Hardware name: LS1046A QDS Board (DT) [ 4.332832] pstate: 40000005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 4.339794] pc : gpiod_direction_output+0x34/0x5c [ 4.344505] lr : gpiod_direction_output+0x18/0x5c [ 4.349208] sp : ffff80008003b8f0 [ 4.352517] x29: ffff80008003b8f0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffffc96bcc7e9068 [ 4.359659] x26: ffffc96bcc6e00b0 x25: ffffc96bcc598398 x24: ffff447400132810 [ 4.366800] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000011e1a300 x21: 0000000000020002 [ 4.373940] x20: 0000000000000000 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 4.381081] x17: ffff44740016e600 x16: 0000000500000003 x15: 0000000000000007 [ 4.388221] x14: 0000000000989680 x13: 0000000000020000 x12: 000000000000001e [ 4.395362] x11: 0044b82fa09b5a53 x10: 0000000000000019 x9 : 0000000000000008 [ 4.402502] x8 : 0000000000000002 x7 : 0000000000000007 x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 4.409641] x5 : 0000000000000200 x4 : 0000000002000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 [ 4.416781] x2 : 0000000000022202 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 [ 4.423921] Call trace: [ 4.426362] gpiod_direction_output+0x34/0x5c (P) [ 4.431067] gpiod_direction_output+0x18/0x5c (L) [ 4.435771] dspi_setup+0x220/0x334(CVE-2024-50224)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: phy: qcom: qmp-usb-legacy: fix NULL-deref on runtime suspend Commit 413db06c05e7 (\u0026quot;phy: qcom-qmp-usb: clean up probe initialisation\u0026quot;) removed most users of the platform device driver data from the qcom-qmp-usb driver, but mistakenly also removed the initialisation despite the data still being used in the runtime PM callbacks. This bug was later reproduced when the driver was copied to create the qmp-usb-legacy driver. Restore the driver data initialisation at probe to avoid a NULL-pointer dereference on runtime suspend. Apparently no one uses runtime PM, which currently needs to be enabled manually through sysfs, with these drivers.(CVE-2024-50239)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ACPI: CPPC: Make rmw_lock a raw_spin_lock The following BUG was triggered: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.12.0-rc2-XXX #406 Not tainted ----------------------------- kworker/1:1/62 is trying to lock: ffffff8801593030 (\u0026amp;cpc_ptr-\u0026gt;rmw_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpc_write+0xcc/0x370 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 2 locks held by kworker/1:1/62: #0: ffffff897ef5ec98 (\u0026amp;rq-\u0026gt;__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2c/0x50 #1: ffffff880154e238 (\u0026amp;sg_policy-\u0026gt;update_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: sugov_update_shared+0x3c/0x280 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 62 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-g9654bd3e8806 #406 Workqueue: 0x0 (events) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0xa4/0x130 show_stack+0x20/0x38 dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0xd0 dump_stack+0x18/0x28 __lock_acquire+0x480/0x1ad8 lock_acquire+0x114/0x310 _raw_spin_lock+0x50/0x70 cpc_write+0xcc/0x370 cppc_set_perf+0xa0/0x3a8 cppc_cpufreq_fast_switch+0x40/0xc0 cpufreq_driver_fast_switch+0x4c/0x218 sugov_update_shared+0x234/0x280 update_load_avg+0x6ec/0x7b8 dequeue_entities+0x108/0x830 dequeue_task_fair+0x58/0x408 __schedule+0x4f0/0x1070 schedule+0x54/0x130 worker_thread+0xc0/0x2e8 kthread+0x130/0x148 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 sugov_update_shared() locks a raw_spinlock while cpc_write() locks a spinlock. To have a correct wait-type order, update rmw_lock to a raw spinlock and ensure that interrupts will be disabled on the CPU holding it. [ rjw: Changelog edits ](CVE-2024-50249)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: Fix use-after-free in get_info() ip6table_nat module unload has refcnt warning for UAF. call trace is: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 379 at kernel/module/main.c:853 module_put+0x6f/0x80 Modules linked in: ip6table_nat(-) CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 379 Comm: ip6tables Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-00047-gc2ee9f594da8-dirty #205 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:module_put+0x6f/0x80 Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; get_info+0x128/0x180 do_ip6t_get_ctl+0x6a/0x430 nf_getsockopt+0x46/0x80 ipv6_getsockopt+0xb9/0x100 rawv6_getsockopt+0x42/0x190 do_sock_getsockopt+0xaa/0x180 __sys_getsockopt+0x70/0xc0 __x64_sys_getsockopt+0x20/0x30 do_syscall_64+0xa2/0x1a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Concurrent execution of module unload and get_info() trigered the warning. The root cause is as follows: cpu0 cpu1 module_exit //mod-\u0026gt;state = MODULE_STATE_GOING ip6table_nat_exit xt_unregister_template kfree(t) //removed from templ_list getinfo() t = xt_find_table_lock list_for_each_entry(tmpl, \u0026amp;xt_templates[af]...) if (strcmp(tmpl-\u0026gt;name, name)) continue; //table not found try_module_get list_for_each_entry(t, \u0026amp;xt_net-\u0026gt;tables[af]...) return t; //not get refcnt module_put(t-\u0026gt;me) //uaf unregister_pernet_subsys //remove table from xt_net list While xt_table module was going away and has been removed from xt_templates list, we couldnt get refcnt of xt_table-\u0026gt;me. Check module in xt_net-\u0026gt;tables list re-traversal to fix it.(CVE-2024-50257)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fork: only invoke khugepaged, ksm hooks if no error There is no reason to invoke these hooks early against an mm that is in an incomplete state. The change in commit d24062914837 (\u0026quot;fork: use __mt_dup() to duplicate maple tree in dup_mmap()\u0026quot;) makes this more pertinent as we may be in a state where entries in the maple tree are not yet consistent. Their placement early in dup_mmap() only appears to have been meaningful for early error checking, and since functionally it\u0026apos;d require a very small allocation to fail (in practice \u0026apos;too small to fail\u0026apos;) that\u0026apos;d only occur in the most dire circumstances, meaning the fork would fail or be OOM\u0026apos;d in any case. Since both khugepaged and KSM tracking are there to provide optimisations to memory performance rather than critical functionality, it doesn\u0026apos;t really matter all that much if, under such dire memory pressure, we fail to register an mm with these. As a result, we follow the example of commit d2081b2bf819 (\u0026quot;mm: khugepaged: make khugepaged_enter() void function\u0026quot;) and make ksm_fork() a void function also. We only expose the mm to these functions once we are done with them and only if no error occurred in the fork operation.(CVE-2024-50263)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: USB: serial: io_edgeport: fix use after free in debug printk The \u0026quot;dev_dbg(\u0026amp;urb-\u0026gt;dev-\u0026gt;dev, ...\u0026quot; which happens after usb_free_urb(urb) is a use after free of the \u0026quot;urb\u0026quot; pointer. Store the \u0026quot;dev\u0026quot; pointer at the start of the function to avoid this issue.(CVE-2024-50267)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd() The \u0026quot;*cmd\u0026quot; variable can be controlled by the user via debugfs. That means \u0026quot;new_cam\u0026quot; can be as high as 255 while the size of the uc-\u0026gt;updated[] array is UCSI_MAX_ALTMODES (30). The call tree is: ucsi_cmd() // val comes from simple_attr_write_xsigned() -\u0026gt; ucsi_send_command() -\u0026gt; ucsi_send_command_common() -\u0026gt; ucsi_run_command() // calls ucsi-\u0026gt;ops-\u0026gt;sync_control() -\u0026gt; ucsi_ccg_sync_control()(CVE-2024-50268)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm cache: fix out-of-bounds access to the dirty bitset when resizing dm-cache checks the dirty bits of the cache blocks to be dropped when shrinking the fast device, but an index bug in bitset iteration causes out-of-bounds access. Reproduce steps: 1. create a cache device of 1024 cache blocks (128 bytes dirty bitset) dmsetup create cmeta --table \u0026quot;0 8192 linear /dev/sdc 0\u0026quot; dmsetup create cdata --table \u0026quot;0 131072 linear /dev/sdc 8192\u0026quot; dmsetup create corig --table \u0026quot;0 524288 linear /dev/sdc 262144\u0026quot; dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/mapper/cmeta bs=4k count=1 oflag=direct dmsetup create cache --table \u0026quot;0 524288 cache /dev/mapper/cmeta \\ /dev/mapper/cdata /dev/mapper/corig 128 2 metadata2 writethrough smq 0\u0026quot; 2. shrink the fast device to 512 cache blocks, triggering out-of-bounds access to the dirty bitset (offset 0x80) dmsetup suspend cache dmsetup reload cdata --table \u0026quot;0 65536 linear /dev/sdc 8192\u0026quot; dmsetup resume cdata dmsetup resume cache KASAN reports: BUG: KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in cache_preresume+0x269/0x7b0 Read of size 8 at addr ffffc900000f3080 by task dmsetup/131 (...snip...) The buggy address belongs to the virtual mapping at [ffffc900000f3000, ffffc900000f5000) created by: cache_ctr+0x176a/0x35f0 (...snip...) Memory state around the buggy address: ffffc900000f2f80: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 ffffc900000f3000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 \u0026gt;ffffc900000f3080: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 ^ ffffc900000f3100: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 ffffc900000f3180: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 Fix by making the index post-incremented.(CVE-2024-50279)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: v4l2-tpg: prevent the risk of a division by zero As reported by Coverity, the logic at tpg_precalculate_line() blindly rescales the buffer even when scaled_witdh is equal to zero. If this ever happens, this will cause a division by zero. Instead, add a WARN_ON_ONCE() to trigger such cases and return without doing any precalculation.(CVE-2024-50287)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: cx24116: prevent overflows on SNR calculus as reported by Coverity, if reading SNR registers fail, a negative number will be returned, causing an underflow when reading SNR registers. Prevent that.(CVE-2024-50290)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ASoC: stm32: spdifrx: fix dma channel release in stm32_spdifrx_remove In case of error when requesting ctrl_chan DMA channel, ctrl_chan is not null. So the release of the dma channel leads to the following issue: [ 4.879000] st,stm32-spdifrx 500d0000.audio-controller: dma_request_slave_channel error -19 [ 4.888975] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000000000000003d [...] [ 5.096577] Call trace: [ 5.099099] dma_release_channel+0x24/0x100 [ 5.103235] stm32_spdifrx_remove+0x24/0x60 [snd_soc_stm32_spdifrx] [ 5.109494] stm32_spdifrx_probe+0x320/0x4c4 [snd_soc_stm32_spdifrx] To avoid this issue, release channel only if the pointer is valid.(CVE-2024-50292)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: security/keys: fix slab-out-of-bounds in key_task_permission KASAN reports an out of bounds read: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in __kuid_val include/linux/uidgid.h:36 BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in uid_eq include/linux/uidgid.h:63 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in key_task_permission+0x394/0x410 security/keys/permission.c:54 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88813c3ab618 by task stress-ng/4362 CPU: 2 PID: 4362 Comm: stress-ng Not tainted 5.10.0-14930-gafbffd6c3ede #15 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:82 [inline] dump_stack+0x107/0x167 lib/dump_stack.c:123 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x19/0x170 mm/kasan/report.c:400 __kasan_report.cold+0x6c/0x84 mm/kasan/report.c:560 kasan_report+0x3a/0x50 mm/kasan/report.c:585 __kuid_val include/linux/uidgid.h:36 [inline] uid_eq include/linux/uidgid.h:63 [inline] key_task_permission+0x394/0x410 security/keys/permission.c:54 search_nested_keyrings+0x90e/0xe90 security/keys/keyring.c:793 This issue was also reported by syzbot. It can be reproduced by following these steps(more details [1]): 1. Obtain more than 32 inputs that have similar hashes, which ends with the pattern \u0026apos;0xxxxxxxe6\u0026apos;. 2. Reboot and add the keys obtained in step 1. The reproducer demonstrates how this issue happened: 1. In the search_nested_keyrings function, when it iterates through the slots in a node(below tag ascend_to_node), if the slot pointer is meta and node-\u0026gt;back_pointer != NULL(it means a root), it will proceed to descend_to_node. However, there is an exception. If node is the root, and one of the slots points to a shortcut, it will be treated as a keyring. 