VAR-201601-0396
Vulnerability from variot - Updated: 2025-04-13 23:26F5 BIG-IP APM 11.4.1 before 11.4.1 HF9, 11.5.x before 11.5.3, and 11.6.0 before 11.6.0 HF4 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors related to processing a Citrix Remote Desktop connection through a virtual server configured with a remote desktop profile, aka an "Out-of-bounds memory vulnerability.". F5 BIG-IP APM There is a service disruption (DoS) Vulnerabilities exist that could be put into a state or execute arbitrary code. F5 BIG-IP APM is prone to a memory-corruption vulnerability. An attacker can exploit this issue to execute arbitrary code within the context of the affected application. Failed exploit attempts may result in a denial-of-service condition. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is a set of access and security solutions from F5 Corporation of the United States. The solution provides unified access to business-critical applications and networks. The following versions are affected: F5 BIG-IP APM 11.4.1 prior to HF9, 11.4.1 prior to 11.5.3, 11.6.0 prior to 11.6.0 HF4
Show details on source website{
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/VARIoTentry#",
"affected_products": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/affected_products"
},
"configurations": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/configurations"
},
"credits": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/credits"
},
"cvss": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/cvss/"
},
"description": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/description/"
},
"exploit_availability": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/exploit_availability/"
},
"external_ids": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/external_ids/"
},
"iot": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/iot/"
},
"iot_taxonomy": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/iot_taxonomy/"
},
"patch": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/patch/"
},
"problemtype_data": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/problemtype_data/"
},
"references": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/references/"
},
"sources": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources/"
},
"sources_release_date": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources_release_date/"
},
"sources_update_date": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources_update_date/"
},
"threat_type": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/threat_type/"
},
"title": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/title/"
},
"type": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/type/"
}
},
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/vuln/VAR-201601-0396",
"affected_products": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/affected_products#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
},
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources"
}
},
"data": [
{
"model": "big-ip access policy manager",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 1.6,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.5.0"
},
{
"model": "big-ip access policy manager",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 1.6,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.3.0"
},
{
"model": "big-ip access policy manager",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 1.6,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.6.0"
},
{
"model": "big-ip access policy manager",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 1.6,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.4.0"
},
{
"model": "big-ip access policy manager",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 1.6,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.2.0"
},
{
"model": "big-ip access policy manager",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 1.6,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.5.1"
},
{
"model": "big-ip access policy manager",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 1.6,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.2.1"
},
{
"model": "big-ip access policy manager",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 0.8,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.4.1 to 11.4.1 hf8"
},
{
"model": "big-ip access policy manager",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 0.8,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.5.0 to 11.5.2 hf1"
},
{
"model": "big-ip access policy manager",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 0.8,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.6.0 to 11.6.0 hf3"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm hf3",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.6"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm hf1",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.5.2"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm hf8",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.4.1"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.6.0"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.5.0"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.4.1"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm",
"scope": "ne",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "12.0"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm hf6",
"scope": "ne",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.6"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm hf5",
"scope": "ne",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.6"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm hf4",
"scope": "ne",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.6"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm",
"scope": "ne",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.5.3"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm hf9",
"scope": "ne",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.4.1"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm",
"scope": "ne",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.2"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm",
"scope": "ne",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.0"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm",
"scope": "ne",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "10.2.4"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm",
"scope": "ne",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "10.2.3"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm",
"scope": "ne",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "10.2.2"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm",
"scope": "ne",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "10.2"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm",
"scope": "ne",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.4.0"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm",
"scope": "ne",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.3.0"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm hf5",
"scope": "ne",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.2.1"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm",
"scope": "ne",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "11.1.0"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm",
"scope": "ne",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "10.2.1"
},
{
"model": "big-ip apm",
"scope": "ne",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "f5",
"version": "10.1"
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "80022"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2015-006772"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201601-184"
},
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2015-8098"
}
]
},
"configurations": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/configurations#",
"children": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"cpe_match": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"nodes": {
"@container": "@list"
}
},
"data": [
{
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe22Uri": "cpe:/a:f5:big-ip_access_policy_manager",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2015-006772"
}
]
},
"credits": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/credits#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": "The vendor reported this issue.",
"sources": [
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "80022"
}
],
"trust": 0.3
},
"cve": "CVE-2015-8098",
"cvss": {
"@context": {
"cvssV2": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/cvss/cvssV2#"
},
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/cvss/cvssV2"
},
"cvssV3": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/cvss/cvssV3#"
},
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/cvss/cvssV3/"
},
"severity": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/cvss/severity#"
},
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/cvss/severity"
},
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
