CWE-787
Weakness Allowed-with-ReviewOut-of-bounds Write
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Dimensions
- Behavior-Type: Write
- Resource-Type: Memory Buffer
- Resource-Property: Out-of-bounds
Mapping guidance
This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities. However, closer examination is required.
While this CWE is allowed for mapping, it has more specific children that might be a better fit. Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is appropriate. Consider the root cause errors that have led to the out-of-bounds write by examining "CanFollow" relationships for this entry.
Relationships and members
Modes of introduction
Detection methods
Automated Static Analysis
This weakness can often be detected using automated static analysis tools. Many modern tools use data flow analysis or constraint-based techniques to minimize the number of false positives.
Automated static analysis generally does not account for environmental considerations when reporting out-of-bounds memory operations. This can make it difficult for users to determine which warnings should be investigated first. For example, an analysis tool might report buffer overflows that originate from command line arguments in a program that is not expected to run with setuid or other special privileges.
Effectiveness: High
Detection techniques for buffer-related errors are more mature than for most other weakness types.
Automated Dynamic Analysis
This weakness can be detected using dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the software using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The software's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Automated Dynamic Analysis
Use tools that are integrated during compilation to insert runtime error-checking mechanisms related to memory safety errors, such as AddressSanitizer (ASan) for C/C++ [REF-1518].
Effectiveness: Moderate
Crafted inputs are necessary to reach the code containing the error, such as generated by fuzzers. Also, these tools may reduce performance, and they only report the error condition - not the original mistake that led to the error.
Content history
Suggested mappings to ISA/IEC 62443.
Provided diagram to improve CWE usability
updated Demonstrative_Examples
updated Relationships
updated Common_Consequences
updated Demonstrative_Examples
updated Relationships
updated Description
updated Applicable_Platforms, Demonstrative_Examples, Detection_Factors, Likelihood_of_Exploit, Observed_Examples, Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction
updated Observed_Examples, Relationships
updated Observed_Examples
updated Alternate_Terms, Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples, Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Demonstrative_Examples
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Potential_Mitigations, Relationships
updated Observed_Examples, Relationships
updated Applicable_Platforms
updated Alternate_Terms, Demonstrative_Examples, Description
updated Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Mapping_Notes, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Demonstrative_Examples
updated Alternate_Terms, Common_Consequences, Description, Diagram, Weakness_Ordinalities
updated Observed_Examples, Relationships
updated Observed_Examples, Relationships
updated Affected_Resources, Functional_Areas, References
updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, References, Relationships
updated Mapping_Notes
updated Dimensions, Observed_Examples, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
17075 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-W6WH-QR7X-H932
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-09-02 00:01 – Updated: 2022-09-08 00:00An integer coercion error was found in the openvswitch kernel module. Given a sufficiently large number of actions, while copying and reserving memory for a new action of a new flow, the reserve_sfa_size() function does not return -EMSGSIZE as expected, potentially leading to an out-of-bounds write access. This flaw allows a local user to crash or potentially escalate their privileges on the system.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-2639"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-192",
"CWE-681",
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-09-01T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An integer coercion error was found in the openvswitch kernel module. Given a sufficiently large number of actions, while copying and reserving memory for a new action of a new flow, the reserve_sfa_size() function does not return -EMSGSIZE as expected, potentially leading to an out-of-bounds write access. This flaw allows a local user to crash or potentially escalate their privileges on the system.",
"id": "GHSA-w6wh-qr7x-h932",
"modified": "2022-09-08T00:00:29Z",
"published": "2022-09-02T00:01:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-2639"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/cefa91b2332d7009bc0be5d951d6cbbf349f90f8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084479"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W6WR-J337-QPFV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-14 03:30 – Updated: 2026-10-14 03:30Out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Hitachi Disk Array Driver for AIX and Hitachi Disk Array Driver for Virtual I/O Server.