2. Whether the ptr is keyring decided by keyring_ptr_is_keyring function. However, KEYRING_PTR_SUBTYPE is 0x2UL, the same as ASSOC_ARRAY_PTR_SUBTYPE_MASK. 3. When 32 keys with the similar hashes are added to the tree, the ROOT has keys with hashes that are not similar (e.g. slot 0) and it splits NODE A without using a shortcut. When NODE A is filled with keys that all hashes are xxe6, the keys are similar, NODE A will split with a shortcut. Finally, it forms the tree as shown below, where slot 6 points to a shortcut. NODE A +------\u0026gt;+---+ ROOT | | 0 | xxe6 +---+ | +---+ xxxx | 0 | shortcut : : xxe6 +---+ | +---+ xxe6 : : | | | xxe6 +---+ | +---+ | 6 |---+ : : xxe6 +---+ +---+ xxe6 : : | f | xxe6 +---+ +---+ xxe6 | f | +---+ 4. As mentioned above, If a slot(slot 6) of the root points to a shortcut, it may be mistakenly transferred to a key*, leading to a read out-of-bounds read. To fix this issue, one should jump to descend_to_node if the ptr is a shortcut, regardless of whether the node is root or not. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/1cfa878e-8c7b-4570-8606-21daf5e13ce7@huaweicloud.com/ [jarkko: tweaked the commit message a bit to have an appropriate closes tag.](CVE-2024-50301)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: HID: core: zero-initialize the report buffer Since the report buffer is used by all kinds of drivers in various ways, let\u0026apos;s zero-initialize it during allocation to make sure that it can\u0026apos;t be ever used to leak kernel memory via specially-crafted report.(CVE-2024-50302)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: stop qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog on TC_H_ROOT In qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog, Qdiscs with major handle ffff: are assumed to be either root or ingress. This assumption is bogus since it\u0026apos;s valid to create egress qdiscs with major handle ffff: Budimir Markovic found that for qdiscs like DRR that maintain an active class list, it will cause a UAF with a dangling class pointer. In 066a3b5b2346, the concern was to avoid iterating over the ingress qdisc since its parent is itself. The proper fix is to stop when parent TC_H_ROOT is reached because the only way to retrieve ingress is when a hierarchy which does not contain a ffff: major handle call into qdisc_lookup with TC_H_MAJ(TC_H_ROOT). In the scenario where major ffff: is an egress qdisc in any of the tree levels, the updates will also propagate to TC_H_ROOT, which then the iteration must stop. net/sched/sch_api.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)(CVE-2024-53057)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: firmware: arm_scmi: Fix slab-use-after-free in scmi_bus_notifier() The scmi_dev-\u0026gt;name is released prematurely in __scmi_device_destroy(), which causes slab-use-after-free when accessing scmi_dev-\u0026gt;name in scmi_bus_notifier(). So move the release of scmi_dev-\u0026gt;name to scmi_device_release() to avoid slab-use-after-free. | BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in strncmp+0xe4/0xec | Read of size 1 at addr ffffff80a482bcc0 by task swapper/0/1 | | CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.6.38-debug #1 | Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SA8775P Ride (DT) | Call trace: | dump_backtrace+0x94/0x114 | show_stack+0x18/0x24 | dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x60 | print_report+0xf4/0x5b0 | kasan_report+0xa4/0xec | __asan_report_load1_noabort+0x20/0x2c | strncmp+0xe4/0xec | scmi_bus_notifier+0x5c/0x54c | notifier_call_chain+0xb4/0x31c | blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x68/0x9c | bus_notify+0x54/0x78 | device_del+0x1bc/0x840 | device_unregister+0x20/0xb4 | __scmi_device_destroy+0xac/0x280 | scmi_device_destroy+0x94/0xd0 | scmi_chan_setup+0x524/0x750 | scmi_probe+0x7fc/0x1508 | platform_probe+0xc4/0x19c | really_probe+0x32c/0x99c | __driver_probe_device+0x15c/0x3c4 | driver_probe_device+0x5c/0x170 | __driver_attach+0x1c8/0x440 | bus_for_each_dev+0xf4/0x178 | driver_attach+0x3c/0x58 | bus_add_driver+0x234/0x4d4 | driver_register+0xf4/0x3c0 | __platform_driver_register+0x60/0x88 | scmi_driver_init+0xb0/0x104 | do_one_initcall+0xb4/0x664 | kernel_init_freeable+0x3c8/0x894 | kernel_init+0x24/0x1e8 | ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 | | Allocated by task 1: | kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x54 | kasan_set_track+0x2c/0x40 | kasan_save_alloc_info+0x24/0x34 | __kasan_kmalloc+0xa0/0xb8 | __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x6c/0x104 | kstrdup+0x48/0x84 | kstrdup_const+0x34/0x40 | __scmi_device_create.part.0+0x8c/0x408 | scmi_device_create+0x104/0x370 | scmi_chan_setup+0x2a0/0x750 | scmi_probe+0x7fc/0x1508 | platform_probe+0xc4/0x19c | really_probe+0x32c/0x99c | __driver_probe_device+0x15c/0x3c4 | driver_probe_device+0x5c/0x170 | __driver_attach+0x1c8/0x440 | bus_for_each_dev+0xf4/0x178 | driver_attach+0x3c/0x58 | bus_add_driver+0x234/0x4d4 | driver_register+0xf4/0x3c0 | __platform_driver_register+0x60/0x88 | scmi_driver_init+0xb0/0x104 | do_one_initcall+0xb4/0x664 | kernel_init_freeable+0x3c8/0x894 | kernel_init+0x24/0x1e8 | ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 | | Freed by task 1: | kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x54 | kasan_set_track+0x2c/0x40 | kasan_save_free_info+0x38/0x5c | __kasan_slab_free+0xe8/0x164 | __kmem_cache_free+0x11c/0x230 | kfree+0x70/0x130 | kfree_const+0x20/0x40 | __scmi_device_destroy+0x70/0x280 | scmi_device_destroy+0x94/0xd0 | scmi_chan_setup+0x524/0x750 | scmi_probe+0x7fc/0x1508 | platform_probe+0xc4/0x19c | really_probe+0x32c/0x99c | __driver_probe_device+0x15c/0x3c4 | driver_probe_device+0x5c/0x170 | __driver_attach+0x1c8/0x440 | bus_for_each_dev+0xf4/0x178 | driver_attach+0x3c/0x58 | bus_add_driver+0x234/0x4d4 | driver_register+0xf4/0x3c0 | __platform_driver_register+0x60/0x88 | scmi_driver_init+0xb0/0x104 | do_one_initcall+0xb4/0x664 | kernel_init_freeable+0x3c8/0x894 | kernel_init+0x24/0x1e8 | ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20(CVE-2024-53068)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: platform/x86/amd/pmc: Detect when STB is not available Loading the amd_pmc module as: amd_pmc enable_stb=1 ...can result in the following messages in the kernel ring buffer: amd_pmc AMDI0009:00: SMU cmd failed. err: 0xff ioremap on RAM at 0x0000000000000000 - 0x0000000000ffffff WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 2151 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:217 __ioremap_caller+0x2cd/0x340 Further debugging reveals that this occurs when the requests for S2D_PHYS_ADDR_LOW and S2D_PHYS_ADDR_HIGH return a value of 0, indicating that the STB is inaccessible. To prevent the ioremap warning and provide clarity to the user, handle the invalid address and display an error message.(CVE-2024-53072)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: virtio_net: Add hash_key_length check Add hash_key_length check in virtnet_probe() to avoid possible out of bound errors when setting/reading the hash key.(CVE-2024-53082)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: uvcvideo: Skip parsing frames of type UVC_VS_UNDEFINED in uvc_parse_format This can lead to out of bounds writes since frames of this type were not taken into account when calculating the size of the frames buffer in uvc_parse_streaming.(CVE-2024-53104)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vp_vdpa: fix id_table array not null terminated error Allocate one extra virtio_device_id as null terminator, otherwise vdpa_mgmtdev_get_classes() may iterate multiple times and visit undefined memory.(CVE-2024-53110)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: uncache inode which has failed entering the group Syzbot has reported the following BUG: kernel BUG at fs/ocfs2/uptodate.c:509! ... Call Trace: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt; ? __die_body+0x5f/0xb0 ? die+0x9e/0xc0 ? do_trap+0x15a/0x3a0 ? ocfs2_set_new_buffer_uptodate+0x145/0x160 ? do_error_trap+0x1dc/0x2c0 ? ocfs2_set_new_buffer_uptodate+0x145/0x160 ? __pfx_do_error_trap+0x10/0x10 ? handle_invalid_op+0x34/0x40 ? ocfs2_set_new_buffer_uptodate+0x145/0x160 ? exc_invalid_op+0x38/0x50 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? ocfs2_set_new_buffer_uptodate+0x2e/0x160 ? ocfs2_set_new_buffer_uptodate+0x144/0x160 ? ocfs2_set_new_buffer_uptodate+0x145/0x160 ocfs2_group_add+0x39f/0x15a0 ? __pfx_ocfs2_group_add+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? mnt_get_write_access+0x68/0x2b0 ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 ? rcu_read_lock_any_held+0xb7/0x160 ? __pfx_rcu_read_lock_any_held+0x10/0x10 ? smack_log+0x123/0x540 ? mnt_get_write_access+0x68/0x2b0 ? mnt_get_write_access+0x68/0x2b0 ? mnt_get_write_access+0x226/0x2b0 ocfs2_ioctl+0x65e/0x7d0 ? __pfx_ocfs2_ioctl+0x10/0x10 ? smack_file_ioctl+0x29e/0x3a0 ? __pfx_smack_file_ioctl+0x10/0x10 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x43d/0x780 ? __pfx_lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_ocfs2_ioctl+0x10/0x10 __se_sys_ioctl+0xfb/0x170 do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f ... \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt; When \u0026apos;ioctl(OCFS2_IOC_GROUP_ADD, ...)\u0026apos; has failed for the particular inode in \u0026apos;ocfs2_verify_group_and_input()\u0026apos;, corresponding buffer head remains cached and subsequent call to the same \u0026apos;ioctl()\u0026apos; for the same inode issues the BUG() in \u0026apos;ocfs2_set_new_buffer_uptodate()\u0026apos; (trying to cache the same buffer head of that inode). Fix this by uncaching the buffer head with \u0026apos;ocfs2_remove_from_cache()\u0026apos; on error path in \u0026apos;ocfs2_group_add()\u0026apos;.(CVE-2024-53112)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: sync_linked_regs() must preserve subreg_def Range propagation must not affect subreg_def marks, otherwise the following example is rewritten by verifier incorrectly when BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 flag is set: 0: call bpf_ktime_get_ns call bpf_ktime_get_ns 1: r0 \u0026amp;= 0x7fffffff after verifier r0 \u0026amp;= 0x7fffffff 2: w1 = w0 rewrites w1 = w0 3: if w0 \u0026lt; 10 goto +0 --------------\u0026gt; r11 = 0x2f5674a6 (r) 4: r1 \u0026gt;\u0026gt;= 32 r11 \u0026lt;\u0026lt;= 32 (r) 5: r0 = r1 r1 |= r11 (r) 6: exit; if w0 \u0026lt; 0xa goto pc+0 r1 \u0026gt;\u0026gt;= 32 r0 = r1 exit (or zero extension of w1 at (2) is missing for architectures that require zero extension for upper register half). The following happens w/o this patch: - r0 is marked as not a subreg at (0); - w1 is marked as subreg at (2); - w1 subreg_def is overridden at (3) by copy_register_state(); - w1 is read at (5) but mark_insn_zext() does not mark (2) for zero extension, because w1 subreg_def is not set; - because of BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 flag verifier inserts random value for hi32 bits of (2) (marked (r)); - this random value is read at (5).(CVE-2024-53125)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nilfs2: fix null-ptr-deref in block_dirty_buffer tracepoint When using the \u0026quot;block:block_dirty_buffer\u0026quot; tracepoint, mark_buffer_dirty() may cause a NULL pointer dereference, or a general protection fault when KASAN is enabled. This happens because, since the tracepoint was added in mark_buffer_dirty(), it references the dev_t member bh-\u0026gt;b_bdev-\u0026gt;bd_dev regardless of whether the buffer head has a pointer to a block_device structure. In the current implementation, nilfs_grab_buffer(), which grabs a buffer to read (or create) a block of metadata, including b-tree node blocks, does not set the block device, but instead does so only if the buffer is not in the \u0026quot;uptodate\u0026quot; state for each of its caller block reading functions. However, if the uptodate flag is set on a folio/page, and the buffer heads are detached from it by try_to_free_buffers(), and new buffer heads are then attached by create_empty_buffers(), the uptodate flag may be restored to each buffer without the block device being set to bh-\u0026gt;b_bdev, and mark_buffer_dirty() may be called later in that state, resulting in the bug mentioned above. Fix this issue by making nilfs_grab_buffer() always set the block device of the super block structure to the buffer head, regardless of the state of the buffer\u0026apos;s uptodate flag.(CVE-2024-53130)",
"id": "OESA-2024-2537",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:08:01Z",
