Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-862

Weakness Allowed-with-Review

Missing Authorization

Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

Dimensions

  • Behavior-Property: Missing
  • Behavior-Type: Authorization
Mapping guidance

This CWE entry is a Class and might have Base-level children that would be more appropriate

Examine children of this entry to see if there is a better fit

Relationships and members
ChildOf: CWE-285 · View CWE-1000
  • Behavior-Property: Improper
ChildOf: CWE-284 · View CWE-1340
  • Behavior-Property: Improper
  • Behavior-Type: Access Control
Modes of introduction
Architecture and Design

OMISSION: This weakness is caused by missing a security tactic during the architecture and design phase.

Authorization weaknesses may arise when a single-user application is ported to a multi-user environment.

Implementation

A developer may introduce authorization weaknesses because of a lack of understanding about the underlying technologies. For example, a developer may assume that attackers cannot modify certain inputs such as headers or cookies.

Operation
Detection methods

Automated Static Analysis

Automated static analysis is useful for detecting commonly-used idioms for authorization. A tool may be able to analyze related configuration files, such as .htaccess in Apache web servers, or detect the usage of commonly-used authorization libraries.

Generally, automated static analysis tools have difficulty detecting custom authorization schemes. In addition, the software's design may include some functionality that is accessible to any user and does not require an authorization check; an automated technique that detects the absence of authorization may report false positives.

Effectiveness: Limited

Automated Dynamic Analysis

Automated dynamic analysis may find many or all possible interfaces that do not require authorization, but manual analysis is required to determine if the lack of authorization violates business logic.

Manual Analysis

This weakness can be detected using tools and techniques that require manual (human) analysis, such as penetration testing, threat modeling, and interactive tools that allow the tester to record and modify an active session.

Specifically, manual static analysis is useful for evaluating the correctness of custom authorization mechanisms.

Effectiveness: Moderate

These may be more effective than strictly automated techniques. This is especially the case with weaknesses that are related to design and business rules. However, manual efforts might not achieve desired code coverage within limited time constraints.

Manual Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:

Cost effective for partial coverage:

Binary / Bytecode disassembler - then use manual analysis for vulnerabilities & anomalies

Effectiveness: SOAR Partial

Dynamic Analysis with Automated Results Interpretation

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:

Cost effective for partial coverage:

Web Application Scanner

Web Services Scanner

Database Scanners

Effectiveness: SOAR Partial

Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:

Cost effective for partial coverage:

Host Application Interface Scanner

Fuzz Tester

Framework-based Fuzzer

Effectiveness: SOAR Partial

Manual Static Analysis - Source Code

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:

Cost effective for partial coverage:

Focused Manual Spotcheck - Focused manual analysis of source

Manual Source Code Review (not inspections)

Effectiveness: SOAR Partial

Automated Static Analysis - Source Code

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:

Cost effective for partial coverage:

Source code Weakness Analyzer

Context-configured Source Code Weakness Analyzer

Effectiveness: SOAR Partial

Architecture or Design Review

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful:

Highly cost effective:

Inspection (IEEE 1028 standard) (can apply to requirements, design, source code, etc.)

Formal Methods / Correct-By-Construction

Effectiveness: High

Notes

Terminology

Assuming a user with a given identity, authorization is the process of determining whether that user can access a given resource, based on the user's privileges and any permissions or other access-control specifications that apply to the resource.

Content history
Submission: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2011-05-24 · CWE 1.13
Contribution: "Mapping CWE to 62443" Sub-Working Group · CWE-CAPEC ICS/OT SIG · 2023-04-25 · CWE 4.11

Suggested mappings to ISA/IEC 62443.

Contribution: Abhi Balakrishnan · 2024-02-29 · CWE 4.16

Provided diagram to improve CWE usability

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2011-06-27 · CWE 2.0

updated Demonstrative_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2011-09-13 · CWE 2.1

updated Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2012-05-11 · CWE 2.2

updated Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples, References, Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2012-10-30 · CWE 2.3

updated Potential_Mitigations

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2014-02-18 · CWE 2.6

updated Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2014-07-30 · CWE 2.8

updated Detection_Factors

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2017-01-19 · CWE 2.10

updated Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2017-11-08 · CWE 3.0

updated Applicable_Platforms, Modes_of_Introduction, References, Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2018-03-27 · CWE 3.1

