usn-2302-1
Vulnerability from osv_ubuntu
Published
2014-07-30 16:37
Modified
2026-02-10 04:40
Summary
tomcat6, tomcat7 vulnerabilities
Details
David Jorm discovered that Tomcat incorrectly handled certain requests submitted using chunked transfer encoding. A remote attacker could use this flaw to cause the Tomcat server to consume resources, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2014-0075)
It was discovered that Tomcat did not properly restrict XSLT stylesheets. An attacker could use this issue with a crafted web application to bypass security-manager restrictions and read arbitrary files. (CVE-2014-0096)
It was discovered that Tomcat incorrectly handled certain Content-Length headers. A remote attacker could use this flaw in configurations where Tomcat is behind a reverse proxy to perform HTTP request smuggling attacks. (CVE-2014-0099)
References
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"cves_map": {
"cves": [
{
"id": "CVE-2014-0075",
"severity": [
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2014-0096",
"severity": [
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
},
{
"id": "CVE-2014-0099",
"severity": [
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
]
}
],
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:14.04:LTS"
}
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"availability": "No subscription required",
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "libservlet3.0-java",
"binary_version": "7.0.52-1ubuntu0.1"
},
{
"binary_name": "libtomcat7-java",
"binary_version": "7.0.52-1ubuntu0.1"
},
{
"binary_name": "tomcat7",
"binary_version": "7.0.52-1ubuntu0.1"
},
{
"binary_name": "tomcat7-admin",
"binary_version": "7.0.52-1ubuntu0.1"
},
{
"binary_name": "tomcat7-common",
"binary_version": "7.0.52-1ubuntu0.1"
},
{
"binary_name": "tomcat7-docs",
"binary_version": "7.0.52-1ubuntu0.1"
},
{
"binary_name": "tomcat7-examples",
"binary_version": "7.0.52-1ubuntu0.1"
},
{
"binary_name": "tomcat7-user",
"binary_version": "7.0.52-1ubuntu0.1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:14.04:LTS",
"name": "tomcat7",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/tomcat7@7.0.52-1ubuntu0.1?arch=source\u0026distro=trusty"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "7.0.52-1ubuntu0.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"7.0.42-1",
"7.0.47-1",
"7.0.50-1",
"7.0.52-1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"details": "David Jorm discovered that Tomcat incorrectly handled certain requests\nsubmitted using chunked transfer encoding. A remote attacker could use this\nflaw to cause the Tomcat server to consume resources, resulting in a denial\nof service. (CVE-2014-0075)\n\nIt was discovered that Tomcat did not properly restrict XSLT stylesheets.\nAn attacker could use this issue with a crafted web application to bypass\nsecurity-manager restrictions and read arbitrary files. (CVE-2014-0096)\n\nIt was discovered that Tomcat incorrectly handled certain Content-Length\nheaders. A remote attacker could use this flaw in configurations where\nTomcat is behind a reverse proxy to perform HTTP request smuggling attacks.\n(CVE-2014-0099)\n",
"id": "USN-2302-1",
"modified": "2026-02-10T04:40:49Z",
"published": "2014-07-30T16:37:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-2302-1"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2014-0075"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2014-0096"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2014-0099"
}
],
"related": [],
"schema_version": "1.7.0",
"summary": "tomcat6, tomcat7 vulnerabilities",
"upstream": [
"UBUNTU-CVE-2014-0075",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2014-0096",
"UBUNTU-CVE-2014-0099"
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…