CWE-862
Weakness Allowed-with-ReviewMissing Authorization
Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
Dimensions
- Behavior-Property: Missing
- Behavior-Type: Authorization
Mapping guidance
This CWE entry is a Class and might have Base-level children that would be more appropriate
Examine children of this entry to see if there is a better fit
Relationships and members
Modes of introduction
OMISSION: This weakness is caused by missing a security tactic during the architecture and design phase.
Authorization weaknesses may arise when a single-user application is ported to a multi-user environment.
A developer may introduce authorization weaknesses because of a lack of understanding about the underlying technologies. For example, a developer may assume that attackers cannot modify certain inputs such as headers or cookies.
Detection methods
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis is useful for detecting commonly-used idioms for authorization. A tool may be able to analyze related configuration files, such as .htaccess in Apache web servers, or detect the usage of commonly-used authorization libraries.
Generally, automated static analysis tools have difficulty detecting custom authorization schemes. In addition, the software's design may include some functionality that is accessible to any user and does not require an authorization check; an automated technique that detects the absence of authorization may report false positives.
Effectiveness: Limited
Automated Dynamic Analysis
Automated dynamic analysis may find many or all possible interfaces that do not require authorization, but manual analysis is required to determine if the lack of authorization violates business logic.
Manual Analysis
This weakness can be detected using tools and techniques that require manual (human) analysis, such as penetration testing, threat modeling, and interactive tools that allow the tester to record and modify an active session.
Specifically, manual static analysis is useful for evaluating the correctness of custom authorization mechanisms.
Effectiveness: Moderate
These may be more effective than strictly automated techniques. This is especially the case with weaknesses that are related to design and business rules. However, manual efforts might not achieve desired code coverage within limited time constraints.
Manual Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Binary / Bytecode disassembler - then use manual analysis for vulnerabilities & anomalies
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Dynamic Analysis with Automated Results Interpretation
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Web Application Scanner
Web Services Scanner
Database Scanners
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Host Application Interface Scanner
Fuzz Tester
Framework-based Fuzzer
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Manual Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Focused Manual Spotcheck - Focused manual analysis of source
Manual Source Code Review (not inspections)
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Automated Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Cost effective for partial coverage:
Source code Weakness Analyzer
Context-configured Source Code Weakness Analyzer
Effectiveness: SOAR Partial
Architecture or Design Review
According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:
Highly cost effective:
Inspection (IEEE 1028 standard) (can apply to requirements, design, source code, etc.)
Formal Methods / Correct-By-Construction
Effectiveness: High
Notes
Terminology
Assuming a user with a given identity, authorization is the process of determining whether that user can access a given resource, based on the user's privileges and any permissions or other access-control specifications that apply to the resource.
Content history
Suggested mappings to ISA/IEC 62443.
Provided diagram to improve CWE usability
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships
updated Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples, References, Relationships
updated Potential_Mitigations
updated Relationships
updated Detection_Factors
updated Relationships
updated Applicable_Platforms, Modes_of_Introduction, References, Relationships
updated References
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Alternate_Terms, Observed_Examples
updated Observed_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Observed_Examples
updated Description, Potential_Mitigations
updated References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Mapping_Notes, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Common_Consequences, Description, Diagram, Relationships, Terminology_Notes
updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, Observed_Examples, References
updated Applicable_Platforms, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities
updated Applicable_Platforms, Observed_Examples, Relationships
updated Applicable_Platforms, Dimensions, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
19894 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-C82G-962C-CX6H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-12-07 03:30 – Updated: 2023-12-07 03:30The System Dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the sd_constants() function hooked via an AJAX action in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to retrieve sensitive information such as database credentials.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-5710"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-12-07T02:15:06Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The System Dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the sd_constants() function hooked via an AJAX action in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to retrieve sensitive information such as database credentials.",
"id": "GHSA-c82g-962c-cx6h",
"modified": "2023-12-07T03:30:32Z",
"published": "2023-12-07T03:30:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-5710"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/system-dashboard/tags/2.8.7/admin/class-system-dashboard-admin.php#L7930"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/system-dashboard/tags/2.8.8/admin/class-system-dashboard-admin.php#L7951"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/f170379e-e833-42e0-96fd-1e1722a8331c?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-C82J-RG2R-F495
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-08 15:31 – Updated: 2026-09-08 15:31A Missing Authorization vulnerability in Ivanti Neurons for ITSM before 2026.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-12646"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-08T15:18:40Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "A Missing Authorization vulnerability in Ivanti Neurons for ITSM before 2026.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server.",
"id": "GHSA-c82j-rg2r-f495",
"modified": "2026-09-08T15:31:56Z",
"published": "2026-09-08T15:31:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-12646"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hub.ivanti.com/s/article/Security-Advisory-Ivanti-Neurons-for-ITSM-Multiple-CVEs?language=en_US"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-C82W-WXQ7-HWV4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-19 18:31 – Updated: 2026-07-20 15:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ip6: vti: Use ip6_tnl.net in vti6_siocdevprivate().
