CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.
CVE-2021-37698 (GCVE-0-2021-37698)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2021-08-19 13:55 – Updated: 2025-11-03 21:45
VLAI
Title
Missing TLS service certificate validation in GelfWriter, ElasticsearchWriter, InfluxdbWriter and Influxdb2Writer
Summary
Icinga is a monitoring system which checks the availability of network resources, notifies users of outages, and generates performance data for reporting. In versions 2.5.0 through 2.13.0, ElasticsearchWriter, GelfWriter, InfluxdbWriter and Influxdb2Writer do not verify the server's certificate despite a certificate authority being specified. Icinga 2 instances which connect to any of the mentioned time series databases (TSDBs) using TLS over a spoofable infrastructure should immediately upgrade to version 2.13.1, 2.12.6, or 2.11.11 to patch the issue. Such instances should also change the credentials (if any) used by the TSDB writer feature to authenticate against the TSDB. There are no workarounds aside from upgrading.
Severity
7.5 (High)
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/security/adviso… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/releases/tag/v2.11.11 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/releases/tag/v2.12.6 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/releases/tag/v2.13.1 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021… | mailing-listx_refsource_MLIST |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T21:45:10.788Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/security/advisories/GHSA-cxfm-8j5v-5qr2"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/releases/tag/v2.11.11"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/releases/tag/v2.12.6"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/releases/tag/v2.13.1"
},
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20211110 [SECURITY] [DLA 2816-1] icinga2 security update",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11/msg00010.html"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/11/msg00010.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "icinga2",
"vendor": "Icinga",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 2.5.0, \u003c= 2.13.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Icinga is a monitoring system which checks the availability of network resources, notifies users of outages, and generates performance data for reporting. In versions 2.5.0 through 2.13.0, ElasticsearchWriter, GelfWriter, InfluxdbWriter and Influxdb2Writer do not verify the server\u0027s certificate despite a certificate authority being specified. Icinga 2 instances which connect to any of the mentioned time series databases (TSDBs) using TLS over a spoofable infrastructure should immediately upgrade to version 2.13.1, 2.12.6, or 2.11.11 to patch the issue. Such instances should also change the credentials (if any) used by the TSDB writer feature to authenticate against the TSDB. There are no workarounds aside from upgrading."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2021-11-10T23:06:10.000Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/security/advisories/GHSA-cxfm-8j5v-5qr2"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/releases/tag/v2.11.11"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/releases/tag/v2.12.6"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/releases/tag/v2.13.1"
},
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20211110 [SECURITY] [DLA 2816-1] icinga2 security update",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_MLIST"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11/msg00010.html"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-cxfm-8j5v-5qr2",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Missing TLS service certificate validation in GelfWriter, ElasticsearchWriter, InfluxdbWriter and Influxdb2Writer",
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
"ID": "CVE-2021-37698",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "Missing TLS service certificate validation in GelfWriter, ElasticsearchWriter, InfluxdbWriter and Influxdb2Writer"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "icinga2",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "\u003e= 2.5.0, \u003c= 2.13.0"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Icinga"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Icinga is a monitoring system which checks the availability of network resources, notifies users of outages, and generates performance data for reporting. In versions 2.5.0 through 2.13.0, ElasticsearchWriter, GelfWriter, InfluxdbWriter and Influxdb2Writer do not verify the server\u0027s certificate despite a certificate authority being specified. Icinga 2 instances which connect to any of the mentioned time series databases (TSDBs) using TLS over a spoofable infrastructure should immediately upgrade to version 2.13.1, 2.12.6, or 2.11.11 to patch the issue. Such instances should also change the credentials (if any) used by the TSDB writer feature to authenticate against the TSDB. There are no workarounds aside from upgrading."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/security/advisories/GHSA-cxfm-8j5v-5qr2",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/security/advisories/GHSA-cxfm-8j5v-5qr2"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/releases/tag/v2.11.11",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/releases/tag/v2.11.11"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/releases/tag/v2.12.6",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/releases/tag/v2.12.6"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/releases/tag/v2.13.1",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/releases/tag/v2.13.1"
},
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20211110 [SECURITY] [DLA 2816-1] icinga2 security update",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11/msg00010.html"
}
]
},
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-cxfm-8j5v-5qr2",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2021-37698",
"datePublished": "2021-08-19T13:55:10.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2021-07-29T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T21:45:10.788Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2021-3898 (GCVE-0-2021-3898)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-04-22 20:30 – Updated: 2024-08-03 17:09
VLAI
Summary
Versions of Motorola Ready For and Motorola Device Help Android applications prior to 2021-04-08 do not properly verify the server certificate which could lead to the communication channel being accessible by an attacker.
