VAR-200607-0355
Vulnerability from variot - Updated: 2025-04-03 22:34Buffer overflow in Cisco Unified CallManager (CUCM) 5.0(1) through 5.0(3a) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long hostname in a SIP request, aka bug CSCsd96542. Cisco Unified CallManager is susceptible to multiple remote vulnerabilities. Cisco Unified CallManager is the software-based call-processing component of the Cisco IP telephony solution. Cisco Unified CallManager supports both SCCP and SIP telephony, which allows migration to SIP while still protecting investments in existing equipment.
Hardcore Disassembler / Reverse Engineer Wanted!
Want to work with IDA and BinDiff? Want to write PoC's and Exploits?
Your nationality is not important. We will get you a work permit, find an apartment, and offer a relocation compensation package.
http://secunia.com/hardcore_disassembler_and_reverse_engineer/
TITLE: Cisco Unified CallManager Multiple Vulnerabilities
SECUNIA ADVISORY ID: SA21030
VERIFY ADVISORY: http://secunia.com/advisories/21030/
CRITICAL: Highly critical
IMPACT: Privilege escalation, DoS, System access
WHERE:
From remote
SOFTWARE: Cisco Unified CallManager 5.x http://secunia.com/product/11019/
DESCRIPTION: Some vulnerabilities have been reported in Cisco Unified CallManager, which can be exploited by malicious, local users to gain escalated privileges or by malicious people to cause a DoS (Denial of Service) or compromise a vulnerable system.
1) Errors in various CLI commands can be exploited by an authenticated administrator to break out of the CLI environment and execute arbitrary Linux commands with root privileges.
2) An unspecified error makes it possible to for an authenticated administrator to overwrite arbitrary files or folders with output of CLI commands.
Successful exploitation causes a DoS or allows execution of arbitrary code.
The vulnerabilities have been reported in versions 5.0(1), 5.0(2), 5.0(3), and 5.0(3a).
SOLUTION: Update to version 5.0(4) or later.
PROVIDED AND/OR DISCOVERED BY: Reported by the vendor.
ORIGINAL ADVISORY: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20060712-cucm.shtml
About: This Advisory was delivered by Secunia as a free service to help everybody keeping their systems up to date against the latest vulnerabilities.
Subscribe: http://secunia.com/secunia_security_advisories/
Definitions: (Criticality, Where etc.) http://secunia.com/about_secunia_advisories/
Please Note: Secunia recommends that you verify all advisories you receive by clicking the link. Secunia NEVER sends attached files with advisories. Secunia does not advise people to install third party patches, only use those supplied by the vendor.
Unsubscribe: Secunia Security Advisories http://secunia.com/sec_adv_unsubscribe/?email=packet%40packetstormsecurity.org
Show details on source website
{
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/VARIoTentry#",
"affected_products": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/affected_products"
},
"configurations": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/configurations"
},
"credits": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/credits"
},
"cvss": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/cvss/"
},
"description": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/description/"
},
"exploit_availability": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/exploit_availability/"
},
"external_ids": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/external_ids/"
},
"iot": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/iot/"
},
"iot_taxonomy": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/iot_taxonomy/"
},
"patch": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/patch/"
},
"problemtype_data": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/problemtype_data/"
},
"references": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/references/"
},
"sources": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources/"
},
"sources_release_date": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources_release_date/"
},
"sources_update_date": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources_update_date/"
},
"threat_type": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/threat_type/"
},
"title": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/title/"
},
"type": {
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/type/"
}
},
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/vuln/VAR-200607-0355",
"affected_products": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/affected_products#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
},
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources"
}
},
"data": [
{
"model": "unified callmanager",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 1.6,
"vendor": "cisco",
"version": "5.0\\(1\\)"
},
{
"model": "unified callmanager",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 1.6,
"vendor": "cisco",
"version": "5.0\\(2\\)"
},
{
"model": "unified callmanager",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 1.6,
"vendor": "cisco",
"version": "5.0\\(3a\\)"
},
{
"model": "unified callmanager",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 1.6,
"vendor": "cisco",
"version": "5.0\\(3\\)"
},
{
"model": "unified callmanager",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 0.8,
"vendor": "cisco",
"version": "5.0(1) to 5.0(3a)"
},
{
"model": "unified callmanager 5.0",
"scope": null,
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "cisco",
"version": null
},
{
"model": "unified callmanager",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "cisco",
"version": "5.0(3)"
},
{
"model": "unified callmanager",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "cisco",
"version": "5.0(2)"
},
{
"model": "unified callmanager",
"scope": "eq",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "cisco",
"version": "5.0(1)"
},
{
"model": "unified callmanager",
"scope": "ne",
"trust": 0.3,
"vendor": "cisco",
"version": "5.0(4)"
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "18952"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2006-002754"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-200607-261"
},
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2006-3594"
}
]
},
"configurations": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/configurations#",
"children": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"cpe_match": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"nodes": {