"published": "2024-12-13T11:08:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2537"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40927"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47697"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47713"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47738"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49897"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49923"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49977"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49991"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49997"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50103"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50112"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50116"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50117"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50134"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50159"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50194"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50200"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50210"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50224"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50239"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50249"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50257"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50263"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50267"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50268"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50279"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50287"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50290"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50292"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50301"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50302"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53057"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53068"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53072"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53082"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53104"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53110"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53112"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53125"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53130"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2024-40927",
"CVE-2024-47697",
"CVE-2024-47713",
"CVE-2024-47738",
"CVE-2024-49897",
"CVE-2024-49923",
"CVE-2024-49977",
"CVE-2024-49991",
"CVE-2024-49997",
"CVE-2024-50103",
"CVE-2024-50112",
"CVE-2024-50116",
"CVE-2024-50117",
"CVE-2024-50134",
"CVE-2024-50159",
"CVE-2024-50194",
"CVE-2024-50200",
"CVE-2024-50210",
"CVE-2024-50224",
"CVE-2024-50239",
"CVE-2024-50249",
"CVE-2024-50257",
"CVE-2024-50263",
"CVE-2024-50267",
"CVE-2024-50268",
"CVE-2024-50279",
"CVE-2024-50287",
"CVE-2024-50290",
"CVE-2024-50292",
"CVE-2024-50301",
"CVE-2024-50302",
"CVE-2024-53057",
"CVE-2024-53068",
"CVE-2024-53072",
"CVE-2024-53082",
"CVE-2024-53104",
"CVE-2024-53110",
"CVE-2024-53112",
"CVE-2024-53125",
"CVE-2024-53130"
]
}
OESA-2025-1158 (CVE-2024-46782)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2025-02-21 11:08 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:08 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner
syzbot found an use-after-free Read in ila_nf_input [1]
Issue here is that ila_xlat_exit_net() frees the rhashtable, then call nf_unregister_net_hooks().
It should be done in the reverse way, with a synchronize_rcu().
This is a good match for a pre_exit() method.
[1] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888064620008 by task ksoftirqd/0/16
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00238-g2ad6d23f465a #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline] rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline] rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:132 [inline] ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline] ila_nf_input+0x1fe/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:190 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline] NF_HOOK+0x29e/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:312 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775 process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108 __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline] net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963 handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554 run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:928 smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 </TASK>
The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x64620 flags: 0xfff00000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff) page_type: 0xbfffffff(buddy) raw: 00fff00000000000 ffffea0000959608 ffffea00019d9408 0000000000000000 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 00000000bfffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected page_owner tracks the page as freed page last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x52dc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), pid 5242, tgid 5242 (syz-executor), ts 73611328570, free_ts 618981657187 set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [inline] post_alloc_hook+0x1f3/0x230 mm/page_alloc.c:1493 prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1501 [inline] get_page_from_freelist+0x2e4c/0x2f10 mm/page_alloc.c:3439 __alloc_pages_noprof+0x256/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4695 __alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:269 [inline] alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:296 [inline] kmalloclarge_node+0x8b/0x1d0 mm/slub.c:4103 kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x1a/0x80 mm/slub.c:4130 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4146 [inline] __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x2d2/0x440 mm/slub.c:4164 __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:650 bucket_table_alloc lib/rhashtable.c:186 [inline] rhashtable_init_noprof+0x534/0xa60 lib/rhashtable.c:1071 ila_xlat_init_net+0xa0/0x110 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:613 ops_ini ---truncated---(CVE-2024-46782)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drivers: media: dvb-frontends/rtl2830: fix an out-of-bounds write error
Ensure index in rtl2830_pid_filter does not exceed 31 to prevent out-of-bounds access.
dev->filters is a 32-bit value, so set_bit and clear_bit functions should only operate on indices from 0 to 31. If index is 32, it will attempt to access a non-existent 33rd bit, leading to out-of-bounds access. Change the boundary check from index > 32 to index >= 32 to resolve this issue.(CVE-2024-47697)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvme-rdma: unquiesce admin_q before destroy it
Kernel will hang on destroy admin_q while we create ctrl failed, such as following calltrace:
PID: 23644 TASK: ff2d52b40f439fc0 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "nvme" #0 [ff61d23de260fb78] __schedule at ffffffff8323bc15 #1 [ff61d23de260fc08] schedule at ffffffff8323c014 #2 [ff61d23de260fc28] blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait at ffffffff82a3dba1 #3 [ff61d23de260fc78] blk_freeze_queue at ffffffff82a4113a #4 [ff61d23de260fc90] blk_cleanup_queue at ffffffff82a33006 #5 [ff61d23de260fcb0] nvme_rdma_destroy_admin_queue at ffffffffc12686ce #6 [ff61d23de260fcc8] nvme_rdma_setup_ctrl at ffffffffc1268ced #7 [ff61d23de260fd28] nvme_rdma_create_ctrl at ffffffffc126919b #8 [ff61d23de260fd68] nvmf_dev_write at ffffffffc024f362 #9 [ff61d23de260fe38] vfs_write at ffffffff827d5f25 RIP: 00007fda7891d574 RSP: 00007ffe2ef06958 RFLAGS: 00000202 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055e8122a4d90 RCX: 00007fda7891d574 RDX: 000000000000012b RSI: 000055e8122a4d90 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 00007ffe2ef079c0 R8: 000000000000012b R9: 000055e8122a4d90 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000004 R13: 000055e8122923c0 R14: 000000000000012b R15: 00007fda78a54500 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 CS: 0033 SS: 002b
This due to we have quiesced admi_q before cancel requests, but forgot to unquiesce before destroy it, as a result we fail to drain the pending requests, and hang on blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() forever. Here try to reuse nvme_rdma_teardown_admin_queue() to fix this issue and simplify the code.(CVE-2024-49569)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix UAF on sco_sock_timeout
conn->sk maybe have been unlinked/freed while waiting for sco_conn_lock so this checks if the conn->sk is still valid by checking if it part of sco_sk_list.(CVE-2024-50125)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd()
The "*cmd" variable can be controlled by the user via debugfs. That means "new_cam" can be as high as 255 while the size of the uc->updated[] array is UCSI_MAX_ALTMODES (30).
The call tree is: ucsi_cmd() // val comes from simple_attr_write_xsigned() -> ucsi_send_command() -> ucsi_send_command_common() -> ucsi_run_command() // calls ucsi->ops->sync_control() -> ucsi_ccg_sync_control()(CVE-2024-50268)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/sched: stop qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog on TC_H_ROOT
In qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog, Qdiscs with major handle ffff: are assumed to be either root or ingress. This assumption is bogus since it's valid to create egress qdiscs with major handle ffff: Budimir Markovic found that for qdiscs like DRR that maintain an active class list, it will cause a UAF with a dangling class pointer.
In 066a3b5b2346, the concern was to avoid iterating over the ingress qdisc since its parent is itself. The proper fix is to stop when parent TC_H_ROOT is reached because the only way to retrieve ingress is when a hierarchy which does not contain a ffff: major handle call into qdisc_lookup with TC_H_MAJ(TC_H_ROOT).
In the scenario where major ffff: is an egress qdisc in any of the tree levels, the updates will also propagate to TC_H_ROOT, which then the iteration must stop.
net/sched/sch_api.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)(CVE-2024-53057)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm: resolve faulty mmap_region() error path behaviour
The mmap_region() function is somewhat terrifying, with spaghetti-like control flow and numerous means by which issues can arise and incomplete state, memory leaks and other unpleasantness can occur.
A large amount of the complexity arises from trying to handle errors late in the process of mapping a VMA, which forms the basis of recently observed issues with resource leaks and observable inconsistent state.
Taking advantage of previous patches in this series we move a number of checks earlier in the code, simplifying things by moving the core of the logic into a static internal function __mmap_region().
Doing this allows us to perform a number of checks up front before we do any real work, and allows us to unwind the writable unmap check unconditionally as required and to perform a CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_MAPLE_TREE validation unconditionally also.
We move a number of things here:
-
We preallocate memory for the iterator before we call the file-backed memory hook, allowing us to exit early and avoid having to perform complicated and error-prone close/free logic. We carefully free iterator state on both success and error paths.
-
The enclosing mmap_region() function handles the mapping_map_writable() logic early. Previously the logic had the mapping_map_writable() at the point of mapping a newly allocated file-backed VMA, and a matching mapping_unmap_writable() on success and error paths.
We now do this unconditionally if this is a file-backed, shared writable mapping. If a driver changes the flags to eliminate VM_MAYWRITE, however doing so does not invalidate the seal check we just performed, and we in any case always decrement the counter in the wrapper.
We perform a debug assert to ensure a driver does not attempt to do the opposite.
- We also move arch_validate_flags() up into the mmap_region() function. This is only relevant on arm64 and sparc64, and the check is only meaningful for SPARC with ADI enabled. We explicitly add a warning for this arch if a driver invalidates this check, though the code ought eventually to be fixed to eliminate the need for this.
With all of these measures in place, we no longer need to explicitly close the VMA on error paths, as we place all checks which might fail prior to a call to any driver mmap hook.
This eliminates an entire class of errors, makes the code easier to reason about and more robust.(CVE-2024-53096)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: ipset: add missing range check in bitmap_ip_uadt
When tb[IPSET_ATTR_IP_TO] is not present but tb[IPSET_ATTR_CIDR] exists, the values of ip and ip_to are slightly swapped. Therefore, the range check for ip should be done later, but this part is missing and it seems that the vulnerability occurs.
So we should add missing range checks and remove unnecessary range checks.(CVE-2024-53141)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
comedi: Flush partial mappings in error case
If some remap_pfn_range() calls succeeded before one failed, we still have buffer pages mapped into the userspace page tables when we drop the buffer reference with comedi_buf_map_put(bm). The userspace mappings are only cleaned up later in the mmap error path.