updated References

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2019-06-20 · CWE 3.3

updated Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2020-02-24 · CWE 4.0

updated Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2020-08-20 · CWE 4.2

updated Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2020-12-10 · CWE 4.3

updated Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2021-03-15 · CWE 4.4

updated Alternate_Terms, Observed_Examples

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2021-07-20 · CWE 4.5

updated Observed_Examples, Related_Attack_Patterns, Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2021-10-28 · CWE 4.6

updated Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2022-06-28 · CWE 4.8

updated Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2022-10-13 · CWE 4.9

updated Observed_Examples

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2023-01-31 · CWE 4.10

updated Description, Potential_Mitigations

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2023-04-27 · CWE 4.11

updated References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2023-06-29 · CWE 4.12

updated Mapping_Notes, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2024-11-19 · CWE 4.16

updated Common_Consequences, Description, Diagram, Relationships, Terminology_Notes

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2025-09-09 · CWE 4.18

updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, Observed_Examples, References

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2025-12-11 · CWE 4.19

updated Applicable_Platforms, Relationships, Weakness_Ordinalities

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2026-04-30 · CWE 4.20

updated Applicable_Platforms, Observed_Examples, Relationships

Modification: CWE Content Team · MITRE · 2026-10-28 · CWE 5.0

updated Applicable_Platforms, Dimensions, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings

19845 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-6VVF-X3W7-J2C2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:20 – Updated: 2022-07-13 00:00
VLAI
Details

In onStart of MainActivity.java, there is a possible bypass of developer settings requirements for capturing system traces due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10Android ID: A-142936525

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-0202"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-276",
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-06-11T15:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In onStart of MainActivity.java, there is a possible bypass of developer settings requirements for capturing system traces due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-10Android ID: A-142936525",
  "id": "GHSA-6vvf-x3w7-j2c2",
  "modified": "2022-07-13T00:00:42Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:20:18Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-0202"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/pixel/2020-06-01"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/pixel/2020-12-01"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-6VW3-5CC7-RMC7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-01 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34
VLAI
Details

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Dmitry V. (CEO of "UKR Solution") Barcode Generator for WooCommerce allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Barcode Generator for WooCommerce: from n/a through 2.0.4.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-31879"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-01T15:16:30Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Dmitry V. (CEO of \"UKR Solution\") Barcode Generator for WooCommerce allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Barcode Generator for WooCommerce: from n/a through 2.0.4.",
  "id": "GHSA-6vw3-5cc7-rmc7",
  "modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:24Z",
  "published": "2025-04-01T15:31:45Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-31879"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/embedding-barcodes-into-product-pages-and-orders/vulnerability/wordpress-barcode-generator-for-woocommerce-plugin-2-0-4-settings-change-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-6W2R-CFPC-23R5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-07 02:25 – Updated: 2026-03-10 18:43
VLAI
Summary
AVideo has Unauthenticated IDOR - Playlist Information Disclosure
Details

Product: AVideo (https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo) Version: Latest (tested March 2026) Type: Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) Auth Required: No User Interaction: None

Summary

The /objects/playlistsFromUser.json.php endpoint returns all playlists for any user without requiring authentication or authorization. An unauthenticated attacker can enumerate user IDs and retrieve playlist information including playlist names, video IDs, and playlist status for any user on the platform.

Root Cause

The endpoint accepts a users_id parameter and directly queries the database without any authentication or authorization check. File: objects/playlistsFromUser.json.php

if (empty($_GET['users_id'])) {
    die("You need a user");
}
// NO AUTHENTICATION CHECK
// NO AUTHORIZATION CHECK (does this user_id belong to the requester?)
$row = PlayList::getAllFromUser($_GET['users_id'], false);
echo json_encode($row);

There is no call to User::isLogged() or any comparison between the requesting user and the target users_id.

Affected Code

File Line Issue
objects/playlistsFromUser.json.php 10-21 No authentication or authorization check before returning playlist data

Proof of Concept

Retrieve admin's playlists (user ID 1)

curl "https://TARGET/objects/playlistsFromUser.json.php?users_id=1"

Response:

[
  {"id":false,"name":"Watch Later","status":"watch_later","users_id":1},
  {"id":false,"name":"Favorite","status":"favorite","users_id":1}
]

image

Impact

  • Privacy violation — any visitor can see all users' playlist names and contents
  • User enumeration — valid user IDs can be discovered by iterating through IDs
  • Information gathering — playlist names and video IDs reveal user interests and private content preferences
  • Targeted attacks — gathered information can be used for social engineering or further exploitation

