GSD-2022-31170

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:19
Details
OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8's `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn't implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2022-31170
To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2022-31170",
    "description": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn\u0027t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.",
    "id": "GSD-2022-31170"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2022-31170"
      ],
      "details": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn\u0027t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.",
      "id": "GSD-2022-31170",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:17.816733Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "ID": "CVE-2022-31170",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC",
        "TITLE": " OpenZeppelin Contracts\u0027s ERC165Checker may revert instead of returning false"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "openzeppelin-contracts",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "\u003e= 4.0.0, \u003c 4.7.1"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "OpenZeppelin"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn\u0027t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1."
          }
        ]
      },
      "impact": {
        "cvss": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        }
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "CWE-20: Improper Input Validation"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
            "refsource": "CONFIRM",
            "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw"
          }
        ]
      },
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      }
    },
    "gitlab.com": {
      "advisories": [
        {
          "affected_range": "\u003e=4.0.0 \u003c4.7.1",
          "affected_versions": "All versions starting from 4.0.0 before 4.7.1",
          "cwe_ids": [
            "CWE-1035",
            "CWE-20",
            "CWE-937"
          ],
          "date": "2022-07-21",
          "description": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 is vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that does not implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.",
          "fixed_versions": [
            "4.7.1"
          ],
          "identifier": "CVE-2022-31170",
          "identifiers": [
            "GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
            "CVE-2022-31170"
          ],
          "not_impacted": "All versions before 4.0.0, all versions starting from 4.7.1",
          "package_slug": "npm/@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable",
          "pubdate": "2022-07-21",
          "solution": "Upgrade to version 4.7.1 or above.",
          "title": "Improper Input Validation",
          "urls": [
            "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
            "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552",
            "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw"
          ],
          "uuid": "2cc01cf5-ed15-485d-8b82-8134e2153b6b"
        },
        {
          "affected_range": "\u003e=4.0.0 \u003c4.7.1",
          "affected_versions": "All versions starting from 4.0.0 before 4.7.1",
          "cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
          "cwe_ids": [
            "CWE-1035",
            "CWE-252",
            "CWE-937"
          ],
          "date": "2022-08-01",
          "description": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 is vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that does not implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.",
          "fixed_versions": [
            "4.7.1"
          ],
          "identifier": "CVE-2022-31170",
          "identifiers": [
            "CVE-2022-31170",
            "GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw"
          ],
          "not_impacted": "All versions before 4.0.0, all versions starting from 4.7.1",
          "package_slug": "npm/@openzeppelin/contracts",
          "pubdate": "2022-07-22",
          "solution": "Upgrade to version 4.7.1 or above.",
          "title": "Improper Input Validation",
          "urls": [
            "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
            "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552",
            "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw"
          ],
          "uuid": "2fbdc191-e99c-412f-bd0f-1531b418d051"
        }
      ]
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:openzeppelin:contracts:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndExcluding": "4.7.1",
                "versionStartIncluding": "4.0.0",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2022-31170"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8\u0027s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn\u0027t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-252"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Patch",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
          "impactScore": 3.6
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2022-08-01T15:50Z",
      "publishedDate": "2022-07-22T04:15Z"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.