Fix it by explicitly flushing all mappings in our VMA on the error path.
See commit 79a61cc3fc04 ("mm: avoid leaving partial pfn mappings around in error case").(CVE-2024-53148)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: ath9k: add range check for conn_rsp_epid in htc_connect_service()
I found the following bug in my fuzzer:
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_hst.c:26:51 index 255 is out of range for type 'htc_endpoint [22]' CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-dirty #14 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x180/0x1b0 __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xd4/0x130 htc_issue_send.constprop.0+0x20c/0x230 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x70 ath9k_wmi_cmd+0x41d/0x610 ? mark_held_locks+0x9f/0xe0 ...
Since this bug has been confirmed to be caused by insufficient verification of conn_rsp_epid, I think it would be appropriate to add a range check for conn_rsp_epid to htc_connect_service() to prevent the bug from occurring.(CVE-2024-53156)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: inet6: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in inet6_create()
sock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk pointer to the provided sock object. If inet6_create() fails later, the sk object is released, but the sock object retains the dangling sk pointer, which may cause use-after-free later.
Clear the sock sk pointer on error.(CVE-2024-56600)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: inet: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in inet_create()
sock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk object to the provided sock object. If inet_create() fails later, the sk object is freed, but the sock object retains the dangling pointer, which may create use-after-free later.
Clear the sk pointer in the sock object on error.(CVE-2024-56601)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gpio: grgpio: Add NULL check in grgpio_probe
devm_kasprintf() can return a NULL pointer on failure,but this returned value in grgpio_probe is not checked. Add NULL check in grgpio_probe, to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference error.(CVE-2024-56634)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/cpum_sf: Handle CPU hotplug remove during sampling
CPU hotplug remove handling triggers the following function call sequence:
CPUHP_AP_PERF_S390_SF_ONLINE --> s390_pmu_sf_offline_cpu() ... CPUHP_AP_PERF_ONLINE --> perf_event_exit_cpu()
The s390 CPUMF sampling CPU hotplug handler invokes:
s390_pmu_sf_offline_cpu() +--> cpusf_pmu_setup() +--> setup_pmc_cpu() +--> deallocate_buffers()
This function de-allocates all sampling data buffers (SDBs) allocated for that CPU at event initialization. It also clears the PMU_F_RESERVED bit. The CPU is gone and can not be sampled.
With the event still being active on the removed CPU, the CPU event hotplug support in kernel performance subsystem triggers the following function calls on the removed CPU:
perf_event_exit_cpu() +--> perf_event_exit_cpu_context() +--> __perf_event_exit_context() +--> __perf_remove_from_context() +--> event_sched_out() +--> cpumsf_pmu_del() +--> cpumsf_pmu_stop() +--> hw_perf_event_update()
to stop and remove the event. During removal of the event, the sampling device driver tries to read out the remaining samples from the sample data buffers (SDBs). But they have already been freed (and may have been re-assigned). This may lead to a use after free situation in which case the samples are most likely invalid. In the best case the memory has not been reassigned and still contains valid data.
Remedy this situation and check if the CPU is still in reserved state (bit PMU_F_RESERVED set). In this case the SDBs have not been released an contain valid data. This is always the case when the event is removed (and no CPU hotplug off occured). If the PMU_F_RESERVED bit is not set, the SDB buffers are gone.(CVE-2024-57849)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ila: serialize calls to nf_register_net_hooks()
syzbot found a race in ila_add_mapping() [1]
commit 031ae72825ce ("ila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner") attempted to fix a similar issue.
Looking at the syzbot repro, we have concurrent ILA_CMD_ADD commands.
Add a mutex to make sure at most one thread is calling nf_register_net_hooks().
[1] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup.constprop.0+0x426/0x550 include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888028f40008 by task dhcpcd/5501
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 5501 Comm: dhcpcd Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-syzkaller-00054-gd6ef8b40d075 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline] print_report+0xc3/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:489 kasan_report+0xd9/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:602 rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] __rhashtable_lookup.constprop.0+0x426/0x550 include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline] rhashtable_lookup_fast include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 [inline] ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:127 [inline] ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline] ila_nf_input+0x1ee/0x620 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:185 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xbb/0x200 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook.constprop.0+0x42e/0x750 include/linux/netfilter.h:269 NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:312 [inline] ipv6_rcv+0xa4/0x680 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:309 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x12e/0x1e0 net/core/dev.c:5672 __netif_receive_skb+0x1d/0x160 net/core/dev.c:5785 process_backlog+0x443/0x15f0 net/core/dev.c:6117 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xb7/0x550 net/core/dev.c:6883 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6952 [inline] net_rx_action+0xa94/0x1010 net/core/dev.c:7074 handle_softirqs+0x213/0x8f0 kernel/softirq.c:561 __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:595 [inline] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:435 [inline] __irq_exit_rcu+0x109/0x170 kernel/softirq.c:662 irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:678 instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 [inline] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa4/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049(CVE-2024-57900)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched: sch_cake: add bounds checks to host bulk flow fairness counts
Even though we fixed a logic error in the commit cited below, syzbot still managed to trigger an underflow of the per-host bulk flow counters, leading to an out of bounds memory access.
To avoid any such logic errors causing out of bounds memory accesses, this commit factors out all accesses to the per-host bulk flow counters to a series of helpers that perform bounds-checking before any increments and decrements. This also has the benefit of improving readability by moving the conditional checks for the flow mode into these helpers, instead of having them spread out throughout the code (which was the cause of the original logic error).
As part of this change, the flow quantum calculation is consolidated into a helper function, which means that the dithering applied to the ost load scaling is now applied both in the DRR rotation and when a sparse flow's quantum is first initiated. The only user-visible effect of this is that the maximum packet size that can be sent while a flow stays sparse will now vary with +/- one byte in some cases. This should not make a noticeable difference in practice, and thus it's not worth complicating the code to preserve the old behaviour.(CVE-2025-21647)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: conntrack: clamp maximum hashtable size to INT_MAX
Use INT_MAX as maximum size for the conntrack hashtable. Otherwise, it is possible to hit WARN_ON_ONCE in __kvmalloc_node_noprof() when resizing hashtable because __GFP_NOWARN is unset. See:
0708a0afe291 ("mm: Consider __GFP_NOWARN flag for oversized kvmalloc() calls")
Note: hashtable resize is only possible from init_netns.(CVE-2025-21648)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iomap: avoid avoid truncating 64-bit offset to 32 bits
on 32-bit kernels, iomap_write_delalloc_scan() was inadvertently using a 32-bit position due to folio_next_index() returning an unsigned long. This could lead to an infinite loop when writing to an xfs filesystem.(CVE-2025-21667)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-250.0.0.154.oe2203sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner\n\nsyzbot found an use-after-free Read in ila_nf_input [1]\n\nIssue here is that ila_xlat_exit_net() frees the rhashtable,\nthen call nf_unregister_net_hooks().\n\nIt should be done in the reverse way, with a synchronize_rcu().\n\nThis is a good match for a pre_exit() method.\n\n[1]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff888064620008 by task ksoftirqd/0/16\n\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00238-g2ad6d23f465a #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\n ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:132 [inline]\n ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline]\n ila_nf_input+0x1fe/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:190\n nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline]\n nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626\n nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline]\n NF_HOOK+0x29e/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:312\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775\n process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108\n __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772\n napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]\n net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963\n handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554\n run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:928\n smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164\n kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389\n ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\nThe buggy address belongs to the physical page:\npage: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x64620\nflags: 0xfff00000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff)\npage_type: 0xbfffffff(buddy)\nraw: 00fff00000000000 ffffea0000959608 ffffea00019d9408 0000000000000000\nraw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 00000000bfffffff 0000000000000000\npage dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\npage_owner tracks the page as freed\npage last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x52dc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), pid 5242, tgid 5242 (syz-executor), ts 73611328570, free_ts 618981657187\n set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [inline]\n post_alloc_hook+0x1f3/0x230 mm/page_alloc.c:1493\n prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1501 [inline]\n get_page_from_freelist+0x2e4c/0x2f10 mm/page_alloc.c:3439\n __alloc_pages_noprof+0x256/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4695\n __alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:269 [inline]\n alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:296 [inline]\n ___kmalloc_large_node+0x8b/0x1d0 mm/slub.c:4103\n __kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x1a/0x80 mm/slub.c:4130\n __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4146 [inline]\n __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x2d2/0x440 mm/slub.c:4164\n __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:650\n bucket_table_alloc lib/rhashtable.c:186 [inline]\n rhashtable_init_noprof+0x534/0xa60 lib/rhashtable.c:1071\n ila_xlat_init_net+0xa0/0x110 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:613\n ops_ini\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-46782)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrivers: media: dvb-frontends/rtl2830: fix an out-of-bounds write error\n\nEnsure index in rtl2830_pid_filter does not exceed 31 to prevent\nout-of-bounds access.\n\ndev-\u0026gt;filters is a 32-bit value, so set_bit and clear_bit functions should\nonly operate on indices from 0 to 31. If index is 32, it will attempt to\naccess a non-existent 33rd bit, leading to out-of-bounds access.\nChange the boundary check from index \u0026gt; 32 to index \u0026gt;= 32 to resolve this\nissue.(CVE-2024-47697)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnvme-rdma: unquiesce admin_q before destroy it\n\nKernel will hang on destroy admin_q while we create ctrl failed, such\nas following calltrace:\n\nPID: 23644 TASK: ff2d52b40f439fc0 CPU: 2 COMMAND: \u0026quot;nvme\u0026quot;\n #0 [ff61d23de260fb78] __schedule at ffffffff8323bc15\n #1 [ff61d23de260fc08] schedule at ffffffff8323c014\n #2 [ff61d23de260fc28] blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait at ffffffff82a3dba1\n #3 [ff61d23de260fc78] blk_freeze_queue at ffffffff82a4113a\n #4 [ff61d23de260fc90] blk_cleanup_queue at ffffffff82a33006\n #5 [ff61d23de260fcb0] nvme_rdma_destroy_admin_queue at ffffffffc12686ce\n #6 [ff61d23de260fcc8] nvme_rdma_setup_ctrl at ffffffffc1268ced\n #7 [ff61d23de260fd28] nvme_rdma_create_ctrl at ffffffffc126919b\n #8 [ff61d23de260fd68] nvmf_dev_write at ffffffffc024f362\n #9 [ff61d23de260fe38] vfs_write at ffffffff827d5f25\n RIP: 00007fda7891d574 RSP: 00007ffe2ef06958 RFLAGS: 00000202\n RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055e8122a4d90 RCX: 00007fda7891d574\n RDX: 000000000000012b RSI: 000055e8122a4d90 RDI: 0000000000000004\n RBP: 00007ffe2ef079c0 R8: 000000000000012b R9: 000055e8122a4d90\n R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000004\n R13: 000055e8122923c0 R14: 000000000000012b R15: 00007fda78a54500\n ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 CS: 0033 SS: 002b\n\nThis due to we have quiesced admi_q before cancel requests, but forgot\nto unquiesce before destroy it, as a result we fail to drain the\npending requests, and hang on blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() forever. Here\ntry to reuse nvme_rdma_teardown_admin_queue() to fix this issue and\nsimplify the code.(CVE-2024-49569)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: SCO: Fix UAF on sco_sock_timeout\n\nconn-\u0026gt;sk maybe have been unlinked/freed while waiting for sco_conn_lock\nso this checks if the conn-\u0026gt;sk is still valid by checking if it part of\nsco_sk_list.(CVE-2024-50125)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nusb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd()\n\nThe \u0026quot;*cmd\u0026quot; variable can be controlled by the user via debugfs. That means\n\u0026quot;new_cam\u0026quot; can be as high as 255 while the size of the uc-\u0026gt;updated[] array\nis UCSI_MAX_ALTMODES (30).\n\nThe call tree is:\nucsi_cmd() // val comes from simple_attr_write_xsigned()\n-\u0026gt; ucsi_send_command()\n -\u0026gt; ucsi_send_command_common()\n -\u0026gt; ucsi_run_command() // calls ucsi-\u0026gt;ops-\u0026gt;sync_control()\n -\u0026gt; ucsi_ccg_sync_control()(CVE-2024-50268)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/sched: stop qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog on TC_H_ROOT\n\nIn qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog, Qdiscs with major handle ffff: are assumed\nto be either root or ingress. This assumption is bogus since it\u0026apos;s valid\nto create egress qdiscs with major handle ffff:\nBudimir Markovic found that for qdiscs like DRR that maintain an active\nclass list, it will cause a UAF with a dangling class pointer.