PYSEC-2017-28
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2017-01-23 21:59 - Updated: 2021-07-05 00:01python-jose before 1.3.2 allows attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to use a constant time comparison for HMAC keys.
| Name | purl | python-jose | pkg:pypi/python-jose |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "python-jose",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/python-jose"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.3.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.1.0",
"0.1.1",
"0.1.2",
"0.1.3",
"0.1.4",
"0.1.5",
"0.1.6",
"0.1.7",
"0.1.8",
"0.2.0",
"0.3.0",
"0.4.0",
"0.5.0",
"0.5.1",
"0.5.2",
"0.5.3",
"0.5.4",
"0.5.5",
"0.5.6",
"0.6.1",
"0.6.2",
"0.7.0",
"1.0.0",
"1.1.0",
"1.2.0",
"1.3.0",
"1.3.1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-7036",
"GHSA-w799-prg3-cx77"
],
"details": "python-jose before 1.3.2 allows attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to use a constant time comparison for HMAC keys.",
"id": "PYSEC-2017-28",
"modified": "2021-07-05T00:01:25.423622Z",
"published": "2017-01-23T21:59:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mpdavis/python-jose/releases/tag/1.3.2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mpdavis/python-jose/pull/35/commits/89b46353b9f611e9da38de3d2fedf52331167b93"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95845"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w799-prg3-cx77"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.