Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-120
Allowed-with-ReviewBuffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
5582 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-71934 (GCVE-0-2026-71934)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-24 17:07 – Updated: 2026-08-24 19:56
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
DrayTek VigorSwitch Multiple Models Buffer Overflow via pingtrace
Summary
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the pingtrace function. The vulnerability is caused by missing length checks when the host, count, and interval fields are concatenated into a fixed-size buffer. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-24 19:56 UTC
CWE
- CWE-120 - Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.draytek.com/about/security-advisory/m… | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/draytek-vigo… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
28 products
Date Public
2026-08-24 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-71934",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-24T19:56:12.590599Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-24T19:56:23.451Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch G2540xs",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch P2540xs",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch FX2120",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch G2282x",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.10.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch P2282x",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.10.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch Q2300x",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.10.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch PQ2300xb",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.10.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch G2542x",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.10.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch P2542x",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.10.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch P2542xh",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.10.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch PX2060",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch G1280",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch P1280",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch P1281x",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch G1282",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch P1282",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch G2121",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch P2121",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch PQ2121x",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch Q2121x",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch G2280x",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch P2280x",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch Q2200x",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch PQ2200xb",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch G2100",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch P2100",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch G2540x",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorSwitch P2540x",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.9.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorswitch_g2540xs_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.9.10",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorswitch_p2540xs_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.9.10",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorswitch_fx2120_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.9.10",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorswitch_g1282_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.9.10",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorswitch_p1282_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.9.10",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorswitch_g2121_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.9.10",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorswitch_pq2121x_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.9.10",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorswitch_q2121x_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.9.10",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorswitch_g2280x_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.9.10",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorswitch_p2280x_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.9.10",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorswitch_q2200x_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.9.10",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorswitch_pq2200xb_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.9.10",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorswitch_g2100_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.9.10",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorswitch_p2100_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.9.10",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jincheng Wang (@winmt)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Le Yu (Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Xiapu Luo (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-08-24T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the pingtrace function. The vulnerability is caused by missing length checks when the host, count, and interval fields are concatenated into a fixed-size buffer. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device\u0027s web management interface."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-120",
"description": "Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (\u0027Classic Buffer Overflow\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-24T17:07:59.785Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.draytek.com/about/security-advisory/multiple-vulnerabilities-in-vigorswitch-series-august-2026/"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: DrayTek VigorSwitch Multiple Models Buffer Overflow via pingtrace",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/draytek-vigorswitch-multiple-models-buffer-overflow-via-pingtrace"
}
],
"title": "DrayTek VigorSwitch Multiple Models Buffer Overflow via pingtrace",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-71934",
"datePublished": "2026-08-24T17:07:59.785Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-08T16:37:44.519Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-24T19:56:23.451Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-71912 (GCVE-0-2026-71912)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-24 17:07 – Updated: 2026-08-24 19:01
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
DrayTek VigorAP Multiple Models Buffer Overflow via apautotest
Summary
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the apautotest function. The vulnerability is caused by missing length checks during memory copy operations involving the CMD6 field. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-24 18:59 UTC
CWE
- CWE-120 - Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.draytek.com/about/security-advisory/m… | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/draytek-vigo… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
6 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DrayTek Corporation | VigorAP 918R |
Affected:
0 , < 1.4.11
(custom)
|
|
| DrayTek Corporation | VigorAP 960C |
Affected:
0 , < 1.4.12
(custom)
|
|
| DrayTek Corporation | VigorAP 1060C |
Affected:
0 , < 1.4.12
(custom)
|
|
| DrayTek Corporation | VigorAP 906 |
Affected:
0 , < 1.4.13
(custom)
|
|
| DrayTek Corporation | VigorAP 912C |
Affected:
0 , < 1.4.15
(custom)
|
|
| DrayTek Corporation | VigorAP 903 |
Affected:
0 , < 1.4.22
(custom)
|
Date Public