After patch 1/2 in this series, vti6_update() unlinks and relinks the tunnel through t->net. vti6_siocdevprivate() still uses dev_net(dev) for the collision lookup. For a tunnel moved through IFLA_NET_NS_FD, dev_net(dev) is the new netns, not t->net.
SIOCCHGTUNNEL on a migrated tunnel then runs:
net = dev_net(dev) /* migrated netns / t = vti6_locate(net, &p1, false) / misses target in t->net / ... t = netdev_priv(dev) vti6_update(t, &p1, false) / mutates t->net's hash */
A caller in the migrated netns picks params that match a tunnel in the creation netns. The lookup in dev_net(dev) finds nothing. vti6_update() prepends the migrated tunnel at the head of the creation netns hash bucket for those params. Later lookups in the creation netns resolve to the migrated device. xfrm receive delivers the matched packets through a device the caller controls.
Reachable from an unprivileged user namespace (unshare --user --map-root-user --net). Cross tenant scope on container hosts.
Switch the SIOCCHGTUNNEL path on a non fallback device to use t->net for the lookup. The lookup now matches the netns vti6_update() operates on.
Also add ns_capable(self->net->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN) before the lookup. The check at the top of the case is against dev_net(dev)->user_ns, which after migration is the attacker's netns. A caller there can pick params absent from self->net, the lookup returns NULL, t becomes self, and vti6_update() inserts the device into the creation netns hash. The new check requires CAP_NET_ADMIN in the creation netns user_ns too.
SIOCADDTUNNEL and SIOCCHGTUNNEL on the fallback device keep dev_net(dev), which equals init_net there.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-63921"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-19T16:17:10Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nip6: vti: Use ip6_tnl.net in vti6_siocdevprivate().\n\nAfter patch 1/2 in this series, vti6_update() unlinks and relinks\nthe tunnel through t-\u003enet. vti6_siocdevprivate() still uses\ndev_net(dev) for the collision lookup. For a tunnel moved through\nIFLA_NET_NS_FD, dev_net(dev) is the new netns, not t-\u003enet.\n\nSIOCCHGTUNNEL on a migrated tunnel then runs:\n\n net = dev_net(dev) /* migrated netns */\n t = vti6_locate(net, \u0026p1, false) /* misses target in t-\u003enet */\n ...\n t = netdev_priv(dev)\n vti6_update(t, \u0026p1, false) /* mutates t-\u003enet\u0027s hash */\n\nA caller in the migrated netns picks params that match a tunnel\nin the creation netns. The lookup in dev_net(dev) finds nothing.\nvti6_update() prepends the migrated tunnel at the head of the\ncreation netns hash bucket for those params. Later lookups in\nthe creation netns resolve to the migrated device. xfrm receive\ndelivers the matched packets through a device the caller controls.\n\nReachable from an unprivileged user namespace (unshare --user\n--map-root-user --net). Cross tenant scope on container hosts.\n\nSwitch the SIOCCHGTUNNEL path on a non fallback device to use\nt-\u003enet for the lookup. The lookup now matches the netns\nvti6_update() operates on.\n\nAlso add ns_capable(self-\u003enet-\u003euser_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN) before\nthe lookup. The check at the top of the case is against\ndev_net(dev)-\u003euser_ns, which after migration is the attacker\u0027s\nnetns. A caller there can pick params absent from self-\u003enet,\nthe lookup returns NULL, t becomes self, and vti6_update()\ninserts the device into the creation netns hash. The new check\nrequires CAP_NET_ADMIN in the creation netns user_ns too.\n\nSIOCADDTUNNEL and SIOCCHGTUNNEL on the fallback device keep\ndev_net(dev), which equals init_net there.",
"id": "GHSA-c82w-wxq7-hwv4",
"modified": "2026-07-20T15:31:51Z",
"published": "2026-07-19T18:31:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63921"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1acfb7d9c6fc7e209ed7789392697e97e03edd33"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44d2ff7d2178503b93151140a45dfa2ad49c9906"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/596f6354c96a891e58c04a09cbfb7b0d1ec00dab"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/853f6ea482dfcd3404bbef458ab4d68364eed838"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8b484efd5cb4eeef9021a661e198edc5349dacf6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/94ff740a7f9ef5c010784a325dca00cbf228f941"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d2236348414bdd6558385f35aa7fdc9bf5634011"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/df42ac708acc3399bbb6dc5ca16e0540adda7bbf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-C837-XXWH-86C9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-06 21:15 – Updated: 2026-04-08 18:32The WP GDPR plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass due to a missing capability check in versions up to, and including, 2.1.1. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete any comment and modify the plugin’s settings.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-36697"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-06-07T02:15:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The WP GDPR plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass due to a missing capability check in versions up to, and including, 2.1.1. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete any comment and modify the plugin\u2019s settings.",
"id": "GHSA-c837-xxwh-86c9",
"modified": "2026-04-08T18:32:07Z",
"published": "2023-07-06T21:15:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36697"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.nintechnet.com/unauthenticated-stored-xss-and-content-spoofing-vulnerabilities-in-wordpress-wp-gdpr-plugin-unpatched"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.acunetix.com/vulnerabilities/web/wordpress-plugin-wp-gdpr-multiple-vulnerabilities-2-1-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/032e775a-97be-4d93-bac3-094e35be4b11?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-C83X-948P-83GH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-22 06:30 – Updated: 2026-04-22 06:30The a+HRD developed by aEnrich has a Missing Authorization vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to arbitrarily read database contents through a specific API method.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-6834"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-22T04:16:09Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The a+HRD developed by aEnrich has a Missing Authorization vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to arbitrarily read database contents through a specific API method.",
"id": "GHSA-c83x-948p-83gh",
"modified": "2026-04-22T06:30:29Z",
"published": "2026-04-22T06:30:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-6834"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.twcert.org.tw/en/cp-139-10834-eb3ee-2.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.twcert.org.tw/tw/cp-132-10833-e3a53-1.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-C859-GH8G-FHP8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-30 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-08 18:33The Safe Ai Malware Protection for WP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the export_db() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.17. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve a complete dump of the site's database.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-12269"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-30T14:15:31Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The Safe Ai Malware Protection for WP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the export_db() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.17. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve a complete dump of the site\u0027s database.",
"id": "GHSA-c859-gh8g-fhp8",
"modified": "2026-04-08T18:33:47Z",
"published": "2025-01-30T15:31:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12269"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/safe-ai-malware-protection-for-wp/trunk/includes/class-mvsp-export-db.php#L7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3232957%40safe-ai-malware-protection-for-wp\u0026new=3232957%40safe-ai-malware-protection-for-wp\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/5247bf43-ae02-47cb-825e-23821b78eba9?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-C869-JX4C-Q5FC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-10 00:28 – Updated: 2026-02-10 02:56Summary
An authorization bypass vulnerability in the FUXA allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to create and modify arbitrary schedulers, exposing connected ICS/SCADA environments to follow-on actions. This vulnerability affects FUXA version 1.2.8 through version 1.2.10. This has been patched in FUXA version 1.2.11.
