Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-345
DiscouragedInsufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft
The product does not sufficiently verify the origin or authenticity of data, in a way that causes it to accept invalid data.
944 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2025-1944 (GCVE-0-2025-1944)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-03-10 11:30 – Updated: 2025-12-29 14:18
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
picklescan ZIP archive manipulation attack leads to crash
Summary
picklescan before 0.0.23 is vulnerable to a ZIP archive manipulation attack that causes it to crash when attempting to extract and scan PyTorch model archives. By modifying the filename in the ZIP header while keeping the original filename in the directory listing, an attacker can make PickleScan raise a BadZipFile error. However, PyTorch's more forgiving ZIP implementation still allows the model to be loaded, enabling malicious payloads to bypass detection.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.sonatype.com/security-advisories/cve-… | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/security… | vendor-advisory |
| https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/commit/e… | patch |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| mmaitre314 | picklescan |
Affected:
0.0.1 , < 0.0.23
(python)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-1944",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-03-10T12:08:11.236471Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-10T12:09:36.612Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "picklescan",
"vendor": "mmaitre314",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "0.0.23",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.0.1",
"versionType": "python"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Trevor Madge (@madgetr) of Sonatype"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "picklescan before 0.0.23 is vulnerable to a ZIP archive manipulation attack that causes it to crash when attempting to extract and scan PyTorch model archives. By modifying the filename in the ZIP header while keeping the original filename in the directory listing, an attacker can make PickleScan raise a BadZipFile error. However, PyTorch\u0027s more forgiving ZIP implementation still allows the model to be loaded, enabling malicious payloads to bypass detection.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "picklescan before 0.0.23 is vulnerable to a ZIP archive manipulation attack that causes it to crash when attempting to extract and scan PyTorch model archives. By modifying the filename in the ZIP header while keeping the original filename in the directory listing, an attacker can make PickleScan raise a BadZipFile error. However, PyTorch\u0027s more forgiving ZIP implementation still allows the model to be loaded, enabling malicious payloads to bypass detection."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:L/SA:L",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-29T14:18:19.513Z",
"orgId": "103e4ec9-0a87-450b-af77-479448ddef11",
"shortName": "Sonatype"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.sonatype.com/security-advisories/cve-2025-1944"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/security/advisories/GHSA-7q5r-7gvp-wc82"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/mmaitre314/picklescan/commit/e58e45e0d9e091159c1554f9b04828bbb40b9781"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "picklescan ZIP archive manipulation attack leads to crash",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "103e4ec9-0a87-450b-af77-479448ddef11",
"assignerShortName": "Sonatype",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-1944",
"datePublished": "2025-03-10T11:30:32.896Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-03-04T12:59:33.809Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-29T14:18:19.513Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-1108 (GCVE-0-2025-1108)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-02-07 13:40 – Updated: 2025-02-12 20:51
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Insufficient data authenticity vulnerability in Janto
Summary
Insufficient data authenticity verification vulnerability in Janto, versions prior to r12. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to modify the content of emails sent to reset the password. To exploit the vulnerability, the attacker must create a POST request by injecting malicious content into the ‘Xml’ parameter on the ‘/public/cgi/Gateway.php’ endpoint.
Severity
8.6 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
1 reference
Date Public
2025-02-07 11:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-1108",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-02-07T14:29:13.648271Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-12T20:51:40.433Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Janto",
"vendor": "Impronta",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "r12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Guzm\u00e1n Fern\u00e1ndez Oca\u00f1a"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-02-07T11:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Insufficient data authenticity verification vulnerability in Janto, versions prior to r12. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to modify the content of emails sent to reset the password. To exploit the vulnerability, the attacker must create a POST request by injecting malicious content into the \u2018Xml\u2019 parameter on the \u2018/public/cgi/Gateway.php\u2019 endpoint."
