ICSA-16-061-01
Vulnerability from csaf_cisa - Published: 2016-12-03 07:00 - Updated: 2025-06-05 21:37| Product | Identifier | Version | Remediation |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Schneider Electric Automation Server: <=V1.7.0
Schneider Electric / Automation Server
|
<=V1.7.0 |
Mitigation
Mitigation
fix
|
{
"document": {
"category": "csaf_security_advisory",
"csaf_version": "2.0",
"distribution": {
"text": "Disclosure is not limited",
"tlp": {
"label": "WHITE",
"url": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/tlp/"
}
},
"lang": "en-US",
"notes": [
{
"category": "legal_disclaimer",
"text": "All information products included in https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics are provided \"as is\" for informational purposes only. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) does not provide any warranties of any kind regarding any information contained within. DHS does not endorse any commercial product or service, referenced in this product or otherwise. Further dissemination of this product is governed by the Traffic Light Protocol (TLP) marking in the header. For more information about TLP, see https://us-cert.cisa.gov/tlp/.",
"title": "Legal Notice"
},
{
"category": "general",
"text": "This CSAF advisory was extracted from unstructured data and may contain inaccuracies. If you notice any errors, please reach out to the designated contact at CISA CSAF: central@cisa.dhs.gov",
"title": "CISA Disclaimer"
},
{
"category": "general",
"text": "CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation.",
"title": "Recommended Practices"
},
{
"category": "general",
"text": "Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, ensuring they are not accessible from the internet.",
"title": "Recommended Practices"
},
{
"category": "general",
"text": "Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolating them from business networks.",
"title": "Recommended Practices"
},
{
"category": "general",
"text": "When remote access is required, use more secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs). Recognize VPNs may have vulnerabilities, should be updated to the most recent version available, and are only as secure as the connected devices.",
"title": "Recommended Practices"
},
{
"category": "general",
"text": "CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures.",
"title": "Recommended Practices"
},
{
"category": "general",
"text": "CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies.",
"title": "Recommended Practices"
},
{
"category": "general",
"text": "CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets.",
"title": "Recommended Practices"
},
{
"category": "general",
"text": "Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B--Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies.",
"title": "Recommended Practices"
},
{
"category": "general",
"text": "Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.",
"title": "Recommended Practices"
},
{
"category": "general",
"text": "CISA also recommends users take the following measures to protect themselves from social engineering attacks: Do not click web links or open attachments in unsolicited email messages. Refer to Recognizing and Avoiding Email Scams for more information on avoiding email scams. Refer to Avoiding Social Engineering and Phishing Attacks for more information on social engineering attacks.",
"title": "Recommended Practices"
}
],
"publisher": {
"category": "coordinator",
"contact_details": "central@cisa.dhs.gov",
"name": "CISA",
"namespace": "https://www.cisa.gov/"
},
"references": [
{
"category": "self",
"summary": "ICS Advisory ICSA-16-061-01 JSON",
"url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cisagov/CSAF/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2016/icsa-16-061-01.json"
},
{
"category": "self",
"summary": "ICS Advisory ICSA-16-061-01 - Web Version",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-16-061-01"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "Recommended Practices",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/alerts/ICS-ALERT-10-301-01"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "Recommended Practices",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/ics-recommended-practices"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "Recommended Practices",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/topics/industrial-control-systems"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "Recommended Practices",
"url": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/recommended_practices/NCCIC_ICS-CERT_Defense_in_Depth_2016_S508C.pdf"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "Recommended Practices",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Cybersecurity_Best_Practices_for_Industrial_Control_Systems.pdf"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "Recommended Practices",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ics/tips/ICS-TIP-12-146-01B"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "Recommended Practices",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/sites/default/files/publications/emailscams0905.pdf"
},
{
"category": "external",
"summary": "Recommended Practices",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/tips/ST04-014"
}
],
"title": "Schneider Electric Building Operation Automation Server Vulnerability",
"tracking": {
"current_release_date": "2025-06-05T21:37:39.217752Z",
"generator": {
"date": "2025-06-05T21:37:39.217703Z",
"engine": {
"name": "CISA CSAF Generator",
"version": "1.0.0"
}
},
"id": "ICSA-16-061-01",
"initial_release_date": "2016-12-03T07:00:00.000000Z",
"revision_history": [
{
"date": "2016-12-03T07:00:00.000000Z",
"legacy_version": "Initial",
"number": "1",
"summary": "Initial Publication"
},
{
"date": "2025-06-05T21:37:39.217752Z",
"legacy_version": "CSAF Conversion",
"number": "2",
"summary": "Advisory converted into a CSAF"
}
],
"status": "final",
"version": "2"
}
},
"product_tree": {
"branches": [
{
"branches": [
{
"branches": [
{
"category": "product_version_range",
"name": "\u003c=V1.7.0",
"product": {
"name": "Schneider Electric Automation Server: \u003c=V1.7.0",
"product_id": "CSAFPID-0001"
}
}
],
"category": "product_name",
"name": "Automation Server"
}
],
"category": "vendor",
"name": "Schneider Electric"
}
]
},
"vulnerabilities": [
{
"cve": "CVE-2016-2278",
"cwe": {
"id": "CWE-78",
"name": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"
},
"notes": [
{
"category": "summary",
"text": "Schneider Electric Struxureware Building Operations Automation Server AS 1.7 and earlier and AS-P 1.7 and earlier allows remote authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary OS commands by defeating an msh (aka Minimal Shell) protection mechanism.",
"title": "Vulnerability Summary"
}
],
"product_status": {
"known_affected": [
"CSAFPID-0001"
]
},
"remediations": [
{
"category": "mitigation",
"details": "Schneider Electric has released a new version of Automation Server firmware which remediates this vulnerability. The user is no longer allowed to operate the system with default credentials and the minimal \u201cmsh\u201d shell can no longer be circumvented. Users should contact their authorized Schneider Electric service channel to access the firmware update.",
"product_ids": [
"CSAFPID-0001"
]
},
{
"category": "mitigation",
"details": "For more information, please see Schneider Electric\u2019s Security Notification number SEVD-2016-025-01 at the following location on their web site: (http://www.schneider-electric.com/ww/en/download/document/SEVD-2016-025-01)",
"product_ids": [
"CSAFPID-0001"
],
"url": "http://www.schneider-electric.com/ww/en/download/document/SEVD-2016-025-01"
}
],
"scores": [
{
"cvss_v3": {
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
},
"products": [
"CSAFPID-0001"
]
}
]
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.