Severity
6.8 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://support.lenovo.com/us/en/product_security… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motorola | Device Help Android App |
Affected:
various
|
|
| Motorola | Ready For Android App |
Affected:
various
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T17:09:09.607Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://support.lenovo.com/us/en/product_security/LEN-58311"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Device Help Android App",
"vendor": "Motorola",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "various"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Ready For Android App",
"vendor": "Motorola",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "various"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Versions of Motorola Ready For and Motorola Device Help Android applications prior to 2021-04-08 do not properly verify the server certificate which could lead to the communication channel being accessible by an attacker."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-04-22T20:30:35.000Z",
"orgId": "da227ddf-6e25-4b41-b023-0f976dcaca4b",
"shortName": "lenovo"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://support.lenovo.com/us/en/product_security/LEN-58311"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Update to latest versions of Motorola Ready For and Motorola Device Help Android applications."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "LEN-58311",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9"
},
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "psirt@lenovo.com",
"ID": "CVE-2021-3898",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Device Help Android App",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "=",
"version_value": "various"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Motorola"
},
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Ready For Android App",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "=",
"version_value": "various"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Motorola"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Versions of Motorola Ready For and Motorola Device Help Android applications prior to 2021-04-08 do not properly verify the server certificate which could lead to the communication channel being accessible by an attacker."
}
]
},
"generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9"
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://support.lenovo.com/us/en/product_security/LEN-58311",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://support.lenovo.com/us/en/product_security/LEN-58311"
}
]
},
"solution": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Update to latest versions of Motorola Ready For and Motorola Device Help Android applications."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "LEN-58311",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "da227ddf-6e25-4b41-b023-0f976dcaca4b",
"assignerShortName": "lenovo",
"cveId": "CVE-2021-3898",
"datePublished": "2022-04-22T20:30:35.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2021-10-22T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T17:09:09.607Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2021-40713 (GCVE-0-2021-40713)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2021-09-27 15:43 – Updated: 2025-04-23 19:27
VLAI
Title
Adobe Experience Manager Improper Certificate Validation Could Lead to Man In The Middle Attack
Summary
Adobe Experience Manager version 6.5.9.0 (and earlier) is affected by a improper certificate validation vulnerability in the cold storage component. If an attacker can achieve a man in the middle when the cold server establishes a new certificate, they would be able to harvest sensitive information.
