CWE-119
DiscouragedImproper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
Abstraction: Class · Status: Stable
The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.
17547 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-G7FQ-VJJH-PWC3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 17:41 – Updated: 2022-05-01 17:41Integer overflow in the ISC dhcpd 3.0.x before 3.0.7 and 3.1.x before 3.1.1; and the DHCP server in EMC VMware Workstation before 5.5.5 Build 56455 and 6.x before 6.0.1 Build 55017, Player before 1.0.5 Build 56455 and Player 2 before 2.0.1 Build 55017, ACE before 1.0.3 Build 54075 and ACE 2 before 2.0.1 Build 55017, and Server before 1.0.4 Build 56528; allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or execute arbitrary code via a malformed DHCP packet with a large dhcp-max-message-size that triggers a stack-based buffer overflow, related to servers configured to send many DHCP options to clients.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-0062"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-09-21T19:17:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Integer overflow in the ISC dhcpd 3.0.x before 3.0.7 and 3.1.x before 3.1.1; and the DHCP server in EMC VMware Workstation before 5.5.5 Build 56455 and 6.x before 6.0.1 Build 55017, Player before 1.0.5 Build 56455 and Player 2 before 2.0.1 Build 55017, ACE before 1.0.3 Build 54075 and ACE 2 before 2.0.1 Build 55017, and Server before 1.0.4 Build 56528; allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or execute arbitrary code via a malformed DHCP packet with a large dhcp-max-message-size that triggers a stack-based buffer overflow, related to servers configured to send many DHCP options to clients.",
"id": "GHSA-g7fq-vjjh-pwc3",
"modified": "2022-05-01T17:41:29Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T17:41:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-0062"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339561"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/33102"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227135"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-September/065902.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-03/msg00000.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/26890"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/27694"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/27706"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/31396"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34263"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200711-23.xml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200808-05.xml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://wiki.rpath.com/Advisories:rPSA-2009-0041"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.iss.net/threats/275.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:153"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/501759/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25729"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018717"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-543-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vmware.com/support/ace/doc/releasenotes_ace.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vmware.com/support/ace2/doc/releasenotes_ace2.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vmware.com/support/player/doc/releasenotes_player.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vmware.com/support/player2/doc/releasenotes_player2.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vmware.com/support/server/doc/releasenotes_server.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vmware.com/support/ws55/doc/releasenotes_ws55.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vmware.com/support/ws6/doc/releasenotes_ws6.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3229"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-G7G8-MX45-X4C8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:09 – Updated: 2024-09-04 20:54An issue was discovered in aubio 0.4.6. A SEGV signal can occur in aubio_pitch_set_unit in pitch/pitch.c, as demonstrated by aubionotes.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "aubio"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.4.7"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-14522"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-08-04T21:52:27Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2018-07-23T08:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in aubio 0.4.6. A SEGV signal can occur in `aubio_pitch_set_unit` in `pitch/pitch.c`, as demonstrated by aubionotes.",
"id": "GHSA-g7g8-mx45-x4c8",
"modified": "2024-09-04T20:54:06Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T01:09:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-14522"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/aubio/aubio/issues/188"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/aubio/aubio/commit/99c7aa2e3efec988a5f81018b48d9388ff24bba1"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/aubio/aubio"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/aubio/PYSEC-2018-62.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00031.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00071.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Aubio is vulnerable to denial of service via aubio_pitch_set_unit function"
}
GHSA-G7J2-XVH7-CM24
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-01 09:32 – Updated: 2025-05-01 09:32A vulnerability was found in PCMan FTP Server up to 2.0.7. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the component PROMPT Command Handler. The manipulation leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-4158"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-01T09:15:15Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was found in PCMan FTP Server up to 2.0.7. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the component PROMPT Command Handler. The manipulation leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.",
