PYSEC-2014-81
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2014-01-18 21:55 - Updated: 2021-08-27 03:42httplib2 0.7.2, 0.8, and earlier, after an initial connection is made, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.
| Name | purl | httplib2 | pkg:pypi/httplib2 |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "httplib2",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/httplib2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.9"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.7.0",
"0.7.1",
"0.7.2",
"0.7.3",
"0.7.4",
"0.7.5",
"0.7.6",
"0.7.7",
"0.8"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-2037",
"GHSA-q48q-77qv-cf9p"
],
"details": "httplib2 0.7.2, 0.8, and earlier, after an initial connection is made, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject\u0027s Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.",
"id": "PYSEC-2014-81",
"modified": "2021-08-27T03:42:09.595120Z",
"published": "2014-01-18T21:55:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1948-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706602"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2013/q2/257"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://code.google.com/p/httplib2/issues/detail?id=282"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugs.launchpad.net/httplib2/+bug/1175272"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52179"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q48q-77qv-cf9p"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.