Severity
5.9 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295)
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experie… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adobe | Experience Manager |
Affected:
unspecified , ≤ 6.5.9.0
(custom)
Affected: unspecified , ≤ None (custom) |
Date Public
2021-09-14 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T02:51:06.645Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb21-82.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2021-40713",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T13:11:06.277543Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T19:27:22.676Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Experience Manager",
"vendor": "Adobe",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.9.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "None",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2021-09-14T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Adobe Experience Manager version 6.5.9.0 (and earlier) is affected by a improper certificate validation vulnerability in the cold storage component. If an attacker can achieve a man in the middle when the cold server establishes a new certificate, they would be able to harvest sensitive information."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2021-09-27T15:43:07.000Z",
"orgId": "078d4453-3bcd-4900-85e6-15281da43538",
"shortName": "adobe"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb21-82.html"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Adobe Experience Manager Improper Certificate Validation Could Lead to Man In The Middle Attack",
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "psirt@adobe.com",
"DATE_PUBLIC": "2021-09-14T23:00:00.000Z",
"ID": "CVE-2021-40713",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "Adobe Experience Manager Improper Certificate Validation Could Lead to Man In The Middle Attack"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Experience Manager",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c=",
"version_value": "6.5.9.0"
},
{
"version_affected": "\u003c=",
"version_value": "None"
},
{
"version_affected": "\u003c=",
"version_value": "None"
},
{
"version_affected": "\u003c=",
"version_value": "None"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Adobe"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Adobe Experience Manager version 6.5.9.0 (and earlier) is affected by a improper certificate validation vulnerability in the cold storage component. If an attacker can achieve a man in the middle when the cold server establishes a new certificate, they would be able to harvest sensitive information."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "High",
"attackVector": "Network",
"availabilityImpact": "None",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "Medium",
"confidentialityImpact": "High",
"integrityImpact": "None",
"privilegesRequired": "None",
"scope": "Unchanged",
"userInteraction": "None",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295)"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb21-82.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb21-82.html"
}
]
},
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "078d4453-3bcd-4900-85e6-15281da43538",
"assignerShortName": "adobe",
"cveId": "CVE-2021-40713",
"datePublished": "2021-09-27T15:43:07.324Z",
"dateReserved": "2021-09-08T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T19:27:22.676Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2021-42027 (GCVE-0-2021-42027)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2021-12-14 12:06 – Updated: 2024-08-04 03:22
VLAI
Summary
A vulnerability has been identified in SINUMERIK Edge (All versions < V3.2). The affected software does not properly validate the server certificate when initiating a TLS connection. This could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between the client and the intended server.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/s… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Siemens | SINUMERIK Edge |
Affected:
All versions < V3.2
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T03:22:25.641Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-523250.pdf"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "SINUMERIK Edge",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All versions \u003c V3.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability has been identified in SINUMERIK Edge (All versions \u003c V3.2). The affected software does not properly validate the server certificate when initiating a TLS connection. This could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between the client and the intended server."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2021-12-14T12:06:39.000Z",
"orgId": "cec7a2ec-15b4-4faf-bd53-b40f371f3a77",
"shortName": "siemens"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-523250.pdf"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "productcert@siemens.com",
"ID": "CVE-2021-42027",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "SINUMERIK Edge",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "All versions \u003c V3.2"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Siemens"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "A vulnerability has been identified in SINUMERIK Edge (All versions \u003c V3.2). The affected software does not properly validate the server certificate when initiating a TLS connection. This could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between the client and the intended server."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-523250.pdf",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-523250.pdf"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "cec7a2ec-15b4-4faf-bd53-b40f371f3a77",
"assignerShortName": "siemens",
"cveId": "CVE-2021-42027",
"datePublished": "2021-12-14T12:06:39.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2021-10-06T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T03:22:25.641Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2021-44531 (GCVE-0-2021-44531)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-02-24 18:27 – Updated: 2025-04-30 22:24
VLAI
Summary
Accepting arbitrary Subject Alternative Name (SAN) types, unless a PKI is specifically defined to use a particular SAN type, can result in bypassing name-constrained intermediates. Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 was accepting URI SAN types, which PKIs are often not defined to use. Additionally, when a protocol allows URI SANs, Node.js did not match the URI correctly.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this disable the URI SAN type when checking a certificate against a hostname. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295)
Assigner
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-2022032… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_DEBIAN |
| https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NodeJS | Node |
Affected:
4.0 , < 4.*
(semver)