2026-08-24 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-71912",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-24T18:59:52.374944Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-24T19:01:02.459Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorAP 918R",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.4.11",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorAP 960C",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.4.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorAP 1060C",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.4.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorAP 906",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.4.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorAP 912C",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.4.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorAP 903",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.4.22",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorap_918r_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.4.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorap_960c_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.4.12",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorap_1060c_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.4.12",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorap_906_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.4.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorap_912c_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.4.15",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorap_903_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.4.22",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jincheng Wang (@winmt)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Le Yu (Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Xiapu Luo (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-08-24T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the apautotest function. The vulnerability is caused by missing length checks during memory copy operations involving the CMD6 field. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device\u0027s web management interface."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-120",
"description": "Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (\u0027Classic Buffer Overflow\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-24T17:07:44.906Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.draytek.com/about/security-advisory/multiple-remote-code-execution-and-buffer-overflow-vulnerabilities-in-vigorap-series-august-2026/"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: DrayTek VigorAP Multiple Models Buffer Overflow via apautotest",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/draytek-vigorap-multiple-models-buffer-overflow-via-apautotest"
}
],
"title": "DrayTek VigorAP Multiple Models Buffer Overflow via apautotest",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-71912",
"datePublished": "2026-08-24T17:07:44.906Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-08T16:37:44.517Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-24T19:01:02.459Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-71911 (GCVE-0-2026-71911)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-24 17:07 – Updated: 2026-08-26 18:29
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
DrayTek VigorAP Multiple Models Buffer Overflow via setLan
Summary
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the setLan function. The vulnerability is caused by missing length checks during memory copy operations involving the lanVlanId0, lanIp, and lanNetmask fields. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-26 18:28 UTC
CWE
- CWE-120 - Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.draytek.com/about/security-advisory/m… | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/draytek-vigo… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
6 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DrayTek Corporation | VigorAP 918R |
Affected:
0 , < 1.4.11
(custom)
|
|
| DrayTek Corporation | VigorAP 960C |
Affected:
0 , < 1.4.12
(custom)
|
|
| DrayTek Corporation | VigorAP 1060C |
Affected:
0 , < 1.4.12
(custom)
|
|
| DrayTek Corporation | VigorAP 906 |
Affected:
0 , < 1.4.13
(custom)
|
|
| DrayTek Corporation | VigorAP 912C |
Affected:
0 , < 1.4.15
(custom)
|
|
| DrayTek Corporation | VigorAP 903 |
Affected:
0 , < 1.4.22
(custom)
|
Date Public
2026-08-24 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-71911",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-26T18:28:32.398763Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-26T18:29:02.710Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorAP 918R",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.4.11",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorAP 960C",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.4.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorAP 1060C",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.4.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorAP 906",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.4.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorAP 912C",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.4.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "VigorAP 903",
"vendor": "DrayTek Corporation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.4.22",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorap_918r_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.4.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorap_960c_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.4.12",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorap_1060c_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.4.12",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorap_906_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.4.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorap_912c_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.4.15",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigorap_903_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.4.22",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jincheng Wang (@winmt)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Le Yu (Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Xiapu Luo (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-08-24T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the setLan function. The vulnerability is caused by missing length checks during memory copy operations involving the lanVlanId0, lanIp, and lanNetmask fields. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device\u0027s web management interface."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-120",
"description": "Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (\u0027Classic Buffer Overflow\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-24T17:07:44.256Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.draytek.com/about/security-advisory/multiple-remote-code-execution-and-buffer-overflow-vulnerabilities-in-vigorap-series-august-2026/"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: DrayTek VigorAP Multiple Models Buffer Overflow via setLan",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/draytek-vigorap-multiple-models-buffer-overflow-via-setlan"
}
],
"title": "DrayTek VigorAP Multiple Models Buffer Overflow via setLan",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-71911",
"datePublished": "2026-08-24T17:07:44.256Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-08T16:37:44.517Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-26T18:29:02.710Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-71399 (GCVE-0-2026-71399)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-25 17:52 – Updated: 2026-08-27 22:32
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Adobe XD | Buffer Overflow (CWE-120)
Summary
Adobe XD is affected by a Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.
Severity
7.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-25 18:53 UTC
CWE
- CWE-120 - Buffer Overflow (CWE-120)
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/xd/apsb… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
Date Public
2026-08-25 17:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-71399",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-25T18:53:19.406474Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-25T18:53:55.232Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Adobe XD",
"vendor": "Adobe",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "61",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-08-25T17:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Adobe XD is affected by a Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"environmentalScore": 7.8,
"environmentalSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitCodeMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "LOW",
"modifiedAttackVector": "LOCAL",
"modifiedAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"modifiedConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"modifiedIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NONE",
"modifiedScope": "UNCHANGED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"remediationLevel": "NOT_DEFINED",
"reportConfidence": "NOT_DEFINED",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"temporalScore": 7.8,
"temporalSeverity": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-120",
"description": "Buffer Overflow (CWE-120)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-27T22:32:50.060Z",
"orgId": "078d4453-3bcd-4900-85e6-15281da43538",
"shortName": "adobe"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/xd/apsb26-125.html"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Adobe XD | Buffer Overflow (CWE-120)",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "078d4453-3bcd-4900-85e6-15281da43538",
"assignerShortName": "adobe",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-71399",
"datePublished": "2026-08-25T17:52:37.463Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-06T11:06:54.737Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-27T22:32:50.060Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-70465 (GCVE-0-2026-70465)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-12 11:52 – Updated: 2026-08-13 03:55
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
A buffer copy without checking size of input ('classic buffer overflow') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientWindows 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, FortiClientWindows 7.2.0 through 7.2.11 may allow an unauthenticated attacker in a position to alter or craft DNS responses to the targeted host to execute arbitrary code via malicious packets.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-12 00:00 UTC
CWE
- CWE-120 - Escalation of privilege
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortinet | FortiClientWindows |
Affected:
7.4.0 , ≤ 7.4.3
(semver)
Affected: 7.2.0 , ≤ 7.2.11 (semver) cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-70465",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-12T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-13T03:55:27.282Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:forticlientwindows:7.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "FortiClientWindows",
"vendor": "Fortinet",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.4.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.11",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A buffer copy without checking size of input (\u0027classic buffer overflow\u0027) vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientWindows 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, FortiClientWindows 7.2.0 through 7.2.11 may allow an unauthenticated attacker in a position to alter or craft DNS responses to the targeted host to execute arbitrary code via malicious packets."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-120",
"description": "Escalation of privilege",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-12T11:52:49.657Z",
"orgId": "6abe59d8-c742-4dff-8ce8-9b0ca1073da8",
"shortName": "fortinet"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-156",
"url": "https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-156"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade to FortiClientWindows version 7.4.4 or above\nUpgrade to FortiClientWindows version 7.2.12 or above"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6abe59d8-c742-4dff-8ce8-9b0ca1073da8",
"assignerShortName": "fortinet",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-70465",
"datePublished": "2026-08-12T11:52:25.666Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-04T15:01:40.657Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-13T03:55:27.282Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-70415 (GCVE-0-2026-70415)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-18 16:54 – Updated: 2026-08-31 06:04
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
Dell PowerStore SDNAS contains a Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input vulnerability in NFS/RPC. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to command execution and denial of service.
Severity
8.1 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-19 03:56 UTC
CWE
- CWE-120 - Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/00049782… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
12 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dell | PowerStore 500T |
Affected:
0 , < 5.0.0.2-2761110 or later
(semver)
|
|
| Dell | PowerStore 1000T |
Affected:
0 , < 5.0.0.2-2761110 or later
(semver)
|
|
| Dell | PowerStore 1200T |
Affected:
0 , < 5.0.0.2-2761110 or later
(semver)
|
|
| Dell | PowerStore 3000T |
Affected:
0 , < 5.0.0.2-2761110 or later
(semver)
|
|
| Dell | PowerStore 3200Q |
Affected:
0 , < 5.0.0.2-2761110 or later
(semver)
|
|
| Dell | PowerStore 3200T |
Affected:
0 , < 5.0.0.2-2761110 or later
(semver)
|
|
| Dell | PowerStore 5000T |
Affected:
0 , < 5.0.0.2-2761110 or later
(semver)
|
|
| Dell | PowerStore 5200Q |
Affected:
0 , < 5.0.0.2-2761110 or later
(semver)
|
|
| Dell | PowerStore 5200T |
Affected:
0 , < 5.0.0.2-2761110 or later
(semver)
|
|
| Dell | PowerStore 7000T |
Affected:
0 , < 5.0.0.2-2761110 or later
(semver)
|
|
| Dell | PowerStore 9000T |
Affected:
0 , < 5.0.0.2-2761110 or later
(semver)
|
|
| Della | PowerStore 9200T |
Affected:
0 , < 5.0.0.2-2761110 or later
(semver)
|
Date Public
2026-08-10 06:30
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-70415",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-19T03:56:07.360051Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-20T18:36:54.795Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "PowerStore 500T",
"vendor": "Dell",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.0.0.2-2761110 or later",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "PowerStore 1000T",
"vendor": "Dell",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.0.0.2-2761110 or later",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "PowerStore 1200T",
"vendor": "Dell",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.0.0.2-2761110 or later",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "PowerStore 3000T",
"vendor": "Dell",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.0.0.2-2761110 or later",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "PowerStore 3200Q",
"vendor": "Dell",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.0.0.2-2761110 or later",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "PowerStore 3200T",
"vendor": "Dell",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.0.0.2-2761110 or later",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "PowerStore 5000T",
"vendor": "Dell",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.0.0.2-2761110 or later",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "PowerStore 5200Q",
"vendor": "Dell",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.0.0.2-2761110 or later",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "PowerStore 5200T",
"vendor": "Dell",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.0.0.2-2761110 or later",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "PowerStore 7000T",
"vendor": "Dell",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.0.0.2-2761110 or later",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "PowerStore 9000T",
"vendor": "Dell",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.0.0.2-2761110 or later",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "PowerStore 9200T",
"vendor": "Della",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.0.0.2-2761110 or later",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-08-10T06:30:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Dell PowerStore SDNAS contains a Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input vulnerability in NFS/RPC. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to command execution and denial of service."
