PYSEC-2021-326
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2021-09-09 15:15 - Updated: 2021-09-21 14:26The variable import endpoint was not protected by authentication in Airflow >=2.0.0, <2.1.3. This allowed unauthenticated users to hit that endpoint to add/modify Airflow variables used in DAGs, potentially resulting in a denial of service, information disclosure or remote code execution. This issue affects Apache Airflow >=2.0.0, <2.1.3.
| Name | purl | apache-airflow | pkg:pypi/apache-airflow |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "apache-airflow",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/apache-airflow"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.1.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"2.0.0",
"2.0.1",
"2.0.1rc1",
"2.0.1rc2",
"2.0.2",
"2.0.2rc1",
"2.1.0",
"2.1.0rc1",
"2.1.0rc2",
"2.1.1",
"2.1.1rc1",
"2.1.2",
"2.1.2rc1",
"2.1.3rc1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-38540",
"GHSA-h88f-r7cw-8fv3"
],
"details": "The variable import endpoint was not protected by authentication in Airflow \u003e=2.0.0, \u003c2.1.3. This allowed unauthenticated users to hit that endpoint to add/modify Airflow variables used in DAGs, potentially resulting in a denial of service, information disclosure or remote code execution. This issue affects Apache Airflow \u003e=2.0.0, \u003c2.1.3.",
"id": "PYSEC-2021-326",
"modified": "2021-09-21T14:26:17.443988Z",
"published": "2021-09-09T15:15:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb34c3dd1a815456355217eef34060789f771b6f77c3a3dec77de2064%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rac2ed9118f64733e47b4f1e82ddc8c8020774698f13328ca742b03a2@%3Cannounce.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-h88f-r7cw-8fv3"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.