Affected: 5.0 , < 5.* (semver) Affected: 6.0 , < 6.* (semver) Affected: 7.0 , < 7.* (semver) Affected: 8.0 , < 8.* (semver) Affected: 9.0 , < 9.* (semver) Affected: 10.0 , < 10.* (semver) Affected: 11.0 , < 11.* (semver) Affected: 12.0 , < 12.22.9 (semver) Affected: 13.0 , < 13.* (semver) Affected: 14.0 , < 14.18.3 (semver) Affected: 15.0 , < 15.* (semver) Affected: 16.0 , < 16.13.2 (semver) Affected: 17.0 , < 17.3.1 (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T04:25:16.807Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022-security-releases/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220325-0007/"
},
{
"name": "DSA-5170",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_DEBIAN",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Node",
"vendor": "NodeJS",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "7.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "8.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "9.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "10.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "11.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "11.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "12.22.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "12.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "13.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "13.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "14.18.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "14.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "15.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "15.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "16.13.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "17.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Accepting arbitrary Subject Alternative Name (SAN) types, unless a PKI is specifically defined to use a particular SAN type, can result in bypassing name-constrained intermediates. Node.js \u003c 12.22.9, \u003c 14.18.3, \u003c 16.13.2, and \u003c 17.3.1 was accepting URI SAN types, which PKIs are often not defined to use. Additionally, when a protocol allows URI SANs, Node.js did not match the URI correctly.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this disable the URI SAN type when checking a certificate against a hostname. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-30T22:24:39.015Z",
"orgId": "36234546-b8fa-4601-9d6f-f4e334aa8ea1",
"shortName": "hackerone"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022-security-releases/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220325-0007/"
},
{
"name": "DSA-5170",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_DEBIAN"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "support@hackerone.com",
"ID": "CVE-2021-44531",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "https://github.com/nodejs/node",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "Fixed in 12.22.9, 14.18.3, 16.13.2, 17.3.1"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Accepting arbitrary Subject Alternative Name (SAN) types, unless a PKI is specifically defined to use a particular SAN type, can result in bypassing name-constrained intermediates. Node.js \u003c 12.22.9, \u003c 14.18.3, \u003c 16.13.2, and \u003c 17.3.1 was accepting URI SAN types, which PKIs are often not defined to use. Additionally, when a protocol allows URI SANs, Node.js did not match the URI correctly.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this disable the URI SAN type when checking a certificate against a hostname. This behavior can be reverted through the --security-revert command-line option."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295)"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694"
},
{
"name": "https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022-security-releases/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022-security-releases/"
},
{
"name": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html"
},
{
"name": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220325-0007/",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220325-0007/"
},
{
"name": "DSA-5170",
"refsource": "DEBIAN",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170"
},
{
"name": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "36234546-b8fa-4601-9d6f-f4e334aa8ea1",
"assignerShortName": "hackerone",
"cveId": "CVE-2021-44531",
"datePublished": "2022-02-24T18:27:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2021-12-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-30T22:24:39.015Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2021-44533 (GCVE-0-2021-44533)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-02-24 18:27 – Updated: 2025-04-30 22:24
VLAI
Summary
Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 did not handle multi-value Relative Distinguished Names correctly. Attackers could craft certificate subjects containing a single-value Relative Distinguished Name that would be interpreted as a multi-value Relative Distinguished Name, for example, in order to inject a Common Name that would allow bypassing the certificate subject verification.Affected versions of Node.js that do not accept multi-value Relative Distinguished Names and are thus not vulnerable to such attacks themselves. However, third-party code that uses node's ambiguous presentation of certificate subjects may be vulnerable.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295)
Assigner
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-2022032… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_DEBIAN |
| https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NodeJS | Node |
Affected:
4.0 , < 4.*
(semver)
Affected: 5.0 , < 5.* (semver) Affected: 6.0 , < 6.* (semver) Affected: 7.0 , < 7.* (semver) Affected: 8.0 , < 8.* (semver) Affected: 9.0 , < 9.* (semver) Affected: 10.0 , < 10.* (semver) Affected: 11.0 , < 11.* (semver) Affected: 12.0 , < 12.22.9 (semver) Affected: 13.0 , < 13.* (semver) Affected: 14.0 , < 14.18.3 (semver) Affected: 15.0 , < 15.* (semver) Affected: 16.0 , < 16.13.2 (semver) Affected: 17.0 , < 17.3.1 (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T04:25:16.822Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022-security-releases/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220325-0007/"
},
{
"name": "DSA-5170",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_DEBIAN",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Node",
"vendor": "NodeJS",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "7.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "8.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "9.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "10.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "11.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "11.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "12.22.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "12.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "13.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "13.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "14.18.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "14.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "15.*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "15.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "16.13.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "17.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Node.js \u003c 12.22.9, \u003c 14.18.3, \u003c 16.13.2, and \u003c 17.3.1 did not handle multi-value Relative Distinguished Names correctly. Attackers could craft certificate subjects containing a single-value Relative Distinguished Name that would be interpreted as a multi-value Relative Distinguished Name, for example, in order to inject a Common Name that would allow bypassing the certificate subject verification.Affected versions of Node.js that do not accept multi-value Relative Distinguished Names and are thus not vulnerable to such attacks themselves. However, third-party code that uses node\u0027s ambiguous presentation of certificate subjects may be vulnerable."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-30T22:24:40.708Z",