}
],
"value": "Dell PowerStore SDNAS contains a Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input vulnerability in NFS/RPC. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to command execution and denial of service."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-120",
"description": "CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (\u0027Classic Buffer Overflow\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T06:04:14.301Z",
"orgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
"shortName": "dell"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000497829/dsa-2026-330-dell-powerstore-t-security-update-for-multiple-vulnerabilities"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.4"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c550e75a-17ff-4988-97f0-544cde3820fe",
"assignerShortName": "dell",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-70415",
"datePublished": "2026-08-18T16:54:57.477Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-04T11:16:10.499Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T06:04:14.301Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-68768 (GCVE-0-2026-68768)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-22 14:12 – Updated: 2026-08-24 18:31
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
hashcat through 7.1.2 Heap Buffer Overflow in outfile_write() via Oversized Username
Summary
hashcat contains a heap-based buffer overflow (out-of-bounds write) in the outfile_write() function in src/outfile.c. When assembling output into a fixed-size buffer (HCBUFSIZ_LARGE, ~16 MB), the function sequentially appends the username, separator, hash, and plaintext via memcpy without validating that the accumulated length stays within the buffer capacity. When run with --username --show against a crafted hash file containing an oversized username that nearly fills the buffer, the total assembled output exceeds the buffer, causing a heap buffer overflow that can corrupt memory and crash the process.
Severity
6.1 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-24 18:31 UTC
CWE
- CWE-120 - Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/issues/4740 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat | product |
| https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/commit/68f56a2… | patch |
| https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/blob/v7.1.2/sr… | technical-description |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/hashcat-thro… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
Date Public
2026-07-31 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-68768",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-24T18:31:30.947115Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-24T18:31:59.841Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/issues/4740"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "hashcat",
"vendor": "hashcat",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.1.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:hashcat:hashcat:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndIncluding": "7.1.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Piotr Kowalczyk"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-07-31T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "hashcat contains a heap-based buffer overflow (out-of-bounds write) in the outfile_write() function in src/outfile.c. When assembling output into a fixed-size buffer (HCBUFSIZ_LARGE, ~16 MB), the function sequentially appends the username, separator, hash, and plaintext via memcpy without validating that the accumulated length stays within the buffer capacity. When run with --username --show against a crafted hash file containing an oversized username that nearly fills the buffer, the total assembled output exceeds the buffer, causing a heap buffer overflow that can corrupt memory and crash the process."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-120",
"description": "Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (\u0027Classic Buffer Overflow\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-22T14:12:44.241Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Issue #4740",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/issues/4740"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/commit/68f56a2d8712867a8520bf4dcf07f6145c23df89"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/blob/v7.1.2/src/outfile.c#L654-L668"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: hashcat through 7.1.2 Heap Buffer Overflow in outfile_write() via Oversized Username",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/hashcat-through-heap-buffer-overflow-in-outfile-write-via-oversized-username"
}
],
"title": "hashcat through 7.1.2 Heap Buffer Overflow in outfile_write() via Oversized Username",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-68768",
"datePublished": "2026-08-22T14:12:44.241Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-31T16:10:55.447Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-24T18:31:59.841Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-59250 (GCVE-0-2026-59250)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-27 15:25 – Updated: 2026-08-25 23:37
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Megaco flex scanner buffer overflow via oversized property parm name
Summary
Classic buffer overflow in the Erlang/OTP megaco flex scanner C driver allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to corrupt the driver's memory (and potentially achieve remote code execution or a denial-of-service crash) by sending a single text-encoded H.248/Megaco message containing an oversized property parm name.
When tokenizing a Local/Remote descriptor, mfs_load_property_groups extracts the attacker-controlled property name (bounded only by the message length) and, when no value follows, formats it into a fixed 512-byte error_msg field of the MfsErlDrvData struct using an unchecked sprintf call. Names longer than roughly 452 bytes overflow into the immediately following struct fields (text_buf, text_ptr, term_spec, term_spec_size, term_spec_index), overwriting live pointers and counters with attacker-chosen bytes. Subsequent scanner code writes and frees through the corrupted pointers, producing arbitrary write and arbitrary free primitives inside the BEAM VM process, which can be leveraged for remote code execution. On builds compiled with _FORTIFY_SOURCE the overflow is detected at runtime and terminates the process with SIGABRT, resulting in denial of service.
The overflow occurs in the flex scanner before any grammar or Megaco-level authentication processing, so exploitation requires only network reachability to the megaco transport port on a node configured with {scanner, flex}.
This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/megaco/src/flex/megaco_flex_scanner_drv.flex.src and program routines mfs_load_property_groups.
