JVNDB-2008-000046

Vulnerability from jvndb - Published: 2008-09-02 07:58 - Updated:2008-09-02 07:58
Severity
N/A (UNKNOWN) - -
Summary
La!cooda WIZ and LacoodaST vulnerable to cross-site request forgery
Details
La!cooda WIZ and LacoodaST contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. La!cooda WIZ from System Consultants Co., Ltd. and LacoodaST from SpaceTag, Inc. are groupware providing schedule and task managements, etc. La!cooda WIZ and LacoodaST contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Hirotaka Katagiri reported this vulnerability to IPA. JPCERT/CC coordinated with the vendors under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.
Show details on JVN DB website

{
  "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2008/JVNDB-2008-000046.html",
  "dc:date": "2008-09-02T16:58+09:00",
  "dcterms:issued": "2008-09-02T16:58+09:00",
  "dcterms:modified": "2008-09-02T16:58+09:00",
  "description": "La!cooda WIZ and LacoodaST contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. \r\n\r\nLa!cooda WIZ from System Consultants Co., Ltd. and LacoodaST from SpaceTag, Inc. are groupware providing schedule and task managements, etc. La!cooda WIZ and LacoodaST contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. \r\n\r\nHirotaka Katagiri reported this vulnerability to IPA.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the vendors under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.",
  "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2008/JVNDB-2008-000046.html",
  "sec:cpe": [
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/a:spacetag:lacoodast",
      "@product": "LacoodaST",
      "@vendor": "SPACETAG INC.",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/a:system_consultants:la_cooda_wiz",
      "@product": "La!coodaWIZ",
      "@vendor": "System Consultants Co.,Ltd.",
      "@version": "2.2"
    }
  ],
  "sec:cvss": {
    "@score": "2.6",
    "@severity": "Low",
    "@type": "Base",
    "@vector": "AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
    "@version": "2.0"
  },
  "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2008-000046",
  "sec:references": [
    {
      "#text": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN83428818/index.html",
      "@id": "JVN#83428818",
      "@source": "JVN"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-3736",
      "@id": "CVE-2008-3736",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2008-3736",
      "@id": "CVE-2008-3736",
      "@source": "NVD"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://secunia.com/advisories/31582",
      "@id": "SA31582",
      "@source": "SECUNIA"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://secunia.com/advisories/31574",
      "@id": "SA31574",
      "@source": "SECUNIA"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30791",
      "@id": "30791",
      "@source": "BID"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/44592",
      "@id": "44592",
      "@source": "XF"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://jvndb.jvn.jp/ja/contents/2008/JVNDB-2008-000046.html",
      "@id": "JVNDB-2008-000046",
      "@source": "JVNDB_Ja"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
      "@id": "CWE-352",
      "@title": "Cross-Site Request Forgery(CWE-352)"
    }
  ],
  "title": "La!cooda WIZ and LacoodaST vulnerable to cross-site request forgery"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…