}
],
"value": "Insufficient data authenticity verification vulnerability in Janto, versions prior to r12. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to modify the content of emails sent to reset the password. To exploit the vulnerability, the attacker must create a POST request by injecting malicious content into the \u2018Xml\u2019 parameter on the \u2018/public/cgi/Gateway.php\u2019 endpoint."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-07T13:40:09.270Z",
"orgId": "0cbda920-cd7f-484a-8e76-bf7f4b7f4516",
"shortName": "INCIBE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.incibe.es/en/incibe-cert/notices/aviso/multiple-vulnerabilities-janto"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "With the implemented patches by the Impronta team, the detected vulnerabilities have been fixed. All customers using this product in SaaS mode have been upgraded to version r12 which fixes these issues."
}
],
"value": "With the implemented patches by the Impronta team, the detected vulnerabilities have been fixed. All customers using this product in SaaS mode have been upgraded to version r12 which fixes these issues."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Insufficient data authenticity vulnerability in Janto",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "0cbda920-cd7f-484a-8e76-bf7f4b7f4516",
"assignerShortName": "INCIBE",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-1108",
"datePublished": "2025-02-07T13:40:09.270Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-02-07T12:01:52.466Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-12T20:51:40.433Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-0149 (GCVE-0-2025-0149)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-03-11 17:04 – Updated: 2025-03-11 19:18
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Zoom Apps - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Summary
Insufficient verification of data authenticity in some Zoom Workplace Apps may allow an unprivileged user to conduct a denial of service via network access.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zoom Communications, Inc | Zoom Apps |
Affected:
See references
|
Date Public
2025-03-11 12:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-0149",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-03-11T19:18:21.457582Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-11T19:18:34.860Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Windows",
"MacOS",
"Linux",
"iOS",
"Android"
],
"product": "Zoom Apps",
"vendor": "Zoom Communications, Inc",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "See references"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-03-11T12:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Insufficient verification of data authenticity in some Zoom Workplace Apps may allow an unprivileged user to conduct a denial of service via network access."
}
],
"value": "Insufficient verification of data authenticity in some Zoom Workplace Apps may allow an unprivileged user to conduct a denial of service via network access."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-11T17:11:46.219Z",
"orgId": "99b9af0d-a833-4a5d-9e2f-8b1324f35351",
"shortName": "Zoom"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.zoom.com/en/trust/security-bulletin/zsb-25008/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Zoom Apps - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "99b9af0d-a833-4a5d-9e2f-8b1324f35351",
"assignerShortName": "Zoom",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-0149",
"datePublished": "2025-03-11T17:04:02.453Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-12-23T21:42:58.197Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-11T19:18:34.860Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-58267 (GCVE-0-2024-58267)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-02 12:08 – Updated: 2026-02-26 17:48
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Rancher CLI SAML authentication is vulnerable to phishing attacks
Summary
A vulnerability has been identified within Rancher Manager whereby the SAML authentication from the Rancher CLI tool is vulnerable to phishing attacks. The custom authentication protocol for SAML-based providers can be abused to steal Rancher’s authentication tokens.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Date Public
2025-09-26 11:02
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-58267",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-03T03:55:36.714841Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T17:48:22.411Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "github.com/rancher/rancher",
"product": "rancher",
"vendor": "SUSE",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.12.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.12.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.11.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.11.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.10.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.10.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.9.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.9.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-09-26T11:02:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A vulnerability has been identified within Rancher Manager whereby the SAML authentication from the Rancher CLI tool is vulnerable to phishing attacks. The custom authentication protocol for SAML-based providers can be abused to steal Rancher\u2019s authentication tokens."