"id": "GHSA-g7j2-xvh7-cm24",
"modified": "2025-05-01T09:32:28Z",
"published": "2025-05-01T09:32:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-4158"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://fitoxs.com/exploit/exploit-e4d909c290d0fb1ca068ffaddf22cbd0.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.306690"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.306690"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.561028"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-G7J5-4HM3-97G5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:54 – Updated: 2022-05-14 03:54Heap buffer overflow during image processing in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 56.0.2924.76 for Linux, Windows and Mac, and 56.0.2924.87 for Android, allowed a remote attacker to perform an out of bounds memory read via a crafted HTML page.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-5014"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-02-17T07:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Heap buffer overflow during image processing in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 56.0.2924.76 for Linux, Windows and Mac, and 56.0.2924.87 for Android, allowed a remote attacker to perform an out of bounds memory read via a crafted HTML page.",
"id": "GHSA-g7j5-4hm3-97g5",
"modified": "2022-05-14T03:54:27Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:54:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-5014"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2017/01/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://crbug.com/675332"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-66"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0206.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3776"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95792"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037718"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G7JG-VXF2-648C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-12 09:30 – Updated: 2025-07-12 09:30A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Tenda FH1201 1.2.0.14. Affected by this vulnerability is the function fromRouteStatic of the file /goform/fromRouteStatic of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument page leads to buffer overflow. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-7465"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-12T07:15:23Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Tenda FH1201 1.2.0.14. Affected by this vulnerability is the function fromRouteStatic of the file /goform/fromRouteStatic of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument page leads to buffer overflow. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.",
"id": "GHSA-g7jg-vxf2-648c",
"modified": "2025-07-12T09:30:30Z",
"published": "2025-07-12T09:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-7465"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://candle-throne-f75.notion.site/Tenda-FH1201-fromRouteStatic-229df0aa118580ba952bd3f16857b176"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.316117"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.316117"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.610389"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.tenda.com.cn"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-G7MG-6RH4-C572
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-02-09 00:00 – Updated: 2022-03-17 00:05Expired Pointer Dereference in NPM radare2.js prior to 5.6.2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-0523"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119",
"CWE-825"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-02-08T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Expired Pointer Dereference in NPM radare2.js prior to 5.6.2.",
"id": "GHSA-g7mg-6rh4-c572",
"modified": "2022-03-17T00:05:51Z",
"published": "2022-02-09T00:00:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0523"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/commit/35482cb760db10f87a62569e2f8872dbd95e9269"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://huntr.dev/bounties/9d8d6ae0-fe00-40b9-ae1e-b0e8103bac69"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BZTIMAS53YT66FUS4QHQAFRJOBMUFG6D"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/E6YBRQ3UCFWJVSOYIKPVUDASZ544TFND"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G7P5-5759-QV46
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2020-09-25 18:28 – Updated: 2024-10-30 21:11Impact
The data_splits argument of tf.raw_ops.StringNGrams lacks validation. This allows a user to pass values that can cause heap overflow errors and even leak contents of memory
>>> tf.raw_ops.StringNGrams(data=["aa", "bb", "cc", "dd", "ee", "ff"], data_splits=[0,8], separator=" ", ngram_widths=[3], left_pad="", right_pad="", pad_width=0, preserve_short_sequences=False)
StringNGrams(ngrams=<tf.Tensor: shape=(6,), dtype=string, numpy=
array([b'aa bb cc', b'bb cc dd', b'cc dd ee', b'dd ee ff',
b'ee ff \xf4j\xa7q\x7f\x00\x00q\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\xd8\x9b~\xa8q\x7f\x00',
b'ff \xf4j\xa7q\x7f\x00\x00q\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\xd8\x9b~\xa8q\x7f\x00 \x9b~\xa8q\x7f\x00\x00p\xf5j\xa7q\x7f\x00\x00H\xf8j\xa7q\x7f\x00\x00\xf0\xf3\xf7\x85q\x7f\x00\x00`}\xa6\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00`~\xa6\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\xb0~\xeb\x9bq\x7f\x00'],...
