CWE-295

Improper Certificate Validation

The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.

CVE-2025-40800 (GCVE-0-2025-40800)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-09 10:44 – Updated: 2026-03-10 16:07
VLAI
Summary
A vulnerability has been identified in COMOS V10.6 (All versions < V10.6.1), COMOS V10.6 (All versions < V10.6.1), NX V2412 (All versions < V2412.8700), NX V2506 (All versions < V2506.6000), Simcenter 3D (All versions < V2506.6000), Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2506.0002), Solid Edge SE2025 (All versions < V225.0 Update 10), Solid Edge SE2026 (All versions < V226.0 Update 1). The IAM client in affected products is missing server certificate validation while establishing TLS connections to the authorization server. This could allow an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack.
CWE
  • CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Siemens COMOS V10.6 Affected: 0 , < V10.6.1 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Siemens COMOS V10.6 Affected: 0 , < V10.6.1 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Siemens NX V2412 Affected: 0 , < V2412.8700 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Siemens NX V2506 Affected: 0 , < V2506.6000 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Siemens Simcenter 3D Affected: 0 , < V2506.6000 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Siemens Simcenter Femap Affected: 0 , < V2506.0002 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Siemens Solid Edge SE2025 Affected: 0 , < V225.0 Update 10 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Siemens Solid Edge SE2026 Affected: 0 , < V226.0 Update 1 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-40800",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-12-09T14:27:11.176631Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-12-09T14:27:15.289Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "COMOS V10.6",
          "vendor": "Siemens",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "V10.6.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "COMOS V10.6",
          "vendor": "Siemens",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "V10.6.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "NX V2412",
          "vendor": "Siemens",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "V2412.8700",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "NX V2506",
          "vendor": "Siemens",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "V2506.6000",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "Simcenter 3D",
          "vendor": "Siemens",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "V2506.6000",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "Simcenter Femap",
          "vendor": "Siemens",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "V2506.0002",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "Solid Edge SE2025",
          "vendor": "Siemens",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "V225.0 Update 10",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "Solid Edge SE2026",
          "vendor": "Siemens",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "V226.0 Update 1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A vulnerability has been identified in COMOS V10.6 (All versions \u003c V10.6.1), COMOS V10.6 (All versions \u003c V10.6.1), NX V2412 (All versions \u003c V2412.8700), NX V2506 (All versions \u003c V2506.6000), Simcenter 3D (All versions \u003c V2506.6000), Simcenter Femap (All versions \u003c V2506.0002), Solid Edge SE2025 (All versions \u003c V225.0 Update 10), Solid Edge SE2026 (All versions \u003c V226.0 Update 1). The IAM client in affected products is missing server certificate validation while establishing TLS connections to the authorization server. This could allow an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 7.4,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        },
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "baseScore": 9.1,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-295",
              "description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-03-10T16:07:47.742Z",
        "orgId": "cec7a2ec-15b4-4faf-bd53-b40f371f3a77",
        "shortName": "siemens"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-868571.html"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-212953.html"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "cec7a2ec-15b4-4faf-bd53-b40f371f3a77",
    "assignerShortName": "siemens",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-40800",
    "datePublished": "2025-12-09T10:44:23.488Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-04-16T08:50:26.973Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-03-10T16:07:47.742Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2025-40801 (GCVE-0-2025-40801)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-09 10:44 – Updated: 2026-03-10 16:07
VLAI
Summary
A vulnerability has been identified in COMOS V10.6 (All versions < V10.6.1), COMOS V10.6 (All versions < V10.6.1), JT Bi-Directional Translator for STEP (All versions), NX V2412 (All versions < V2412.8900 with Cloud Entitlement (bundled as NX X)), NX V2506 (All versions < V2506.6000 with Cloud Entitlement (bundled as NX X)), Simcenter 3D (All versions < V2506.6000 with Cloud Entitlement (bundled as Simcenter X Mechanical)), Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2506.0002 with Cloud Entitlement (bundled as Simcenter X Mechanical)), Simcenter Studio (All versions < V2506.0001), Simcenter System Architect (All versions < V2506.0001), Tecnomatix Plant Simulation (All versions < V2504.0007). The SALT SDK is missing server certificate validation while establishing TLS connections to the authorization server. This could allow an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack.
CWE
  • CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-40801",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-12-09T14:26:50.494757Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-12-09T14:26:55.244Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "COMOS V10.6",
          "vendor": "Siemens",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "V10.6.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "COMOS V10.6",
          "vendor": "Siemens",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "V10.6.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "JT Bi-Directional Translator for STEP",
          "vendor": "Siemens",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "*",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "NX V2412",
          "vendor": "Siemens",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "V2412.8900",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "NX V2506",
