GSD-2022-3926
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:19Details
The WP OAuth Server (OAuth Authentication) WordPress plugin before 3.4.2 does not have CSRF check when regenerating secrets, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins regenerate the secret of an arbitrary client given they know the client ID
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2022-3926",
"id": "GSD-2022-3926"
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-3926"
],
"details": "The WP OAuth Server (OAuth Authentication) WordPress plugin before 3.4.2 does not have CSRF check when regenerating secrets, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins regenerate the secret of an arbitrary client given they know the client ID",
"id": "GSD-2022-3926",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:40.248168Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "contact@wpscan.com",
"ID": "CVE-2022-3926",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "WP OAuth Server (OAuth Authentication)",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "=",
"version_value": "0"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Unknown"
}
]
}
},
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Lana Codes"
}
],
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The WP OAuth Server (OAuth Authentication) WordPress plugin before 3.4.2 does not have CSRF check when regenerating secrets, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins regenerate the secret of an arbitrary client given they know the client ID"
}
]
},
"generator": {
"engine": "WPScan CVE Generator"
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/e1fcde2a-91a5-40cb-876b-884f01c80336",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/e1fcde2a-91a5-40cb-876b-884f01c80336"
}
]
},
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:wp-oauth:wp_oauth_server:*:*:*:*:*:wordpress:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndExcluding": "3.4.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "contact@wpscan.com",
"ID": "CVE-2022-3926"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The WP OAuth Server (OAuth Authentication) WordPress plugin before 3.4.2 does not have CSRF check when regenerating secrets, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins regenerate the secret of an arbitrary client given they know the client ID"
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-352"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/e1fcde2a-91a5-40cb-876b-884f01c80336",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/e1fcde2a-91a5-40cb-876b-884f01c80336"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 3.6
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2022-12-06T19:40Z",
"publishedDate": "2022-12-05T17:15Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…