This issue affects Hitachi Disk Array Driver for AIX: from 01-00 before 01-23-/A; Hitachi Disk Array Driver for Virtual I/O Server: from 01-04 before 01-23-/A.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-86573"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-14T02:17:01Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Hitachi Disk Array Driver for AIX and Hitachi Disk Array Driver for Virtual I/O Server.\n\nThis issue affects Hitachi Disk Array Driver for AIX: from 01-00 before 01-23-/A; Hitachi Disk Array Driver for Virtual I/O Server: from 01-04 before 01-23-/A.",
"id": "GHSA-w6wr-j337-qpfv",
"modified": "2026-10-14T03:30:39Z",
"published": "2026-10-14T03:30:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-86573"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.hitachi.com/products/it/software/security/info/vuls/hitachi-sec-2026-137/index.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W6XC-89XR-622V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-07 09:31 – Updated: 2025-05-07 09:31An Out-of-bounds Write in RT-Labs P-Net version 1.0.1 or earlier allows an attacker to induce a crash in IO devices that use the library by sending a malicious RPC packet.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-32405"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-07T07:15:51Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An Out-of-bounds Write in RT-Labs P-Net version 1.0.1 or earlier allows an attacker to induce a crash in IO devices that use the library by sending a malicious RPC packet.",
"id": "GHSA-w6xc-89xr-622v",
"modified": "2025-05-07T09:31:18Z",
"published": "2025-05-07T09:31:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-32405"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.nozominetworks.com/labs/vulnerability-advisories-cve-2025-32405"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W6XC-JCFF-G3VG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:30 – Updated: 2025-04-12 13:04Integer overflow in the MDC2_Update function in crypto/mdc2/mdc2dgst.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-6303"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2016-09-16T05:59:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Integer overflow in the MDC2_Update function in crypto/mdc2/mdc2dgst.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors.",
"id": "GHSA-w6xc-jcff-g3vg",
"modified": "2025-04-12T13:04:15Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:30:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-6303"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa132"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370146"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-412672.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=55d83bf7c10c7b205fffa23fa7c3977491e56c07"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=55d83bf7c10c7b205fffa23fa7c3977491e56c07"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA40312"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/september-2016-security-releases"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-16:26.openssl.asc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160922.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-16"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-20"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-21"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content\u0026id=JSA10759"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21995039"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92984"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036885"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W74V-4VVF-QM9C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-19 21:30 – Updated: 2026-08-19 21:30IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an out-of-bounds write.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-16840"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-19T20:17:05Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an out-of-bounds write.",
"id": "GHSA-w74v-4vvf-qm9c",
"modified": "2026-08-19T21:30:34Z",
"published": "2026-08-19T21:30:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-16840"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283858"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W759-3HJ5-QW74
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-05 06:30 – Updated: 2024-02-09 03:33In keyInstall, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS08471742; Issue ID: ALPS08308608.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-20013"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-02-05T06:15:47Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In keyInstall, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS08471742; Issue ID: ALPS08308608.",
"id": "GHSA-w759-3hj5-qw74",
"modified": "2024-02-09T03:33:00Z",
"published": "2024-02-05T06:30:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-20013"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://corp.mediatek.com/product-security-bulletin/February-2024"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W77H-76XC-792Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-12 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-12 15:30Faleemi Desktop Software 1.8 contains a local buffer overflow vulnerability in the System Setup dialog that allows attackers to bypass DEP protections through structured exception handling exploitation. Attackers can inject a crafted payload into the Save Path for Snapshot and Record file field to trigger a buffer overflow and execute arbitrary code via ROP chain gadgets.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-25691"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-12T13:16:32Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Faleemi Desktop Software 1.8 contains a local buffer overflow vulnerability in the System Setup dialog that allows attackers to bypass DEP protections through structured exception handling exploitation. Attackers can inject a crafted payload into the Save Path for Snapshot and Record file field to trigger a buffer overflow and execute arbitrary code via ROP chain gadgets.",
"id": "GHSA-w77h-76xc-792q",
"modified": "2026-04-12T15:30:25Z",
"published": "2026-04-12T15:30:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-25691"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46269"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.faleemi.com"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/faleemi-desktop-software-local-buffer-overflow-seh-dep-bypass"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-W77P-V2RP-VMV8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-01 15:31 – Updated: 2025-05-07 15:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
arm64: entry: avoid kprobe recursion
The cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler() function is called when handling debug exceptions (and synchronous exceptions from BRK instructions), and so is called when a probed function executes. If the compiler does not inline cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler(), it can be probed.
If cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler() is probed, any debug exception or software breakpoint exception will result in recursive exceptions leading to a stack overflow. This can be triggered with the ftrace multiple_probes selftest, and as per the example splat below.
This is a regression caused by commit:
6459b8469753e9fe ("arm64: entry: consolidate Cortex-A76 erratum 1463225 workaround")
... which removed the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() annotation associated with the function.
My intent was that cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler() would be inlined into its caller, el1_dbg(), which is marked noinstr and cannot be probed. Mark cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler() as __always_inline to ensure this.