Impact
This affects all deployments, including those with runtime.settings.secureEnabled set to true.
Exploitation allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to automatically authenticate as guest and create, modify or delete schedules. These schedules can be configured to trigger immediately or cyclically, forcing connected devices to specific states or values, or executing existing scripts on the server.
Patches
This issue has been patched in FUXA version 1.2.11. Users are strongly encouraged to update to the latest available release.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "fuxa-server"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.2.8"
},
{
"fixed": "1.2.11"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-25939"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-02-10T00:28:28Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-09T23:16:06Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "### Summary\nAn authorization bypass vulnerability in the FUXA allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to create and modify arbitrary schedulers, exposing connected ICS/SCADA environments to follow-on actions. This vulnerability affects FUXA version 1.2.8 through version 1.2.10. This has been patched in FUXA version 1.2.11.\n\n### Impact\nThis affects all deployments, including those with\u00a0`runtime.settings.secureEnabled`\u00a0set to\u00a0`true`.\n\nExploitation allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to automatically authenticate as guest and create, modify or delete schedules. These schedules can be configured to trigger immediately or cyclically, forcing connected devices to specific states or values, or executing existing scripts on the server.\n\n### Patches\n\nThis issue has been patched in FUXA version 1.2.11. Users are strongly encouraged to update to the latest available release.",
"id": "GHSA-c869-jx4c-q5fc",
"modified": "2026-02-10T02:56:59Z",
"published": "2026-02-10T00:28:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/security/advisories/GHSA-c869-jx4c-q5fc"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-25939"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/pull/2174"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/commit/5782b35117a9bd14ffcb881f8dfb8c6680157d9b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/commit/aced6ad0b6089eea4e5cef51c0a88bf4f308d45f"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/releases/tag/v1.2.11"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "FUXA Unauthenticated Remote Arbitrary Scheduler Write"
}
GHSA-C86F-9GRV-PMQF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-09-06 00:00 – Updated: 2024-11-21 21:06Apache IoTDB grafana-connector version 0.13.0 contains an interface without authorization, which may expose the internal structure of a database. Users should upgrade to version 0.13.1, which addresses this issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.iotdb:iotdb-grafana-connector"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.13.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-38370"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-09-15T03:31:34Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-09-05T10:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Apache IoTDB grafana-connector version 0.13.0 contains an interface without authorization, which may expose the internal structure of a database. Users should upgrade to version 0.13.1, which addresses this issue.",
"id": "GHSA-c86f-9grv-pmqf",
"modified": "2024-11-21T21:06:05Z",
"published": "2022-09-06T00:00:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-38370"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/iotdb"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/apache-iotdb/PYSEC-2022-43070.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/kcpqgstvgf8sxy9ktxm1836nlwc8xy3j"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/05/2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Apache IoTDB grafana-connector contains an interface without authorization"
}
GHSA-C876-W45Q-72X4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-09 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:32Missing Authorization vulnerability in BAKKBONE Australia FloristPress.This issue affects FloristPress: from n/a through 7.3.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-53798"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-09T13:15:40Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in BAKKBONE Australia FloristPress.This issue affects FloristPress: from n/a through 7.3.0.",
"id": "GHSA-c876-w45q-72x4",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:32:42Z",
"published": "2024-12-09T15:31:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53798"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/bakkbone-florist-companion/vulnerability/wordpress-floristpress-plugin-7-3-0-nonce-leakage-to-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-C879-9R2P-425R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-26 15:32 – Updated: 2026-06-26 15:32Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in SiteGround Email Marketing <= 1.7.5 versions.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-24547"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-26T15:16:37Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in SiteGround Email Marketing \u003c= 1.7.5 versions.",
"id": "GHSA-c879-9r2p-425r",
"modified": "2026-06-26T15:32:14Z",
"published": "2026-06-26T15:32:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-24547"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/siteground-email-marketing/vulnerability/wordpress-siteground-email-marketing-plugin-1-7-5-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
- Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
Mitigation MIT-4.4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
- For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
- One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws
An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.