This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.15, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.4, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.4, corresponding to megaco from 3.17.1 before 4.7.2.2, from 4.8 before 4.8.3.1, and from 4.9 before 4.9.1. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to megaco before 3.17.1, is affected is unknown.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-27 18:33 UTC
CWE
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories… | vendor-advisoryrelated |
| https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-59250.html | related |
| https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-59250 | related |
| https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#o… | x_version-scheme |
| https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/8704c8f550a1… | patch |
Impacted products
3 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Erlang | OTP |
Unknown:
0 , < 17.0
(otp)
Affected: 17.0 , < 27.3.4.15 (otp) Affected: 28.0 , < 28.5.0.4 (otp) Affected: 29.0 , < 29.0.4 (otp) cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| Erlang | OTP |
Unknown:
0 , < 3.17.1
(otp)
Affected: 3.17.1 , < 4.7.2.2 (otp) Affected: 4.8 , < 4.8.3.1 (otp) Affected: 4.9 , < 4.9.1 (otp) cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| Erlang | OTP |
Affected:
84adefa331c4159d432d22840663c38f155cd4c1 , < 8704c8f550a11ed5f825e3c011ecb03565b79c4f
(git)
cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-59250",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-27T18:33:04.735708Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-27T18:33:14.927Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"megaco_flex_scanner",
"megaco_flex_scanner_drv"
],
"packageName": "otp",
"packageURL": "pkg:sid/erlang.org/otp",
"product": "OTP",
"programFiles": [
"lib/megaco/src/flex/megaco_flex_scanner_drv.flex.src"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "mfs_load_property_groups"
},
{
"name": "megaco_flex_scanner:scan/2"
}
],
"vendor": "Erlang",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "17.0",
"status": "unknown",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "otp"
},
{
"lessThan": "27.3.4.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "17.0",
"versionType": "otp"
},
{
"lessThan": "28.5.0.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "28.0",
"versionType": "otp"
},
{
"lessThan": "29.0.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "29.0",
"versionType": "otp"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"megaco_flex_scanner",
"megaco_flex_scanner_drv"
],
"packageName": "megaco",
"packageURL": "pkg:otp/megaco?repository_url=https:%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ferlang%2Fotp\u0026vcs_url=git%2Bhttps:%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ferlang%2Fotp.git",
"product": "OTP",
"programFiles": [
"src/flex/megaco_flex_scanner_drv.flex.src"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "mfs_load_property_groups"
},
{
"name": "megaco_flex_scanner:scan/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/erlang/otp",
"vendor": "Erlang",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.17.1",
"status": "unknown",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "otp"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.7.2.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.17.1",
"versionType": "otp"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.8.3.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.8",
"versionType": "otp"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.9.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.9",
"versionType": "otp"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"megaco_flex_scanner",
"megaco_flex_scanner_drv"
],
"packageName": "erlang/otp",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/erlang/otp",
"product": "OTP",
"programFiles": [
"lib/megaco/src/flex/megaco_flex_scanner_drv.flex.src"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "mfs_load_property_groups"
},
{
"name": "megaco_flex_scanner:scan/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/erlang/otp",
"vendor": "Erlang",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "8704c8f550a11ed5f825e3c011ecb03565b79c4f",
"status": "affected",
"version": "84adefa331c4159d432d22840663c38f155cd4c1",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThe megaco text codec must be configured to use the flex scanner via the encoder option \u003ccode\u003e{scanner, flex}\u003c/code\u003e (the documented high-performance configuration). Deployments using the default Erlang-based scanner are not affected.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "The megaco text codec must be configured to use the flex scanner via the encoder option `{scanner, flex}` (the documented high-performance configuration). Deployments using the default Erlang-based scanner are not affected."
}
],
"value": "The megaco text codec must be configured to use the flex scanner via the encoder option {scanner, flex} (the documented high-performance configuration). Deployments using the default Erlang-based scanner are not affected."