},
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources"
}
},
"data": [
{
"cvssV2": [
{
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"author": "nvd@nist.gov",
"availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"baseScore": 10.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"id": "CVE-2015-8098",
"impactScore": 10.0,
"integrityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"severity": "HIGH",
"trust": 1.8,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
"version": "2.0"
},
{
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"author": "VULHUB",
"availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"baseScore": 10.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"id": "VHN-86059",
"impactScore": 10.0,
"integrityImpact": "COMPLETE",
"severity": "HIGH",
"trust": 0.1,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/AU:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
"version": "2.0"
}
],
"cvssV3": [
{
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"author": "nvd@nist.gov",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"id": "CVE-2015-8098",
"impactScore": 5.9,
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"trust": 1.0,
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"author": "nvd@nist.gov",
"id": "CVE-2015-8098",
"trust": 1.0,
"value": "CRITICAL"
},
{
"author": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2015-8098",
"trust": 0.8,
"value": "High"
},
{
"author": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201601-184",
"trust": 0.6,
"value": "CRITICAL"
},
{
"author": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-86059",
"trust": 0.1,
"value": "HIGH"
}
]
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-86059"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2015-006772"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201601-184"
},
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2015-8098"
}
]
},
"description": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/description#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": "F5 BIG-IP APM 11.4.1 before 11.4.1 HF9, 11.5.x before 11.5.3, and 11.6.0 before 11.6.0 HF4 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors related to processing a Citrix Remote Desktop connection through a virtual server configured with a remote desktop profile, aka an \"Out-of-bounds memory vulnerability.\". F5 BIG-IP APM There is a service disruption (DoS) Vulnerabilities exist that could be put into a state or execute arbitrary code. F5 BIG-IP APM is prone to a memory-corruption vulnerability. \nAn attacker can exploit this issue to execute arbitrary code within the context of the affected application. Failed exploit attempts may result in a denial-of-service condition. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is a set of access and security solutions from F5 Corporation of the United States. The solution provides unified access to business-critical applications and networks. The following versions are affected: F5 BIG-IP APM 11.4.1 prior to HF9, 11.4.1 prior to 11.5.3, 11.6.0 prior to 11.6.0 HF4",
"sources": [
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2015-8098"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2015-006772"
},
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "80022"
},
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-86059"
}
],
"trust": 1.98
},
"external_ids": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/external_ids#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": [
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2015-8098",
"trust": 2.8
},
{
"db": "SECTRACK",
"id": "1034609",
"trust": 1.7
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2015-006772",
"trust": 0.8
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201601-184",
"trust": 0.7
},
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "80022",
"trust": 0.4
},
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-86059",
"trust": 0.1
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-86059"
},
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "80022"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2015-006772"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201601-184"
},
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2015-8098"
}
]
},
"id": "VAR-201601-0396",
"iot": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/iot#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": true,
"sources": [
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-86059"
}
],
"trust": 0.5444825600000001
},
"last_update_date": "2025-04-13T23:26:39.926000Z",
"patch": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/patch#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": [
{
"title": "SOL43552605: Out-of-bounds memory vulnerability with the BIG-IP APM system CVE-2015-8098",
"trust": 0.8,
"url": "https://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/solutions/public/k/43/sol43552605.html"
},
{
"title": "F5 BIG-IP APM Security vulnerabilities",
"trust": 0.6,
"url": "http://www.cnnvd.org.cn/web/xxk/bdxqById.tag?id=59536"
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2015-006772"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201601-184"
}
]
},
"problemtype_data": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/problemtype_data#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": [
{
"problemtype": "CWE-119",
"trust": 1.9
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-86059"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2015-006772"
},
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2015-8098"
}
]
},
"references": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/references#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": [
{
"trust": 2.0,
"url": "https://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/solutions/public/k/43/sol43552605.html"
},
{
"trust": 1.7,
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034609"
},
{
"trust": 0.8,
"url": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=cve-2015-8098"
},
{
"trust": 0.8,
"url": "http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnid=cve-2015-8098"
},
{
"trust": 0.3,
"url": "https://f5.com/"
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-86059"
},
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "80022"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2015-006772"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201601-184"
},
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2015-8098"
}
]
},
"sources": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
}
},
"data": [
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-86059"
},
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "80022"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2015-006772"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201601-184"
},
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2015-8098"
}
]
},
"sources_release_date": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources_release_date#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
}
},
"data": [
{
"date": "2016-01-12T00:00:00",
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-86059"
},
{
"date": "2016-01-07T00:00:00",
"db": "BID",
"id": "80022"
},
{
"date": "2016-01-15T00:00:00",
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2015-006772"
},
{
"date": "2016-01-13T00:00:00",
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201601-184"
},
{
"date": "2016-01-12T19:59:08.003000",
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2015-8098"
}
]
},
"sources_update_date": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources_update_date#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
}
},
"data": [
{
"date": "2016-01-15T00:00:00",
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-86059"
},
{
"date": "2016-01-07T00:00:00",
"db": "BID",
"id": "80022"
},
{
"date": "2016-01-15T00:00:00",
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2015-006772"
},
{
"date": "2016-01-13T00:00:00",
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201601-184"
},
{
"date": "2025-04-12T10:46:40.837000",
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2015-8098"
}
]
},
"threat_type": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/threat_type#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": "remote",
"sources": [
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201601-184"
}
],
"trust": 0.6
},
"title": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/title#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": "F5 BIG-IP APM Service disruption in (DoS) Vulnerabilities",
"sources": [
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2015-006772"
}
],
"trust": 0.8
},
"type": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/type#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": "buffer overflow",
"sources": [
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-201601-184"
}
],
"trust": 0.6
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.