\n\nIn 066a3b5b2346, the concern was to avoid iterating over the ingress\nqdisc since its parent is itself. The proper fix is to stop when parent\nTC_H_ROOT is reached because the only way to retrieve ingress is when a\nhierarchy which does not contain a ffff: major handle call into\nqdisc_lookup with TC_H_MAJ(TC_H_ROOT).\n\nIn the scenario where major ffff: is an egress qdisc in any of the tree\nlevels, the updates will also propagate to TC_H_ROOT, which then the\niteration must stop.\n\n\n net/sched/sch_api.c | 2 +-\n 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)(CVE-2024-53057)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm: resolve faulty mmap_region() error path behaviour\n\nThe mmap_region() function is somewhat terrifying, with spaghetti-like\ncontrol flow and numerous means by which issues can arise and incomplete\nstate, memory leaks and other unpleasantness can occur.\n\nA large amount of the complexity arises from trying to handle errors late\nin the process of mapping a VMA, which forms the basis of recently\nobserved issues with resource leaks and observable inconsistent state.\n\nTaking advantage of previous patches in this series we move a number of\nchecks earlier in the code, simplifying things by moving the core of the\nlogic into a static internal function __mmap_region().\n\nDoing this allows us to perform a number of checks up front before we do\nany real work, and allows us to unwind the writable unmap check\nunconditionally as required and to perform a CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_MAPLE_TREE\nvalidation unconditionally also.\n\nWe move a number of things here:\n\n1. We preallocate memory for the iterator before we call the file-backed\n memory hook, allowing us to exit early and avoid having to perform\n complicated and error-prone close/free logic. We carefully free\n iterator state on both success and error paths.\n\n2. The enclosing mmap_region() function handles the mapping_map_writable()\n logic early. Previously the logic had the mapping_map_writable() at the\n point of mapping a newly allocated file-backed VMA, and a matching\n mapping_unmap_writable() on success and error paths.\n\n We now do this unconditionally if this is a file-backed, shared writable\n mapping. If a driver changes the flags to eliminate VM_MAYWRITE, however\n doing so does not invalidate the seal check we just performed, and we in\n any case always decrement the counter in the wrapper.\n\n We perform a debug assert to ensure a driver does not attempt to do the\n opposite.\n\n3. We also move arch_validate_flags() up into the mmap_region()\n function. This is only relevant on arm64 and sparc64, and the check is\n only meaningful for SPARC with ADI enabled. We explicitly add a warning\n for this arch if a driver invalidates this check, though the code ought\n eventually to be fixed to eliminate the need for this.\n\nWith all of these measures in place, we no longer need to explicitly close\nthe VMA on error paths, as we place all checks which might fail prior to a\ncall to any driver mmap hook.\n\nThis eliminates an entire class of errors, makes the code easier to reason\nabout and more robust.(CVE-2024-53096)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: ipset: add missing range check in bitmap_ip_uadt\n\nWhen tb[IPSET_ATTR_IP_TO] is not present but tb[IPSET_ATTR_CIDR] exists,\nthe values of ip and ip_to are slightly swapped. Therefore, the range check\nfor ip should be done later, but this part is missing and it seems that the\nvulnerability occurs.\n\nSo we should add missing range checks and remove unnecessary range checks.(CVE-2024-53141)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncomedi: Flush partial mappings in error case\n\nIf some remap_pfn_range() calls succeeded before one failed, we still have\nbuffer pages mapped into the userspace page tables when we drop the buffer\nreference with comedi_buf_map_put(bm). The userspace mappings are only\ncleaned up later in the mmap error path.\n\nFix it by explicitly flushing all mappings in our VMA on the error path.\n\nSee commit 79a61cc3fc04 (\u0026quot;mm: avoid leaving partial pfn mappings around in\nerror case\u0026quot;).(CVE-2024-53148)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: ath9k: add range check for conn_rsp_epid in htc_connect_service()\n\nI found the following bug in my fuzzer:\n\n UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_hst.c:26:51\n index 255 is out of range for type \u0026apos;htc_endpoint [22]\u0026apos;\n CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-dirty #14\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014\n Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x180/0x1b0\n __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xd4/0x130\n htc_issue_send.constprop.0+0x20c/0x230\n ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x70\n ath9k_wmi_cmd+0x41d/0x610\n ? mark_held_locks+0x9f/0xe0\n ...\n\nSince this bug has been confirmed to be caused by insufficient verification\nof conn_rsp_epid, I think it would be appropriate to add a range check for\nconn_rsp_epid to htc_connect_service() to prevent the bug from occurring.(CVE-2024-53156)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: inet6: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in inet6_create()\n\nsock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk pointer to the provided sock\nobject. If inet6_create() fails later, the sk object is released, but the\nsock object retains the dangling sk pointer, which may cause use-after-free\nlater.\n\nClear the sock sk pointer on error.(CVE-2024-56600)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: inet: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in inet_create()\n\nsock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk object to the provided sock\nobject. If inet_create() fails later, the sk object is freed, but the\nsock object retains the dangling pointer, which may create use-after-free\nlater.\n\nClear the sk pointer in the sock object on error.(CVE-2024-56601)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ngpio: grgpio: Add NULL check in grgpio_probe\n\ndevm_kasprintf() can return a NULL pointer on failure,but this\nreturned value in grgpio_probe is not checked.\nAdd NULL check in grgpio_probe, to handle kernel NULL\npointer dereference error.(CVE-2024-56634)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ns390/cpum_sf: Handle CPU hotplug remove during sampling\n\nCPU hotplug remove handling triggers the following function\ncall sequence:\n\n CPUHP_AP_PERF_S390_SF_ONLINE --\u0026gt; s390_pmu_sf_offline_cpu()\n ...\n CPUHP_AP_PERF_ONLINE --\u0026gt; perf_event_exit_cpu()\n\nThe s390 CPUMF sampling CPU hotplug handler invokes:\n\n s390_pmu_sf_offline_cpu()\n +--\u0026gt; cpusf_pmu_setup()\n +--\u0026gt; setup_pmc_cpu()\n +--\u0026gt; deallocate_buffers()\n\nThis function de-allocates all sampling data buffers (SDBs) allocated\nfor that CPU at event initialization. It also clears the\nPMU_F_RESERVED bit. The CPU is gone and can not be sampled.\n\nWith the event still being active on the removed CPU, the CPU event\nhotplug support in kernel performance subsystem triggers the\nfollowing function calls on the removed CPU:\n\n perf_event_exit_cpu()\n +--\u0026gt; perf_event_exit_cpu_context()\n +--\u0026gt; __perf_event_exit_context()\n\t +--\u0026gt; __perf_remove_from_context()\n\t +--\u0026gt; event_sched_out()\n\t +--\u0026gt; cpumsf_pmu_del()\n\t +--\u0026gt; cpumsf_pmu_stop()\n +--\u0026gt; hw_perf_event_update()\n\nto stop and remove the event. During removal of the event, the\nsampling device driver tries to read out the remaining samples from\nthe sample data buffers (SDBs). But they have already been freed\n(and may have been re-assigned). This may lead to a use after free\nsituation in which case the samples are most likely invalid. In the\nbest case the memory has not been reassigned and still contains\nvalid data.\n\nRemedy this situation and check if the CPU is still in reserved\nstate (bit PMU_F_RESERVED set). In this case the SDBs have not been\nreleased an contain valid data. This is always the case when\nthe event is removed (and no CPU hotplug off occured).\nIf the PMU_F_RESERVED bit is not set, the SDB buffers are gone.(CVE-2024-57849)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nila: serialize calls to nf_register_net_hooks()\n\nsyzbot found a race in ila_add_mapping() [1]\n\ncommit 031ae72825ce (\u0026quot;ila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner\u0026quot;)\nattempted to fix a similar issue.\n\nLooking at the syzbot repro, we have concurrent ILA_CMD_ADD commands.\n\nAdd a mutex to make sure at most one thread is calling nf_register_net_hooks().\n\n[1]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup.constprop.0+0x426/0x550 include/linux/rhashtable.h:604\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff888028f40008 by task dhcpcd/5501\n\nCPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 5501 Comm: dhcpcd Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-syzkaller-00054-gd6ef8b40d075 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline]\n print_report+0xc3/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:489\n kasan_report+0xd9/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:602\n rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n __rhashtable_lookup.constprop.0+0x426/0x550 include/linux/rhashtable.h:604\n rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup_fast include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 [inline]\n ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:127 [inline]\n ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline]\n ila_nf_input+0x1ee/0x620 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:185\n nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline]\n nf_hook_slow+0xbb/0x200 net/netfilter/core.c:626\n nf_hook.constprop.0+0x42e/0x750 include/linux/netfilter.h:269\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:312 [inline]\n ipv6_rcv+0xa4/0x680 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:309\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x12e/0x1e0 net/core/dev.c:5672\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1d/0x160 net/core/dev.c:5785\n process_backlog+0x443/0x15f0 net/core/dev.c:6117\n __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xb7/0x550 net/core/dev.c:6883\n napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6952 [inline]\n net_rx_action+0xa94/0x1010 net/core/dev.c:7074\n handle_softirqs+0x213/0x8f0 kernel/softirq.c:561\n __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:595 [inline]\n invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:435 [inline]\n __irq_exit_rcu+0x109/0x170 kernel/softirq.c:662\n irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:678\n instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 [inline]\n sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa4/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049(CVE-2024-57900)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsched: sch_cake: add bounds checks to host bulk flow fairness counts\n\nEven though we fixed a logic error in the commit cited below, syzbot\nstill managed to trigger an underflow of the per-host bulk flow\ncounters, leading to an out of bounds memory access.\n\nTo avoid any such logic errors causing out of bounds memory accesses,\nthis commit factors out all accesses to the per-host bulk flow counters\nto a series of helpers that perform bounds-checking before any\nincrements and decrements. This also has the benefit of improving\nreadability by moving the conditional checks for the flow mode into\nthese helpers, instead of having them spread out throughout the\ncode (which was the cause of the original logic error).\n\nAs part of this change, the flow quantum calculation is consolidated\ninto a helper function, which means that the dithering applied to the\nost load scaling is now applied both in the DRR rotation and when a\nsparse flow\u0026apos;s quantum is first initiated. The only user-visible effect\nof this is that the maximum packet size that can be sent while a flow\nstays sparse will now vary with +/- one byte in some cases. This should\nnot make a noticeable difference in practice, and thus it\u0026apos;s not worth\ncomplicating the code to preserve the old behaviour.(CVE-2025-21647)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: conntrack: clamp maximum hashtable size to INT_MAX\n\nUse INT_MAX as maximum size for the conntrack hashtable. Otherwise, it\nis possible to hit WARN_ON_ONCE in __kvmalloc_node_noprof() when\nresizing hashtable because __GFP_NOWARN is unset. See:\n\n 0708a0afe291 (\u0026quot;mm: Consider __GFP_NOWARN flag for oversized kvmalloc() calls\u0026quot;)\n\nNote: hashtable resize is only possible from init_netns.(CVE-2025-21648)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\niomap: avoid avoid truncating 64-bit offset to 32 bits\n\non 32-bit kernels, iomap_write_delalloc_scan() was inadvertently using a\n32-bit position due to folio_next_index() returning an unsigned long.\nThis could lead to an infinite loop when writing to an xfs filesystem.(CVE-2025-21667)",
"id": "OESA-2025-1158",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:08:15Z",
"published": "2025-02-21T11:08:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-1158"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46782"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47697"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49569"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50125"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50268"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53057"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53096"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53141"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53148"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53156"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56600"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56601"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56634"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57849"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57900"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21647"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21648"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21667"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2024-46782",
"CVE-2024-47697",
"CVE-2024-49569",
"CVE-2024-50125",
"CVE-2024-50268",
"CVE-2024-53057",
"CVE-2024-53096",
"CVE-2024-53141",
"CVE-2024-53148",
"CVE-2024-53156",
"CVE-2024-56600",
"CVE-2024-56601",
"CVE-2024-56634",
"CVE-2024-57849",
"CVE-2024-57900",
"CVE-2025-21647",
"CVE-2025-21648",
"CVE-2025-21667"
]
}
OESA-2025-1162 (CVE-2024-46782)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2025-02-21 11:08 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:08 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner
syzbot found an use-after-free Read in ila_nf_input [1]
Issue here is that ila_xlat_exit_net() frees the rhashtable, then call nf_unregister_net_hooks().