"orgId": "36234546-b8fa-4601-9d6f-f4e334aa8ea1",
"shortName": "hackerone"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022-security-releases/"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220325-0007/"
},
{
"name": "DSA-5170",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_DEBIAN"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "support@hackerone.com",
"ID": "CVE-2021-44533",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "https://github.com/nodejs/node",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "Fixed in 12.22.9, 14.18.3, 16.13.2, 17.3.1"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Node.js \u003c 12.22.9, \u003c 14.18.3, \u003c 16.13.2, and \u003c 17.3.1 did not handle multi-value Relative Distinguished Names correctly. Attackers could craft certificate subjects containing a single-value Relative Distinguished Name that would be interpreted as a multi-value Relative Distinguished Name, for example, in order to inject a Common Name that would allow bypassing the certificate subject verification.Affected versions of Node.js that do not accept multi-value Relative Distinguished Names and are thus not vulnerable to such attacks themselves. However, third-party code that uses node\u0027s ambiguous presentation of certificate subjects may be vulnerable."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295)"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694"
},
{
"name": "https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022-security-releases/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022-security-releases/"
},
{
"name": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html"
},
{
"name": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220325-0007/",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220325-0007/"
},
{
"name": "DSA-5170",
"refsource": "DEBIAN",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170"
},
{
"name": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "36234546-b8fa-4601-9d6f-f4e334aa8ea1",
"assignerShortName": "hackerone",
"cveId": "CVE-2021-44533",
"datePublished": "2022-02-24T18:27:02.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2021-12-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-30T22:24:40.708Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2021-44549 (GCVE-0-2021-44549)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2021-12-14 15:15 – Updated: 2024-08-04 04:25
VLAI
Title
SMTPS server hostname not checked when making TLS connection to SMTPS server
Summary
Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail provides a simple layer on top of JavaMail/Jakarta Mail for OSGi to send mails via SMTPS. To reduce the risk of "man in the middle" attacks additional server identity checks must be performed when accessing mail servers. For compatibility reasons these additional checks are disabled by default in JavaMail/Jakarta Mail. The SimpleMailService in Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 1.0 lacks an option to enable these checks for the shared mail session. A user could enable these checks nevertheless by accessing the session via the message created by SimpleMessageBuilder and setting the property mail.smtps.ssl.checkserveridentity to true. Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 2.0 adds support for enabling server identity checks and these checks are enabled by default. - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/SSLNOTES.txt - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/api/com/sun/mail/smtp/package-summary.html - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/mail/issues/429
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation, CWE-297: Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://lists.apache.org/thread/l8p9h2bqvkj6rhv4w… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail |
Affected:
Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 1.0.0 1.0.0
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T04:25:16.815Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/l8p9h2bqvkj6rhv4w8kzctb817415b7f"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 1.0.0 1.0.0"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The issue was reported by Michael Lescisin."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail provides a simple layer on top of JavaMail/Jakarta Mail for OSGi to send mails via SMTPS. To reduce the risk of \"man in the middle\" attacks additional server identity checks must be performed when accessing mail servers. For compatibility reasons these additional checks are disabled by default in JavaMail/Jakarta Mail. The SimpleMailService in Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 1.0 lacks an option to enable these checks for the shared mail session. A user could enable these checks nevertheless by accessing the session via the message created by SimpleMessageBuilder and setting the property mail.smtps.ssl.checkserveridentity to true. Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 2.0 adds support for enabling server identity checks and these checks are enabled by default. - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/SSLNOTES.txt - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/api/com/sun/mail/smtp/package-summary.html - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/mail/issues/429"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"other": "low"
},
"type": "unknown"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation, CWE-297: Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2021-12-14T15:15:10.000Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/l8p9h2bqvkj6rhv4w8kzctb817415b7f"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "SMTPS server hostname not checked when making TLS connection to SMTPS server",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Set the property mail.smtps.ssl.checkserveridentity to true via message\u0027s session."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9"
},
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security@apache.org",
"ID": "CVE-2021-44549",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "SMTPS server hostname not checked when making TLS connection to SMTPS server"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "=",
"version_name": "Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 1.0.0",
"version_value": "1.0.0"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Apache Software Foundation"
}
]
}
},
"credit": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The issue was reported by Michael Lescisin."