}
],
"value": "A vulnerability has been identified within Rancher Manager whereby the SAML authentication from the Rancher CLI tool is vulnerable to phishing attacks. The custom authentication protocol for SAML-based providers can be abused to steal Rancher\u2019s authentication tokens."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-02T12:08:30.507Z",
"orgId": "404e59f5-483d-4b8a-8e7a-e67604dd8afb",
"shortName": "suse"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2024-58267"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/rancher/rancher/security/advisories/GHSA-v3vj-5868-2ch2"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Rancher CLI SAML authentication is vulnerable to phishing attacks",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "404e59f5-483d-4b8a-8e7a-e67604dd8afb",
"assignerShortName": "suse",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-58267",
"datePublished": "2025-10-02T12:08:30.507Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-09-04T04:04:22.186Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T17:48:22.411Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-55929 (GCVE-0-2024-55929)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-01-23 17:30 – Updated: 2025-02-24 17:17
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Mail spoofing
Summary
A mail spoofing vulnerability in Xerox Workplace Suite allows attackers to forge email headers, making it appear as though messages are sent from trusted sources.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xerox | Xerox Workplace Suite |
Affected:
0 , < 5.6.701.9
(custom)
|
Date Public
2025-01-23 17:26
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-55929",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-01-23T19:01:12.854666Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-23T19:01:20.686Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"platforms": [
"Windows"
],
"product": "Xerox Workplace Suite",
"vendor": "Xerox",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.6.701.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-01-23T17:26:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A mail spoofing vulnerability in Xerox Workplace Suite allows attackers to forge email headers, making it appear as though messages are sent from trusted sources."
}
],
"value": "A mail spoofing vulnerability in Xerox Workplace Suite allows attackers to forge email headers, making it appear as though messages are sent from trusted sources."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-151",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-151 Identity Spoofing"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-24T17:17:09.394Z",
"orgId": "10b61619-3869-496c-8a1e-f291b0e71e3f",
"shortName": "Xerox"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://securitydocs.business.xerox.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Xerox-Security-Bulletin-XRX25-002-for-Xerox%C2%AE-WorkplaceSuite%C2%AE.pdf"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Mail spoofing",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "10b61619-3869-496c-8a1e-f291b0e71e3f",
"assignerShortName": "Xerox",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-55929",
"datePublished": "2025-01-23T17:30:34.224Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-12-13T14:30:30.207Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-24T17:17:09.394Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-54111 (GCVE-0-2024-54111)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-12-12 12:06 – Updated: 2024-12-12 15:02
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
Read/Write vulnerability in the image decoding module
Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability will affect availability.
Severity
5.7 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
1 reference
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-54111",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-12-12T15:02:38.079603Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-12T15:02:45.095Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "HarmonyOS",
"vendor": "Huawei",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Read/Write vulnerability in the image decoding module\u003cbr\u003eImpact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability will affect availability."
}
],
"value": "Read/Write vulnerability in the image decoding module\nImpact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability will affect availability."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-12T12:06:25.502Z",
"orgId": "25ac1063-e409-4190-8079-24548c77ea2e",
"shortName": "huawei"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletin/2024/12/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "25ac1063-e409-4190-8079-24548c77ea2e",
"assignerShortName": "huawei",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-54111",
"datePublished": "2024-12-12T12:06:25.502Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-11-29T02:34:46.791Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-12T15:02:45.095Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-53259 (GCVE-0-2024-53259)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-12-02 16:12 – Updated: 2024-12-02 19:28
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
quic-go affected by an ICMP Packet Too Large Injection Attack on Linux
Summary
quic-go is an implementation of the QUIC protocol in Go. An off-path attacker can inject an ICMP Packet Too Large packet. Since affected quic-go versions used IP_PMTUDISC_DO, the kernel would then return a "message too large" error on sendmsg, i.e. when quic-go attempts to send a packet that exceeds the MTU claimed in that ICMP packet. By setting this value to smaller than 1200 bytes (the minimum MTU for QUIC), the attacker can disrupt a QUIC connection. Crucially, this can be done after completion of the handshake, thereby circumventing any TCP fallback that might be implemented on the application layer (for example, many browsers fall back to HTTP over TCP if they're unable to establish a QUIC connection). The attacker needs to at least know the client's IP and port tuple to mount an attack. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.48.2.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/pull/4729 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/commit/ca31dd3… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/releases/tag/v0.48.2 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-53259",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-12-02T19:27:58.329919Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-02T19:28:08.531Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "quic-go",
