OESA-2026-2944 (CVE-2023-53159)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2026-07-09 11:11 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:11 – Source websiterpm-ostree is a hybrid image/package system. It supports "composing" packages on a build server into an OSTree repository, which can then be replicated by client systems with atomic upgrades. Additionally, unlike many "pure" image systems, with rpm-ostree each client system can layer on additional packages, providing a "best of both worlds" approach.
Security Fix(es):
The openssl crate before 0.10.55 for Rust allows an out-of-bounds read via an empty string to X509VerifyParamRef::set_host.(CVE-2023-53159)
Improper Validation of Unsafe Equivalence in punycode by the idna crate from Servo rust-url allows an attacker to create a punycode hostname that one part of a system might treat as distinct while another part of that system would treat as equivalent to another hostname.(CVE-2024-12224)
A flaw was found in OpenSSL's handling of the properties argument in certain functions. This vulnerability can allow use-after-free exploitation, which may result in undefined behavior or incorrect property parsing, leading to OpenSSL treating the input as an empty string.(CVE-2025-3416)
| URL | Type | |
|---|---|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"rpm-ostree-2022.16-11.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"rpm-ostree-debuginfo-2022.16-11.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"rpm-ostree-debugsource-2022.16-11.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"rpm-ostree-devel-2022.16-11.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"noarch": [
"rpm-ostree-help-2022.16-11.oe2203sp4.noarch.rpm"
],
"src": [
"rpm-ostree-2022.16-11.oe2203sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"rpm-ostree-2022.16-11.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"rpm-ostree-debuginfo-2022.16-11.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"rpm-ostree-debugsource-2022.16-11.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"rpm-ostree-devel-2022.16-11.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "rpm-ostree",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/rpm-ostree\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2022.16-11.oe2203sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Critical"
},
"details": "rpm-ostree is a hybrid image/package system. It supports \u0026amp;quot;composing\u0026amp;quot; packages on a build server into an OSTree repository, which can then be replicated by client systems with atomic upgrades. Additionally, unlike many \u0026amp;quot;pure\u0026amp;quot; image systems, with rpm-ostree each client system can layer on additional packages, providing a \u0026amp;quot;best of both worlds\u0026amp;quot; approach.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nThe openssl crate before 0.10.55 for Rust allows an out-of-bounds read via an empty string to X509VerifyParamRef::set_host.(CVE-2023-53159)\n\nImproper Validation of Unsafe Equivalence in punycode by the idna crate from Servo rust-url allows an attacker to create a punycode hostname that one part of a system might treat as distinct while another part of that system would treat as equivalent to another hostname.(CVE-2024-12224)\n\nA flaw was found in OpenSSL\u0026apos;s handling of the properties argument in certain functions. This vulnerability can allow use-after-free exploitation, which may result in undefined behavior or incorrect property parsing, leading to OpenSSL treating the input as an empty string.(CVE-2025-3416)",
"id": "OESA-2026-2944",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:11:51Z",
"published": "2026-07-09T11:11:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2944"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53159"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12224"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-3416"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "rpm-ostree security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2023-53159",
"CVE-2024-12224",
"CVE-2025-3416"
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.