PYSEC-2026-1084
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2026-07-07 11:45 - Updated: 2026-07-07 17:23aimhubio/aim is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), allowing attackers to perform actions such as deleting runs, updating data, and stealing data like log records and notes without the user's consent. The vulnerability stems from the lack of CSRF and CORS protection in the aim dashboard. An attacker can exploit this by tricking a user into executing a malicious script that sends unauthorized requests to the aim server, leading to potential data loss and unauthorized data manipulation.
| Name | purl | aim | pkg:pypi/aim |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "aim",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/aim"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "3.17.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"2.0.19",
"2.0.20",
"2.0.21",
"2.0.22",
"2.0.23",
"2.0.24",
"2.0.25",
"2.0.26",
"2.0.27",
"2.1.0",
"2.1.1",
"2.1.2",
"2.1.3",
"2.1.4",
"2.1.5",
"2.1.6",
"2.2.0",
"2.2.1",
"2.3.0",
"2.4.0",
"2.5.0",
"2.6.0",
"2.7.0",
"2.7.1",
"2.7.2",
"2.7.3",
"2.7.4",
"3.0.0",
"3.0.1",
"3.0.2",
"3.0.3",
"3.0.4",
"3.0.5",
"3.0.6",
"3.0.7",
"3.1.0",
"3.1.1",
"3.10.0",
"3.10.0.dev9",
"3.10.1",
"3.10.2",
"3.10.3",
"3.11.0",
"3.11.0.dev4",
"3.11.1",
"3.11.1.dev1",
"3.11.2",
"3.12.0",
"3.12.0.dev2",
"3.12.1",
"3.12.2",
"3.13.0",
"3.13.1",
"3.13.2",
"3.13.3",
"3.13.4",
"3.14.0",
"3.14.1",
"3.14.2",
"3.14.3",
"3.14.4",
"3.15.0",
"3.15.1",
"3.15.2",
"3.16.0",
"3.16.1",
"3.16.2",
"3.17.0",
"3.17.1",
"3.17.2",
"3.17.3",
"3.17.4",
"3.17.5",
"3.17.5rc1",
"3.17.5rc2",
"3.17.5rc3",
"3.17.5rc4",
"3.2.0",
"3.2.1",
"3.2.2",
"3.3.0",
"3.3.1",
"3.3.2",
"3.3.3",
"3.3.4",
"3.3.5",
"3.4.0",
"3.4.1",
"3.5.0",
"3.5.1",
"3.5.2",
"3.5.3",
"3.5.4",
"3.6.0",
"3.6.1",
"3.6.2",
"3.6.3",
"3.7.0",
"3.7.1",
"3.7.2",
"3.7.3",
"3.7.4",
"3.7.5",
"3.8.0",
"3.8.1",
"3.9.0a1",
"3.9.0a14",
"3.9.2",
"3.9.3",
"3.9.4"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-2196",
"GHSA-99w2-67h8-5948"
],
"details": "aimhubio/aim is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), allowing attackers to perform actions such as deleting runs, updating data, and stealing data like log records and notes without the user\u0027s consent. The vulnerability stems from the lack of CSRF and CORS protection in the aim dashboard. An attacker can exploit this by tricking a user into executing a malicious script that sends unauthorized requests to the aim server, leading to potential data loss and unauthorized data manipulation.",
"id": "PYSEC-2026-1084",
"modified": "2026-07-07T17:23:34.067387Z",
"published": "2026-07-07T11:45:38.143791Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-2196"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/aimhubio/aim"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/e141e3f2-afbb-405f-a891-f66628c8b68f"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://pypi.org/project/aim"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-99w2-67h8-5948"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Aim Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability allows user to delete runs and perform other operations"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.