"vendor": "quic-go",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.48.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "quic-go is an implementation of the QUIC protocol in Go. An off-path attacker can inject an ICMP Packet Too Large packet. Since affected quic-go versions used IP_PMTUDISC_DO, the kernel would then return a \"message too large\" error on sendmsg, i.e. when quic-go attempts to send a packet that exceeds the MTU claimed in that ICMP packet. By setting this value to smaller than 1200 bytes (the minimum MTU for QUIC), the attacker can disrupt a QUIC connection. Crucially, this can be done after completion of the handshake, thereby circumventing any TCP fallback that might be implemented on the application layer (for example, many browsers fall back to HTTP over TCP if they\u0027re unable to establish a QUIC connection). The attacker needs to at least know the client\u0027s IP and port tuple to mount an attack. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.48.2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-02T16:12:40.605Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/security/advisories/GHSA-px8v-pp82-rcvr",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/security/advisories/GHSA-px8v-pp82-rcvr"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/pull/4729",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/pull/4729"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/commit/ca31dd355cbe5fc6c5807992d9d1149c66c96a50",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/commit/ca31dd355cbe5fc6c5807992d9d1149c66c96a50"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/releases/tag/v0.48.2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/releases/tag/v0.48.2"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-px8v-pp82-rcvr",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "quic-go affected by an ICMP Packet Too Large Injection Attack on Linux"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-53259",
"datePublished": "2024-12-02T16:12:40.605Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-11-19T20:08:14.480Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-02T19:28:08.531Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-52548 (GCVE-0-2024-52548)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-12-03 17:29 – Updated: 2024-12-03 21:04
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Lorex 2K Indoor Wi-Fi Security Camera - Code signing bypass
Summary
An attacker who can execute arbitrary Operating Systems commands, can bypass code signing enforcements in the kernel, and execute arbitrary native code. This vulnerability has been resolved in firmware version 2.800.0000000.8.R.20241111.
Severity
6.7 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/sfewer-r7/LorexExploit | exploit |
| https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2024/12/03/lorex… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lorex | 2K Indoor Wi-Fi Security Camera |
Affected:
0 , < 2.800.0000000.8.R.20241111
(custom)
|
|
| lorextechnology | w461asc-e_firmware |
Affected:
0 , < 2.800.0000000.8.r.20241111
(custom)
cpe:2.3:o:lorextechnology:w461asc-e_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
Date Public
2024-12-03 17:27
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:lorextechnology:w461asc-e_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "w461asc-e_firmware",
"vendor": "lorextechnology",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.800.0000000.8.r.20241111",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-52548",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-12-03T18:28:51.593704Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-03T18:37:54.197Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "2K Indoor Wi-Fi Security Camera",
"vendor": "Lorex",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.800.0000000.8.R.20241111",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2024-12-03T17:27:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An attacker who can execute arbitrary Operating Systems commands, can bypass code signing enforcements in the kernel, and execute arbitrary native code. This vulnerability has been resolved in firmware version 2.800.0000000.8.R.20241111.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An attacker who can execute arbitrary Operating Systems commands, can bypass code signing enforcements in the kernel, and execute arbitrary native code. This vulnerability has been resolved in firmware version 2.800.0000000.8.R.20241111."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-03T21:04:00.985Z",
"orgId": "9974b330-7714-4307-a722-5648477acda7",
"shortName": "rapid7"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/sfewer-r7/LorexExploit"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2024/12/03/lorex-2k-indoor-wi-fi-security-camera-multiple-vulnerabilities-fixed/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Lorex 2K Indoor Wi-Fi Security Camera - Code signing bypass",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9974b330-7714-4307-a722-5648477acda7",
"assignerShortName": "rapid7",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-52548",
"datePublished": "2024-12-03T17:29:59.241Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-11-12T13:42:42.324Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-03T21:04:00.985Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-48916 (GCVE-0-2024-48916)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-07-30 19:45 – Updated: 2025-07-30 19:54
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Ceph is vulnerable to authentication bypass through RadosGW
Summary
Ceph is a distributed object, block, and file storage platform. In versions 19.2.3 and below, it is possible to send an JWT that has "none" as JWT alg. And by doing so the JWT signature is not checked. The vulnerability is most likely in the RadosGW OIDC provider. As of time of publication, a known patched version has yet to be published.
