PYSEC-2026-2720
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2026-07-13 15:15 - Updated: 2026-07-13 16:05Missing Access Check on Channel Members Endpoint for Standard Channels
Affected Component
Channel members listing endpoint:
- backend/open_webui/routers/channels.py (lines 445-507, get_channel_members_by_id)
Affected Versions
Current main branch and likely all versions with the channels feature.
Description
The GET /api/v1/channels/{id}/members endpoint only checks membership for group and dm channel types (lines 467-469). For standard channels — including private ones — there is no channel_has_access check before returning the member list. Any authenticated user who knows a private channel's UUID can enumerate all users with access to that channel.
# Line 467-469: only group/dm channels are checked
if channel.type in ['group', 'dm']:
if not Channels.is_user_channel_member(channel.id, user.id, db=db):
raise HTTPException(...)
# Standard channels fall through with NO access check
Compare with other channel endpoints (e.g., get_channel_messages at line 688) which correctly call channel_has_access(user.id, channel, permission='read') for standard channels.
CVSS 3.1 Breakdown
| Metric | Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector | Network (N) | Exploited remotely via API call |
| Attack Complexity | Low (L) | Single API call, no special conditions |
| Privileges Required | Low (L) | Requires a valid user account |
| User Interaction | None (N) | No victim interaction required |
| Scope | Unchanged (U) | Impact is within the channel authorization boundary |
| Confidentiality | Low (L) | Leaks user identities and details for a private channel |
| Integrity | None (N) | No data modification |
| Availability | None (N) | No denial of service |
Attack Scenario
- Attacker obtains a private standard channel's UUID (via logs, browser history, URL observation, or other API responses).
- Attacker calls
GET /api/v1/channels/{id}/members. - The server returns the full list of permitted users including their IDs, names, emails, roles, and profile images.
- The attacker has no access to the channel's messages (those endpoints check access correctly), but now knows exactly who does.
Impact
- Leaks the identity and personal details of every user with access to a private channel
- Reveals organizational structure and project assignments
- Enables targeted social engineering against channel members
Preconditions
- Channels feature must be enabled (disabled by default)
- Attacker must know the channel UUID (not guessable, but obtainable through indirect means)
| Name | purl | open-webui | pkg:pypi/open-webui |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "open-webui",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/open-webui"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.9.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.1.124",
"0.1.125",
"0.2.0",
"0.2.1",
"0.2.2",
"0.2.3",
"0.2.4",
"0.2.5",
"0.3.0",
"0.3.1",
"0.3.10",
"0.3.12",
"0.3.13",
"0.3.14",
"0.3.15",
"0.3.16",
"0.3.17",
"0.3.17.dev2",
"0.3.17.dev3",
"0.3.17.dev4",
"0.3.17.dev5",
"0.3.18",
"0.3.19",
"0.3.2",
"0.3.20",
"0.3.21",
"0.3.22",
"0.3.23",
"0.3.24",
"0.3.25",
"0.3.26",
"0.3.27",
"0.3.27.dev1",
"0.3.27.dev2",
"0.3.27.dev3",
"0.3.28",
"0.3.29",
"0.3.3",
"0.3.30",
"0.3.30.dev1",
"0.3.30.dev2",
"0.3.31",
"0.3.31.dev1",
"0.3.32",
"0.3.33",
"0.3.33.dev1",
"0.3.34",
"0.3.35",
"0.3.4",
"0.3.5",
"0.3.6",
"0.3.7",
"0.3.8",
"0.3.9",
"0.4.0",
"0.4.0.dev1",
"0.4.0.dev2",
"0.4.1",
"0.4.2",
"0.4.3",
"0.4.4",
"0.4.5",
"0.4.6",
"0.4.6.dev1",
"0.4.7",
"0.4.8",
"0.5.0",
"0.5.0.dev1",
"0.5.0.dev2",
"0.5.1",
"0.5.10",
"0.5.11",
"0.5.12",
"0.5.13",
"0.5.14",
"0.5.15",
"0.5.16",
"0.5.17",
"0.5.18",
"0.5.19",
"0.5.2",
"0.5.20",
"0.5.3",
"0.5.3.dev1",
"0.5.4",
"0.5.5",
"0.5.6",
"0.5.7",
"0.5.8",
"0.5.9",
"0.6.0",
"0.6.1",
"0.6.10",
"0.6.11",
"0.6.12",
"0.6.13",
