CWE-862
Allowed-with-ReviewMissing Authorization
Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
14839 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-MP67-WX57-8M4F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-16 03:30 – Updated: 2024-08-22 15:31In injectInputEventToInputFilter of AccessibilityManagerService.java, there is a possible arbitrary input event injection due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-0038"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-02-16T02:15:51Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In injectInputEventToInputFilter of AccessibilityManagerService.java, there is a possible arbitrary input event injection due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.",
"id": "GHSA-mp67-wx57-8m4f",
"modified": "2024-08-22T15:31:15Z",
"published": "2024-02-16T03:30:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-0038"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/base/+/3e88d987235f5a2acd50a9b6bad78dbbf39cb079"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2024-02-01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MP7C-M3RH-R56V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-16 20:18 – Updated: 2025-09-22 22:59Impact
matrix-js-sdk before 38.2.0 has insufficient validation of room predecessor links in MatrixClient::getJoinedRooms, allowing a remote attacker to attempt to replace a tombstoned room with an unrelated attacker-supplied room.
Patches
The issue has been patched and users should upgrade to 38.2.0.
Workarounds
Avoid using MatrixClient::getJoinedRooms in favour of getRooms() and filtering upgraded rooms separately.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "matrix-js-sdk"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "38.2.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-59160"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20",
"CWE-345",
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-09-16T20:18:57Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-16T17:15:41Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\nmatrix-js-sdk before 38.2.0 has insufficient validation of room predecessor links in `MatrixClient::getJoinedRooms`, allowing a remote attacker to attempt to replace a tombstoned room with an unrelated attacker-supplied room.\n\n### Patches\nThe issue has been patched and users should upgrade to 38.2.0.\n\n### Workarounds\nAvoid using `MatrixClient::getJoinedRooms` in favour of `getRooms()` and filtering upgraded rooms separately.",
"id": "GHSA-mp7c-m3rh-r56v",
"modified": "2025-09-22T22:59:23Z",
"published": "2025-09-16T20:18:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-js-sdk/security/advisories/GHSA-mp7c-m3rh-r56v"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-59160"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-js-sdk/commit/43c72d5bf5e2d0a26b3b4f71092e7cb39d4137c4"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-js-sdk"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-js-sdk/releases/tag/v38.2.0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.npmjs.com/package/matrix-js-sdk/v/38.2.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "matrix-js-sdk has insufficient validation when considering a room to be upgraded by another"
}
GHSA-MP7W-5WJG-J77R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-23 15:31 – Updated: 2026-01-23 21:30Missing Authorization vulnerability in Web Impian Bayarcash WooCommerce bayarcash-wc allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Bayarcash WooCommerce: from n/a through <= 4.3.11.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-24606"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-23T15:16:19Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Web Impian Bayarcash WooCommerce bayarcash-wc allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Bayarcash WooCommerce: from n/a through \u003c= 4.3.11.",
"id": "GHSA-mp7w-5wjg-j77r",
"modified": "2026-01-23T21:30:43Z",
"published": "2026-01-23T15:31:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-24606"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/bayarcash-wc/vulnerability/wordpress-bayarcash-woocommerce-plugin-4-3-11-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MP8X-36FV-PWV3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-11-27 03:30 – Updated: 2022-12-01 18:30The ESL (Electronic Shelf Label) protocol, as implemented by (for example) the OV80e934802 RF transceiver on the ETAG-2130-V4.3 20190629 board, does not use authentication, which allows attackers to change label values via 433 MHz RF signals, as demonstrated by disrupting the organization of a hospital storage unit, or changing retail pricing.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-45914"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-294",
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-11-27T01:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The ESL (Electronic Shelf Label) protocol, as implemented by (for example) the OV80e934802 RF transceiver on the ETAG-2130-V4.3 20190629 board, does not use authentication, which allows attackers to change label values via 433 MHz RF signals, as demonstrated by disrupting the organization of a hospital storage unit, or changing retail pricing.",
"id": "GHSA-mp8x-36fv-pwv3",
"modified": "2022-12-01T18:30:47Z",
"published": "2022-11-27T03:30:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-45914"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQRMNjZVlHg"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/170177/Zhuhai-Suny-Technology-ESL-Tag-Forgery-Replay-Attacks.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Dec/6"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MPC2-3367-CHHH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:14 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:14The Service Layer of SAP Business One, version - 10.0, allows an authenticated attacker to invoke certain functions that would otherwise be restricted to specific users. For an attacker to discover the vulnerable function, no in-depth system knowledge is required. Once exploited via Network stack, the attacker may be able to read, modify or delete restricted data. The impact is that missing authorization can result of abuse of functionality usually restricted to specific users.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-33704"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-09-15T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The Service Layer of SAP Business One, version - 10.0, allows an authenticated attacker to invoke certain functions that would otherwise be restricted to specific users. For an attacker to discover the vulnerable function, no in-depth system knowledge is required. Once exploited via Network stack, the attacker may be able to read, modify or delete restricted data. The impact is that missing authorization can result of abuse of functionality usually restricted to specific users.",
"id": "GHSA-mpc2-3367-chhh",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:14:34Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:14:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-33704"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://launchpad.support.sap.com/#/notes/3078072"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=582222806"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-MPC5-8RVQ-8QFX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-30 18:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:35Missing Authorization vulnerability in David Gwyer Simple Sitemap – Create a Responsive HTML Sitemap.This issue affects Simple Sitemap – Create a Responsive HTML Sitemap: from n/a through 3.5.14.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-39413"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-30T18:15:47Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in David Gwyer Simple Sitemap \u2013 Create a Responsive HTML Sitemap.This issue affects Simple Sitemap \u2013 Create a Responsive HTML Sitemap: from n/a through 3.5.14.",
"id": "GHSA-mpc5-8rvq-8qfx",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:35:01Z",
"published": "2025-04-30T18:31:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39413"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/simple-sitemap/vulnerability/wordpress-simple-sitemap-create-a-responsive-html-sitemap-plugin-3-5-14-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MPC8-JXJH-QPGH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-18 20:34 – Updated: 2026-06-18 20:34Summary
Focus command could miss controlScope enforcement. In affected versions, a caller able to trigger the focus command could run the command without enforcing the expected control scope.