Example splat prior to this patch (with recursive entries elided):
| # echo p cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events | # echo p do_el0_svc >> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events | # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/enable | Insufficient stack space to handle exception! | ESR: 0x0000000096000047 -- DABT (current EL) | FAR: 0xffff800009cefff0 | Task stack: [0xffff800009cf0000..0xffff800009cf4000] | IRQ stack: [0xffff800008000000..0xffff800008004000] | Overflow stack: [0xffff00007fbc00f0..0xffff00007fbc10f0] | CPU: 0 PID: 145 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.0.0 #2 | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | pstate: 604003c5 (nZCv DAIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) | pc : arm64_enter_el1_dbg+0x4/0x20 | lr : el1_dbg+0x24/0x5c | sp : ffff800009cf0000 | x29: ffff800009cf0000 x28: ffff000002c74740 x27: 0000000000000000 | x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 | x23: 00000000604003c5 x22: ffff80000801745c x21: 0000aaaac95ac068 | x20: 00000000f2000004 x19: ffff800009cf0040 x18: 0000000000000000 | x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000 | x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 | x11: 0000000000000010 x10: ffff800008c87190 x9 : ffff800008ca00d0 | x8 : 000000000000003c x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000 | x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 00000000000043a4 | x2 : 00000000f2000004 x1 : 00000000f2000004 x0 : ffff800009cf0040 | Kernel panic - not syncing: kernel stack overflow | CPU: 0 PID: 145 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.0.0 #2 | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | Call trace: | dump_backtrace+0xe4/0x104 | show_stack+0x18/0x4c | dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0x7c | dump_stack+0x18/0x38 | panic+0x14c/0x338 | test_taint+0x0/0x2c | panic_bad_stack+0x104/0x118 | handle_bad_stack+0x34/0x48 | __bad_stack+0x78/0x7c | arm64_enter_el1_dbg+0x4/0x20 | el1h_64_sync_handler+0x40/0x98 | el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68 | cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler+0x0/0x34 ... | el1h_64_sync_handler+0x40/0x98 | el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68 | cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler+0x0/0x34 ... | el1h_64_sync_handler+0x40/0x98 | el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68 | cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler+0x0/0x34 | el1h_64_sync_handler+0x40/0x98 | el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68 | do_el0_svc+0x0/0x28 | el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 | el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 | Kernel Offset: disabled | CPU features: 0x0080,00005021,19001080 | Memory Limit: none | ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: kernel stack overflow ]---
With this patch, cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler() is inlined into el1_dbg(), and el1_dbg() cannot be probed:
| # echo p cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events | sh: write error: No such file or directory | # grep -w cortex_a76_errat ---truncated---
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-49888"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-01T15:16:13Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\narm64: entry: avoid kprobe recursion\n\nThe cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler() function is called when\nhandling debug exceptions (and synchronous exceptions from BRK\ninstructions), and so is called when a probed function executes. If the\ncompiler does not inline cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler(), it\ncan be probed.\n\nIf cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler() is probed, any debug\nexception or software breakpoint exception will result in recursive\nexceptions leading to a stack overflow. This can be triggered with the\nftrace multiple_probes selftest, and as per the example splat below.\n\nThis is a regression caused by commit:\n\n 6459b8469753e9fe (\"arm64: entry: consolidate Cortex-A76 erratum 1463225 workaround\")\n\n... which removed the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() annotation associated with the\nfunction.\n\nMy intent was that cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler() would be\ninlined into its caller, el1_dbg(), which is marked noinstr and cannot\nbe probed. Mark cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler() as\n__always_inline to ensure this.\n\nExample splat prior to this patch (with recursive entries elided):\n\n| # echo p cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler \u003e /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events\n| # echo p do_el0_svc \u003e\u003e /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events\n| # echo 1 \u003e /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/enable\n| Insufficient stack space to handle exception!\n| ESR: 0x0000000096000047 -- DABT (current EL)\n| FAR: 0xffff800009cefff0\n| Task stack: [0xffff800009cf0000..0xffff800009cf4000]\n| IRQ stack: [0xffff800008000000..0xffff800008004000]\n| Overflow stack: [0xffff00007fbc00f0..0xffff00007fbc10f0]\n| CPU: 0 PID: 145 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.0.0 #2\n| Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)\n| pstate: 604003c5 (nZCv DAIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n| pc : arm64_enter_el1_dbg+0x4/0x20\n| lr : el1_dbg+0x24/0x5c\n| sp : ffff800009cf0000\n| x29: ffff800009cf0000 x28: ffff000002c74740 x27: 0000000000000000\n| x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000\n| x23: 00000000604003c5 x22: ffff80000801745c x21: 0000aaaac95ac068\n| x20: 00000000f2000004 x19: ffff800009cf0040 x18: 0000000000000000\n| x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000\n| x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000\n| x11: 0000000000000010 x10: ffff800008c87190 x9 : ffff800008ca00d0\n| x8 : 000000000000003c x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000\n| x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 00000000000043a4\n| x2 : 00000000f2000004 x1 : 00000000f2000004 x0 : ffff800009cf0040\n| Kernel panic - not syncing: kernel stack overflow\n| CPU: 0 PID: 145 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.0.0 #2\n| Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)\n| Call trace:\n| dump_backtrace+0xe4/0x104\n| show_stack+0x18/0x4c\n| dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0x7c\n| dump_stack+0x18/0x38\n| panic+0x14c/0x338\n| test_taint+0x0/0x2c\n| panic_bad_stack+0x104/0x118\n| handle_bad_stack+0x34/0x48\n| __bad_stack+0x78/0x7c\n| arm64_enter_el1_dbg+0x4/0x20\n| el1h_64_sync_handler+0x40/0x98\n| el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68\n| cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler+0x0/0x34\n...