          "vendor": "Siemens",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "V2506.6000",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "Simcenter 3D",
          "vendor": "Siemens",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "V2506.6000",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "Simcenter Femap",
          "vendor": "Siemens",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "V2506.0002",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "Simcenter Studio",
          "vendor": "Siemens",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "V2506.0001",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "Simcenter System Architect",
          "vendor": "Siemens",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "V2506.0001",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "Tecnomatix Plant Simulation",
          "vendor": "Siemens",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "V2504.0007",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A vulnerability has been identified in COMOS V10.6 (All versions \u003c V10.6.1), COMOS V10.6 (All versions \u003c V10.6.1), JT Bi-Directional Translator for STEP (All versions), NX V2412 (All versions \u003c V2412.8900 with Cloud Entitlement (bundled as NX X)), NX V2506 (All versions \u003c V2506.6000 with Cloud Entitlement (bundled as NX X)), Simcenter 3D (All versions \u003c V2506.6000 with Cloud Entitlement (bundled as Simcenter X Mechanical)), Simcenter Femap (All versions \u003c V2506.0002 with Cloud Entitlement (bundled as Simcenter X Mechanical)), Simcenter Studio (All versions \u003c V2506.0001), Simcenter System Architect (All versions \u003c V2506.0001), Tecnomatix Plant Simulation (All versions \u003c V2504.0007). The SALT SDK is missing server certificate validation while establishing TLS connections to the authorization server. This could allow an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 8.1,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        },
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "baseScore": 9.2,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-295",
              "description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-03-10T16:07:48.826Z",
        "orgId": "cec7a2ec-15b4-4faf-bd53-b40f371f3a77",
        "shortName": "siemens"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-710408.html"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-212953.html"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "cec7a2ec-15b4-4faf-bd53-b40f371f3a77",
    "assignerShortName": "siemens",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-40801",
    "datePublished": "2025-12-09T10:44:24.727Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-04-16T08:50:26.973Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-03-10T16:07:48.826Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2025-40896 (GCVE-0-2025-40896)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-04 13:52 – Updated: 2026-03-04 14:11
VLAI
Title
Lack of TLS certificate validation when connecting Arc to a Guardian or CMC, in Arc before v2.2.0
Summary
The server certificate was not verified when an Arc agent connected to a Guardian or CMC. A malicious actor could perform a man-in-the-middle attack and intercept the communication between the Arc agent and the Guardian or CMC. This could result in theft of the client token and sensitive information (such as assets and alerts), impersonation of the server, or injection of spoofed data (such as false asset information or vulnerabilities) into the Guardian or CMC.
CWE
  • CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Nozomi Networks Arc Affected: 0 , < 2.2.0 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-03-04 08:00
Credits
This issue was found by Felix Eberstaller of Limes Security during a VAPT testing session commissioned by one of our customers.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-40896",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-03-04T14:11:20.778867Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-03-04T14:11:30.915Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Arc",
          "vendor": "Nozomi Networks",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.2.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "cpeApplicability": [
        {
          "nodes": [
            {
              "cpeMatch": [
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:nozomi_networks:arc:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "versionEndExcluding": "2.2.0",
                  "versionStartIncluding": "0",
                  "vulnerable": true
                }
              ],
              "negate": false,
              "operator": "OR"
            }
          ],
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
          "value": "This issue was found by Felix Eberstaller of Limes Security during a VAPT testing session commissioned by one of our customers."
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-03-04T08:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eThe server certificate was not verified when an Arc agent connected to a Guardian or CMC.\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eA malicious actor could perform a man-in-the-middle attack and intercept the communication between the Arc agent and the Guardian or CMC. This could result in theft of the client token and sensitive information (such as assets and alerts), impersonation of the server, or injection of spoofed data (such as false asset information or vulnerabilities) into the Guardian or CMC.\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The server certificate was not verified when an Arc agent connected to a Guardian or CMC.\n\n\n\nA malicious actor could perform a man-in-the-middle attack and intercept the communication between the Arc agent and the Guardian or CMC. This could result in theft of the client token and sensitive information (such as assets and alerts), impersonation of the server, or injection of spoofed data (such as false asset information or vulnerabilities) into the Guardian or CMC."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-475",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-475 Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 6.5,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-295",
              "description": "CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-03-04T13:52:52.749Z",
        "orgId": "bec8025f-a851-46e5-b3a3-058e6b0aa23c",
        "shortName": "Nozomi"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://security.nozominetworks.com/NN-2025:18-01"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eUpgrade Arc to v2.2.0 or later.\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Upgrade Arc to v2.2.0 or later."