"@container": "@list"
}
},
"data": [
{
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe22Uri": "cpe:/a:cisco:unified_callmanager",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2006-002754"
}
]
},
"credits": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/credits#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": "Cisco Security bulletin",
"sources": [
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-200607-261"
}
],
"trust": 0.6
},
"cve": "CVE-2006-3594",
"cvss": {
"@context": {
"cvssV2": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/cvss/cvssV2#"
},
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/cvss/cvssV2"
},
"cvssV3": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/cvss/cvssV3#"
},
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/cvss/cvssV3/"
},
"severity": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/cvss/severity#"
},
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/cvss/severity"
},
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
},
"@id": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources"
}
},
"data": [
{
"cvssV2": [
{
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"author": "nvd@nist.gov",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"id": "CVE-2006-3594",
"impactScore": 6.4,
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"severity": "HIGH",
"trust": 1.8,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
{
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"author": "VULHUB",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"id": "VHN-19702",
"impactScore": 6.4,
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"severity": "HIGH",
"trust": 0.1,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/AU:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
}
],
"cvssV3": [],
"severity": [
{
"author": "nvd@nist.gov",
"id": "CVE-2006-3594",
"trust": 1.0,
"value": "HIGH"
},
{
"author": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2006-3594",
"trust": 0.8,
"value": "High"
},
{
"author": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-200607-261",
"trust": 0.6,
"value": "HIGH"
},
{
"author": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-19702",
"trust": 0.1,
"value": "HIGH"
}
]
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-19702"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2006-002754"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-200607-261"
},
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2006-3594"
}
]
},
"description": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/description#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": "Buffer overflow in Cisco Unified CallManager (CUCM) 5.0(1) through 5.0(3a) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long hostname in a SIP request, aka bug CSCsd96542. Cisco Unified CallManager is susceptible to multiple remote vulnerabilities. Cisco Unified CallManager is the software-based call-processing component of the Cisco IP telephony solution. Cisco Unified CallManager supports both SCCP and SIP telephony, which allows migration to SIP while still protecting investments in existing equipment. \n\n----------------------------------------------------------------------\n\nHardcore Disassembler / Reverse Engineer Wanted!\n\nWant to work with IDA and BinDiff?\nWant to write PoC\u0027s and Exploits?\n\nYour nationality is not important. \nWe will get you a work permit, find an apartment, and offer a\nrelocation compensation package. \n\nhttp://secunia.com/hardcore_disassembler_and_reverse_engineer/\n\n----------------------------------------------------------------------\n\nTITLE:\nCisco Unified CallManager Multiple Vulnerabilities\n\nSECUNIA ADVISORY ID:\nSA21030\n\nVERIFY ADVISORY:\nhttp://secunia.com/advisories/21030/\n\nCRITICAL:\nHighly critical\n\nIMPACT:\nPrivilege escalation, DoS, System access\n\nWHERE:\n\u003eFrom remote\n\nSOFTWARE:\nCisco Unified CallManager 5.x\nhttp://secunia.com/product/11019/\n\nDESCRIPTION:\nSome vulnerabilities have been reported in Cisco Unified CallManager,\nwhich can be exploited by malicious, local users to gain escalated\nprivileges or by malicious people to cause a DoS (Denial of Service)\nor compromise a vulnerable system. \n\n1) Errors in various CLI commands can be exploited by an\nauthenticated administrator to break out of the CLI environment and\nexecute arbitrary Linux commands with root privileges. \n\n2) An unspecified error makes it possible to for an authenticated\nadministrator to overwrite arbitrary files or folders with output of\nCLI commands. \n\nSuccessful exploitation causes a DoS or allows execution of arbitrary\ncode. \n\nThe vulnerabilities have been reported in versions 5.0(1), 5.0(2),\n5.0(3), and 5.0(3a). \n\nSOLUTION:\nUpdate to version 5.0(4) or later. \n\nPROVIDED AND/OR DISCOVERED BY:\nReported by the vendor. \n\nORIGINAL ADVISORY:\nhttp://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20060712-cucm.shtml\n\n----------------------------------------------------------------------\n\nAbout:\nThis Advisory was delivered by Secunia as a free service to help\neverybody keeping their systems up to date against the latest\nvulnerabilities. \n\nSubscribe:\nhttp://secunia.com/secunia_security_advisories/\n\nDefinitions: (Criticality, Where etc.)\nhttp://secunia.com/about_secunia_advisories/\n\n\nPlease Note:\nSecunia recommends that you verify all advisories you receive by\nclicking the link. \nSecunia NEVER sends attached files with advisories. \nSecunia does not advise people to install third party patches, only\nuse those supplied by the vendor. \n\n----------------------------------------------------------------------\n\nUnsubscribe: Secunia Security Advisories\nhttp://secunia.com/sec_adv_unsubscribe/?email=packet%40packetstormsecurity.org\n\n----------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n",
"sources": [
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2006-3594"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2006-002754"
},
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "18952"
},
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-19702"
},
{
"db": "PACKETSTORM",
"id": "48213"
}
],
"trust": 2.07
},
"external_ids": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/external_ids#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": [
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2006-3594",
"trust": 2.8
},
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "18952",
"trust": 2.0
},
{
"db": "SECUNIA",