It should be done in the reverse way, with a synchronize_rcu().
This is a good match for a pre_exit() method.
[1] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888064620008 by task ksoftirqd/0/16
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00238-g2ad6d23f465a #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline] rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline] rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:132 [inline] ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline] ila_nf_input+0x1fe/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:190 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline] NF_HOOK+0x29e/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:312 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775 process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108 __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline] net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963 handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554 run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:928 smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 </TASK>
The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x64620 flags: 0xfff00000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff) page_type: 0xbfffffff(buddy) raw: 00fff00000000000 ffffea0000959608 ffffea00019d9408 0000000000000000 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 00000000bfffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected page_owner tracks the page as freed page last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x52dc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), pid 5242, tgid 5242 (syz-executor), ts 73611328570, free_ts 618981657187 set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [inline] post_alloc_hook+0x1f3/0x230 mm/page_alloc.c:1493 prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1501 [inline] get_page_from_freelist+0x2e4c/0x2f10 mm/page_alloc.c:3439 __alloc_pages_noprof+0x256/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4695 __alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:269 [inline] alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:296 [inline] kmalloclarge_node+0x8b/0x1d0 mm/slub.c:4103 kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x1a/0x80 mm/slub.c:4130 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4146 [inline] __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x2d2/0x440 mm/slub.c:4164 __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:650 bucket_table_alloc lib/rhashtable.c:186 [inline] rhashtable_init_noprof+0x534/0xa60 lib/rhashtable.c:1071 ila_xlat_init_net+0xa0/0x110 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:613 ops_ini ---truncated---(CVE-2024-46782)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drivers: media: dvb-frontends/rtl2830: fix an out-of-bounds write error
Ensure index in rtl2830_pid_filter does not exceed 31 to prevent out-of-bounds access.
dev->filters is a 32-bit value, so set_bit and clear_bit functions should only operate on indices from 0 to 31. If index is 32, it will attempt to access a non-existent 33rd bit, leading to out-of-bounds access. Change the boundary check from index > 32 to index >= 32 to resolve this issue.(CVE-2024-47697)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvme-rdma: unquiesce admin_q before destroy it
Kernel will hang on destroy admin_q while we create ctrl failed, such as following calltrace:
PID: 23644 TASK: ff2d52b40f439fc0 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "nvme" #0 [ff61d23de260fb78] __schedule at ffffffff8323bc15 #1 [ff61d23de260fc08] schedule at ffffffff8323c014 #2 [ff61d23de260fc28] blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait at ffffffff82a3dba1 #3 [ff61d23de260fc78] blk_freeze_queue at ffffffff82a4113a #4 [ff61d23de260fc90] blk_cleanup_queue at ffffffff82a33006 #5 [ff61d23de260fcb0] nvme_rdma_destroy_admin_queue at ffffffffc12686ce #6 [ff61d23de260fcc8] nvme_rdma_setup_ctrl at ffffffffc1268ced #7 [ff61d23de260fd28] nvme_rdma_create_ctrl at ffffffffc126919b #8 [ff61d23de260fd68] nvmf_dev_write at ffffffffc024f362 #9 [ff61d23de260fe38] vfs_write at ffffffff827d5f25 RIP: 00007fda7891d574 RSP: 00007ffe2ef06958 RFLAGS: 00000202 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055e8122a4d90 RCX: 00007fda7891d574 RDX: 000000000000012b RSI: 000055e8122a4d90 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 00007ffe2ef079c0 R8: 000000000000012b R9: 000055e8122a4d90 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000004 R13: 000055e8122923c0 R14: 000000000000012b R15: 00007fda78a54500 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 CS: 0033 SS: 002b
This due to we have quiesced admi_q before cancel requests, but forgot to unquiesce before destroy it, as a result we fail to drain the pending requests, and hang on blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() forever. Here try to reuse nvme_rdma_teardown_admin_queue() to fix this issue and simplify the code.(CVE-2024-49569)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix UAF on sco_sock_timeout
conn->sk maybe have been unlinked/freed while waiting for sco_conn_lock so this checks if the conn->sk is still valid by checking if it part of sco_sk_list.(CVE-2024-50125)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd()
The "*cmd" variable can be controlled by the user via debugfs. That means "new_cam" can be as high as 255 while the size of the uc->updated[] array is UCSI_MAX_ALTMODES (30).
The call tree is: ucsi_cmd() // val comes from simple_attr_write_xsigned() -> ucsi_send_command() -> ucsi_send_command_common() -> ucsi_run_command() // calls ucsi->ops->sync_control() -> ucsi_ccg_sync_control()(CVE-2024-50268)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/sched: stop qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog on TC_H_ROOT
In qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog, Qdiscs with major handle ffff: are assumed to be either root or ingress. This assumption is bogus since it's valid to create egress qdiscs with major handle ffff: Budimir Markovic found that for qdiscs like DRR that maintain an active class list, it will cause a UAF with a dangling class pointer.
In 066a3b5b2346, the concern was to avoid iterating over the ingress qdisc since its parent is itself. The proper fix is to stop when parent TC_H_ROOT is reached because the only way to retrieve ingress is when a hierarchy which does not contain a ffff: major handle call into qdisc_lookup with TC_H_MAJ(TC_H_ROOT).
In the scenario where major ffff: is an egress qdisc in any of the tree levels, the updates will also propagate to TC_H_ROOT, which then the iteration must stop.
net/sched/sch_api.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)(CVE-2024-53057)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm: resolve faulty mmap_region() error path behaviour
The mmap_region() function is somewhat terrifying, with spaghetti-like control flow and numerous means by which issues can arise and incomplete state, memory leaks and other unpleasantness can occur.
A large amount of the complexity arises from trying to handle errors late in the process of mapping a VMA, which forms the basis of recently observed issues with resource leaks and observable inconsistent state.
Taking advantage of previous patches in this series we move a number of checks earlier in the code, simplifying things by moving the core of the logic into a static internal function __mmap_region().
Doing this allows us to perform a number of checks up front before we do any real work, and allows us to unwind the writable unmap check unconditionally as required and to perform a CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_MAPLE_TREE validation unconditionally also.
We move a number of things here:
-
We preallocate memory for the iterator before we call the file-backed memory hook, allowing us to exit early and avoid having to perform complicated and error-prone close/free logic. We carefully free iterator state on both success and error paths.
-
The enclosing mmap_region() function handles the mapping_map_writable() logic early. Previously the logic had the mapping_map_writable() at the point of mapping a newly allocated file-backed VMA, and a matching mapping_unmap_writable() on success and error paths.
We now do this unconditionally if this is a file-backed, shared writable mapping. If a driver changes the flags to eliminate VM_MAYWRITE, however doing so does not invalidate the seal check we just performed, and we in any case always decrement the counter in the wrapper.
We perform a debug assert to ensure a driver does not attempt to do the opposite.
- We also move arch_validate_flags() up into the mmap_region() function. This is only relevant on arm64 and sparc64, and the check is only meaningful for SPARC with ADI enabled. We explicitly add a warning for this arch if a driver invalidates this check, though the code ought eventually to be fixed to eliminate the need for this.
With all of these measures in place, we no longer need to explicitly close the VMA on error paths, as we place all checks which might fail prior to a call to any driver mmap hook.
This eliminates an entire class of errors, makes the code easier to reason about and more robust.(CVE-2024-53096)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: ipset: add missing range check in bitmap_ip_uadt
When tb[IPSET_ATTR_IP_TO] is not present but tb[IPSET_ATTR_CIDR] exists, the values of ip and ip_to are slightly swapped. Therefore, the range check for ip should be done later, but this part is missing and it seems that the vulnerability occurs.
So we should add missing range checks and remove unnecessary range checks.(CVE-2024-53141)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
comedi: Flush partial mappings in error case
If some remap_pfn_range() calls succeeded before one failed, we still have buffer pages mapped into the userspace page tables when we drop the buffer reference with comedi_buf_map_put(bm). The userspace mappings are only cleaned up later in the mmap error path.
Fix it by explicitly flushing all mappings in our VMA on the error path.
See commit 79a61cc3fc04 ("mm: avoid leaving partial pfn mappings around in error case").(CVE-2024-53148)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: ath9k: add range check for conn_rsp_epid in htc_connect_service()
I found the following bug in my fuzzer:
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_hst.c:26:51 index 255 is out of range for type 'htc_endpoint [22]' CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-dirty #14 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x180/0x1b0 __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xd4/0x130 htc_issue_send.constprop.0+0x20c/0x230 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x70 ath9k_wmi_cmd+0x41d/0x610 ? mark_held_locks+0x9f/0xe0 ...
Since this bug has been confirmed to be caused by insufficient verification of conn_rsp_epid, I think it would be appropriate to add a range check for conn_rsp_epid to htc_connect_service() to prevent the bug from occurring.(CVE-2024-53156)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: inet6: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in inet6_create()
sock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk pointer to the provided sock object. If inet6_create() fails later, the sk object is released, but the sock object retains the dangling sk pointer, which may cause use-after-free later.
Clear the sock sk pointer on error.(CVE-2024-56600)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: inet: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in inet_create()
sock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk object to the provided sock object. If inet_create() fails later, the sk object is freed, but the sock object retains the dangling pointer, which may create use-after-free later.
Clear the sk pointer in the sock object on error.(CVE-2024-56601)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gpio: grgpio: Add NULL check in grgpio_probe
devm_kasprintf() can return a NULL pointer on failure,but this returned value in grgpio_probe is not checked. Add NULL check in grgpio_probe, to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference error.(CVE-2024-56634)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/cpum_sf: Handle CPU hotplug remove during sampling
CPU hotplug remove handling triggers the following function call sequence:
CPUHP_AP_PERF_S390_SF_ONLINE --> s390_pmu_sf_offline_cpu() ... CPUHP_AP_PERF_ONLINE --> perf_event_exit_cpu()
The s390 CPUMF sampling CPU hotplug handler invokes:
s390_pmu_sf_offline_cpu() +--> cpusf_pmu_setup() +--> setup_pmc_cpu() +--> deallocate_buffers()
This function de-allocates all sampling data buffers (SDBs) allocated for that CPU at event initialization. It also clears the PMU_F_RESERVED bit. The CPU is gone and can not be sampled.
