mal-2026-13660
Vulnerability from ossf_malicious_packages
-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-
Source: amazon-inspector (d8fcad12c3078bf2134f5e3cafd7ffa0ecf9f2bfec919533881d5c65b738b9fa)
On require() of the package, index.js loads./polyfill.js which assembles a set of C2 hostnames from split string fragments via.join('') — resolving to oob-worker.cf99-9b3.workers.dev, oob-worker.cf100-416.workers.dev, oob-worker.cf101-adf.workers.dev, oob-worker.cf102-baf.workers.dev, with a DNS TXT base64 fallback via sdk.dl.wel1.ru. _polyfill.js downloads an OS-specific binary via https.get, writes it under /tmp or %TEMP% with a disguised name (e.g..cache or dotnet_diag_.exe), chmods it 0755, and spawns it detached via spawn('/bin/sh', ['-c', path+' &']) or spawn('cmd',...). No pinning, no hash/signature verification, hostnames concealed by fragment concatenation. Package name mimics an internal-looking scoped/branded name for a finance/payments domain.
- CWE-506 - The product contains code that appears to be malicious in nature.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"cwes": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-506",
"description": "The product contains code that appears to be malicious in nature.",
"name": "Embedded Malicious Code"
}
],
"indicators": {
"evidence_files": [
{
"path": "_polyfill.js",
"sha256": "893b2becb9d35b90d2732caf31f2af165b59864c93cb3ecad9790afa1329a3f5",
"tlsh": "fea1a55a16fb20080792e1d4851f641671daf5537285e894fb8caa984fda239c3f3afc"
}
],
"package_integrity": [
{
"filename": "sme-rko-finance-front-payments-domain-35.8.1.tgz",
"hashes": {
"sha1": "3c69186536576c688980b11a36a3bb27c421c112",
"sha512_sri": "sha512-r24oSh03jph25w9jZ/Iz/vaqViqx51+XgAtwQSOyyQwq3YxrNhH0lvCyZfXerLeGpCsYJKrH+VZqMAdYVKuz0Q=="
}
}
]
}
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "sme-rko-finance-front-payments-domain"
},
"versions": [
"35.8.1"
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"contact": [
"inspector-research@amazon.com"
],
"name": "Amazon Inspector",
"type": "FINDER"
}
],
"database_specific": {
"malicious-packages-origins": [
{
"id": "IN-MAL-2026-017165",
"import_time": "2026-08-08T00:53:08.08444841Z",
"modified_time": "2026-08-08T00:47:18Z",
"sha256": "d8fcad12c3078bf2134f5e3cafd7ffa0ecf9f2bfec919533881d5c65b738b9fa",
"source": "amazon-inspector",
"versions": [
"35.8.1"
]
}
]
},
"details": "\n---\n_-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_\n\n## Source: amazon-inspector (d8fcad12c3078bf2134f5e3cafd7ffa0ecf9f2bfec919533881d5c65b738b9fa)\nOn require() of the package, index.js loads./_polyfill.js which assembles a set of C2 hostnames from split string fragments via.join(\u0027\u0027) \u2014 resolving to oob-worker.cf99-9b3.workers.dev, oob-worker.cf100-416.workers.dev, oob-worker.cf101-adf.workers.dev, oob-worker.cf102-baf.workers.dev, with a DNS TXT base64 fallback via sdk.dl.wel1.ru. _polyfill.js downloads an OS-specific binary via https.get, writes it under /tmp or %TEMP% with a disguised name (e.g..cache_\u003chex\u003e or dotnet_diag_\u003chex\u003e.exe), chmods it 0755, and spawns it detached via spawn(\u0027/bin/sh\u0027, [\u0027-c\u0027, path+\u0027 \u0026\u0027]) or spawn(\u0027cmd\u0027,...). No pinning, no hash/signature verification, hostnames concealed by fragment concatenation. Package name mimics an internal-looking scoped/branded name for a finance/payments domain.\n",
"id": "MAL-2026-13660",
"modified": "2026-08-08T00:47:18Z",
"published": "2026-08-08T00:47:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://www.npmjs.com/package/sme-rko-finance-front-payments-domain/v/35.8.1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.4",
"summary": "Malicious code in sme-rko-finance-front-payments-domain (npm)"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.