All the binary strings after ee ff are contents from the memory stack. Since these can contain return addresses, this data leak can be used to defeat ASLR.
Patches
We have patched the issue in 0462de5b544ed4731aa2fb23946ac22c01856b80 and will release patch releases for all versions between 1.15 and 2.3.
We recommend users to upgrade to TensorFlow 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1, or 2.3.1.
For more information
Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.
Attribution
This vulnerability has been reported by members of the Aivul Team from Qihoo 360.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "tensorflow"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "tensorflow"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.0.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "tensorflow"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.1.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.1.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "tensorflow"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.2.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.2.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"2.2.0"
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "tensorflow"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.3.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.3.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"2.3.0"
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "tensorflow-cpu"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "tensorflow-cpu"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.0.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "tensorflow-cpu"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.1.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.1.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "tensorflow-cpu"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.2.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.2.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"2.2.0"
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "tensorflow-cpu"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.3.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.3.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"2.3.0"
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "tensorflow-gpu"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "tensorflow-gpu"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.0.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "tensorflow-gpu"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.1.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.1.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "tensorflow-gpu"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.2.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.2.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"2.2.0"
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "tensorflow-gpu"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.3.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.3.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"2.3.0"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-15205"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119",
"CWE-122",
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2020-09-25T17:37:04Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2020-09-25T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\nThe `data_splits` argument of [`tf.raw_ops.StringNGrams`](https://www.tensorflow.org/api_docs/python/tf/raw_ops/StringNGrams) lacks validation. This allows a user to pass values that can cause heap overflow errors and even leak contents of memory\n```python\n\u003e\u003e\u003e tf.raw_ops.StringNGrams(data=[\"aa\", \"bb\", \"cc\", \"dd\", \"ee\", \"ff\"], data_splits=[0,8], separator=\" \", ngram_widths=[3], left_pad=\"\", right_pad=\"\", pad_width=0, preserve_short_sequences=False)\nStringNGrams(ngrams=\u003ctf.Tensor: shape=(6,), dtype=string, numpy=\narray([b\u0027aa bb cc\u0027, b\u0027bb cc dd\u0027, b\u0027cc dd ee\u0027, b\u0027dd ee ff\u0027,\n b\u0027ee ff \\xf4j\\xa7q\\x7f\\x00\\x00q\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\xd8\\x9b~\\xa8q\\x7f\\x00\u0027,\n b\u0027ff \\xf4j\\xa7q\\x7f\\x00\\x00q\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\xd8\\x9b~\\xa8q\\x7f\\x00 \\x9b~\\xa8q\\x7f\\x00\\x00p\\xf5j\\xa7q\\x7f\\x00\\x00H\\xf8j\\xa7q\\x7f\\x00\\x00\\xf0\\xf3\\xf7\\x85q\\x7f\\x00\\x00`}\\xa6\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00`~\\xa6\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\x00\\xb0~\\xeb\\x9bq\\x7f\\x00\u0027],...\n```\n\nAll the binary strings after `ee ff` are contents from the memory stack. Since these can contain return addresses, this data leak can be used to defeat ASLR.\n\n### Patches\nWe have patched the issue in 0462de5b544ed4731aa2fb23946ac22c01856b80 and will release patch releases for all versions between 1.15 and 2.3.\n\nWe recommend users to upgrade to TensorFlow 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1, or 2.3.1.\n\n### For more information\nPlease consult [our security guide](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/SECURITY.md) for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.\n\n### Attribution\nThis vulnerability has been reported by members of the Aivul Team from Qihoo 360.",
"id": "GHSA-g7p5-5759-qv46",
"modified": "2024-10-30T21:11:46Z",
"published": "2020-09-25T18:28:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-g7p5-5759-qv46"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15205"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/0462de5b544ed4731aa2fb23946ac22c01856b80"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/tensorflow-cpu/PYSEC-2020-285.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/tensorflow-gpu/PYSEC-2020-320.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/tensorflow/PYSEC-2020-128.yaml"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/releases/tag/v2.3.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00065.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Data leak in Tensorflow"
}
GHSA-G7PJ-4WJV-5PV3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:23 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:23The dvb_ca_ioctl function in drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/av7110_ca.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.38-rc2 does not check the sign of a certain integer field, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a negative value.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-0521"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2011-02-02T23:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The dvb_ca_ioctl function in drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/av7110_ca.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.38-rc2 does not check the sign of a certain integer field, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a negative value.",