Remediation

Add authentication and authorization checks:

// Option 1: Require authentication + only own playlists
if (!User::isLogged()) {
    die(json_encode(['error' => 'Authentication required']));
}
if ($_GET['users_id'] != User::getId() && !User::isAdmin()) {
    die(json_encode(['error' => 'Access denied']));
}

// Option 2: If public playlists are intended, filter by visibility
$row = PlayList::getAllFromUser($_GET['users_id'], false, 'public');
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "wwbn/avideo"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "25.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-30885"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306",
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-07T02:25:48Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-10T17:40:14Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "**Product:** AVideo (https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo)\n**Version:** Latest (tested March 2026)\n**Type:** Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR)\n**Auth Required:** No\n**User Interaction:** None\n\n## Summary\n\nThe `/objects/playlistsFromUser.json.php` endpoint returns all playlists for any user without requiring authentication or authorization. An unauthenticated attacker can enumerate user IDs and retrieve playlist information including playlist names, video IDs, and playlist status for any user on the platform.\n\n## Root Cause\n\nThe endpoint accepts a `users_id` parameter and directly queries the database without any authentication or authorization check.\n**File:** `objects/playlistsFromUser.json.php`\n\n```php\nif (empty($_GET[\u0027users_id\u0027])) {\n    die(\"You need a user\");\n}\n// NO AUTHENTICATION CHECK\n// NO AUTHORIZATION CHECK (does this user_id belong to the requester?)\n$row = PlayList::getAllFromUser($_GET[\u0027users_id\u0027], false);\necho json_encode($row);\n```\n\nThere is no call to `User::isLogged()` or any comparison between the requesting user and the target `users_id`.\n\n## Affected Code\n\n| File | Line | Issue |\n|------|------|-------|\n| `objects/playlistsFromUser.json.php` | 10-21 | No authentication or authorization check before returning playlist data |\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n### Retrieve admin\u0027s playlists (user ID 1)\n\n```bash\ncurl \"https://TARGET/objects/playlistsFromUser.json.php?users_id=1\"\n```\n\n**Response:**\n```json\n[\n  {\"id\":false,\"name\":\"Watch Later\",\"status\":\"watch_later\",\"users_id\":1},\n  {\"id\":false,\"name\":\"Favorite\",\"status\":\"favorite\",\"users_id\":1}\n]\n```\n\n\u003cimg width=\"1805\" height=\"365\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a13c9c2f-29be-4399-98d2-7570ca30465a\" /\u003e\n\n\n## Impact\n\n- **Privacy violation** \u2014 any visitor can see all users\u0027 playlist names and contents\n- **User enumeration** \u2014 valid user IDs can be discovered by iterating through IDs\n- **Information gathering** \u2014 playlist names and video IDs reveal user interests and private content preferences\n- **Targeted attacks** \u2014 gathered information can be used for social engineering or further exploitation\n\n## Remediation\n\nAdd authentication and authorization checks:\n\n```php\n// Option 1: Require authentication + only own playlists\nif (!User::isLogged()) {\n    die(json_encode([\u0027error\u0027 =\u003e \u0027Authentication required\u0027]));\n}\nif ($_GET[\u0027users_id\u0027] != User::getId() \u0026\u0026 !User::isAdmin()) {\n    die(json_encode([\u0027error\u0027 =\u003e \u0027Access denied\u0027]));\n}\n\n// Option 2: If public playlists are intended, filter by visibility\n$row = PlayList::getAllFromUser($_GET[\u0027users_id\u0027], false, \u0027public\u0027);\n```",
  "id": "GHSA-6w2r-cfpc-23r5",
  "modified": "2026-03-10T18:43:57Z",
  "published": "2026-03-07T02:25:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/security/advisories/GHSA-6w2r-cfpc-23r5"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-30885"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/commit/12adc66913724736937a61130ae2779c299445ca"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "AVideo has Unauthenticated IDOR - Playlist Information Disclosure"
}

GHSA-6W3R-9V7P-W427

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-27 03:30 – Updated: 2026-01-20 15:31
VLAI
Details

