PYSEC-2026-1718
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2026-07-07 11:45 - Updated: 2026-07-07 17:24Background
There is currently no escaping or validation of the callback parameter that can be passed to various OMERO.web endpoints that have JSONP enabled. One such endpoint is /webclient/imgData/.... As we only really use these endpoints with jQuery's own callback name generation ^1 it is quite difficult or even impossible to exploit this in vanilla OMERO.web. However, these metadata endpoints are likely to be used by many plugins.
Impact
OMERO.web before 5.25.0
Patches
Users should upgrade to 5.26.0 or higher
Workarounds
None
References
- https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2777021/do-i-need-to-sanitize-the-callback-parameter-from-a-jsonp-call
- https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1661197/what-characters-are-valid-for-javascript-variable-names
For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
Open an issue in omero-web Email us at security@openmicroscopy.org
| Name | purl | omero-web | pkg:pypi/omero-web |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "omero-web",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/omero-web"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.26.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"5.10.0",
"5.11.0",
"5.11.0rc1",
"5.12.0",
"5.12.1",
"5.13.0",
"5.14.0",
"5.14.0rc1",
"5.14.1",
"5.15.0",
"5.16.0",
"5.17.0",
"5.18.0",
"5.19.0",
"5.20.0",
"5.21.0",
"5.22.0",
"5.22.1",
"5.23.0",
"5.23.1.dev0",
"5.24.0",
"5.25.0",
"5.5.dev1",
"5.5.dev2",
"5.6.0",
"5.6.1",
"5.6.2",
"5.6.3",
"5.6.dev1",
"5.6.dev2",
"5.6.dev3",
"5.6.dev4",
"5.6.dev5",
"5.6.dev6",
"5.6.dev7",
"5.7.0",
"5.7.1",
"5.8.0",
"5.8.1",
"5.9.0",
"5.9.1",
"5.9.2"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-35180",
"GHSA-vr85-5pwx-c6gq"
],
"details": "### Background\n\nThere is currently no escaping or validation of the `callback` parameter that can be passed to various OMERO.web endpoints that have JSONP enabled. One such endpoint is `/webclient/imgData/...`. As we only really use these endpoints with jQuery\u0027s own callback name generation [^1] it is quite difficult or even impossible to exploit this in vanilla OMERO.web. However, these metadata endpoints are likely to be used by many plugins.\n\n[^1]: https://learn.jquery.com/ajax/working-with-jsonp/\n\n### Impact\nOMERO.web before 5.25.0\n\n### Patches\nUsers should upgrade to 5.26.0 or higher\n### Workarounds\n\nNone\n\n### References\n* https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2777021/do-i-need-to-sanitize-the-callback-parameter-from-a-jsonp-call\n* https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1661197/what-characters-are-valid-for-javascript-variable-names\n\nFor more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n\nOpen an issue in [omero-web](https://github.com/ome/omero-web)\nEmail us at [security@openmicroscopy.org](mailto:security@openmicroscopy.org)\n",
"id": "PYSEC-2026-1718",
"modified": "2026-07-07T17:24:53.504783Z",
"published": "2026-07-07T11:45:43.042429Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ome/omero-web/security/advisories/GHSA-vr85-5pwx-c6gq"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35180"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ome/omero-web/commit/d41207cbb82afc56ea79e84db532608aa24ab4aa"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/ome/omero-web"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://pypi.org/project/omero-web"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-vr85-5pwx-c6gq"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "OMERO.web must check that the JSONP callback is a valid function"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.