Severity
8.1 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/ceph/ceph/security/advisories/… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-48916",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-30T19:54:31.667804Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-30T19:54:42.022Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "ceph",
"vendor": "ceph",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c= 19.2.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Ceph is a distributed object, block, and file storage platform. In versions 19.2.3 and below, it is possible to send an JWT that has \"none\" as JWT alg. And by doing so the JWT signature is not checked. The vulnerability is most likely in the RadosGW OIDC provider. As of time of publication, a known patched version has yet to be published."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-30T19:45:00.454Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/security/advisories/GHSA-5g9m-mmp6-93mq",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ceph/ceph/security/advisories/GHSA-5g9m-mmp6-93mq"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-5g9m-mmp6-93mq",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Ceph is vulnerable to authentication bypass through RadosGW"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-48916",
"datePublished": "2025-07-30T19:45:00.454Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-10-09T22:06:46.172Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-30T19:54:42.022Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-47867 (GCVE-0-2024-47867)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-10-10 22:19 – Updated: 2024-10-11 15:06
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Lack of integrity check on the downloaded FRP client in Gradio
Summary
Gradio is an open-source Python package designed for quick prototyping. This vulnerability is a **lack of integrity check** on the downloaded FRP client, which could potentially allow attackers to introduce malicious code. If an attacker gains access to the remote URL from which the FRP client is downloaded, they could modify the binary without detection, as the Gradio server does not verify the file's checksum or signature. Any users utilizing the Gradio server's sharing mechanism that downloads the FRP client could be affected by this vulnerability, especially those relying on the executable binary for secure data tunneling. There is no direct workaround for this issue without upgrading. However, users can manually validate the integrity of the downloaded FRP client by implementing checksum or signature verification in their own environment to ensure the binary hasn't been tampered with.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/gradio-app/gradio/security/adv… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| gradio-app | gradio |
Affected:
< 5.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-47867",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-10-11T15:06:22.059191Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-11T15:06:32.529Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "gradio",
"vendor": "gradio-app",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 5.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Gradio is an open-source Python package designed for quick prototyping. This vulnerability is a **lack of integrity check** on the downloaded FRP client, which could potentially allow attackers to introduce malicious code. If an attacker gains access to the remote URL from which the FRP client is downloaded, they could modify the binary without detection, as the Gradio server does not verify the file\u0027s checksum or signature. Any users utilizing the Gradio server\u0027s sharing mechanism that downloads the FRP client could be affected by this vulnerability, especially those relying on the executable binary for secure data tunneling. There is no direct workaround for this issue without upgrading. However, users can manually validate the integrity of the downloaded FRP client by implementing checksum or signature verification in their own environment to ensure the binary hasn\u0027t been tampered with."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 2.1,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-10T22:19:11.631Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/gradio-app/gradio/security/advisories/GHSA-8c87-gvhj-xm8m",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gradio-app/gradio/security/advisories/GHSA-8c87-gvhj-xm8m"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-8c87-gvhj-xm8m",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Lack of integrity check on the downloaded FRP client in Gradio"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-47867",
"datePublished": "2024-10-10T22:19:11.631Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-10-04T16:00:09.629Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-11T15:06:32.529Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-141: Cache Poisoning
An attacker exploits the functionality of cache technologies to cause specific data to be cached that aids the attackers' objectives. This describes any attack whereby an attacker places incorrect or harmful material in cache. The targeted cache can be an application's cache (e.g. a web browser cache) or a public cache (e.g. a DNS or ARP cache). Until the cache is refreshed, most applications or clients will treat the corrupted cache value as valid. This can lead to a wide range of exploits including redirecting web browsers towards sites that install malware and repeatedly incorrect calculations based on the incorrect value.
CAPEC-142: DNS Cache Poisoning
A domain name server translates a domain name (such as www.example.com) into an IP address that Internet hosts use to contact Internet resources. An adversary modifies a public DNS cache to cause certain names to resolve to incorrect addresses that the adversary specifies. The result is that client applications that rely upon the targeted cache for domain name resolution will be directed not to the actual address of the specified domain name but to some other address. Adversaries can use this to herd clients to sites that install malware on the victim's computer or to masquerade as part of a Pharming attack.