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Reoon Technology Reoon Email Verifier reoon-email-verifier allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Reoon Email Verifier: from n/a through <= 2.0.1.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-62938"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-10-27T02:15:53Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Reoon Technology Reoon Email Verifier reoon-email-verifier allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Reoon Email Verifier: from n/a through \u003c= 2.0.1.",
  "id": "GHSA-6w3r-9v7p-w427",
  "modified": "2026-01-20T15:31:36Z",
  "published": "2025-10-27T03:30:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-62938"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/reoon-email-verifier/vulnerability/wordpress-reoon-email-verifier-plugin-2-0-1-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vdp.patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/reoon-email-verifier/vulnerability/wordpress-reoon-email-verifier-plugin-2-0-1-broken-access-control-vulnerability"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vdp.patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/reoon-email-verifier/vulnerability/wordpress-reoon-email-verifier-plugin-2-0-1-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-6W4X-5VF2-7756

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-30 18:31 – Updated: 2026-06-30 18:31
VLAI
Details

JeecgBoot through 3.9.2 contains a broken access control vulnerability that allows authenticated low-privilege users to perform full create, read, update, and delete operations on OpenAPI credentials by accessing the OpenApiAuthController and OpenApiPermissionController endpoints which lack Shiro authorization annotations. Attackers can exploit the unenforced access controls to list, add, edit, and delete all AK/SK credential pairs, with the list endpoint returning secret keys in plaintext, enabling credential theft and unauthorized invocation of the OpenAPI surface.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-58377"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-30T17:16:26Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "JeecgBoot through 3.9.2 contains a broken access control vulnerability that allows authenticated low-privilege users to perform full create, read, update, and delete operations on OpenAPI credentials by accessing the OpenApiAuthController and OpenApiPermissionController endpoints which lack Shiro authorization annotations. Attackers can exploit the unenforced access controls to list, add, edit, and delete all AK/SK credential pairs, with the list endpoint returning secret keys in plaintext, enabling credential theft and unauthorized invocation of the OpenAPI surface.",
  "id": "GHSA-6w4x-5vf2-7756",
  "modified": "2026-06-30T18:31:40Z",
  "published": "2026-06-30T18:31:40Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-58377"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jeecgboot/JeecgBoot/issues/9705"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/jeecgboot-missing-authorization-on-openapi-credential-management-endpoints-exposes-access-secret-keys"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-6W69-87J9-3R87

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-20 00:35 – Updated: 2026-08-20 00:35
VLAI
Details

In Splunk AI Toolkit versions below 6.0.0, a low-privileged user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could start, stop, and configure containers, and read or modify connection and configuration data through the Representational State Transfer (REST) API. The missing authorization is possible because multiple REST API handlers in Splunk AI Toolkit do not enforce authorization checks. For more information see Troubleshoot the Splunk Machine Learning Toolkit (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-cloud-platform/apply-machine-learning/machine-learning-toolkit-user-guide/5.5.0/troubleshooting-mltk/troubleshoot-the-splunk-machine-learning-toolkit) in the Splunk documentation.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-76394"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-19T22:17:25Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In Splunk AI Toolkit versions below 6.0.0, a low-privileged user who does not hold the \"admin\" or \"power\" Splunk roles could start, stop, and configure containers, and read or modify connection and configuration data through the Representational State Transfer (REST) API. The missing authorization is possible because multiple REST API handlers in Splunk AI Toolkit do not enforce authorization checks. For more information see Troubleshoot the Splunk Machine Learning Toolkit (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-cloud-platform/apply-machine-learning/machine-learning-toolkit-user-guide/5.5.0/troubleshooting-mltk/troubleshoot-the-splunk-machine-learning-toolkit) in the Splunk documentation.",
  "id": "GHSA-6w69-87j9-3r87",
  "modified": "2026-08-20T00:35:06Z",
  "published": "2026-08-20T00:35:06Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-76394"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0808"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-6W6P-J4GP-7CPH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-25 21:33 – Updated: 2026-09-25 21:33
VLAI
Details

