CWE-787
Weakness Allowed-with-ReviewOut-of-bounds Write
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Dimensions
- Behavior-Type: Write
- Resource-Type: Memory Buffer
- Resource-Property: Out-of-bounds
Mapping guidance
This CWE entry is at the Base level of abstraction, which is a preferred level of abstraction for mapping to the root causes of vulnerabilities. However, closer examination is required.
While this CWE is allowed for mapping, it has more specific children that might be a better fit. Carefully read both the name and description to ensure that this mapping is appropriate. Consider the root cause errors that have led to the out-of-bounds write by examining "CanFollow" relationships for this entry.
Relationships and members
Modes of introduction
Detection methods
Automated Static Analysis
This weakness can often be detected using automated static analysis tools. Many modern tools use data flow analysis or constraint-based techniques to minimize the number of false positives.
Automated static analysis generally does not account for environmental considerations when reporting out-of-bounds memory operations. This can make it difficult for users to determine which warnings should be investigated first. For example, an analysis tool might report buffer overflows that originate from command line arguments in a program that is not expected to run with setuid or other special privileges.
Effectiveness: High
Detection techniques for buffer-related errors are more mature than for most other weakness types.
Automated Dynamic Analysis
This weakness can be detected using dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the software using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The software's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Automated Dynamic Analysis
Use tools that are integrated during compilation to insert runtime error-checking mechanisms related to memory safety errors, such as AddressSanitizer (ASan) for C/C++ [REF-1518].
Effectiveness: Moderate
Crafted inputs are necessary to reach the code containing the error, such as generated by fuzzers. Also, these tools may reduce performance, and they only report the error condition - not the original mistake that led to the error.
Content history
Suggested mappings to ISA/IEC 62443.
Provided diagram to improve CWE usability
updated Demonstrative_Examples
updated Relationships
updated Common_Consequences
updated Demonstrative_Examples
updated Relationships
updated Description
updated Applicable_Platforms, Demonstrative_Examples, Detection_Factors, Likelihood_of_Exploit, Observed_Examples, Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships, Time_of_Introduction
updated Observed_Examples, Relationships
updated Observed_Examples
updated Alternate_Terms, Demonstrative_Examples, Observed_Examples, Relationships
updated Relationships
updated Demonstrative_Examples
updated Demonstrative_Examples, Potential_Mitigations, Relationships
updated Observed_Examples, Relationships
updated Applicable_Platforms
updated Alternate_Terms, Demonstrative_Examples, Description
updated Potential_Mitigations, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Mapping_Notes, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
updated Demonstrative_Examples
updated Alternate_Terms, Common_Consequences, Description, Diagram, Weakness_Ordinalities
updated Observed_Examples, Relationships
updated Observed_Examples, Relationships
updated Affected_Resources, Functional_Areas, References
updated Applicable_Platforms, Detection_Factors, References, Relationships
updated Mapping_Notes
updated Dimensions, Observed_Examples, References, Relationships, Taxonomy_Mappings
17026 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-QXGW-7WHG-72J2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:22 – Updated: 2025-11-25 18:32An out of bounds memory write while processing Vorbis audio data was reported through the Pwn2Own contest. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 59.0.1, Firefox ESR < 52.7.2, and Thunderbird < 52.7.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-5146"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-06-11T21:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An out of bounds memory write while processing Vorbis audio data was reported through the Pwn2Own contest. This vulnerability affects Firefox \u003c 59.0.1, Firefox ESR \u003c 52.7.2, and Thunderbird \u003c 52.7.",
"id": "GHSA-qxgw-7whg-72j2",
"modified": "2025-11-25T18:32:13Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T01:22:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-5146"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2018-09"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2018-08"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4155"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4143"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4140"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3604-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3599-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3545-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-13"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/04/msg00033.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/03/msg00029.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/03/msg00022.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1446062"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1058"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0649"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0648"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0647"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0549"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103432"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040544"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QXH9-R8XW-7V99
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:17 – Updated: 2025-04-22 18:45In OpenEXR 2.2.0, an invalid write of size 8 in the storeSSE function in ImfOptimizedPixelReading.h could cause the application to crash or execute arbitrary code.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "OpenEXR"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.2.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-9111"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-04-22T18:45:29Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2017-05-21T18:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In OpenEXR 2.2.0, an invalid write of size 8 in the storeSSE function in ImfOptimizedPixelReading.h could cause the application to crash or execute arbitrary code.",