With the event still being active on the removed CPU, the CPU event hotplug support in kernel performance subsystem triggers the following function calls on the removed CPU:
perf_event_exit_cpu() +--> perf_event_exit_cpu_context() +--> __perf_event_exit_context() +--> __perf_remove_from_context() +--> event_sched_out() +--> cpumsf_pmu_del() +--> cpumsf_pmu_stop() +--> hw_perf_event_update()
to stop and remove the event. During removal of the event, the sampling device driver tries to read out the remaining samples from the sample data buffers (SDBs). But they have already been freed (and may have been re-assigned). This may lead to a use after free situation in which case the samples are most likely invalid. In the best case the memory has not been reassigned and still contains valid data.
Remedy this situation and check if the CPU is still in reserved state (bit PMU_F_RESERVED set). In this case the SDBs have not been released an contain valid data. This is always the case when the event is removed (and no CPU hotplug off occured). If the PMU_F_RESERVED bit is not set, the SDB buffers are gone.(CVE-2024-57849)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ila: serialize calls to nf_register_net_hooks()
syzbot found a race in ila_add_mapping() [1]
commit 031ae72825ce ("ila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner") attempted to fix a similar issue.
Looking at the syzbot repro, we have concurrent ILA_CMD_ADD commands.
Add a mutex to make sure at most one thread is calling nf_register_net_hooks().
[1] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup.constprop.0+0x426/0x550 include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888028f40008 by task dhcpcd/5501
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 5501 Comm: dhcpcd Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-syzkaller-00054-gd6ef8b40d075 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline] print_report+0xc3/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:489 kasan_report+0xd9/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:602 rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline] __rhashtable_lookup.constprop.0+0x426/0x550 include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline] rhashtable_lookup_fast include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 [inline] ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:127 [inline] ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline] ila_nf_input+0x1ee/0x620 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:185 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xbb/0x200 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook.constprop.0+0x42e/0x750 include/linux/netfilter.h:269 NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:312 [inline] ipv6_rcv+0xa4/0x680 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:309 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x12e/0x1e0 net/core/dev.c:5672 __netif_receive_skb+0x1d/0x160 net/core/dev.c:5785 process_backlog+0x443/0x15f0 net/core/dev.c:6117 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xb7/0x550 net/core/dev.c:6883 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6952 [inline] net_rx_action+0xa94/0x1010 net/core/dev.c:7074 handle_softirqs+0x213/0x8f0 kernel/softirq.c:561 __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:595 [inline] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:435 [inline] __irq_exit_rcu+0x109/0x170 kernel/softirq.c:662 irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:678 instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 [inline] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa4/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049(CVE-2024-57900)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched: sch_cake: add bounds checks to host bulk flow fairness counts
Even though we fixed a logic error in the commit cited below, syzbot still managed to trigger an underflow of the per-host bulk flow counters, leading to an out of bounds memory access.
To avoid any such logic errors causing out of bounds memory accesses, this commit factors out all accesses to the per-host bulk flow counters to a series of helpers that perform bounds-checking before any increments and decrements. This also has the benefit of improving readability by moving the conditional checks for the flow mode into these helpers, instead of having them spread out throughout the code (which was the cause of the original logic error).
As part of this change, the flow quantum calculation is consolidated into a helper function, which means that the dithering applied to the ost load scaling is now applied both in the DRR rotation and when a sparse flow's quantum is first initiated. The only user-visible effect of this is that the maximum packet size that can be sent while a flow stays sparse will now vary with +/- one byte in some cases. This should not make a noticeable difference in practice, and thus it's not worth complicating the code to preserve the old behaviour.(CVE-2025-21647)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: conntrack: clamp maximum hashtable size to INT_MAX
Use INT_MAX as maximum size for the conntrack hashtable. Otherwise, it is possible to hit WARN_ON_ONCE in __kvmalloc_node_noprof() when resizing hashtable because __GFP_NOWARN is unset. See:
0708a0afe291 ("mm: Consider __GFP_NOWARN flag for oversized kvmalloc() calls")
Note: hashtable resize is only possible from init_netns.(CVE-2025-21648)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iomap: avoid avoid truncating 64-bit offset to 32 bits
on 32-bit kernels, iomap_write_delalloc_scan() was inadvertently using a 32-bit position due to folio_next_index() returning an unsigned long. This could lead to an infinite loop when writing to an xfs filesystem.(CVE-2025-21667)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-250.0.0.153.oe2203sp3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner\n\nsyzbot found an use-after-free Read in ila_nf_input [1]\n\nIssue here is that ila_xlat_exit_net() frees the rhashtable,\nthen call nf_unregister_net_hooks().\n\nIt should be done in the reverse way, with a synchronize_rcu().\n\nThis is a good match for a pre_exit() method.\n\n[1]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff888064620008 by task ksoftirqd/0/16\n\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00238-g2ad6d23f465a #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:604 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup_fast+0x77a/0x9b0 include/linux/rhashtable.h:672\n ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:132 [inline]\n ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline]\n ila_nf_input+0x1fe/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:190\n nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline]\n nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626\n nf_hook include/linux/netfilter.h:269 [inline]\n NF_HOOK+0x29e/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:312\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1ea/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775\n process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108\n __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772\n napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]\n net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963\n handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554\n run_ksoftirqd+0xca/0x130 kernel/softirq.c:928\n smpboot_thread_fn+0x544/0xa30 kernel/smpboot.c:164\n kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389\n ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\nThe buggy address belongs to the physical page:\npage: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x64620\nflags: 0xfff00000000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff)\npage_type: 0xbfffffff(buddy)\nraw: 00fff00000000000 ffffea0000959608 ffffea00019d9408 0000000000000000\nraw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 00000000bfffffff 0000000000000000\npage dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\npage_owner tracks the page as freed\npage last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x52dc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_ZERO), pid 5242, tgid 5242 (syz-executor), ts 73611328570, free_ts 618981657187\n set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:32 [inline]\n post_alloc_hook+0x1f3/0x230 mm/page_alloc.c:1493\n prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1501 [inline]\n get_page_from_freelist+0x2e4c/0x2f10 mm/page_alloc.c:3439\n __alloc_pages_noprof+0x256/0x6c0 mm/page_alloc.c:4695\n __alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:269 [inline]\n alloc_pages_node_noprof include/linux/gfp.h:296 [inline]\n ___kmalloc_large_node+0x8b/0x1d0 mm/slub.c:4103\n __kmalloc_large_node_noprof+0x1a/0x80 mm/slub.c:4130\n __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4146 [inline]\n __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x2d2/0x440 mm/slub.c:4164\n __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x72/0x190 mm/util.c:650\n bucket_table_alloc lib/rhashtable.c:186 [inline]\n rhashtable_init_noprof+0x534/0xa60 lib/rhashtable.c:1071\n ila_xlat_init_net+0xa0/0x110 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:613\n ops_ini\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-46782)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrivers: media: dvb-frontends/rtl2830: fix an out-of-bounds write error\n\nEnsure index in rtl2830_pid_filter does not exceed 31 to prevent\nout-of-bounds access.\n\ndev-\u0026gt;filters is a 32-bit value, so set_bit and clear_bit functions should\nonly operate on indices from 0 to 31. If index is 32, it will attempt to\naccess a non-existent 33rd bit, leading to out-of-bounds access.\nChange the boundary check from index \u0026gt; 32 to index \u0026gt;= 32 to resolve this\nissue.(CVE-2024-47697)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnvme-rdma: unquiesce admin_q before destroy it\n\nKernel will hang on destroy admin_q while we create ctrl failed, such\nas following calltrace:\n\nPID: 23644 TASK: ff2d52b40f439fc0 CPU: 2 COMMAND: \u0026quot;nvme\u0026quot;\n #0 [ff61d23de260fb78] __schedule at ffffffff8323bc15\n #1 [ff61d23de260fc08] schedule at ffffffff8323c014\n #2 [ff61d23de260fc28] blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait at ffffffff82a3dba1\n #3 [ff61d23de260fc78] blk_freeze_queue at ffffffff82a4113a\n #4 [ff61d23de260fc90] blk_cleanup_queue at ffffffff82a33006\n #5 [ff61d23de260fcb0] nvme_rdma_destroy_admin_queue at ffffffffc12686ce\n #6 [ff61d23de260fcc8] nvme_rdma_setup_ctrl at ffffffffc1268ced\n #7 [ff61d23de260fd28] nvme_rdma_create_ctrl at ffffffffc126919b\n #8 [ff61d23de260fd68] nvmf_dev_write at ffffffffc024f362\n #9 [ff61d23de260fe38] vfs_write at ffffffff827d5f25\n RIP: 00007fda7891d574 RSP: 00007ffe2ef06958 RFLAGS: 00000202\n RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055e8122a4d90 RCX: 00007fda7891d574\n RDX: 000000000000012b RSI: 000055e8122a4d90 RDI: 0000000000000004\n RBP: 00007ffe2ef079c0 R8: 000000000000012b R9: 000055e8122a4d90\n R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000004\n R13: 000055e8122923c0 R14: 000000000000012b R15: 00007fda78a54500\n ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 CS: 0033 SS: 002b\n\nThis due to we have quiesced admi_q before cancel requests, but forgot\nto unquiesce before destroy it, as a result we fail to drain the\npending requests, and hang on blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() forever. Here\ntry to reuse nvme_rdma_teardown_admin_queue() to fix this issue and\nsimplify the code.(CVE-2024-49569)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: SCO: Fix UAF on sco_sock_timeout\n\nconn-\u0026gt;sk maybe have been unlinked/freed while waiting for sco_conn_lock\nso this checks if the conn-\u0026gt;sk is still valid by checking if it part of\nsco_sk_list.(CVE-2024-50125)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nusb: typec: fix potential out of bounds in ucsi_ccg_update_set_new_cam_cmd()\n\nThe \u0026quot;*cmd\u0026quot; variable can be controlled by the user via debugfs. That means\n\u0026quot;new_cam\u0026quot; can be as high as 255 while the size of the uc-\u0026gt;updated[] array\nis UCSI_MAX_ALTMODES (30).\n\nThe call tree is:\nucsi_cmd() // val comes from simple_attr_write_xsigned()\n-\u0026gt; ucsi_send_command()\n -\u0026gt; ucsi_send_command_common()\n -\u0026gt; ucsi_run_command() // calls ucsi-\u0026gt;ops-\u0026gt;sync_control()\n -\u0026gt; ucsi_ccg_sync_control()(CVE-2024-50268)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/sched: stop qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog on TC_H_ROOT\n\nIn qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog, Qdiscs with major handle ffff: are assumed\nto be either root or ingress. This assumption is bogus since it\u0026apos;s valid\nto create egress qdiscs with major handle ffff:\nBudimir Markovic found that for qdiscs like DRR that maintain an active\nclass list, it will cause a UAF with a dangling class pointer.\n\nIn 066a3b5b2346, the concern was to avoid iterating over the ingress\nqdisc since its parent is itself. The proper fix is to stop when parent\nTC_H_ROOT is reached because the only way to retrieve ingress is when a\nhierarchy which does not contain a ffff: major handle call into\nqdisc_lookup with TC_H_MAJ(TC_H_ROOT).\n\nIn the scenario where major ffff: is an egress qdisc in any of the tree\nlevels, the updates will also propagate to TC_H_ROOT, which then the\niteration must stop.\n\n\n net/sched/sch_api.c | 2 +-\n 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)(CVE-2024-53057)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm: resolve faulty mmap_region() error path behaviour\n\nThe mmap_region() function is somewhat terrifying, with spaghetti-like\ncontrol flow and numerous means by which issues can arise and incomplete\nstate, memory leaks and other unpleasantness can occur.