PYSEC-2026-1676

Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2026-07-07 11:45 - Updated: 2026-07-07 17:24
VLAI
Details

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted? SSRF vulnerability in firebase database check logic. The attacker can cause the server to make a connection to internal-only services within the organization’s infrastructure. When malicious app is uploaded to Static analyzer, it is possible to make internal requests.

Credits: Oleg Surnin (Positive Technologies).

Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to? v3.9.8 and above

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading? Code level patch

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more? https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/pull/2373

Severity
6.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Impacted products
Name purl
mobsf pkg:pypi/mobsf
Aliases
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "mobsf",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/mobsf"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.9.8"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "3.2.6",
        "3.2.7",
        "3.2.8",
        "3.2.9",
        "3.3.3",
        "3.3.5",
        "3.4.0",
        "3.4.3",
        "3.4.6",
        "3.5.0",
        "3.6.0",
        "3.6.9",
        "3.7.6",
        "3.9.7"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-31215",
    "GHSA-wpff-wm84-x5cx"
  ],
  "details": "### Impact\n_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_\nSSRF vulnerability in firebase database check logic. The attacker can cause the server to make a connection to internal-only services within the organization\u2019s infrastructure. When malicious app is uploaded to Static analyzer, it is possible to make internal requests.\n\nCredits:  Oleg Surnin (Positive Technologies).\n\n### Patches\n_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_\nv3.9.8 and above\n\n### Workarounds\n_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_\nCode level patch\n\n### References\n_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_\nhttps://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/pull/2373",
  "id": "PYSEC-2026-1676",
  "modified": "2026-07-07T17:24:45.146301Z",
  "published": "2026-07-07T11:45:37.418995Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/security/advisories/GHSA-wpff-wm84-x5cx"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-31215"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/pull/2373"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/commit/43bb71d115d78c03faa82d75445dd908e9b32716"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://pypi.org/project/mobsf"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-wpff-wm84-x5cx"
    }
  ],
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) vulnerable to SSRF in firebase database check"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.