MSRC_CVE-2022-33637
Vulnerability from csaf_microsoft - Published: 2022-07-12 07:00 - Updated: 2025-07-08 07:00| Product | Identifier | Version | Remediation |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Linux 101.68.80
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Linux
|
101.68.80 |
| Product | Identifier | Version | Remediation |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Linux <101.68.80
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Linux
|
<101.68.80 |
Vendor Fix
fix
|
{
"document": {
"acknowledgments": [
{
"names": [
"James Sharpe with \u003ca href=\"https://www.zenotech.com/\"\u003eZenotech Ltd\u003c/a\u003e"
]
}
],
"aggregate_severity": {
"namespace": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/msrc/security-update-severity-rating-system",
"text": "Important"
},
"category": "csaf_security_advisory",
"csaf_version": "2.0",
"distribution": {
"text": "Public",
"tlp": {
"label": "WHITE",
"url": "https://www.first.org/tlp/"
}
},
"lang": "en-US",
"notes": [
{
"category": "general",
"text": "To determine the support lifecycle for your software, see the Microsoft Support Lifecycle: https://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle",
"title": "Additional Resources"
},
{
"category": "legal_disclaimer",
"text": "The information provided in the Microsoft Knowledge Base is provided \\\"as is\\\" without warranty of any kind. Microsoft disclaims all warranties, either express or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall Microsoft Corporation or its suppliers be liable for any damages whatsoever including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, loss of business profits or special damages, even if Microsoft Corporation or its suppliers have been advised of the possibility of such damages. Some states do not allow the exclusion or limitation of liability for consequential or incidental damages so the foregoing limitation may not apply.",
"title": "Disclaimer"
},
{
"category": "general",
"text": "Required. The vulnerability documented by this CVE requires customer action to resolve.",
"title": "Customer Action"
}
],
"publisher": {
"category": "vendor",
"contact_details": "secure@microsoft.com",
"name": "Microsoft Security Response Center",
"namespace": "https://msrc.microsoft.com"
},
"references": [
{
"category": "self",
"summary": "CVE-2022-33637 Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Tampering Vulnerability - HTML",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-33637"
},
{
"category": "self",
"summary": "CVE-2022-33637 Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Tampering Vulnerability - CSAF",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/advisories/2022/msrc_cve-2022-33637.json"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "Microsoft Exploitability Index",
"url": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/msrc/exploitability-index?rtc=1"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "Microsoft Support Lifecycle",
"url": "https://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "Common Vulnerability Scoring System",
"url": "https://www.first.org/cvss"
}
],
"title": "Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Tampering Vulnerability",
"tracking": {
"current_release_date": "2025-07-08T07:00:00.000Z",
"generator": {
"date": "2025-07-08T15:35:54.239Z",
"engine": {
"name": "MSRC Generator",
"version": "1.0"
}
},
"id": "msrc_CVE-2022-33637",
"initial_release_date": "2022-07-12T07:00:00.000Z",
"revision_history": [
{
"date": "2022-07-12T07:00:00.000Z",
"legacy_version": "1",
"number": "1",
"summary": "Information published."
},
{
"date": "2022-07-25T07:00:00.000Z",
"legacy_version": "1.1",
"number": "2",
"summary": "Added FAQ information. This is an informational change only."
},
{
"date": "2025-07-08T07:00:00.000Z",
"legacy_version": "1.2",
"number": "3",
"summary": "Updated links to security updates. This is an informational change only."
}
],
"status": "final",
"version": "3"
}
},
"product_tree": {
"branches": [
{
"branches": [
{
"category": "product_version_range",
"name": "\u003c101.68.80",
"product": {
"name": "Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Linux \u003c101.68.80",
"product_id": "1"
}
},
{
"category": "product_version",
"name": "101.68.80",
"product": {
"name": "Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Linux 101.68.80",
"product_id": "12015"
}
}
],
"category": "product_name",
"name": "Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Linux"
}
]
},
"vulnerabilities": [
{
"cve": "CVE-2022-33637",
"notes": [
{
"category": "general",
"text": "Microsoft",
"title": "Assigning CNA"
},
{
"category": "faq",
"text": "This is a client-side code vulnerability consisting of the usage of uninitialized buffer in the buffer pool by the MDE sensor on Linux systems. This affects the IP field, causing any remote connection, including failed connections, to be considered as \u2018Successful remote logon\u2019. This, in turn, triggers a false-positive alert.\nAll Linux machines are affected. The impact is more severe on servers which are under heavy network/login load.\nThe fix enforced full initialization for each buffer before use.\nThe fix is included in defender version 101.68.80. Customers are advised to ensure their Defender client is the latest version.",
"title": "What is the nature of this vulnerability?"
}
],
"product_status": {
"fixed": [
"12015"
],
"known_affected": [
"1"
]
},
"references": [
{
"category": "self",
"summary": "CVE-2022-33637 Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Tampering Vulnerability - HTML",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2022-33637"
},
{
"category": "self",
"summary": "CVE-2022-33637 Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Tampering Vulnerability - CSAF",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/advisories/2022/msrc_cve-2022-33637.json"
}
],
"remediations": [
{
"category": "vendor_fix",
"date": "2022-07-12T07:00:00.000Z",
"details": "101.68.80:Security Update:https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/security/defender-endpoint/linux-updates?view=o365-worldwide",
"product_ids": [
"1"
],
"url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/security/defender-endpoint/linux-updates?view=o365-worldwide"
}
],
"scores": [
{
"cvss_v3": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"environmentalsScore": 0.0,
"exploitCodeMaturity": "UNPROVEN",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"remediationLevel": "OFFICIAL_FIX",
"reportConfidence": "CONFIRMED",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"temporalScore": 5.7,
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
},
"products": [
"1"
]
}
],
"threats": [
{
"category": "impact",
"details": "Tampering"
},
{
"category": "exploit_status",
"details": "Publicly Disclosed:No;Exploited:No;Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely;Older Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely"
}
],
"title": "Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Tampering Vulnerability"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.