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "Lack of TLS certificate validation when connecting Arc to a Guardian or CMC, in Arc before v2.2.0",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "bec8025f-a851-46e5-b3a3-058e6b0aa23c",
    "assignerShortName": "Nozomi",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-40896",
    "datePublished": "2026-03-04T13:52:52.749Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-04-16T09:04:35.922Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-03-04T14:11:30.915Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2025-42611 (GCVE-0-2025-42611)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-05 10:58 – Updated: 2026-05-05 12:49
VLAI
Title
Improper certificate validation in multiple RouterOS services
Summary
RouterOS provides various services that rely on correct verification of client and server certificates to secure confidentiality and integrity of communications. This includes OpenVPN, CAPsMAN, Dot1x (802.1X), among others. The vulnerability lies in shared certificate validation logic which uses the system certificate store that is shared and equally trusted by all system services. This causes confusion of scope, allowing any certificate authority present in the system-wide trust store to be trusted in any context (with some exceptions), allowing partial or full authentication bypass in CAPsMAN, OpenVPN, Dot1X and potentially others.
CWE
  • CWE-295 - Improper certificate validation
Assigner
References
URL Tags
https://www.cert.si/en/cve-2025-42611/ third-party-advisorygovernment-resource
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Mikrotik RouterOS Affected: 0 , ≤ 7.20.x (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-42611",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-05-05T12:38:09.152163Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-05-05T12:49:47.495Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "RouterOS",
          "vendor": "Mikrotik",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "7.20.x",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eRouterOS provides various services that rely on correct\nverification of client and server certificates to secure confidentiality and\nintegrity of communications. This includes OpenVPN, CAPsMAN, Dot1x (802.1X),\namong others.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe vulnerability lies in shared certificate validation\nlogic which uses the system certificate store that is shared and equally\ntrusted by all system services. This causes confusion of scope, allowing any\ncertificate authority present in the system-wide trust store to be trusted in\nany context (with some exceptions), allowing partial or full authentication\nbypass in CAPsMAN, OpenVPN, Dot1X and potentially others. \u003c/p\u003e\n\n\n\n\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "RouterOS provides various services that rely on correct\nverification of client and server certificates to secure confidentiality and\nintegrity of communications. This includes OpenVPN, CAPsMAN, Dot1x (802.1X),\namong others.\n\n\n\nThe vulnerability lies in shared certificate validation\nlogic which uses the system certificate store that is shared and equally\ntrusted by all system services. This causes confusion of scope, allowing any\ncertificate authority present in the system-wide trust store to be trusted in\nany context (with some exceptions), allowing partial or full authentication\nbypass in CAPsMAN, OpenVPN, Dot1X and potentially others."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-115",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-115 Authentication Bypass"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 6.5,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-295",
              "description": "CWE-295 Improper certificate validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-05-05T10:58:36.937Z",
        "orgId": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158",
        "shortName": "ENISA"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "third-party-advisory",
            "government-resource"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.cert.si/en/cve-2025-42611/"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Improper certificate validation in multiple RouterOS services",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158",
    "assignerShortName": "ENISA",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-42611",
    "datePublished": "2026-05-05T10:58:36.937Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-04-16T12:34:02.865Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-05-05T12:49:47.495Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2025-44018 (GCVE-0-2025-44018)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-24 15:11 – Updated: 2025-11-24 17:03
VLAI
Summary
A firmware downgrade vulnerability exists in the OTA Update functionality of GL-Inet GL-AXT1800 4.7.0. A specially crafted .tar file can lead to a firmware downgrade. An attacker can perform a man-in-the-middle attack to trigger this vulnerability.
CWE
  • CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
GL-Inet GL-AXT1800 Affected: 4.7.0
Create a notification for this product.
Credits
Discovered by Lilith &gt;_&gt; of Cisco Talos.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-44018",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-11-24T15:48:47.598635Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-11-24T15:49:17.269Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-11-24T17:03:28.621Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "url": "https://www.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2025-2230"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "GL-AXT1800",
          "vendor": "GL-Inet",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "4.7.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Discovered by Lilith \u0026gt;_\u0026gt; of Cisco Talos."
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A firmware downgrade vulnerability exists in the OTA Update functionality of GL-Inet GL-AXT1800 4.7.0. A specially crafted .tar file can lead to a firmware downgrade. An attacker can perform a man-in-the-middle attack to trigger this vulnerability."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 8.3,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "CHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-295",
              "description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-11-24T15:11:02.641Z",
        "orgId": "b86d76f8-0f8a-4a96-a78d-d8abfc7fc29b",
        "shortName": "talos"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2025-2230",