\n\nA large amount of the complexity arises from trying to handle errors late\nin the process of mapping a VMA, which forms the basis of recently\nobserved issues with resource leaks and observable inconsistent state.\n\nTaking advantage of previous patches in this series we move a number of\nchecks earlier in the code, simplifying things by moving the core of the\nlogic into a static internal function __mmap_region().\n\nDoing this allows us to perform a number of checks up front before we do\nany real work, and allows us to unwind the writable unmap check\nunconditionally as required and to perform a CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_MAPLE_TREE\nvalidation unconditionally also.\n\nWe move a number of things here:\n\n1. We preallocate memory for the iterator before we call the file-backed\n memory hook, allowing us to exit early and avoid having to perform\n complicated and error-prone close/free logic. We carefully free\n iterator state on both success and error paths.\n\n2. The enclosing mmap_region() function handles the mapping_map_writable()\n logic early. Previously the logic had the mapping_map_writable() at the\n point of mapping a newly allocated file-backed VMA, and a matching\n mapping_unmap_writable() on success and error paths.\n\n We now do this unconditionally if this is a file-backed, shared writable\n mapping. If a driver changes the flags to eliminate VM_MAYWRITE, however\n doing so does not invalidate the seal check we just performed, and we in\n any case always decrement the counter in the wrapper.\n\n We perform a debug assert to ensure a driver does not attempt to do the\n opposite.\n\n3. We also move arch_validate_flags() up into the mmap_region()\n function. This is only relevant on arm64 and sparc64, and the check is\n only meaningful for SPARC with ADI enabled. We explicitly add a warning\n for this arch if a driver invalidates this check, though the code ought\n eventually to be fixed to eliminate the need for this.\n\nWith all of these measures in place, we no longer need to explicitly close\nthe VMA on error paths, as we place all checks which might fail prior to a\ncall to any driver mmap hook.\n\nThis eliminates an entire class of errors, makes the code easier to reason\nabout and more robust.(CVE-2024-53096)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: ipset: add missing range check in bitmap_ip_uadt\n\nWhen tb[IPSET_ATTR_IP_TO] is not present but tb[IPSET_ATTR_CIDR] exists,\nthe values of ip and ip_to are slightly swapped. Therefore, the range check\nfor ip should be done later, but this part is missing and it seems that the\nvulnerability occurs.\n\nSo we should add missing range checks and remove unnecessary range checks.(CVE-2024-53141)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncomedi: Flush partial mappings in error case\n\nIf some remap_pfn_range() calls succeeded before one failed, we still have\nbuffer pages mapped into the userspace page tables when we drop the buffer\nreference with comedi_buf_map_put(bm). The userspace mappings are only\ncleaned up later in the mmap error path.\n\nFix it by explicitly flushing all mappings in our VMA on the error path.\n\nSee commit 79a61cc3fc04 (\u0026quot;mm: avoid leaving partial pfn mappings around in\nerror case\u0026quot;).(CVE-2024-53148)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: ath9k: add range check for conn_rsp_epid in htc_connect_service()\n\nI found the following bug in my fuzzer:\n\n UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_hst.c:26:51\n index 255 is out of range for type \u0026apos;htc_endpoint [22]\u0026apos;\n CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-dirty #14\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014\n Workqueue: events request_firmware_work_func\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x180/0x1b0\n __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xd4/0x130\n htc_issue_send.constprop.0+0x20c/0x230\n ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x70\n ath9k_wmi_cmd+0x41d/0x610\n ? mark_held_locks+0x9f/0xe0\n ...\n\nSince this bug has been confirmed to be caused by insufficient verification\nof conn_rsp_epid, I think it would be appropriate to add a range check for\nconn_rsp_epid to htc_connect_service() to prevent the bug from occurring.(CVE-2024-53156)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: inet6: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in inet6_create()\n\nsock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk pointer to the provided sock\nobject. If inet6_create() fails later, the sk object is released, but the\nsock object retains the dangling sk pointer, which may cause use-after-free\nlater.\n\nClear the sock sk pointer on error.(CVE-2024-56600)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: inet: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in inet_create()\n\nsock_init_data() attaches the allocated sk object to the provided sock\nobject. If inet_create() fails later, the sk object is freed, but the\nsock object retains the dangling pointer, which may create use-after-free\nlater.\n\nClear the sk pointer in the sock object on error.(CVE-2024-56601)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ngpio: grgpio: Add NULL check in grgpio_probe\n\ndevm_kasprintf() can return a NULL pointer on failure,but this\nreturned value in grgpio_probe is not checked.\nAdd NULL check in grgpio_probe, to handle kernel NULL\npointer dereference error.(CVE-2024-56634)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ns390/cpum_sf: Handle CPU hotplug remove during sampling\n\nCPU hotplug remove handling triggers the following function\ncall sequence:\n\n CPUHP_AP_PERF_S390_SF_ONLINE --\u0026gt; s390_pmu_sf_offline_cpu()\n ...\n CPUHP_AP_PERF_ONLINE --\u0026gt; perf_event_exit_cpu()\n\nThe s390 CPUMF sampling CPU hotplug handler invokes:\n\n s390_pmu_sf_offline_cpu()\n +--\u0026gt; cpusf_pmu_setup()\n +--\u0026gt; setup_pmc_cpu()\n +--\u0026gt; deallocate_buffers()\n\nThis function de-allocates all sampling data buffers (SDBs) allocated\nfor that CPU at event initialization. It also clears the\nPMU_F_RESERVED bit. The CPU is gone and can not be sampled.\n\nWith the event still being active on the removed CPU, the CPU event\nhotplug support in kernel performance subsystem triggers the\nfollowing function calls on the removed CPU:\n\n perf_event_exit_cpu()\n +--\u0026gt; perf_event_exit_cpu_context()\n +--\u0026gt; __perf_event_exit_context()\n\t +--\u0026gt; __perf_remove_from_context()\n\t +--\u0026gt; event_sched_out()\n\t +--\u0026gt; cpumsf_pmu_del()\n\t +--\u0026gt; cpumsf_pmu_stop()\n +--\u0026gt; hw_perf_event_update()\n\nto stop and remove the event. During removal of the event, the\nsampling device driver tries to read out the remaining samples from\nthe sample data buffers (SDBs). But they have already been freed\n(and may have been re-assigned). This may lead to a use after free\nsituation in which case the samples are most likely invalid. In the\nbest case the memory has not been reassigned and still contains\nvalid data.\n\nRemedy this situation and check if the CPU is still in reserved\nstate (bit PMU_F_RESERVED set). In this case the SDBs have not been\nreleased an contain valid data. This is always the case when\nthe event is removed (and no CPU hotplug off occured).\nIf the PMU_F_RESERVED bit is not set, the SDB buffers are gone.(CVE-2024-57849)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nila: serialize calls to nf_register_net_hooks()\n\nsyzbot found a race in ila_add_mapping() [1]\n\ncommit 031ae72825ce (\u0026quot;ila: call nf_unregister_net_hooks() sooner\u0026quot;)\nattempted to fix a similar issue.\n\nLooking at the syzbot repro, we have concurrent ILA_CMD_ADD commands.\n\nAdd a mutex to make sure at most one thread is calling nf_register_net_hooks().\n\n[1]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __rhashtable_lookup.constprop.0+0x426/0x550 include/linux/rhashtable.h:604\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff888028f40008 by task dhcpcd/5501\n\nCPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 5501 Comm: dhcpcd Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-syzkaller-00054-gd6ef8b40d075 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline]\n print_report+0xc3/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:489\n kasan_report+0xd9/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:602\n rht_key_hashfn include/linux/rhashtable.h:159 [inline]\n __rhashtable_lookup.constprop.0+0x426/0x550 include/linux/rhashtable.h:604\n rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup_fast include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 [inline]\n ila_lookup_wildcards net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:127 [inline]\n ila_xlat_addr net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:652 [inline]\n ila_nf_input+0x1ee/0x620 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c:185\n nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline]\n nf_hook_slow+0xbb/0x200 net/netfilter/core.c:626\n nf_hook.constprop.0+0x42e/0x750 include/linux/netfilter.h:269\n NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:312 [inline]\n ipv6_rcv+0xa4/0x680 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:309\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x12e/0x1e0 net/core/dev.c:5672\n __netif_receive_skb+0x1d/0x160 net/core/dev.c:5785\n process_backlog+0x443/0x15f0 net/core/dev.c:6117\n __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xb7/0x550 net/core/dev.c:6883\n napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6952 [inline]\n net_rx_action+0xa94/0x1010 net/core/dev.c:7074\n handle_softirqs+0x213/0x8f0 kernel/softirq.c:561\n __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:595 [inline]\n invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:435 [inline]\n __irq_exit_rcu+0x109/0x170 kernel/softirq.c:662\n irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:678\n instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 [inline]\n sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa4/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049(CVE-2024-57900)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsched: sch_cake: add bounds checks to host bulk flow fairness counts\n\nEven though we fixed a logic error in the commit cited below, syzbot\nstill managed to trigger an underflow of the per-host bulk flow\ncounters, leading to an out of bounds memory access.\n\nTo avoid any such logic errors causing out of bounds memory accesses,\nthis commit factors out all accesses to the per-host bulk flow counters\nto a series of helpers that perform bounds-checking before any\nincrements and decrements. This also has the benefit of improving\nreadability by moving the conditional checks for the flow mode into\nthese helpers, instead of having them spread out throughout the\ncode (which was the cause of the original logic error).\n\nAs part of this change, the flow quantum calculation is consolidated\ninto a helper function, which means that the dithering applied to the\nost load scaling is now applied both in the DRR rotation and when a\nsparse flow\u0026apos;s quantum is first initiated. The only user-visible effect\nof this is that the maximum packet size that can be sent while a flow\nstays sparse will now vary with +/- one byte in some cases. This should\nnot make a noticeable difference in practice, and thus it\u0026apos;s not worth\ncomplicating the code to preserve the old behaviour.(CVE-2025-21647)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: conntrack: clamp maximum hashtable size to INT_MAX\n\nUse INT_MAX as maximum size for the conntrack hashtable. Otherwise, it\nis possible to hit WARN_ON_ONCE in __kvmalloc_node_noprof() when\nresizing hashtable because __GFP_NOWARN is unset. See:\n\n 0708a0afe291 (\u0026quot;mm: Consider __GFP_NOWARN flag for oversized kvmalloc() calls\u0026quot;)\n\nNote: hashtable resize is only possible from init_netns.(CVE-2025-21648)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\niomap: avoid avoid truncating 64-bit offset to 32 bits\n\non 32-bit kernels, iomap_write_delalloc_scan() was inadvertently using a\n32-bit position due to folio_next_index() returning an unsigned long.\nThis could lead to an infinite loop when writing to an xfs filesystem.(CVE-2025-21667)",
"id": "OESA-2025-1162",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:08:15Z",
"published": "2025-02-21T11:08:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-1162"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46782"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47697"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49569"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50125"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50268"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53057"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53096"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53141"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53148"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53156"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56600"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56601"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56634"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57849"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57900"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21647"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21648"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21667"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2024-46782",
"CVE-2024-47697",
"CVE-2024-49569",
"CVE-2024-50125",
"CVE-2024-50268",
"CVE-2024-53057",
"CVE-2024-53096",
"CVE-2024-53141",
"CVE-2024-53148",
"CVE-2024-53156",
"CVE-2024-56600",
"CVE-2024-56601",
"CVE-2024-56634",
"CVE-2024-57849",
"CVE-2024-57900",
"CVE-2025-21647",
"CVE-2025-21648",
"CVE-2025-21667"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.