PYSEC-2019-215
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2019-04-10 20:29 - Updated: 2021-11-16 03:58A number of HTTP endpoints in the Airflow webserver (both RBAC and classic) did not have adequate protection and were vulnerable to cross-site request forgery attacks.
| Name | purl | apache-airflow | pkg:pypi/apache-airflow |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "apache-airflow",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/apache-airflow"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.10.3b1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.10.0",
"1.10.1",
"1.10.1b1",
"1.10.1rc2",
"1.10.2",
"1.10.2b2",
"1.10.2rc1",
"1.10.2rc2",
"1.10.2rc3",
"1.8.1",
"1.8.2",
"1.8.2rc1",
"1.9.0"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-0229",
"GHSA-w6j4-3gh2-9f5j"
],
"details": "A number of HTTP endpoints in the Airflow webserver (both RBAC and classic) did not have adequate protection and were vulnerable to cross-site request forgery attacks.",
"id": "PYSEC-2019-215",
"modified": "2021-11-16T03:58:43.176949Z",
"published": "2019-04-10T20:29:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2de387213d45bc626d27554a1bde7b8c67d08720901f82a50b6f4231@%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/04/10/6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107869"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w6j4-3gh2-9f5j"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.