USN-8989-1 (UBUNTU-CVE-2026-26961)
Vulnerability from osv_ubuntu – Published: 2026-11-03 17:12 – Updated: 2026-11-03 17:12 – Source websiteAndrew Lacambra discovered that Rack did not properly parse certain regular expressions. An attacker could possibly use this issue to bypass network security filters. (CVE-2026-26961)
William T. Nelson discovered that Rack did not handle multipart headers correctly. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause downstream parsing issues or a denial of service. (CVE-2026-26962)
It was discovered that Rack did not handle the Forwarded header correctly. An attacker could possibly use this issue to manipulate header values. (CVE-2026-32762)
It was discovered that Rack could consume excessive CPU when handling certain Accept-Encoding values. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2026-34230)
Haruki Oyama discovered that certain configurations of Rack could erroneously fail to derive the displayed directory path, and expose the full file system path. An attacker could possibly use this issue to disclose deployment details such as layout and usernames. (CVE-2026-34763)
It was discovered that Rack did not properly handle static file paths. An attacker could possibly use this issue to exfiltrate unintentionally served data. (CVE-2026-34785)
Haruki Oyama discovered that Rack did not apply header rules to certain requests for URL-encoded static paths. An attacker could possibly use this issue to bypass security-relevant response headers. (CVE-2026-34786)
It was discovered that Rack did not limit the number of ranges requested in the Range header. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2026-34826)
It was discovered that Rack could consume excessive CPU when parsing certain multipart parameters. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2026-34827)
It was discovered that Rack could consume unbounded disk space when handling requests without a Content-Length header. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2026-34829)
Mehtab Zafar discovered that Rack directly interpreted the X-Accel-Mapping header as a regular expression without escaping. An attacker could possibly use this issue to exfiltrate arbitrary files from internal locations. (CVE-2026-34830)
It was discovered that Rack did not properly handle messages with Unicode. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2026-34831)
It was discovered that Rack did not properly parse the Host header. An attacker could possibly use this issue to bypass security filters or poison generated links. (CVE-2026-34835)
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"cves_map": {
"cves": [
{
"id": "CVE-2026-26961",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2026-26962",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2026-32762",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2026-34230",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2026-34763",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2026-34785",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2026-34786",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2026-34826",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2026-34827",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2026-34829",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2026-34830",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2026-34831",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2026-34835",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
}
],
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:26.04:LTS"
}
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"availability": "No subscription required",
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "ruby-rack",
"binary_version": "3.2.4-1ubuntu1.1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:26.04:LTS",
"name": "ruby-rack",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/ruby-rack@3.2.4-1ubuntu1.1?arch=source\u0026distro=resolute"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.2.4-1ubuntu1.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"3.1.16-0.1",
"3.1.18-1",
"3.1.18-1build1",
"3.2.4-1ubuntu1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"details": "Andrew Lacambra discovered that Rack did not properly parse certain regular\nexpressions. An attacker could possibly use this issue to bypass network\nsecurity filters. (CVE-2026-26961)\n\nWilliam T. Nelson discovered that Rack did not handle multipart headers\ncorrectly. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause downstream\nparsing issues or a denial of service. (CVE-2026-26962)\n\nIt was discovered that Rack did not handle the Forwarded header correctly.\nAn attacker could possibly use this issue to manipulate header values.\n(CVE-2026-32762)\n\nIt was discovered that Rack could consume excessive CPU when handling\ncertain Accept-Encoding values. An attacker could possibly use this issue\nto cause a denial of service. (CVE-2026-34230)\n\nHaruki Oyama discovered that certain configurations of Rack could\nerroneously fail to derive the displayed directory path, and expose the\nfull file system path. An attacker could possibly use this issue to\ndisclose deployment details such as layout and usernames. (CVE-2026-34763)\n\nIt was discovered that Rack did not properly handle static file paths. An\nattacker could possibly use this issue to exfiltrate unintentionally served\ndata. (CVE-2026-34785)\n\nHaruki Oyama discovered that Rack did not apply header rules to certain\nrequests for URL-encoded static paths. An attacker could possibly use this\nissue to bypass security-relevant response headers. (CVE-2026-34786)\n\nIt was discovered that Rack did not limit the number of ranges requested in\nthe Range header. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a\ndenial of service. (CVE-2026-34826)\n\nIt was discovered that Rack could consume excessive CPU when parsing\ncertain multipart parameters. An attacker could possibly use this issue to\ncause a denial of service. (CVE-2026-34827)\n\nIt was discovered that Rack could consume unbounded disk space when\nhandling requests without a Content-Length header. An attacker could\npossibly use this issue to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2026-34829)\n\nMehtab Zafar discovered that Rack directly interpreted the X-Accel-Mapping\nheader as a regular expression without escaping. An attacker could possibly\nuse this issue to exfiltrate arbitrary files from internal locations.\n(CVE-2026-34830)\n\nIt was discovered that Rack did not properly handle messages with Unicode.\nAn attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a denial of service.\n(CVE-2026-34831)\n\nIt was discovered that Rack did not properly parse the Host header. An\nattacker could possibly use this issue to bypass security filters or poison\ngenerated links. (CVE-2026-34835)",
"id": "USN-8989-1",
"modified": "2026-11-03T17:12:03Z",
"published": "2026-11-03T17:12:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8989-1"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-26961"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-26962"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-32762"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-34230"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-34763"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-34785"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-34786"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-34826"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-34827"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-34829"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-34830"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-34831"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-34835"
}
],
"related": [],
"schema_version": "1.7.0",
"summary": "ruby-rack vulnerabilities",
"upstream": [
"UBUNTU-CVE-2026-26961",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2026-26962",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2026-32762",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2026-34230",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2026-34763",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2026-34785",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2026-34786",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2026-34826",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2026-34827",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2026-34829",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2026-34830",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2026-34831",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2026-34835"
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.