}
],
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail provides a simple layer on top of JavaMail/Jakarta Mail for OSGi to send mails via SMTPS. To reduce the risk of \"man in the middle\" attacks additional server identity checks must be performed when accessing mail servers. For compatibility reasons these additional checks are disabled by default in JavaMail/Jakarta Mail. The SimpleMailService in Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 1.0 lacks an option to enable these checks for the shared mail session. A user could enable these checks nevertheless by accessing the session via the message created by SimpleMessageBuilder and setting the property mail.smtps.ssl.checkserveridentity to true. Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 2.0 adds support for enabling server identity checks and these checks are enabled by default. - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/SSLNOTES.txt - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/api/com/sun/mail/smtp/package-summary.html - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/mail/issues/429"
}
]
},
"generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9"
},
"impact": [
{
"other": "low"
}
],
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation, CWE-297: Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/l8p9h2bqvkj6rhv4w8kzctb817415b7f",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/l8p9h2bqvkj6rhv4w8kzctb817415b7f"
}
]
},
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"work_around": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Set the property mail.smtps.ssl.checkserveridentity to true via message\u0027s session."
}
]
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2021-44549",
"datePublished": "2021-12-14T15:15:10.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2021-12-04T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T04:25:16.815Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2022-0759 (GCVE-0-2022-0759)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-03-25 18:03 – Updated: 2024-08-02 23:40
VLAI
Summary
A flaw was found in all versions of kubeclient up to (but not including) v4.9.3, the Ruby client for Kubernetes REST API, in the way it parsed kubeconfig files. When the kubeconfig file does not configure custom CA to verify certs, kubeclient ends up accepting any certificate (it wrongly returns VERIFY_NONE). Ruby applications that leverage kubeclient to parse kubeconfig files are susceptible to Man-in-the-middle attacks (MITM).
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/ManageIQ/kubeclient/issues/554 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/ManageIQ/kubeclient/issues/555 | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | kubeclient |
Affected:
4.9.3
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T23:40:03.643Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ManageIQ/kubeclient/issues/554"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ManageIQ/kubeclient/issues/555"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "kubeclient",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.9.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in all versions of kubeclient up to (but not including) v4.9.3, the Ruby client for Kubernetes REST API, in the way it parsed kubeconfig files. When the kubeconfig file does not configure custom CA to verify certs, kubeclient ends up accepting any certificate (it wrongly returns VERIFY_NONE). Ruby applications that leverage kubeclient to parse kubeconfig files are susceptible to Man-in-the-middle attacks (MITM)."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-03-25T18:03:10.000Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ManageIQ/kubeclient/issues/554"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ManageIQ/kubeclient/issues/555"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2022-0759",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "kubeclient",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "4.9.3"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "A flaw was found in all versions of kubeclient up to (but not including) v4.9.3, the Ruby client for Kubernetes REST API, in the way it parsed kubeconfig files. When the kubeconfig file does not configure custom CA to verify certs, kubeclient ends up accepting any certificate (it wrongly returns VERIFY_NONE). Ruby applications that leverage kubeclient to parse kubeconfig files are susceptible to Man-in-the-middle attacks (MITM)."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-295"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/ManageIQ/kubeclient/issues/554",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/ManageIQ/kubeclient/issues/554"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/ManageIQ/kubeclient/issues/555",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/ManageIQ/kubeclient/issues/555"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-0759",
"datePublished": "2022-03-25T18:03:10.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-02-24T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T23:40:03.643Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2022-1632 (GCVE-0-2022-1632)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-09-01 00:00 – Updated: 2024-08-03 00:10
VLAI
Summary
An Improper Certificate Validation attack was found in Openshift. A re-encrypt Route with destinationCACertificate explicitly set to the default serviceCA skips internal Service TLS certificate validation. This flaw allows an attacker to exploit an invalid certificate, resulting in a loss of confidentiality.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
Assigner
References
1 reference
