MOKSHA-2026-0017 (moksha-2026-0017)
Vulnerability from moksha – Published: 2026-04-24 06:00 – Updated:
VLAI
Title
Static Route Injection via Network.other_config
Summary
A pool-operator in XAPI-based hypervisors (XenServer, XCP-ng) can inject arbitrary static routes into the host routing table by setting Network.other_config:static-routes to attacker-controlled subnet/gateway pairs. The value is parsed by nm.ml and applied directly to the bridge interface with no validation on subnet, gateway reachability, or conflicts with existing routes. Injected routes redirect storage network traffic, management traffic, or cloud subnet traffic through an attacker-controlled gateway.
Severity
References
1 reference
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud Software Group | XenServer |
Affected:
all
(custom)
|
|
| Vates | XCP-ng |
Affected:
all
(custom)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "XenServer",
"vendor": "Cloud Software Group",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "all",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "XCP-ng",
"vendor": "Vates",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "all",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jakob Wolffhechel, Moksha"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A pool-operator in XAPI-based hypervisors (XenServer, XCP-ng) can inject arbitrary static routes into the host routing table by setting Network.other_config:static-routes to attacker-controlled subnet/gateway pairs. The value is parsed by nm.ml and applied directly to the bridge interface with no validation on subnet, gateway reachability, or conflicts with existing routes. Injected routes redirect storage network traffic, management traffic, or cloud subnet traffic through an attacker-controlled gateway."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 7.0,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N",
"version": "4.0"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-862",
"description": "Missing Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-20",
"description": "Improper Input Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T06:00:00Z",
"orgId": "moksha.dk",
"shortName": "Moksha"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cna.moksha.dk/MOKSHA-2026-0017"
}
],
"title": "Static Route Injection via Network.other_config"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"alternateIds": [
"GCVE-117-2026-0017"
],
"assignerOrgId": "moksha.dk",
"cveId": "MOKSHA-2026-0017",
"datePublished": "2026-04-24T06:00:00Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED",
"x_moksha_note": "Self-issued advisory. MOKSHA-2026-NNNN is not a MITRE CVE ID. Schema follows CVE JSON 5.1 for tooling compatibility. alternateIds contains GCVE cross-references (GNA #117) and will also carry MITRE CVE IDs if assigned."
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…