This advisory is scoped to the named feature and configuration. It does not change OpenClaw's trusted-operator model: authenticated Gateway operators, installed plugins, and intentional local execution surfaces remain trusted unless a separate policy, approval, allowlist, sandbox, or auth boundary is crossed.
Impact
When the affected feature is enabled and reachable, this could change focus state outside the intended caller authority. Practical impact depends on the operator's configuration and whether lower-trust input can reach that path.
Patched Versions
The first stable patched version is 2026.4.25.
Mitigations
restrict focus command access to trusted operators until patched. As general hardening, keep channel and tool allowlists narrow, avoid sharing one Gateway between mutually untrusted users, and disable the affected feature when it is not needed.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2026.4.24"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.4.25"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-53850"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-18T20:34:46Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nFocus command could miss controlScope enforcement. In affected versions, a caller able to trigger the focus command could run the command without enforcing the expected control scope.\n\nThis advisory is scoped to the named feature and configuration. It does not change OpenClaw\u0027s trusted-operator model: authenticated Gateway operators, installed plugins, and intentional local execution surfaces remain trusted unless a separate policy, approval, allowlist, sandbox, or auth boundary is crossed.\n\n### Impact\n\nWhen the affected feature is enabled and reachable, this could change focus state outside the intended caller authority. Practical impact depends on the operator\u0027s configuration and whether lower-trust input can reach that path.\n\n### Patched Versions\n\nThe first stable patched version is `2026.4.25`.\n\n### Mitigations\n\nrestrict focus command access to trusted operators until patched. As general hardening, keep channel and tool allowlists narrow, avoid sharing one Gateway between mutually untrusted users, and disable the affected feature when it is not needed.",
"id": "GHSA-mpc8-jxjh-qpgh",
"modified": "2026-06-18T20:34:46Z",
"published": "2026-06-18T20:34:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-mpc8-jxjh-qpgh"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53850"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-control-scope-enforcement-bypass-in-focus-command"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw: Focus command could miss controlScope enforcement"
}
GHSA-MPF5-3VPH-Q75R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-16 20:41 – Updated: 2026-06-08 19:53Impact
The translation memory API exposed unintended endpoints, which in turn didn't do proper access control.
Patches
- https://github.com/WeblateOrg/weblate/pull/18513
Workarounds
Blocking access to /api/memory/ in the HTTP server removes access to this feature.
References
This issue was reported by ggamno via HackerOne.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "Weblate"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.17"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33214"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-16T20:41:19Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-15T18:17:20Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\nThe translation memory API exposed unintended endpoints, which in turn didn\u0027t do proper access control.\n\n### Patches\n* https://github.com/WeblateOrg/weblate/pull/18513\n\n### Workarounds\nBlocking access to `/api/memory/` in the HTTP server removes access to this feature.\n\n### References\nThis issue was reported by [ggamno](https://hackerone.com/ggamno) via HackerOne.",
"id": "GHSA-mpf5-3vph-q75r",
"modified": "2026-06-08T19:53:53Z",
"published": "2026-04-16T20:41:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/WeblateOrg/weblate/security/advisories/GHSA-mpf5-3vph-q75r"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33214"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/WeblateOrg/weblate/pull/18513"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/WeblateOrg/weblate"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/weblate/PYSEC-2026-152.yaml"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Weblate: Improper access control for the translation memory in API"
}
GHSA-MPFF-XHG4-VR45
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-24 15:31 – Updated: 2026-06-24 18:32A missing permission check in Jenkins MCP Server Plugin 0.177.v629fdb_2557fe and earlier allows attackers with Item/Read permission to read the Pipeline replay scripts of jobs they can access.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-57300"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-24T14:17:36Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A missing permission check in Jenkins MCP Server Plugin 0.177.v629fdb_2557fe and earlier allows attackers with Item/Read permission to read the Pipeline replay scripts of jobs they can access.",
"id": "GHSA-mpff-xhg4-vr45",
"modified": "2026-06-24T18:32:39Z",
"published": "2026-06-24T15:31:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-57300"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2026-06-24/#SECURITY-3759"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-MPFV-C66G-P7M7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-13 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:35Missing Authorization vulnerability in VillaTheme(villatheme.com) ALD – Dropshipping and Fulfillment for AliExpress and WooCommerce allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects ALD – Dropshipping and Fulfillment for AliExpress and WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.0.21.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-46811"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-13T15:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in VillaTheme(villatheme.com) ALD \u2013 Dropshipping and Fulfillment for AliExpress and WooCommerce allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects ALD \u2013 Dropshipping and Fulfillment for AliExpress and WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.0.21.",
"id": "GHSA-mpfv-c66g-p7m7",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:35:22Z",
"published": "2024-12-13T15:30:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-46811"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/woo-alidropship/vulnerability/wordpress-ald-dropshipping-and-fulfillment-for-aliexpress-and-woocommerce-plugin-1-0-21-broken-access-control-csrf?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
- Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
Mitigation MIT-4.4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
- For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
- One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws
An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.