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T00:10:03.751Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081181"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Openshift",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.8.17"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An Improper Certificate Validation attack was found in Openshift. A re-encrypt Route with destinationCACertificate explicitly set to the default serviceCA skips internal Service TLS certificate validation. This flaw allows an attacker to exploit an invalid certificate, resulting in a loss of confidentiality."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-12-08T00:00:00.000Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081181"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-1632",
"datePublished": "2022-09-01T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-05-09T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T00:10:03.751Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2022-20814 (GCVE-0-2022-20814)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-11-15 15:32 – Updated: 2024-11-15 21:15
VLAI
Title
Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence VCS Improper Certificate Validation Vulnerability
Summary
A vulnerability in the certificate validation of Cisco Expressway-C and Cisco TelePresence VCS could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data. The vulnerability is due to a lack of validation of the SSL server certificate that an affected device receives when it establishes a connection to a Cisco Unified Communications Manager device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using a man-in-the-middle technique to intercept the traffic between the devices, and then using a self-signed certificate to impersonate the endpoint. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view the intercepted traffic in clear text or alter the contents of the traffic.
Note: Cisco Expressway-E is not affected by this vulnerability.Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.
Severity
7.4 (High)
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco | Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) Expressway |
Affected:
X8.11.2
Affected: X8.6 Affected: X8.11.3 Affected: X8.2.2 Affected: X8.8.3 Affected: X8.11.0 Affected: X12.5.2 Affected: X8.1.1 Affected: X8.9 Affected: X12.5.1 Affected: X12.5.6 Affected: X8.7.3 Affected: X12.6.0 Affected: X8.11.1 Affected: X8.5 Affected: X8.9.1 Affected: X8.10.2 Affected: X8.8.2 Affected: X8.5.3 Affected: X8.1 Affected: X8.9.2 Affected: X8.11.4 Affected: X12.5.4 Affected: X8.8.1 Affected: X8.2.1 Affected: X8.5.1 Affected: X8.6.1 Affected: X8.1.2 Affected: X8.8 Affected: X8.10.0 Affected: X12.5.3 Affected: X8.10.1 Affected: X12.5.7 Affected: X8.10.3 Affected: X8.7.1 Affected: X8.2 Affected: X12.5.8 Affected: X8.7 Affected: X8.5.2 Affected: X12.5.9 Affected: X12.5.0 Affected: X8.10.4 Affected: X8.7.2 Affected: X12.5.5 Affected: X12.6.1 Affected: X12.6.2 Affected: X12.6.3 Affected: X12.6.4 Affected: X12.7.0 Affected: X12.7.1 Affected: X14.0.0 Affected: X14.0.1 Affected: X14.0.2 Affected: X14.0.3 Affected: X14.0.4 Affected: X14.0.5 Affected: X14.0.6 Affected: X14.0.7 Affected: X14.0.8 Affected: X14.0.9 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:cisco:telepresence_video_communication_server:-:*:*:*:expressway:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "telepresence_video_communication_server",
"vendor": "cisco",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "14.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-20814",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-11-15T21:14:32.828966Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-15T21:15:35.408Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) Expressway",
"vendor": "Cisco",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.11.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.11.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.2.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.8.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.11.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X12.5.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.1.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.9"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X12.5.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X12.5.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.7.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X12.6.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.11.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.9.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.10.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.8.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.5.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.9.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.11.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X12.5.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.8.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.2.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.5.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.6.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.1.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.10.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X12.5.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.10.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X12.5.7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.10.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.7.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X12.5.8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.5.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X12.5.9"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X12.5.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.10.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X8.7.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X12.5.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X12.6.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X12.6.