"id": "GHSA-qxh9-r8xw-7v99",
"modified": "2025-04-22T18:45:30Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:17:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9111"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openexr/openexr/issues/232"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openexr/openexr/pull/233"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openexr/openexr/releases/tag/v2.2.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/08/msg00056.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4148-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4339-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4755"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00060.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00000.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/05/12/5"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "OpenEXR invalid write"
}
GHSA-QXHH-6R2J-RGM9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-12-05 00:31 – Updated: 2023-12-08 18:30In onTransact of IncidentService.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to memory corruption. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-40091"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-12-04T23:15:24Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In onTransact of IncidentService.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to memory corruption. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.",
"id": "GHSA-qxhh-6r2j-rgm9",
"modified": "2023-12-08T18:30:40Z",
"published": "2023-12-05T00:31:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-40091"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://android.googlesource.com/platform/frameworks/base/+/0ec7b119d41adcbba23f9349e16de9e7e11683f6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2023-12-01"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QXJ9-R243-8955
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-17 12:32 – Updated: 2024-04-17 12:32A vulnerability was found in Tenda AC500 2.0.1.9(1307). It has been rated as critical. This issue affects the function formSetCfm of the file /goform/setcfm. The manipulation of the argument funcpara1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-261143. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-3907"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-121",
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-17T11:15:12Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was found in Tenda AC500 2.0.1.9(1307). It has been rated as critical. This issue affects the function formSetCfm of the file /goform/setcfm. The manipulation of the argument funcpara1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-261143. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.",
"id": "GHSA-qxj9-r243-8955",
"modified": "2024-04-17T12:32:05Z",
"published": "2024-04-17T12:32:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-3907"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/abcdefg-png/IoT-vulnerable/blob/main/Tenda/AC500/formSetCfm.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.261143"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.261143"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.313802"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QXJV-WHW7-VP66
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:03 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:03A vulnerability has been identified in SPPA-T3000 Application Server (All versions). An attacker with valid authentication at the RMI interface could be able to gain remote code execution through an unsecured file upload. Please note that an attacker needs to have access to the Application Highway in order to exploit this vulnerability. At the time of advisory publication no public exploitation of this security vulnerability was known.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-18288"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-12-12T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability has been identified in SPPA-T3000 Application Server (All versions). An attacker with valid authentication at the RMI interface could be able to gain remote code execution through an unsecured file upload. Please note that an attacker needs to have access to the Application Highway in order to exploit this vulnerability. At the time of advisory publication no public exploitation of this security vulnerability was known.",
"id": "GHSA-qxjv-whw7-vp66",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:03:23Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:03:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-18288"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-451445.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155665/Siemens-Security-Advisory-SPPA-T3000-Code-Execution.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-QXMJ-3C5H-546C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:21 – Updated: 2023-09-28 20:24A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0806, CVE-2019-0810, CVE-2019-0812, CVE-2019-0829, CVE-2019-0860.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "Microsoft.ChakraCore"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.11.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-0861"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-07-19T19:07:40Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2019-04-09T21:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka \u0027Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability\u0027. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0806, CVE-2019-0810, CVE-2019-0812, CVE-2019-0829, CVE-2019-0860.",
"id": "GHSA-qxmj-3c5h-546c",
"modified": "2023-09-28T20:24:45Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:21:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-0861"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/chakra-core/ChakraCore/pull/6087"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/chakra-core/ChakraCore/commit/b481337f2ae6e92efd919692c6691996947f49ec"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/chakra-core/ChakraCore"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2019-0861"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20210125022152/http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107724"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "ChakraCore Memory Corruption Vulnerability"