"id": "21030",
"trust": 1.8
},
{
"db": "SECTRACK",
"id": "1016475",
"trust": 1.7
},
{
"db": "OSVDB",
"id": "27162",
"trust": 1.7
},
{
"db": "VUPEN",
"id": "ADV-2006-2774",
"trust": 1.7
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2006-002754",
"trust": 0.8
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-200607-261",
"trust": 0.7
},
{
"db": "CISCO",
"id": "20060712 MULTIPLE CISCO UNIFIED CALLMANAGER VULNERABILITIES",
"trust": 0.6
},
{
"db": "XF",
"id": "27691",
"trust": 0.6
},
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-19702",
"trust": 0.1
},
{
"db": "PACKETSTORM",
"id": "48213",
"trust": 0.1
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-19702"
},
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "18952"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2006-002754"
},
{
"db": "PACKETSTORM",
"id": "48213"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-200607-261"
},
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2006-3594"
}
]
},
"id": "VAR-200607-0355",
"iot": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/iot#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": true,
"sources": [
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-19702"
}
],
"trust": 0.01
},
"last_update_date": "2025-04-03T22:34:48.676000Z",
"patch": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/patch#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": [
{
"title": "cisco-sa-20060712-cucm",
"trust": 0.8,
"url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20060712-cucm"
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2006-002754"
}
]
},
"problemtype_data": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/problemtype_data#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": [
{
"problemtype": "NVD-CWE-Other",
"trust": 1.0
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2006-3594"
}
]
},
"references": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/references#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
},
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": [
{
"trust": 2.1,
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20060712-cucm.shtml"
},
{
"trust": 1.7,
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18952"
},
{
"trust": 1.7,
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/27162"
},
{
"trust": 1.7,
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016475"
},
{
"trust": 1.7,
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21030"
},
{
"trust": 1.1,
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2774"
},
{
"trust": 1.1,
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/27691"
},
{
"trust": 0.8,
"url": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=cve-2006-3594"
},
{
"trust": 0.8,
"url": "http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnid=cve-2006-3594"
},
{
"trust": 0.6,
"url": "http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/27691"
},
{
"trust": 0.6,
"url": "http://www.frsirt.com/english/advisories/2006/2774"
},
{
"trust": 0.3,
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/index.html"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21030/"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_security_advisories/"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "http://secunia.com/hardcore_disassembler_and_reverse_engineer/"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "http://secunia.com/product/11019/"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "http://secunia.com/sec_adv_unsubscribe/?email=packet%40packetstormsecurity.org"
},
{
"trust": 0.1,
"url": "http://secunia.com/about_secunia_advisories/"
}
],
"sources": [
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-19702"
},
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "18952"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2006-002754"
},
{
"db": "PACKETSTORM",
"id": "48213"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-200607-261"
},
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2006-3594"
}
]
},
"sources": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
}
},
"data": [
{
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-19702"
},
{
"db": "BID",
"id": "18952"
},
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2006-002754"
},
{
"db": "PACKETSTORM",
"id": "48213"
},
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-200607-261"
},
{
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2006-3594"
}
]
},
"sources_release_date": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources_release_date#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
}
},
"data": [
{
"date": "2006-07-18T00:00:00",
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-19702"
},
{
"date": "2006-07-12T00:00:00",
"db": "BID",
"id": "18952"
},
{
"date": "2012-12-20T00:00:00",
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2006-002754"
},
{
"date": "2006-07-13T17:58:07",
"db": "PACKETSTORM",
"id": "48213"
},
{
"date": "2006-07-18T00:00:00",
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-200607-261"
},
{
"date": "2006-07-18T15:37:00",
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2006-3594"
}
]
},
"sources_update_date": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources_update_date#",
"data": {
"@container": "@list"
}
},
"data": [
{
"date": "2017-07-20T00:00:00",
"db": "VULHUB",
"id": "VHN-19702"
},
{
"date": "2016-07-05T21:38:00",
"db": "BID",
"id": "18952"
},
{
"date": "2012-12-20T00:00:00",
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2006-002754"
},
{
"date": "2006-07-19T00:00:00",
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-200607-261"
},
{
"date": "2025-04-03T01:03:51.193000",
"db": "NVD",
"id": "CVE-2006-3594"
}
]
},
"threat_type": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/threat_type#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": "remote",
"sources": [
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-200607-261"
}
],
"trust": 0.6
},
"title": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/title#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": "CUCM Vulnerable to buffer overflow",
"sources": [
{
"db": "JVNDB",
"id": "JVNDB-2006-002754"
}
],
"trust": 0.8
},
"type": {
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/type#",
"sources": {
"@container": "@list",
"@context": {
"@vocab": "https://www.variotdbs.pl/ref/sources#"
}
}
},
"data": "buffer overflow",
"sources": [
{
"db": "CNNVD",
"id": "CNNVD-200607-261"
}
],
"trust": 0.6
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.