"id": "GHSA-g7pj-4wjv-5pv3",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:23:51Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:23:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-0521"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/64988"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=cb26a24ee9706473f31d34cc259f4dcf45cd0644"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=cb26a24ee9706473f31d34cc259f4dcf45cd0644"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/24/2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/25/2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/43009"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/46397"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/ChangeLog-2.6.38-rc2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/520102/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45986"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025195"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2011-0012.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-G7Q5-P4RQ-XJVR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:40 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:40A remote code execution vulnerability in the Android media framework (libavc). Product: Android. Versions: 6.0, 6.0.1, 7.0, 7.1.1, 7.1.2, 8.0. Android ID: A-38448381.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-0761"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-09-08T20:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A remote code execution vulnerability in the Android media framework (libavc). Product: Android. Versions: 6.0, 6.0.1, 7.0, 7.1.1, 7.1.2, 8.0. Android ID: A-38448381.",
"id": "GHSA-g7q5-p4rq-xjvr",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:40:37Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:40:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-0761"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2017-09-01"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100649"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-G7QC-77MR-F9FJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:10 – Updated: 2025-04-03 04:23Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Autonomy (formerly Verity) KeyView SDK before 9.2.0, as used in Lotus Notes 6.5.4 and 7.0, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a UUE file containing an encoded file with a long filename handled by uudrdr.dll, (2) a compressed ZIP file with a long filename handled by kvarcve.dll, (3) a TAR archive with a long filename that is extracted to a directory with a long path handled by the TAR reader (tarrdr.dll), (4) an email that contains a long HTTP, FTP, or // link handled by the HTML speed reader (htmsr.dll) or (5) an email containing a crafted long link handled by the HTML speed reader (htmsr.dll).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-2618"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-12-31T05:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Autonomy (formerly Verity) KeyView SDK before 9.2.0, as used in Lotus Notes 6.5.4 and 7.0, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a UUE file containing an encoded file with a long filename handled by uudrdr.dll, (2) a compressed ZIP file with a long filename handled by kvarcve.dll, (3) a TAR archive with a long filename that is extracted to a directory with a long path handled by the TAR reader (tarrdr.dll), (4) an email that contains a long HTTP, FTP, or // link handled by the HTML speed reader (htmsr.dll) or (5) an email containing a crafted long link handled by the HTML speed reader (htmsr.dll).",
"id": "GHSA-g7qc-77mr-f9fj",
"modified": "2025-04-03T04:23:16Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:10:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-2618"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24635"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24636"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24638"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24639"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/16100"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/16280"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2005-32/advisory"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2005-34/advisory"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2005-36/advisory"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2005-37/advisory"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2005-66/advisory"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1015657"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=475\u0026uid=swg21229918"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/884076"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/23064"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/23065"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/23066"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/23067"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/23068"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424626/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424666/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424689/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424692/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16576"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0500"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0501"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Mitigation MIT-3
Strategy: Language Selection
- Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer.
- Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
Mitigation MIT-4.1
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Mitigation MIT-10
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking.
- D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
Mitigation MIT-9
- Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory:
- Double check that the buffer is as large as specified.
- When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string.
- Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a loop and make sure there is no danger of writing past the allocated space.
- If necessary, truncate all input strings to a reasonable length before passing them to the copy and concatenation functions.