CAPEC-148: Content Spoofing
An adversary modifies content to make it contain something other than what the original content producer intended while keeping the apparent source of the content unchanged. The term content spoofing is most often used to describe modification of web pages hosted by a target to display the adversary's content instead of the owner's content. However, any content can be spoofed, including the content of email messages, file transfers, or the content of other network communication protocols. Content can be modified at the source (e.g. modifying the source file for a web page) or in transit (e.g. intercepting and modifying a message between the sender and recipient). Usually, the adversary will attempt to hide the fact that the content has been modified, but in some cases, such as with web site defacement, this is not necessary. Content Spoofing can lead to malware exposure, financial fraud (if the content governs financial transactions), privacy violations, and other unwanted outcomes.
CAPEC-218: Spoofing of UDDI/ebXML Messages
An attacker spoofs a UDDI, ebXML, or similar message in order to impersonate a service provider in an e-business transaction. UDDI, ebXML, and similar standards are used to identify businesses in e-business transactions. Among other things, they identify a particular participant, WSDL information for SOAP transactions, and supported communication protocols, including security protocols. By spoofing one of these messages an attacker could impersonate a legitimate business in a transaction or could manipulate the protocols used between a client and business. This could result in disclosure of sensitive information, loss of message integrity, or even financial fraud.
CAPEC-384: Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-Middle
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the content of messages. Performing this attack can allow the attacker to gain unauthorized privileges within the application, or conduct attacks such as phishing, deceptive strategies to spread malware, or traditional web-application attacks. The techniques require use of specialized software that allow the attacker to perform adversary-in-the-middle (CAPEC-94) communications between the web browser and the remote system. Despite the use of AiTH software, the attack is actually directed at the server, as the client is one node in a series of content brokers that pass information along to the application framework. Additionally, it is not true "Adversary-in-the-Middle" attack at the network layer, but an application-layer attack the root cause of which is the master applications trust in the integrity of code supplied by the client.
CAPEC-385: Transaction or Event Tampering via Application API Manipulation
An attacker hosts or joins an event or transaction within an application framework in order to change the content of messages or items that are being exchanged. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that look authentic but may contain deceptive links, substitute one item or another, spoof an existing item and conduct a false exchange, or otherwise change the amounts or identity of what is being exchanged. The techniques require use of specialized software that allow the attacker to man-in-the-middle communications between the web browser and the remote system in order to change the content of various application elements. Often, items exchanged in game can be monetized via sales for coin, virtual dollars, etc. The purpose of the attack is for the attack to scam the victim by trapping the data packets involved the exchange and altering the integrity of the transfer process.
CAPEC-386: Application API Navigation Remapping
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the destination and/or content of links/buttons displayed to a user within API messages. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that looks authentic but contains links/buttons that point to an attacker controlled destination. Some applications make navigation remapping more difficult to detect because the actual HREF values of images, profile elements, and links/buttons are masked. One example would be to place an image in a user's photo gallery that when clicked upon redirected the user to an off-site location. Also, traditional web vulnerabilities (such as CSRF) can be constructed with remapped buttons or links. In some cases navigation remapping can be used for Phishing attacks or even means to artificially boost the page view, user site reputation, or click-fraud.
CAPEC-387: Navigation Remapping To Propagate Malicious Content
An adversary manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the content of messages and thereby circumvent the expected application logic.
CAPEC-388: Application API Button Hijacking
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the destination and/or content of buttons displayed to a user within API messages. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that looks authentic but contains buttons that point to an attacker controlled destination.
CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws
An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.
CAPEC-701: Browser in the Middle (BiTM)
An adversary exploits the inherent functionalities of a web browser, in order to establish an unnoticed remote desktop connection in the victim's browser to the adversary's system. The adversary must deploy a web client with a remote desktop session that the victim can access.