UBUNTU-CVE-2026-88017 (CVE-2026-88017)
Vulnerability from osv_ubuntu – Published: 2026-09-10 16:18 – Updated: 2026-09-16 11:43 – Source websiterclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. From 1.64.0 until 1.75.1, the FTP auth-proxy driver in cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go stores one obscured password per username in the server-wide userPass map[string]string instead of binding the credential or VFS to the authenticated session. If two accepted credentials use the same username but resolve to different proxy backends, a later CheckPasswd login overwrites userPass[user], and subsequent getVFS operations on the first session are reauthorized with the later password. The first session can then read, create, overwrite, rename, or delete objects using the second credential’s backend authority. Exploitation requires the later same-username login to occur while the first session remains open. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "golang-github-ncw-rclone-dev",
"binary_version": "1.36-3ubuntu0.2"
},
{
"binary_name": "rclone",
"binary_version": "1.36-3ubuntu0.2"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:18.04:LTS",
"name": "rclone",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/rclone@1.36-3ubuntu0.2?arch=source\u0026distro=bionic"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.36-3",
"1.36-3ubuntu0.1",
"1.36-3ubuntu0.2"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "golang-github-rclone-rclone-dev",
"binary_version": "1.50.2-2ubuntu0.2+esm1"
},
{
"binary_name": "rclone",
"binary_version": "1.50.2-2ubuntu0.2+esm1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS",
"name": "rclone",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/rclone@1.50.2-2ubuntu0.2+esm1?arch=source\u0026distro=esm-apps/focal"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.47.0+ex1-6",
"1.47.0+ex1-7",
"1.49.5-2",
"1.49.5-3",
"1.50.2-2",
"1.50.2-2ubuntu0.1",
"1.50.2-2ubuntu0.2",
"1.50.2-2ubuntu0.2+esm1"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "golang-github-rclone-rclone-dev",
"binary_version": "1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.5+esm1"
},
{
"binary_name": "rclone",
"binary_version": "1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.5+esm1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS",
"name": "rclone",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/rclone@1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.5+esm1?arch=source\u0026distro=esm-apps/jammy"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.53.3-1",
"1.53.3-2",
"1.53.3-4",
"1.53.3-4ubuntu1",
"1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.1",
"1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.2",
"1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.3",
"1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.3+esm1",
"1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.4",
"1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.4+esm1",
"1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.5",
"1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.5+esm1"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "golang-github-rclone-rclone-dev",
"binary_version": "1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.6+esm1"
},
{
"binary_name": "rclone",
"binary_version": "1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.6+esm1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:Pro:24.04:LTS",
"name": "rclone",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/rclone@1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.6+esm1?arch=source\u0026distro=esm-apps/noble"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.60.1+dfsg-2build1",
"1.60.1+dfsg-3",
"1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.1",
"1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.2",
"1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.3",
"1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.4",
"1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.4+esm1",
"1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.5",
"1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.5+esm1",
"1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.6",
"1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.6+esm1"
]
},
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"binaries": [
{
"binary_name": "golang-github-rclone-rclone-dev",
"binary_version": "1.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu3.2+esm1"
},
{
"binary_name": "rclone",
"binary_version": "1.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu3.2+esm1"
}
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Ubuntu:Pro:26.04:LTS",
"name": "rclone",
"purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/rclone@1.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu3.2+esm1?arch=source\u0026distro=esm-apps/resolute"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu2",
"1.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu3",
"1.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu3.1",
"1.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu3.1+esm1",
"1.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu3.2",
"1.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu3.2+esm1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"details": "rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. From 1.64.0 until 1.75.1, the FTP auth-proxy driver in cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go stores one obscured password per username in the server-wide userPass map[string]string instead of binding the credential or VFS to the authenticated session. If two accepted credentials use the same username but resolve to different proxy backends, a later CheckPasswd login overwrites userPass[user], and subsequent getVFS operations on the first session are reauthorized with the later password. The first session can then read, create, overwrite, rename, or delete objects using the second credential\u2019s backend authority. Exploitation requires the later same-username login to occur while the first session remains open. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.",
"id": "UBUNTU-CVE-2026-88017",
"modified": "2026-09-16T11:43:12Z",
"published": "2026-09-10T16:18:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-88017"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-88017"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/rclone/rclone/security/advisories/GHSA-c476-6w5q-jw77"
}
],
"related": [],
"schema_version": "1.7.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "medium",
"type": "Ubuntu"
}
],
"upstream": [
"CVE-2026-88017"
],
"withdrawn": "2026-09-24T10:39:27Z"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.