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "27.3.4.15",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "28.5.0.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "28.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "29.0.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "29.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Jakub Witczak"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "Micael Karlberg"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eClassic buffer overflow in the Erlang/OTP megaco flex scanner C driver allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to corrupt the driver\u0027s memory (and potentially achieve remote code execution or a denial-of-service crash) by sending a single text-encoded H.248/Megaco message containing an oversized property parm name.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen tokenizing a Local/Remote descriptor, \u003ccode\u003emfs_load_property_groups\u003c/code\u003e extracts the attacker-controlled property name (bounded only by the message length) and, when no value follows, formats it into a fixed 512-byte \u003ccode\u003eerror_msg\u003c/code\u003e field of the \u003ccode\u003eMfsErlDrvData\u003c/code\u003e struct using an unchecked \u003ccode\u003esprintf\u003c/code\u003e call. Names longer than roughly 452 bytes overflow into the immediately following struct fields (\u003ccode\u003etext_buf\u003c/code\u003e, \u003ccode\u003etext_ptr\u003c/code\u003e, \u003ccode\u003eterm_spec\u003c/code\u003e, \u003ccode\u003eterm_spec_size\u003c/code\u003e, \u003ccode\u003eterm_spec_index\u003c/code\u003e), overwriting live pointers and counters with attacker-chosen bytes. Subsequent scanner code writes and frees through the corrupted pointers, producing arbitrary write and arbitrary free primitives inside the BEAM VM process, which can be leveraged for remote code execution. On builds compiled with \u003ccode\u003e_FORTIFY_SOURCE\u003c/code\u003e the overflow is detected at runtime and terminates the process with \u003ccode\u003eSIGABRT\u003c/code\u003e, resulting in denial of service.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe overflow occurs in the flex scanner before any grammar or Megaco-level authentication processing, so exploitation requires only network reachability to the megaco transport port on a node configured with \u003ccode\u003e{scanner, flex}\u003c/code\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis vulnerability is associated with program files \u003ccode\u003elib/megaco/src/flex/megaco_flex_scanner_drv.flex.src\u003c/code\u003e and program routines \u003ccode\u003emfs_load_property_groups\u003c/code\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects OTP from OTP\u0026nbsp;17.0 before OTP\u0026nbsp;27.3.4.15, from OTP\u0026nbsp;28.0 before OTP\u0026nbsp;28.5.0.4, and from OTP\u0026nbsp;29.0 before OTP\u0026nbsp;29.0.4, corresponding to megaco from 3.17.1 before 4.7.2.2, from 4.8 before 4.8.3.1, and from 4.9 before 4.9.1. Whether OTP before OTP\u0026nbsp;17.0, corresponding to megaco before 3.17.1, is affected is unknown.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "Classic buffer overflow in the Erlang/OTP megaco flex scanner C driver allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to corrupt the driver\u0027s memory (and potentially achieve remote code execution or a denial-of-service crash) by sending a single text-encoded H.248/Megaco message containing an oversized property parm name.\n\nWhen tokenizing a Local/Remote descriptor, `mfs_load_property_groups` extracts the attacker-controlled property name (bounded only by the message length) and, when no value follows, formats it into a fixed 512-byte `error_msg` field of the `MfsErlDrvData` struct using an unchecked `sprintf` call. Names longer than roughly 452 bytes overflow into the immediately following struct fields (`text_buf`, `text_ptr`, `term_spec`, `term_spec_size`, `term_spec_index`), overwriting live pointers and counters with attacker-chosen bytes. Subsequent scanner code writes and frees through the corrupted pointers, producing arbitrary write and arbitrary free primitives inside the BEAM VM process, which can be leveraged for remote code execution. On builds compiled with `_FORTIFY_SOURCE` the overflow is detected at runtime and terminates the process with `SIGABRT`, resulting in denial of service.\n\nThe overflow occurs in the flex scanner before any grammar or Megaco-level authentication processing, so exploitation requires only network reachability to the megaco transport port on a node configured with `{scanner, flex}`.\n\nThis vulnerability is associated with program files `lib/megaco/src/flex/megaco_flex_scanner_drv.flex.src` and program routines `mfs_load_property_groups`.\n\nThis issue affects OTP from OTP\u00a017.0 before OTP\u00a027.3.4.15, from OTP\u00a028.0 before OTP\u00a028.5.0.4, and from OTP\u00a029.0 before OTP\u00a029.0.4, corresponding to megaco from 3.17.1 before 4.7.2.2, from 4.8 before 4.8.3.1, and from 4.9 before 4.9.1. Whether OTP before OTP\u00a017.0, corresponding to megaco before 3.17.1, is affected is unknown."