          "url": "https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2025-2230"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "b86d76f8-0f8a-4a96-a78d-d8abfc7fc29b",
    "assignerShortName": "talos",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-44018",
    "datePublished": "2025-11-24T15:11:02.641Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-07-21T21:26:26.309Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-11-24T17:03:28.621Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2025-4575 (GCVE-0-2025-4575)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-05-22 13:36 – Updated: 2025-05-22 16:03
VLAI
Title
The x509 application adds trusted use instead of rejected use
Summary
Issue summary: Use of -addreject option with the openssl x509 application adds a trusted use instead of a rejected use for a certificate. Impact summary: If a user intends to make a trusted certificate rejected for a particular use it will be instead marked as trusted for that use. A copy & paste error during minor refactoring of the code introduced this issue in the OpenSSL 3.5 version. If, for example, a trusted CA certificate should be trusted only for the purpose of authenticating TLS servers but not for CMS signature verification and the CMS signature verification is intended to be marked as rejected with the -addreject option, the resulting CA certificate will be trusted for CMS signature verification purpose instead. Only users which use the trusted certificate format who use the openssl x509 command line application to add rejected uses are affected by this issue. The issues affecting only the command line application are considered to be Low severity. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. OpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are also not affected by this issue.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
OpenSSL OpenSSL Affected: 3.5.0 , < 3.5.1 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2025-05-22 14:00
Credits
Alexandr Sosedkin (Red Hat) Tomáš Mráz
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
              "baseScore": 6.5,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
              "integrityImpact": "LOW",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-4575",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-05-22T14:30:40.495897Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-05-22T14:32:40.965Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-05-22T16:03:42.330Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/05/22/1"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "OpenSSL",
          "vendor": "OpenSSL",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "3.5.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.5.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Alexandr Sosedkin (Red Hat)"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Tom\u00e1\u0161 Mr\u00e1z"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2025-05-22T14:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Issue summary: Use of -addreject option with the openssl x509 application adds\u003cbr\u003ea trusted use instead of a rejected use for a certificate.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: If a user intends to make a trusted certificate rejected for\u003cbr\u003ea particular use it will be instead marked as trusted for that use.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eA copy \u0026 paste error during minor refactoring of the code introduced this\u003cbr\u003eissue in the OpenSSL 3.5 version. If, for example, a trusted CA certificate\u003cbr\u003eshould be trusted only for the purpose of authenticating TLS servers but not\u003cbr\u003efor CMS signature verification and the CMS signature verification is intended\u003cbr\u003eto be marked as rejected with the -addreject option, the resulting CA\u003cbr\u003ecertificate will be trusted for CMS signature verification purpose instead.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOnly users which use the trusted certificate format who use the openssl x509\u003cbr\u003ecommand line application to add rejected uses are affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003eThe issues affecting only the command line application are considered to\u003cbr\u003ebe Low severity.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\u003cbr\u003eissue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are also not affected by this\u003cbr\u003eissue."
            }
          ],
          "value": "Issue summary: Use of -addreject option with the openssl x509 application adds\na trusted use instead of a rejected use for a certificate.\n\nImpact summary: If a user intends to make a trusted certificate rejected for\na particular use it will be instead marked as trusted for that use.\n\nA copy \u0026 paste error during minor refactoring of the code introduced this\nissue in the OpenSSL 3.5 version. If, for example, a trusted CA certificate\nshould be trusted only for the purpose of authenticating TLS servers but not\nfor CMS signature verification and the CMS signature verification is intended\nto be marked as rejected with the -addreject option, the resulting CA\ncertificate will be trusted for CMS signature verification purpose instead.\n\nOnly users which use the trusted certificate format who use the openssl x509\ncommand line application to add rejected uses are affected by this issue.\nThe issues affecting only the command line application are considered to\nbe Low severity.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this\nissue.\n\nOpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are also not affected by this\nissue."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "format": "other",
          "other": {
            "content": {
              "text": "Low"
            },
            "type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-295",
              "description": "CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-05-22T13:36:49.694Z",
        "orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
        "shortName": "openssl"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250522.txt"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.5.1 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e96d22446e633d117e6c9904cb15b4693e956eaa"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "The x509 application adds trusted use instead of rejected use",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
    "assignerShortName": "openssl",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-4575",
    "datePublished": "2025-05-22T13:36:49.694Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-05-12T12:08:11.215Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-05-22T16:03:42.330Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