}
GHSA-QXMR-4249-FW36
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-10 12:30 – Updated: 2026-02-10 12:30A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2512), Simcenter Nastran (All versions < V2512). The affected applications contains an out of bounds write vulnerability while parsing specially crafted XDB files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-23715"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-10T10:15:58Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions \u003c V2512), Simcenter Nastran (All versions \u003c V2512). The affected applications contains an out of bounds write vulnerability while parsing specially crafted XDB files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process.",
"id": "GHSA-qxmr-4249-fw36",
"modified": "2026-02-10T12:30:27Z",
"published": "2026-02-10T12:30:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23715"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-965753.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-QXP7-W377-C4F4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:04 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:04A vulnerability has been identified in Solid Edge SE2020 (All Versions < 2020MP14), Solid Edge SE2021 (All Versions < SE2021MP5). The jutil.dll library lacks proper validation of user-supplied data when parsing DFT files. This could result in an out of bounds write past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-12994)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-31343"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-06-08T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability has been identified in Solid Edge SE2020 (All Versions \u003c 2020MP14), Solid Edge SE2021 (All Versions \u003c SE2021MP5). The jutil.dll library lacks proper validation of user-supplied data when parsing DFT files. This could result in an out of bounds write past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-12994)",
"id": "GHSA-qxp7-w377-c4f4",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:04:17Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:04:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-31343"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-208356.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-21-159-09"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-21-999"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-QXP9-W6X3-F25V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-06 12:30 – Updated: 2026-02-06 12:30A vulnerability was detected in IP-COM W30AP up to 1.0.0.11(1340). Affected by this issue is the function R7WebsSecurityHandler of the file /goform/wx3auth of the component POST Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument data results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-2017"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119",
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-06T12:16:26Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was detected in IP-COM W30AP up to 1.0.0.11(1340). Affected by this issue is the function R7WebsSecurityHandler of the file /goform/wx3auth of the component POST Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument data results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.",
"id": "GHSA-qxp9-w6x3-f25v",
"modified": "2026-02-06T12:30:26Z",
"published": "2026-02-06T12:30:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-2017"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitee.com/GXB0_0/iot-vul/blob/master/IP-COM/W30AP/wx3auth-sprintf.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitee.com/GXB0_0/iot-vul/blob/master/IP-COM/W30AP/wx3auth-sprintf.md#poc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.344599"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.344599"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.744062"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.744063"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-QXQC-QJ6P-CWJV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-09-05 09:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 07:28Memory corruption in WLAN HAL while handling command streams through WMI interfaces.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-28565"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-129",
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-09-05T07:15:14Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Memory corruption in WLAN HAL while handling command streams through WMI interfaces.",
"id": "GHSA-qxqc-qj6p-cwjv",
"modified": "2024-04-04T07:28:07Z",
"published": "2023-09-05T09:30:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-28565"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.qualcomm.com/company/product-security/bulletins/september-2023-bulletin"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-3
Strategy: Language Selection
- Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer.
- Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
Mitigation MIT-4.1
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Mitigation MIT-10
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.
- D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
Mitigation MIT-9
- Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory:
- Double check that the buffer is as large as specified.
- When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string.
- Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a loop and make sure there is no danger of writing past the allocated space.
- If necessary, truncate all input strings to a reasonable length before passing them to the copy and concatenation functions.
Mitigation MIT-11
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
- Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as "rebasing" (for Windows) and "prelinking" (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
- For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].
Mitigation MIT-12
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment.
- For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].
Mitigation MIT-13
Replace unbounded copy functions with analogous functions that support length arguments, such as strcpy with strncpy. Create these if they are not available.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.