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X12.6.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X12.6.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X12.7.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X12.7.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X14.0.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X14.0.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X14.0.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X14.0.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X14.0.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X14.0.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X14.0.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X14.0.7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X14.0.8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "X14.0.9"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability in the certificate validation of Cisco\u0026nbsp;Expressway-C and Cisco\u0026nbsp;TelePresence VCS could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;The vulnerability is due to a lack of validation of the SSL server certificate that an affected device receives when it establishes a connection to a Cisco\u0026nbsp;Unified Communications Manager device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using a man-in-the-middle technique to intercept the traffic between the devices, and then using a self-signed certificate to impersonate the endpoint. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view the intercepted traffic in clear text or alter the contents of the traffic.\r\nNote: Cisco\u0026nbsp;Expressway-E is not affected by this vulnerability.Cisco\u0026nbsp;has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Cisco\u00a0PSIRT is not aware of any public announcements or malicious use of the vulnerability that is described in this advisory."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "cvssV3_1"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "cwe"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-15T15:32:47.058Z",
"orgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"shortName": "cisco"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "cisco-sa-expressway-csrf-sqpsSfY6",
"url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-expressway-csrf-sqpsSfY6"
},
{
"name": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-iosxr-bng-Gmg5Gxt\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis advisory is part of the September 2022 release of the Cisco\u0026nbsp;IOS XR Software Security Advisory Bundled Publication. For a complete list of the advisories and links to them, see \u003ca href=\"https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/viewErp.x?alertId=ERP-74840\"\u003eCisco\u0026nbsp;Event Response: September 2022 Semiannual Cisco\u0026nbsp;IOS XR Software Security Advisory Bundled Publication",
"url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-iosxr-bng-Gmg5Gxt"
},
{
"name": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-ncs4k-tl1-GNnLwC6\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis advisory is part of the September 2022 release of the Cisco\u0026nbsp;IOS XR Software Security Advisory Bundled Publication. For a complete list of the advisories and links to them, see \u003ca href=\"https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/viewErp.x?alertId=ERP-74840\"\u003eCisco\u0026nbsp;Event Response: September 2022 Semiannual Cisco\u0026nbsp;IOS XR Software Security Advisory Bundled Publication",
"url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-ncs4k-tl1-GNnLwC6"
},
{
"name": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-xr-cdp-wnALzvT2\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis advisory is part of the September 2022 release of the Cisco\u0026nbsp;IOS XR Software Security Advisory Bundled Publication. For a complete list of the advisories and links to them, see \u003ca href=\"https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/viewErp.x?alertId=ERP-74840\"\u003eCisco\u0026nbsp;Event Response: September 2022 Semiannual Cisco\u0026nbsp;IOS XR Software Security Advisory Bundled Publication",
"url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-xr-cdp-wnALzvT2"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "cisco-sa-expressway-csrf-sqpsSfY6",
"defects": [
"CSCwa25108"
],
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence VCS Improper Certificate Validation Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"assignerShortName": "cisco",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-20814",
"datePublished": "2024-11-15T15:32:47.058Z",
"dateReserved": "2021-11-02T13:28:29.175Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-15T21:15:35.408Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Mitigation
Phases: Architecture and Design, Implementation
Description:
- Certificates should be carefully managed and checked to assure that data are encrypted with the intended owner's public key.
Mitigation
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- If certificate pinning is being used, ensure that all relevant properties of the certificate are fully validated before the certificate is pinned, including the hostname.
CAPEC-459: Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate
An adversary exploits a weakness resulting from using a hashing algorithm with weak collision resistance to generate certificate signing requests (CSR) that contain collision blocks in their "to be signed" parts. The adversary submits one CSR to be signed by a trusted certificate authority then uses the signed blob to make a second certificate appear signed by said certificate authority. Due to the hash collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority.
CAPEC-475: Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation
An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.