}
],
"value": "Classic buffer overflow in the Erlang/OTP megaco flex scanner C driver allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to corrupt the driver\u0027s memory (and potentially achieve remote code execution or a denial-of-service crash) by sending a single text-encoded H.248/Megaco message containing an oversized property parm name.\n\nWhen tokenizing a Local/Remote descriptor, mfs_load_property_groups extracts the attacker-controlled property name (bounded only by the message length) and, when no value follows, formats it into a fixed 512-byte error_msg field of the MfsErlDrvData struct using an unchecked sprintf call. Names longer than roughly 452 bytes overflow into the immediately following struct fields (text_buf, text_ptr, term_spec, term_spec_size, term_spec_index), overwriting live pointers and counters with attacker-chosen bytes. Subsequent scanner code writes and frees through the corrupted pointers, producing arbitrary write and arbitrary free primitives inside the BEAM VM process, which can be leveraged for remote code execution. On builds compiled with _FORTIFY_SOURCE the overflow is detected at runtime and terminates the process with SIGABRT, resulting in denial of service.\n\nThe overflow occurs in the flex scanner before any grammar or Megaco-level authentication processing, so exploitation requires only network reachability to the megaco transport port on a node configured with {scanner, flex}.\n\nThis vulnerability is associated with program files lib/megaco/src/flex/megaco_flex_scanner_drv.flex.src and program routines mfs_load_property_groups.\n\nThis issue affects OTP from OTP\u00a017.0 before OTP\u00a027.3.4.15, from OTP\u00a028.0 before OTP\u00a028.5.0.4, and from OTP\u00a029.0 before OTP\u00a029.0.4, corresponding to megaco from 3.17.1 before 4.7.2.2, from 4.8 before 4.8.3.1, and from 4.9 before 4.9.1. Whether OTP before OTP\u00a017.0, corresponding to megaco before 3.17.1, is affected is unknown."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-100",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-100 Overflow Buffers"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-120",
"description": "CWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (\u0027Classic Buffer Overflow\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-787",
"description": "CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-25T23:37:43.717Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-7xgh-gmgf-q2g7"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-59250.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-59250"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_version-scheme"
],
"url": "https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versions"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/8704c8f550a11ed5f825e3c011ecb03565b79c4f"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Megaco flex scanner buffer overflow via oversized property parm name",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eSwitch the megaco text codec to the default Erlang-based scanner by removing \u003ccode\u003e{scanner, flex}\u003c/code\u003e from the encoder configuration. The Erlang scanner is not affected by this C-level memory corruption, at the cost of reduced parsing throughput.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "Switch the megaco text codec to the default Erlang-based scanner by removing `{scanner, flex}` from the encoder configuration. The Erlang scanner is not affected by this C-level memory corruption, at the cost of reduced parsing throughput."
}
],
"value": "Switch the megaco text codec to the default Erlang-based scanner by removing {scanner, flex} from the encoder configuration. The Erlang scanner is not affected by this C-level memory corruption, at the cost of reduced parsing throughput."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-59250",
"datePublished": "2026-07-27T15:25:03.106Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-04T04:24:03.653Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-25T23:37:43.717Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-58553 (GCVE-0-2026-58553)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-15 12:16 – Updated: 2026-07-15 13:09
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
Out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the image codec module. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality.
Severity
4 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-15 13:08 UTC
CWE
- CWE-120 - Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
Assigner
References
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-58553",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-15T13:08:51.817946Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-15T13:09:03.769Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "HarmonyOS",
"vendor": "Huawei",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.1.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the image codec module.\u0026nbsp;Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality."
}
],
"value": "Out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the image codec module.\u00a0Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-120",
"description": "CWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (\u0027Classic Buffer Overflow\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-15T12:16:27.819Z",
"orgId": "25ac1063-e409-4190-8079-24548c77ea2e",
"shortName": "huawei"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletin/2026/7/"
},
{
"url": "https://consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletinvision/2026/7/"
},
{
"url": "https://consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletinwearables/2026/7/"
},
{
"url": "https://consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletinlaptops/2026/7/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "25ac1063-e409-4190-8079-24548c77ea2e",
"assignerShortName": "huawei",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-58553",
"datePublished": "2026-07-15T12:16:27.819Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-01T10:03:11.403Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-15T13:09:03.769Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-58552 (GCVE-0-2026-58552)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-15 12:13 – Updated: 2026-07-15 13:14
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
Out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the image codec module. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality.
Severity
5.1 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-15 13:14 UTC
CWE
- CWE-120 - Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
Assigner
References
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-58552",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-15T13:14:07.813312Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-15T13:14:22.767Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "HarmonyOS",
"vendor": "Huawei",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.1.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the image codec module.\u0026nbsp;Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality."
}
],
"value": "Out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the image codec module.\u00a0Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-120",
"description": "CWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (\u0027Classic Buffer Overflow\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-15T12:13:08.618Z",
"orgId": "25ac1063-e409-4190-8079-24548c77ea2e",
"shortName": "huawei"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletin/2026/7/"
},
{
"url": "https://consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletinvision/2026/7/"
},
{
"url": "https://consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletinwearables/2026/7/"
},
{
"url": "https://consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletinlaptops/2026/7/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "25ac1063-e409-4190-8079-24548c77ea2e",
"assignerShortName": "huawei",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-58552",
"datePublished": "2026-07-15T12:13:08.618Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-01T10:03:11.403Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-15T13:14:22.767Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation MIT-3
Requirements
Strategy: Language Selection
- Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer.
- Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
Mitigation MIT-4.1
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Mitigation MIT-10
Operation
Build and Compilation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.
- D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
Mitigation MIT-9
Implementation
- Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory:
- Double check that your buffer is as large as you specify.
- When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string.
- Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a loop and make sure there is no danger of writing past the allocated space.