CVE-2025-46551 (GCVE-0-2025-46551)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-05-07 16:12 – Updated: 2025-05-07 20:17
VLAI
Title
JRuby-OpenSSL has hostname verification disabled by default
Summary
JRuby-OpenSSL is an add-on gem for JRuby that emulates the Ruby OpenSSL native library. Starting in JRuby-OpenSSL version 0.12.1 and prior to version 0.15.4 (corresponding to JRuby versions starting in 9.3.4.0 prior to 9.4.12.1 and 10.0.0.0 prior to 10.0.0.1), when verifying SSL certificates, JRuby-OpenSSL does not verify that the hostname presented in the certificate matches the one the user tries to connect to. This means a man-in-the-middle could just present any valid cert for a completely different domain they own, and JRuby would accept the cert. Anybody using JRuby to make requests of external APIs, or scraping the web, that depends on https to connect securely. JRuby-OpenSSL version 0.15.4 contains a fix for the issue. This fix is included in JRuby versions 10.0.0.1 and 9.4.12.1.
CWE
  • CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
jruby jruby-openssl Affected: >= 0.12.1, < 0.15.4
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-46551",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-05-07T20:15:30.815503Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-05-07T20:17:32.055Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "exploit"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/jruby/jruby-openssl/security/advisories/GHSA-72qj-48g4-5xgx"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "jruby-openssl",
          "vendor": "jruby",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 0.12.1, \u003c 0.15.4"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "JRuby-OpenSSL is an add-on gem for JRuby that emulates the Ruby OpenSSL native library. Starting in JRuby-OpenSSL version 0.12.1 and prior to version 0.15.4 (corresponding to JRuby versions starting in 9.3.4.0 prior to 9.4.12.1 and 10.0.0.0 prior to 10.0.0.1), when verifying SSL certificates, JRuby-OpenSSL does not verify that the hostname presented in the certificate matches the one the user tries to connect to. This means a man-in-the-middle could just present any valid cert for a completely different domain they own, and JRuby would accept the cert. Anybody using JRuby to make requests of external APIs, or scraping the web, that depends on https to connect securely. JRuby-OpenSSL version 0.15.4 contains a fix for the issue. This fix is included in JRuby versions 10.0.0.1 and 9.4.12.1."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 5.7,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-295",
              "description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-05-07T16:13:58.555Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/jruby/jruby-openssl/security/advisories/GHSA-72qj-48g4-5xgx",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/jruby/jruby-openssl/security/advisories/GHSA-72qj-48g4-5xgx"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/jruby/jruby-openssl/commit/31a56d690ce9b8af47af09aaaf809081949ed285",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/jruby/jruby-openssl/commit/31a56d690ce9b8af47af09aaaf809081949ed285"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-72qj-48g4-5xgx",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "JRuby-OpenSSL has hostname verification disabled by default"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-46551",
    "datePublished": "2025-05-07T16:12:23.771Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-04-24T21:10:48.173Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-05-07T20:17:32.055Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