"0.6.14",
"0.6.15",
"0.6.16",
"0.6.18",
"0.6.19",
"0.6.2",
"0.6.20",
"0.6.21",
"0.6.22",
"0.6.23",
"0.6.24",
"0.6.25",
"0.6.26",
"0.6.26.dev1",
"0.6.27",
"0.6.28",
"0.6.29",
"0.6.3",
"0.6.30",
"0.6.31",
"0.6.32",
"0.6.33",
"0.6.34",
"0.6.35",
"0.6.36",
"0.6.37",
"0.6.38",
"0.6.39",
"0.6.4",
"0.6.40",
"0.6.41",
"0.6.42",
"0.6.43",
"0.6.5",
"0.6.6",
"0.6.6.dev1",
"0.6.7",
"0.6.8",
"0.6.9",
"0.7.0",
"0.7.1",
"0.7.2",
"0.8.0",
"0.8.1",
"0.8.10",
"0.8.11",
"0.8.12",
"0.8.2",
"0.8.3",
"0.8.4",
"0.8.5",
"0.8.6",
"0.8.7",
"0.8.8",
"0.8.9"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-44559",
"GHSA-c7wp-3qh5-55pv"
],
"details": "# Missing Access Check on Channel Members Endpoint for Standard Channels\n\n## Affected Component\n\nChannel members listing endpoint:\n- `backend/open_webui/routers/channels.py` (lines 445-507, `get_channel_members_by_id`)\n\n## Affected Versions\n\nCurrent main branch and likely all versions with the channels feature.\n\n## Description\n\nThe `GET /api/v1/channels/{id}/members` endpoint only checks membership for `group` and `dm` channel types (lines 467-469). For standard channels \u2014 including private ones \u2014 there is no `channel_has_access` check before returning the member list. Any authenticated user who knows a private channel\u0027s UUID can enumerate all users with access to that channel.\n\n```python\n# Line 467-469: only group/dm channels are checked\nif channel.type in [\u0027group\u0027, \u0027dm\u0027]:\n if not Channels.is_user_channel_member(channel.id, user.id, db=db):\n raise HTTPException(...)\n# Standard channels fall through with NO access check\n```\n\nCompare with other channel endpoints (e.g., `get_channel_messages` at line 688) which correctly call `channel_has_access(user.id, channel, permission=\u0027read\u0027)` for standard channels.\n\n## CVSS 3.1 Breakdown\n\n| Metric | Value | Rationale |\n|--------|-------|-----------|\n| Attack Vector | Network (N) | Exploited remotely via API call |\n| Attack Complexity | Low (L) | Single API call, no special conditions |\n| Privileges Required | Low (L) | Requires a valid user account |\n| User Interaction | None (N) | No victim interaction required |\n| Scope | Unchanged (U) | Impact is within the channel authorization boundary |\n| Confidentiality | Low (L) | Leaks user identities and details for a private channel |\n| Integrity | None (N) | No data modification |\n| Availability | None (N) | No denial of service |\n\n## Attack Scenario\n\n1. Attacker obtains a private standard channel\u0027s UUID (via logs, browser history, URL observation, or other API responses).\n2. Attacker calls `GET /api/v1/channels/{id}/members`.\n3. The server returns the full list of permitted users including their IDs, names, emails, roles, and profile images.\n4. The attacker has no access to the channel\u0027s messages (those endpoints check access correctly), but now knows exactly who does.\n\n## Impact\n\n- Leaks the identity and personal details of every user with access to a private channel\n- Reveals organizational structure and project assignments\n- Enables targeted social engineering against channel members\n\n## Preconditions\n\n- Channels feature must be enabled (disabled by default)\n- Attacker must know the channel UUID (not guessable, but obtainable through indirect means)",
"id": "PYSEC-2026-2720",
"modified": "2026-07-13T16:05:12.164300Z",
"published": "2026-07-13T15:15:42.243379Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-c7wp-3qh5-55pv"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44559"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://pypi.org/project/open-webui"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-c7wp-3qh5-55pv"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Open WebUI Missing Access Check on Channel Members Endpoint for Standard Channels"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.