Mitigation MIT-11
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
- Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as "rebasing" (for Windows) and "prelinking" (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking.
- For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].
Mitigation MIT-12
Strategy: Environment Hardening
- Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment.
- For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].
Mitigation MIT-13
Replace unbounded copy functions with analogous functions that support length arguments, such as strcpy with strncpy. Create these if they are not available.
CAPEC-10: Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables
This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the adversary finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
CAPEC-100: Overflow Buffers
Buffer Overflow attacks target improper or missing bounds checking on buffer operations, typically triggered by input injected by an adversary. As a consequence, an adversary is able to write past the boundaries of allocated buffer regions in memory, causing a program crash or potentially redirection of execution as per the adversaries' choice.
CAPEC-123: Buffer Manipulation
An adversary manipulates an application's interaction with a buffer in an attempt to read or modify data they shouldn't have access to. Buffer attacks are distinguished in that it is the buffer space itself that is the target of the attack rather than any code responsible for interpreting the content of the buffer. In virtually all buffer attacks the content that is placed in the buffer is immaterial. Instead, most buffer attacks involve retrieving or providing more input than can be stored in the allocated buffer, resulting in the reading or overwriting of other unintended program memory.
CAPEC-14: Client-side Injection-induced Buffer Overflow
This type of attack exploits a buffer overflow vulnerability in targeted client software through injection of malicious content from a custom-built hostile service. This hostile service is created to deliver the correct content to the client software. For example, if the client-side application is a browser, the service will host a webpage that the browser loads.
CAPEC-24: Filter Failure through Buffer Overflow
In this attack, the idea is to cause an active filter to fail by causing an oversized transaction. An attacker may try to feed overly long input strings to the program in an attempt to overwhelm the filter (by causing a buffer overflow) and hoping that the filter does not fail securely (i.e. the user input is let into the system unfiltered).
CAPEC-42: MIME Conversion
An attacker exploits a weakness in the MIME conversion routine to cause a buffer overflow and gain control over the mail server machine. The MIME system is designed to allow various different information formats to be interpreted and sent via e-mail. Attack points exist when data are converted to MIME compatible format and back.
CAPEC-44: Overflow Binary Resource File
An attack of this type exploits a buffer overflow vulnerability in the handling of binary resources. Binary resources may include music files like MP3, image files like JPEG files, and any other binary file. These attacks may pass unnoticed to the client machine through normal usage of files, such as a browser loading a seemingly innocent JPEG file. This can allow the adversary access to the execution stack and execute arbitrary code in the target process.
CAPEC-45: Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links
This type of attack leverages the use of symbolic links to cause buffer overflows. An adversary can try to create or manipulate a symbolic link file such that its contents result in out of bounds data. When the target software processes the symbolic link file, it could potentially overflow internal buffers with insufficient bounds checking.
CAPEC-46: Overflow Variables and Tags
This type of attack leverages the use of tags or variables from a formatted configuration data to cause buffer overflow. The adversary crafts a malicious HTML page or configuration file that includes oversized strings, thus causing an overflow.
CAPEC-47: Buffer Overflow via Parameter Expansion
In this attack, the target software is given input that the adversary knows will be modified and expanded in size during processing. This attack relies on the target software failing to anticipate that the expanded data may exceed some internal limit, thereby creating a buffer overflow.
CAPEC-8: Buffer Overflow in an API Call
This attack targets libraries or shared code modules which are vulnerable to buffer overflow attacks. An adversary who has knowledge of known vulnerable libraries or shared code can easily target software that makes use of these libraries. All clients that make use of the code library thus become vulnerable by association. This has a very broad effect on security across a system, usually affecting more than one software process.
CAPEC-9: Buffer Overflow in Local Command-Line Utilities
This attack targets command-line utilities available in a number of shells. An adversary can leverage a vulnerability found in a command-line utility to escalate privilege to root.