CVE-2025-46788 (GCVE-0-2025-46788)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-07-10 15:48 – Updated: 2025-07-10 20:17
VLAI
Title
Zoom Workplace for Linux - Improper Certificate Validation
Summary
Improper certificate validation in Zoom Workplace for Linux before version 6.4.13 may allow an unauthorized user to conduct an information disclosure via network access.
CWE
  • CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
Impacted products
Date Public
2025-07-08 12:00
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-46788",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-07-10T20:17:19.158259Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-07-10T20:17:26.324Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "platforms": [
            "Linux"
          ],
          "product": "Zoom Workplace for Linux",
          "vendor": "Zoom Communications Inc.",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "6.4.13",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2025-07-08T12:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Improper certificate validation in Zoom Workplace for Linux before version 6.4.13 may allow an unauthorized user to conduct an information disclosure via network access."
            }
          ],
          "value": "Improper certificate validation in Zoom Workplace for Linux before version 6.4.13 may allow an unauthorized user to conduct an information disclosure via network access."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.4,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-295",
              "description": "CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-07-10T15:48:04.711Z",
        "orgId": "99b9af0d-a833-4a5d-9e2f-8b1324f35351",
        "shortName": "Zoom"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://https://www.zoom.com/en/trust/security-bulletin/zsb-25023/"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Zoom Workplace for Linux - Improper Certificate Validation",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "99b9af0d-a833-4a5d-9e2f-8b1324f35351",
    "assignerShortName": "Zoom",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-46788",
    "datePublished": "2025-07-10T15:48:04.711Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-04-29T21:24:03.394Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-07-10T20:17:26.324Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