- If necessary, truncate all input strings to a reasonable length before passing them to the copy and concatenation functions.
Mitigation MIT-5
Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Mitigation MIT-15
Architecture and Design
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation MIT-11
Operation
Build and Compilation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
- Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as "rebasing" (for Windows) and "prelinking" (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
- For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].
Mitigation MIT-12
Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment.
- For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].
Mitigation
Build and Compilation
Operation
Most mitigating technologies at the compiler or OS level to date address only a subset of buffer overflow problems and rarely provide complete protection against even that subset. It is good practice to implement strategies to increase the workload of an attacker, such as leaving the attacker to guess an unknown value that changes every program execution.
Mitigation MIT-13
Implementation
Replace unbounded copy functions with analogous functions that support length arguments, such as strcpy with strncpy. Create these if they are not available.
Mitigation MIT-21
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
Mitigation MIT-17
Architecture and Design
Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation MIT-22
Architecture and Design
Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
CAPEC-10: Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables
This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the adversary finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
CAPEC-100: Overflow Buffers
Buffer Overflow attacks target improper or missing bounds checking on buffer operations, typically triggered by input injected by an adversary. As a consequence, an adversary is able to write past the boundaries of allocated buffer regions in memory, causing a program crash or potentially redirection of execution as per the adversaries' choice.
CAPEC-14: Client-side Injection-induced Buffer Overflow
This type of attack exploits a buffer overflow vulnerability in targeted client software through injection of malicious content from a custom-built hostile service. This hostile service is created to deliver the correct content to the client software. For example, if the client-side application is a browser, the service will host a webpage that the browser loads.
CAPEC-24: Filter Failure through Buffer Overflow
In this attack, the idea is to cause an active filter to fail by causing an oversized transaction. An attacker may try to feed overly long input strings to the program in an attempt to overwhelm the filter (by causing a buffer overflow) and hoping that the filter does not fail securely (i.e. the user input is let into the system unfiltered).
CAPEC-42: MIME Conversion
An attacker exploits a weakness in the MIME conversion routine to cause a buffer overflow and gain control over the mail server machine. The MIME system is designed to allow various different information formats to be interpreted and sent via e-mail. Attack points exist when data are converted to MIME compatible format and back.
CAPEC-44: Overflow Binary Resource File
An attack of this type exploits a buffer overflow vulnerability in the handling of binary resources. Binary resources may include music files like MP3, image files like JPEG files, and any other binary file. These attacks may pass unnoticed to the client machine through normal usage of files, such as a browser loading a seemingly innocent JPEG file. This can allow the adversary access to the execution stack and execute arbitrary code in the target process.
CAPEC-45: Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links
This type of attack leverages the use of symbolic links to cause buffer overflows. An adversary can try to create or manipulate a symbolic link file such that its contents result in out of bounds data. When the target software processes the symbolic link file, it could potentially overflow internal buffers with insufficient bounds checking.
CAPEC-46: Overflow Variables and Tags
This type of attack leverages the use of tags or variables from a formatted configuration data to cause buffer overflow. The adversary crafts a malicious HTML page or configuration file that includes oversized strings, thus causing an overflow.
CAPEC-47: Buffer Overflow via Parameter Expansion
In this attack, the target software is given input that the adversary knows will be modified and expanded in size during processing. This attack relies on the target software failing to anticipate that the expanded data may exceed some internal limit, thereby creating a buffer overflow.
CAPEC-67: String Format Overflow in syslog()
This attack targets applications and software that uses the syslog() function insecurely. If an application does not explicitely use a format string parameter in a call to syslog(), user input can be placed in the format string parameter leading to a format string injection attack. Adversaries can then inject malicious format string commands into the function call leading to a buffer overflow. There are many reported software vulnerabilities with the root cause being a misuse of the syslog() function.
CAPEC-8: Buffer Overflow in an API Call
This attack targets libraries or shared code modules which are vulnerable to buffer overflow attacks. An adversary who has knowledge of known vulnerable libraries or shared code can easily target software that makes use of these libraries. All clients that make use of the code library thus become vulnerable by association. This has a very broad effect on security across a system, usually affecting more than one software process.
CAPEC-9: Buffer Overflow in Local Command-Line Utilities
This attack targets command-line utilities available in a number of shells. An adversary can leverage a vulnerability found in a command-line utility to escalate privilege to root.
CAPEC-92: Forced Integer Overflow
This attack forces an integer variable to go out of range. The integer variable is often used as an offset such as size of memory allocation or similarly. The attacker would typically control the value of such variable and try to get it out of range. For instance the integer in question is incremented past the maximum possible value, it may wrap to become a very small, or negative number, therefore providing a very incorrect value which can lead to unexpected behavior. At worst the attacker can execute arbitrary code.