TDuck survey form through 6.0 fails to enforce form fill-in restrictions on the authenticated submission endpoint POST /user/form/data/create. Authenticated attackers who know a form's key can submit unlimited entries to any form, bypassing publish status, time window, quota, and per-IP restrictions to falsify collected results.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-100305"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-25T19:16:50Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "TDuck survey form through 6.0 fails to enforce form fill-in restrictions on the authenticated submission endpoint POST /user/form/data/create. Authenticated attackers who know a form\u0027s key can submit unlimited entries to any form, bypassing publish status, time window, quota, and per-IP restrictions to falsify collected results.",
  "id": "GHSA-6w6p-j4gp-7cph",
  "modified": "2026-09-25T21:33:00Z",
  "published": "2026-09-25T21:33:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-100305"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/LinYuanyi1/cve-request-poc/blob/adffc39b78cad18cd489cbf7454853bf0f744b7f/tduck/poc_form_data_create_bypass.py"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/TDuckCloud/tduck-survey-form"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/TDuckCloud/tduck-survey-form/blob/43ffa9c993e38936fc4de7d8e5aee82bbaa19502/tduck-api/src/main/java/com/tduck/cloud/api/web/controller/UserFormResultController.java#L135-L172"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/TDuckCloud/tduck-survey-form/blob/43ffa9c993e38936fc4de7d8e5aee82bbaa19502/tduck-form/src/main/java/com/tduck/cloud/form/service/impl/UserFormSettingServiceImpl.java#L77-L135"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/tduck-survey-form-through-6.0-fill-in-restriction-bypass-via-authenticated-submission-endpoint"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-6W6X-M5FR-MPPC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-18 09:30 – Updated: 2025-11-18 09:30
VLAI
Details

The Download Panel plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized settings modification due to a missing capability check on the 'wp_ajax_save_settings' AJAX action in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.3. This is due to the absence of any capability verification in the dlpn_save_settings() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to arbitrarily modify plugin settings including display text, download links, button colors, and other visual customizations.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-12961"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-11-18T09:15:49Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Download Panel plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized settings modification due to a missing capability check on the \u0027wp_ajax_save_settings\u0027 AJAX action in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.3. This is due to the absence of any capability verification in the `dlpn_save_settings()` function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to arbitrarily modify plugin settings including display text, download links, button colors, and other visual customizations.",
  "id": "GHSA-6w6x-m5fr-mppc",
  "modified": "2025-11-18T09:30:52Z",
  "published": "2025-11-18T09:30:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-12961"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/download-panel/tags/1.3.3/plugin.php#L50"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/download-panel/tags/1.3.3/plugin.php#L51"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/e1a1df7e-1a57-45b3-a4b3-cb3218782ad9?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-6W76-CC53-2PJR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-10 09:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34
VLAI
Details

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Detheme DethemeKit For Elementor. This issue affects DethemeKit For Elementor: from n/a through 2.1.10.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-32260"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-10T08:15:20Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Detheme DethemeKit For Elementor. This issue affects DethemeKit For Elementor: from n/a through 2.1.10.",
  "id": "GHSA-6w76-cc53-2pjr",
  "modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:39Z",
  "published": "2025-04-10T09:30:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-32260"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/dethemekit-for-elementor/vulnerability/wordpress-dethemekit-for-elementor-plugin-2-1-10-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-6W8G-45HG-7R2C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-02 03:30 – Updated: 2026-01-02 03:30
VLAI
Details

The Registration, User Profile, Membership, Content Restriction, User Directory, and Frontend Post Submission – WP User Frontend plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized loss of data due to a missing capability check on the 'Frontend_Form_Ajax::submit_post' function in all versions up to, and including, 4.2.4. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete attachment.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-14047"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-01-02T03:15:50Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Registration, User Profile, Membership, Content Restriction, User Directory, and Frontend Post Submission \u2013 WP User Frontend plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized loss of data due to a missing capability check on the \u0027Frontend_Form_Ajax::submit_post\u0027 function in all versions up to, and including, 4.2.4. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete attachment.",
  "id": "GHSA-6w8g-45hg-7r2c",
  "modified": "2026-01-02T03:30:22Z",
  "published": "2026-01-02T03:30:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-14047"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-user-frontend/tags/4.2.2/includes/Ajax.php#L25"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-user-frontend/tags/4.2.2/includes/Ajax.php#L69"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-user-frontend/tags/4.2.2/includes/Ajax/Frontend_Form_Ajax.php#L133"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-user-frontend/tags/4.2.2/includes/Ajax/Frontend_Form_Ajax.php#L35"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-user-frontend/tags/4.2.2/includes/Ajax/Frontend_Form_Ajax.php#L55"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3430352/wp-user-frontend/trunk/includes/Ajax/Frontend_Form_Ajax.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/6e95b16f-a25a-45c7-a875-2d34a1e127ce?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
  • Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].

Mitigation MIT-4.4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
  • One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
System Configuration Installation

Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws

An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.