GSD-2024-31869

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2024-04-11 05:03
Details
Airflow versions 2.7.0 through 2.8.4 have a vulnerability that allows an authenticated user to see sensitive provider configuration via the "configuration" UI page when "non-sensitive-only" was set as "webserver.expose_config" configuration (The celery provider is the only community provider currently that has sensitive configurations). You should migrate to Airflow 2.9 or change your "expose_config" configuration to False as a workaround. This is similar, but different to CVE-2023-46288 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-9qqg-mh7c-chfq which concerned API, not UI configuration page.
Aliases
To clipboard 

{
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2024-31869"
      ],
      "details": "Airflow versions 2.7.0 through 2.8.4 have a vulnerability that allows an authenticated user to see sensitive provider configuration via the \"configuration\" UI page\u00a0when \"non-sensitive-only\" was set as \"webserver.expose_config\" configuration (The celery provider is the only community provider currently that has sensitive configurations). You should migrate to Airflow 2.9 or change your \"expose_config\" configuration to False as a workaround. This is similar, but different to  CVE-2023-46288 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-9qqg-mh7c-chfq  which concerned API, not UI configuration page.",
      "id": "GSD-2024-31869",
      "modified": "2024-04-11T05:03:20.611210Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "security@apache.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2024-31869",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "Apache Airflow",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_affected": "\u003c=",
                          "version_name": "2.7.0",
                          "version_value": "2.8.4"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "Apache Software Foundation"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Manmeet Rangoola"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Jarek Potiuk"
        }
      ],
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "Airflow versions 2.7.0 through 2.8.4 have a vulnerability that allows an authenticated user to see sensitive provider configuration via the \"configuration\" UI page\u00a0when \"non-sensitive-only\" was set as \"webserver.expose_config\" configuration (The celery provider is the only community provider currently that has sensitive configurations). You should migrate to Airflow 2.9 or change your \"expose_config\" configuration to False as a workaround. This is similar, but different to  CVE-2023-46288 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-9qqg-mh7c-chfq  which concerned API, not UI configuration page."
          }
        ]
      },
      "generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-200",
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38795",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38795"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/pz6vg7wcjk901rmsgt86h76g6kfcgtk3",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/pz6vg7wcjk901rmsgt86h76g6kfcgtk3"
          }
        ]
      },
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "cve": {
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "Airflow versions 2.7.0 through 2.8.4 have a vulnerability that allows an authenticated user to see sensitive provider configuration via the \"configuration\" UI page\u00a0when \"non-sensitive-only\" was set as \"webserver.expose_config\" configuration (The celery provider is the only community provider currently that has sensitive configurations). You should migrate to Airflow 2.9 or change your \"expose_config\" configuration to False as a workaround. This is similar, but different to  CVE-2023-46288 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-9qqg-mh7c-chfq  which concerned API, not UI configuration page."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "Las versiones 2.7.0 a 2.8.4 de Airflow tienen una vulnerabilidad que permite a un usuario autenticado ver la configuraci\u00f3n confidencial del proveedor a trav\u00e9s de la p\u00e1gina de interfaz de usuario \"configuraci\u00f3n\" cuando se configur\u00f3 \"solo no confidencial\" como configuraci\u00f3n \"webserver.expose_config\" (el proveedor de apio es el \u00fanico proveedor comunitario actualmente que tiene configuraciones confidenciales). Deber\u00edas migrar a Airflow 2.9 o cambiar tu configuraci\u00f3n \"expose_config\" a False como workaround. Esto es similar, pero diferente a CVE-2023-46288 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-9qqg-mh7c-chfq, que se refer\u00eda a la API, no a la p\u00e1gina de configuraci\u00f3n de la UI."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2024-31869",
        "lastModified": "2024-04-18T13:04:28.900",
        "metrics": {},
        "published": "2024-04-18T08:15:38.037",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "security@apache.org",
            "url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/38795"
          },
          {
            "source": "security@apache.org",
            "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/pz6vg7wcjk901rmsgt86h76g6kfcgtk3"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
        "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-200"
              }
            ],
            "source": "security@apache.org",
            "type": "Secondary"
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.