\n| el1h_64_sync_handler+0x40/0x98\n| el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68\n| cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler+0x0/0x34\n...\n| el1h_64_sync_handler+0x40/0x98\n| el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68\n| cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler+0x0/0x34\n| el1h_64_sync_handler+0x40/0x98\n| el1h_64_sync+0x64/0x68\n| do_el0_svc+0x0/0x28\n| el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0\n| el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190\n| Kernel Offset: disabled\n| CPU features: 0x0080,00005021,19001080\n| Memory Limit: none\n| ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: kernel stack overflow ]---\n\nWith this patch, cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler() is inlined\ninto el1_dbg(), and el1_dbg() cannot be probed:\n\n| # echo p cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler \u003e /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events\n| sh: write error: No such file or directory\n| # grep -w cortex_a76_errat\n---truncated---",
"id": "GHSA-w77p-v2rp-vmv8",
"modified": "2025-05-07T15:31:26Z",
"published": "2025-05-01T15:31:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49888"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/024f4b2e1f874934943eb2d3d288ebc52c79f55c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/71d6c33fe223255f4416a01514da2c0bc3e283e7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/db66629d43b2d12cb43b004a4ca6be1d03228e97"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W78F-68QF-58QW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:01 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:01An exploitable buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the camera 'update' feature of video-core's HTTP server of Samsung SmartThings Hub STH-ETH-250 - Firmware version 0.20.17. The video-core process incorrectly extracts fields from a user-controlled JSON payload, leading to a buffer overflow on the stack. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-3904"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119",
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-08-27T15:29:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "An exploitable buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the camera \u0027update\u0027 feature of video-core\u0027s HTTP server of Samsung SmartThings Hub STH-ETH-250 - Firmware version 0.20.17. The video-core process incorrectly extracts fields from a user-controlled JSON payload, leading to a buffer overflow on the stack. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-w78f-68qf-58qw",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:01:59Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:01:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-3904"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2018-0574"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W78J-W263-GJWC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-03 03:30 – Updated: 2024-05-03 03:30D-Link DAP-2622 DDP Set IPv6 Address Auth Username Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of D-Link DAP-2622 routers. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability.
The specific flaw exists within the DDP service. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-20092.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-37314"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-121",
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-05-03T02:15:41Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "D-Link DAP-2622 DDP Set IPv6 Address Auth Username Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of D-Link DAP-2622 routers. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability.\n\nThe specific flaw exists within the DDP service. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-20092.",
"id": "GHSA-w78j-w263-gjwc",
"modified": "2024-05-03T03:30:53Z",
"published": "2024-05-03T03:30:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-37314"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://supportannouncement.us.dlink.com/announcement/publication.aspx?name=SAP10349"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-23-1268"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-3
Strategy: Language Selection
- Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer.
- Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
Mitigation MIT-4.1
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Mitigation MIT-10
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.
- D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
Mitigation MIT-9
- Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory:
- Double check that the buffer is as large as specified.
- When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string.
- Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a loop and make sure there is no danger of writing past the allocated space.
- If necessary, truncate all input strings to a reasonable length before passing them to the copy and concatenation functions.
Mitigation MIT-11
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
- Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as "rebasing" (for Windows) and "prelinking" (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
- For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].
Mitigation MIT-12
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment.
- For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].
Mitigation MIT-13
Replace unbounded copy functions with analogous functions that support length arguments, such as strcpy with strncpy. Create these if they are not available.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.