CVE-2025-48393 (GCVE-0-2025-48393)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-06 15:25 – Updated: 2026-02-09 05:35
VLAI
Summary
The server identity check mechanism for firmware upgrade performed via command shell is insecurely implemented potentially allowing an attacker to perform a Man-in-the-middle attack. This security issue has been fixed in the latest firmware version of Eaton G4 PDU which is available on the Eaton download center.
CWE
  • CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Eaton G4 PDU Affected: 0 , < 3.5.0 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2025-08-06 14:30
Credits
Harry Sintonen
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-48393",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-08-06T15:52:01.308012Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-08-06T15:52:52.971Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "G4 PDU",
          "vendor": "Eaton",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "3.5.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Harry Sintonen"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2025-08-06T14:30:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "The server identity check mechanism for firmware upgrade performed via command shell is insecurely implemented potentially allowing an attacker to perform a Man-in-the-middle attack. This security issue has been fixed in the latest firmware version of\u0026nbsp;Eaton G4 PDU which is available on the Eaton download center."
            }
          ],
          "value": "The server identity check mechanism for firmware upgrade performed via command shell is insecurely implemented potentially allowing an attacker to perform a Man-in-the-middle attack. This security issue has been fixed in the latest firmware version of\u00a0Eaton G4 PDU which is available on the Eaton download center."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
            "baseScore": 5.7,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-295",
              "description": "CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-02-09T05:35:45.734Z",
        "orgId": "63703b7d-23e2-41ef-94b3-a3c6333f7759",
        "shortName": "Eaton"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://www.eaton.com/content/dam/eaton/company/news-insights/cybersecurity/security-bulletins/etn-va-2025-1002.pdf"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "63703b7d-23e2-41ef-94b3-a3c6333f7759",
    "assignerShortName": "Eaton",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-48393",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-06T15:25:17.947Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-05-20T04:07:25.100Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-02-09T05:35:45.734Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2025-48802 (GCVE-0-2025-48802)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-07-08 16:57 – Updated: 2026-02-13 19:07
VLAI
Title
Windows SMB Server Spoofing Vulnerability
Summary
Improper certificate validation in Windows SMB allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
CWE
  • CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H2 Affected: 10.0.22621.0 , < 10.0.22621.5624 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H3 Affected: 10.0.22631.0 , < 10.0.22631.5624 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Microsoft Windows 11 Version 23H2 Affected: 10.0.22631.0 , < 10.0.22631.5624 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Microsoft Windows Server 2022 Affected: 10.0.20348.0 , < 10.0.20348.3932 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Microsoft Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation) Affected: 10.0.25398.0 , < 10.0.25398.1732 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2025-07-08 07:00
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-48802",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-07-09T13:53:45.456151Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-07-09T13:53:53.642Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "platforms": [
            "ARM64-based Systems",
            "x64-based Systems"
          ],
          "product": "Windows 11 version 22H2",
          "vendor": "Microsoft",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "10.0.22621.5624",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "10.0.22621.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "platforms": [
            "ARM64-based Systems"
          ],
          "product": "Windows 11 version 22H3",
          "vendor": "Microsoft",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "10.0.22631.5624",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "10.0.22631.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "platforms": [
            "x64-based Systems"
          ],
          "product": "Windows 11 Version 23H2",
          "vendor": "Microsoft",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "10.0.22631.5624",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "10.0.22631.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "platforms": [
            "x64-based Systems"
          ],
          "product": "Windows Server 2022",
          "vendor": "Microsoft",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "10.0.20348.3932",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "10.0.20348.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "platforms": [
            "x64-based Systems"
          ],
          "product": "Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)",
          "vendor": "Microsoft",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "10.0.25398.1732",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "10.0.25398.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "cpeApplicability": [
        {
          "nodes": [
            {
              "cpeMatch": [
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2022:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "versionEndExcluding": "10.0.20348.3932",
                  "versionStartIncluding": "10.0.20348.0",
                  "vulnerable": true
                },
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_11_22H2:*:*:*:*:*:*:arm64:*",
                  "versionEndExcluding": "10.0.22621.5624",
                  "versionStartIncluding": "10.0.22621.0",
                  "vulnerable": true
                },
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_11_23H2:*:*:*:*:*:*:arm64:*",
                  "versionEndExcluding": "10.0.22631.5624",
                  "versionStartIncluding": "10.0.22631.0",
                  "vulnerable": true
                },
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_11_23H2:*:*:*:*:*:*:x64:*",
                  "versionEndExcluding": "10.0.22631.5624",
                  "versionStartIncluding": "10.0.22631.0",
                  "vulnerable": true
                },
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_23h2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "versionEndExcluding": "10.0.25398.1732",
                  "versionStartIncluding": "10.0.25398.0",
                  "vulnerable": true
                }
              ],
              "negate": false,
              "operator": "OR"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2025-07-08T07:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en-US",
          "value": "Improper certificate validation in Windows SMB allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 6.5,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en-US",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-295",
              "description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
              "lang": "en-US",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-02-13T19:07:12.598Z",
        "orgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
        "shortName": "microsoft"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "Windows SMB Server Spoofing Vulnerability",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-48802"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Windows SMB Server Spoofing Vulnerability"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "f38d906d-7342-40ea-92c1-6c4a2c6478c8",
    "assignerShortName": "microsoft",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-48802",
    "datePublished": "2025-07-08T16:57:37.352Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-05-26T17:09:49.055Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-02-13T19:07:12.598Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

Mitigation

Phases: Architecture and Design, Implementation

Description:

  • Certificates should be carefully managed and checked to assure that data are encrypted with the intended owner's public key.
Mitigation

Phase: Implementation

Description:

  • If certificate pinning is being used, ensure that all relevant properties of the certificate are fully validated before the certificate is pinned, including the hostname.
CAPEC-459: Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate

An adversary exploits a weakness resulting from using a hashing algorithm with weak collision resistance to generate certificate signing requests (CSR) that contain collision blocks in their "to be signed" parts. The adversary submits one CSR to be signed by a trusted certificate authority then uses the signed blob to make a second certificate appear signed by said certificate authority. Due to the hash collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority.

CAPEC-475: Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation

An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.

Back to CWE stats page